It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore gender differences in self-concept and achievement in math and reading among elementary-aged students. Research questions were constructed to explore (a) within-group differences of boys and girls in terms of their math and reading self-concepts and achievement scores, (b) between-group differences of boys and girls in areas of math and reading self-concept and achievement, and (c) the predictive utility of gender, math and reading self-concept, and the interaction of gender and math and reading self-concept in relation to math and reading achievement.
The study used archival data of 104 students in the third through the sixth grades, enrolled in a rural elementary school in Arizona. Approximately half of participants were male and half were female. Data were collected via file reviews for gender, demographic, and Terra Nova reading and math achievement scores. Survey research procedures were also utilized via questionnaires to collect self-concept data, using math and reading composite self-concept variables from the Self-Description Questionnaire, developed by Marsh (1990).
Bivariate and multivariate statistical procedures were used within a correlational design, with t test, repeated-measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA), and hierarchical multiple regression analysis (MRA) procedures. Results of dependent-samples t tests demonstrated no significant differences in math and reading self-concepts or achievement scores for boys. Among girls, the only significant mean-level difference was found in higher reported reading self-concept scores, than math self-concept scores. Girls did not, however, exhibit significantly higher reading than math achievement scores.
Results of RM-ANOVA procedures revealed no significant differences between boys and girls in the domains of reading and math achievement. Similarly, no significant differences were obtained between boys and girls in either domain (math or reading) of self-concept.
Significant multiple regression models were specified for both reading achievement and math achievement. The independent variables were gender and reading self-concept in the first model, and gender and math self-concept for the second model. Dependent variables consisted of matched areas of reading and math achievement.
Although both MRA models were significant, they accounted for only about 9% of the variance in math and reading achievement. The gender by self-concept interaction variables were not significant for either model (math or reading), indicating that the relationships between domain-specific self-concept and achievement were not moderated by gender.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





