Aberrant Hypermethylation of SALL3 with HPV Involvement Contributes to the Carcinogenesis of Cervical Cancer

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the methylation status of the promoter region of spalt-like transcription factor 3 (SALL3) and the expression of SALL3 in cervical cancer to explore the function of this gene in cervical cancer carcinogenesis.

Methods

The methylation status of SALL3 was detected by methylation-specific PCR, and SALL3 gene expression was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR in the cervical cancer cell lines, SiHa, HeLa and C33A, as well as in cervical cancer tissue samples (n = 23), matched pericarcinomatous tissue samples (n = 23) and normal cervix tissue samples (n = 17). MTT was used to measure the cell viability and proliferation capacity of SiHa and HeLa cells.

Results

The SALL3 promoter was completely methylated in SiHa cells, unmethylated in C33A cells and partially methylated in HeLa cells. After treatment of SiHa and HeLa cells with 5 μM and 10 μM of 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza), respectively, the methylation level of the SALL3 promoter decreased and observed increase in the degree of unmethylation in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, the relative expression of SALL3 mRNA increased as the concentration of 5-Aza increased in SiHa (p<0.05) and HeLa (p<0.05) cells. This above-mentioned increase in SALL3 mRNA in SiHa cells was more remarkable than that observed in HeLa cells. Cell proliferation capacity also decreased after administration of 5-Aza to SiHa and HeLa cells (p<0.05). Methylation of the SALL3 promoter was observed in 15 of 23 (65.21%) cervical cancer tissue samples, 15 of 23 (65.21%) matched pericarcinomatous tissue samples and 5 of 17 (29.41%) normal cervical tissue samples (p<0.05). SALL3 mRNA expression was significantly lower in cervical cancer and pericarcinomatous tissues compared with normal cervical tissues (p<0.05). In all cervix tissue samples, HPV infection was positively associated with hypermethylation of the promoter region of SALL3 (p<0.05, r = 0.408), and the expression of SALL3 mRNA in HPV-positive tissues was lower than that in HPV-negative tissues (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The aberrant hypermethylation of SALL3 together with HPV involvement inactivated its function as a tumor suppressor and contributed to carcinogenesis in cervical cancer.

About the Authors:

Xing Wei

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Shaohua Zhang

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical College, Xi’an 710077, China

Di Cao

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Minyi Zhao

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Qian Zhang

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Juan Zhao

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Ting Yang

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Meili Pei

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Li Wang

Affiliation: Center of Maternal and Child Health Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Yang Li

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Xiaofeng Yang

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi’an 710061, China

Introduction

Cervical cancer ranks as the second leading cause of genital tract cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, and results in approximately 266,000 deaths each year according to the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines (2015 version)[1].Over 99% of cases are linked to infection of the genitals with human papillomaviruses (HPVs), which have been identified in the etiology of cervical cancer and have infected approximately 660 million people[2]; however, the prevalence of HPV infection is still insufficient to account for all instances of cervical carcinogenesis. In the past few years, epigenetic mechanisms, especially DNA methylation, have emerged and have subsequently provided new insights into the occurrence of tumors[3, 4]. Nevertheless, scientists continue to explore the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and the development of cancers in genomics.

Spalt-like transcription factor 3 (SALL3) is a member of the SAL family and is located on 18q23. SALL3 encodes a sal-like C₂H₂-type zinc-finger protein. Mutations in some of these genes are associated with congenital disorders in humans, which indicates their importance in embryonic development[5–7]. Shikauchi et al[8]found that SALL3 was silenced by DNA methylation and that the protein product of this gene (SALL3) directly interacts with the PWWP domain of DNMT3A in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which suggested that SALL3 acts as a tumor suppressor in HCC. Love et al[9] sequenced the exomes of 59 Burkitt lymphoma tumors, and the results showed for the first time that SALL3 was recurrently mutated in Burkitt lymphomas. Furthermore, in CD133 (+) colorectal cancer cells (CRC), SALL3 was significantly up-regulated compared with CD133 (-) CRC cells[10]. Moreover, a recent study utilizing high-throughput DNA methylation analysis also showed that SALL3 was a potential biomarker for colon cancer[11]. The above-mentioned findings demonstrate that abnormal expression of SALL3 is associated with the occurrence of several cancers. However, whether SALL3 is involved in the carcinogenesis of cervical cancer remains unknown.

In our current study, we demonstrated that the promoter region of SALL3 is hypermethylated and, together with HPV infection, is involved in cervical cancer; additionally, the expression level of SALL3 mRNA was down-regulated. We suggest that DNA methylation of SALL3 inhibits its role as a tumor suppressor and contributes to the carcinogenesis of cervical cancer.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the “Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University” in Shannxi, China. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for participation in this study.

Cell lines and culture conditions

The three human cervical cancer cell lines SiHa、HeLa and C33A were given to us by Dr. Jing Ji from the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University[12, 13]. All these cells were cultured in the high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)(HyClone, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)(Si Ji Qing, China) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂.

5-Azacytidine Treatment

1.0×10⁵/ well SiHa and HeLa cells were cultured separately in 6-well plates in DMEM with 10% FBS, and after 24 hours, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing 0, 5 or 10 μM 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza)(Sigma, USA). The medium containing 5-Aza was replaced every 24 hours during a 72-hour period.

MTT Assay

3×10³/ well SiHa or HeLa cells were seeded into 96-well plates and were cultured with 0, 5, or 10 μM 5-Aza. Throughout a 5-day period, the medium was replaced every 24 h, and the same concentration of 5-Aza was added. A 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-3-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to assess the proliferative capacity of SiHa and HeLa cells after treatment with 5-Azacytidine according to a standard protocol. Cell viability was measured by the absorbance at 490 nm.

Patients and samples

Twenty-three cervical cancer tissue specimens, 23 matched pericarcinomatous tissue specimens and 17 normal cervical tissue specimens were obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between January 2014 and December 2014. All patients were diagnosed by pathologic examination and none had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. Every patient was voluntary for this research study and provided written informed consent.

The cervical cancer samples were collected from the center of the tumors, while the samples of pericarcinomatous tissues originated 1.0 cm away from the cancerous tissue. Seventeen samples of normal cervix were obtained from the uterine cervix of patients who underwent a total hysterectomy due to benign uterine diseases. The average size of each sample was 0.5 cm×0.5 cm×0.5 cm. After the tissues were dissected, each sample was washed with sterilized PBS and stored at -80°C. All procedures were performed on ice.

DNA extraction, bisulfite modification and methylation-specific PCR (MSP)

Genomic DNA was isolated from cells and tissues using a TaKaRa Mini BEST Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 500 ng of the extracted DNA was bisulfite-modified with the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research, USA). The primer pairs used in the MSP were as follows: SALL3: 5’-ATTTTAGAATGGAAGGGAGTTCGTC-3’ (forward), 5’-ATAACCTCCTAAAACTTCCCCGAA-3’ (reverse) for methylation and 5’-ATTTTAGAATGGAAGGGAGTTTGTTG-3’ (forward), 5’-AAATAACCTCCTAAAACTTCCCCAAA-3’ (reverse) for unmethylation. Both of the PCR products were 197 bp. The thermocycler programs were as follows: 95°C for 10 minutes and 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, the annealing temperature for the methylated primer pairs was 51°C while that for the unmethylated primer pairs was 50°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds followed by an incubation at 72°C for 7 minutes.The PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel, stained with Gelview and visualized under ultraviolet illumination. Each reaction was performed in triplicate.

HPV-DNA testing

HPV-DNA of twenty-three cervical cancer tissue samples and seventeen normal cervix tissue samples were tested by polymerase chain reaction(PCR) and flow-through hybridization. 21 HPV genotypes were qualitatively tested by HPV genotyping test kit according to alkaline phosphatase system(HybriBio,China),including high-risk types HPV-16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59 and 68,low-risk types HPV-6,11,42,43,44 and common types in China HPV-53,66 and CP8304.

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR(Q-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cells and tissues using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used for real-time quantitative PCR are as follows: SALL3: 5’-CAAAGCGAGCTCAGAAACAG-3’ (forward), 5’-CCTGATGCTCCAACTTCAAA-3’ (reverse); GAPDH: 5’-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3’ (forward), 5’-TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA-3’ (reverse). The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 30 seconds, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds. We used the cycle threshold (CT) as the representative point. The relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in each group (fold-change compared with control) was calculated using the formula: RQ = 2^-△△Ct. Each reaction was performed in triplicate.

Statistical Analysis

All the data were analyzed with SPSS version 18.0.Consecutive data were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis H test or one-way ANOVA analysis. Categorical data were compared by Pearson Chi-Square test. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and differences where p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Detection of the methylation status in the promoter regions of SALL3 in cervical cancer cell lines

DNA methylation always occurs in areas that are rich in CpG islands such as promoter regions. A common cause of many malignancies is abnormal hypermethylation or hypomethylation of promoter CpG islands, which results in the transcriptional repression of many tumor suppressor genes or the reactivation of oncogenes. We used the online software “MethPrimer” to profile one CpG island in the region that is located from -1859 to -54 bp upstream from ATG, the transcription start site (TSS) in the SALL3 promoter (Fig 1A). One pair of primers was designed to amplify the SALL3 promoter region. To identify the methylation status of this region in cervical cancer cell lines, we used methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to determine the SALL3 promoter methylation status in SiHa, C33A and HeLa cells. The results showed that this region in SiHa cells was completely methylated, whereas this region was completely unmethylated in C33A and partially methylated in HeLa cells (Fig 1B).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Detection of the methylation status in the promoter regions of SALL3 in cervical cancer cell lines.

(A) Predicted CpG islands in the promoter region of SALL3. Numbers indicate the positions in bp relative to the transcription start site. The blue region represents the CpG islands and the red vertical bars are the CpG loci in these input sequences. (B) Detection of SALL3 methylation status by MSP in SiHa, C33A and HeLa cell lines. (M: methylated; U: unmethylated).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.g001

5-Azacytidine treatment demethylates SALL3 promoter region and reverses the expression of SALL3

In most cases, DNA methylation is a reversible process. To identify whether the methylation status in the promoter region regulates the expression of our gene of interest at the transcription level, we detected the expression of SALL3 in cell lines in which the SALL3 promoter is strongly methylated (SiHa and HeLa) after treatment with 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza), which can cause DNA demethylation. We measured the methylation by MSP and real-time Q-PCR. The results showed that the intensity of methylation of the SALL3 promoter in both SiHa and HeLa cell lines decreased, while the unmethylation of SALL3 gradually increased as the concentration of 5-Aza increased (Fig 2). Moreover, we found that the expression of SALL3 mRNA in SiHa and HeLa cells increased significantly in a dose-dependent manner after the administration of 5-Aza (p<0.05); the increased expression that was observed in SiHa cells was more remarkable than that observed in HeLa cells (Table 1, Fig 3). These results suggested that the expression of SALL3 was reversed by 5-Aza, which demethylated the SALL3 promoter and promoted the expression of the SALL3 gene at the transcriptional level.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Detection of the methylation status in the promoter regions of SALL3 in SiHa(A) and HeLa(B) cells after treated with 5-Aza.

(M: methylated; U: unmethylated).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in SiHa and HeLa cells after treatment with different concentrations of 5-Aza.

(*p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.g003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in SiHa and HeLa cells treated with 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.t001

Demethylation of the SALL3 promoter could inhibit the proliferation of cervical cancer cells

We used an MTT assay to explore whether the proliferation capacity of SiHa and HeLa cells was effected by SALL3 methylation. After treatment with 5-Aza, the cell viability of both SiHa and HeLa cells was weakened in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.05)(Fig 4), which demonstrated that demethylation of the SALL3 in promoter region could enhance the expression of SALL3 and lead to a decrease in the cell viability and proliferation capacity of the cervical cancer cell lines SiHa and HeLa.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. Cell viability and proliferation capacity of the cervical cancer cell lines SiHa(A) and HeLa(B) after treatment with 5-Aza(*p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.g004

The SALL3 promoter region was hypermethylated in cervical cancer tissues

To further confirm the methylation status of the promoter region of SALL3 in cervical cancer tissues, we performed MSP in 23 cervical cancer tissues, 23 matched pericarcinomatous tissues and 17 normal cervical tissues. As shown in Table 2,in cervical cancer tissues, 15 were methylated (65.21%) and 8 were unmethylated (34.78); in pericarcinomatous tissues, 15 were methylated (65.21%) and 8 were unmethylated (34.78%); in normal cervical tissues, 5 were methylated (29.41%) and 12 were unmethylated (70.59%). The difference between the groups was significant (p<0.05) (Table 2) except that no significant difference was observed between the cancer and pericarcinomatous tissues (p>0.05). However, the average gray-scale level was higher in the cancerous tissues (data not shown). These results demonstrated that the SALL3 promoter was hypermethylated in cancer tissues, which might play a role in the carcinogenesis of cervical cancer (Fig 5).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. Detection of SALL3 methylation status by MSP in cervical cancer tissues (A), matched-pericarcinomatous tissues (B) and normal cervix tissues(C) (M: methylated; U: unmethylated).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.g005

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Methylation status of SALL3 in cervical cancer, pericarcinomatous tissues and normal cervix.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.t002

Hypermethylation of the SALL3 promoter inhibited gene expression at the transcriptional level

We detected the expression of SALL3 mRNA in the 23 cervical cancer tissues, 23 matched pericarcinomatous tissues and 17 normal cervical tissues by real-time Q-PCR. Compared with the normal cervix, the average relative expression of SALL3 was lower in cervical cancer tissues (p<0.05) and pericarcinomatous tissues (p<0.01), but no significant difference was observed between the tumor tissues and pericarcinomatous tissues (p>0.05) (Fig 6A).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 6. (A) Relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in cervical cancer, pericarcinomatous and normal cervical tissues. These data are represented by the median with an interquartile range (*p<0.05) (B) Relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in methylated and unmethylated cervical tissues.

These data are represented by the median with an interquartile range (*p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.g006

In addition, we separated these samples into two groups. One group consisted of the tissues where the promoter region of SALL3 was methylated, and the other consisted of the tissues where that region was unmethylated. The average relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in the methylated tissues was lower than that in the unmethylated tissues (p<0.05) (Fig 6B). These results demonstrated that hypermethylation of SALL3 inhibited SALL3 gene expression at the transcriptional level.

High-risk HPV infection was positively associated with hypermethylation of the SALL3 promoter region in cervical cancer

Given that high-risk HPV infection is involved in the etiology of cervical cancer, we further explored the relationship between HPV infection and hypermethylation of the SALL3 promoter region in cervical cancer. In cervical cancer tissues, 14 of 18 HPV-positive samples were methylated (77.78%), and 4 were unmethylated (22.22%); 1 of 5 HPV-negative samples was methylated (20.00%), and 4 were unmethylated (80.00%). In normal cervix tissues, 2 of 6 HPV-positive samples were methylated (33.33%), and 4 were unmethylated (66.67%); 3 of 11 HPV-negative samples was methylated (27.27%), and 8 were unmethylated (72.73%). The combined statistical results were shown in Table 3. The difference between these two groups was significant (p<0.05). In addition, we found a positive relationship between HPV infection and hypermethylation of the SALL3 promoter region in cervix tissues (p = 0.010, r = 0.408)(Table 3), which demonstrated that hr-HPV infection has a close relevance with methylation in the SALL3 promoter regions.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. The relationship between HPV infection and hypermethylation of SALL3 in cervical cancer.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.t003

Moreover, the relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in the HPV-positive tissues was lower than that in the HPV-negative tissues (Fig 7). The results of HPV types of 40 cervix tissue samples were shown in S1 Table.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 7. Relative expression of SALL3 mRNA in HPV-positive and HPV-negative tissues.

These data are represented by the median with an interquartile range (*p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.g007

Discussion

On a global scale, the incidence rate of cervical cancer accounts for 13% of all malignant tumors in females and is second only to breast cancer[14, 15]. Although genital HPV has been found to have a close association with the etiology of cervical cancer, and despite the widespread use of screening methods and vaccines[16], the incidence and mortality rate are still high, especially in less developed countries[17–19]. Hence, elucidation of the pathogenesis of cervical cancer is of great importance.

DNA methylation is the most common form of epigenetic modification and is essential for various developmental processes through its regulation of gene expression, genomic imprinting, and epigenetic inheritance[20]. Recent studies have shown that aberrant DNA methylation in promoter regions (and CG islands in particular) is closely related to the genesis of many cancers because a reduction in the methylation of the entire genome or the hypermethylation of promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes affects gene expression[21, 22]. As a consequence, the abnormal methylation of tumor-related genes plays a significant role in carcinogenesis[23]. The discovery of specific methylation markers of different cancers could have a profound impact.

SALL3 is a member of SAL family locates at 18q23[24], an essential gene in the development of human body. Deletion of 18q23 caused loss of audition, heart problem, mental retardation, growth retardation, limb deformity and so on[7, 24].For the past few years, scientists aimed at the relevance between SALL3 expression and carcinogenesis. Yu et al[25]had found SALL3 hypermethylated in promoter regions rich in CG dinucleotide in bladder cancer cell lines and tissues, which could be a novel DNA methylation marker in the detection of bladder cancer. What’s more, the promoters of SALL3 were hypermethylated in H719 cell line[26]. In addition, Yang et al[27]discovered that the hypermethylation of SALL3 contributed to the decrease of SALL3 mRNA in HCC.

In our study, we have explored the feasibility of detecting hypermethylated SALL3 in promoter regions as a screening method for cervical cancer. In cervical cancer cell lines SiHa and HeLa, of which were both HPV positive cell lines, were methylated in SALL3 promoter regions but in C33A, an HPV negative cell line, SALL3 was unmethylated in the promoter region. Meanwhile, in cervical cancer tissues, matched pericarcinomatous tissues and normal cervix tissues, the results showed hypermethylation of SALL3 in cervical cancer and pericarcinomatous tissues compared with in normal cervix tissues (p<0.05).Our result was consistent with Shikauchi et al[8] and Yang et al[27].

Taken these together, the infection of HPV might participate in the mechanism of SALL3 methylation-related carcinogenesis. High-risk HPV (hrHPV)-induced immortalization and malignant transformation are accompanied by DNA methylation of host genes. Schütze et al[28]found that HPV-induced immortalization was associated with a sequential and progressive increase in promoter methylation of a subset of genes, including hTERT, mir124–2, PRDM14 and so on, which was mostly independent of the viral immortalization capacity. In our study, surprisingly, by means of analyzing the relationship between HPV infection and SALL3 methylation status in cervix tissues, the results demonstrated that genomic hypermethylation and lower mRNA expression in transcription level of SALL3 in HPV-positive cervical cancer tissues when compared with in HPV-negative tissues(p<0.05) and hr-HPV infection positively associated with hypermethylation of SALL3 promoter region (p<0.05,r = 0.408),which was consistent with Schütze and our previous study on cervical cancer cell lines, bringing us new evidence that HPV infection did have participated in the carcinogenesis of cervical cancer. However in our present study, the order of two events—hr-HPV infection and SALL3 methylation occurred and whether they had direct interaction (with E6/E7 or other gene loci) still remains unknown. We’ll keep on searching for the mechanism of carcinogenesis induced by HPV infection and DNA methylation in the following researches.

In order to further verify the relationship between methylation and gene expression, we treated SiHa and HeLa, which were strongly SALL3 methylated in promoter region, with 5-Azacytidine,an agent could play a role on DNA demethylation on a genome-wide scale. The results suggested that when the concentration of 5-Aza elevated generally, the level of methylation of SALL3 dropped off as well as unmethylated expression increased significantly in SiHa and HeLa(p<0.05). At the same time, the mRNA relative expression of SALL3 in SiHa and HeLa increase also and the increased extent in SALL3 totally methylated cell line SiHa was more remarkable than in HeLa, the SALL3 partial-methylated cell line, which suggested that demethylation of SALL3 could effectively reverse its expression in transcription level. Then, MTT assay showed that after treated with 5-Aza, the cell viability and proliferation of SiHa and HeLa significantly weakened which illustrated a cancer-inhibiting function of SALL3 in cervical cancer cells. In tissue samples, the Q-PCR results suggested that mRNA expression of SALL3 was higher in cancer and pericarcinomatous tissues than in normal cervix tissues(p<0.05), which shared the similar idea with previous studies[27]. In addition, statistical analysis of mRNA expression between methylated and unmethylated tissues revealed that in SALL3 methylated tissues, the mRNA of SALL3 was higher than in unmethylated tissues(p<0.05).Taken together, the results demonstrated SALL3 hypermethylation contributed to the down-regulation of gene expression in transcription level in cervical cancer.

In conclusion, our research first demonstrated that the promoter of SALL3 was of hypermethylation, and due to this mechanism down-regulated the mRNA expression and accelerated cell growth in cervical cancer tissues and cell lines. High-risk HPV infection as an etiology of cervical cancer participated in SALL3 methylation. This aberrant methylation status on the whole genome scale inactivated its function as a tumor suppressor and contributed to the carcinogenesis of cervical cancer.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Table. HPV types of 40 cervix tissue samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81472428).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XW XFY. Performed the experiments: XW SHZ DC MYZ QZ JZ TY MLP LW YL XFY. Analyzed the data: XW SHZ XFY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XFY. Wrote the paper: XW XFY.

Citation: Wei X, Zhang S, Cao D, Zhao M, Zhang Q, Zhao J, et al. (2015) Aberrant Hypermethylation of SALL3 with HPV Involvement Contributes to the Carcinogenesis of Cervical Cancer. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0145700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145700

References

1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer, V.2.2015. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical cancer.pdf. Accessed December 13,2014. 12/13/2014.

2. Ennaifer E, Tounsi H, Ben Aissa R, Kalai K, Fehri E, Laassili T, et al. Screening of cervical HPV infection at the reproductive health centre of ariana. La Tunisie medicale. 2014;92(4):253–7. Epub 2014/09/17. pmid:25224420.

3. Roossink F, de Jong S, Wisman GB, van der Zee AG, Schuuring E. DNA hypermethylation biomarkers to predict response to cisplatin treatment, radiotherapy or chemoradiation: the present state of art. Cellular oncology (Dordrecht). 2012;35(4):231–41. Epub 2012/07/28. pmid:22836879.

4. Kroeze LI, van der Reijden BA, Jansen JH. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine: An epigenetic mark frequently deregulated in cancer. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2015;1855(2):144–54. Epub 2015/01/13. pmid:25579174.

5. Parrish M, Ott T, Lance-Jones C, Schuetz G, Schwaeger-Nickolenko A, Monaghan AP. Loss of the Sall3 gene leads to palate deficiency, abnormalities in cranial nerves, and perinatal lethality. Molecular and cellular biology. 2004;24(16):7102–12. Epub 2004/07/30. pmid:15282310; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC479739.

6. Kojima T, Asano S, Takahashi N. Teratogenic factors affect transcription factor expression. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry. 2013;77(5):1035–41. Epub 2013/05/08. pmid:23649242.

7. Chai L. The role of HSAL (SALL) genes in proliferation and differentiation in normal hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Transfusion. 2011;51 Suppl 4:87S–93S. Epub 2011/12/07. pmid:22074632; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3258526.

8. Shikauchi Y, Saiura A, Kubo T, Niwa Y, Yamamoto J, Murase Y, et al. SALL3 interacts with DNMT3A and shows the ability to inhibit CpG island methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Molecular and cellular biology. 2009;29(7):1944–58. Epub 2009/01/14. pmid:19139273; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2655625.

9. Love C, Sun Z, Jima D, Li G, Zhang J, Miles R, et al. The genetic landscape of mutations in Burkitt lymphoma. Nature genetics. 2012;44(12):1321–5. Epub 2012/11/13. pmid:23143597; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3674561.

10. Kim ST, Sohn I, Do IG, Jang J, Kim SH, Jung IH, et al. Transcriptome analysis of CD133-positive stem cells and prognostic value of survivin in colorectal cancer. Cancer genomics & proteomics. 2014;11(5):259–66. Epub 2014/10/22. pmid:25331798.

11. Zhang C, Zhao H, Li J, Liu H, Wang F, Wei Y, et al. The Identification of Specific Methylation Patterns across Different Cancers. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0120361. Epub 2015/03/17. pmid:25774687.

12. Ji J, Zheng PS. Activation of mTOR signaling pathway contributes to survival of cervical cancer cells. Gynecologic oncology. 2010;117(1):103–8. Epub 2010/01/28. pmid:20102778.

13. Ji J, Zheng PS. Expression of Sox2 in human cervical carcinogenesis. Human pathology. 2010;41(10):1438–47. Epub 2010/08/17. pmid:20709360.

14. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–917. Epub 2011/02/26. pmid:21351269.

15. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2014;64(1):9–29. Epub 2014/01/09. pmid:24399786.

16. Van Kriekinge G, Castellsague X, Cibula D, Demarteau N. Estimation of the potential overall impact of human papillomavirus vaccination on cervical cancer cases and deaths. Vaccine. 2014;32(6):733–9. Epub 2013/12/03. pmid:24291200.

17. Pirek D, Petignat P, Vassilakos P, Gourmaud J, Pache JC, Rubbia-Brandt L, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype distribution among Cameroonian women with invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective study. Sexually transmitted infections. 2015. Epub 2015/03/10. pmid:25746041.

18. Munoz N, Bravo LE. Epidemiology of cervical cancer in Colombia. Salud publica de Mexico. 2014;56(5):431–9. Epub 2015/01/22. pmid:25604289.

19. Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, He J. Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011. Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu. 2015;27(1):2–12. Epub 2015/02/27. pmid:25717220; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4329176.

20. Guo X, Wang L, Li J, Ding Z, Xiao J, Yin X, et al. Structural insight into autoinhibition and histone H3-induced activation of DNMT3A. Nature. 2015;517(7536):640–4. Epub 2014/11/11. pmid:25383530.

21. Bishop KS, Ferguson LR. The interaction between epigenetics, nutrition and the development of cancer. Nutrients. 2015;7(2):922–47. Epub 2015/02/04. pmid:25647662; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4344568.

22. Lee HS, Yun JH, Jung J, Yang Y, Kim BJ, Lee SJ, et al. Identification of differentially-expressed genes by DNA methylation in cervical cancer. Oncology letters. 2015;9(4):1691–8. Epub 2015/03/20. pmid:25789025.

23. Zhu X, Shan L, Wang F, Wang J, Shen G, Liu X, et al. Hypermethylation of BRCA1 gene: implication for prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in sporadic primary triple-negative breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2015. Epub 2015/03/19. pmid:25783183.

24. Kohlhase J, Hausmann S, Stojmenovic G, Dixkens C, Bink K, Schulz-Schaeffer W, et al. SALL3, a new member of the human spalt-like gene family, maps to 18q23. Genomics. 1999;62(2):216–22. Epub 1999/12/28. pmid:10610715.

25. Yu J, Zhu T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Qian Z, Xu H, et al. A novel set of DNA methylation markers in urine sediments for sensitive/specific detection of bladder cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2007;13(24):7296–304. Epub 2007/12/21. pmid:18094410.

26. Wu LP, Wang X, Li L, Zhao Y, Lu S, Yu Y, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor depsipeptide activates silenced genes through decreasing both CpG and H3K9 methylation on the promoter. Molecular and cellular biology. 2008;28(10):3219–35. Epub 2008/03/12. pmid:18332107; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2423178.

27. Yang XX, Sun JZ, Li FX, Wu YS, Du HY, Zhu W, et al. Aberrant methylation and downregulation of sall3 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2012;18(21):2719–26. Epub 2012/06/13. pmid:22690083; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3370011.

28. Schütze DM, Kooter JM, Wilting SM, Meijer CJLM, Quint W, Snijders PJF, et al. Longitudinal assessment of DNA methylation changes during HPVE6E7-induced immortalization of primary keratinocytes. Epigenetics: official journal of the DNA Methylation Society. 2015;10(1):73–81.