Transcriptional Regulation of the β-Type Carbonic Anhydrase Gene bca by RamA in Corynebacterium glutamicum

Abstract

Carbonic anhydrase catalyzes the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide to bicarbonate and maintains the balance of CO₂/HCO₃^- in the intracellular environment, specifically for carboxylation/decarboxylation reactions. In Corynebacterium glutamicum, two putative genes, namely the bca (cg2954) and gca (cg0155) genes, coding for β-type and γ-type carbonic anhydrase, respectively, have been identified. We here analyze the transcriptional organization of these genes. The transcriptional start site (TSS) of the bca gene was shown to be the first nucleotide “A” of its putative translational start codon (ATG) and thus, bca codes for a leaderless transcript. The TSS of the gca gene was identified as an “A” residue located at position -20 relative to the first nucleotide of the annotated translational start codon of the cg0154 gene, which is located immediately upstream of gca. Comparative expression analysis revealed carbon source-dependent regulation of the bca gene, with 1.5- to 2-fold lower promoter activity in cells grown on acetate as compared to glucose as sole carbon source. Based on higher expression of bca in a mutant deficient of the regulator of acetate metabolism RamA as compared to the wild-type of C. glutamicum and based on the binding of His-tagged RamA protein to the bca promoter region, we here present evidence that RamA negatively regulates expression of bca in C. glutamicum. Functional characterization of a gca deletion mutant of C. glutamicum revealed the same growth characteristics of C. glutamicum ∆gca as that of wild-type C. glutamicum and no effect on expression of the bca gene.

About the Authors:

Adnan Shah

Affiliation: Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany

Bernhard J. Eikmanns

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany

Introduction

Carbonic anhydrase (CA) (EC 4.2.1.1) catalyzes the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide (CO₂) to bicarbonate (HCO₃^-) and plays an important role in various biochemical and physiological processes in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms [1, 2]. CAs are ubiquitously found in eukarya, bacteria and archaea domains of life [2, 3, 4] and five genetically distinct CA families are known to date, namely the α-, β-, γ-, δ-, and ζ-CAs [5]. The α-class is predominant in mammals whereas the δ- and ζ-classes have been found in marine diatoms [6]. The β and γ are the ancient classes of CAs, predominantly found in prokaryotes and their presence in species of archaea and bacteria indicate their fundamental role in prokaryotic biology [6, 7, 8]. The bacterial β-CAs are zinc metalloenzymes that maintain CO₂/HCO₃^- balance in the intracellular environment [9, 10]. By keeping a given balance, the CAs also represent important “accessory enzymes” for other enzymes that use CO₂ or HCO₃^- [10], such as ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) in chloroplasts, carbamate hydro-lyase (cyanase) in Escherichia coli [11], urease in Helicobacter pylori [12] and HCO₃^--dependent carboxylases in a variety of eukaryotes and prokaryotes [10, 13–17]. In several bacteria, CA has been shown to be essential during aerobic growth under normal atmospheric conditions [14–17] and Ueda et al. [18] suggested that microorganisms that are lacking CA can persist in nature only by choosing niches with higher CO₂ concentrations.

Corynebacterium glutamicum is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic organism, able to use a variety of sugars, alcohols, and organic acids as carbon and energy source [19–21]. The organism has a long tradition in biotechnology and is used as an “industrial workhorse” for the production of amino acids, mainly L-glutamate and L-lysine [22, 23]. In addition, the use of C. glutamicum in the production of other amino acids [24–30], different organic acids [31–34], vitamins [35], diamines [36–40], ethanol and higher alcohols [41–45], 2-ketoacids [46–49], lycopene [50], and polymers [51, 52] has further widened the industrial importance of C. glutamicum. Besides, C. glutamicum is also regarded as a model organism for the Corynebacterineae, such as the genus Mycobacterium [53].

The PEP (phosphoenolpyruvate)-pyruvate-oxaloacetate node in C. glutamicum (Fig 1) has attracted specific attention due to its importance in carbon flux distribution within the central metabolism and in particular for supply of precursors required for the production of various amino acids (reviewed in [54, 4]), especially those of the aspartate and glutamate amino acid families. C. glutamicum possesses two C3-carboxylating anaplerotic enzymes, namely the PEP carboxylase and pyruvate carboxylase, converting phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and pyruvate to oxaloacetate, respectively [54]. Apart from these C3-carboxylating enzymes, C. glutamicum possesses three C4-decarboxylating enzymes, i.e., PEP carboxykinase, converting oxaloacetate to PEP, and oxaloacetate decarboxylase and malic enzyme, converting oxaloacetate and malate, respectively, to pyruvate (reviewed in [54]) (Fig 1). Whereas these decarboxylating enzymes [and also those of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle] liberate CO₂, the carboxylating PEP and pyruvate carboxylases require HCO₃^- as substrate [4, 17] which highlights the importance of intracellular CO₂/HCO₃^- balance for the central metabolism, especially the reactions at metabolic switch-points of carbon flux distribution. As HCO₃^- is needed as substrate of metabolism, its significant source is the hydration of CO₂. Due to the low tension of CO₂ in the environment and its diffusion out of the cell, the spontaneously formed HCO₃^- obviously is not sufficient to meet metabolic demands of the cell and thus, enzymatic hydration of CO₂ might be necessary, especially under conditions when the intracellular CO₂ generation is low [15, 17].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. The phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-pyruvate-oxaloacetate node in C. glutamicum.

Abbreviations: AK, acetate kinase; PTA, phosphotransacetylase; CA, carbonic anhydrase; CS, citrate synthase; ACN, aconitase; ICD, isocitrate dehydrogenase; OGDHC, oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex; ICL, isocitrate lyase; MS, malate synthase; MalE, malic enzyme; ODx, oxaloacetate decarboxylase; PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; PCx, pyruvate carboxylase; PEPCx, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; PEPCk, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154382.g001

In C. glutamicum, two genes putatively coding for beta-type CA (β-CA) and gamma-type CA (γ-CA) have been identified and designated as bca (locus-tag cg2954) and gca (cg0155), respectively [17]. The bca gene is located between mutY, encoding an adenine glycosylase, and cg2953, encoding putatively a benzaldehyde dehydrogenase. The gca gene is directly preceeded by cg0154, encoding also a so far unknown protein and followed by cysR, encoding the dual transcriptional regulator CysR, which is involved in control of sulfur metabolism in C. glutamicum [55]. Though, a gca-deficient mutant of C. glutamicum did not show any phenotype under all conditions tested, a bca-deletion mutant showed no growth under normal atmospheric conditions (0.04% CO₂) and this phenotype could be restored by increasing the CO₂ concentration to 5% or by introducing a heterologous CA gene [17]. These results indicate that bca is functional as CA in C. glutamicum, that the bca gene product is essential and that the gca gene product is dispensable for growth of this organism under “normal” atmospheric conditions.

In this report, we analyzed the transcriptional organization of the bca and gca genes and investigated the transcriptional regulation of bca expression in glucose- or acetate-grown cells of C. glutamicum. We also constructed a gca deletion mutant of C. glutamicum and investigated the effect on growth and on expression of the bca gene.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, oligonucleotides and culture conditions

All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study and their relevant characteristics and sources are given in Table 1, for oligonucleotides, their nucleotide sequence and purpose see S1 Table in the supplementary material.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study and their relevant characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154382.t001

E. coli was grown aerobically on 2×TY or TB complex medium [62] at 37°C as 5 ml-cultures in 15 ml-tubes or as 50 ml-cultures in 500 ml-baffled Erlenmeyer flasks on a rotary shaker at 120 rpm. Precultures of C. glutamicum were grown under the same conditions in 2×TY medium at 30°C. For preparation of solid plates, agar (18 g/l) was added to the medium. For the main cultures, cells of a C. glutamicum preculture were washed twice with 0.9% NaCl and added to freshly prepared minimal medium [63], containing 1% (w/v), 2% (w/v), 4% (w/v) glucose and/or 1% (w/v) acetate as carbon source(s). The cultures then were grown aerobically at 30°C as 50 ml-cultures in 500 ml baffled Erlenmeyer flasks on a rotary shaker at 120 rpm until the desired cell density was obtained. Plasmid-carrying strains were cultivated in the presence of kanamycin (50 μg/ml) or ampicillin (100 μg/ml). In fermentation experiments, the amino acid concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) as described before [26]. Growth of the E. coli and C. glutamicum cultures was followed by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀).

DNA preparation, manipulation and transformation

Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, Fast AP^TM thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase, DNase I, Maxima reverse transcriptase, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and the CloneJet^TM PCR Cloning Kit were obtained from Thermo Scientific (Darmstadt, Germany), Phusion^® DNA polymerase from New England Biolabs (Ipswitch, MA, USA), Taq DNA polymerase from Genaxxon Biosciences (Ulm, Germany), and used as instructed by the manufacturer. The RNeasy Mini Kit and the HotStar polymerase kit was obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany).

Plasmids from E. coli and C. glutamicum cells were isolated using the E.Z.N.A plasmid DNA Mini Kit (Omega Bio-tec Inc., Norcross, USA) or the method described in Green and Sambrook [62], respectively, and purified using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Chromosomal DNA was isolated from C. glutamicum [64] and purified with phenol-chloroform purification method [62].

PCR experiments were performed in a Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) using Phusion^® DNA or Taq DNA polymerase with oligonucleotides designed using the Clone Manager v.7 software and obtained from biomers.net (Ulm, Germany). All other reagents used for the PCR mix were obtained from Thermo Scientific. PCR products were purified using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit from Macherey-Nagel.

Plasmid transfer into C. glutamicum was carried out by electroporation with an Electroporator 2510 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), and the recombinant strains were selected on 2xTY medium [62] agar plates containing kanamycin (50 or 15 μg/ml), as described by van der Rest et al. [65]. Electroporation of E. coli was carried out with competent cells according to the method of Dower et al. [66]. The success of the transformation was verified by plasmid preparation and/or other analyses indicated below.

Cloning of the bca and gca promoter fragments

The promoter regions of the bca gene (position -500 to +20 with respect to the putative translational start site of bca) and of the gca gene (position -262 to +258 with respect to the putative translational start site of the upstream cg0154 gene) were amplified with primer pairs bca-promoter-fw/ -rev and gca-promoter-fw/ -rev, respectively. The two PCR products (i.e., the bca and gca promoter fragments) were separately ligated into the multiple cloning site of the promoter-probe vector pET2, upstream of the promoter-less cat reporter gene, encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT). The resulting plasmids pET2-P_bca and pET2-P_gca were transformed into E. coli DH5α cells, transformants were selected on 2xTY agar plates containing kanamycin. The success of the transformation was verified by plasmid preparation, restriction analysis, and sequence analysis (GATC Biotech, Konstanz, Germany) of the insert(s) in the isolated and purified plasmids, using vector-specific primers namely cm4 and pET-rev. Subsequently, the pET2-P_bca and pET2-P_gca plasmids were transformed into C. glutamicum by electroporation.

RNA isolation and determination of the transcriptional start site

Total RNA was isolated from C. glutamicum carrying pET2-P_bca or pET2-P_gca plasmids, the transcriptional start sites (TSSs) were determined by cDNA synthesis and 5’ “rapid amplification of cDNA-ends” (5’-RACE) with PCR [67].

The C. glutamicum strains were grown in minimal medium with glucose 1% (w/v) as carbon source and harvested at the mid-exponential growth phase (OD₆₀₀ of about 5) by centrifugation (4500 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C). The total RNA was isolated as described by Auchter et al. [64] and after DNase I treatment purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The cDNAs for the bca and gca genes were synthesized from purified total RNA by reverse transcription with pET2-specific primer cm5, using maxima reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, the cDNAs were subsequently tailed with poly-(A) at their 3ˊ-end with dATP. The poly-(A) tailed cDNAs then were amplified with primers oligo-(dT) and cm5, using the HotStar polymerase kit for PCR. The amplified PCR products were subsequently purified using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit and ligated into the pJET1.2/blunt vector of the CloneJet^TM PCR Cloning Kit with blunt end ligation according to the manufacturer’s instructions, resulting in plasmids pJET1.2-bca-RACE and pJET1.2-gca-RACE. For both the bca and gca promoters, plasmids of three independent clones were sequenced using pJET1.2 vector-specific primers (pJET-fw and pJET-rev), sequence analysis was performed using the NCBI database and Clone Manager v.7 software.

Enzyme Assays

For determination of specific CAT enzyme activities in cell extracts, C. glutamicum carrying pET2-P_bca or pET2-P_gca plasmid was grown in minimal medium containing glucose 1%, 2%(w/v) and/or acetate 1% (w/v) as carbon source, to the mid-exponential growth phase (OD₆₀₀ of about 5) and cultures were harvested by centrifugation (4500 rpm, 4°C, 10 minutes). For preparation of cell extracts, the cell pellets were dissolved in 1 ml of washing buffer (200 mM Tris/ HCl pH 7.8), added to screw cap tubes containing 250 μl of glass-beads (diameter 0.1 mm) (Sigma Aldrich) and cell disruption was carried out in a Precellys 24 at speed 6.5 for 30 seconds three times with cooling on ice for 5 minutes each time. The glass-beads and cell debris were removed by centrifugation (14000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C). Protein quantification was performed using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific) in 96 well PS-Microplates, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specific CAT enzyme activities in the extracts were determined by the method described by Gerstmeir et al. [68].

Over-production and purification of His₆-RamA protein

The His₆-RamA fusion protein was over-produced in E. coli BL21 (DE3) carrying pET28-ramA plasmid [58]. The culture was grown in 500 ml of TB medium in a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask and over-production of His₆-RamA fusion protein was induced by addition of Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; 1 mM final concentration) after the culture reached an OD₆₀₀ of 0.6 and was grown further for 4 hours to an OD₆₀₀ of about 5. The over-produced His-tagged RamA fusion protein was purified on an ÄKTA^TM purifier (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) with a HisTrap^TM HP column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) using loading buffer (NNIG-20: 50 mM NaH₂PO₄, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol (v/v), pH 8) and elution buffer (NNIG-500: 50 mM NaH₂PO_4, 300 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol (v/v), pH 7.8).

For identification and verification of the purified His₆-RamA, the protein sample was separated on a SDS-PAGE gel [69], the protein bands of interest were cut out of the gel (approximately 5 x 1.5 x 1 mm in size), and MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/ Ionization—Time Of Flight) analysis was performed as described by Gerstmeir et al. [68]. The MALDI-TOF analysis was done at the Forschungszentrum Jülich (Germany), the data obtained were analyzed using Mascot (PMF) Peptide mass fingerprint (http://www.matrixscience.com).

Promoter binding assays with His-tagged RamA protein

The binding of purified His-tagged RamA protein with the bca promoter fragment P_bca and its sub-fragments PF1, PF2 and PF3 was tested using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The fragment 1b (described in [58]) was used as negative control and an aceA-aceB intergenic fragment with known binding affinity for RamA [58] as positive control. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a negative protein control. The respective fragments were amplified by PCR with primers bca-promoter-fw and -rev, PF1-fw, PF2-fw, PF3-fw and bca-promoter-rev, 1b-fw and 1b-rev, and aceA-aceB intergenic-fw and aceA-aceB intergenic-rev, respectively. The products were purified using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit. In the binding assays, about 70 ng of the fragments (each) were incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature with varying concentrations (0 to 2 μg) of His-tagged RamA protein in a total of 20 μl reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris, 1 mM dithioerythritol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 μg Poly [d (I-C)] in 10% (v/v) glycerol. Afterwards, the mixture was separated on a 2% agarose gel in 1x TAE buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM acetate, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) at 70 volts and stained with ethidium bromide.

Construction of the gca deletion mutant in C. glutamicum

To construct a gca deletion mutant of C. glutamicum, the upper and lower regions (each 423 bp) of gca were generated by PCR using primer pairs Del-gca-upper-fw / -rev and Del-gca-lower-fw /–rev, respectively. The two products were purified using NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit and subsequently combined in a cross-over PCR [70], using primer pair Del-gca-upper-fw / Del-gca-lower-rev, resulting in a truncated version of the gca gene with an intragenic deletion of 422 bp. The truncated gca gene then was ligated into the vector pK19mobsacB, resulting in plasmid pK19mobsacB-Δgca. This plasmid was subsequently transformed into C. glutamicum. The replacement of the native gca (wild-type) gene with the truncated version in the genome of C. glutamicum was performed by homologous recombination (double crossover) according to the protocol described by Schäfer et al. [61]. The deletion/truncation of the chromosomal gca gene in the resulting C. glutamicum strain Δgca was confirmed by colony PCR using primers gca-promoter-fw and Del-gca-lower-rev.

Results

Transcriptional start sites of the bca and gca genes in C. glutamicum

The transcriptional start sites (TSSs) of the bca and gca genes were determined using 5'-RACE analysis. For this purpose, the promoter regions of both genes were amplified, ligated into promoter-probe vector pET2 in front of the cat reporter gene, and the resulting promoter-reporter fusion plasmids pET2-P_bca and pET2-P_gca, were transformed into C. glutamicum. The transformants were grown in minimal medium containing 1% (w/v) glucose and total RNA was isolated from cells harvested at the mid-exponential growth phase. cDNAs for the bca-cat and the gca-cat transcriptional fusions were synthesized, tailed with poly-(A), amplified and cloned into the pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector. For exact localization of the bca and gca TSSs, the amplified products were sequenced and analyzed.

As indicated in Fig 2A, the bca TSS was found to be the first nucleotide “A” of the putative translational start codon (ATG), indicating that the bca gene codes for a leader-less transcript and thus, lacks a 5'-untranslated region. Centered 10 bp upstream of the TSS, an AATAAT motif was observed, which is very similar to the -10 consensus sequence for C. glutamicum [71].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Transcriptional organization of the bca and gca genes in the genome of C. glutamicum.

Genomic loci, promoter fragments used and transcriptional start sites (TSSs) of the bca (A) and gca (B) genes in C. glutamicum. The TSSs were identified by the 5'-RACE method. The putative -10 regions, the annotated translational start codon (TSC) of bca and of cg0154 and ribosome binding site (RBS) of cg0154 are indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154382.g002

The TSS for gca was identified to be an “A” residue at position—20 relative to the first nucleotide of the putative translational start codon (ATG) of cg0154, the gene located upstream of the gca (Fig 2B). In accordance, it has previously been shown that cg0154 and gca genes are co-transcribed [72]. Centered 10 bp upstream of the cg0154-gca TSS, the motif TAGGCT was observed, which shows reasonable similarity to the -10 consensus [TA(C/T)AAT] sequence for C. glutamicum [71]. Six bp upstream of the putative cg0154 translational start, we observed an AGGAG motif, which represents an ideal ribosomal binding site for C. glutamicum [72].

Expression of the bca gene is subject to carbon source-dependent regulation

Using the C. glutamicum strains carrying plasmids pET2, pET2-P_bca and pET2-P_gca, we performed a comparative expression analysis of the bca and gca genes in cells grown in minimal medium with 1% (w/v) glucose or 1% (w/v) acetate with initial pH values at 6.8 and 6.3. Cultures were harvested at the mid-exponential phase of growth (OD₆₀₀ of about 5) and after cell disruption, the promoter activities were determined in the cell extracts by measuring the specific CAT activities. While the extracts from cells carrying the empty promoter-probe vector pET2 did not show any detectable CAT activity (< 0.01 U/mg protein), the extracts of the strains carrying the bca and gca promoters within pET2 showed activity and expression of bca also showed carbon source-dependent regulation (Table 2). The bca promoter activities were observed to be about 1.5- to 2-fold higher in extracts of glucose-grown cells as compared to that in extracts of acetate-grown cells. However, the gca promoter activities were very low, i.e., about 20-fold lower than that of the bca promoter in glucose- and in acetate-grown cells, indicating that expression of the gca gene in C. glutamicum is very low under the given conditions. Furthermore, it was observed that activities of the bca promoter were nearly the same on either glucose as carbon source on both pH values (6.3 and 6.8) or acetate as carbon source at both pH values (6.3 and 6.8) (Table 2). These results indicate that expression of the bca gene on either carbon source as well as carbon source-dependent regulation is independent of the initial pH 6.3 or 6.8.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Specific chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activities of different C. glutamicum strains carrying plasmids pET2-P_bca or pET2-P_gca, cultured in minimal medium containing 1% or 2% (w/v) glucose and/or 1% (w/v) acetate with initial pH values of 6.3 or 6.8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154382.t002

We also tested the bca promoter activity in cell extracts of the L-lysine-producing strain C. glutamicum DM1729 ΔilvB transformed with plasmid pET2-P_bca and grown in minimal medium containing 2% glucose. As can be seen in Table 2, the specific CAT activity was in the same range as in extracts of C. glutamicum wild-type. In accordance, L-lysine production by C. glutamicum DM1729 ΔilvB (pET2-P_bca) was in the same range as previously reported [59] for the parental strain C. glutamicum DM1729 ΔilvB, i.e., a final L-lysine concentration of about 32.3 mM after 24 h of incubation.

Global regulator RamA negatively regulates expression of the bca gene

Based on the results of carbon source-dependent expression control of the bca gene in C. glutamicum with glucose and acetate (see above), we speculated the regulator of acetate metabolism RamA [58] to be involved in this regulation. RamA is a LuxR-type global regulator, essential for growth on acetate or ethanol and is involved in expression control of a variety of genes in central carbon metabolism [73]. The involvement of RamA in bca expression was tested by comparative bca promoter activity analysis with the wild-type and a RamA-deficient derivative of C. glutamicum. For this purpose, plasmid pET2-P_bca was transformed into C. glutamicum ΔramA and the specific CAT activities of the resulting transformant and of C. glutamicum (pET2-P_bca) were determined in cell extracts after growth of the cells in minimal medium with either glucose 1% (w/v) or glucose plus acetate (1% each, w/v) and harvested at the mid-exponential growth phase (OD₆₀₀ of about 5). As shown in Table 2, the specific CAT activity and thus, the bca promoter activity in the ΔramA mutant was about 1.6-fold higher in minimal medium with glucose and about four-fold higher with glucose plus acetate when compared to that in wild-type cells of C. glutamicum. The higher activity of the bca promoter in the absence of a functional RamA protein indicates that RamA acts as a negative transcriptional regulator for the expression of the bca gene in C. glutamicum.

The most common RamA binding motifs have been identified as A/T/C-GGGG-N and A/T/C-CCCC-N [73]. As shown in Fig 3A, three such motifs were also observed in the sequence of the bca promoter region and therefore, it was likely that the RamA protein binds to the bca promoter region. To analyze the binding of RamA to the bca promoter region, a His-tagged RamA protein was over-produced in E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing the pET28-ramA construct, identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and used for EMSAs. For this purpose, the bca promoter fragment (P_bca) and its sub-fragments with only two, one or no RamA binding motifs (PF1, PF2 and PF3, respectively, as shown in Fig 3B), were incubated with varying amounts (0–2 μg) of purified His-tagged RamA protein and the assay mixture was separated on an agarose gel. An aceA-aceB inter-genic fragment was used as positive control fragment for binding of the His-tagged RamA protein, as the RamA protein was already known to bind to this region [58], while fragment 1b having no binding affinity for RamA [58] was used as negative control fragment in the EMSA experiments. As shown in Fig 3C, the bca promoter fragment P_bca with all three RamA binding motifs was retarded by the RamA protein and the retardation was observed to be proportional to increasing concentration of the His-tagged RamA protein. The PF1 fragment showed less retardation with 2 μg RamA, fragments PF2 and PF3 did not show significant retardation. These results show that RamA binds to the bca promoter region and indicates that the two distal RamA binding motifs are functional.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. The bca promoter sequence and EMSAs.

(A): Sequence of the bca promoter region (P_bca) with its potential RamA binding motifs (boxed and indicated above the sequence) in C. glutamicum. The transcriptional start point is indicated by a box and “+1”. (B): The bca promoter (P_bca) and its sub-fragments with exclusion of one, two and three RamA binding motifs in PF1, PF2 and PF3, respectively. (C): Representative EMSAs for binding assays using purified His- tagged RamA protein. The aceA-aceB inter-genic region was used as a positive control fragment (shown as PC) [58], fragment 1b [58] as a negative control fragment (shown as NC) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) as negative protein control. Lane–shows the respective fragment without protein whereas lanes 1, 2 and 3 show EMSAs using 0.8, 1.5 and 2 μg of His- tagged RamA, respectively, and lane 4 EMSAs using 2 μg of BSA instead of RamA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154382.g003

Taken together, the higher bca promoter activity in C. glutamicum ΔramA compared to that in the wild-type and binding of His-tagged RamA protein to the bca promoter fragment in the EMSA experiments showed that RamA negatively regulates the expression of the bca gene in C. glutamicum.

Expression of the bca gene not affected in the absence of a functional Gca protein

To test for a possible effect of Gca on growth and on expression of the bca gene, a gca deletion mutant of C. glutamicum was generated, using the suicide vector pK19mobsacB and homologous recombination. A mutant version of gca gene was constructed by amplifying and condensing the gca upper and lower fragments (each 423 bp), resulting in a truncated gca gene with an intragenic deletion of 422 bp, which was exchanged with the native chromosomal copy of gca. In minimal medium containing glucose 4% (w/v), the resulting strain C. glutamicum Δgca was observed to grow with the same growth rates and to the same final OD₆₀₀ as the wild-type C. glutamicum (data not shown), indicating that the gca gene is dispensable under the conditions tested. This result is consistent with the previous observation that gca is not essential for growth of C. glutamicum under normal conditions [17].

Plasmid pET2-P_bca was transformed into C. glutamicum Δgca and the activities of the bca promoter were determined by analysis of the specific CAT activities in crude cell extracts of cultures grown in minimal medium with glucose 1% (w/v). As shown in Table 2, the specific CAT activities in extracts of C. glutamicum Δgca were observed to be nearly the same as in the respective wild type derivative. This result indicates that there is no significant effect of the absence of a functional Gca protein on expression of the bca gene in C. glutamicum.

Discussion

In nature, CO₂ is in chemical equilibrium with HCO₃^-, carbonic acid and carbonate. Of these, CO₂ and its hydrated counterpart HCO₃^- are most important metabolites in living organisms as they serve as substrate or product in carboxylating and decarboxylation reactions, are involved in ion transport and internal pH regulation, regulate virulence and toxin formation in pathogenic bacteria and recently have been shown to be regulatory triggers of global transcriptional regulation and of microbial and mammalian production processes [74, 75, 4]. In aerobic (micro)organisms, CO₂ is the product of respiration and as such in sufficient amounts present within metabolically active cells. However, for anaplerotic (and also other) carboxylation reactions, the physiologically most important reactant is HCO₃^- [2, 15, 17]. As CO₂ (but not HCO₃^-) can diffuse out of the cell (for a recent review see [76]), the intracellular conversion of CO₂ to HCO₃^- is essential to retain CO₂ as genuine carboxylation substrate inside the cell. The chemical inter-conversion of CO₂ and HCO₃^- is relatively slow at physiological pH [77] and thus, nature has evolved enzymatic conversion by zinc-dependent CAs, catalyzing the reversible hydration of CO₂ with high turnover numbers and allowing the cells to maintain the intracellular balance of CO₂/HCO₃^- that is needed for cellular processes [2, 78, 79]. The role of CAs has intensively been studied in E. coli and other microorganisms, in particular in relation to CO₂/HCO₃^- balance in the intracellular environment under physiological conditions (for references see introduction) and it has been observed that under atmospheric conditions, inactivation of CA(s) is lethal or highly inhibitory unless the CO₂ content is increased to 5–10% [14–18, 80–82]. In spite of numerous studies on the physiological function of CAs in bacterial CO₂/HCO₃^- metabolism, there is much less information on the transcriptional organization and on expression control of the respective CA genes.

The purpose of this work was to broaden our knowledge about the transcriptional organization of the CA genes as well as expression analysis in relation to media composition (carbon sources) and transcriptional regulation in C. glutamicum. This organism is an industrial workhorse widely used for the production of amino acids and a variety of other metabolites [31, 32, 83, 84, 85, 86]. The PEP-pyruvate-oxaloacetate node of this organism (see Fig 1), being an important branch-point of carbon flux distribution and having a role in anaplerosis, gluconeogenesis and amino acid biosynthesis, involves several carboxylation/decarboxlation reactions and thus, a pivotal effect of the intracellular CO₂/HCO₃^- balance on the overall physiology of C. glutamicum can be presumed. Two CA genes, namely bca and gca, encoding β- and γ-CA, respectively, have previously been identified and bca has been shown to be essential under atmospheric conditions in C. glutamicum [17].

In this study, the TSS of the bca gene was identified to be the first nucleotide of its putative translational start codon (ATG). Thus, bca codes for a leaderless transcript which lacks the 5ˊ-untranslated region. Leaderless mRNAs starting with an AUG start codon have been reported in bacteria, archaea, eukaryotes [87] and also in C. glutamicum [71]. In fact, a recent RNA sequence analysis (RNAseq) with C. glutamicum revealed that about 33% of all mRNAs including that of the bca gene, in the cells are leaderless and that the translational start codon of these leaderless mRNAs generally is an AUG (about 79%) or GUG (about 21%) [72]. However, for leaderless mRNAs starting with the initiation codon AUG, no signals have been shown downstream of the 5ˊ-terminal AUG for recruitment of ribosomes [87]. In E. coli, it has been shown that for translation initiation of leaderless mRNAs, the molar ratio of the initiation factors IF2 and IF3 plays a final role, indicating that the translation efficiency of these mRNAs can be altered, based on the availability of components of the translational machinery [87, 88]. Homologues of genes encoding IF2 and IF3 have been found in the genome of C. glutamicum (cg1563 and cg2176, respectively; [89]), however, a role of these factors in translation of leaderless transcripts remains to be investigated.

Apart from the bca gene, we also determined the TSS for the gca gene, located at position -20 relative to the first nucleotide of the putative translational start codon of cg0154, a gene located upstream of the gca. Co-transcription of cg0154 and gca has previously been shown based on RNAseq analysis of C. glutamicum by Pfeifer-Sancar et al. [72].

To investigate a carbon source-dependent regulation of the CA genes in C. glutamicum, we investigated the expression of bca and gca in terms of their respective promoter activities in relation to glucose and acetate as carbon sources. This analysis revealed for both genes higher promoter activities when the cells were grown on glucose as compared to acetate. Furthermore, the activity of the bca promoter was observed to be about 15-fold higher than that of the gca promoter. The lower level of gca expression as compared to bca expression is consistent with the results of Mitsuhashi et al. [17] who found in Northern blot analysis of growing C. glutamicum cells the gca transcript level below the detection limit, suggesting that gca expression is either constantly very low or tightly regulated. Furthermore, it was also observed that expression of gca under control of the lac promoter restored the growth of bca mutant under normal environmental conditions [17]. However, our results suggest that the bca gene is subject to carbon source-dependent regulation as is the case for a variety of genes encoding key enzymes in central metabolism in C. glutamicum [53, 73, 90, 91].

The lower bca promoter activity and thus, the lower bca expression in acetate-grown cells than in glucose-grown cells of C. glutamicum might be attributed to a lower HCO₃^- demand and reduced need of anaplerosis by pyruvate or PEP carboxylation and using the glyoxylate cycle for anaplerosis when growing on acetate instead of glucose. This hypothesis is in agreement with carbon flux analysis of the central metabolism of C. glutamicum growing in minimal medium containing glucose and/or acetate [92] and with the previous finding that a PEP and pyruvate carboxylase-deficient double mutant of C. glutamicum grows on acetate but not on glucose [93]. However the crucial role of bca during growth on glucose may not only be confined to replenishment of oxaloacetate or other TCA cycle intermediates as Mitsuhashi et al. [17] observed that addition of oxaloacetate, glutamate and succinate did not restore the growth of C. glutamicum Δbca. It is, however, important to mention that C. glutamicum was found to be unable to take up and to grow on the TCA cycle intermediates fumarate, succinate and L-malate [94]. Therefore, a further potential role of CA in C. glutamicum, aside of replenishment of TCA cycle intermediates, has to be experimentally proven.

The transcriptional regulator RamA originally has been identified as the regulator of acetate metabolism in C. glutamicum [58]. Later it has been shown that RamA is functional as activator or as repressor in carbon metabolism of this organism and is involved in expression control of a variety of genes and operons encoding enzymes or pathways in the central metabolism of C. glutamicum (reviewed in [73, 90, 95]). Based on the observed carbon source-dependent regulation of the bca promoter, we speculated RamA to be involved in expression control of the bca gene. In fact, we found higher bca promoter activity in a RamA-deficient mutant of C. glutamicum when compared to the wild-type strain. This finding is in perfect agreement with our previous results of a genome-wide transcriptional profiling which showed an about 2.5-fold higher bca mRNA level in C. glutamicum ΔramA (supplementary material in [73]). In addition, we found three typical RamA binding motifs in front of the bca TSS and showed binding of His-tagged RamA protein to the bca promoter region. All these results indicate RamA to be a negative transcriptional regulator for expression of bca in C. glutamicum. However, based on the differential expression of bca in glucose-grown and in glucose-plus-acetate-grown cells of the RamA-deficient mutant, it can be suggested that other transcriptional regulator(s) and/or effector(s) are involved directly or indirectly in the carbon source-dependent bca regulation. This argument is also reinforced by the fact that RamA affects and/or is affected by other transcriptional regulators such as GlxR, SugR and RamB [58, 68, 91].

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154382.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and Higher Education Commission (HEC; Pakistan) award for AS is gratefully acknowledged. We thank C. Gabris for providing strain C. glutamicum ΔatlR (pET2-p4) and M. Brocker at the Forschungszentrum Jülich for MALDI-TOF analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AS BJE. Performed the experiments: AS. Analyzed the data: AS BJE. Wrote the paper: AS BJE.

Citation: Shah A, Eikmanns BJ (2016) Transcriptional Regulation of the β-Type Carbonic Anhydrase Gene bca by RamA in Corynebacterium glutamicum. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0154382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154382

References

1. Kaur S, Mishra MN, Tripathi AK. Regulation of expression and biochemical characterization of a β-class carbonic anhydrase from the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009; 299:149–158. pmid:19694814

2. Smith KS, Ferry JG. Prokaryotic carbonic anhydrases. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000; 24:335–366. pmid:10978542

3. Emmett DH, Tashian RE. Functional diversity, conservation, and convergence in the evolution of the α-, β-, and γ-carbonic anhydrase gene families. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996; 5:50–77. pmid:8673298

4. Blombach B, Takors R. CO2 –intrinsic product, essential substrate, and regulatory trigger of microbial and mammalian production processes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015; 3:108. pmid:26284242

5. Supuran CT. Bacterial carbonic anhydrases as drug targets: toward novel antibiotics? Front Pharmacol. 2011; 2:34. pmid:21779249

6. Zimmerman SA, Ferry JG. The β and γ classes of carbonic anhydrase. Curr Pharm Des. 2008; 14:716–721. pmid:18336318

7. Smith KS, Jakubzick C, Whittam TS, Ferry JG. Carbonic anhydrase is an ancient enzyme widespread in prokaryotes. PNAS. 1999; 96:15184–15189. pmid:10611359

8. Kaur S, Mishra MN, Tripathi AK. Gene encoding γ-carbonic anhydrase is cotranscribed with argC and induced in response to stationary phase and high CO2 in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10:184. pmid:20598158

9. Lotlikar SR., Hnatusko S, Dickenson NE, Choudhari SP, Picking WL, Patrauchan MA. Three functional β-carbonic anhydrases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1: role in survival in ambient air. Microbiology. 2013; 159:1748–1759. pmid:23728627

10. Rowlett RS. Structure and catalytic mechanism of the β-carbonic anhydrases. Biochimi Biophys Acta. 2010; 1804:362–373. pmid:19679201

11. Guilloton MB, Lamblin AF, Kozliak EI, Gerami-Nejad M, Tu C, Silverman D, et al. A physiological role for cyanate-induced carbonic anhydrase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1993; 175:1443–1451. pmid:8444806

12. Nishimori I, Onishi S, Takeuchi H, Supuran CT. The α and β classes carbonic anhydrases from Helicobacter pylori as novel drug targets. Curr Pharm Des. 2008; 14:622–630. pmid:18336307

13. Kumar RSS, Hendrick W, Correll JB, Patterson AD, Melville SB, Ferry JG. Biochemistry and physiology of the β class carbonic anhydrase (Cpb) from Clostridium perfringens strain 13. J Bacteriol. 2013; 195:2262–2269. pmid:23475974

14. Burghout P, Cron LE, Gradstedt H, Quintero B, Simonetti E, Bijlsma JJE, et al. Carbonic anhydrase is essential for Streptococcus pneumoniae growth in environmental ambient air. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192:4054–4062. pmid:20525828

15. Merlin C, Masters M, McAteer S, Coulson A. Why is carbonic anhydrase essential to Escherichia coli? J Bacteriol. 2003; 185:6415–6424. pmid:14563877

16. Gai CS, Lu J, Brigham CJ, Bernardi AC, Sinskey AJ. Insights into bacterial CO2 metabolism revealed by the characterization of four carbonic anhydrases in Ralstonia eutropha H16. AMB Express. 2014; 4:2. pmid:24410804

17. Mitsuhashi S, Ohnishi J, Hayashi M, Ikeda M. A gene homologous to β-type carbonic anhydrase is essential for the growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum under atmospheric conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004; 63:592–601. pmid:12937954

18. Ueda K, Nishida H, Beppu T. Dispensabilities of carbonic anhydrase in Proteobacteria. Int J Evol Biol. 2012; 2012:324549. pmid:22675650

19. Kinoshita S, Udaka S, Shimono M. Studies on the amino acid fermentation. Part I. Production of L-glutamic acid by various microorganisms. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1957; 3:193–205.

20. Liebl W. The genus Corynebacterium—nonmedical. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E (eds) The Prokaryotes, 3rd ed, vol. 3, Springer, New York; 2006. pp. 796–818.

21. Arndt A, Auchter M, Ishige T, Wendisch VF, Eikmanns BJ. Ethanol catabolism in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 15:222–233. pmid:17693703

22. Takors R, Bathe B, Rieping M, Hans S, Kelle R, Huthmacher K. Systems biology for industrial strains and fermentation processes—Example: Amino acids. J Biotechnol. 2007; 129:181–190. pmid:17367886

23. Eggeling L, Bott M. A giant market and a powerful metabolism: L-lysine provided by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 99:3387–3394. pmid:25761623

24. Jensen JVK, Eberhardt D, Wendisch VF. Modular pathway engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for production of the glutamate-derived compounds ornithine, proline, putrescine, citrulline, and arginine. J Biotechnol. 2015; 214:85–94. pmid:26393954

25. Park SH, Kim HU, Kim TY, Park JS, Kim SS, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for L-arginine production. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4618. pmid:25091334

26. Blombach B, Schreiner ME, Bartek T, Oldiges M, Eikmanns BJ. Corynebacterium glutamicum tailored for high-yield L-valine production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 79:471–479. pmid:18379776

27. Hasegawa S, Suda M, Uematsu K, Natsuma Y, Hiraga K, Jojima T, et al. Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for high-yield L-valine production under oxygen deprivation conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79:1250–1257. pmid:23241971

28. Oldiges M, Eikmanns BJ, Blombach B. Application of metabolic engineering for the biotechnological production of L-valine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98:5859–5870. pmid:24816722

29. Cheng Y, Zhou Y, Yang L, Zhang C, Xu Q, Xie X, et al. Modification of histidine biosynthesis pathway genes and the impact on production of L-histidine in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Lett. 2013; 35:735–741. pmid:23355034

30. Kulis-Horn RK, Persicke M, Kalinowski J. Histidine biosynthesis, its regulation and biotechnological application in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol. 2014; 7:5–25. pmid:23617600

31. Eikmanns BJ, Bott M. Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of organic acids and alcohols. In: Corynebacterium glutamicum–From Systems Biology to Biotechnological Applications, A. Burkowski (Ed.), Horizon Scientific Press and Caister Academic Press, Norwich, UK; 2015. pp. 111–137; ISBN: 978-1910190-05-0

32. Wieschalka S, Blombach B, Bott M, Eikmanns BJ. Bio-based production of organic acids with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol. 2013; 6:87–102. pmid:23199277

33. Litsanov B, Kabus A, Brocker M, Bott M. Efficient aerobic succinate production from glucose in minimal medium with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol. 2012; 5:116–128. pmid:22018023

34. Okino S, Noburyu R, Suda M, Jojima T, Inui M, Yukawa H. An efficient succinic acid production process in a metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 81:459–464. pmid:18777022

35. Hüser AT, Chassagnole C, Lindley ND, Merkamm M, Guyonvarch A, Elišáková V, et al. Rational design of a Corynebacterium glutamicum pantothenate production strain and its characterization by metabolic flux analysis and genome-wide transcriptional profiling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71:3255–3268. pmid:15933028

36. Mimitsuka T, Sawai H, Hatsu M, Yamada K. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for cadaverine fermentation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007; 71:2130–2135. pmid:17895539

37. Schneider J, Wendisch VF. Putrescine production by engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 88:859–868. pmid:20661733

38. Schneider J, Wendisch VF. Biotechnological production of polyamines by bacteria: recent achievements and future perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 91:17–30. pmid:21552989

39. Kind S, Wittmann C. Bio-based production of the platform chemical 1,5 diaminopentane. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 5:1287–1296.

40. Nguyen AQD, Schneider J, Reddy GK, Wendisch VF. Fermentative production of the diamine putrescine: System metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metabolites. 2015; 5:211–231. pmid:25919117

41. Inui M, Kawaguchi H, Murakami S, Vertès AA, Yukawa H. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for fuel ethanol production under oxygen-deprivation conditions. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004; 8:243–254. pmid:16179801

42. Blombach B, Riester T, Wieschalka S, Ziert C, Youn JW, Wendisch VF, et al. Corynebacterium glutamicum tailored for efficient isobutanol production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77:3300–3310. pmid:21441331

43. Yamamoto S, Suda M, Niimi S, Inui M, Yukawa H. Strain optimization for efficient isobutanol production using Corynebacterium glutamicum under oxygen deprivation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013; 110:2938–2948. pmid:23737329

44. Siebert D, Wendisch VF. Metabolic pathway engineering for production of 1,2 propanediol and 1-propanol by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015; 8:91. pmid:26110019

45. Jojima T, Noburyu R, Sasaki M, Tajima T, Suda M, Yukawa H, et al. Metabolic engineering for improved production of ethanol by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 99:1165–1172. pmid:25421564

46. Krause FS, Blombach B, Eikmanns BJ. Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for 2-Ketoisovalerate Production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76:8053–8061. pmid:20935122

47. Buchholz J, Schwentner A, Brunnenkan B, Gabris C, Grimm S, Gerstmeir R, et al. Platform engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum with reduced pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity for improved production of L-Lysine, L-Valine, and 2 Ketoisovalerate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79:5566–5575. pmid:23835179

48. Bückle-Vallant V, Krause FS, Messerschmidt S, Eikmanns BJ. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for 2-ketoisocaproate production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98:297–311. pmid:24169948

49. Vogt M, Haas S, Polen T, Ooyen JV, Bott M. Production of 2-ketoisocaproate with Corynebacterium glutamicum strains devoid of plasmids and heterologous genes. Microb Biotechnol. 2015; 8:351–360. pmid:25488800

50. Heider SAE, Peters-Wendisch P, Wendisch VF. Carotenoid biosynthesis and overproduction in Corynebacterium glutamicum. BMC Microbiol. 2012; 12:98. pmid:22963379

51. Jo SJ, Maeda M, Ooi T, Taguchi S. Production system for biodegradable polyester polyhydroxybutyrate by Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006; 102:233–236. pmid:17046539

52. Song Y, Matsumoto K, Yamada M, Gohda A, Brigham CJ, Sinskey AJ, et al. Engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum as an endotoxin-free platform strain for lactate-based polyester production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012; 93:1917–1925. pmid:22127753

53. Bott M & Eikmanns B.J. TCA cycle and glyoxylate shunt of Corynebacterium glutamicum. In: Corynebacterium glutamicum: Biology and Biotechnology (Microbiology Monographs), Yukawa H. & Inui M. (eds), Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. pp. 281–314

54. Sauer U, Eikmanns BJ. The PEP–pyruvate–oxaloacetate node as the switch point for carbon flux distribution in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005; 29:765–794. pmid:16102602

55. Rückert C, Milse J, Albersmeier A, Koch DJ, Pühler A, Kalinowski J. The dual transcriptional regulator CysR in Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 controls a subset of genes of the McbR regulon in response to the availability of sulphide acceptor molecules. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9:483. pmid:18854009

56. Hanahan D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983; 166:557–580. pmid:6345791

57. Studier FW, Moffatt BA. Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J Mol Biol. 1986; 189:113–130. pmid:3537305

58. Cramer A, Gerstmeir R, Schaffer S, Bott M, Eikmanns BJ. Identification of RamA, a novel LuxR-type transcriptional regulator of genes involved in acetate metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 2006; 188:2554–2567. pmid:16547043

59. Blombach B, Hans S, Bathe B, Eikmanns BJ. Acetohydroxyacid synthase, a novel target for improvement of L-Lysine production by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75:419–427. pmid:19047397

60. Vasicová P, Abrhámová Z, Nesvera J, Pátek M, Sahm H, Eikmanns B. Integrative and autonomously replicating vectors for analysis of promoters in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnology Techniques. 1998; 12:743–746.

61. Schäfer A, Tauch A, Jäger W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Pühler A. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene. 1994; 145:69–73. pmid:8045426

62. Green MR, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. 4th ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor New York, USA; 2012.

63. Eikmanns BJ, Metzger M, Reinscheid D, Kircher M, Sahm H. Amplification of three threonine biosynthesis genes in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its influence on carbon flux in different strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1991; 34:617–622. pmid:1369320

64. Auchter M, Laslo T, Fleischer C, Schiller L. Arndt A, Gaigalat L, et al. Control of adhA and sucR expression by the SucR regulator in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2011; 152:77–86. pmid:21320555

65. van der Rest ME, Lange C, Molenaar D. A heat shock following electroporation induces highly efficient transformation of Corynebacterium glutamicum with xenogeneic plasmid DNA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999; 52:541–545. pmid:10570802

66. Dower WJ, Miller JF, Ragsdale CW. High efficiency transformation of E.coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 13:6127–6145.

67. Frohman MA, Dush MK. Martin GR. Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. PNAS. 1988; 85:8998–9002. pmid:2461560

68. Gerstmeir R, Cramer A, Dangel P, Schaffer S, Eikmanns BJ. RamB, a novel transcriptional regulator of genes involved in acetate metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 2004; 186:2798–2809. pmid:15090522

69. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227:680–685. pmid:5432063

70. Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, Pease LR. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 1989; 77:51–59. pmid:2744487

71. Patek M, Nesvera J, Guyonvarch A, Reyes O, Leblon G. Promoters of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2003; 104:311–323. pmid:12948648

72. Pfeifer-Sancar K, Mentz A, Rückert C, Kalinowski J. Comprehensive analysis of the Corynebacterium glutamicum transcriptome using an improved RNAseq technique. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:888. pmid:24341750

73. Auchter M, Cramer A, Huser A, Rückert C, Emer D, Schwarz P, et al. RamA and RamB are global transcriptional regulators in Corynebacterium glutamicum and control genes for enzymes of the central metabolism. J Biotechnol. 2011; 154:126–139. pmid:20620178

74. Blombach B, Buchholz J, Busche T, Kalinowski J, Takors R. Impact of different CO2/HCO3− levels on metabolism and regulation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2013; 168:331–340. pmid:24140290

75. Follonier S, Escapa IF, Fonseca PM, Henes B, Panke S, Zinn M, Prieto MA. New insights on the reorganization of gene transcription in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 at elevated pressure. Microb Cell Fact. 2013; 12:30. pmid:23537069

76. Kaldenhoff R, Kai L, Uehlein N. Aquaporins and membrane diffusion of CO2 in living organisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1840:1592–1595. pmid:24141139

77. Kern DM. The hydration of carbon dioxide. J. Chem. Educ. 1960; 37.

78. Tashian RE. The carbonic anhydrases: widening perspectives on their evolution, expression and function. Bioessays. 1989; 10:186–192. pmid:2500929

79. Tripp BC, Smith K. Ferry JG. Carbonic anhydrase: new insights for an ancient enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:48615–48618. pmid:11696553

80. Götz R, Gnann A, Zimmermann FK. Deletion of the carbonic anhydrase-like gene NCE103 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes an oxygen-sensitive growth defect. Yeast. 1999; 15:855–864. pmid:10407265

81. Kusian B, Sültemeyer D, Bowien B. Carbonic anhydrase is essential for growth of Ralstonia eutropha at ambient CO2 concentrations. J Bacteriol. 2002; 184:5018–5026. pmid:12193617

82. Cottier F, Raymond M, Kurzai O, Bolstad M, Leewattanapasuk W, et al. The bZIP transcription factor Rca1p is a central regulator of a novel CO2 sensing pathway in yeast. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8:e1002485. pmid:22253597

83. Eikmanns BJ. Blombach B. Isobutanol. In: Bioprocessing of renewable resources to commodity bioproducts. V.S. Bisaria & A. Kondo (Eds.), John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2014. pp. 327–352, ISBN: 978-1-118-17583-5

84. Vertès AA, Inui M, Yukawa H. Postgenomic approaches to using Corynebacteria as Biocatalysts. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012; 66:521–50. pmid:22803796

85. Wendisch VF. Molecular Biotechnology: From enzymes and metabolically engineered microbes to superior and sustainable products and processes. J Biotechnol. 2015; 201:1 pmid:25683385

86. Heider SA, Wendisch VF. Engineering microbial cell factories: Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum with a focus on non-natural products. Biotechnol J. 2015; 10:1170–1184. pmid:26216246

87. Moll I, Grill S, Gualerzi CO, Bläsi U. Leaderless mRNAs in bacteria: surprises in ribosomal recruitment and translational control. Mol Microbiol. 2002; 43:239–246. pmid:11849551

88. Grill S, Moll I, Hasenöhrl D, Gualerzi CO, Bläsi U. Modulation of ribosomal recruitment to 5ˊ- terminal start codons by translation initiation factors IF2 and IF3. FEBS Lett. 2001; 495:167–171. pmid:11334885

89. Kalinowski J, Bathe B, Bartels D, Bischoff N, Bott M, Burkovski A, et al. The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate-derived amino acids and vitamins. J Biotechnol. 2003; 104:5–25. pmid:12948626

90. Toyoda K, Inui M. Regulons of global transcription factors in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 100:45–60. pmid:26496920

91. Toyoda K, Teramoto H, Gunji W, Inui M, Yukawa H. Involvement of regulatory interactions among global regulators GlxR, SugR, and RamA in expression of ramA in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 2013; 195:1718–1726. pmid:23396909

92. Wendisch VF, de Graaf A, Sahm H, Eikmanns BJ. Quantitative determination of metabolic fluxes during coutilization of two carbon sources: Comparative analyses with Corynebacterium glutamicum during growth on acetate and/or glucose. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182:3088–3096.

93. Peters-Wendisch PG, Kreutzer C, Kalinowski J, Pátek M, Sahm H, Eikmanns BJ. Pyruvate carboxylase from Corynebacterium glutamicum: characterization, expression and inactivation of the pyc gene. Microbiology. 1998; 144:915–927. pmid:9579065

94. Youn JW, Jolkver E, Krämer R, Marin K, Wendisch VF. Identification and characterization of the dicarboxylate uptake system DccT in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 2008; 190: 6458–6466. pmid:18658264

95. Teramoto H, Inui M, Yukawa H. Transcriptional regulators of multiple genes involved in carbon metabolism in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2011; 154:114–125. pmid:21277916