Citation: Cell Death and Disease (2012) 3, e356; doi:10.1038/cddis.2012.88
& 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 2041-4889/12 http://www.nature.com/CDDIS
Web End =www.nature.com/cddis
H Moniz1,2,3, M Gastou1,2,3, T Leblanc4, C Hurtaud1,2,3, A Crtien1,2,3, Y Lcluse2,3, H Raslova1,2,3, J Larghero5,6, L Croisille7,M Faubladier8,9, O Bluteau1,2,3, L Lordier1,2,3, G Tchernia10, W Vainchenker1,2,3, N Mohandas11, L Da Costa*,1,6,12 and on behalf of the DBA group of Socit dHmatologie et dImmunologie pdiatrique (SHIP)
Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is caused by aberrant ribosomal biogenesis due to ribosomal protein (RP) gene mutations. To develop mechanistic understanding of DBA pathogenesis, we studied CD34 cells from peripheral blood of DBA patients carrying RPL11 and RPS19 ribosomal gene mutations and determined their ability to undergo erythroid differentiation in vitro. RPS19 mutations induced a decrease in proliferation of progenitor cells, but the terminal erythroid differentiation was normal with little or no apoptosis. This phenotype was related to a G0/G1 cell cycle arrest associated with activation of the p53 pathway.
In marked contrast, RPL11 mutations led to a dramatic decrease in progenitor cell proliferation and a delayed erythroid differentiation with a marked increase in apoptosis and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest with activation of p53. Infection of cord blood
CD34 cells with specic short hairpin (sh) RNAs against RPS19 or RPL11 recapitulated the two distinct phenotypes in concordance with ndings from primary cells. In both cases, the phenotype has been reverted by shRNA p53 knockdown. These results show that p53 pathway activation has an important role in pathogenesis of DBA and can be independent of the RPL11 pathway. These ndings shed new insights into the pathogenesis of DBA.
Cell Death and Disease (2012) 3, e356; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2012.88
Web End =10.1038/cddis.2012.88 ; published online 26 July 2012
Subject Category: Immunity
Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) is a rare congenital disorder characterized by a moderate to severe anemia, in conjunction with erythroblastopenia (absence or o5% of erythroid precursors) in an otherwise normocellular bone marrow. In 40% of DBA cases, various malformations, mostly in the cephalic area, thumbs and upper limbs, are observed.1,2 More than 60% of DBA patients respond to steroid treatment. The steroid-resistant DBA patients are treated with regular transfusions in conjunction with iron chelation therapy. The only curative treatment is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.13
Mutations in gene encoding the ribosomal protein S19 gene (RPS19) were the rst to be identied in DBA and 25% of DBA patients carry mutations in this gene.4 Recently, mutations in genes encoding other RPs of both the small and the large subunits have been identied in DBA patients: RPS24 (2%),5 RPS17 (o1%),6 RPL5 (7%),79 RPL11 (5%),79 RPL36
Keywords: DBA; RPS19; RPL11; p53; apoptosis; cell cycle
Abbreviations: DBA, Diamond-Blackfan anemia; RP, ribosomal protein; rRNA, ribosomal RNA; MDM-2, murine double minute 2; HDM-2, human double minute 2; GFP, green uorescent protein; MOI, multiplicity of infection; EPO, erythropoietin; FBS, fetal bovine serum; SCF, stem cell factor; IL-3, interleukin-3; IMDM, Iscoves modied Dulbeccos media; PE, phycoerythrin; APC, allophycocyanin; GPA, glycophorin a; QRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR; HPRT, hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase; GAPDH, glyceraldhyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; TBST, Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20; PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescent
Received 19.4.12; revised 25.5.12; accepted 29.5.12; Edited by G Raschell
Primary hematopoietic cells from DBA patients with mutations in RPL11 and RPS19 genes exhibit distinct erythroid phenotype in vitro
(o1%),8 RPS7 (o1%),8 RPS27a (o1%),8 RPS15 (o1%),8 RPL35a (3%),10 RPS10 (3%)11 and RPS26 (7%).11 More recently, large deletions in RPS19, RPS17, RPS26 and RPL35a genes have been identied in 17% of DBA cases.12 Thus, E75% of the DBA patients exhibit a RP gene mutation or deletion. The remaining 25% may carry a mutation in the non-coding region of a RP gene or in other gene(s) yet to be dened. Mutations identied in RPS19, RPS10, RPS24 and RPS26, as well as reduced expression of several RPs by small interfering RNAs, result in defective ribosomal biogenesis at different stages of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) maturation.11,1316 Defective ribosomal biogenesis appears to be the major cause of DBA.17
Animal models1823 have begun to provide some mechanistic insights into DBA pathogenesis. Large scale chemical mutagenesis screen for dark skin phenotype identied a mutation in rps19 or rsp20 genes (Dsk3/ and Dsk4/ ,
1INSERM UMR U1009, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; 2Universit Paris-Sud, UMR1009, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; 3Institut Gustave Roussy, UMR1009, Villejuif, France; 4AP-HP, Service dOnco-Hmatologie pdiatrique, Hpital Robert Debr, Paris, France; 5AP-HP, Hpital Saint-Louis, Unit de Thrapie cellulaire et CIC de Biothrapie, Paris, France; 6Universit Paris VII-Denis Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cit, Paris, France; 7AP-HP, Laboratoire dHmatologie, Hpital Bictre, Le Kremlin-Bictre, Paris, France; 8CNRS, UMR5099, Laboratoire de Biologie molculaire des eucaryotes, Universit Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France;
9Universit Paul Sabatier, UMR5099, Laboratoire de Biologie molculaire des eucaryotes, Toulouse, France; 10Centre de dpistage de la drpanocytose, Paris, France;
11New York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA and 12AP-HP, Service dHmatologie Biologique, Hpital Robert Debr, Paris, France*Corresponding author: L Da Costa, AP-HP, Hematology Laboratory, Robert Debr Hospital, 48 Boulevard Srurier, Paris, Cedex 75935, France. Tel: 33 1 40 03 41 66;
Fax: 33 1 40 03 47 95. E-mail: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected]
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA
H Moniz et al
2
respectively)21 in association with two clinical features associated with DBA, growth retardation and a modest decrease in red cell count. In this model, p53 expression level was increased and the phenotype was rescued following inhibition of p53. The p53 pathway was also implicated in Zebrash morpholino models of RPS19 and RPL11, which show a delay in erythroid differentiation.18,19,23 Furthermore, Fumagalli et al.24 have shown that depletion of RPS6, RPS23 and RPL7a in hepatocytes leads to the activation of p53 pathway with increased expression of RPL11 suppressing the murine double minute 2 (MDM-2) E3 ligase activity against p53.
To further understand the mechanistic basis of DBA, we explored the ability of primary circulating CD34 cells of DBA patients with either RPS19 or RPL11 mutations to undergo in vitro erythroid differentiation. In parallel, we studied erythroid differentiation of normal human CD34 cells infected with specic short hairpin (sh) RNA against RPS19 and RPL11. We show here that while RPS19 depletion decreases progenitor proliferation without affecting terminal erythroid differentiation, RPL11 depletion affects both progenitor cell proliferation and erythroid differentiation with marked apoptosis. Although the p53 pathway is involved in both situations, its role is more limited in RPS19-decient samples. Thus, we identied two different erythroid differentiation phenotypes due to different ribosomal mutations that could account for erythroblastopenia, the main characteristic of DBA. Strikingly, p53 pathway was activated without increased RPL11 expression level in RPL11-mutated DBA patients or RPL11-depleted cord blood CD34 cells implying that RPL11 is not necessary in p53 activation following RP depletion.
Results
Two different erythroid differentiation phenotypes in DBA depending on the specic RP defect. We compared the ability of CD34 cells isolated from peripheral blood from DBA individuals with RPS19 (n 12) or RPL11 (n 3)
mutations and CD34 cells from healthy controls (n 15)
to undergo terminal erythroid differentiation (Table 1). CD34 cells were cultured either in two phases (7 day methylcellulose and then liquid culture for additional 5 days) or in a single phase (liquid culture over 12 days). At day 7 of the culture in methylcellulose, immunoblot analyses conrmed the decreased expression of RPS19 or RPL11 in DBA patients compared with healthy controls (Figure 1a), with RPL11 expression consistently decreasing to a greater extent than RPS19 expression. In liquid culture, we observed a decrease in cell amplication for all DBA patients irrespective of the mutational status. As illustrated in Figure 1b, this decrease was less pronounced from D0 to D7 for samples with RPS19 mutations than for samples with mutations in RPL11. This trend of decreased proliferation continued into later stages of culture (D7 to D10). Cytological examination of erythroid cell precursors generated did not show any signicant abnormality when RPS19-mutant CD34 cells were cultured (n 12) while immature
and some apoptotic or necrotic cells were observed when RPL11-mutant CD34 cells were cultured (n 3)
Table1ClinicalandbiologicaldataoftheDBApatients
timeofthestudyGenotype
1FSporadicNANANA1.61Hypogammaglobulinemia,shortstatureITRPS19/
2FSporadic35.6NA3.6Shortstature,prognatism,lowhair
implantation
TRPS19/
3MSporadic23.734.9Epicanthus,lowhairimplantationCRPS19/
4FSporadic3.53.740.86Shortstature,surdity,hipdysplasiaTRPS19/
5MSporadicNANANANAHeart,bones,epilepsia,hydrocephalyTRPS19/
6FFamilial25o20NormalNoNARPS19
CRPL11/
14MSporadic33.35NAShortstature,attenarCRPL11/
15MSporadic16.496.15NoTRPL11/
/
7MFamilialNANANANANoNARPS19/
8MSporadic1.54.2595NANoTRPS19/
9FSporadicNANANANANoTRPS19/
10FSporadic24.512.53NoTRPS19/
11FSporadic13.94.56NAGrowthretardationITRPS19/
12FSporadic24.22NADiabetes,lowimplantationofthethumbTRPS19/
13MSporadicBirth9.5154.93Spinabida,dysimmunity,
triphalangealthumb
Treatmentatthe
Congenital
malformations
eADA
count
(giga/l)
Abbreviations:C,corticosteroids;eADA,erythrocyteadenosinedeaminase;F,female;IT,treatmentindependence;M,male;NA,notavailable;T,transfusions.
(nmoles/min/mg)
Absolute
retic
Hbat diagnosis
(g/dl)
Ageat diagnosis
(month)
Modeof
inheritance
DBASex
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA H Moniz et al
3
RPS19+/Mut
160
** **
140
D7
** p<0.01
* p<0.05 ** p<0.01
Mean of extent of amplification
RPL11+/Mut
140
120
D7 D10 D12
Co RPS19+/M
120
Controls RPS19+/Mut
100
Controls RPL11+/Mut
38.431.3
17.36.8
100
Actin
RPS19
80
RPL11
80
Actin
60
*
60
40
40
Controls
RPS19+/Mut
RPL11+/Mut
**
20
20
RP +/Mut actin at D7
1
0.67
0.4
0
0
D0-D7 D7-D10 D10-D12
D0-D7 D7-D10 D10-D12
Figure 1 Erythroid proliferation is decreased to greater extent in DBA patients carrying mutations in RPL11 gene, compared with patients with mutations in RPS19 gene. (a) Representative immunoblots of erythroid precursors with RPS19 and RPL11 antibodies from DBA patients mutated in RPS19 (left panel) and in RPL11 (right panel) during terminal erythroid differentiation compared with controls. The expression levels were normalized with expression levels of actin. (b) Mean erythroid progenitor and precursor cell proliferation from peripheral CD34 cells from controls (n 15), DBA patients carrying mutations in RPS19 (n 12) or in RPL11 (n 3) gene from D0 to D12 during
erythroid differentiation. Statistical test: Students t-test
RPS19 +/Mut RPL11 +/Mut
D7 D7
CO
51%
DBA
51%
CO
CO
CO
58%
DBA
51%
43%
43%
39%
36%
D10
D11
GPA-PE
GPA-PE
CO
CO
94%
DBA
92%
95%
4%
4%
DBA
85%
89%
6%
D12
D13
DBA
DBA
92%
95%
96%
5%
CD36-APC CD36-APC
Figure 2 DBA patients with mutations in RPS19 gene exhibited a normal erythroid differentiation phenotype compared with patients with mutation in RPL11, who exhibited a delay in erythroid differentiation. (a) MayGrnwaldGiemsa staining of the erythroid cells at D10 of terminal erythroid differentiation (orthochromatic erythroblasts) from controls, DBA patients with mutations in RPS19 gene or in RPL11 gene. The erythroblasts from the DBA patients with mutations in RPS19 (n 12) exhibited a normal terminal
erythroid differentiation while the ones from the patients, who carry a mutation in RPL11 (n 3) exhibited a defect of terminal erythroid differentiation with a large number of
necrotic cells. (b) Left panel: percentage of erythroid precursors (50 000 cells) labeled with the GPA/CD36 antibodies at D7, D10 and D12 of the terminal erythroid differentiation in DBA patients, one mutated in RPS19, one mutated in RPL11. Right panel: percentage of GPA/CD36, CD34 at D10 in the DBA patients carrying either a mutation in RPS19 (n 2) or RPL11 (n 3) gene compared with controls (n 8). Cells from patients who carried a mutation in RPS19 exhibited the same number of GPA/
CD36 or CD34 cells as the controls. By contrast, erythroid precursors from patients, who carry a mutation in RPL11 gene, exhibited a decrease in GPA/CD36 cells and a large increase in CD34 cells, suggesting a delay in erythroid differentiation
(Figure 2a). Accordingly, a slight decrease in the percentage of maturing cells (CD36/GPA (glycophorin A)) was observed in cultures of RPL11-mutated cells (n 3) com
pared with RPL19-mutated (n 2) and control (n 8)
cells (Figure 2b), and the percentage of CD34 erythroid cells was higher in RPL11-mutated cell cultures (Figure 2c). In addition, the percentage of apoptotic cells was much higher in RPL11-mutated cell cultures, as assessed by the quantitation of DAPI /Annexin-V cells (Figure 3a), by the
TUNEL assay (data not shown), and by documentation of increased level of cleaved caspase-3 (Figure 3b).
Knockdown of RPS19 and RPL11 reduces the proliferation of erythroid precursors. As we are unable to obtain enough primary CD34 cells from DBA patients to perform all the necessary studies, we used primary normal human CD34 cells and shRNA-encoding lentiviruses to specically inhibit RPL11 and RPS19 mRNA (Supplementary
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA
H Moniz et al
4
45
Controls RPS19+/Mut
RPL11+/Mut
40
RPS19+/Mut D7
RPL11+/Mut D7 D10
Percentage of DAPI - /Annexin
V + cells
35
D10
30
25
15
55 40
25
15
35
20
Actin
10
5
Cleaved Caspase 3
0
D7 D10 D12
Figure 3 Degree of apoptosis in the DBA patients during erythroid differentiation. (a) Percentage of Annexin-V-positive cells during terminal erythroid differentiation in DBA patients, who carried mutation in RPS19 (RPS19/Mut) (n 2) (dark grey plot), in RPL11 (RPL11/Mut) (n 3) (light gray plot) compared with the controls (n 8) (black plot).
The differences were statistically signicant between controls and RPS11/Mut at days 7, 10 and 12 (Po0.001). Only two RPS19/Mut samples were studied for Annexin-V and statistical signicance was not studied. However, nine other samples were studied by the TUNEL assay. If we pool the results from these two techniques investigating apoptosis, a much less statistical difference has been observed between controls and the RPS19/Mut samples (Po0.05) than for RPS11/Mut. (b) Representative western blot of cleaved caspase 3, protein involved in apoptotic pathway during terminal erythroid differentiation in one RPS19-and one RPL11-mutated DBA patients compared with their controls
0.0E+00
4.0E+06
6
**
*
* p<0.05
** p=0.0001
3.5E+06
5
3.0E+06
Number of cells
NI
shSCR
shRPS19
shRPL11
Number of cell division
2.5E+06
4
2.0E+06
3
1.5E+06
2
1.0E+06
5.0E+05
1
D4 D7 D9 D11
0 D4-D7 D7-D9 D9-D11 D11-D14
Controls
Figure 4 Depletion of RPS19 or RPL11 induces a decrease in cell growth. (a) Cell growth curves during erythroid differentiation following infection with shRPS19 and shRPL11 compared with the non-infected cells or infected with the shSCR (three independent experiments). (b) Number of cell divisions calculated at several time points according to the formula: number of cell division log(extent of amplication)/log2. Data from three independent experiments
shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
File 1AC). The efcacy of shRNA was validated in UT-7 cells and in 7-day erythroid cultures of cord blood CD34 cells. One of the three shRNAs targeting RPL11 tested, shRPL11A induced a 95% and a 65% decrease in RPL11 mRNA level in UT-7 and erythroid cells, respectively, whereas a previously described shRPS19C25 induced a 90% and a 5070% decrease in RPL19 mRNA level in UT-7 and erythroid cells, respectively (Supplementary File 1B). At the protein level (Supplementary File 1C), the decrease obtained in RPS19 protein expression (4055%) was consistently lower than that noted for RPL11 expression (decrease of 6090%), which mimicked the situation observed in primary cells from DBA patients (Figure 1a). Proliferation of erythroid cells following depletion of RPS19 and RPL11 was assayed by counting cells in triplicate at various times following initiation of cell culture in four independent experiments. Although no difference in proliferation was noted between non-infected cells and cells infected with the irrelevant shRNA (shSCRamble), shRPS19 induced a decrease in cell proliferation (Figure 4a and Supplementary File 2) an effect that was even more pronounced following infection with shRPL11 (Figure 4a and Supplementary File 2). As shown in Figure 4b and Supplementary File 2, the largest decrease in cell proliferation was noted between D4 and D7.
Depletion of RPL11 specically delays erythroid differentiation with increased apoptosis. Flow cytometry using the differentiation antigens CD34, CD36, CD71 and GPA showed a delay in erythroid differentiation following RPL11 depletion but not following RPS19 depletion. Indeed, the same percentages of CD36/GPA cells (509%) and CD71 (796%) were present after shRPS19 treatment as in controls (429% and 5313% of CD36/GPA, 781% and 854% of CD71 in non-infected and shSCR-infected cells, respectively; Figures 5a and b). In contrast, less CD36/GPA (209%) and CD71 (3115%) cells were found following infection with shRPL11 (Figures 5a and b). This was related to a blockage or delay in erythroid differentiation as more residual CD34-positive cells were detected in RPL11 (2410%)-depleted cell cultures than in control (81% and 41.5%) and RPS19 (73%)-depleted cell cultures (Figure 5b).
Cytological examination showed that RPL11-depletion induced the appearance of apoptotic cells at day 7, which was not seen in controls and RPS19-depleted cells (data not shown). Flow cytometry analyses conrmed that RPL11 depletion induced a striking increase in the percentage of Annexin-V-positive cells at D7 (Figure 5c), and immunoblot experiments detected cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in RPL11-depleted cells,
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA H Moniz et al
5
NI shSCR
shRPS19 shRPL11
42%
41% 47%
7%
46%
77% NI
15% 5%
90%
3% 5%
shSCR
NI shSCR
shRPS19 shRPL11
2.5%
1%
2%
0.5%
SCR shS19 shL11
Pro-caspase 3 (35 KD)
130
100
PARP (116 KD)
Cleaved PARP (89 KD)
Bcl-xL (30 KD)
70
16%
GPA PE
CD71 APC
55
40
25
15
35
49%
12%
86% shRPS19
7% 4%
shRPL11
14%
55% 29%
DAPI
5%
3%
34%
24%
Actin (42 KD)
Cleaved-Caspase 3
(17 KD)
9% 42%
59% 24%
CD36 APC
CD34 PerCp Cy 5.5
ANNEXIN V PE
70
70
70
Percentage of cells (%)
Percentage of cells (%)
60
60
**
50
50
50
40
**
**
Percentage of cells (%)
60
40
40
30
30
30
20
20
20
** p<0.01
10
10
10
0 NI shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
0 NI shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
0 NI shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
CD36+/GPA+
CD34+
ANNEXIN V PE
Figure 5 Delayed erythroid differentiation following depletion of RPL11. (a) Decreased numbers of CD36/GPA cells following infection with shRPL11 compared with shRPS19-infected and various control cells (three independent experiments). (b) Less CD71 cells and more immature CD34 cells following infection with shRPL11 compared with shRPS19-infected and various control cells (three independent experiments). (c) Top and bottom panels: increased apoptosis following depletion of RPL11, with more Annexin-V-positive cells in cells infected with shRPL11 compare with RPS19 depletion (three independent experiments). (d) Expression level of the major proteins involved in apoptosis (caspase 3 and cleaved caspase 3, PARP and cleaved PARP) or anti-apoptotic protein such as Bcl-XL following of infection of cord blood CD34 with specic shRPS19 or shRPL11 compared with the shSCR infection
which was not observed in controls and in RPS19-depleted cells, in which Bcl-XL was increased (Figure 5d). These ndings are consistent with the higher degree of apoptosis observed in primary CD34 cells with reduced expression of RPL11 due to gene mutations.
p53 pathway is activated in primary CD34 cells from DBA patients and following RPS19 or RPL11 depletion in normal CD34 cells. We analyzed the p53 pathway in erythroid cells from six DBA patients three with mutant RPS19 (RPS19/mut) and three with mutant RPL11 (RPL11/Mut). Increased level of p53 was noted in all DBA patients, suggesting stabilization of the protein (Figures 6a and b). Furthermore, the transcript of p21, a primary target of p53, was markedly increased in erythroid cells with mutant RPS19 (32.3-fold, and 7.4-fold at D7 and D10, respectively) and with mutant RPL11 (17-fold and 49.4-fold at D7 and D10, respectively) conrming activation of p53 (Figure 6a). An increase in p53 and phospho-p53 protein expression levels was also observed in the DBA patients and in RPS19-and RPL11-depleted CD34 cells (Figures 6b and d, Supplementary File 3), with RPL11 depletion increasing the protein levels to a higher extent than RPS19 depletion. To further conrm the activation of p53, we tested the transcript levels of three p53 targets (p21, Bax and Noxa). Following depletion of RPL11, signicant increase in transcripts of all three targets was noted with the most notable increase (16.2-fold) seen for p21. The effect of RPS19 depletion was less pronounced with a slight increase in Bax (twofold) and a larger increase in p21 (vefold), with no increase in Noxa mRNA (Figure 6c). Although an increase in p21 protein was observed with both RPS19 and RPL11 shRNAs, the increase in Bax protein expression level was most pronounced
following depletion of RPL11 (Figure 6d). Taken together, these results show that depletion of RPS19 and that of RPL11 lead to differential activation of the p53 pathway in erythroid cells.
As the documented decrease in cell proliferation cannot be totally explained by apoptosis, especially after RPS19 depletion, we studied cell cycle progression of erythroid cells derived from primary CD34 cells of two RPL11/Mut DBA patients and following RPS19 and RPL11 depletion in normal CD34 cells (Figure 7). An increased number of cells in G0/G1 phase was observed in both patients carrying RPL11 mutation, which was more signicant at D13 than at D10 (Figure 7a). A small increase in cells in G0/G1 phase was also noted following infection with the shRPS19 (490.6%) compared with either non-infected cells (430.6%) or cells infected with shSCR (420.4%) (Figure 7b top and bottom panels). Depletion of RPL11 induced a slightly larger increase in the number of cells in G0/G1 phase (590.5%). In parallel, a decrease in percentage of cells in S and in G2/M phases was noted (Figure 7b). Moreover, cells in subG1, which represent apoptotic cells, were present following infection with shRPL11 (80.8%), conrming that increased apoptosis is a feature of RPL11 depletion (Figure 7b).
p53 activation is responsible for apoptosis and the G0/G1 cell cycle arrest. To further dene the role of p53 activation, we performed a dual shRNA infection, rst with either green uorescent protein (GFP)-shRPS19 or GFP-shRPL11 on day 1, then by a Cherry-shp53 infection on day 2. The efciency of the shp53 was conrmed in UT7 and CD34 cells by documenting decreases in p53 mRNA and in protein expression levels (Figure 8a). Following decreased expression of p53, proliferation of both
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA
H Moniz et al
6
p53/GAPDH
p21/GAPDH
4.5
70
4
mRNA expression level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
Controls RPS19+/Mut
RPL11+/Mut
mRNA expression level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
60
3.5
RPL11+/Mut D7 D10
3
50
2.5
40
70
70
p53 55 40 35
2
30
20
55 40
35
p53
Actin
1.5
1
Actin
0.5
10
0
D7 D10 0
D7 D10
p53/GAPDH
1.8
18
p21/GAPDH
**** ****
SCR shRPS19 shRPL11
Actin
SCR shRPS19 shRPL11
mRNA expression level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
mRNA expression level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
1.6
**
*
16
70
70
55
40
25
15
35
1.4
55
40
25
15
35
P-p53
Actin
Bax
14
p53
p21
1.2
12
1
10
0.8
8
0.6
6
0.4
4
0.2
2
0 shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
0 shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
Bax/GAPDH Noxa/GAPDH
5
3
****
mRNA expression level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
mRNA expression level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
4.5
***
***
4
2.5
3.5
2
3
2.5
1.5
2
1.5
1
1
0.5
* p<0.05** p<0.01 *** p=0.001
**** P<0.001
RPS19+/Mut D7 D10
**
0.5
0 shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
0 shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
Figure 6 p53 activation in DBA patients carrying mutations in RPS19 or in RPL11 gene or after CD34 cell infection with shRPS19 or shRPL11. (a) p53 mRNA and p21 mRNA expression level by quantitative RT-PCR (ratio to GAPDH mRNA level) in DBA patients carrying mutation in RPS19 (dark gray plot) or RPL11 (light gray plot) genes compared with the controls (black plot) at day 7 and day 10 during erythroid differentiation. (b) Western blot analyses of p53 in two patients who carried, respectively, a mutation in RPS19 and in RPL11 gene at D7 and D10 compared with controls. (c) mRNA expression level of p53, p21, Bax and Noxa compared with GAPDH mRNA by quantitative-RT-PCR at day 7 of the erythroid differentiation after cord blood CD34 infection with the shRPS19 or shRPL11 compared with shSCramble infection (three independent experiments). (d) Protein expression levels of p53, phosphorylated p53, and p21 and Bax determined by western blot analysis following infection with shRSP19 or shRPL11 compared with the Scramble at day 7 of the erythroid differentiation (representative of three independent experiments)
RPS19- and RPL11-depleted erythroid precursors increased after day 9 (Figure 8b). Strikingly, we were also able to inhibit the activation of apoptosis induced by RPL11 depletion (Figure 8c). p53 mRNA level returned to normal after p53 depletion in RPS19- and RPL11-depleted cells (Figure 8d). Increased expression levels of p21, Bax and Noxa mRNA noted following infection of CD34 cells with either shRPL11 or shRPS19 was signicantly reduced following p53 knockdown (Figure 8d). These results conrm that the erythroid phenotypes due to RPS19 and RPL11 depletion depend on p53 activation. Of particular interest, the nding that there is no increase in RPL11 expression levels following depletion of either RPS19 or RPL11, implies that increased levels of RPL11 is not necessary for p53 activation pathway (Figure 8e).
Discussion
In spite of the signicant progress made in identifying mutations in ribosomal genes RPS19 and RPL11 in E30%
of DBA patients, the mechanistic understanding of how these mutations account for DBA pathogenesis including erythroblastopenia remains to be fully dened. Erythroblastopenia in DBA is the result of an intrinsic defect with blockade in erythroid differentiation that occurs just following the BFU-e/
CFU-e (burst-forming unit erythroid/colony-forming unit erythroid) transition or between erythropoietin (EPO)-independent and EPO-dependent stages.26 To identify the link between depletion of a RP and the erythroblastopenia in DBA-affected individuals, we investigated proliferation and differentiation of primary hematopoietic cells obtained from DBA patients in the French DBA registry. We obtained two distinct phenotypes, decreased proliferation with either no apoptosis or increased apoptosis, in vitro depending on the RP mutated. Primary cells from patients harboring mutations in RPS19 gene or normal cells following depletion of RPS19 by specic shRNA exhibited decreased proliferation of erythroid cells. However, there was neither alteration of the terminal erythroid differentiation as already reported in RPS19-decient TF1 cell lines27 nor signicantly increased apoptosis. In marked contrast, in patients with RPL11 mutation or following RPL11 depletion by specic shRNA, we identied a more pronounced phenotype: a greater extent of decrease in cell proliferation, delayed erythroid differentiation and marked increase in apoptosis. The fact that we recapitulated exactly the same phenotypes in primary cells from patients harboring the RP mutations and in normal cells following RP depletion reects true differential effects of different RPs on erythroid differentiation.
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA H Moniz et al
7
a RPL11+/Mut32%
500
b
43% 42%
48% 58%
600
CO
600
0
NI
shSCR
500
500
400
400
300
300
200
1.2%
51%
15%
200
0.4%
41%
11%
46%
11%
100
0.2%
50 100 150 200 250
100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
50 100 150 200 250
50 100 150 200 250
subG1 G0/G1 S phase G2/M
subG1 G0/G1 S phase G2/M
subG1 G0/G1 S phase G2/M
D10
40%
2,000
0
DBA
500
0
shRPS19
shRPL11
1,500
400
1,000
300
6.5 %
44%
9%
200
1.2%
40%
9%
8.8%
26%
7%
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
50 100 150 200 250
subG1 G0/G1 S phase G2/M
subG1 G0/G1 S phase G2/M
subG1 G0/G1 S phase G2/M
subG1 G0/G1 S phase G2/M subG1 G0/G1
S phase
G2/M
40%
1,250
500
CO
SubG1
G0/G1
Percentage of cells (%)
1,000
10
80
**
8
750
60
*** ****
6
500
40
4
250
0.6%
47%
12%
2
20
*
0
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
NI shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
NI shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
D12
52%
DBA
S
G2/M
Percentage of cells (%)
1,500
0
50
14
12
40
**
10
1,000
30
**
8
6.5%
6
26%
11%
20
4
10
2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
NI shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11 NI shSCR shRPS19 shRPL11
* p<0.05** p=0.01 *** p<0.01 **** p<0.001
Figure 7 Depletion of RPS19 and RPL11 induces cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase. (a) Cell cycle analysis of erythroid cells from a patient carrying mutation in RPL11 during erythroid differentiation. Cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase with an increased percentage of cells in subG1 phase, corresponding to apoptotic cells can be seen. (b) Representative histograms from cell cycle analysis following depletion of RPS19 and RPL11 by specic shRNA. Percentages of cells in various phases of cell cycle: G0/G1, S, G2M. Following infection with the shRPS19, there is an increased number of cells blocked in G0/G1 phase compared with the controls. Depletion in RPL11 induced an even larger increase in cells blocked in G0/G1 phase with an accumulation of cells in subG1 phase, which reects increased numbers of apoptotic cells (three independent experiments)
Earlier studies using model organisms have implicated a role for p53 pathway in DBA pathogenesis. In a Dark skin (Dsk3 / ) mouse model with a RPS19 missense mutation21 and in a morpholino-induced RPS19-deciency in zebra-sh,19,23 elevated expression levels of p53 were found to account for the observed phenotype, which included growth retardation, a delay in erythroid differentiation and congenital abnormalities that mimic some DBA phenotypes in humans. The zebrash morpholino RPL1118 also induced p53 activation and developmental abnormalities. The present study was
performed in primary cells from a large cohort of 15 DBA patients in which we document p53 activation and cell accumulation in G0/G1 in all the DBA patients analyzed and in normal cells depleted from RPS19 or RPL11. The extent of p53 activation was consistently higher in RPL11-depleted cells compared with RPS19-depleted cells. We validated that the observed decrease in cell proliferation and increase in apoptosis are directly related to p53 activation by showing that both these defects could be reversed by RNA interference-mediated p53 knockdown.
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA
H Moniz et al
8
1000000
p53/GAPDH
mRNA expression
level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
1.4
*
**
900000
1
800000
0.8
Controls
shSCR-mChe
shp53-mChe
* p=0.01
** p<0.005
*** p<0.001
1.2
700000
0.6
0.4
***
600000
0.2
0
***
Number of cells
500000
D7 D9
NI
shSCR shp53
400000
D7
D9
D7
D9
D7
D9
70
300000
55
40 35
p53
200000
Actin
100000
0 D5 D7 D9 D12 D14
GFP-shSCR
GFP-shSCR/
shp53 mChe-shRPS19 shRPS19/
shp53 shRPL11A shRPL11A/
shp53
p53/GAPDH
p21/GAPDH
D7
45
Percentage of Annexin+
cells (%)
mRNA expression
level/GAPDH (Q-RT-PCR)
2
***
160
** ***
40
1.8
140
35
1.6
120
GFP
SCR
SCR
shS19
shS19
shL11
shL11
30
1.4
25
1.2
100
mCHe
shp53 shp53 shp53
20
1
80
15
0.8
60
0.6
Actin
10
0.4
****
40
5
0.2
**** ****
20
SCR GFP
0 SCR/shp53
shRPS19 shRPS19/shp53
shRPL11 shRPL11/shp53
shRPS19 shRPS19/shp53
shRPL11 shRPL11/shp53
0
0
*** ***
***
55 40
25
15
35
SCR GFP
SCR/shp53
shRPS19 shRPS19/shp53
shRPL11 shRPL11/shp53
SCR GFP
SCR/shp53
RPL11
mRNA expression level/GAPDH
(Q-RT-PCR)
Bax/GAPDH Noxa/GAPDH
6
3
5
***
2.5
***
*
4
****
2
3
***
1.5
2
1
1
0.5
*
SCR GFP
SCR/shp53
shRPS19 shRPS19/shp53
shRPL11 shRPL11/shp53
SCR GFP
0 SCR/shp53
shRPS19 shRPS19/shp53
shRPL11 shRPL11/shp53
0
Figure 8 p53 inhibition reversed the erythroid proliferation blockade after RPS19 depletion in CD34 cells and both the erythroid proliferation blockade and apoptosis activation after RPL11 depletion. (a) Efciency of the shp53 CD34 cells: Left panel, the mCherryshp53 is able to reduce completely the level of p53 mRNA at day 7 and to 20% at day 9 compared with the p53 mRNA level in non-infected cells (NI) or infected cells with the shSCR-mCherry; right panel: decreased p53 protein expression level at day 7 and 9 after CD34 infection with the shp53-mCherry compared with the shSCR-mCherry and non-infected cells (NI; three independent experiments). (b) The erythroid proliferation blockade in DBA is dependent on p53 activation in RPS19 and RPL11-depleted erythroid precursor cells: Erythroid progenitor and precursor cell amplication curve from day 0 to day 14 from CD34 infected with the shSCR-GFP (full black line), or with the shSCRGFP-shp53mCherry (interrupted black line), or with the shRPS19GFP alone (full red line) or after a coinfection shRPS19GFP and shp53mCherry (interrupted red line) or with the shRPL11GFP alone (full blue line) or after a coinfection shRPL11GFP and shp53mCherry (interrupted blue line). (c) Activation of the apoptosis is also dependent on p53 activation in RPL11 depleted erythroid precursor cells: Percentage of DAPI /Annexine-V cells at day 7 by ow cytometry in CD34 cells infected CD34 infected with the shSCR-GFP, or with the shSCRGFP-shp53mCherry, or with the shRPS19GFP alone or after a coinfection shRPS19GFP and shp53mCherry or with the shRPL11GFP alone or after a coinfection shRPL11GFP and shp53mCherry. Knockdown of p53 decrease to the amount of apoptotic cells after RPL11 depletion by half. (d) The activation of p21, Bax and Noxa is dependent on p53 activation: The mRNA level of p53, p21, Bax and Noxa measured at day 7 during erythroid differentiation by quantitative RT-PCR compared with the GAPDH reporter gene decreased signicantly after coinfection of the depleted RPS19 or RPL11 cells with the shp53m-Cherry (three independent experiments) *Po0.05, **Po0.01, ***Po0.005, ****Po0.0001. (e) RPL11 increased expression level is not necessary for p53 activation in RPS19 and RPL11 depleted cells. Western blot analyses of the protein expression level of RPL11 after CD34 infection with the shRPS19 or the shRPL11 compared with actin protein level. RPL11 protein was not increased in RPS19-depleted cells compared with the controls (shSCR) and as expected decreased after depletion of RPL11 by the shRPL11. Knockdown of p53 in depleted RPS19 or RPL11 erythroid cells increased the protein expression level of RPL11 but to a less extent as the control (shSCRGFP/shp53)
Our ndings with primary human DBA cells validate the ndings from murine and zebrash models that p53 has a key role in the decreased erythroid proliferation in DBA patho-physiology. Kuramitsu et al.28 have previously shown that decreased expression of RPS19 in CD34 cells induces cell cycle arrest with an accumulation of cell in G0 and no apoptosis, ndings consistent with data from the present study. More recently, Badhai et al.29 showed that RPS19 insufciency in primary broblasts of DBA patients causes cell
cycle arrest in G1 phase, which correlated with marked decreases in CDK2, cyclin D and phosphorylated pRB, indicating an impaired progression into S phase. Interestingly, this phenotype was associated with a normal level of p53 in primary broblasts of DBA patients, probably because broblasts are less sensitive to stress induced by mutations in RP genes. Our results are also in agreement with those of Dutt et al.,30 who observed cell cycle arrest and an activation of p53 pathway following depletion of RPS19. The activation
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA H Moniz et al
9
of p53 pathway due to mutations in RPS19 may be mediated by nucleolar stress due to a defect in rRNA maturation such as that identied in the 30UTR of the ITS1 at the A2 cleavage site of the 18S rRNA.13,15,16 It is well established that a rRNA maturation defect generates nucleolar stress or ribosomal stress. After ribosomal stress, levels of RPL5, RPL11,3133 RPL23,34 RPS335 and RPS736 are increased in the nucleoplasm, which in turn sequester MDM-2 (or human double minute 2 (HDM-2) in human) and prevent it from binding to p53, its natural inhibitor. MDM-2 (or HDM-2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, has a role in ubiquitinating p53 and its resultant degradation by the proteasome. In the event of a ribosomal stress, MDM-2 (or HDM-2) fails to bind p53, and as a result, p53 is not ubiquitinylated and thus not degraded by the proteasome.3136 In addition, Fumagalli et al.24 have shown that, without nucleolar stress in hepatocytes, haploinsufciency in RPS6, RPS23 and RPL7a leads to an upregulation of RPL11. Recently, Dutt et al.,30 has shown that RPS14 or RPS19 depletion after CD34 infection with specic shRNAs leads to p53 activation without nucleolar disruption but through HDM-2 binding to RPL11. In DBA patient CD34 cells, it is too speculative at this time to dene how a mutation in a RP gene leads to an activation of p53 and if HDM-2 is involved but our future studies will focus on deciphering these mechanisms. However, we were able to show that p53 is activated in RPL11-mutated DBA patients and in native CD34 cells infected by shRPL11, which in both cases led to a large decrease in RPL11 protein expression level. As such, it appears that p53 can be activated without increased RPL11 expression level. There is preliminary evidence that p53 may be activated by different mechanisms during a ribosomal stress, one through the RPL11-HDM2-p53 pathway and the other through p38 activation. It is thus possible that p53 activation mechanism(s) following RPS19 or RPL11 depletion may not be the same, which may account for the observed differences in the extents of p53 activation.
In summary, our ndings imply that deciencies in RPS19 and RPL11 activate p53 to different extents, leading to differential effects on erythropoiesis. Furthermore, our ndings have enabled us to establish that increased level of RPL11 expression is not necessary to activate p53 in erythroid cells. An unanswered question is whether the entire erythroid phenotype of DBA is related to increased expression levels of p53 or if additional p53-independent mechanisms may also have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease.
Materials and MethodsPopulation. A total of 15 unrelated patients affected with DBA and 15 hematologically normal individuals were studied. The DBA patients are registered in the French DBA registry. DBA was diagnosed according to the established criteria.1 All cases were reviewed in detail at the time of analysis, and Table 1 shows the biological and clinical data of the 15 DBA patients, which have been obtained from the institutions and physicians responsible for the patients management. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinski. Human umbilical cord blood was collected from normal full-term deliveries after maternal informed consent was approved according to institutional guidelines (AP-HP, Paris, France).
Lentiviral vector construction, production and cell infection. shRNA cloning. The RPS19 shRNA used in the present study was previously described by Flygare.25 Three different shRNA sequences against RPL11 were
synthesized (Eurogentec, Angers, France) and cloned into a pBlue Script containing the human H1 promoter (Gnthon, Evry, France). The H1-shRPS19C, H1-shRPL11A, -L11B, -L11C and H1-SCR (scramble control sequence) cassettes were cloned into a lentiviral vector, pRRLsin-PGK-eGFP-WPRE (Gnthon; Supplementary File 1A). The sequence of the various cloned fragments was conrmed by cDNA sequencing. Oligonucleo-hairpins sequences of RPS19 and RPL11 short hairpins (shRNAs) used in the present study are available upon request. The p53 shRNA sequence was described Brummelkamp et al.37 We
modied the pRRLsin-PGK-eGFP-WPRE including a Cherry sequence instead of eGFP to collect by cell sorting the positive cells for both GFP (shRPS19- and shRPL11-infected cells) and cherry (shp53-infected cells). pm-Cherry C1 plasmid (Clonetech, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France) was digested by SgrAI/XmaI then religated. The modied Cherry cassette was amplied by PCR introducing SalI/ BamHI restriction sites and used as replacement of the SalI/BamHI GFP cassette of pRRL-PGK GFP. Blunt vector from a XhoI digest of pRRL-PGK-Cherry and blunt inserts of pH1-shRNAp53 from a XhoI/EcoRI digest of SuperRetro-pH1-shp53-PGK-Puro were ligated using standard ligation protocol.
Lentiviral production. Lentiviral stocks were prepared as previously described38
and stored at 80 1C. Titers of viral particles were determined by quantifying
the number of GFP or mCherry-positive cells following infection of HEK 293 T cell lines.
Cell infection and culturing of UT-7 cells. UT-7 cells were infected at day 1 at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 in Iscoves 4 modied Dulbeccos media (IMDM; Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France), 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 5 ng/ml granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. GFP- or mCherry-positive cells were sorted 2 days later using a FACSVantage Cell Sorter (Becton Dickinson Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France). The effectiveness of shRNA in downregulating specic mRNA and the protein was assessed 2 days following isolation of sorted cells (Supplementary File 1B and C).
Erythroid cell proliferation and differentiation of CD34 cells, apoptosis and cell cycle analysis. CD34 cells from peripheral blood of DBA patients and control subjects or cord blood were isolated by the immunomagnetic technique (Miltenyi Biotec, Paris, France). Puried CD34 cells from DBA patients and controls were cultured in IMDM medium (Invitrogen) containing 1% L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 1% penicillinstreptomycin (Invitrogen), a-monothioglycerol (Sigma-Aldrich, Lyon, France), 1.5% bovine serum albumin (Stemcell Technologies, Shefeld, UK), iron-saturated transferrin (Sigma-Aldrich)
and 2% liposomes, 50 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF), 1 U/ml interleukin-3 (IL-3), 1 U/ml EPO and 10% FBS. At day 7, cultures were switched to the same medium but with 30% FBS (from D7 to D12). For some DBA patients, we performed in vitro erythroid cultures in two phases: a rst phase of 7 days in methylcellulose with EPO (3 U/ml), SCF (50 ng/ml) and IL-3 (30 U/ml) and a second phase in liquid culture.
For lentiviral infection, CD34 cells were cultured for 2 days in the presence of 10% FBS, 100 U/ml IL-3, 10 ng/ml IL-6, 25 ng/ml SCF, 10 ng/ml thrombopoitein and 10 ng/ml Flt3-L (Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3-ligand). A rst infection was then performed at a 50 MOI. In the case of shRNA-RPS19C, a second infection was performed 6 h after the rst infection (Supplementary File 2). Cells were cultured for 2 more days and GFP-positive cells were sorted using the FACSDIVA Cell Sorter. Sorted cells were switched to the same IMDM medium with SCF (50 ng/ml), IL-3 (1 U/ml) and EPO at 1 U/ml till D7 when the FBS concentration was increased to 30% (from D7 to D14).
Viable cells were counted using the trypan blue dye exclusion test as a function of time in culture. Following MayGrnwaldGiemsa staining, extent of terminal erythroid differentiation was evaluated by morphological assessment.
Erythroid differentiation was also evaluated by ow cytometry (FACS Canto, Becton Dickinson Biosciences). Cells were immunophenotyped from D7 to D14 using several antibodies: phycoerythrin (PE)-coupled anti-GPA (Caltag, Burlingame, CA, USA), allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-CD36, PerCP-cy5.5-conjugated anti-CD34, APC-anti-CD71 (Becton Dickinson Biosciences) and PC7-conjugated anti-CD34 (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France). Isotype controls were obtained from Becton Dickinson Biosciences.
For determining apoptosis, cells were stained with PE-conjugated Annexin-V (Becton Dickinson Biosciences) and with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) according to the manufacturers protocol. In addition, in DBA patients, the TUNEL method was performed according to the manufacturers
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA H Moniz et al
10
protocol (kit ApopDETEK, DAKOCytomation, Enzo Diagnostics Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA) on the cells isolated from erythroid colonies and the percentage of apoptotic cells was determined based on microscopic counting of 200 cells. Cell cycle was studied at day 7, 10 and D12 following propidium iodide staining (Sigma-Aldrich) by ow cytometry.
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR.
RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with RNAse-free DNAse (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). The quality of the RNA was veried on an agarose gel and quantied with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ND-1000 UV-Vis; Thermo Scientic, Wilmington, DE, USA).
Reverse transcription-PCR. cDNA was synthesized from extracted RNA with
SuperScript II RNase H-Reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen).
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Primers and internal probes for quantitative reverse-transcriptase (QRT)-PCR were designed using Primer Express Software (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA) and are available upon request. PCR was carried out in the ABI Prism GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System (Perkin-Elmer) using the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (ABI) containing the specic primers (1.5 mM) and specic probe (0.1 mM). The expression level of each gene was normalized using three housekeeping genes
hypoxantine-guanine-phosphoribosyl-transferase (HPRT) gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene and b2 microglobulin (b2 micro-globulin) gene.
Western blot analysis. Each pellet of 50 000 cells from the DBA patients and 125 000 cells from shRNA-infected CD34 cells was lysed in Laemmli buffer (100 mM Tris pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 4% SDS, 0.2% blue Bromophenol, 20 mM dithiothreitol), sonicated (ve times, 15 s) in ice water and boiled for 5 min. Samples were run on a Tris glycine 10% SDS-PAGE resolving gel. Following electrophoresis, proteins were transferred onto a PVDF Hybond-P membrane (GE Healthcare Europe, Orsay, France) and stained with Ponceau S solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Lyon, France) to assess quantity of transferred proteins. Following washing of the membranes with Tris-buffered saline with 1% Tween-20 (TBST 1 ), membranes were soaked in blocking buffer (4% milk, 1% bovine serum
albumin, 0.2% sodium azide in TBST 1 ) for 1 h and then immunolabeled
overnight at 4 1C with the different antibodies. Antibodies used for immunoblots were as follows: p53, phospho p53 (ser15), caspase 3, cleaved caspase 3, Bcl-XL,
PARP antibodies (all rabbit polyclonal antibodies from Cell Signaling, Ozyme, Saint Quentin Yvelines, France); p21 (2947) (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), Bax antibody (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and b-actin antibody (Ac-15; Sigma-Aldrich). The polyclonal chicken RPS19 antibody,39 the monoclonal RPS19 mouse antibody kindly provided by F Loreni40 or the commercial antibodies against RPS19 (monoclonal mouse SC100836, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and mouse monoclonal 57 643, Abcam), the antibody against RPL11 were used at the appropriate dilution. Following several washes with TBST 1 , membranes were incubated with
appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h. After several washes with TBST 1 ,
the membranes were soaked in ECL solution (GE Healthcare) and the expression level of various proteins determined on the Amersham hyperlm ECL (GE Healthcare).
Statistical analysis. Data are presented as the meanstandard error of the mean (S.E.M.) or standard deviation (S.D.). Students t-test was used to compare the data from different populations.
Conict of InterestThe authors declare no conict of interest.
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to Professor Eric Solary (INSERM U1009, Villejuif, France) for scientic discussions. We thank Dr. F Loreni for providing us the monoclonal mouse antibody against RPS19 (Department of Biology, University Tor Vergata, Roma, Italia). We thank Dr. Stefan Constantinescu (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Brussels, Belgium) and Dr. Guido Bommer (Duve Institute and Universit catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium) for providing us the SuperRetro-pH1-shp53-PGK-Puro construction. We thank Drs
E Lainey and O Fenneteau (Hematology Laboratory, Robert Debr Hospital, Paris, France) for their advice on cytology and cytometry; Maud Simansour, Claudia Spangenberg (Hematology Laboratory, Robert Debr Hospital, Paris, France) and Alexis Proust (Hpital Bictre) for the mutation screening analysis of DBA patients; Isabelle Marie for managing the French DBA registry; and Patricia Rinc for the help in the methylcellulose culture (both from Hpital Bictre, Le Kremlin-Bictre, France). We deeply appreciate the cooperation of DBA patients and their families, all the physicians involved in the patient care and management, who provided us the clinical and biological data and some blood samples. We thank the French DBA patients association (AFMBD), the DBA Foundation and Daniella Maria Arturi Foundation for their support. This work was supported by the Institut National de la Sant et de la Recherche Mdicale (INSERM), France; NIH Grants HL079565 and DK32094, USA; lAgence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR RIBODBA and ANR RIBOCrash), France; la Fondation pour la Recherche Mdicale (FRM) France; lAssociation pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC), France; the DBA Foundation and the Daniella Maria Arturi Foundation, USA.
Author ContributionsHlne Moniz performed the vast majority of experiments and analyzed the data. Marc Gastou performed most of the experiments with the shp53. Thierry Leblanc provided us the DBA patient data and samples. Corinne Hurtaud helped in the purication of CD34 cells and performing erythroid cell cultures. Aurore Crtien performed methylcellulose cultures of CD34 cells and analyzed erythroid differentiation from the DBA patients. Marlne Flaubladier produced and provided us the antibody against RPL11. Laure Croisille performed the clonogenicity assays. Yann Lcluse performed the sorting of the GFP-positive cells by ow cytometry. Jrome Larghero provided cord blood samples. Hanna Raslova helped us with the design of the lentiviruses. Olivier Bluteau and Larissa Lordier generated the mCherry-shp53. Gil Tchernia and William Vainchenker provided clinical and scientic insights. Narla Mohandas participated in study design and wrote the article with Lydie Da Costa and Hlne Moniz. Lydie Da Costa designed the studies, analyzed the data and directed the research project.
1. Vlachos A, Ball S, Dahl N, Alter BP, Sheth S, Ramenghi U et al. Diagnosing and treating Diamond Blackfan anaemia: results of an international clinical consensus conference. Br J Haematol 2008; 142: 859876.
2. Willig TN, Niemeyer CM, Leblanc T, Tiemann C, Robert A, Budde J et al. Identication of new prognosis factors from the clinical and epidemiologic analysis of a registry of 229 Diamond-Blackfan anemia patients. DBA group of Societe dHematologie et dImmunologie Pediatrique (SHIP), Gesellshaft fur Padiatrische Onkologie und Hamatologie (GPOH), and the European Society for Pediatric Hematology and Immunology (ESPHI). Pediatr Res 1999; 46: 553561.
3. Narla A, Vlachos A, Nathan DG. Diamond blackfan anemia treatment: past, present, and future. Sem Hematol 2011; 48: 117123.
4. Draptchinskaia N, Gustavsson P, Andersson B, Pettersson M, Willig TN, Dianzani I et al. The gene encoding ribosomal protein S19 is mutated in Diamond-Blackfan anaemia. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 169175.
5. Gazda HT, Grabowska A, Merida-Long LB, Latawiec E, Schneider HE, Lipton JM et al. Ribosomal protein S24 gene is mutated in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Am J Hum Genet 2006; 79: 11101118.
6. Cmejla R, Cmejlova J, Handrkova H, Petrak J, Pospisilova D. Ribosomal protein S17 gene (RPS17) is mutated in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Hum Mutat 2007; 28: 11781182.7. Cmejla R, Cmejlova J, Handrkova H, Petrak J, Petrtylova K, Mihal V et al. Identication of mutations in the ribosomal protein L5 (RPL5) and ribosomal protein L11 (RPL11) genes in Czech patients with Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Hum Mutat 2009; 30: 321327.
8. Gazda HT, Sheen MR, Vlachos A, Choesmel V, ODonohue MF, Schneider H et al. Ribosomal protein L5 and L11 mutations are associated with cleft palate and abnormal thumbs in Diamond-Blackfan anemia patients. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 83: 769780.
9. Quarello P, Garelli E, Carando A, Brusco A, Calabrese R, Dufour C et al. Diamond-Blackfan anemia: genotype-phenotype correlations in Italian patients with RPL5 and RPL11 mutations. Haematologica 2009; 95: 206213.
10. Farrar JE, Nater M, Caywood E, McDevitt MA, Kowalski J, Takemoto CM et al. Abnormalities of the large ribosomal subunit protein, Rpl35a, in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood 2008; 112: 15821592.
11. Doherty L, Sheen MR, Vlachos A, Choesmel V, ODonohue MF, Clinton C et al. Ribosomal protein genes RPS10 and RPS26 are commonly mutated in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 86: 222228.
12. Farrar JE, Vlachos A, Atsidaftos E, Carlson-Donohoe H, Markello TC, Arceci RJ et al. Ribosomal protein gene deletions in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood 2011; 118: 69436951.
13. Choesmel V, Bacqueville D, Rouquette J, Noaillac-Depeyre J, Fribourg S, Cretien A et al. Impaired ribosome biogenesis in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood 2007; 109: 12751283.
Cell Death and Disease
RPL11 and p53 pathway in DBA H Moniz et al
11
14. Choesmel V, Fribourg S, Aguissa-Toure AH, Pinaud N, Legrand P, Gazda HT et al. Mutation of ribosomal protein RPS24 in Diamond-Blackfan anemia results in a ribosome biogenesis disorder. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17: 12531263.
15. Idol RA, Robledo S, Du HY, Crimmins DL, Wilson DB, Ladenson JH et al. Cells depleted for RPS19, a protein associated with Diamond Blackfan Anemia, show defects in 18S ribosomal RNA synthesis and small ribosomal subunit production. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2007; 39: 3543.
16. Leger-Silvestre I, Caffrey JM, Dawaliby R, Alvarez-Arias DA, Gas N, Bertolone SJ et al. Specic Role for yeast homologs of the Diamond Blackfan anemia-associated Rps19 protein in ribosome Synthesis. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 3817738185.
17. Ellis SR, Gleizes PE. Diamond blackfan anemia: ribosomal proteins going rogue. Sem Hematol 2011; 48: 8996.
18. Chakraborty A, Uechi T, Higa S, Torihara H, Kenmochi N. Loss of ribosomal protein L11 affects zebrash embryonic development through a p53-dependent apoptotic response. PloS One 2009; 4: e4152.
19. Danilova N, Sakamoto KM, Lin S. Ribosomal protein S19 deciency in zebrash leads to developmental abnormalities and defective erythropoiesis through activation of p53 protein family. Blood 2008; 112: 52285237.
20. Devlin EE, Dacosta L, Mohandas N, Elliott G, Bodine DM. A transgenic mouse model demonstrates a dominant negative effect of a point mutation in the RPS19 gene associated with Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood 2010; 116: 28262835.
21. McGowan KA, Li JZ, Park CY, Beaudry V, Tabor HK, Sabnis AJ et al. Ribosomal mutations cause p53-mediated dark skin and pleiotropic effects. Nat Genet 2008; 40: 963970.
22. McGowan KA, Mason PJ. Animal models of diamond blackfan anemia. Sem Hematol 2011; 48: 106116.
23. Uechi T, Nakajima Y, Chakraborty A, Torihara H, Higa S, Kenmochi N. Deciency of ribosomal protein S19 during early embryogenesis leads to reduction of erythrocytes in a zebrash model of Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17: 32043211.
24. Fumagalli S, Di Cara A, Neb-Gulati A, Natt F, Schwemberger S, Hall J et al. Absence of nucleolar disruption after impairment of 40S ribosome biogenesis reveals an rpL11-translation-dependent mechanism of p53 induction. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11: 501508.
25. Flygare J, Kiefer T, Miyake K, Utsugisawa T, Hamaguchi I, Da Costa L et al. Deciency of ribosomal protein S19 in CD34 cells generated by siRNA blocks erythroid development and mimics defects seen in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood 2005; 105: 46274634.
26. Ohene-Abuakwa Y OK, Marius C, Ball SE. Two-phase culture in Diamond Blackfan anemia: localization of erythroid defect. Blood 2005; 105: 243252.
27. Miyake K, Utsugisawa T, Flygare J, Kiefer T, Hamaguchi I, Richter J et al. Ribosomal protein S19 deciency leads to reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis but does not affect terminal erythroid differentiation in a cell line model of Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2008; 26: 323329.
28. Kuramitsu M, Hamaguchi I, Takuo M, Masumi A, Momose H, Takizawa K et al. Decient RPS19 protein production induces cell cycle arrest in erythroid progenitor cells. Br J Haematol 2008; 140: 348359.
29. Badhai J, Frojmark AS, J Davey E, Schuster J, Dahl N. Ribosomal protein S19 and S24 insufciency cause distinct cell cycle defects in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009; 1792: 10361042.
30. Dutt S, Narla A, Lin K, Mullally A, Abayasekara N, Megerdichian C et al. Haploinsufciency for ribosomal protein genes causes selective activation of p53 in human erythroid progenitor cells. Blood 2011; 117: 25672576.
31. Dai MS, Lu H. Inhibition of MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation by ribosomal protein L5. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 4447544482.
32. Dai MS, Shi D, Jin Y, Sun XX, Zhang Y, Grossman SR et al. Regulation of the MDM2-p53 pathway by ribosomal protein L11 involves a post-ubiquitination mechanism. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 2430424313.
33. Horn HF, Vousden KH. Cooperation between the ribosomal proteins L5 and L11 in the p53 pathway. Oncogene 2008; 27: 57745784.
34. Dai MS, Zeng SX, Jin Y, Sun XX, David L, Lu H. Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 76547668.
35. Yadavilli S, Mayo LD, Higgins M, Lain S, Hegde V, Deutsch WA. Ribosomal protein S3: A multi-functional protein that interacts with both p53 and MDM2 through its KH domain. DNA Repair 2009; 8: 12151224.
36. Chen D, Zhang Z, Li M, Wang W, Li Y, Rayburn ER et al. Ribosomal protein S7 as a novel modulator of p53-MDM2 interaction: binding to MDM2, stabilization of p53 protein, and activation of p53 function. Oncogene 2007; 26: 50295037.
37. Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, Agami R. A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. Science 2002; 296: 550553.
38. Naldini L, Blomer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH et al. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science 1996; 272: 263267.
39. Da Costa L, Narla G, Willig TN, Peters LL, Parra M, Fixler J et al. Ribosomal protein S19 expression during erythroid differentiation. Blood 2003; 101: 318324.
40. Angelini M, Cannata S, Mercaldo V, Gibello L, Santoro C, Dianzani I et al. Missense mutations associated with Diamond-Blackfan anemia affect the assembly of ribosomal protein S19 into the ribosome. Hum Mol Genet 2007; 16: 17201727.
Cell Death and Disease is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Cell Death and Disease website (http://www.nature.com/cddis
Web End =http://www.nature.com/cddis)
Cell Death and Disease
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2012
Abstract
Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is caused by aberrant ribosomal biogenesis due to ribosomal protein (RP) gene mutations. To develop mechanistic understanding of DBA pathogenesis, we studied CD34+ cells from peripheral blood of DBA patients carrying RPL11 and RPS19 ribosomal gene mutations and determined their ability to undergo erythroid differentiation in vitro. RPS19 mutations induced a decrease in proliferation of progenitor cells, but the terminal erythroid differentiation was normal with little or no apoptosis. This phenotype was related to a G 0 /G1 cell cycle arrest associated with activation of the p53 pathway. In marked contrast, RPL11 mutations led to a dramatic decrease in progenitor cell proliferation and a delayed erythroid differentiation with a marked increase in apoptosis and G0 /G1 cell cycle arrest with activation of p53. Infection of cord blood CD34+ cells with specific short hairpin (sh) RNAs against RPS19 or RPL11 recapitulated the two distinct phenotypes in concordance with findings from primary cells. In both cases, the phenotype has been reverted by shRNA p53 knockdown. These results show that p53 pathway activation has an important role in pathogenesis of DBA and can be independent of the RPL11 pathway. These findings shed new insights into the pathogenesis of DBA.Cell Death and Disease (2012) 3, e356; doi:10.1038/cddis.2012.88; published online 26 July 2012
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer