Economic Benefits of Investing in Women’s Health: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Globally, the status of women’s health falls short of its potential. In addition to the deleterious ethical and human rights implications of this deficit, the negative economic impact may also be consequential, but these mechanisms are poorly understood. Building on the literature that highlights health as a driver of economic growth and poverty alleviation, we aim to systematically investigate the broader economic benefits of investing in women’s health.

Methods

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed health, gender, and economic literature to identify studies that investigate the impact of women’s health on micro- and macroeconomic outcomes. We developed an extensive search algorithm and conducted searches using 10 unique databases spanning the timeframe 01/01/1970 to 01/04/2013. Articles were included if they reported on economic impacts stemming from changes in women’s health (table of outcome measures included in full review, Table 1). In total, the two lead investigators independently screened 20,832 abstracts and extracted 438 records for full text review. The final review reflects the inclusion of 124 articles.

Results

The existing literature indicates that healthier women and their children contribute to more productive and better-educated societies. This study documents an extensive literature confirming that women’s health is tied to long-term productivity: the development and economic performance of nations depends, in part, upon how each country protects and promotes the health of women. Providing opportunities for deliberate family planning; healthy mothers before, during, and after childbirth, and the health and productivity of subsequent generations can catalyze a cycle of positive societal development.

Conclusions

This review highlights the untapped potential of initiatives that aim to address women’s health. Societies that prioritize women’s health will likely have better population health overall, and will remain more productive for generations to come.

About the Authors:

Kristine Husøy Onarheim

Contributed equally to this work with: Kristine Husøy Onarheim, Johanne Helene Iversen

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Johanne Helene Iversen

Contributed equally to this work with: Kristine Husøy Onarheim, Johanne Helene Iversen

Affiliation: Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

David E. Bloom

Affiliation: Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Introduction

The World Bank’s 1993 World Development Report (“Investing in Health”) emphasizes that health matters not just intrinsically, but also instrumentally for a society’s development [1, 2]. In 1994, the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) convened more than 20,000 delegates from 179 countries to discuss global development challenges. The galvanizing report of the consensus reached at the conference, the “Programme of Action,” was a landmark in articulating and advancing women’s rights [3]. The delegates adopted resolutions about reproductive health rights, gender equality (especially in regard to access to education), and the reduction of maternal and child mortality. The ICPD report acknowledges that these measures are important not simply for social justice, but because they are essential to viable and sustainable global development. That document informed the guiding set of principles for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and was a precursor to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), a doctrine that built on and expanded the “Programme of Action” mandate. More than 20 years have passed since the ICPD, and further research has explored how investments in health and sound health policies foment economic growth and development [2, 4–8] through various channels, including labor and productivity, savings, education, and age structure [1, 7, 9]. What the research has yet to deliver is an explicit investment strategy describing where to allocate resources in order to optimize health and economic gains.

The MDGs focused on meeting the needs of the world’s poorest, and as this program comes to an end a new development agenda is forming. Health was strongly present in the MDG targets, and health will play a crucial, albeit less dominant, role in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This program continues to grant significant attention to gender, and emphasizes women’s roles, both as individuals and as important contributors to economic and societal development. As a contribution to those discussions, this study attempts to gather and distill current evidence on the links among gender, health, and economic wellbeing.

Most diseases affect both sexes, but due to societal and biological factors, women and men are exposed to differing risks and barriers to health care. For example, the primary risk factor for lung disease in men is smoking, but for women it is household air pollution [10]. While women have lower mortality and live longer than men, with the gender gap in life expectancy rising from 4.8 to 5.7 years between 1970 and 2010 [11], young adult women have higher morbidity and bear a heavier burden of years of life lived with disability [12]. Women face persistent barriers in seeking health care and preventing disease, including gender discrimination, lack of education, and domestic violence [13]. Globally, great health inequities persist; data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (2013) show that the risk of maternal mortality is 19 times higher among women in developing countries than among their counterparts in developed countries [14]—among the greatest of all health disparities [13].

Because of these differences, we argue that the relationship between health and economic outcomes needs further analysis from a gender perspective. Previous reviews and reports have examined the economic spillovers associated with reproductive health [15–18]. In an effort to properly understand the full economic benefits of investments in health, we aim to extend this work by investigating the broader economic benefits of life-long investment in women’s health. We understand “investments in women’s health” to mean interventions that relate to women’s health. To also account for the negative effects of forgoing investment in women’s health, we have studied how the lack of interventions (as shown by poor women’s health) relates to economic development. We use fertility, intergenerational health spillover, education, productivity and savings as outcome variables when studying changes in women’s health (presented in Table 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Outcome measures by pathways.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120.t001

Methods

To be able to understand the broader economic benefits of investing in women’s health, we reviewed and condensed the existing knowledge through a cross-disciplinary systematic review.

Search Methods

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [19]. The search algorithm is based on three main topics: women, health, and economics. We developed the search strategy to focus on women’s health in particular and did not include spillover effects on men’s health. The literature on investing in health documents known pathways through which health influences economic development: labor participation, productivity, savings, education, and fertility [7–9]. In addition, because a growing body of literature describes cross-generational health links, we included intergenerational health effects as a possible pathway. The search strategy was based on the authors’ knowledge of the literature, and some areas or pathways may have been missed. We deliberately set up a broad search algorithm; used a wide variety of search terms, including synonyms; and performed the search in health, economic, and development databases (PubMed/Medline; Embase; The Cochrane Library Economic Evaluations; EconLit; Web of Science/Science Citation Index Expanded; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health [CINAHL]; The National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER]; Latin and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences database [LILACS]; Population, family planning, and related health issues [POPLINE]; and GenderWatch). We identified studies by searching 10 electronic databases, by snowball searching of references in key papers (pursuing the reference lists to identify additional papers), and by recommendations from colleagues. The search window was set from January 1, 1970, to April 1, 2013. The searches were performed in April 2013.

S1 Appendix provides a working protocol that details the search algorithms. As this is not a health care or social intervention review, the protocol was not registered in the Cochrane or Campbell Collaboration registries.

Selection Process

All records captured by the search algorithms and obtained from references and colleague referrals were exported to an EndNote library. After eliminating duplicates, the two lead investigators (JI and KO) screened these records using title and abstract in order to perform an independent eligibility assessment in an unblinded, standardized manner [19]. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Studies not meeting the eligibility criteria were excluded. After the first screening, the remaining records were extracted for full text review. When an article was not accessible through the Harvard University or University of Bergen libraries, we contacted the authors by email.

Inclusion Criteria

We considered articles for inclusion if they were in English and reported on broader economic or developmental benefits resulting from improvements in women’s health throughout the life cycle (see Table 1 for detailed outcome measures). We included experimental studies (randomized controlled trials) and descriptive studies (including observational studies controlling for important confounders, and comprehensive qualitative studies).

Exclusion Criteria

To ensure overall quality, articles considered to be methodologically simplistic (not experimental studies or descriptive studies) were excluded. The two main investigators assessed each study for potential selection bias (sampling bias or attrition bias) and reporting bias, and discussed the study design, reporting of results, and overall reliability. If the two main investigators agreed that there was a high chance of bias or low external validity in a study, it was excluded. We also excluded papers that reported on specific diseases not listed in the Global Burden of Disease 2010 cause list [10]. Studies published conducted prior to 1970 were excluded.

Data Extraction

We developed a data extraction sheet based on recommended literature and similar reviews; this sheet was pilot-tested on a subset of the review articles. For each study, the primary authors independently gathered information on pathways to economic return, type of study, setting (country and income level of country), population studied, time period, aim of study, study design and methods, main result, risk of bias, quality of study, and strengths and limitations of the study. The primary authors discussed the information they had gathered from the studies and resolved disagreements about pathways and other characteristics. The authors reported on each study and its characteristics in a joint document (see S2 Appendix). Meta-analysis was not performed, as substantial differences exist between both outcome variables and methodologies in the studies included. Due to this diversity, we did not strictly enforce the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome) approach.

As the aim of the study was to investigate the broader economic benefits of investing in women’s health, we chose to report the review findings based on the pathways in Table 1 and the extraction table (S2 Appendix). The authors discussed any disagreement about the understanding of the papers or pathways and consensus was reached concerning each study.

Results

This review finds that women’s health is tied to economic development.

Results of Review

The search algorithms captured 26,664 records, and references and colleague referrals yielded 112 additional records. We excluded 5,944 duplicates. The two lead investigators independently screened 20,834 abstracts, extracting 438 records for full text review. For the six articles that were not accessible through the Harvard University or University of Bergen libraries, we contacted the authors by email but ultimately were unable to secure the publications. The final review reflects the inclusion of 124 articles (Fig 1), with 41 originating from the reference search. The most common reasons for excluding studies from the review were that the studies did not address the scope of this study, or did not meet the study design inclusion criteria (i.e. were not experimental or observational studies). The most common reasons for excluding studies from the final review were that they did not meet the inclusion criteria (59) or poor methodology (15), e.g. failure to control for important confounders. The potential bias and validity concerns for each study are reported in S2 Appendix.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. The Data Extraction Process.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120.g001

Table 2 summarizes the included studies based on pathways. The majority of the studies examine intergenerational spillovers, and some describe how women’s health relates to more than one pathway.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Pathways: Women’s health and economic development.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120.t002

Fertility and Women’s Health: The Demographic Dividend

Bloom, Canning, and Sevilla describe how declines in fertility can boost economic growth through a phenomenon they label the demographic dividend [20]. When a given population transitions from high to low rates of mortality and fertility, a bulge occurs in the population age structure as mortality rates tend to drop before fertility rates. Coupled with a sound policy environment and labor opportunities, this “boom” generation can boost a country’s economy when it reaches working age through increased productivity and savings, and reduced dependency ratios [20]. Quantifying the economic gains from reduced fertility is difficult due to complex development processes are complex, but Ashraf et al. make an attempt using a demographic simulation model [21]. They estimate that the effect of an exogenous fertility reduction in a UN low-fertility population projection in Nigeria would raise per capita income by 5.6% and 11.9% over a horizon of 20 and 50 years, respectively [21]. Recent work by Bloom and colleagues suggests that Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal could each increase per capita income by 8–13% over the baseline scenario, wherein none of the unmet need for contraception is met, by meeting one third of the unmet need for family planning. This strategy would capture the demographic dividend; if each country meets all unmet need for contraception, per capita income could increase by 31–65% [22].

Some U.S. studies show how women’s control over their own fertility, through access to contraception and family planning, is also crucial for women’s opportunities in higher education and employment. Goldin and Katz found the availability of oral contraception in the U.S. to be associated with increased age at marriage and a greater number of women pursuing higher education and professional careers [23]. Family planning programs can influence national income directly through long-term effects on household finances and increased access to education. Children conceived in areas with greater access to family planning were 2–7% more likely to attain higher education and to live in higher-earning households [24].

Family planning enables women to have better-planned pregnancies and healthier babies. Access to birth control can reduce the likelihood of young maternal age at first birth (i.e. before age 22), increase the number of women participating in paid labor (by 8% among 26–30 year olds), raise the number of annual hours worked by women [25], and accelerate the reduction in birth rates by up to 40% [26]. Jamieson and Buescher found that women in the U.S. who used family planning services two years before they got pregnant were less likely to deliver low birth weight babies (though the findings were only statistically significant for African Americans) [27].

Abortion has been studied as a proxy for fertility control, and abortion legislation and access have been shown to affect education and productivity. The abortion ban implemented in Romania in 1967 is associated with worsened educational and labor market achievements for children born after the ban, after controlling for observable background variables [28]. Ananat et al. found that greater access to abortion in the U.S. is associated with higher rates of college graduation, lower rates of single parenthood, and lower odds of welfare receipt. [29]. Access to legalized abortion provides working women the option to avoid unwanted pregnancies and maintain their employment status; difference-in-difference analysis of the Roe vs. Wade case in the U.S. suggests that legal access to abortion services increased labor force participation rates, particularly among African American women [30]. Using abortion legislation as an instrument for fertility control in a cross-country study, Bloom et al. found a negative effect of high total fertility rates on female labor force supply. They estimate that each birth on average reduces a reproductive woman’s lifetime labor supply by almost two years [31]. Removing abortion restrictions can reduce fertility and allow women to contribute more to the labor force.

Improved reproductive health services are also shown shown to benefit the societies of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Results from Matlab, Bangladesh, show that the drop in fertility rates in areas with improved access to reproductive health services was associated with increases in women’s earnings and assets [32] and decreases in fertility [33]. Child survival, schooling, and mother and daughter body mass indexes (BMI) all improved in project villages, and physical household assets were 25% greater than in non-program intervention areas. Interestingly, even though this program only targeted women of reproductive age and their children, it also improved the health of the elderly women living in the households, indicating a positive spillover effect [33]. A similar experimental study in Ghana delivered enhanced reproductive health services to 83,000 randomly selected women between 1995 and 2011, and documented an initial decrease in fertility. However, in the last decade of the study, fertility stagnated or increased, possibly because the project neglected social mobilization and community ownership while focusing on other areas [34]. The study did not examine how the project affected society beyond the initial decrease in fertility. However, Miller found that contraception explains less than 10% of fertility reduction during Colombia’s demographic transition between 1964 and 1993, concluding that fertility is also influenced by many other factors[35].

Intergenerational Health Spillovers and Women’s Health: Maternal Health and Generational Dividends

Over her lifetime, a woman’s health has profound consequences for subsequent generations. Poor maternal health is associated with diminished child health, with implications for birth weight, neonatal survival, cognitive development, child behavior, school performance, and adult health and productivity [36–41]. Victora et al. conducted an important review on associations between maternal and child undernutrition and adult health and human capital based on data from five LMIC cohorts [37]. The authors conclude that ill health in childhood leads to long-term damage and may affect future generations; its prevention is therefore crucial to tapping “important health, educational, and economic benefits” [37].

Nutrition.

In 1995, Barker wrote that “coronary heart disease is associated with specific patterns of disproportionate fetal growth that result from fetal undernutrition in middle to late gestation”—later termed the fetal origins hypothesis [42]. This commenced a new field of research examining how events before birth influence future health [43]. Famine studies provide natural experiments to evaluate the long-term effects of fetal undernutrition, and Dutch and Chinese famine studies show that poor fetal growth is associated with higher risk of poor nutrition in utero, stunting, hyperglycemia, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality [44–48]. Studies from China also find that fetal exposure to acute maternal malnutrition negatively impacted literacy, income, labor market status, and marriage market outcomes [49, 50]. A study of the Greek famine finds a significant reduction in years of schooling for those exposed to famine in utero [51]. Hult et al. investigated the long-term health consequences of the Biafran famine in Nigeria and found that fetal and infant undernutrition is associated with significantly increased risk of hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance in 40-year old Nigerians [52].

Micronutrient deficiencies, anemia, stunting and low weight, height, and BMI in mothers all increase the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight, poor newborn health, stunting, and wasting in their children [53–64]. Much of this knowledge derives from a large, longitudinal supplementary feeding trial in two pairs of two Guatemalan villages, conducted between 1969 and 1977 by the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP) [65]. One village in each pair was randomly selected to receive a high-protein, high-energy supplement, Atole, while the other village received a no-protein, low-energy supplement, Fresco. All pregnant or lactating women and all children from birth to seven years of age were included, exposing all children to either of the supplements at different ages and for different periods of time [66]. Four follow-up studies on these mothers and children demonstrated that nutritional interventions in children under three years of age have a broad range of long-term effects. Child length gain during the first three years of life was greater in the Atole villages, and in follow-up studies these adolescents were taller, weighed more, and had greater lean body mass than subjects from Fresco villages [67, 68]. Further, the nutritional supplementation of girls in early childhood was found to have significant positive effects on the body size of their later offspring [69].

Maternal malnutrition perceived as overnutrition can also be harmful. Cresswell et al. show that maternal obesity increases the risk of neonatal death in 27 African countries [70]. When looking at stunting and BMI among children in South Africa and Brazil, respectively, children of overweight mothers face a significantly greater risk of being overweight. The association stayed significant after controlling for various socioeconomic factors [71, 72].

Determining whether the effects of improved maternal nutrition on child health result from better intrauterine conditions or improved nutrition as a young child is difficult. The previously described famine studies imply that the intrauterine environment is of great importance, but the literature is not conclusive. Subramanian et al. found that the association between childhood undernutrition and either paternal BMI or maternal BMI is of the same magnitude, indicating that intrauterine conditions may not directly determine nutritional status of offspring [73]. Even so, most literature points toward poor maternal health as being the greater risk factor for poor newborn and infant health, increasing the risk of child stunting and reduced cognitive development and affecting later productivity [74–77].

Improved maternal nutrition may offer the dual benefits of benefiting economic development through improved human capital accumulation, and improving the health of future generations (Fig 2). One example is an iodine intervention study from Tanzania, which found that children of mothers living in areas with iodine supplementation programs attained an estimated 0.35–0.56 years of additional schooling, compared with children living in areas without supplement programs. The effect appeared to be larger for girls, consistent with laboratory evidence indicating greater sensitivity in female fetuses to maternal iodine deficiency [78]. In line with these findings, a study from the Chinese famine (1959–1961) reaffirms that exposure to nutritional adversity in early life may have larger long-term consequences for women than for men, manifested as increased likelihood of disability and illiteracy. However, the authors highlight that results can be confounded by factors such as excess male mortality and cultural dynamics such as son preference [79].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. The virtuous spiral of intergenerational health effects.

Fig abbreviations: IMR: infant mortality rate, IUGR: Intrauterine growth restriction, LBW: low birth weight, CVD: cardiovascular disease, IGT: impaired glucose tolerance, DM2: diabetes mellitus type 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120.g002

Substantial literature indicates that lower maternal height, as a proxy for maternal health in early life and childhood, is associated with worse child health and nutrition [38, 80–83], particularly for shorter women born in poorer socioeconomic conditions [84]. A pooled analysis using data from of five cohorts found that height of mothers is associated with their children’s birth weight, height, and conditional height based on previous growth [81]. Some studies show similar effects of paternal height, but the association is not as strong [80]. Researchers found significant relationships between parental and child health during the first three years of life by using various health criteria, including anthropometric measures, information on health disorders, and “self-rated” health reports from a German panel dataset, and controlling for parental income, education, and family composition. Cross-sectional findings from German mothers and children suggest that parental health tends to be transmitted to the child via the mother [85].

The health of a mother can affect the health of subsequent generations. A U.S. study found that grandmother’s stature and mother’s birth weight were the strongest predictors of the mother’s stature, which in turn has implications for the birth weight of their children [86]. Currie and Moretti found that low maternal birth weight is associated with low birth weight among offspring, even among mothers who are sisters and therefore exposed to similar genetic material and environment [87]. Interestingly, the intergenerational transmission of low birth weight is stronger for mothers in high-poverty zip codes in the western U.S. and is also associated with subsequently lower socioeconomic status [87]. Several studies have shown that stunted children have lower school performance and are less productive as adults than nonstunted children in adulthood [66, 88, 89], offering strong arguments for improving women’s nutritional status as a tool to break the cycle of poverty.

Maternal Orphans and Health.

The presence of a mother is an important protective factor for child survival; studies in LMICs have found an increased mortality risk for children following a mother’s death [90–92]. A cohort study from Matlab, Bangladesh, showed that the cumulative probability of children surviving to their tenth birthday was 24% for children whose mothers died, while the effect of paternal death before child survival was negligible [92]. Studies from South Africa, Kenya and Indonesia indicate that maternal orphans are less likely to be enrolled in school than paternal orphans, but the impact seems to differ between countries [93–96]. A Tanzanian study did not find as large differences in schooling attainment between maternal and paternal orphans, but did find that maternal orphans have 15% lower height [97].]. Maternal orphanhood is also associated with increased sexual risk behaviors, prevalence of sexually transmitted infections, and poor mental health in children [98–102].

Maternal Mental Health.

Maternal mental health and disorders affect the production of future human capital through increased risk of poor child health, including neonatal mortality, low birth weight, later stunting, and diarrheal disease [103–113]. However, the evidence is mixed and seems to depend on setting and study design. Findings from India [104], Pakistan [108–110], Brazil [106], and Bangladesh [111, 112] suggest negative effects of maternal mental disorders on child health, but have not been replicated in studies from African countries [113–118], Taiwan [119], the U.S., or Brazil [104, 120–122]. In a systematic review, Surkan et al. find varying results across studies, but their meta-analysis concludes that maternal depression was associated with early childhood underweight and stunting. However, this conclusion was based upon studies that differed in study designs, was conducted in a wide range of locations and included children of different ages. [123].

Although the evidence is mixed when it comes to common mental disorders, it is clearer when looking at severe mental disorders, like psychosis and schizophrenia [118]. Offspring of mothers with these diseases have higher morbidity and mortality, suggesting a possible dose-dependent response to accumulation of risk that affects child development [124].

Studies from high-income countries show that maternal mental illness has negative effects for offspring health, behavior, and psychosocial functioning [125–128]. The extent to which societies and cultures have different coping mechanisms and social support to look after the child when a mother (or father) falls ill will probably affect how much maternal mental health affects child health and wellbeing. Interestingly, a U.S. study shows that high paternal involvement does not compensate for the mother’s health problems [129].

Age of Childbearing.

Maternal age seems to affect child health outcomes, wherein the youngest and oldest age groups have poorer outcomes. Gibbs et al. conclude in their meta-analysis that young maternal age increases the risks of low birth weight and preterm birth, though the overall evidence of the effect is moderate [130]. A study looking at adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in 850,000 Latin American women found the risk of dying from pregnancy-related causes to be four times higher for adolescents under 16 years old than for women in their early twenties [131]. A South African study investigated the social and economic consequences of teenage motherhood and found large educational attainment deficits in teen mothers, with earlier births associated with greater deficits [132]. Studies indicate that household characteristics may explain poorer pregnancy outcomes for young mothers, but the degree of impact differs between settings [133–134].

Studies from Canada and South Africa looked at long-term consequences for children born to teenage mothers, showing negative impacts on educational achievement, life satisfaction, and personal income later in life [135, 136]. In a 55-country study based on data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), Finlay at al. find that women who have their first birth between the ages of 27 and 29 have the lowest risk of poor child health outcomes. They note that both biological and social mechanisms determine why children of young mothers have poorer health outcomes [137]. The factors that co-vary with both age and child outcomes differ by countries and by urban/rural location within a country and require further study.

In addition to being a health risk for both the mother and the child, teenage childbearing imposes a sizable economic burden in terms of potential productivity gains [138]. If young girls had delayed pregnancy, attained higher education, and been employed the opportunity costs can be high; from 1% (China) to 30% (Uganda) of gross domestic product (GDP) [138].

Similar difficulties appear in the literature surrounding the consequences of birth spacing. A meta-analysis from 2006 examines the association between birth spacing and the relative risk of low birth weight, being born small for gestational age, and preterm birth. The study finds that inter-pregnancy intervals shorter than 6 months, between 6 to 17 months, and longer than 59 months are associated with significantly greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes [139]. A long-term study using data from Matlab, Bangladesh, finds that the risk of infant mortality is significantly increased when inter-pregnancy intervals are short [140].

Education and Women’s Health

The effect of improved women’s health on education works primarily through fertility and intergenerational health channels, as discussed previously. However, looking at school achievement and economic productivity, the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP) studies found that nutritional supplementation increased years of schooling significantly (by 1.2 grades) for women, but not for men [141]. Both men and women exposed to Atole, the nutritious supplement, within the first two years of life showed improved comprehension and intelligence scores, independent of schooling [142]. Another effect of Atole exposure was a 46% increase in average wages for men, but not for women; one explanation for the difference is that fewer women than men engaged in income-generating activities [143]. In Sri Lanka, Jayachandran and Lleras-Muney find a dramatic reduction in maternal mortality risk (70%) between 1946 and 1953 to be associated with increased investments in girls’ education [144]. Using Chinese data, Sun et al. estimate that a 0.1% decline in the maternal mortality rate would reduce the female illiteracy rate by 6.1–12.8% [145]. A study from rural Pakistan indicates that improved nutritional status increased school enrollment for children, in particular among girls, thereby reducing the gender gap in school enrollment [146].

Productivity and Women’s Health: Labor Force Participation and Economic Return

Poor health among women has not only generational repercussions, but also implications for contemporaneous labor force participation, productivity, earnings, family income, and economic wellbeing. When looking at labor force participation, a longitudinal study from Australia found that having diabetes, high blood pressure, or psychiatric conditions decreased the likelihood of women’s employment [147]. Globally, only 52% of the world’s adult women participate in the labor market, 26% lower than men. Childbearing, illness, and complications from pregnancy and delivery predispose women for absence from work. The prevalence of traditional gender roles also prevents women from joining the labor market, as they are often allocated the time-consuming task of child-rearing [148]. Interventions that improve safety in pregnancy and delivery, together with fertility reductions, are shown to increase female labor force participation. Albanesi and Olivetti find that reduced maternal mortality and access to high-quality infant formula in the U.S. enabled women to engage in both paid work and in the duties of motherhood, resulting in a 52% rise in work participation among women aged 23–33 years between 1920 and 1970 [149]. A modeling study from the WHO African Region (AFRO) estimates that reducing maternal deaths could result in a significant economic return: each maternal death decreases per capita GDP by US$0.36 per year [150].

Improved health, in particular improved nutrition, boosts economic returns through increased productivity. In China, a group of researchers estimated that the reduction in goiters from 1992–2001 increased the net present value of future economic productivity by 142 billion yuan (roughly US$23 billion at the June 2014 exchange rate, estimates by authors of this study) and that a continued reduction of the goiter rate to 5% over the next 10 years would result in future, additional productivity gains with a value of 40 billion yuan. The reduction in prevalence of child stunting from 32.7% to 14.4% is estimated to have resulted in economic productivity gains with a net value of an additional 101 billion yuan [151]. Because micronutrient deficiencies constitute a higher burden in women than in men, in particular iron deficiency anemia among women of reproductive age [10], improving these deficiencies can have a major positive impact on both the productivity of the targeted generation and on the cognitive development and later productivity of generations to come.

Health and productivity are positively related for both men and women. Nevertheless, female farmers have, on average, 20–30% lower productivity than male farmers, and female entrepreneurs also exhibit lower productivity [148]. The factors influencing female and male productivity are complex and varied, and include differences in education, time allocation between domestic and income-generating work, and access to the formal labor market [148]. One important determinant might be poor health and the higher burden of nutritional deficiencies in women than in men [152]. An intervention study in India looked at the effects of multi-micronutrient supplements on female tea pickers and found a significant increase in labor productivity [153]. Anemic adolescent girls in India have poorer results in memory tests, reduced work capacity, and lower cognitive function than their non-anemic counterparts [154].

A study from Colombia suggests that a one-centimeter increase in mean height would lead to a 12% increase in earnings for men but only a 4.7% increase for women [155]. Studies of HIV treatment indicate that antiretroviral treatment (ART) can lead to improvements in worker productivity, but the literature indicates different impacts between men and women [156–158]. A micro-level study shows an intergenerational effect: adult deaths increase the likelihood of labor force participation among male and female adolescents, with a greater negative effect on females that leads to decreased female school enrollment [156].

ART has led to massive health gains for HIV patients, and these health benefits have the potential to significantly improve economic wellbeing [157], but whether ART can reverse the declines in labor productivity that typically follow severe disease is still debatable. This is a critical inquiry because labor is the central productive asset of the poor in many LMICs. A study from Western Kenya found a 20% increased likelihood of participation in the labor force six months after ART initiation along with a 35% (7.9 hours) increase in weekly hours worked [158]. Treatment effects for women were primarily on the extensive margin—indicating that they either leave or enter the labor force—while the treatment effects for men are on the intensive margin, meaning they can work more hours. Much of this gender difference is probably due to differences in domestic time allocation, which is a determinant for children’s school enrollment and continuation [158]. In another study of tea pickers, also from Western Kenya, Larson et al. confirm that women tend to benefit from ART on the extensive margin [159].

Measuring formal labor might therefore not capture the true productivity effects of ART uptake. Cultural and social gender norms influence how poorer health might affect productivity among women and men differently [148]. In particular, more traditional gender roles correlate negatively with labor force participation, as the impact of ART for women tends to be on the extensive margin. However, the possible importance of this should not be underestimated, especially when examining time allocation for domestic chores. Providing ART and improving the health of mothers improves children’s educational attainment, in particular that of girls, because they do not have to drop out of school to assume the burden of domestic work. Despite the challenges of capturing the whole picture, increasing access to health services for women has been shown effective in improving the health and thereby productivity of the population.

Savings and Women’s Health

Little evidence exists on the role of women’s health on savings, but maternal complications and death can negatively impact household finances. Out-of-pocket expenditures often cover most health care costs in poor households [91, 160, 161], and the consequences of women falling sick include lost productivity during illness, increased debt, and reduced savings, pushing poor or already marginal households further into poverty [91, 161, 162].

Discussion

Most studies included are cross-sectional correlational studies describing associations, with only a limited number of long-term and experimental studies published. The cross-sectional studies have in particular identified important intergenerational associations, but further studies are needed to understand potential causal relationships. Previous literature reviews have focused on particular aspects of economic development [15–18], while this review takes a life span approach and has selected studies from a holistic view, including women’s reproductive, sexual, physical and mental health. While the majority of the literature defines women’s health as limited to reproductive health, we identify how women’s overall health relates to economic development. We attempt a broader understanding of women’s health that expands the economic importance of women beyond reproduction. Our review captures the relevance of women’s mental health and acknowledges intergenerational effects as economic outcomes.

Our study used a comprehensive search strategy drawing from ten databases in different academic fields. Each paper was assessed for bias, as reported in S2 Appendix. Nevertheless, there may remain reporting biases in the original literature on women’s health and economic development [19]. Our restriction to English-language publications may have excluded important literature in other languages. Thorough application of well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, independent screening by two authors, and use of the tested extraction table increase the reliability of our results. While other researchers might interpret some of the study results differently, we argue that our rigorous methodology would support another team achieving similar results when using the same approach.

The cross-disciplinary nature of our review is one of its strengths, but we were surprised to see a strict divide and lack of cross-referencing between the health and the economic literatures. As we believe cross-disciplinary work can promote more efficient use of existing knowledge, disciplinary silos should be avoided. Further studies of the benefits of specific health investments should consider literature from the economic, development, gender, and health fields,. We hope that this literature review can be a starting point for such cross-disciplinary endeavors.

Women’s health is linked to our understandings of women from biological and societal perspectives, by focusing on “sex” or on “gender.” The majority of the literature included examined women’s health from a biological perspective, with little emphasis on the social constructs that shape our understanding of gender roles [163].

Most studies reviewed describe the costs of poor health in women—in particular the costs of poor maternal health—while a minority of the studies describe how health investments lead to economic benefits. New studies should aim for long-term and experimental designs to better understand the potential causal pathways. However, the associations found in this study are important for health policy today, as they indicate important linkages between women’s health and economic outcomes.

In general, evidence providing economic justification for investments in women’s health tend to focus on reproductive health, investigating the implications of women’s reproductive rather than productive roles [15–18]. Looking at the limited number of studies comparing productivity by gender, healthy men appear to be more productive than healthy women, but the impact of ill health affects both men and women. Gender roles vary in different countries, and men’s productivity is most highly valued in those societies where males are the traditional breadwinners. But in a long-term consideration of the impacts on fertility, health, and education benefits for future generations, women’s health and accompanying productivity must receive more attention.

Most of the literature on the broader benefits of investing in women’s health investigates intergenerational effects, productivity, and education. Most studies of the effect of health on productivity try to quantify an increase in manual labor input or output in traditional societies with larger gender inequities. Further study is needed in settings with smaller inequities and higher opportunity costs for women to be outside the formal labor force. The lack of studies about the relationship between women’s health and savings indicates a need for further investigation. Research from townships in South Africa shows that grandmothers tend to save relatively more of their retirement pensions than grandfathers and invest more of the savings in their granddaughters [164]. Some hypothesize that women have a greater propensity to save than men and that those savings are distributed to the family [165–169].

Good health among women is important for child development and the production of future human capital. Benefits from reproductive health investment, including access to contraceptives and abortion, can yield high gains for the women themselves, their families, and their societies. When it comes to the direct contribution of a woman’s health to economic development in her own generation, the literature is suggestive, but not decisive, and highly contextual. As the conclusions of this review are based on studies in low-, middle-, and high-income countries, this strengthens the generalizability of the review. However, contextualized analysis that accounts for cultural factors is needed, as the status of women differs among and within countries [170].

Our study describes spillovers from investments in women’s health that are not covered in current cost-effectiveness analyses. By using cost-benefit analysis for women’s health and other health outcomes, we may better capture the true economic benefits of health improvements and interventions. Though this study does not capture the costs and benefits of all interventions with regard to women’s health or provide quantitative cost-benefit analysis for policy makers, our findings point toward investments in the health of girls and women as a potent development opportunity for current and future generations.

Conclusion

Our multidisciplinary and robust systematic review of existing literature on women’s health and economic development supports four main conclusions. First, healthier women contribute to better-educated and more productive societies. Second, ensuring women’s control over their own fertility can boost the pace of economic growth and development. Third, maternal health is crucial to the health and economic wellbeing of subsequent generations through intergenerational spillovers. Fourth, further study is needed on women’s health and household and societal productivity.

In the short-term perspective, men are often the family breadwinners, and their health is therefore perceived as vital for family welfare. However, in the long-term perspective, women’s health is fundamental for the health and development of future generations [171].

Previous research has focused on the importance of women’s health based on human rights and social equity theories. This study demonstrates that women’s health is tied to productivity: how nations develop and perform depends upon how the country educates and provides opportunities for its women. The studies reviewed herein are generally consistent with the view that strong links exist among deliberate family planning; the health of the mother before, during, and after birth; and the health and productivity of the next generation, a self-perpetuating cycle of societal development. Mothers give birth to the workforce of the next generation, and physically and emotionally healthy workers tend to be more productive workers. How health affects the productivity of men and women differently needs further attention, which a growing body of literature reveals is a worthy pursuit. These results demonstrate the necessity and efficacy of investment in initiatives that address women’s health. Societies that invest in women’s health will likely have better overall population health and will remain more productive for generations to come.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Appendix. Review Protocol: Economic benefits of investing in women’s health: A systematic review.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Extraction table: Articles in included in the systematic review.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Appendix. PRIMA Checklist: Economic Benefits of Investing in Women’s Health: A systematic Review.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120.s003

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

Carol Ann Mita at the Countway Library of Medicine provided technical assistance in the development of the search algorithm. We thank Tora Estep, Alyssa Lubet, Elizabeth Mitgang, and Marija Ozololins for extremely helpful assistance preparing and editing the manuscript. We thank four anonymous peer reviewers for their very helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper. Finally, we thank the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) for providing generous financial support for this study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KHO JHI DEB. Performed the experiments: KHO JHI. Analyzed the data: KHO JHI. Wrote the paper: KHO JHI DEB.

Citation: Onarheim KH, Iversen JH, Bloom DE (2016) Economic Benefits of Investing in Women’s Health: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0150120. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150120

References

1. Bloom DE, Fink G. The economic case for devoting public resources to health. In Manson’s tropical diseases 2014, 23rd edition, Farrar J, et al., editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 23–30.

2. Bank World. World development report 1993: Investing in health. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1993.

3. United Nations Population Fund. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development: Programme of action. Cairo: UNFPA; 1994.

4. World Health Organization. Macroeconomics and health: Investing in health for economic development. In Report of the commission on macroeconomics and health, Sachs J.D., editor. Geneva: WHO; 2001.

5. Bloom DE, Canning D, Hu L, Liu Y, Mahal A, Yip W. The contribution of population health and demographic change to economic growth in China and India. J Comp Econ 2010; 38(1): 17–33. pmid:20419074

6. Bloom DE, Canning D, Jamison DT. Health, wealth, and welfare. Finance & Development 2004; 41(1): 10–15.

7. Bloom DE, Canning D, Sevilla J. The effect of health on economic growth: A production function approach. World Development 2004; 32(1): 1–13.

8. Jamison DT, Summers LH, Alleyne G, Arrow KJ, Berkley S, Binagwaho A, et al. Global health 2035: A world converging within a generation. The Lancet 2013; 382(9908): 1898–1955.

9. Bloom DE,Canning D. The health and wealth of nations.Science 2000; 287(5456): 1207. pmid:10712155

10. Murray CJ, ed. The global burden of disease: Generating evidence, guiding policy. Seattle, Washington: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation; 2013.

11. Wang HD, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Lofgren KT, Rajaratnam JK, Marcus JR, Levin-Rector A, et al. Age-specific and sex-specific mortality in 187 countries, 1970–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 2012; 380(9859): 2071–2094.

12. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 2012; 380(9859): 2163–2196.

13. World Health Organization. Health and women: Today's evidence tomorrow's agenda, Geneva, WHO; 2009.

14. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet 2014; 384(9947):980–1004.

15. Wilhelmson K., Gerdtham U-G. Impact on economic growth of investing in maternal-newborn health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

16. Grepin K., Klugman J. Closing the deadly gap between what we know and what we do: Investing in women’s reproductive health. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2013.

17. Gill K., Pande R, Malhotra A. Women deliver for development. The Lancet 2007; 370(9595): 1347–1357.

18. The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health. The economic benefits of investing in women’s and children’s health. N.a.C.H., PMNCH Knowledge Summary #24, Geneva: WHO; 2013.

19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097. pmid:19621072

20. Bloom DE, Canning D, Sevilla J. The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change RAND 2002;, MR-1274, Santa Monica, California.

21. Ashraf QH, Weil DN, Wilde J.The effect of interventions to reduce fertility on economic growth. Working paper no. 17377. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011.

22. Bloom DE, Humair S, Rosenberg L, Sevilla JP, Trussell J. Capturing the demographic dividend: Source, magnitude, and realization. In One billion people, one billion opportunities, Soucat A. and Ncube M., editors. Washington, D.C.: Communications Development Incorporated; 2014.

23. Goldin C, Katz LF. The power of the pill: Oral contraceptives and women's career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy 2002; 110(4): 730–770.

24. Bailey MJ. Fifty years of family planning: New evidence on the long-run effects of increasing access to contraception." Working paper no. 19493. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2013.

25. Bailey MJ. More power to the pill: The impact of contraceptive freedom on women's lifecycle labor supply. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2006; 121 (1): 289–320.

26. Bailey MJ. 'Momma's got the pill': How Anthony Comstock and Griswold v. Connecticut shaped U.S. childbearing. American Economic Review 2010: 100(1): 98–129.

27. Jamieson DJ, Buescher PA. The effect of family planning participation on prenatal care use and low birth weight. Fam Plann Perspect 1992; 24(5): 214–8. pmid:1426183

28. Pop-Eleches C. The impact of an abortion ban on socioeconomic outcomes of children: Evidence from Romania. Journal of Political Economy 2006; 114(4): 744–773.

29. Ananat E.O, Gruber J, Levine PB, Staiger D. Abortion and selection. Working paper no. 12150. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2006.

30. Kalist DE. Abortion and female labor force participation: Evidence prior to Roe v. Wade. Journal of Labor Research 2004; 25(3): 503–514.

31. Bloom DE, Canning D, Fink G, Finlay JE. Fertility, female labor force participation, and the demographic dividend. Journal of Economic Growth 2009; 14(2): 79–101.

32. Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. The Lancet 2012; 380(9837): 165–71.

33. Chaudhuri A. Spillover impacts of a reproductive health program on elderly women in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 2009; 30(2): 113–125.

34. Phillips JF, Jackson EF, Bawah AA, MacLeod B, Adongo P, Baynes C, et al. The long-term fertility impact of the Navrongo project in northern Ghana. Stud Fam Plann 2012; 43(3): 175–90. pmid:23185861

35. Miller G. Contraception as development? New evidence from family planning in Colombia.The Economic Journal 2010; 120(545): 709–736.

36. Almond D, Currie J, Herrmann M. From infant to mother: Early disease environment and future maternal health. Labour Economics 2012; 19(4): 475–483.

37. Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R, Richter L, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: Consequences for adult health and human capital. The Lancet 2008; 371(9609): 340–357.

38. Bhalotra S, Rawlings SB. Intergenerational persistence in health in developing countries: The penalty of gender inequality? Journal of Public Economics 2011; 95(3–4): 286–299.

39. Martorell R. Physical growth and development of the malnourished child: Contributions from 50 years of research at INCAPP." Food and Nutrition Bulletin 2010; 31(1): 68–82. pmid:20461905

40. Chen J, Millar WJ. Birth outcome, the social environment and child health. Health Rep 1999; 10(4): 57–67(ENG); 59–71(FRE). pmid:10607413

41. Kahn RS, Wilson K, Wise PPH. Intergenerational health disparities: Socioeconomic status, women's health conditions, and child behavior problems. Public Health Reports 2005; 120(4): 399–408. pmid:16025720

42. Barker DJ. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 1994; 311(6998): 171–4.

43. Barker DJ, Thornburg KL, Osmond C, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. Beyond birthweight: The maternal and placental origins of chronic disease. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2010 1(6): 360–364. pmid:25142007

44. Roseboom TJ, van der Meulen JH, Ravelli AC, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Bleker OP. Effects of prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine on adult disease in later life: An overview. Twin Res 2001; 4(5): 293–8. pmid:11869479

45. van Abeelen AF, Elias SG, Bossuyt PM, Grobbee DE, van der Schouw YT, Roseboom TJ, et al. Cardiovascular consequences of famine in the young. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(4): 538–45. pmid:21868476

46. van Abeelen AF, Elias SG, Bossuyt PM, Grobbee DE, van der Schouw YT, Roseboom TJ, et al. Famine exposure in the young and the risk of type 2 diabetes in adulthood. Circulation 2012; 125(10): 2255–2260.

47. Li Y, He Y, Qi L, Jaddoe VW, Feskens EJ, Yang X, et al. Exposure to the Chinese famine in early life and the risk of hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes in adulthood. Diabetes 2010; 59(10): 2400–6. pmid:20622161

48. Lindeboom M, Portrait F, van den Berg GJ. Long-run effects on longevity of a nutritional shock early in life: The Dutch Potato famine of 1846–1847. J Health Econ 2010; 29(5): 617–29. pmid:20663577

49. Almond D, Edlund L, Li H, Zhang J. Long-term effects of the 1959–1961 China famine: Mainland China and Hong Kong. Working paper no. 13384. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2007.

50. Chen Y, Zhou LA. The long-term health and economic consequences of the 1959–1961 famine in China. J Health Econ 2007; 26(4): 659–81. pmid:17289187

51. Neelsen S, Stratmann T. Effects of prenatal and early life malnutrition: Evidence from the Greek famine. J Health Econ 2011; 30(3): 479–88. pmid:21546107

52. Hult M, Tornhammar P, Ueda P, Chima C, Bonamy AK, Ozumba V, et al. Hypertension, diabetes, and overweight: Looming legacies of the Biafran famine. Plos One 2010; 5(10): e13582. pmid:21042579

53. Katz J, West KP, Khatry SK, Christian P, LeClerq SC, Pradhan EK, et al. Risk factors for early infant mortality in Sarlahi district, Nepal. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003; 81(10): 717–725. pmid:14758431

54. Marchant T, Schellenberg JA, Nathan R, Abdulla S, Mukasa O, Mshinda H, et al. Anaemia in pregnancy and infant mortality in Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health 2004; 9(2): 262–6. pmid:15040564

55. Osman NB, Challis K, Cotiro M, Nordahl G, Bergström S. Perinatal outcome in an obstetric cohort of Mozambican women. J Trop Pediatr 2001; 47(1): 30–8. pmid:11245348

56. Rondo PH, Abbott R, Rodrigues LC, Tomkins AM. The influence of maternal nutritional factors on intrauterine growth retardation in Brazil. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 1997; 11(2): 152–166. pmid:9131708

57. Sethuraman K. The role of women's empowerment and domestic violence in child growth and undernutrition in a tribal and rural community in south India. UNU WIDER Research Paper, Research Paper No. 2008/15: 1–27.

58. Walker SP, Ewan-Whyte C, Chang SM, Powell CA, Fletcher H, McDonald D, et al. Factors associated with size and proportionality at birth in term Jamaican infants. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 2003; 21(2): 117–126.

59. Gewa CA, Oguttu M, Yandell NS. Maternal nutrition in rural Kenya: Health and socio-demographic determinants and its association with child nutrition. Matern Child Nutr 2012; 8(3): 275–86. pmid:21624050

60. Baqui AH, Arifeen SE, Amin S, Black RE. Levels and correlates of maternal nutritional status in urban Bangladesh. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1994; 48(5): 349–57. pmid:8055851

61. Islam MA, Rahman MM, Mahalanabis D. Maternal and socioeconomic factors and the risk of severe malnutrition in a child: A case-control study. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994; 48(6): 416–24. pmid:7925224

62. Ramakrishnan U, Martorell R, Schroeder DG, Flores R. Role of intergenerational effects on linear growth. J Nutr 1999; 129(2S Suppl): 544S–549S. pmid:10064328

63. Black MM, Baqui AH, Zaman K, El Arifeen S, Black RE. Maternal depressive symptoms and infant growth in rural Bangladesh. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89(3): 951S–957S. pmid:19176729

64. Rahman M, Roy SK, Ali M, Mitra AK, Alam AN, Akbar MS. Maternal nutritional status as a determinant of child health. J Trop Pediatr 1993; 39(2): 86–8. pmid:8492369

65. Ramirez- Zea M, Melgar P, Rivera JA. INCAP Oriente longitudinal study: 40 years of history and legacy. Journal of Nutrition 2010; 140(2): 397–401. pmid:20032472

66. Martorell R, Habicht JP, Rivera JA. History and design of the INCAP longitudinal study (1969–77) and its follow-up (1988–89). Journal of Nutrition 1995; 125(4 SUPPL.): 1027S–1041S.

67. Schroeder DG, Martorell R, Rivera JA, Ruel MT, Habicht JP. Age differences in the impact of nutritional supplementation on growth.Journal of Nutr 1995; 125 (4 Suppl): 1051S–9S.

68. Rivera JA, Martorell R, Ruel MT, Habicht JP, Haas JD. Nutritional supplementation during the preschool years influences body size and composition of Guatemalan adolescents. Journal of Nutrition 1995; 125(4 Suppl): 1068S–77S. pmid:7722709

69. Behrman JR, Calderon MC, Preston SH, Hoddinott J, Martorell R, Stein AD. Nutritional supplementation in girls influences the growth of their children: Prospective study in Guatemala. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90(5): 1372–9. pmid:19793851

70. Cresswell JA, Campbell OM, De Silva MJ, Filippi V. Effect of maternal obesity on neonatal death in sub-Saharan Africa: Multivariable analysis of 27 national datasets. The Lancet 2012; 380(9850): 1325–30.

71. Steyn NP, Labadarios D, Nel J, Kruger HS, Maunder EM. What is the nutritional status of children of obese mothers in South Africa? Nutrition 2011; 27(9): 904–911. pmid:21367580

72. Tequeanes AL, Gigante DP, Assunção MC, Chica DA, Horta BL. Maternal anthropometry is associated with the body mass index and waist:height ratio of offspring at 23 years of age. J Nutr 2009; 139(4): 750–4. pmid:19211832

73. Subramanian SV, Ackerson LK, Smith GD. Parental BMI and childhood undernutrition in India: An assessment of intrauterine influence. Pediatrics 2010; 126(3): e663–71. pmid:20713473

74. Elshibly EM, Schmalisch G. The effect of maternal anthropometric characteristics and social factors on gestational age and birth weight in Sudanese newborn infants. BMC Public Health 2008; 8(1): 244.

75. Ozaltin E, Hill K, Subramanian SV. Association of maternal stature with offspring mortality, underweight, and stunting in low- to middle-income countries. JAMA 2010; 303(15): 1507–16. pmid:20407060

76. Dekker LH, Mora-Plazas M, Marín C, Baylin A, Villamor E. Stunting associated with poor socioeconomic and maternal nutrition status and respiratory morbidity in Colombian schoolchildren. Food Nutr Bull 2010; 31(2): 242–50. pmid:20707230

77. de Menezes RC, Lira PI, Leal VS, Oliveira JS, Santana SC, Sequeira LA, et al. Determinants of stunting in children under five in Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil. Revista De Saude Publica 2011; 45(6): 1079–1087. pmid:22124738

78. Field E, Robles O, Torero M. Iodine deficiency and schooling attainment in Tanzania. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2009: 1(4): 140–169.

79. Mu R, Zhang XB. Why does the Great Chinese Famine affect the male and female survivors differently? Mortality selection versus son preference. Economics & Human Biology 2011; 9(1): 92–105.

80. Mani S. Role of the household and community in determining child health. WIDER Research Paper 2007, Helsinki, 1–22.

81. Addo OY, Stein AD, Fall CH, Gigante DP, Guntupalli AM, Horta BL, et al. Maternal height and child growth patterns. J Pediatr 2013; 163(2): 549–54. pmid:23477997

82. Seid AK. Health and nutritional status of children in Ethiopia: Do maternal characteristics matter? Journal of Biosocial Science 2013; 45(2): 187–204. pmid:22856686

83. Lee J, Houser RF, Must A, de Fulladolsa PP, Bermudez OI. Disentangling nutritional factors and household characteristics related to child stunting and maternal overweight in Guatemala. Economics and Human Biology 2010; 8(2): 188–196. pmid:20541480

84. Bhalotra S, Rawlings S. Gradients of the intergenerational transmission of health in developing countries. Review of Economics and Statistics 2012; 95(2): 660–672.

85. Coneus K, Spiess CK. (The intergenerational transmission of health in early childhood—Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel study. Econ Hum Biol 2012; 10(1): 89–97. pmid:21507734

86. Emanuel I, Kimpo C, Moceri V. The association of grandmaternal and maternal factors with maternal adult stature. Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33(6): 1243–8. pmid:15256519

87. Currie J, Moretti E. Biology as destiny? Short- and long-run determinants of intergenerational transmission of birth weight. Journal of Labor Economics 2007; 25(2): 231–263.

88. Martorell R, Melgar P, Maluccio JA, Stein AD, Rivera JA. The nutrition intervention improved adult human capital and economic productivity. J Nutr 2010; 140(2): 411–4. pmid:20032473

89. Martorell R, Horta BL, Adair LS, Stein AD, Richter L, Fall CHD, et al. Weight gain in the first two years of life is an important predictor of schooling outcomes in pooled analyses from five birth cohorts from low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Nutrition 2010; 140(2): 348–354. pmid:20007336

90. Masmas TN, Jensen H, da Silva D, Høj L, Sandström A, Aaby P. Survival among motherless children in rural and urban areas in Guinea-Bissau. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93(1): 99–105. pmid:14989448

91. Yamin AE, Boulanger V, Falb KL, Shuma J, Leaning J. Costs of inaction on maternal mortality: Qualitative evidence of the impacts of maternal deaths on living children in Tanzania. PLoS One 2013; 8(8): e71674. pmid:23990971

92. Ronsmans C, Chowdhury ME, Dasgupta SK, Ahmed A, Koblinsky M. Effect of parent's death on child survival in rural Bangladesh: A cohort study. The Lancet 2010; 375(9730): 2024–31.

93. Case A, Ardington C. The impact of parental death on school outcomes: Longitudinal evidence from South Africa. Demography 2006; 43(3): 401–420. pmid:17051820

94. Evans DK, Miguel E. Orphans and schooling in Africa: A longitudinal analysis. Demography 2007; 44(1): 35–57. pmid:17461335

95. Yamano T. The long–term impacts of orphanhood on education attainment and land inheritance among adults in rural Kenya. Agricultural Economics 2007; 37(2–3): 141–149.

96. Gertler P, Levine D, Martinez S.The presence and presents of parents: Do parents matter for more than their money? Faculty working paper 2003; Haas School of Business: University of California, Berkeley.

97. Beegle K, De Weerdt J, Dercon S. Orphanhood and the long-term impact on children. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006; 88(5): 1266–1272.

98. Ainsworth M, Beegle K, Godlike K. The impact of adult mortality and parental deaths on primary schooling in north-western Tanzania. Journal of Development Studies 2005; 41(3): 412–439.

99. Shimamura Y, Carter M. Dynamics of educational attainment for orphaned children and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Malawi. Development Workshop Paper 2011; UC Davis, California.

100. Mishra V, Bignami-Van Assche S. Orphans and vulnerable children in high HIV prevalence countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Calverton, MD: Macro International; 2008.

101. Robertson L, Gregson S, Garnett GP. Sexual risk among orphaned adolescents: Is country-level HIV prevalence an important factor? AIDS Care 2010; 22(8): 927–938. pmid:20552462

102. Gregson S, Nyamukapa CA, Garnett GP, Wambe M, Lewis JJ, Mason PR, et al. HIV infection and reproductive health in teenage women orphaned and made vulnerable by AIDS in Zimbabwe. AIDS Care 2005; 17(7): 785–794. pmid:16120495

103. Parsons CE, Young KS, Rochat TJ, Kringelbach ML, Stein A. Postnatal depression and its effects on child development: A review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Br Med Bull 2012; 101(1): 57–79.

104. Harpham T, Huttly S, De Silva MJ, Abramsky T. Maternal mental health and child nutritional status in four developing countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59(12): 1060–4. pmid:16286495

105. Neggers Y, Goldenberg R, Cliver S, Hauth J. The relationship between psychosocial profile, health practices, and pregnancy outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85(3): 277–85. pmid:16553174

106. Santos DS, Goldenberg R, Cliver S, Hauth J. Maternal common mental disorders and malnutrition in children: A case-control study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2011; 46(7): 543–8. pmid:20401464

107. Witt WP, Wisk LE, Cheng ER, Hampton JM, Hagen EW. Preconception mental health predicts pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes: A national population-based study. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2012; 16(7): 1525–1541. pmid:22124801

108. Rahman A, Iqbal Z, Bunn J, Lovel H, Harrington R. Impact of maternal depression on infant nutritional status and illness: A cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61(9): 946–52. pmid:15351773

109. Rahman A, Bunn J, Lovel H, Creed F. Maternal depression increases infant risk of diarrhoeal illness: A cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2007; 92(1): 24–8. pmid:16966339

110. Rahman A, Lovel H, Bunn J, Iqbal Z, Harrington R. Mothers' mental health and infant growth: A case-control study from Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Child Care Health Dev 2004; 30(1): 21–7. pmid:14678308

111. Nasreen HE, Kabir ZN, Forsell Y, Edhborg M. Impact of maternal depressive symptoms and infant temperament on early infant growth and motor development: Results from a population based study in Bangladesh. J Affect Disord 2013; 146(2): 254–61. pmid:23063237

112. Nasreen HE, Kabir ZN, Forsell Y, Edhborg M. Low birth weight in offspring of women with depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy: A population based study in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2010; 10(1): 515.

113. Medhin G, Hanlon C, Dewey M, Alem A, Tesfaye F, Lakew Z, et al. The effect of maternal common mental disorders on infant undernutrition in Butajira, Ethiopia: The P-MaMiE study. BMC Psychiatry 2010; 10(1): 32.

114. Stewart RC, Umar E, Kauye F, Bunn J, Vokhiwa M, Fitzgerald M, et al. Maternal common mental disorder and infant growth: A cross-sectional study from Malawi. Maternal and Child Nutrition 2008; 4(3): 209–219. pmid:18582354

115. Tomlinson M, Cooper PJ, Stein A, Swartz L, Molteno C. Post-partum depression and infant growth in a South African peri-urban settlement. Child Care Health Dev 2006; 32(1): 81–6. pmid:16398794

116. Ross J, Hanlon C, Medhin G, Alem A, Tesfaye F, Worku B, et al. Perinatal mental distress and infant morbidity in Ethiopia: A cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2011; Ed 96(1): F59–64.

117. Servili C, Medhin G, Hanlon C, Tomlinson M, Worku B, Baheretibeb Y, et al. Maternal common mental disorders and infant development in Ethiopia: The P-MaMiE birth cohort. BMC Public Health 2010; 10(1): 693.

118. Hanlon C, Medhin G, Alem A, Tesfaye F, Lakew Z, Worku B, et al. Impact of antenatal common mental disorders upon perinatal outcomes in Ethiopia: The P-MaMiE population-based cohort study. Trop Med Int Health 2009; 14(2): 156–66. pmid:19187514

119. Chen YH,Tsai SY, Lin HC. Increased mortality risk among offspring of mothers with postnatal depression: A nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. Psychol Med 2011; 41(11): 2287–96. pmid:21524332

120. Conway KS, Kennedy LD. Maternal depression and the production of infant health. Southern Economic Journal 2004; 71(2): 260–286.

121. Ertel KA, Koenen KC, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW. Maternal depressive symptoms not associated with reduced height in young children in a U.S. prospective cohort study. Plos One 2010; 5(10): e13656. pmid:21048958

122. Surkan PJ, Ryan LM, Carvalho Vieira LM, Berkman LF, Peterson KE. Maternal social and pyschological conditions and physical growth in low-income children in Piaui, Northeast Brazil. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64(2): 375–88. pmid:17084498

123. Surkan PJ, Kennedy CE, Hurley KM, Black MM. Maternal depression and early childhood growth in developing countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 2011; 89(8): 608–15. pmid:21836759

124. Webb R, Abel K, Pickles A, Appleby L. Mortality in offspring of parents with psychotic disorders: A critical review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry 2005; 162(6): 1045–1056. pmid:15930050

125. Oyserman D, Bybee D, Mowbray C. Influences of maternal mental illness on psychological outcomes for adolescent children. J Adolesc 2002; 25(6): 587–602. pmid:12490177

126. Propper C, Rigg J, Burgess S. Child health: Evidence on the roles of family income and maternal mental health from a UK birth cohort. Health Econ 2007; 16(11): 1245–69. pmid:17311355

127. Zaslow MJ, Hair EC, Dion MR, Ahluwalia SK, Sargent J. Maternal depressive symptoms and low literacy as potential barriers to employment in a sample of families receiving welfare: Are there two-generational implications? Women Health 2001; 32(3): 211–51. pmid:11480894

128. Casey P, Goolsby S, Berkowitz C, Frank D, Cook J, Cutts D, et al.Maternal depression, changing public assistance, food security, and child health status. Pediatrics 2004; 113(2): 298–304. pmid:14754941

129. Allen-Meares P, Blazevski J, Bybee D, Oyserman D. Independent effects of paternal involvement and maternal mental illness on child outcomes. Social Service Review 2010; 84(1): 103–127.

130. Gibbs CM, Wendt A, Peters S, Hogue CJ (2012) The impact of early age at first childbirth on maternal and infant health. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26(Suppl 1): 259–84. pmid:22742615

131. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: Cross-sectional study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 192(2): 342–349. pmid:15695970

132. Rancchod VL, Leibbrandt D, Marteleto M. Estimating the effect of adolescent fertility on educational attainment in Cape Town using a propensity score weighted regression. In A Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit Working Paper, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 2011.

133. Ardington C, Menendez A, Mutevedzi T. Early childbearing, human capital attainment, and mortality risk. In A Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit Working Paper, SALDRU, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 2011.

134. Letamo G, Majelantle RG. Health implications of early childbearing on pregnancy outcome in Botswana: Insights from the institutional records. Social Science and Medicine 2001; 52(1): 45–52. pmid:11144916

135. Lipman EL, Georgiades K, Boyle MH. Young adult outcomes of children born to teen mothers: Effects of being born during their teen or later years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011; 50(3): 232–241 e4. pmid:21334563

136. Branson N, Ardington C, Lam D, Leibbrandt M. Trends in teenage childbearing and schooling outcomes for children born to teens in South Africa. In A Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit Working Paper, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 2013.

137. Finlay JE, Ozaltin E, Canning D. The association of maternal age with infant mortality, child anthropometric failure, diarrhoea, and anaemia for first births: Evidence from 55 low- and middle-income countries. BMJ Open 2011; 1(2): e000226. pmid:22021886

138. Chaaban J, Cunningham W. Measuring the economic gains of investing in girls, the girl effect dividend. Policy research working paper no 5753, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2011.

139. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295(15): 1809–23. pmid:16622143

140. DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A, Rahman M. The effects of birth spacing on pregnancy outcomes and infant and child mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh. Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston, Massachusetts, April 2, 2004, pp. 35.

141. Maluccio JA, Hoddinott J, Behrman JR, Martorell R, Quisumbing AR, Stein AD. The impact of improving nutrition during early childhood on education among Guatemalan adults. The Economic Journal 2009; 119(537): 734–763.

142. Stein AD, Wang M, DiGirolamo A, Grajeda R, Ramakrishnan U, Ramirez-Zea M, et al. Nutritional supplementation in early childhood, schooling, and intellectual functioning in adulthood: A prospective study in Guatemala. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162(7): 612–8. pmid:18606931

143. Hoddinott JM, Maluccio JA, Behrman JR, Flores R, Martorell R. Effect of a nutrition intervention during early childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults. The Lancet 2008; 371(9610): 411–6.

144. Jayachandran S, Lleras-Muney A. Life expectancy and human capital investments: Evidence from maternal mortality declines. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2009; 124(1): 349–397.

145. Sun WK, Wang XX, Ying XN. Does life expectancy affect private educational investment in China? China & World Economy 2012; 20(4): 37–55.

146. Alderman H, Behrman JR, Lavy V, Menon R. Child nutrition, child health, and school enrollment: A longitudinal analysis. World Bank Publications 1997; 97(21): 1–38.

147. Pit SW, Byles J. The association of health and employment in mature women: A longitudinal study. Journal of Womens Health 2012; 21(3): 273–280.

148. World Bank (2012) World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC.

149. Albanesi S, Olivetti C. Gender roles and medical progress. Working paper no. 14873. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2009.

150. Kirigia JM, Oluwole D, Mwabu GM, Gatwiri D, Kainyu LH. Effects of maternal mortality on gross domestic product (GDP) in the WHO African region. Afr J Health Sci 2006; 13(1–2): 86–95. pmid:17348747

151. Ross J, Chen CM, He W, Fu G, Wang YY, Fu ZY, et al. Effects of malnutrition on economic productivity in China as estimated by PROFILES. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2003; 16(3): 195–205. pmid:14631824

152. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 2012; 380(9859): 2095–2128.

153. Gopaldas T, Gujral S. A multinutrient package of iron, vitamin A, and iodine improved the productivity and earnings of women tea pickers in South India. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 2003; 24(2): 218–223. pmid:12891826

154. Sen A, Kanani SJ. Deleterious functional impact of anemia on young adolescent school girls. Indian Pediatrics 2006; 43(3): 219–226. pmid:16585816

155. Ribero R. Earnings effects of household investment in health in Colombia. Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper no. 810, New Haven, CT,. 1–21, 2000.

156. Yamauchi F, Buthelezi T, Velia M. Impacts of prime-age adult mortality on labour supply: Evidence from adolescents and women in South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2008; 70(3): 375–398.

157. Bor J, Herbst AJ, Newell ML, Bärnighausen T. Increases in adult life expectancy in rural South Africa: Valuing the scale-up of HIV treatment. Science 2013; 339(6122): 961–5. pmid:23430655

158. Thirumurthy H, Zivin JG, Goldstein M. The economic impact of AIDS treatment: Labor supply in western Kenya. Journal of Human Resources 2008; 43(3): 511–552. pmid:22180664

159. Larson BA, Fox MP, Bii M, Rosen S, Rohr J, Shaffer D, et al. Antiretroviral therapy, labor productivity, and sex: A longitudinal cohort study of tea pluckers in Kenya. AIDS 2013; 27(1): 115–123. pmid:23014516

160. Powell-Jackson T, Hoque ME. Economic consequences of maternal illness in rural Bangladesh. Health Economics 2012; 21(7): 796–810. pmid:21557382

161. Storeng KT, Baggaley RF, Ganaba R, Ouattara F, Akoum MS, Filippi V. Paying the price: The cost and consequences of emergency obstetric care in Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine 2008; 66(3): 545–557.

162. Hoque ME, Powell-Jackson T, Dasgupta SK, Chowdhury ME, Koblinsky M. Costs of maternal health-related complications in Bangladesh. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition 2012; 30(2): 205–212.

163. Krieger N. Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter? International Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 32(4), 652–657. pmid:12913047

164. Dufl E. Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old-age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review 2003; 17(1): 1–25.

165. Ashraf N. Spousal control and intra-household decision making: An experimental study in the Philippines. The American Economic Review 2009; 99(4): 1245–1277.

166. Duflo E, Udry C. Intra household resource allocation in Cote d'Ivoire: Social norms, separate accounts and consumption choices. Working paper no. w10498. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004.

167. Hoddinott J, Haddad LJ. Does female income share influence household expenditures? Evidence from Cote d'Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1995; 57(1): 77–96.

168. Thomas D. Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources 1990; 24(4): 635–664.

169. Skoufias E. PROGRESA and its impacts on the welfare of rural households in Mexico. Intl Food Policy Res Inst publication report, Washington DC: 1–139, 2005.

170. World Economic Forum, Harvard University, University of California. The global gender gap report 2013, Bekhouche Y., et al., editors. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2013.

171. Bloom DE, Kuhn M, Prettner K. The Contribution of Female Health to Economic Development Working paper no. 21411. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2015.