Citation: Blood Cancer Journal (2014) 4, e238; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.60
Web End =10.1038/bcj.2014.60 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 2044-5385/14
http://www.nature.com/bcj
Web End =www.nature.com/bcj
OPEN
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A phase 2 study of MK-0457 in patients with BCR-ABL T315I mutant chronic myelogenous leukemia and philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia
JF Seymour1, DW Kim2, E Rubin3, A Haregewoin3,13, J Clark3,14, P Watson3, T Hughes4, I Dufva5, JL Jimenez6, F-X Mahon7, P Rousselot8, J Cortes9, G Martinelli10, C Papayannidis10, A Nagler11 and FJ Giles12
Aurora kinase overexpression has been observed in patients with hematologic malignancies. MK-0457, a pan-aurora kinase inhibitor that also inhibits the ABL T315I mutant, was evaluated to treat patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with the T315I mutation. Adults with Ph+ chronic phase (CP)-, accelerated phase (AP)- or blast phase (BP)-CML, or ALL and documented BCR-ABL T315I mutation were treated with a 5-day continuous infusion of MK-0457 administered every 14 days at 40 mg/m2/h, 32 mg/m2/h or 24 mg/m2/h. Fifty-two patients (CP, n = 15; AP,n = 14; BP, n = 11; Ph+ ALL, n = 12) were treated. Overall, 8% of patients achieved major cytogenetic response; 6% achieved unconrmed complete or partial response; 39% had no response. Two patients (CP CML) achieved complete hematologic response. No patients with advanced CML or Ph+ ALL achieved major hematologic response. The most common adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (50%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (46%) and febrile neutropenia (35%). MK-0457 demonstrated minimal efcacy and only at higher, intolerable doses; lower doses were tolerated and no unexpected toxicities were observed. These data will assist in the development of future aurora kinase inhibitors and in the selection of appropriate target
patient populations.
Blood Cancer Journal (2014) 4, e238; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.60
Web End =10.1038/bcj.2014.60 ; published online 15 August 2014
INTRODUCTIONSignicant progress has been made in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML); however, patients who progress from chronic phase (CP) CML to advanced disease respond poorly to therapy and have inadequate survival.1 Critical to the pathogenesis of CML and a subset of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) is a chromosomal rearrangement that results in a fusion gene, BCR-ABL, which encodes an unregulated cytoplasm-targeted tyrosine kinase.2 Although rst- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors-such as imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinibhave been used successfully to treat both CP and advanced CML, intolerance or resistance to these compounds presents a major challenge to treatment and the most common cause of treatment failure.3 For instance, median survival of patients with blast phase (BP) CML who are refractory or intolerant to imatinib is 3 to 9 months.4,5 Of
particular concern is the ABL T315I gatekeeper mutation, which renders leukemia cells resistant to all commercially available tyrosine kinase inhibitors other than ponatinib.3,6
Aurora kinases (aurora-A, -B, -C) are serine/threonine protein kinases involved in the regulation of processes crucial for mitosis. Deregulation of aurora kinase activity promotes aberrant mitosis
and chromosome instability. Overexpression of aurora kinases has been linked to tumorigenesis in a number of human cancers, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.7 A high proportion of patients with hematologic malignanciesincluding acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), Ph+ leukemias, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphomaoverexpress aurora-A and -B; in some cases, overexpression has been linked to poorer outcomes.8
MK-0457 is a potent, small-molecule pan-aurora kinase inhibitor (binding afnity [Ki] = ~ 0.618 nM) that disrupts mitotic progression and induces apoptosis. MK-0457 also inhibits the activity of other kinases, including FLT3 (Ki = ~ 30 nM), JAK-2 (Ki = ~ 190 nM)
and both wild type (Ki ~ 30 nM) and T315I-mutated ABL (Ki ~ 42 nM).911 MK-0457 has been investigated for the treatment of both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.4,1113 The ability to
inhibit multiple kinases, including the imatinib-resistant ABL T315I mutant, may be advantageous in the treatment of newly diagnosed and advanced disease.
In a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies, treatment with MK-0457 was generally well tolerated.4 Forty-four percent of CML patients with the BCRABL T315I mutation achieved a response, and responses were
1Haematology Service Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia;
2St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; 3Merck & Co., Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA; 4Haematology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia; 5Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; 6Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; 7Hpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; 8Hopital de Versailles, Universit Versailles Saint Quentin en, Yvelines, France; 9MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 10University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 11Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel and
12Northwestern Medicine Developmental Therapeutics Institute, Chicago, IL, USA. Correspondence: Professor JF Seymour, Haematology Service Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St, Victoria 8006, Australia.
E-mail: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected]
13Current address: Myriad Genetics.
14Current address: Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA Received 5 June 2014; accepted 17 June 2014
MK-0457 for the treatment of leukemia JF Seymour et al
2 reported as durable.4 The current phase 2 study was conducted to further evaluate MK-0457 in patients with CML or Ph+ ALL carrying the T315I mutation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Study design and patient eligibility
This was a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 2 study that evaluated the safety and efcacy of MK-0457 in patients with either CML or Ph+ ALL and conrmed BCR-ABL T315I mutation (ClinicalTrials.gov identier: NCT00405054; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
Web End =http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT00405054; Protocol 008). Bone marrow aspirate and blood for molecular analysis were collected at screening and analyzed locally to detect the BCR-ABL T315I mutation. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy was conducted before every other cycle for the rst 3 months and then every 3 months, at the time of discontinuation and every 3 months during follow-up, and/or as clinically indicated or to conrm a response. Locally available assays were used for detection of the T315I mutation (examples included direct sequencing, uorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probe detection and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography).
Patients 18 years of age or older with Ph+ (or BCR-ABL+) CP CML, BP CML, accelerated phase (AP) CML or ALL were eligible. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status had to be 2 or lower for CP CML patients and 3 or lower for all other patients. There were no restrictions on the number of prior therapies; however, administration of cytotoxic agents was not permitted within 2 weeks prior to study drug treatment, and a period of at least ve half-lives was required for noncytotoxic anti-leukemic agents. Hydroxyurea was permitted through the rst treatment cycle to control peripheral blood leukemic cell counts. Patients must have had adequate liver and renal function (with the exception of Gilberts syndrome affecting total bilirubin) and were excluded if they had uncontrolled symptomatic congestive heart failure, angina or a myocardial infarction in the preceding 3 months; active infections including HIV, HBV and HCV; severe concurrent disease; or an active second malignancy, or if they had undergone an allogeneic bone marrow transplant within 3 months of starting the trial or had active uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease. Patients with known hypersensitivity to components of the study drug or analogs, or who were pregnant or breastfeeding, were also excluded. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and followed Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All documents were reviewed and approved by the individual institution review boards and all patients provided written informed consent prior to trial enrollment.
Treatment plan and assessmentsPatients were treated using a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion of
MK-0457 administered every 14 days, which constituted one cycle of treatment. The maximum tolerated dose was initially identied as 40 mg/m2/h
for the 5-day dosing schedule of MK-0457. The protocol was subsequently amended to include a lower starting dose of MK-0457 (32 mg/m2/h) because of signicant toxicity at 40 mg/m2/h. Additional patients were enrolled at a lower dose of 24 mg/m2/h, with further dose reductions permitted in patients for toxicity. Patients who were candidates for bone marrow transplant were permitted to leave the study for transplantation. Those patients who achieved a hematologic response prior to bone marrow transplantation were followed for disease outcomes. Patients were allowed to receive additional treatment cycles as long as they did not display clinically signicant disease progression and continued to tolerate the study drug. Primary efcacy end points were major cytogenetic response (MCyR) for patients with CP CML and major hematologic response for patients with AP CML, BP CML and Ph+ ALL.14 Key
secondary efcacy end points were complete hematologic response in patients with CP CML and best cytogenetic response in patients with AP CML, BP CML and Ph+ ALL. Hematologic and cytogenetic responses were evaluated throughout the study from peripheral blood, bone marrow and lumbar puncture (for patients who were central nervous system positive). Hemato-logic response was required to be maintained for at least 28 days to be classied as a response. All patients were assessed for safety, which included physical examination, vital signs, chest X-rays, ECOG performance status, laboratory assessments and monitoring of adverse events (AEs). Adverse events were graded according to the United States National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Each of the four populations was considered an independent substudy. A Simon two-stage minimax design was used with a one-sided type 1 error of 0.025 and
type 2 error of 0.10 using early stopping rules to terminate the substudy if the primary end point was unlikely to be met. A more conservative stopping rule was employed for the CP, BP and AP CML populations if none of the rst 22 patients responded to treatment. The rate of response (MCyR for CP CML; major hematologic response for AP CML, BP CML and Ph+ ALL) in each population to declare the substudy positive with 90% power was 30% in BP, 30% in Ph+ ALL, 45% in AP and 35% in CP.
RESULTSPatient characteristics and dispositionBetween December 2006 and May 2008, 52 patients with T315I-positive CML or Ph+ ALL were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drug (Table 1). Recruitment was halted prior to completion of the planned accrual target of 228 patients because of sponsor decision to discontinue the program due to change in priorities. Enrolled patients included 15 with CP CML, 14 with AP CML, 12 with Ph+ ALL and 11 with BP CML. The overall median age was 52 years (range 2278) and the majority of patients (92%) had an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2. Fifty-four percent of patients had received at least four prior therapies and 29% had received one to three prior therapies, although therapies received may have been part of the same regimen. Seventeen percent were previously untreated. Twenty-six patients started treatment at 40 mg/m2/h, 11 at 32 mg/m2/h and 15 at 24 mg/m2/h. Eighteen patients (35%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease, representing half of all patients who discontinued the study. Ten patients (19%) discontinued due to AEs. Other reasons for discontinuation included bone marrow transplant (6%), physician decision (6%) and patient consent withdrawn (6%).
EfcacyCytogenetic response was not measureable for almost half (48%)
of all patients due to lack of a post-baseline assessment. For evaluable patients, 8% of patients (n = 4) achieved a conrmed MCyR, 6% (n = 3) achieved an unconrmed complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) and 39% had no response (Table 2). Two patients with CP CML (13% of CP patients) experienced a MCyR: one with CCyR and one with PCyR (Table 2). Both patients were in the 40-mg/m2/h treatment group; however, both required signicant dose reductions throughout the course of the study. Dose reduction for the patient who achieved a CCyR occurred each cycle until dose stabilization at 16 mg/m2/h at cycle 6. The patient with a PCyR had a dose reduction to 32 mg/m2/h at cycle 2 followed by another dose reduction at cycle 6 to 28 mg/m2/h. Two of 25 patients (8%) with advanced CML achieved a MCyR, one with AP CML achieved a CCyR and one with BP CML achieved a PCyR. Three patients with AP CML or Ph+ ALL (6% of all patients), all in the 40-mg/m2/h
treatment group, achieved an unconrmed CCyR or PCyR. Two of 15 patients (13%) with CP CML achieved a complete hematologic response. Both were in the 40-mg/m2/h treatment group and none of the other patients, including those in lower treatment groups, had conrmed hematologic assessments of response post baseline. None of the 37 patients with AP CML or Ph+ ALL achieved a major hematologic response while in the study. Four patients with AP CML achieved a minor response: three patients in the 40-mg/m2/h treatment group and one in the 32-mg/m2/h treatment group. One patient with Ph+ ALL achieved unconrmed no evidence of leukemia (24 mg/m2/h) and one patient achieved a minor response (40 mg/m2/h). None of the 11 patients with BP CML achieved any major or minor response.
Safety and tolerabilityOverall, 94% of patients had at least one AE; all patients in the 40 mg/m2/h and 32 mg/m2/h treatment groups and 80% of patients in the 24 mg/m2/h group experienced at least one AE
Blood Cancer Journal 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
MK-0457 for the treatment of leukemia JF Seymour et al
3
Table 1. Patient demographics, baseline characteristics and disposition
Baseline characteristics MK-0457 dose level All patients n = 52
24 mg/m2/h
n = 15
32 mg/m2/h
n = 11
40 mg/m2/h
n = 26
Gender, n (%)Male 9 (60) 7 (64) 18 (69) 34 (65) Female 6 (40) 4 (36) 8 (31) 18 (35)
Age, yearsMedian (range) 63.0 (30, 74) 53.0 (36, 69) 49.5 (22, 78) 52.0 (22, 78) Race, n (%)
Asian 0 (0) 2 (18) 12 (46) 14 (27) Black/African-American 3 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (6) White 12 (80) 9 (82) 14 (54) 35 (67)
ECOG performance status, n (%)0 5 (33) 3 (27) 11 (42) 19 (37)
1 4 (27) 5 (46) 10 (39) 19 (37)
2 4 (27) 2 (18) 4 (15) 10 (19)
3 2 (13) 1 (9) 1 (4) 4 (8)
4 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Cancer stage, n (%)Chronic phase CML 3 (20) 3 (27) 9 (35) 15 (29) Accelerated phase CML 7 (47) 1 (9) 6 (23) 14 (27) Blast phase CML 1 (7) 5 (46) 5 (19) 11 (21) Ph+ ALL 4 (26) 2 (18) 6 (23) 12 (23)
Number of prior therapies, n (%)a0 3 (20) 2 (18) 4 (15) 9 (17)
1 1 (7) 1 (9) 2 (8) 4 (8)
2 3 (20) 1 (9) 2 (8) 6 (12)
3 2 (13) 1 (9) 2 (8) 5 (10)
4 or more 6 (40) 6 (55) 16 (62) 28 (54)
Patients who completed the study, n (%) 3 (20) 5 (46) 7 (27) 15 (29) Patients who discontinued the study, n (%) 12 (80) 6 (55) 19 (73) 37 (71) Adverse event 5 (33) 0 (0) 5 (19) 10 (19) Bone marrow transplant 1 (7) 1 (9) 1 (4) 3 (6) Physician's decision 2 (13) 0 (0) 1 (4) 3 (6) Progressive disease 3 (20) 5 (46) 10 (39) 18 (35) Withdrew consent 1 (7) 0 (0) 2 (8) 3 (6)
Abbreviations: CML, chronic myelogenous leukemia; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; Ph+ ALL, Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. aPrior therapies could be part of the same regimen.
(Table 3). Generally, the rate and intensity of AEs were dose dependent (Table 3). The most common AEs were related to blood and lymphatic system disorders (69%) and gastrointestinal disorders (60%). Treatment-emergent AEs included neutropenia (50%), anemia (37%), febrile neutropenia (35%), diarrhea (35%), thrombocytopenia (29%) and nausea (23%; Table 3). Although gastrointestinal disorders were experienced by a high number of patients, most were grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 or 4 AEs were neutropenia (46%), febrile neutropenia (35%), thrombocytopenia (29%) and anemia (21%; Table 3). Twenty-one patients (40%) experienced an infection and/or infestation during the study, with the highest rate of infection occurring in the 40-mg/m2/h treatment group (58%), followed by 27% and 20% of patients for the 32-mg/m2/h and 24-mg/m2/h treatment groups, respectively. Two grade 4 infections were observed: one patient in the 40-mg/m2/h treatment group experienced septic shock and one patient in the 32-mg/m2/h treatment group developed cellulitis. One patient in the 40-mg/m2/h treatment group died of Klebsiella infection.
Serious AEs were reported in 65% of patients. The highest rates of serious AEs were observed in the 40-mg/m2/h and 32-mg/m2/h treatment groups (73% and 64%, respectively), and 20% of
patients experienced serious AEs in the 24-mg/m2/h group. Serious AEs that occurred in at least two patients included neutropenia (27%), febrile neutropenia (21%), pneumonia (6%), thrombocytopenia (6%), stomatitis (6%), peau dorange (4%), electrocardiogram QT prolonged (4%) and pyrexia (4%).
Seven patients (14%) died during the study. Causes of death included progressive CML, cardiac failure, cerebral hemorrhage, neutropenia, acute pulmonary edema, Klebsiella infection and somnolence. Four patients in the 40-mg/m2/h treatment group died, one patient in the 32-mg/m2/h treatment group died and two patients in the 24-mg/m2/h treatment group died. Deaths due to cardiac failure, cerebral hemorrhage and neutropenia were reported by the investigator as drug related. More than 60% of patients starting at the 40-mg/m2/h dose required at least one dose reduction, compared with 7% of patients starting treatment at the 24-mg/m2/h dose. At the time when the study was discontinued, patients had received a median of two treatment cycles (range 114; mean 3.04 cycles). One patient, deemed by the investigator to be deriving clinical benet with MK-0457, was permitted to continue receiving treatment after the study was discontinued and received a total of 25 cycles of treatment.
2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited Blood Cancer Journal
MK-0457 for the treatment of leukemia
JF Seymour et al
4
Table 2. Summary of best cytogenetic and hematologic responses for patients treated with any dose of MK-0457
Best response, n (%) Chronic phase CML n = 15
Accelerated phase CML n = 14
Blast phase CML n = 11
Ph+ ALL n = 12
All patients n = 52
Best cytogenetic responseMajor response 2 (13.3) 1 (7.1) 1 (9.1) 0 (0.0) 4 (7.7) Complete response 1 (6.7)a 1 (7.1)b 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.8) Partial response 1 (6.7)a 0 (0.0) 1 (9.1)c 0 (0.0) 2 (3.8) Unconrmed complete response 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1)a 0 (0.0) 1 (8.3)a 2 (3.8) Unconrmed partial response 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (8.3)a 1 (1.9) No response 6 (40.0) 8 (57.1) 3 (27.3) 3 (25.0) 20 (38.5) No valid cytogenetic measurement 7 (46.7) 4 (28.6) 7 (63.6) 7 (58.3) 25 (48.1)
Best hematologic responseMajor response NA 0 (0.0) 0 (0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0) Complete response 2 (13.3)a 0 (0.0) 0 (0) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.8) Unconrmed NEL NA 0 (0.0) 0 (0) 1 (8.3)b 1 (1.9) Minor response NA 4 (28.6)d 0 (0) 1 (8.3)a 5 (9.6) No response 0 (0.0) 10 (71.4) 11 (100.0) 10 (83.3) 31 (59.6) No valid hematologic measurement 13 (86.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 13 (25.0)
Abbreviations: CML, chronic myelogenous leukemia; NA, not applicable; NEL, no evidence of leukemia; Ph+ ALL, Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. aTreatment started at 40 mg/m2/h. bTreatment started at 24 mg/m2/h. cTreatment started at 32 mg/m2/h. dTreatment started at 40 mg/m2/h for three patients and 32 mg/m2/h for one patient.
Table 3. Adverse events occurring in at least 10% of all patients following treatment with MK-0467
Adverse event, n (%) MK-0457 starting dose level
24 mg/m2/h
n = 15
32 mg/m2/h
n = 11
All patients n = 52
All grades Grades 3-4 All grades Grades 3-4 All grades Grades 3-4 All grades Grades 3-4
Patients with 1 AE 12 (80.0) 11 (100.0) 26 (100.0) 49 (94.2) Neutropenia 2 (13.3) 2 (13.3) 8 (72.7) 8 (72.7) 16 (61.5) 14 (53.8) 26 (50.0) 24 (46.2)
Anemia 4 (26.7) 0 (0) 3 (27.3) 2 (18.2) 12 (46.2) 9 (34.6) 19 (36.5) 11 (21.2) Febrile neutropenia 3 (20.0) 3 (20.0) 7 (63.6) 7 (63.6) 8 (30.8) 8 (30.8) 18 (34.6) 18 (34.6) Diarrhea 2 (13.3) 0 (0) 3 (27.3) 0 (0) 13 (50.0) 2 (7.7) 18 (34.6) 2 (3.8) Thrombocytopenia 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (45.5) 5 (45.5) 10 (38.5) 10 (38.5) 15 (28.8) 15 (28.8) Nausea 1 (6.7) 0 (0) 2 (18.2) 0 (0) 9 (34.6) 3 (11.5) 12 (23.1) 3 (5.8) Increased alanine aminotransferase 2 (13.3) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 1 (9.1) 8 (30.8) 5 (19.2) 11 (21.2) 7 (13.5) Pyrexia 2 (13.3) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 0 (0) 7 (26.9) 2 (7.7) 10 (19.2) 2 (3.8) Headache 2 (13.3) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 0 (0) 6 (23.1) 0 (0) 9 (17.3) 0 (0) Leukopenia 1 (6.7) 1 (6.7) 1 (9.1) 1 (9.1) 6 (23.1) 6 (23.1) 8 (15.4) 8 (15.4) Hyperbilirubinemia 1 (6.7) 0 (0) 2 (18.2) 2 (18.2) 5 (19.2) 2 (7.7) 8 (15.4) 4 (7.7) Arthralgia 1 (6.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (26.9) 1 (3.8) 8 (15.4) 1 (1.9) Pharyngolaryngeal pain 1 (6.7) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 0 (0) 6 (23.1) 0 (0) 8 (15.4) 0 (0) Hypokalemia 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (27.3) 3 (27.3) 4 (15.4) 3 (11.5) 7 (13.5) 6 (11.5) Stomatitis 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (18.2) 2 (18.2) 5 (19.2) 0 (0) 7 (13.5) 2 (3.8) Increased aspartate aminotransferase 2 (13.3) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 0 (0) 4 (15.4) 1 (3.8) 7 (13.5) 1 (1.9) Rash 1 (6.7) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 0 (0) 5 (19.2) 1 (3.8) 7 (13.5) 1 (1.9) Abdominal pain upper 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (26.9) 0 (0) 7 (13.5) 0 (0) Fatigue 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (27.3) 1 (9.1) 3 (11.5) 0 (0) 6 (11.5) 1 (1.9) Myalgia 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (23.1) 0 (0) 6 (11.5) 0 (0) Mucosal inammation 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (18.2) 0 (0) 3 (11.5) 1 (3.8) 5 (9.6) 1 (1.9) Edema peripheral 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (18.2) 1 (9.1) 3 (11.5) 0 (0) 5 (9.6) 1 (1.9) Dyspnea 2 (13.3) 1 (6.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (11.5) 0 (0) 5 (9.6) 1 (1.9) Vomiting 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 0 (0) 4 (15.4) 0 (0) 5 (9.6) 0 (0)
Abbreviation: AE, adverse event.
40 mg/m2/h
n = 26
DISCUSSIONAurora kinases are critical regulators of mitosis and have been implicated in cancer progression.11 Inhibition of aurora kinases has therefore been pursued for the development of anticancer agents.11 MK-0457 is a potent inhibitor of aurora kinases with
cross-reactivity to other kinases such as FLT3 and ABL. Leukemia patients carrying the ABL T315I mutation are often resistant to all available tyrosine kinase inhibitors, presenting the clinical challenge of nding effective treatment options. These patients tend to have a poor prognosis, highlighting the need to develop
Blood Cancer Journal 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
MK-0457 for the treatment of leukemia JF Seymour et al
5
new therapies to overcome this resistance.6 Recent results from phase 1 and 2 trials evaluating the pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor ponatinib and the protein synthesis inhibitor omacetaxine have demonstrated efcacy in these poor-prognosis patients.15,16 The
number of patients who achieved cytogenetic response in a phase 2 trial of ponatinib was high; the subgroup of patients carrying the T315I mutation had higher response rates than those without,17
but cardiovascular and thrombotic AE limit the clinical appeal of this agent.
In this phase 2 study in patients with ABL T315I-mutated leukemia, cytogenetic responses were observed in 14% of patients (8% conrmed, 6% unconrmed) with chronic and advanced-stage CML or Ph+ ALL. A signicant number of patients were not evaluable for cytogenetic (48% of patients) or hematologic (25% of patients) responses; no responses were observed in 39% of patients and 60% of patients, respectively. Bone marrow biopsies were collected every other cycle to assess cytogenetic response and the likelihood of a patient discontinuing (due to toxicity, for example) prior to an assessment was high. The fact that a high percentage of patients were un-evaluable for response, may potentially explain the discrepancy with the positive responses reported in the phase 1/2 dose-escalation study in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies.4 Many of the patients entered the current study heavily pretreated and with advanced disease. In general, MK-0457 was tolerated at lower doses and no unexpected toxicities were observed in this patient population. Higher doses were associated with an increase in the incidence and severity of adverse events.
Preliminary results from a phase 1 study in patients with solid tumors, presented after initiation of the current study, showed that infusion of 10 mg/m2/h MK-0457 over 5 days in a 28-day cycle was the maximum tolerated dose.18 Neutropenia was the most common AE, consistent with previously published reports, and likely due to aurora kinase inhibition on rapidly proliferating non-cancer cells.4,11,13,19 Additional hematologic and gastrointestinal
disorders were also observed and overlap with the AE prole reported in other studies. Although gastrointestinal disorders were common, they were primarily grade 1 and 2. Gut epithelium contain rapidly cycling cells, potentially leading to the gastrointestinal events observed.4,11,13,19 In another phase 1 dose-
escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors, MK-0457 was administered as a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion and was generally well tolerated in this heavily pretreated patient population. The maximum tolerated dose was 64 mg/m2/h. Stable disease was achieved for almost half of the 27 patients.19
A number of aurora kinase inhibitors currently in development for the treatment of hematologic malignancies have also demonstrated inhibitory activity (half maximal inhibitory concentration values ranging from 4 to 81 nmol/l) in patients with the ABL T315I mutation, including ENMD-2076 and AT9283.8 Pre-clinical studies using cancer cells have demonstrated that aurora kinase inhibitors may provide benet as part of combination therapy or in select patient populations. Cancer cells depleted of aurora-A were sensitized to the effect of chemotherapeutic agents, including taxanes, cisplatin, docetaxel and ionizing radiation.2023 Multiple cancer cell lines with defective p53-p21 pathways were more sensitive to the effects of MK-0457 than cells with wild-type p53-p21 pathways.24 Although clinical development of MK-0457 has ceased, results from this and other studies that have evaluated the effects of aurora kinase inhibitors may help to guide selection and development of future anticancer agents, in combination or in select patient populations, and their use as potential chemosensitizers may be explored further.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
ER and PW are employees of and may own stock in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. FJG received a grant
from Merck for this study. TH received grants from Novartis, BMS and ARIAD outside the submitted work. JLJ received a grant from Merck outside the submitted work. JCortes received grants and consulting fees from ARIAD, BMS, Novartis, Pzer and Teva outside the submitted work. JClark is an employee of Incyte Corporation. GM received personal fees from Novartis, Roche, BMS and Pzer outside the submitted work. DWK received a grant from Novartis during this study, honoraria from Novartis, BMS and ILYANG, and a grant from Pzer outside the submitted work. JFS, AN, PR, F-XM, ID, AH and CP have no conict of interest to disclose.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was sponsored by Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Jennifer Granit, PhD, Integrus Scientic, and was funded by Merck & Co., Inc.
DISCLAIMER
The authors were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions and received no nancial support or other compensation related to the development of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1 Cooper S, Giles FJ, Savona MR. Overcoming resistance in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 50: 17851793.
2 Rowley JD. Letter: A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identied by quinacrine uorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature 1973; 243: 290293.
3 Fava C, Rege-Cambrin G, Saglio G. Chronic myeloid leukemia: state of the art in 2012. Curr Oncol Rep 2012; 14: 379386.
4 Giles FJ, Swords RT, Nagler A, Hochhaus A, Ottmann OG, Rizzieri DA et al. MK-0457, an Aurora kinase and BCR-ABL inhibitor, is active in patients with BCR-ABL T315I leukemia. Leukemia 2013; 27: 113117.
5 Hochhaus A. Imatinib mesylate (Glivec, Gleevec) in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Ann Hematol 2004; 83(Suppl 1): S65S66.
6 Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, Parkinson I, Grigg A, Szer J et al. Detection of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutations in the ATP phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) are associated with a poor prognosis. Blood 2003; 102: 276283.
7 Li JJ, Li SA. Mitotic kinases: the key to duplication, segregation, and cytokinesis errors, chromosomal instability, and oncogenesis. Pharmacol Ther 2006; 111: 974984.
8 Farag SS. The potential role of Aurora kinase inhibitors in haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 2011; 155: 561579.
9 Carter TA, Wodicka LM, Shah NP, Velasco AM, Fabian MA, Treiber DK et al. Inhibition of drug-resistant mutants of ABL, KIT, and EGF receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 1101111016.
10 Cheetham GM, Charlton PA, Golec JM, Pollard JR. Structural basis for potent inhibition of the Aurora kinases and a T315I multi-drug resistant mutant form of Abl kinase by VX-680. Cancer Lett 2007; 251: 323329.
11 Pollard JR, Mortimore M. Discovery and development of aurora kinase inhibitors as anticancer agents. J Med Chem 2009; 52: 26292651.
12 Giles FJ, Cortes J, Jones D, Bergstrom D, Kantarjian H, Freedman SJ. MK-0457 a novel kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or acute lymphocytic leukemia with the T315I BCR-ABL mutation. Blood 2007; 109: 500502.
13 Harrington EA, Bebbington D, Moore J, Rasmussen RK, Ajose-Adeogun AO, Nakayama T et al. VX-680, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the Aurora kinases, suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Nat Med 2004; 10: 262267.
14 Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 60416051.
15 Cortes J, Lipton JH, Rea D, Digumarti R, Chuah C, Nanda N et al. Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate after TKI failure in patients with chronic-phase CML with T315I mutation. Blood 2012; 120: 25732580.
16 Cortes JE, Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Bixby D, Mauro MJ, Flinn I et al. Ponatinib in refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 20752088.
17 Cortes JE, Kim DW, Pinilla-Ibarz J, le Coutre P, Paquette R, Chuah C et al. A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 17831796.
2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited Blood Cancer Journal
MK-0457 for the treatment of leukemia JF Seymour et al
6
18 Rubin EH, Shapiro GI, Stein MN, Watson P, Begstrom D, Xiao A et al. A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic (PK) trial of the aurora kinase (AK) inhibitor MK-0457 in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(Suppl): 18s (Abstr 3009).
19 Traynor AM, Hewitt M, Liu G, Flaherty KT, Clark J, Freedman SJ et al. Phase I dose escalation study of MK-0457, a novel Aurora kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2011; 67: 305314.
20 Briassouli P, Chan F, Savage K, Reis-Filho JS, Linardopoulos S. Aurora-A regulation of nuclear factor-kappaB signaling by phosphorylation of IkappaBalpha. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 16891695.
21 Hata T, Furukawa T, Sunamura M, Egawa S, Motoi F, Ohmura N et al. RNA interference targeting aurora kinase a suppresses tumor growth and enhances the taxane chemosensitivity in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 28992905.
22 Sehdev V, Katsha A, Ecsedy J, Zaika A, Belkhiri A, El-Rifai W. The combination of alisertib, an investigational Aurora kinase A inhibitor, and docetaxel promotes cell death and reduces tumor growth in preclinical cell models of upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Cancer 2013; 119: 904914.
23 Tao Y, Zhang P, Frascogna V, Lecluse Y, Auperin A, Bourhis J et al. Enhancement of radiation response by inhibition of Aurora-A kinase using siRNA or a selective Aurora kinase inhibitor PHA680632 in p53-decient cancer cells. Br J Cancer 2007; 97: 16641672.
24 Gizatullin F, Yao Y, Kung V, Harding MW, Loda M, Shapiro GI. The Aurora kinase inhibitor VX-680 induces endoreduplication and apoptosis preferentially in cells with compromised p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint function. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 76687677.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Web End =http:// http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Web End =creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Blood Cancer Journal 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2014
Abstract
Aurora kinase overexpression has been observed in patients with hematologic malignancies. MK-0457, a pan-aurora kinase inhibitor that also inhibits the ABL T315I mutant, was evaluated to treat patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with the T315I mutation. Adults with Ph+ chronic phase (CP)-, accelerated phase (AP)- or blast phase (BP)-CML, or ALL and documented BCR-ABL T315I mutation were treated with a 5-day continuous infusion of MK-0457 administered every 14 days at 40 mg/m 2 /h, 32 mg/m2 /h or 24 mg/m2 /h. Fifty-two patients (CP, n=15; AP, n=14; BP, n=11; Ph+ ALL, n=12) were treated. Overall, 8% of patients achieved major cytogenetic response; 6% achieved unconfirmed complete or partial response; 39% had no response. Two patients (CP CML) achieved complete hematologic response. No patients with advanced CML or Ph+ ALL achieved major hematologic response. The most common adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (50%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (46%) and febrile neutropenia (35%). MK-0457 demonstrated minimal efficacy and only at higher, intolerable doses; lower doses were tolerated and no unexpected toxicities were observed. These data will assist in the development of future aurora kinase inhibitors and in the selection of appropriate target patient populations.Blood Cancer Journal (2014) 4, e238; doi:10.1038/bcj.2014.60; published online 15 August 2014
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




