ARTICLE
Received 27 Jul 2015 | Accepted 21 Jan 2016 | Published 19 Feb 2016
Volcanic activity is often accompanied by many small earthquakes. Earthquake focal mechanisms represent the fault orientation and slip direction, which are inuenced by the stress eld. Focal mechanisms of volcano-tectonic earthquakes provide information on the state of volcanoes via stresses. Here we demonstrate that quantitative evaluation of temporal stress changes beneath Mt. Ontake, Japan, using the mist angles of focal mechanism solutions to the regional stress eld, is effective for eruption monitoring. The moving average of mist angles indicates that during the precursory period the local stress eld beneath Mt. Ontake was deviated from the regional stress eld, presumably by stress perturbations caused by the ination of magmatic/hydrothermal uids, which was removed immediately after the expulsion of volcanic ejecta. The deviation of the local stress eld can be an indicator of increases in volcanic activity. The proposed method may contribute to the mitigation of volcanic hazards.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 OPEN
Monitoring eruption activity using temporal stress changes at Mount Ontake volcano
Toshiko Terakawa1, Aitaro Kato1, Yoshiko Yamanaka1, Yuta Maeda1, Shinichiro Horikawa1, Kenjiro Matsuhiro1
& Takashi Okuda1
1 Earthquake and Volcano Research Center, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, D2-2 (510) Furo-cho Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.T. (email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:10797 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797
The local stress eld around volcanoes represents the superposition of the regional stress eld and stress perturbations related to volcanic activity14. Temporal
stress changes over periods of weeks to months are generally attributed to volcanic processes. Examining the focal mechanism solutions of volcano-tectonic (VT) earthquakes provides detailed information on the state of a volcano via the local stress eld. This has the potential to contribute to prediction of eruptions over the short and medium term (weeks to months).
Mt. Ontake volcano is the second highest stratovolcano in Japan and is located at the southern end of the Northern Japan Alps. On 27 September 2014, around 11:52 hours JST (UTC 9),
Mt. Ontake produced a hydrothermal (steam-type) eruption with a volcanic explosivity index (VEI) value of 2 (ref. 5). Mt. Ontake had been considered dormant until its rst historical eruption in October 1979. The 2014 eruption struck on a sunny Saturday in the autumn foliage season, resulting in the worst volcanic disaster in Japan in the last 90 years: 58 people died and 5 are still missing.
Mt. Ontake is continuously monitored by several relatively dense networks of permanent seismic stations operated by Nagoya University, Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), and Gifu and Nagano prefectures (Fig. 1a,b). The summit region of Mt. Ontake (Fig. 1a,b; latitude35.875 N35.900 N, longitude 137.44 E137.50 E) is normally almost aseismic, with an average of less than one event (Mo0)
per month, whereas the surrounding region is characterized by a high level of background seismicity (see Methods). The onset of VT earthquakes was observed on 31 August 2014 (Fig. 1b,c),
reaching a peak on 11 September 2014 before decaying over time until the eruption, although the seismicity increased again between 15 and 21 September 2014 during this period. Long-period earthquakes with peak frequencies of 15 Hz were recorded beginning around 15 September, but less than 10 long-period events were detected in real time. Application of a matched-lter technique to continuous waveforms (23 August to30 September 2014) resulted in detection of thousands of micro-seismic events, indicating that an increase in VT events was followed by an increase in the number of long-period events 5 days later6. This detailed analysis also revealed that VT events beneath the craters migrated upwards as well as laterally in the NNWSSE direction for the nal 10 min preceding the eruption6. The phenomenon synchronized with a rapid increase of preeruptive tremor amplitudes and with an unusual tiltmeter signal indicating summit upheaval6. After the eruption, the magnitudes of events became larger (Mo1); in contrast, most pre-eruption events had a magnitude of less than 0.
The time history of volcanic earthquakes during the pre-eruption period was explained by the generic volcanic earthquake swarm model7. In this respect, the history was similar to that associated with a previous minor eruption in 2007 (VEI 0)8.
However, unlike the 2007 eruption, the 2014 eruption was not preceded by active volcanic tremors and ination of the volcanic edice until 7 min before the eruption6,9. The time scale for the precursor period was also different from that in 2007. In general, the various observations of precursor processes make eruption forecasting difcult, although changes in volcanic seismicity have been successfully used empirically for predicting eruptions10,11.
a b
137.4 137.5
35.95
M 2 M 1
M 0 M 1 M 2
36.2
35.90
(km)
36.0
0 1 2
35.85
2 0 4
2
6
Depth (km)
1,000
c
35.8
Eruption
400
Number of events
2,000
300
(km)
0 10
M3 M2 M1 M0
20
200
35.6
137.2 137.6 138.0
100
0 15 20
5 30
25
10
0
Depth (km)
9/1 11 21 10/1 11 21 31Year 2014
Figure 1 | Seismicity around Mount Ontake. (a) Earthquake hypocentres and seismic stations in the Ontake region and (b) summit region. The circles denote hypocentres, and the colour scale corresponds to focal depth. The light blue, grey and black squares denote seismic stations operated by the Nagoya University, the national institutes and prefectural institutes, respectively. The blue rectangle in the inset in a shows the location of the Ontake region. The triangle, star, red rectangles and pink rectangle denote Mt. Ontake, the hypocentre of the 1984 Western Nagano Prefecture Earthquake, the summit region and the region depicted in Fig. 3b, respectively. The black dashed lines in a,b indicate the boundary between Nagano and Gifu prefectures. (c) Histogram of VT events per day in the summit region.
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:10797 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 ARTICLE
The local stress eld beneath volcanoes is directly inuenced by the ination of the ascending magma and magmatic/ hydrothermal uids14. As the focal mechanism solution of VT events contains information on the local stress eld, the relationships between stresses and volcanic processes have been studied by examining focal mechanisms and using theoretical models with the aim to successfully predict eruptions14,1217. However, systematic spatiotemporal changes in focal mechanisms do not necessarily indicate changes in the stress eld18, because earthquakes can be triggered at faults that are misoriented to the stress eld by a decrease in fault strength caused by an increase in pore uid pressure19,20. This effect cannot be ignored when evaluating the local stress elds beneath active volcanoes because the existence of over-pressurized uids is certain.
Here we propose a method to detect true temporal changes in the local stress eld beneath Mt. Ontake by examining the focal mechanism solutions of VT events relative to the regional stress pattern. Enhanced volcanic activity causes signicant stress perturbation with EW tension, using the crustal structure controlled by the regional stress eld. This results in a large deviation of the local stress eld from the regional stress eld before the 2014 eruption. We demonstrate that quantitative evaluation of temporal stress changes is an effective tool for eruption monitoring.
ResultsFocal mechanism solutions of VT earthquakes. We estimated the focal mechanism solutions of 94 VT earthquakes in the summit region (August 2014 to March 2015) from S:P amplitude ratios and P wave polarity data obtained through the dense seismic networks (Fig. 1a) using the HASH software package21. In the analysis, we assumed that the source was double couple (DC) and considered three velocity models (Supplementary Fig. 1) to account for possible errors in the hypocentres and take-off angles (see Methods). These solutions (Supplementary Table 1) were classied into four types based on the angle of the pressure, null and tension axes (P, N and T axes, respectively) with respect to the horizontal22: normal faulting, strikeslip faulting, reverse faulting and others (odd faulting) (Fig. 2a). The pre-eruption seismicity was dominated by normal faulting, which accounted for 7 ( 41%) of the 17 events in this period. The mean
orientation of the T axes during the precursory period was N75 E with an s.d. of 13 (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 2a). After the eruption, in contrast, 40 ( 52%) of the 77 events
showed reverse faulting, and normal faulting events became relatively rare (Fig. 2a). The mean orientation of the P axes during the post-eruption period was N101 E with an s.d. of 13 (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 2b), sub-parallel to the T axes of the precursory period, indicating that the local stress eld was markedly different during the periods before and after the eruption.
Regional stress eld around Mt. Ontake. To determine the relationships of the focal mechanism solutions to the regional stress eld, we estimated the regional stress pattern around Mt. Ontake from 536 focal mechanism solutions (MZ1) during a period of typical background seismicity (May 2012 to July 2014) using the centroid moment tensor (CMT) data inversion method23 (see Methods). The stress eld was roughly characterized by strikeslip faulting in the entire region. The axes of the maximum and minimum compressive principal stresses were sub-horizontal in the summit region, oriented N64 W and N25 E, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3), consistent with the previous studies2426. The orientations of the maximum and minimum horizontal principal stress axes varied within
N57 WN72 W and N17 EN33 E, respectively (see Methods). In a different region with an active micro-seismic swarm (Fig. 1a; latitude 35.85 N35.95 N, longitude 137.6 E137.7 E) the stress pattern was very similar to that in the summit region, but the uctuation ranges of the principal stress axes were smaller (o10) because of sufcient data for the inversion.
Temporal evolution of mist angles. We calculated the mist angle f of focal mechanisms between the observed slip vectors and theoretical slip vectors expected from the regional stress eld on the basis of the concept that seismic slip occurs in the direction of the resolved shear traction acting on a pre-existing fault27,28 (see Methods). When the mist angles are less than the estimation errors of the regional stress eld and focal mechanism solutions, events are considered to be consistent with the regional stress eld, because the actual slip vector agrees with the theoretical one within the estimation errors. For events in the summit region, the threshold value was B65 (errors in stresses: o20; errors in focal mechanisms: o45). Focal mechanism solutions with fZ90 are considered highly inconsistent because the actual and theoretical slip vectors are opposite. Before the eruption, only 5 ( 29%) of the 17 VT events were consistent
a
Eruption
After the eruption
52 %
23 %
16
Before the eruption
14
Normal Strike-slip Reverse Odd
6
Number of events
12
24 %
41 %
29 %
10%
10
14%
8
6
4
2
0 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 1/1 2/1 3/1 Year 2014 Year 2015
b
35.90
31/08/201427/09/2014:11:50 (km)
0 1
35.89
35.88
M 1.0
M 0.0 M 0.5
c
35.90
137.44 137.46 137.48 137.50
27/09/2014:11:5031/10/2014 (km)
0 1
Misfit angles
180
90
0
35.89
35.88
Figure 2 | Temporal changes in focal mechanism solutions.(a) Classication of focal mechanism solutions22. The pie charts show the proportions of the four faulting types before and after the eruption.(b) Focal mechanism solutions for the precursory period. (c) Focal mechanism solutions for the rst post-eruption period (27 September 2014 to 31 October 2014). Solutions are represented by lower hemisphere projections of focal spheres. The diamonds denote event epicentres. The colour scale indicates mist angles. Pink spots mark the craters of the 2014 eruption33.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:10797 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797
Eruption
180
a
Average misfit angles ()
150
120
90
60
30
0
180
b
Average misfit angles ()
150
120
90
60
30
0
9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 1/1 2/1 3/1 Year 2014 Year 2015
Figure 3 | Temporal evolution of average mist angles. The moving average of mist angles of focal mechanism solutions in the summit region is shown in a and that in the peripheral swarm region (Fig. 1a) is illustrated in b. The light green squares in both panels denote average mist angles. The black horizontal bars denote the time window for calculating average mist angles, and the black vertical bars denote the s.e. The blue, pink and grey dotted lines show the origin times of the 2014 eruption, low-frequency B-type (BL) events and high-frequency B-type (BH-type) events estimated by JMA. The thick red lines show the threshold angles (65 and 55) to detect deviations of the local stress eld in the summit and peripheral swarm regions, respectively, (Fig. 1a) from the regional stress eld. The thin red lines show another threshold angle (90) to detect a large inconsistency of the local stress eld to the regional stress eld. The yellow hatched zones indicate enhancements of mist angles above the threshold values.
with the regional stress eld and 10 ( 59%) of the events were
highly inconsistent (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 4). However, the ratio of consistent events increased to 470% during the period between the eruption and the end of December 2014 (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 4).
We calculated the moving average of mist angles over a varying time window containing 10 events, shifting the window by 1 event per calculation (Fig. 3a). The average mist angle signicantly exceeded the threshold value (65) prior to the eruption. Immediately after the eruption, however, the average mist angle showed a marked decrease. A less pronounced enhancement of the quantity was also observed during January to February 2015, followed by a gradual decrease at the end of February 2015. Meanwhile, such remarkable temporal changes in average mist angles were not observed in the peripheral swarm region (Fig. 1a), in which 89% of events had mist angles less than a threshold value of 55 (errors in stresses: o10; errors in focal mechanisms: o45), consistent with the regional stress eld during the entire period (Fig. 3b).
DiscussionThe velocity structure beneath Mt. Ontake is not well-known. Small changes in the hypocentre depends on variations in the velocity structure, which may produce large variations in take-off angles, making stable estimation of focal mechanism solutions difcult12,29. For events in the summit region, epicentral locations were basically independent of the velocity model (Supplementary Fig. 1) in which the differences between the three models were 130 m on average, but the dependency of hypocentral depths was not negligible. The hypocentral depths with Model 1 were 700 m shallower on average than those with Model 2 and 1 km deeper than those with Model 3. To examine the effects of uncertainty of the velocity model, we estimated focal mechanism solutions for
each of the three velocity models and calculated the moving average of mist angles for each case (Supplementary Fig. 5). In all cases, the three remarkable characteristics obtained from the stable data set of focal mechanism solutions (Fig. 3a) were commonly reproduced. This nding strongly indicates that the analysis of mist angles was robust and insensitive to the assumed velocity structures.
A signicant deviation of the local stress eld was expected to have occurred during the pre-eruption period. The most plausible physical mechanism for this change is a signicant stress perturbation due to enhanced volcanic activity14,15,16,3032. It is not unusual for the slip direction of post-eruption events to be controlled by the regional stress eld because stress perturbations induced by movement of magmatic/hydrothermal uids may be negligible32. The many reverse faulting events contributed to shrinkage of the volcanic edice after expulsion of volcanic ejecta.
The mean orientation of the T axes of pre-eruption events (N75E13) was roughly perpendicular to the near-vertical plane (strike N15 W) on which the relocated hypocentres of VT events were concentrated6 and to the alignment of craters from the 2014 eruption (Fig. 2b,c)33. Prior to the 2007 and 2014 eruptions, very long-period earthquakes with a period of 420 s were recorded at broadband seismic stations: the sources of these earthquakes are modelled by tensile cracks with strikes of N20 W (for the 2007 event)8 and N6 W (for the 2014 event)9. These results suggest that a volcanic system exists beneath Mt. Ontake in which ination is driven by magmatic/hydrothermal uids propagating upwards in a vertical crack. We suggest that the ination caused a stress perturbation with EW to ENEWSW tension, which altered the local stress eld during the period leading up to the eruption (Fig. 4).
The strike of this possible conduit for magmatic/hydrothermal uids is sub-parallel to that of a maximum shear plane of the
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:10797 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 ARTICLE
a b c
[afii9846]1
[afii9846]1
[afii9846]2
[afii9846]3
[afii9846]2
[afii9846]1
[afii9846]2 [afii9846]3[afii9846]3 [afii9846]3
[afii9846]3
[afii9846]1
[afii9846]3
[afii9846]1
[afii9846]2
Figure 4 | Stress eld rotation caused by volcanic activity. (a) The regional stress pattern in the summit region. (b) Horizontal stress rotation. (c) Vertical stress rotation. The stress pattern is shown by the focal spheres (lower hemisphere projections) in which nodal planes are the maximum shear planes. The blue, light green and red arrows show the axes of the maximum (s1,), intermediate (s2) and minimum (s3) compressive principal stresses, respectively. The pink dashed line in a indicates the strike of possible inating cracks. The pink arrows mark the main direction of crack opening.
regional stress eld (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 3), indicating that the Mt. Ontake eruption conduit followed structures with orientations controlled by the regional stress eld32,34. When the inationary pressure is sufciently high, clockwise rotation of the maximum and minimum principal stress axes occurs ahead of a propagating tensile crack (Fig. 4b)35. Strong tension may weaken the principal horizontal compressive stresses, meaning that the (vertical) intermediate principal stress becomes the maximum stress, resulting in a local stress eld characterized by normal faulting with EW tension (Fig. 4c). An increase in b-values during the pre-eruption period, although the values gradually declined from 16 September 2014 to just before the eruption, may be related to strengthening of the tensional stress eld due to the enhanced hydrothermal activity6,36.
As the hypocentral depths during the post-eruption period were systematically o1 km shallower than those before the eruption6, we cannot rule out that the regional stress eld in the summit region is heterogeneous on a small scale. If the regional stress eld was locally characterized by EW tension in the source region of the precursory events, stress perturbation with EW tension would increase the deviatoric stress, which would promote seismic slip with positive changes in the Coulomb failure function37. As the summit region is usually aseismic, activation of normal faulting with EW tension can be an indicator of an increase in volcanic activity.
The time history of average mist angles showed another slight enhancement in November 2014 other than that in JanuaryFebruary 2015. This indicates that re-pressurization of magmatic/hydrothermal uids beneath Mt. Ontake commenced again at the beginning of October 2014. The decreases in mist angles following the two enhancements indicate that some de-pressurization of magmatic/hydrothermal uids, for example, as a result of an undetected minor eruption, occurred at the end of November 2014 and February 2015.
The local stress eld in the peripheral swarm region (Fig. 1a) slightly deviated from the regional stress eld for a week before the 2014 eruption. An inversion analysis of focal mechanism solutions, repeated precise levelling measurements, magneto-telluric measurements, and geochemical analyses of water and gas samples demonstrated the presence of over-pressurized uids in the region3841. The porous network in the underground rock around Mt. Ontake is not well-known42. However, pore uid pressures in the peripheral swarm region may have been increased by the volcanic processes at Mt. Ontake, which in turn may have caused temporal changes in the stress eld of the peripheral swarm region. In that case, interaction between the volcanic eruption and inland earthquakes would be important. Five years after the rst historic eruption of Mt. Ontake in 1979, the Western Nagano Prefecture earthquake (Mj 6.8) occurred in
the southeast ank of the volcano in 1984 (Fig. 1a): the two events may have been linked.
Spatiotemporal changes in the local stress eld have been reported at many volcanoes through stress inversion and/or by examining the P and T axes of focal mechanism solutions1216. However, focal mechanisms are controlled by not only stresses but also fault strength, which is inuenced by pore uid pressures19,20,38,43,44. As earthquakes release stresses on preexisting faults by shear faulting, a decrease in fault strength due to an increase in pore uid pressures can trigger events on faults that are misoriented to the regional stress eld19,20,44. From a data set of biased focal mechanism solutions by over-pressurized uids, we may overestimate changes in the stress eld or yield apparent stress rotation20 because the method of stress inversion attributes spatiotemporal variation in focal mechanisms only to those stresses. The method of shear-wave splitting analysis is also useful to detect temporal changes in the local stress eld30,31, but a similar problem with apparent stress rotation has been reported45. In contrast, the average mist angle of focal mechanism solutions in the context of regional stress patterns is crucial in detecting true temporal changes in local stress elds. However, we may underestimate temporal changes in stresses because the method attributes variation in focal mechanisms to changes in fault strength as much as possible. When assessing temporal changes in focal mechanisms, ideally the effects of stresses should be separated from those of fault strength (pore uid pressures).
In this study, focal mechanism solutions were derived with a DC approximation because the magnitudes of events were low (Mo1). In a volcanic environment, however, the moment tensors of VT events may have non-DC, isotropic or compensated-linear-vector-dipole (CLVD) components46,47. In general, the inner tensor product48 of a moment tensor and the regional stress tensor seems to be useful instead of the mist angle to detect temporal changes in the local stress eld (see Methods). Earthquakes release part of the stress eld, and so the moment tensor of events must be somewhat similar to the stress tensor23. Thus, dissimilarities between the moment tensors and the regional stress tensor can be an indicator of temporal changes in the local stress eld. The moving average of inner tensor products were calculated from DC moment tensors converted from focal mechanism solutions: the results indicated that the inner tensor product has a strong negative correlation with the mist angle (Supplementary Figs 6a and 7a). Depressions of inner tensor products were detected in the precursory period, November 2014 and January to February 2015. Very similar results were obtained using possible non-DC moment tensors (Supplementary Figs 6c and 7b). This additional analysis showed that temporal stress changes can be robustly detected from the present data set although non-DC components were signicant.
If seismic networks are improved, we could expect more earthquake focal mechanisms with better quality, which would provide higher resolution information on temporal changes in the local stress eld and on the regional stress eld. If we can monitor the temporal evolution of average mist angles over a long period of time with multiple eruptive episodes at a particular volcano, the results would be useful for predicting eruptions by comparing current with previous behaviour. The minor eruption of Mt. Ontake in 2007 was undetected in real time but discovered afterwards by onsite investigation. By applying our approach to the data associated with such examples, this approach can be quantitatively evaluated.
The degree of temporal change in the local stress eld depends on the magnitude of the stress perturbation caused by volcanic processes relative to the background stress level14,17. To create a
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:10797 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797
practical warning system for volcanic eruptions, the absolute level of the local stress eld (that is, rock strength) and/or the pressure threshold of magmatic/hydrothermal uids required to trigger an eruption must be quantitatively evaluated, although differences in tectonic stresses, magma composition and local geology make it difcult to apply a single threshold to multiple volcanic systems. Nonetheless, the temporal stress changes observed using this approach can provide crucial constraints on the absolute stress level and the pressure threshold when combined with numerical modelling of the loading process and uid pressurization. This is a promising method for understanding the signals that indicate an imminent eruption.
Methods
Seismicity and focal mechanism solutions. To examine the seismicity around Mt. Ontake, we visually re-picked the arrival times of P and S waves and the polarities of P waves for 11,057 events (May 2012 to March 2015) that were automatically detected by the WIN system49. We used these data to construct an earthquake catalogue for the Ontake region (Fig. 1a). Over 98% of the 475 events in the summit region have Mo1. We also manually picked seismic events in the
Ontake region by examining continuous waveforms in a 2-month window encompassing the eruption (30 August 2014 to 31 October 2014) to understand the changes in the number of seismic events at the summit region (Fig. 1c).
We estimated focal mechanism solutions from S:P amplitude ratios and P wave polarity data using the HASH software package after improving its code21. The improved software allows calculation of take-off angles taking into account the elevations of seismic stations. To calculate S:P amplitude ratios, we pre-processed velocity seismograms by integrating them to obtain the displacement and ltering with a bandpass window of 520 Hz. The parameters for determining focal mechanism solutions were as follows: polarity picks 48; maximum azimuthal gap o90; maximum take-off angle gap o60 and signal-to-noise ratio 41.2. The fractions of reversed polarities to the nal focal mechanism solutions were 19% on average. We obtained 94 relatively well-constrained focal mechanism solutions with RMS fault plane uncertainties of o45, 53 of which possessed uncertainties of o35 (Supplementary Table 1).
CMT data inversion analysis. The CMT data inversion method23 derives the stress pattern from a large amount of CMT data for earthquakes using Akaikes Bayesian information criterion50,51. We targeted the region around Mt. Ontake (latitude 35.62 N36.16 N, longitude 137.3 E137.9 E, depth 020 km) as the model region. We distributed 2,475 (15 15 11) tri-cubic B splines (basis
functions) with equal spacing of 5 and 2.5 km local supports (grid intervals) in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively, to represent the regional stress eld. For the analysis, we used CMT data converted from focal mechanism solutions with RMS fault plane uncertainties of o35 (May 2012 to July 2014) using the well-known relationship between moment magnitude and seismic moment52.
From the data set, we determined the best estimates of the model parameters (expansion coefcients of the basis functions) using the YabukiMatsuura inversion formula53. Each component of the stress tensor at any location was obtained as a superposition of the basis functions (Supplementary Fig. 3). Note that only the relative values of the six stress components are meaningful, not the absolute values. Estimation errors were obtained using an L2-norm of error tensors25. We also evaluated the variation of principal stress axes using a bootstrap method with 100 data sets in which each converted moment tensor was rotated around an arbitrary vector within uncertainties. The estimation errors in the principal stress axes were B1520 and 510 in the summit and peripheral swarm regions, respectively (Fig. 1a).
Evaluating mist angles. For each focal mechanism solution, we calculated the theoretical slip vector (that is, the direction of the resolved shear traction on a nodal plane) using Cauchys formula, given the regional stress pattern at the hypocentre. As the true fault plane, we selected the nodal plane with the smaller angular difference between the actual and theoretical slip vectors of both nodal planes and dened the angular difference as the mist angle.
Detecting temporal stress changes from moment tensors. The inner tensor product is a quantity used to measure the closeness of two tensors48 and ranges from 1 to 1, where 1 indicates that the two tensors are exactly the same (other
than the scale factor), and 1 indicates that they are opposite. Before examining
the effects of non-DC components of moment tensors to our conclusion, we rst converted the focal mechanism solutions of 94 VT events (Supplementary Table 1) to DC moment tensors23, calculated the inner tensor products between the converted moment tensors and regional stress tensors, and evaluated the moving average of inner tensor products (Supplementary Figs 6a and 7a). For each event, we calculated a possible CLVD moment tensor, considering the axes of focal mechanism solutions and the P wave polarity data (Supplementary Fig. 6b). In the
calculation, we assumed that the directions of the axial tensional and compressive dipoles were parallel to those of the T and P axes of events of reverse and normal faulting22, respectively. Otherwise, when the number of dilatational/compressive rst-motion data was larger than that of compressive/dilatational data, we assumed that the CLVD moment tensors were calculated in the same manner as for reverse and normal faulting events, respectively. For remaining events, the CLVD moment tensors were obtained at random. We linearly combined these CLVD moment tensors with DC moment tensors to obtain possible non-DC moment tensors, where the weights of the CLVD moment tensors were assumed to be 30% of the DC moment tensors (Supplementary Fig. 6c). The possible moment tensors can explain the polarity data as well as the DC moment tensors (SupplementaryFig. 6a,c). Using these possible moment tensors, we evaluated the moving average of inner tensor products, indicating that effects of non-DC components were small for detecting temporal changes in the local stress eld (Supplementary Fig. 7). The isotropic component of moment tensors does not inuence the calculation of inner tensor products because the trace of the regional stress tensor inferred from focal mechanism solutions is zero.
References
1. Barker, S. E. & Malone, S. D. Magmatic system geometry at Mount St Helens modeled from the stress-eld associated with posteruptive earthquakes.J. Geophys. Res. 96 (B7), 1188311894 (1991).2. Rubin, A. M. & Gillard, D. Dike-induced earthquakes: theoretical considerations. J. Geophys. Res. 103 (B5), 1001710030 (1998).
3. Roman, D. C. & Cashman, K. V. The origin of volcano-tectonic earthquake swarms. Geology 34, 457460 (2006).
4. Vargas-Bracamontes, D. M. & Neuberg, J. W. Interaction between regional and magma-induced stresses and their impact on volcano-tectonic seismicity.J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 243, 9196 (2012).5. Earthquake Research Institute (The University of Tokyo). The 130th Coordinating Committee for Prediction of Volcanic Eruption. http://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/vois/data/tokyo/STOCK/kaisetsu/CCPVE/shiryo/130/130_no01.pdf
Web End =http:// http://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/vois/data/tokyo/STOCK/kaisetsu/CCPVE/shiryo/130/130_no01.pdf
Web End =www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/vois/data/tokyo/STOCK/kaisetsu/CCPVE/shiryo/130/ http://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/vois/data/tokyo/STOCK/kaisetsu/CCPVE/shiryo/130/130_no01.pdf
Web End =130_no01.pdf (2014).
6. Kato, A. et al. Preparatory and precursory processes leading up to the 2014 phreatic eruption of Mount Ontake, Japan. Earth Planets Space 67, 111 (2015).
7. McNutt, S. R. in Monitoring and Mitigation of Volcano Hazard (eds Scarpa, R. & Tilling, R. I.) 99146 (Springer-Verlag, 1996).
8. Nakamichi, H. et al. Source mechanism of a very-long-period event atMt Ontake, central Japan: response of a hydrothermal system to magma intrusion beneath the summit. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 187, 167177 (2009).
9. Maeda, Y. et al. Source mechanism of a VLP event immediately before the 2014 eruption of Mount Ontake, Japan. Earth Planets Space 67, 187 (2015).
10. Chouet, B. A. Long-period volcano seismicity: Its source and use in eruption forecasting. Nature 380, 309316 (1996).
11. Surono et al. The 2010 explosive eruption of Javas Merapi volcano-A 100-year event. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 241, 121135 (2012).
12. Patane, D. & Privitera, E. Seismicity related to 1989 and 1991-93 Mt. Etna (Italy) eruptions: kinematic constraints by fault plane solution analysis.J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 109, 7798 (2001).13. Umakoshi, K., Shimizu, H. & Matsuwo, N. Volcano-tectonic seismicity at Unzen Volcano, Japan 1985-1999. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 112, 117131 (2001).
14. Sanchez, J. J., Wyss, M. & McNutt, S. R. Temporal-spatial variations of stress at Redoubt volcano, Alaska, inferred from inversion of fault plane solutions.J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 130, 130 (2004).15. Roman, D. C., Moran, S. C., Power, J. A. & Cashman, K. V. Temporal and spatial variation of local stress elds before and after the 1992 eruptions of Crater Peak vent, Mount Spurr volcano, Alaska. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 23662379 (2004).
16. Roman, D. C., Neuberg, J. & Luckett, R. R. Assessing the likelihood of volcanic eruption through analysis of volcanotectonic earthquake fault-plane solutions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 248, 244252 (2006).
17. Roman, D. C. Numerical models of volcanotectonic earthquake triggering on non-ideally oriented faults. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L02304 (2005).
18. McKenzie, D. P. Relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and directions of principal stresses. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 59, 591601 (1969).19. Sibson, R. H. Rupture nucleation on unfavorably oriented faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 80, 15801604 (1990).
20. Terakawa, T., Hashimoto, C. & Matsuura, M. Changes in seismic activity following the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake: effects of pore uid pressure. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 365, 1724 (2013).
21. Hardebeck, J. L. & Shearer, P. M. Using S/P amplitude ratios to constrain the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 24342444 (2003).
22. Frohlich, C. Triangle diagramsTernary graphs to display similarity and diversity of earthquake focal mechanisms. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 75, 193198 (1992).
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:10797 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 ARTICLE
23. Terakawa, T. & Matsuura, M. CMT data inversion using a Bayesian information criterion to estimate seismogenic stress elds. Geophys. J. Int. 172, 674685 (2008).
24. Townend, J. & Zoback, M. D. Stress, strain, and mountain building in central Japan. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B03411 (2006).
25. Terakawa, T. & Matsuura, M. The 3-D tectonic stress elds in and around Japan inverted from centroid moment tensor data of seismic events. Tectonics 29, TC6008 (2010).
26. Yukutake, Y., Iio, Y. & Horiuchi, S. Detailed spatial changes in the stress eld of the 1984 western Nagano earthquake region. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B06305 (2010).
27. Wallace, R. E. Geometry of shearing stress and relation of faulting. J. Geol. 59, 118130 (1951).
28. Bott, M. H. P. The mechanics of oblique slip faulting. Geol. Mag. 96, 109117 (1959).
29. Di Giovambattista, R. & Barba, S. An estimate of hypocentre location accuracy in a large network: possible implications for tectonic studies in Italy. Geophys. J. Int. 129, 124132 (1997).
30. Gerst, A. & Savage, M. K. Seismic anisotropy beneath Ruapehu Volcano: a possible eruption forecasting tool. Science 306, 15431547 (2004).
31. Johnson, J. H., Savage, M. K. & Townend, J. Distinguishing between stress-induced and structural anisotropy at Mount Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B12303 (2011).
32. Ui, T, Nakamura, K. & Shibahashi, K. 1974 activity of Chokai volcano, Japan. Bull. Volcanol. 40-4, 231238 (1977).
33. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. Aerial photography and airborne SAR observation in response to the eruption of Mt. Ontake volcano. http://www.gsi.go.jp/BOUSAI/h26-ontake-index.html
Web End =http:// http://www.gsi.go.jp/BOUSAI/h26-ontake-index.html
Web End =www.gsi.go.jp/BOUSAI/h26-ontake-index.html (2014).
34. Nakamura, K., Jacob, K. H. & Davies, J. N. Volcanos as possible indicatorsof tectonic stress orientationAleutians and Alaska. Pure Appl. Geophys. 115, 87112 (1977).
35. Ukawa, M. & Tsukahara, H. Earthquake swarms and dike intrusions off the east coast of Izu peninsula, central Japan. Tectonophysics 253, 285303 (1996).
36. Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S. & Wyss, M. Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature 437, 539542 (2005).
37. King, G. C. P., Stein, R. S. & Lin, J. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 935953 (1994).
38. Terakawa, T. et al. Effects of pore uid pressure and tectonic stress on diverse seismic activities around the Mt. Ontake volcano, central Japan. Tectonophysics 608, 138148 (2013).
39. Kimata, F. et al. Ground uplift detected by precise leveling in the Ontake earthquake swarm area, central Japan in 2002-2004. Earth Planets Space 56, E45E48 (2004).
40. Yoshimura, R. et al. AMT observation around the focal region of the 1984 Western Nagno earthquake [in Japanese with English abstract]. Annu. Disas. Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ. 52B, 249254 (2009).
41. Nishio, Y., Okamura, K., Tanimizu, M., Ishikawa, T. & Sano, Y. Lithium and strontium isotopic systematics of waters around Ontake volcano, Japan: implications for deep-seated uids and earthquake swarms. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 297, 567576 (2010).
42. Sano, Y. et al. Ten-year helium anomaly prior to the 2014 Mt Ontake eruption. Sci. Rep. 5, 13069 (2015).
43. Miller, S. A. et al. Aftershocks driven by a high-pressure CO2 source at depth. Nature 427, 724727 (2004).
44. Terakawa, T. Evolution of pore uid pressures in a stimulated geothermal reservoir inferred from earthquake focal mechanisms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 74687476 (2014).
45. Johnson, J. H., Savage, M. K. & Townend, J. Distinguishing between stress-induced and structural anisotropy at Mount Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. J. Geophs. Res. 116, B12303 (2011).
46. Knopoff, L. & Randall, M. J. Compensated linear-vector dipole - A possible mechanism for deep earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 49574963 (1970).
47. Nakamichi, H. et al. Source mechanisms of deep and intermediate-depth low-frequency earthquakes beneath Iwate volcano, northeastern Japan. Geophys. J. Int. 154, 811828 (2003).
48. Michael, A. J. Use of focal mechanisms to determine stressa control study.J. Geophys. Res. 92(B1), 357368 (1987).49. Urabe, T. & Tsukada, S. A workstation-assisted processing system for waveform data from microearthquake networks [in Japanese]. Abstracts of Spring Meeting of Seismological Society of Japan. 70 (1991).
50. Akaike, H. in Application of Statistics (ed. Krishnaiah, P. R.) 2741 (North-Holland, 1977).
51. Akaike, H. in Bayesian Statistics (eds Bernardo, J. M., DeGroot, M. H., Lindley, D. V. & Smith, A. F. M.) 143166 (Univ. Press, 1980).
52. Hanks, T. C. & Kanamori, H. Moment magnitude scale. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 23482350 (1979).
53. Yabuki, T. & Matsuura, M. Geodetic data inversion using a Bayesian information criterion for spatial-distribution of fault slip. Geophys. J. Int. 109, 363375 (1992).
Acknowledgements
We thank Yuriko Shibayama and Eriko Yamaguchi for assistance with data processing, the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), Nagano and Gifu prefectures for providing seismic waveform data, and Jeanne Hardebeck and Peter Shearer for providing the HASH program code. This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Special Purposes (26900002), the Observation and Research Program for Prediction of Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions (MEXT), and the Earthquake Research Institute cooperative research program and in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientic Research C (26400451).
Author contributions
T.T. conceived the study, processed and analysed seismic wave data, interpreted the results, and wrote the paper. A.K. and Y.Y. helped in data processing. T.T., A.K., Y.Y. and Y.M. discussed the results and obtained the conclusions. S.H., K.M., T.O., Y.Y. and T.T. performed the eld work.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =http://www.nature.com/ http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =naturecommunications
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.
Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/ http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: Terakawa, T. et al. Monitoring eruption activity using temporal stress changes at Mount Ontake volcano. Nat. Commun. 7:10797doi: 10.1038/ncomms10797 (2016).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:10797 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10797 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2016
Abstract
Volcanic activity is often accompanied by many small earthquakes. Earthquake focal mechanisms represent the fault orientation and slip direction, which are influenced by the stress field. Focal mechanisms of volcano-tectonic earthquakes provide information on the state of volcanoes via stresses. Here we demonstrate that quantitative evaluation of temporal stress changes beneath Mt. Ontake, Japan, using the misfit angles of focal mechanism solutions to the regional stress field, is effective for eruption monitoring. The moving average of misfit angles indicates that during the precursory period the local stress field beneath Mt. Ontake was deviated from the regional stress field, presumably by stress perturbations caused by the inflation of magmatic/hydrothermal fluids, which was removed immediately after the expulsion of volcanic ejecta. The deviation of the local stress field can be an indicator of increases in volcanic activity. The proposed method may contribute to the mitigation of volcanic hazards.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer