OPEN
Citation: Oncogenesis (2015) 4, e164; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2015.22
Web End =10.1038/oncsis.2015.22
http://www.nature.com/oncsis
Web End =www.nature.com/oncsis
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Diacylglycerol kinase- regulates mTORC1 and lipogenic metabolism in cancer cells through SREBP-1
P Torres-Ayuso, M Tello-Lafoz, I Mrida and A vila-Flores
Diacylglycerol kinases (DGKs) transform diacylglycerol (DAG) into phosphatidic acid (PA), balancing the levels of these key metabolic and signaling lipids. We previously showed that PA derived from the DGK isoform promotes mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activation. This function might be crucial for the growth and survival of cancer cells, especially for those resistant to the allosteric mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. How this positive function of DGK coordinates with DAG metabolism and signaling is unknown. In this study, we used a rapamycin-resistant colon cancer cell line as a model to address the role of DGK in tumor cells. We found that DGK predominated over other PA sources such as DGK or phospholipase D to activate mTORC1, and that its activity was a component of the rapamycin-induced feedback loops. We show that the DGK DAG-consuming function is central to cell homeostasis, as DAG negatively regulates levels of the lipogenic transcription factor SREBP-1. Our ndings suggest a model in which simultaneous regulation of DAG and PA levels by DGK is integrated with mTOR function to maintain tumor cell homeostasis; we provide new evidence of the crosstalk between mTOR and lipid metabolism that will be advantageous in the
design of drug therapies.
Oncogenesis (2015) 4, e164; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2015.22
Web End =10.1038/oncsis.2015.22 ; published online 24 August 2015
INTRODUCTIONThe serinethreonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a master signal integrator of growth factors and nutrient levels that coordinates organized cell growth. Hyperactivation of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) downstream of oncogenic mutations in cancer provides the metabolic reprogramming that allows autonomous proliferation and lipogenic tumor metabolism.1,2 The mTORC1 controls protein synthesis by phosphorylating S6 kinase (S6K) and 4EBP-1,3 and governs autophagy and glucose metabolism.1 The mTORC1 also controls de novo lipid biosynthesis by promoting transcriptional regulation of lipogenic enzymes through the SREBP (sterol-regulatory element-binding protein) transcription factors.4,5 The mature active forms of SREBP-1 and -2 are produced by proteolytic cleavage of inactive precursors, and promote transcription of genes needed for fatty acid and cholesterol biosynthesis.6 In some systems, mTORC1 regulates SREBP processing by S6K activation,5,7 although additional mTORC1 effectors might also control SREBP processing and activity.810
Because of the central role of mTOR in cancer biology, its inhibitors are targets for the development of anticancer drugs. Many of the genetic alterations responsible for colorectal carcinogenesis act through the mTOR pathway, suggesting that mTOR inhibitors could be effective in preventing colon cancer progression. The therapeutic effectiveness of these inhibitors is nonetheless limited, due mainly to the intricate regulation of mTOR and to negative feedback loops that lead to resistance.11
Development and evaluation of mTOR-based anticancer therapies require better characterization of the elements that contribute to mTOR crosstalk through different pathways.
The regulation of mTORC1 by the lipid phosphatidic acid (PA) has been proposed to mediate resistance to pharmacological
mTOR inhibition. PA activates mTOR by binding to the FKBP12-rapamycin-binding domain (FRB)1214 that facilitates allosteric mTOR activation and displacement of the endogenous inhibitor FKBP38.15 Rapamycin, a potent mTOR inhibitor,16 associates with the immunophilin FBPK12 to form a complex that prevents FRB/PA interaction.12 Although effective against renal cancer, rapamycin derivatives have only modest effects and limited success in clinical trials for other solid tumors. In advanced cancers, rapamycin-mediated inhibition of mTORC1 releases feedback loops that activate the mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) and sustain tumor survival via AKT17,18 and SREBP-1-dependent fatty acid synthesis.19 The activity of PA-generating enzymes, predicted to limit rapamycin inhibition,20 might also temper the rapamycin-triggered feedback loops responsible for resistance in advanced cancers. PA-generating enzyme expression and/or activity could thus provide a basis for cancer therapies.
Diacylglycerol kinase- (DGK) is a DGK family enzyme that, by phosphorylating diacylglycerol (DAG), produces PA.21
DGK-derived PA promotes mTORC1 activation in several cell systems; it promotes mTORC1-mediated phosphorylation of S6K in response to serum in HEK293 cells22 and C2C12 myoblasts,23 and activates mTORC1 in response to mechanical stimulation of muscle cells.23 By controlling TOR function, the Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans DGK homologs rdgA and dgk-5 regulate lifespan and the oxidative stress response.24 DGK-mediated mTORC1 activation might support cancer growth and responses to mTORC1 inhibitors, which coincides with increased DGK expression in colon cancer compared with normal tissue,2528
and with the observation that colon tumors show marked resistance to mTOR inhibition.29
Here we used a rapamycin-resistant colon cancer cell line to examine the DGK contribution to mTORC1 activation and
Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologa/CSIC, Madrid, Spain. Correspondence: Professor I Mrida or Dr A vila-Flores, Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologa/CSIC, Darwin 3 UAM Campus Cantoblanco, Madrid E-28049, Spain.
E-mail: mailto:[email protected] or [email protected]
Web End [email protected] or [email protected] Received 2 March 2015; revised 26 June 2015; accepted 7 July 2015
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
2
DGK limits rapamycin cell sensitivity and rapamycin-induced AKT phosphorylation
Rapamycin competes with PA for binding to mTORC1, and the activity of PA-producing enzymes is thought to condition rapamycin effects. To determine whether reducing DGK levels increases rapamycin sensitivity of SW480 cells, we examined the effect of low rapamycin doses on p70S6K phosphorylation.Phosphorylation of p70S6K was impaired even at the lowest rapamycin doses (0.1 nM) in cells with reduced DGK expression (Figure 2a). Phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6, the p70S6K target, was also notably reduced in DGK-silenced cells at rapamycin concentrations of o5 nM (Figure 2a), as well as at higher rapamycin doses compared with controls (Figure 2b).
In highly transformed tumor cells, rapamycin-mediated mTORC1 inhibition triggers activation of mTORC2, promoting AKT phosphorylation at Ser473.35 Inhibition of p70S6K phosphor-ylation in rapamycin-treated SW480 cells correlated with increased AKT phosphorylation (Figure 2b). DGK depletion enhanced this effect, conrming that limiting DGK-mediated mTORC1 activation enhanced rapamycin responses (Figure 2b).
DGK function maintains cancer cell proliferation in vitro Activation of the mTORC2/AKT axis in response to mTORC1 inhibition contributes to the survival of cancer cells in the presence of rapamycin. To test whether, as a result of DGK silencing, enhanced AKT phosphorylation contributes to rapamycin resistance in SW480 cells, we studied long-term growth and colony formation in control and DGK stably silenced SW480 cells.As predicted, rapamycin reduced colony formation of control cells only at the highest rapamycin doses. DGK silencing did not signicantly reduce colony formation, but sensitized cells to rapamycin (Figures 2c and d).
DGK is needed to sustain SREBP-1 expressionOur data suggested that although DGK expression limits rapamycin-triggered AKT activation, it has additional functions that sustain long-term cancer cell growth. Activation of SREBP-1 cleavage in tumor cells helps to maintain cell-autonomous tumor growth.4 The mTORC1 activation of S6K is thought to regulate SREBP-1 processing, giving rise to the active form that promotes transcription, including its own.5,7 SREBP-1 cleavage and transcriptional regulation of its target FASN (fatty acid synthase) are reported to be rapamycin insensitive and AKT regulated in some tumors,19
suggesting a role for mTORC2 in the control of lipid metabolism.
We rst determined the effect of rapamycin and DGK silencing on SREBP-1 transcriptional activity in SW480 cells. DGK silencing diminished SREBP-1 and FASN transcription, suggesting reduced SREBP-1 function (Figure 3a). Rapamycin treatment had no signicant effect on FASN transcription, although it diminished SREBP-1 transcription, and this concurs with that described for rapamycin-resistant tumors. These data suggest that although DGK silencing increased rapamycin-induced AKT activation, it has a negative effect on SREBP-1-mediated transcription.
Figure 1. DGK activates mTORC1 and promotes G1/S cell cycle progression. (a, b) SW480 cells were transfected with siRNA, scrambled (control) or specic for DGK or DGK. (a) DGK western blot (top) and total DGK activity (bottom). Relative DGK expression and activity are indicated beneath each blot or autoradiograph, as a percentage of control cell expression or activity (100%). Tubulin was used as loading control. (b) The same cells were used to determine DAG levels (control cells = 1.00) (n 3). The t-test was applied to compare the DAG levels of control and DGK-silenced cells. *, signicant (Po0.05). (cf) Cells transfected with siRNA (control or specic for DGK, DGK or PLD1) were serum-starved and cell cycle progression followed after serum re-addition. (c) Cell lysates obtained at times indicated were evaluated by western blot for DGK expression and P70S6K phosphorylation levels. P70S6K phosphorylation was normalized to total p70S6K and control cell value at time 0 (1.0). (d) Normalized P70S6K phosphorylation is shown for each time. (e) Flow cytometry analysis with propidium iodide staining was used to determine the percentage of cells in distinct cell cycle stages. Histograms show times 0 and 9 h of a representative experiment. The percentage of cells in G0G1, S and G2M phases is shown in each case. (f) Percentage of S-phase cells at 0 and 9 h post serum addition in three experiments. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA); *, signicant (Po0.05). In (a) and (c), representative autoradiogram and blots are shown.
rapamycin-elicited responses. We conrm that DGK operates upstream of mTORC1, limiting its sensitivity to rapamycin, and we identify rapamycin-mediated DGK activation as a feedback regulatory circuit by which DGK helps to regulate SREBP-1 levels via DAG restriction. As a result, whereas DGK depletion sensitizes cells to rapamycin-dependent AKT activation, it severely impairs SREBP-1 stabilization, limiting cell proliferation. Our results show additional DGK contributions to the control of mTORC1 functions and provide evidence that DGK is a regulatory node in cancer metabolism.
RESULTSDGK promotes mTORC1 activation and cell cycle progression in
SW480 cellsThe SW480 cell line is derived from a colorectal tumor and has characteristics of highly transformed tumors, including rapamycin resistance.30 DGK expression was silenced by interfering RNA (RNAi) with a previously validated sequence.22,31 We determined
total DGK activity in DGK-silenced cells and compared it with that of reducing DGK, also expressed by this cell line. DGK silencing had a greater effect on total DGK activity than DGK silencing (Figure 1a), in accordance with previous data showing that DGK is the main contributor to total DGK activity in these cells.32 The
main contribution of DGK to total DGK activity in SW480 cells correlated with the changes observed in DAG levels after silencing each individual DGK isoform. Total DAG levels were much higher in DGK than in DGK-silenced SW480 cells (Figure 1b).
DGK promotes mTORC1 activation in response to serum in renal carcinoma cells22 and in C2C12 myoblasts.23 We tested the effect of DGK silencing by determining phosphorylation of the mTOR substrate p70S6K at various times after serum addition to SW480 cells. As controls, we silenced DGK and phospholipase D (PLD), another PA-producing enzyme that regulates phosphorylation of the mTORC1 target p70S6K33 (Supplementary Figure S1). Serum stimulation promoted an early p70S6K phosphorylation peak, indicating mTOR activation (Figure 1c). A later phosphorylation peak was also observed that probably corresponds to mTORC1 activation at the G2/M checkpoint.34 Attenuation of any of these PA-generating enzymes (DGK, DGK or PLD) decreased early p70S6K phosphorylation, but was more pronounced for DGK (Figures 1c and d). DGK silencing also reduced the later p70S6K phosphorylation peak that was increased by DGK or PLD silencing. The mTOR activation at the G2/M transition is proposed to allow translation of specic RNAs during mitosis,34 although the activation mechanisms are not well understood.
The reduced p70S6K phosphorylation after serum addition correlated with delayed cell entry into S phase (Figure 1e) that was signicant only after DGK silencing (Figure 1f). These data suggest that after serum stimulation, mTORC1 senses PLD- and DGK-derived PA. The data also hint at a distinct DGK contribution to cell-autonomous mTORC1 activation at the G2/M phase.
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
3
Reduced SREBP-1 transcription may be the result of impaired proteolytic cleavage of its precursor. We next analyzed whether rapamycin and DGK depletion modied SREBP-1 processing. Treatment of SW480 cell with low rapamycin doses
increased levels of the processed SREBP-1 form, with no change in the unprocessed form (Figure 3b). This is in agreement with that described above for rapamycin-resistant tumors, in which SREBP-1 processing is AKT mediated. In DGK-silenced
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
4
Figure 2. DGK silencing modies rapamycin effects and impairs SW480 cell proliferation. (a, b) Exponentially growing cells transfected with siRNA control or specic for DGK were treated with the indicated rapamycin doses (24 h). Phosphorylation of P70S6K, S6 and AKT were evaluated by western blot in total cell lysates. The expression of the corresponding total protein was determined in separate blots to avoid interference between the distinct antibodies, and tubulin was used as loading control in the same gel to discard changes in protein expression because of rapamycin treatments. Phosphorylation for each protein was normalized to total expression of P70S6K, S6 and AKT, and to control cell values at time 0 (1.0). Representative blots of at least three independent experiments are shown. (c) Colony growth formation assays were performed in cells stably transfected with siRNA control or specic for DGK and cultured in medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or different rapamycin doses. Colony number and size was evaluated by crystal violet staining. (d) Mean s.e.m. of crystal violet absorbance at 620 nm for triplicate samples from one representative experiment (n 3). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). ns, non signicant; **, signicant (Po0.01); ***, signicant (Po0.001).
cells SREBP-1 processing was increased, coinciding with enhanced AKT activation. Our analysis also showed reduced levels of unprocessed SREBP-1 (Figure 3b). These data suggest that although DGK silencing increased rapamycin-induced AKT activation, and thus SREBP-1 processing, it impaired precursor levels.
SREBP-1 is closely linked to the capacity of cancer cells to promote lipogenic metabolism; they synthesize the bulk of their lipids from autonomous fatty acids. Reduction of serum levels in SW480 cell culture medium decreased mTORC1 activation to levels similar to those triggered by rapamycin (Figure 3c). SREBP-1 processing increased greatly in these conditions with no diminution in the levels of the nonprocessed form, in agreement with continuous SREBP-1 transcription. As anticipated, DGK silencing was not accompanied by maintenance of SREBP-1 levels (Figure 3c). Failure to sustain SREBP-1 processing and transcription correlated with a sharp reduction in long-term growth of DGK-silenced cells in low serum conditions (Figure 3d).
DAG metabolism by DGK contributes to sustain SREBP-1 expression
These experiments conrmed the rapamycin insensitivity of SREBP-1 processing in SW480 cells, and suggested that DGK is necessary to maintain SREBP-1 precursor levels. SREBP-1 activity might require DGK-derived PA or be negatively modulated by a DGK-metabolized DAG pool. As we found that DGK silencing increased cellular DAG levels, we explored the DAG contribution to the maintenance of SREBP-1 levels.
We determined the effect of DAG on SREBP-1 expression by adding a permeable DAG analog. Protein kinase D (PKD) is activated by direct DAG binding and by protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent phosphorylation;36 as PKD phosphorylation is very sensitive to DAG levels, we used it as an indicator of DAG-mediated function. When cells were treated with dioctanoyl (C8)-DAG, western blot analysis showed a modest reduction in SREBP-1 levels and no increase in PKD phosphorylation (Figure 4a). We also examined the consequences of increasing endogenous DAG by treating cells with the DGK inhibitor R59949. Pharmacological DGK inhibition promoted PKD phosphorylation
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
5
Figure 3. DGK controls SREBP-1 levels and transcription activity. (a) Cells transfected with siRNA control or specic for DGK and in exponential growth were rapamycin treated (100 nM, 24 h). The mRNA levels of SREBP-1 and FASN genes were measured by reverse transcription and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Expression shown is relative to the untreated control. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). ns, non signicant; **, signicant (Po0.01); ***, signicant (Po0.001). (b) Cells were treated with indicated rapamycin doses (24 h). SREBP-1 levels were evaluated by western blot in total cell lysates. Levels of SREBP-1 and its processed form (P) were normalized to the loading control (tubulin) and control cell values at time 0 (1.0). (c) Cells in exponential growth were treated with rapamycin (100 nM) or cultured in medium with 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS; 24 h). SREBP-1 levels and S6 phosphorylation were determined relative to the loading control (tubulin) and total S6, respectively, and control cell values as above. In (b) and (c), blots are representative of at least three independent experiments. (d) Colony growth formation assays of cells cultured in medium with 1% FBS were performed as in Figure 2c. Crystal violet staining (top) and mean s.e.m. of absorbance at 620 nm is shown (bottom) for triplicate samples from one representative experiment (n 3). Data were analyzed by t-test. ***, signicant (Po0.001).
and reduced SREBP-1 levels to a greater extent than C8-DAG. As the reduced C8-DAG effect could be due to DGK-mediated metabolism of the exogenous DAG, we pretreated SW480 cells with the DGK inhibitor before adding the DAG analog. R59949 treatment potentiated the C8-DAG effect, seen as reduced SREBP-1 levels and increased PKD phosphorylation (Figure 4a). These experiments clearly suggest DAG-mediated control of
SREBP-1 levels and indicate that DGK-mediated DAG metabolism sustains SREBP-1 activity.
The DGK inhibitor R59949 is reported to block Ca2+-sensitive type I DGK, mainly DGK, more efciently than other isoforms.37
SW480 cells express DGK but not type I DGK and .32 We
compared the effects of DGK and DGK silencing on SREBP-1 levels and PKD phosphorylation with those elicited by
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
6
Figure 4. DAG controls SREBP-1 levels. (a) SW480 cells were treated (6 h) with C8-DAG (100 M) or R59949 (30 M; DGKi), and SREBP-1 levels and PKD phosphorylation analyzed by western blot. (b) Western blot analysis of SREBP-1 levels and PKD phosphorylation in cells with silenced
DGK or DGK, untreated or treated with R59949 (30 M). (c) Cells were treated with bisindolylmaleimide (Bim) or G6976 (100 nM, 16 h), and SREBP-1 levels analyzed by western blot. (d) Cells were treated with G6976 (100 nM, 16 h) and mRNA levels of indicated genes were measured by qRT-PCR. Data shown for triplicates of a representative experiment (n 3) relative to untreated controls. Data analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). ns, non signicant; **, signicant (Po0.05); ***, signicant (Po0.001). In (ac), SREBP-1 levels were normalized to the loading control (tubulin) and control cell values at time 0 (1.0). PKD phosphorylation was normalized to total PKD and control cells. In (b), quantication of the two main pPKD bands is shown. In all cases, blots are shown for representative experiments (n 3).
pharmacological inhibition of DGK. The sharp reduction in SREBP-1 levels following DGK depletion was isoform specic, as DGK silencing did not alter SREBP-1 expression (Figure 4b). R59949 addition reduced SREBP-1 expression in control and in DGK-silenced SW480 cells, but not in DGK-silenced cells (Figure 4b). R59949 binding to the catalytic domain of DGK promotes membrane binding of the inactive enzyme favoring dominant negative functions that are not observed when the enzyme is silenced.32 The diminished SREBP-1 expression in response to R59949 treatment in control cells could be the result of DGK inhibition, although the similar effect observed in DGK-silenced cells suggest the presence of additional R59949-sensitive DGK isoforms and/or a higher sensitivity of DGK to the inhibitor upon DGK silencing. As noted above, inhibitor-treated cells showed increased PKD phosphorylation and slower-migrating bands. The effect of silencing these DGK isoforms on PKD differed from their effect on SREBP-1. DGK silencing promoted PKD phosphorylation similar to that observed after inhibitor treatment. PKD phosphorylation also increased
when DGK was silenced that was further potentiated by the inhibitor (Figure 4b). These data correlate with the changes in DAG levels when each DGK isoform was silenced (Figure 1b), and suggest a predominant contribution of DGK to DAG clearance. They also demonstrate the DGK contribution as a negative regulator of specic DAG pools that promote PKD activation.
These experiments suggest that, in SW480 cells, DGK-mediated DAG metabolism limits activation of DAG-regulated kinases (PKC and/or PKD), whereas it sustains SREBP-1 function. To determine whether DGK regulation of SREBP-1 might be mediated through DAG-activated kinases, we analyzed SREBP-1 levels in cells treated with Bim (a pan-PKC inhibitor) or with G6976 (an inhibitor specic for classical PKC and PKD). Both drugs increased SREBP-1 levels, suggesting negative control of SREBP-1-mediated transcription by classical PKC/PKD kinases (Figure 4c). In agreement, we found increased expression of SREBP-1 and its targets in G6976-treated cells (Figure 4d). These data indicate that DGK controls SREBP-1, at least in part, by modulating a DAG-PKC/PKD effector axis.
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
7
DGK is a component of the rapamycin-induced feedback loops DGK helps to maintain SREBP-1 levels in rapamycin-treated
SW480 cells, suggesting that DGK activation is a consequence of rapamycin-triggered mTORC1 inactivation. Rapamycin treatment decreased DAG levels in SW480 cells, and this effect was reversed by pharmacological DGK inhibition (Figure 5a). Measurement of DGK membrane-associated activity conrmed rapamycin-dependent DGK activation. Rapamycin-mediated DGK activation was observed even in the presence of R59949, correlating with the reduced sensitivity of DGK to this inhibitor (Figure 5b).
Our data place DGK both up- and downstream of mTORC1, with DGK-derived PA facilitating mTORC1 activation and rapamycin-mediated mTORC1 inhibition promoting DGK activation. DGK associates with and is activated by PKC in a feedback loop that guarantees precise regulation of PKC activity.31,38 mTORC2 phosphorylates AKT at Ser473 and PKC at its hydrophobic motif, Ser657.39 We reasoned that rapamycin triggering of mTORC2 could activate the PKC/DGK axis. Rapamycin treatment of SW480 cells triggered early activation of mTORC2, determined as phosphorylation of AKT and PKC at their hydrophobic motifs, observed as early as 15 min post rapamycin addition (Figure 5c). AKT remained phosphorylated throughout the experiment, up to 24 h after rapamycin addition. In contrast, PKC phosphorylation was transient and decreased after 2 h (Figure 5c). In western blot, an antibody that detects PKC-phosphorylated proteins showed rapamycin-triggered PKC activation that decreased at longer treatment times. This phosphorylation was blocked by a pan-PKC inhibitor, conrming PKC activation (not shown). Analysis of PKC-dependent PKD phosphorylation conrmed rapid, transient phosphorylation after rapamycin treatment (Figure 5c). At difference from the total PKC phospho substrate prole, PKD phosphorylation decreased below basal levels at longer treatment times. This transitory effect of rapamycin on PKC and PKD phosphorylation differs from the dephosphorylation kinetics of the p70S6K target pS6, and correlates well with DGK activation.
The previous experiments suggest that rapamycin-mediated mTORC2 activation triggers the mutual regulation of PKC and DGK. To better assess DGK regulation downstream of mTORC1 and 2, we compared the effect of rapamycin on DGK activation with that of torin-1 that inhibits both complexes.40 In parental SW480 cells, torin-mediated DGK activation was even higher than that found after rapamycin treatment. In contrast to the effect observed for rapamycin, torin treatment did not trigger DGK activation in DGK-silenced cells (Figure 5d). These experiments strongly suggest that DGK activity is regulated downstream of mTORC2 and the activation of additional DGK isoforms downstream of mTORC1 inhibition in an mTORC2-independent manner.
To further conrm the DGK contribution to the regulation of DAG signals downstream of mTORC1 inhibition, we determined the S6 and PKD phosphorylation state in DGK-silenced, rapamycin-treated SW40 cells. Long-term rapamycin treatment decreased phosphorylation of both the mTORC1 target S6 and the DAG-effector PKD, as shown above (Figure 5c). The rapamycin effect on PKD phosphorylation was partially lost in DGK-silenced cells (Figure 5d). These ndings demonstrate that DGK limits rapamycin activation of DAG signaling and suggest that it is not the only isoform involved.
DGK limits rapamycin resistance of cancer cells in vivoThe in vitro studies demonstrated that DGK helps to sustain
SREBP-1 levels in a model in which, through DAG consumption, its activation downstream of mTORC2 is needed to control lipogenic metabolism and long-term cancer cell growth. These properties suggest DGK as a potential target for anticancer therapies. We
analyzed the DGK contribution to cancer growth in vivo using stably silenced DGK SW480 cells in a xenograft assay model. We injected control or DGK-silenced SW480 cells subcutaneously into immunocompromised mice and monitored tumor growth over a 25-day period. Mice that received injections of DGK-silenced cells developed tumors that grew more slowly than those derived from control cells (Figure 6a). Most of the excised tumors derived from DGK-silenced cells appeared smaller than those from control cells (Figure 6b), although differences in tumor weight at the experiment end point were not statistically signicant (Figure 6c). This implies that DGK silencing had no marked effect on tumor growth in vivo.
To determine whether DGK silencing alleviated rapamycin resistance of tumors in vivo, we inoculated mice with cells stably expressing control shRNAi or DGK shRNAi. When tumors reached 150 mm3, mice from each group were subdivided into two random groups for rapamycin treatment (Figure 6d). Given the rapamycin resistance of SW480 cells and our previous in vitro data, a large rapamycin dose was administered intraperitoneally every 48 h for 8 days. This dose had no toxic effects on the mice, as inferred from mouse weight (Supplementary Figure S2). DGK silencing with rapamycin treatment reduced tumor growth (Figure 6e); this reduction was signicant from the outset of treatment, when individual tumor volume was normalized to that measured before treatment (Figure 6f). Analysis of tumors at end point also suggested rapamycin-induced reduction (Figure 6g). These experiments conrmed our in vitro observations and suggest that DGK depletion sensitizes tumors to rapamycin. DGK inhibition might thus be an alternative mechanism to potentiate therapies that target the mTOR axis. In addition, determination of tumor DGK levels might be a useful biomarker in the selection of cancer therapy and to predict the effectiveness of mTOR inhibitors.
DISCUSSIONDGKs control the levels of two essential lipids and are thus predicted to be key components in cancer cell lipid metabolism. Here we extend previous studies of DGK-mediated regulation of mTOR by characterizing a functional interrelation of these two proteins in rapamycin-resistant colon cancer cells. Our data provide a link between PA sensing by mTOR and the control of the SREBP-1 transcriptional program by DGK-mediated DAG metabolism. We suggest that rapamycin-mediated DGK activation in highly malignant cells is a feedback loop that helps to sustain resistance.
We found that DGK regulates mTORC1 signaling in the early response to serum addition as well as at late stages of the cell cycle. Other PA-generating enzymes such as DGK or PLD contribute similarly to early mTORC1 activation, suggesting that a given PA threshold is needed for full mTORC1 activation in response to receptor triggering. Only DGK deletion affected the second S6K phosphorylation peak, implying a specic mTORC1 requirement for DGK after the receptor-regulated restriction point. The nding of a second S6K phosphorylation peak coincides with reports indicating late mTORC1 activation during the G2/M phase. The mechanisms that operate at this stage differ from those at the G1/S transition, although their nature is unclear. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 and glycogen synthase 3 are thought to act as mitosis-regulated kinases that phosphorylate the mTORC1 component raptor that activates mTORC1.34 mTORC1 activation promotes mRNA translation during mitosis and is thought to be associated to rapamycin resistance.34 Nuclear DAG levels increase before mitosis41 and activate PKC that acts in concert with CDK1 to mediate lamin B1 phosphorylation and disassembly during mitosis.42 How these lipid-mediated events correlate with mitotic mTOR activation and the precise role of DGK remain to be determined.
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
8
Figure 5. DGK participates in the rapamycin-induced feedback loop in SW480 cells. (a) Cells were treated with DMSO, R59949, rapamycin or the two inhibitors for 24 h. Total cell DAG was determined in an in vitro radioenzyme assay. A representative autoradiogram (top) and mean s.e.m. of at least three independent experiments are shown (bottom). Data analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). ns, non signicant; **, signicant (Po0.01); ***, signicant (Po0.001). (b) Cells were treated as in (a), and DGK activity determined in membrane fractions. Relative DGK activity is indicated beneath a representative autoradiogram of three independent experiments. Activity of vehicle-treated cells = 100. (c) Cells in exponential growth were rapamycin treated (100 nM) for indicated times, and S6, PKC, AKT, PKD phosphorylation and PKC activity were tested by western blot in total cell lysates. The expression of the corresponding total protein was determined in separate blots to avoid interference between the distinct antibodies and tubulin was used as loading control in the same gel to discard changes in protein expression because of rapamycin treatments. Phosphorylation for each protein was normalized to total expression of the corresponding protein, and to control cell values at time 0 (1.0). (d) Control and DGK-silenced cells were treated with rapamycin (100 nM) or torin (250 nM) for 24 h and DGK activity determined. Relative DGK activity is indicated beneath a representative autoradiogram of three independent experiments. Activity of vehicle-treated cells = 100. (e) PKD and rpS6 phosphorylation was determined in total lysates of cells stably transfected with siRNA control or specic for DGK and rapamycin treated (100 nM; 24 h). Phosphorylation was determined as in (c), normalized to PKD and S6. Tubulin is shown as loading control. In all cases, blots shown for one representative experiment (n 3).
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
9
Figure 6. DGK silencing enhances the rapamycin effect on cancer cell growth in vivo. (a) Cells (1.5 106) stably transfected with siRNA control or specic for DGK were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into immunocompromised mice and tumor volume recorded every 48 h. Box-and-whiskers plots show evolving tumor volume for each mouse group (n = 6). (b) Tumors removed after killing of the mouse. (c) Tumor weight for each group. Data show one representative experiment of three (n 5 mice/group). (d) Test protocol for effects of DGK targeting in combination with rapamycin. Cells (106) stably transfected with siRNA control or specic for DGK were injected s.c. into immunocompromised mice. When tumors reached ~ 150 mm3, vehicle or rapamycin was administered every 2 days for 8 days. Tumor volume was recorded every 2 days and mice were killed on day 10. Evolving tumor volume for each mouse group (e) and mean x-fold change (f) are shown. After killing, tumors were removed and weighed (g). Data show a representative experiment of two performed (n 6 mice/
group). In (a, c, e, g) box-and-whisker plots where center line = media; top of box = 75th percentile; whiskers = range. In (f), **, signicant (Po0.01), using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Rapamycin competes with PA for mTORC1 binding that correlates with the enhanced sensitivity of DGK-silenced SW480 cells to rapamycin, including activation of mTORC1-controlled negative feedback. These data conrm DGK-derived PA regulation of mTOR,22 and suggest that rapamycin restriction of PA access to mTOR triggers DGK activation. Our experiments in DGK-silenced cells demonstrate activation of additional DGK isoforms by rapamycin. Recent studies demonstrated a central role for DGK in sustaining oncogenic traits in several types of cancer. Rapamycin resistance leads to Src and Phosphatidylinositol 3-
kinase (PI3K) activation,18 two signals that mediate DGK activation. The recent characterization of the DGK contribution to Src activation in SW480 cells suggests that DGK activation helps to sustain the feedback circuits released by mTORC1 inhibition.32
DGK is a substrate of PKC38,43 that is both an effector and a
component of mTORC2 signaling.44,45 Rapamycin short-term kinetics conrmed concomitant phosphorylation of AKT and PKC at their mTORC2-regulated sites. PKC phosphorylation of DGK triggers its activation, thus terminating DAG-regulated signals.38
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
10
The sustained AKT phosphorylation contrasted with the transient PKC phosphorylation and that of its substrates. These results suggest that mTORC2 activation by rapamycin triggers DGK that limits DAG-mediated signals. Analysis of torin-treated cells conrmed DGK activation downstream of mTORC2, indicating activation of DAG metabolism as component of rapamycin-triggered feedback. This mutual DGK and mTOR regulation resembles that of mTOR and PI3K; whereas in normal cells, such axes help to maintain homeostasis, in cancer cells they mediate the cell rewiring that contributes to drug resistance.
The nature of the pathways under the control of mTORC1 feedback loops is understood only incompletely, but these pathways modify cell metabolism and increase survival to sustain cancer cell growth. The mTORC2 is a critical regulator of glycolytic metabolism in cancer, mainly via AKT activation.46 SREBP-1 cleavage by AKT-dependent and -independent mechanisms suggest that mTORC2 is also a key controller of lipid metabolism in tumors such as glioblastoma.19 We demonstrate that DGK silencing regulates SREBP-1 levels while promoting AKT phosphorylation, showing additional controls on SREBP-1. Concomitant addition of DAG and DGK inhibitor also reduced SREBP-1 levels, indicating that DGK-mediated DAG consumption is an AKT-independent mechanism for SREBP-1 regulation downstream of mTOR. R59949 has been reported to block more efciently the type I DGK isoforms, and from these, is the only DGK expressed in SW480 cells. The discrepancy between DGK silencing and the DGK inhibitor effects might be because of the distinct molecular mechanisms that operate in each case, as a reduction in enzyme levels differs from maintaining the enzyme in an inactive conformation. It also probably reects that R59949 has additional targets, including some unidentied R59949-sensitive DGK isoforms, including DGK,
The negative correlation between DAG and SREBP-1 coincides with a report that SREBP-1 activity in liver is negatively regulated by lipin, a PA phosphatase whose nuclear localization is governed by mTORC1-induced phosphorylation.47 Specic loss of lipin phosphatase activity in adipocytes decreases DAG, with increased PA and mTORC1 activation.48 Our ndings support these two studies and suggest a similar DGK contribution to the regulation of the mTOR/SREBP axis via modulation of the PA/DAG equilibrium. The mechanism by which increased DAG levels impair SREBP-1 is not clear. Pharmacological classical PKC and/or PKD-1 inhibitors promoted SREBP-1-mediated transcription, strongly suggesting the involvement of these DAG-regulated kinases in control of SREBP-1. DAG might also have a direct effect by altering membrane lipid composition and/or transport.
The activation of DGK lipid kinases in response to mTORC1 inhibition indicates additional feedback mechanisms that restore cell homeostasis. DGK activation downstream of mTORC2 in rapamycin-resistant tumors helps to maintain the DAG/PA balance necessary for cell survival. DGK reduction potentiates the growth inhibitory effect of rapamycin. In tumors, DGK levels could thus control the magnitude of mTORC1-mediated feedback triggered by rapamycin analogs as well as by second-generation mTOR inhibitors. These inhibitors target the mTOR catalytic site and block the mTORC2 complex, preventing AKT activation. They appear to have a biphasic effect on AKT, particularly at Thr308,49
but might also target PI3K and trigger feedback mechanisms involving tyrosine signaling.11,32 Determination of tumor DGK levels might be a useful marker for therapy assignment and could improve interpretation of therapeutic effectiveness. Our results indicating that cancer cells require DGK to maintain lipogenic functions suggest new strategies to better cope with drug resistance in cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell culture
The SW480 colon cancer cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), cultured in Dulbeccos modied Eagles medium (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) with 10% fetal bovine serum (GBi Genycell Biotech, Granada, Spain) and 2 mM L-Gln (Gibco, Nuaill, France) and maintained at 37 C and 5% CO2. Cell line identity was conrmed throughout culture by STR genotyping (Genomics Facility, IIB/CSIC, Madrid, Spain).
Antibodies and reagentsAntibodies to p-S6K Thr389 (9205), S6K (9202), p-AKT Ser473 (9271), AKT (2920), p-S6 Ser240/4 (2215), S6 (2317), p-PKD Ser744/8 (2054) and p-PKC substrate (2261) were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA), anti-PKC Ser657 from US Biologicals (Swappscott, MA, USA) (P9103-16A), anti-PKC and PKD from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) (sc-208, -935, -935), anti-SREBP-1 from Millipore (Temecula, CA, USA) (04-469), anti-DGK from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) (ab105195), anti-DGK from Abnova (Tapei, Taiwan) (BO1P), anti-tubulin DM1A (T9026) from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA) and anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) from Upstate (Lake Placid, NY, USA). Horseradish peroxidase-coupled polyclonal goat anti-mouse and -rabbit immunoglobulins were from DakoCytomation (Glostrup, Denmark) (P0447, P0448). DGK inhibitor II (R59949; 266788), bisindolylmaleimide and G6976 were from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany), (203291, 36520). Rapamycin was from LC Laboratory (Woburn, MA, USA) (R-5000). Torin was from Tocris (Bristol, UK) (4247). Recombinant DGK from Escherichia coli (D3065), PMSF, leupeptin and aprotinin were from Sigma-Aldrich. Adenosine 5triphosphate [32P] was from Hartman
Analytic (Braunschweig, Germany). All lipids were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alavaster, AL, USA). Organic reagents were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
Plasmids, siRNA sequences and transfectionsFor PLD1 targeting, previously described oligos were used,50 and knock
down efciency was assessed.51 For DGK targeting, we used the previously validated sequences 5-CUAUGUGACUGAAGAUCGCATT-3 and 5-GGUGAAGA GCUGAUUGAGGTT-3.22,38,52 DGK was silenced with
validated sequences;32 either a scrambled (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) or the equivalent mouse sequence was used as control. For transient targeting, distinct siRNAs were transfected in cells using Oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For stable targeting, sequences that target murine (control) or human DGK were cloned in the pSuperRetro vector (Oligoengine, Seattle, WA, USA), and SW480 cells stably expressing shRNAi were obtained by infection with pSuperRetro-cloned sequence-containing retroviruses using standard protocols.
Western blot analysisFor protein extraction from cultured cells and western blot analyses of extracted proteins, we used the ECL system (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) as previously described.22,32
mRNA expression analysis by PCR or quantitative PCRWhole RNA extraction, complementary DNA generation, PCR and quantitative PCR were performed as previously described.32 Primers for the genes analyzed were SREBP-1, forward 5-TCAGCGAGGCGGCTTT
GGAGCAG-3, reverse 5-GAGTCTGCCTTGATGAAGTG-3; FASN, forward 5-GAAACTGCAGGAGCTGTC-3, reverse 5-CACGGAGT TGAGCCGCAT-3; ACACA, forward 5-GCCTCTTCCTGACAAACGAG-3, reverse 5-GACTGCCG AAACATCTCTG-3; GAPDH, forward 5-ACAGCCTCAAGATCATCA GCAA-3, reverse 5-ATGGCATGGACTGTGGTCATG-3; actin, forward 5-GGCACC ACACCTTCTACAATG-3, reverse 5-GTGGTGGTGAAGCTGTAGCC-3.
DGK assays and DAG measurementDGK activity was measured as previously reported,32 using 1,2-dioleoyl (C18:1)-DAG or 1,2 dioctanoyl (C8)-DAG as substrate. For DAG measurement, cell lipids were extracted with a modication of the method of Bligh and Dyer53 that uses CHCl3/MeOH/HCl 12N (50:100:1 v/v/v) in the rst extraction step, and the lipid-containing organic phase was dried in a nitrogen stream. DAG and phospholipid-associated phosphate were measured as previously described.54
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
11
Exogenous DAG additionC8-DAG was nitrogen dried and resuspended in vesicle buffer (1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl; 5 mM nal concentration). Lipids were sonicated to form micelles (5 min, room temperature) and added to cell cultures (100 M
nal concentration). DAG or buffer were added every 90 min throughout the treatment period.
Colony formation assaysCells (5 102/well) were seeded in 12-well plates; medium was replaced with medium containing fetal bovine serum (10 or 1%) after 48 h. Drugs were added at indicated concentrations every 48 h for 7 days. Colony formation was determined as previously described.32
Mouse studiesFor all animal work, we used a protocol approved by the CNB/CSIC Ethical
Committee for Animal Experimentation (CEEA-CNB, no. 090004), in conformity with national and EU guidelines. Female BALB/c SCID mice aged 6 to 8 weeks received subcutaneous injections of SW480 cells. Tumor volume was estimated as volume = (a2 b)/2, where a is the tumor width and b is tumor length in mm. Pharmacological treatment was begun when tumors reached at least 150 mm3 (~15 days). The rapamycin dose, selected based on previously determined criteria,55 was administered intraperitoneally (10 mg/kg every 48 h for 10 days) and mouse weight was recorded to rule out toxic effects of the treatment. Mice were killed, tumors removed and weighed.
Statistical analysisData are represented as mean s.e.m.; statistical analysis was done with
GraphPad Prism 5 Software (La Jolla, CA, USA). Students t-test was used to compare two data sets. Welchs correction was applied when the variance was signicantly different as analyzed with F-test. When samples did not t normality as tested with the KolmogorovSmirnov test, the MannWhitney test was used. When more than two conditions were analyzed, we applied analysis of variance and Bonferroni post-test analysis. In all cases, when the P-value was o0.05, differences were considered statistically signicant (*Po0.05; **Po0.01; ***Po0.001).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank IM group members for helpful discussion, Dr A Gonzlez for advice and technical support with xenograft assays and C Mark for excellent editorial assistance. PT-A holds a FPU fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education, AA-F is supported by the Spanish Anti-Cancer Association (AECC) and the Madrid regional government. This work was supported in part by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity BFU2013-47640-P, Spanish Ministry of Health (Instituto de Salud Carlos III; RD12/0036/0059) and the Madrid regional government (IMMUNOTHERCAM Consortium S2010/BMD-2326) to IM.
REFERENCES
1 Yecies JL, Manning BD. mTOR links oncogenic signaling to tumor cell metabolism.
J Mol Med (Berl) 2011; 89: 221228.2 Zoncu R, Efeyan A, Sabatini DM. mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12: 2135.3 Holz MK, Ballif BA, Gygi SP, Blenis J. mTOR and S6K1 mediate assembly of the translation preinitiation complex through dynamic protein interchange and ordered phosphorylation events. Cell 2005; 123: 569580.4 Porstmann T, Santos CR, Grifths B, Cully M, Wu M, Leevers S et al. SREBP activity is regulated by mTORC1 and contributes to Akt-dependent cell growth. Cell Metab 2008; 8: 224236.5 Duvel K, Yecies JL, Menon S, Raman P, Lipovsky AI, Souza AL et al. Activation of a metabolic gene regulatory network downstream of mTOR complex 1. Mol Cell 2010; 39: 171183.6 Raghow R, Yellaturu C, Deng X, Park EA, Elam MB. SREBPs: the crossroads of physiological and pathological lipid homeostasis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2008; 19: 6573.
7 Owen JL, Zhang Y, Bae SH, Farooqi MS, Liang G, Hammer RE et al. Insulin stimulation of SREBP-1c processing in transgenic rat hepatocytes requires p70 S6-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 1618416189.
8 Huffman TA, Mothe-Satney I, Lawrence JC Jr. Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of lipin mediated by the mammalian target of rapamycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 10471052.
9 Luyimbazi D, Akcakanat A, McAuliffe PF, Zhang L, Singh G, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al. Rapamycin regulates stearoyl CoA desaturase 1 expression in breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2010; 9: 27702784.
10 Lewis CA, Grifths B, Santos CR, Pende M, Schulze A. Regulation of the SREBP transcription factors by mTORC1. Biochem Soc Trans 2011; 39: 495499.
11 Francipane MG, Lagasse E. mTOR pathway in colorectal cancer: an update. Oncotarget 2014; 5: 4966.
12 Fang Y, Vilella-Bach M, Bachmann R, Flanigan A, Chen J. Phosphatidic acid-mediated mitogenic activation of mTOR signaling. Science 2001; 294: 19421945.
13 Chen J, Zheng XF, Brown EJ, Schreiber SL. Identication of an 11-kDa FKBP12-rapamycin-binding domain within the 289-kDa FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein and characterization of a critical serine residue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 49474951.
14 Veverka V, Crabbe T, Bird I, Lennie G, Muskett FW, Taylor RJ et al. Structural characterization of the interaction of mTOR with phosphatidic acid and a novel class of inhibitor: compelling evidence for a central role of the FRB domain in small molecule-mediated regulation of mTOR. Oncogene 2008; 27: 585595.
15 Yoon MS, Sun Y, Arauz E, Jiang Y, Chen J. Phosphatidic acid activates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) kinase by displacing FK506 binding protein 38 (FKBP38) and exerting an allosteric effect. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 2956829574.
16 Lane HA, Breuleux M. Optimal targeting of the mTORC1 kinase in human cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21: 219229.
17 LoPiccolo J, Blumenthal GM, Bernstein WB, Dennis PA. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: effective combinations and clinical considerations. Drug Resist Updat 2008; 11: 3250.
18 Logue JS, Morrison DK. Complexity in the signaling network: insights from the use of targeted inhibitors in cancer therapy. Genes Dev 2012; 26: 641650.
19 Guo D, Prins RM, Dang J, Kuga D, Iwanami A, Soto H et al. EGFR signaling through an Akt-SREBP-1-dependent, rapamycin-resistant pathway sensitizes glioblastomas to antilipogenic therapy. Sci Signal 2009; 2: ra82.
20 Foster DA. Phosphatidic acid signaling to mTOR: signals for the survival of human cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009; 1791: 949955.
21 Merida I, Avila-Flores A, Merino E. Diacylglycerol kinases: at the hub of cell signalling. Biochem J 2008; 409: 118.
22 Avila-Flores A, Santos T, Rincon E, Merida I. Modulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway by diacylglycerol kinase-produced phosphatidic acid. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 1009110099.
23 You JS, Lincoln HC, Kim CR, Frey JW, Goodman CA, Zhong XP et al. The role of diacylglycerol kinase zeta and phosphatidic acid in the mechanical activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J Biol Chem 2014; 289: 15511563.
24 Lin YH, Chen YC, Kao TY, Lin YC, Hsu TE, Wu YC et al. Diacylglycerol lipase regulates lifespan and oxidative stress response by inversely modulating TOR signaling in Drosophila and C. elegans. Aging Cell 2014; 13: 755764.
25 Sabates-Bellver J, Van der Flier LG, de Palo M, Cattaneo E, Maake C, Rehrauer H et al. Transcriptome prole of human colorectal adenomas. Mol Cancer Res 2007; 5: 12631275.
26 Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 401404.
27 Cai K, Mulatz K, Ard R, Nguyen T, Gee SH. Increased diacylglycerol kinase zeta expression in human metastatic colon cancer cells augments Rho GTPase activity and contributes to enhanced invasion. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 208.
28 Provenzani A, Fronza R, Loreni F, Pascale A, Amadio M, Quattrone A. Global alterations in mRNA polysomal recruitment in a cell model of colorectal cancer progression to metastasis. Carcinogenesis 2006; 27: 13231333.
29 Ducker GS, Atreya CE, Simko JP, Hom YK, Matli MR, Benes CH et al. Incomplete inhibition of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 as a mechanism of primary resistance to ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitors. Oncogene 2014; 33: 15901600.
30 Gulhati P, Cai Q, Li J, Liu J, Rychahou PG, Qiu S et al. Targeted inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling inhibits tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 72077216.
31 Gharbi SI, Rincon E, Avila-Flores A, Torres-Ayuso P, Almena M, Cobos MA et al. Diacylglycerol kinase zeta controls diacylglycerol metabolism at the immunological synapse. Mol Biol Cell 2011; 22: 44064414.
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
DGK regulates lipid tumor metabolism P Torres-Ayuso et al
12
32 Torres-Ayuso P, Daza-Martin M, Martin-Perez J, Avila-Flores A, Merida I. Diacylglycerol kinase alpha promotes 3D cancer cell growth and limits drug sensitivity through functional interaction with Src. Oncotarget 2014; 5: 97109726.
33 Chen Y, Zheng Y, Foster DA. Phospholipase D confers rapamycin resistance in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2003; 22: 39373942.
34 Ramirez-Valle F, Badura ML, Braunstein S, Narasimhan M, Schneider RJ. Mitotic raptor promotes mTORC1 activity, G(2)/M cell cycle progression, and internal ribosome entry site-mediated mRNA translation. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30: 31513164.
35 O'Reilly KE, Rojo F, She QB, Solit D, Mills GB, Smith D et al. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 15001508.
36 Rozengurt E. Protein kinase D signaling: multiple biological functions in health and disease. Physiology 2011; 26: 2333.
37 Jiang Y, Sakane F, Kanoh H, Walsh JP. Selectivity of the diacylglycerol kinase inhibitor 3-[2-(4-[bis-(4-uorophenyl)methylene]-1-piperidinyl)ethyl]-2, 3-dihydro-2-thioxo-4(1H)quinazolinone (R59949) among diacylglycerol kinase subtypes. Biochem Pharmacol 2000; 59: 763772.
38 Gharbi SI, Avila-Flores A, Soutar D, Orive A, Koretzky GA, Albar JP et al. Transient PKCalpha shuttling to the immunological synapse is governed by (DGK)zeta and regulates L-selectin shedding. J Cell Sci 2013; 126: 21762186.
39 Ikenoue T, Inoki K, Yang Q, Zhou X, Guan KL. Essential function of TORC2 in PKC and Akt turn motif phosphorylation, maturation and signalling. EMBO J 2008; 27: 19191931.
40 Liu Q, Chang JW, Wang J, Kang SA, Thoreen CC, Markhard A et al. Discovery of 1-(4-(4-propionylpiperazin-1-yl)-3-(triuoromethyl)phenyl)-9-(quinolin-3- yl)benzo[h][1,6]naphthyridin-2(1H)-one as a highly potent, selective mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor for the treatment of cancer. J Med Chem 2010; 53: 71467155.41 Fiume R, Ramazzotti G, Teti G, Chiarini F, Faenza I, Mazzotti G et al. Involvement of nuclear PLCbeta1 in lamin B1 phosphorylation and G2/M cell cycle progression. FASEB J 2009; 23: 957966.42 Mall M, Walter T, Gorjanacz M, Davidson IF, Nga Ly-Hartig TB, Ellenberg J et al. Mitotic lamin disassembly is triggered by lipid-mediated signaling. J Cell Biol 2012; 198: 981990.43 Luo B, Prescott SM, Topham MK. Association of diacylglycerol kinase zeta with protein kinase C alpha: spatial regulation of diacylglycerol signaling. J Cell Biol 2003; 160: 929937.44 Facchinetti V, Ouyang W, Wei H, Soto N, Lazorchak A, Gould C et al. The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 controls folding and stability of Akt and protein kinase C. EMBO J 2008; 27: 19321943.
45 Partovian C, Ju R, Zhuang ZW, Martin KA, Simons M. Syndecan-4 regulates subcellular localization of mTOR Complex2 and Akt activation in a PKCalpha-dependent manner in endothelial cells. Mol Cell 2008; 32: 140149.
46 Masui K, Cavenee WK, Mischel PS. mTORC2 in the center of cancer metabolic reprogramming. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2014; 25: 364373.
47 Peterson TR, Sengupta SS, Harris TE, Carmack AE, Kang SA, Balderas E et al. mTOR complex 1 regulates lipin 1 localization to control the SREBP pathway.Cell 2011; 146: 408420.
48 Mitra MS, Chen Z, Ren H, Harris TE, Chambers KT, Hall AM et al. Mice with an adipocyte-specic lipin 1 separation-of-function allele reveal unexpected roles for phosphatidic acid in metabolic regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 642647.
49 Rodrik-Outmezguine VS, Chandarlapaty S, Pagano NC, Poulikakos PI, Scaltriti M, Moskatel E et al. mTOR kinase inhibition causes feedback-dependent biphasic regulation of AKT signaling. Cancer Discov 2011; 1: 248259.
50 Sun Y, Fang Y, Yoon MS, Zhang C, Roccio M, Zwartkruis FJ et al. Phospholipase D1 is an effector of Rheb in the mTOR pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 82868291.
51 Gozgit JM, Pentecost BT, Marconi SA, Ricketts-Loriaux RS, Otis CN, Arcaro KF.
PLD1 is overexpressed in an ER-negative MCF-7 cell line variant and a subset of phospho-Akt-negative breast carcinomas. Br J Cancer 2007; 97: 809817.
52 Rincon E, Santos T, Avila-Flores A, Albar JP, Lalioti V, Lei C et al. Proteomics identication of sorting nexin 27 as a diacylglycerol kinase zeta-associated protein: new diacylglycerol kinase roles in endocytic recycling. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007; 6: 10731087.
53 Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purication. Can J Biochem Physiol 1959; 37: 911917.
54 Flores I, Martinez AC, Hannun YA, Merida I. Dual role of ceramide in the control of apoptosis following IL-2 withdrawal. J Immunol 1998; 160: 35283533.
55 Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Sengupta S, Sheen JH, Hsu PP, Bagley AF et al. Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKB. Mol Cell 2006; 22: 159168.
Oncogenesis is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Oncogenesis website (http://www.nature.com/oncsis).
Oncogenesis (2015), 1 12
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2015
Abstract
Diacylglycerol kinases (DGKs) transform diacylglycerol (DAG) into phosphatidic acid (PA), balancing the levels of these key metabolic and signaling lipids. We previously showed that PA derived from the DGKζ isoform promotes mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activation. This function might be crucial for the growth and survival of cancer cells, especially for those resistant to the allosteric mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. How this positive function of DGKζ coordinates with DAG metabolism and signaling is unknown. In this study, we used a rapamycin-resistant colon cancer cell line as a model to address the role of DGKζ in tumor cells. We found that DGKζ predominated over other PA sources such as DGKα or phospholipase D to activate mTORC1, and that its activity was a component of the rapamycin-induced feedback loops. We show that the DGKζ DAG-consuming function is central to cell homeostasis, as DAG negatively regulates levels of the lipogenic transcription factor SREBP-1. Our findings suggest a model in which simultaneous regulation of DAG and PA levels by DGKζ is integrated with mTOR function to maintain tumor cell homeostasis; we provide new evidence of the crosstalk between mTOR and lipid metabolism that will be advantageous in the design of drug therapies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer