Citation: Transl Psychiatry (2014) 4, e419; doi:10.1038/tp.2014.58 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 2158-3188/14
http://www.nature.com/tp
Web End =www.nature.com/tp
RW Paterson1, JW Bartlett2, K Blennow3, NC Fox1, Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative6, LM Shaw4, JQ Trojanowski4, H Zetterberg3,5 and JM Schott1
We aimed to identify cerebrospinal uid (CSF) biomarkers associated with neurodegeneration in individuals with and without CSF evidence of Alzheimer pathology. We investigated 287 Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) subjects(age = 74.9 6.9; 22/48/30% with Alzheimers disease/mild cognitive impairment/controls) with CSF multiplex analyte data and serial volumetric MRI. We calculated brain and hippocampal atrophy rates, ventricular expansion and Mini Mental State Examination decline. We used false discovery rate corrected regression analyses to assess associations between CSF variables and atrophy rates in individuals with and without amyloid pathology, adjusting in stages for tau, baseline volume, p-tau, age, sex, ApoE4 status and diagnosis. Analytes showing statistically signicant independent relationships were entered into reverse stepwise analyses. Adjusting for tau, baseline volume, p-tau, age, sex and ApoE4, 4/83 analytes were signicantly independently associated with brain atrophy rate, 1/83 with ventricular expansion and 2/83 with hippocampal atrophy. The strongest CSF predictor for the three atrophy measures was low trefoil factor 3 (TFF3). High cystatin C (CysC) was associated with higher whole brain atrophy and hippocampal atrophy rates. Lower levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and chromogranin A (CrA) were associated with higher whole brain atrophy. In exploratory reverse stepwise analyses, lower TFF3 was associated with higher rates of whole brain, hippocampal atrophy and ventricular expansion. Lower levels of CrA were associated with higher whole brain atrophy rate. The relationship between low TFF3 and increased hippocampal atrophy rate remained after adjustment for diagnosis. We identied a series of CSF markers that are independently associated with rate of neurodegeneration in amyloid-positive individuals. TFF3, a substrate for
Translational Psychiatry (2014) 4, e419; doi:10.1038/tp.2014.58; published online 29 July 2014
INTRODUCTION
Although Alzheimers disease (AD) is a relentless progressive condition there is considerable variation in the rate of progression between individuals.1 Previous studies have suggested that atrophy rates may be affected by the age of onset,2 disease severity,3 by the concurrence of other pathologies including vascular disease4 and TDP43 burden.5 However, the majority of the variance in rates of atrophy between individuals remains unaccounted for.6 A more detailed understanding of factors inuencing this variability could allow for prognostication for patients, and aid in clinical trial design or interpretation where interindividual variance in atrophy rate increases required sample sizes;6 and provide insights into the underlying biology of AD, in turn leading to the discovery of new targets for disease prevention strategies. Biomarkers provide a means both of quantifying the rate of disease progression and exploring its inuences. Rates of atrophy, either of brain or brain substructures can be measured with a high degree of precision from serially acquired MRI and provide a robust measure of progression which correlates with
OPEN
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Cerebrospinal uid markers including trefoil factor 3 are associated with neurodegeneration in amyloid-positive individuals
NOTCH processing may be an important biomarker of neurodegeneration across the Alzheimer spectrum.
cognitive decline.7 Cerebrospinal uid (CSF) can be used to assess neuronal, synaptic, inammatory, and other proteins involved, or potentially involved, in AD pathogenesis.8 To date, A1-42 and tau are routinely measured as AD biomarkers,8 with good evidence that these are markers of AD pathology and predict cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment.9 What is less clear however is which CSF markers best reect rates of neuronal damage or loss in ADand therefore may be useful predictors of progression. A previous exploratory pilot study of CSF biomarkers in healthy elderly with amyloid pathology identied a number of analytes that may predict atrophy in specic brain regions.10 In this study
we aimed to assess whether any analytes in a large panel of CSF biomarkers were associated with increased rates of atrophy across the Alzheimer spectrum.
PATIENTS AND METHODS Subjects
We investigated subjects from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (adni.loni.ucla.edu), a multicenter publicly/privately funded
1Department of Neurodegeneration, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; 2Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 3Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mlndal, Sweden; 4Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA and 5Department of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK. Correspondence: Dr JM Schott, Department of Neurodegeneration, Dementia Research Centre, Box 16, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
E-mail: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected]
6Members of the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative are listed before References.
Received 9 January 2014; revised 23 May 2014; accepted 27 May 2014
Trefoil factor 3 predicts neurodegeneration rate RW Paterson et al
2
longitudinal study of individuals with AD, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and normal cognition. Institutional review boards approved the study and subjects gave written consent. Subjects underwent baseline and periodic clinical and neuropsychological assessment and serial MRI. Approximately 60% had CSF. A selected group had additional CSF analysis for the ADNI Biomarkers Consortium project Use of Targeted Multiplex Proteomic Strategies to Identify Novel Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Biomarkers in AD as described on the ADNI website. We downloaded data from LONI (http://adni.loni.ucla.edu
Web End =http://adni.loni.ucla.edu) that included all subjects with this supplementary CSF multiplex data. As our aim was to explore factors inuencing atrophy rates in individuals with AD pathology we dichotomised subjects using a baseline CSF A1-42 level of 192 pg ml1, a level shown to distinguish individuals with autopsy conrmed AD pathology and controls with ~ 96% sensitivity and ~ 77% specicity.11
We excluded subjects who did not have useable 1.5T MRI scans at baseline and 1 year, and one subject without a dened diagnosis. We recorded ApoE status and genotype at the rs7280100 SNP, which has been identied a candidate locus for trefoil factor 3 (TFF3),12 as well as Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline and 12 months.
Cerebrospinal uidCSF collection, processing and storage procedures have previously been described.11 Processing, aliquoting and storage was carried out according to the ADNI Biomarker Core Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures (http://adni-info.org/Scientists/Pdfs/adniproceduresmanual12.pdf
Web End =http://adni-info.org/Scientists/Pdfs/adniproceduresmanual12.pdf). Samples were analyzed using a multiplex-based immunoassay panel based upon Luminex immunoassay technology developed by Rules Based Medicine (MyriadRBM, Austin, TX, USA). CSF A1-42, total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and a panel of 159 analytes including inammatory, metabolic, lipid and other disease relevant analytes were tested. Data were prepared for analysis according to the biomarkers consortium statistical analysis plan (http://adni.loni.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011Dec28-Biomarkers-Consortium-Data-Primer-FINAL1.pdf
Web End =http://adni.loni.ucla.edu/wp-content/ http://adni.loni.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011Dec28-Biomarkers-Consortium-Data-Primer-FINAL1.pdf
Web End =uploads/2012/01/2011Dec28-Biomarkers-Consortium-Data-Primer-FINAL1. http://adni.loni.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011Dec28-Biomarkers-Consortium-Data-Primer-FINAL1.pdf
Web End =pdf ), and as previously described.13 Of 159 analytes, 76 had greater than 10% of quality control data missing, leaving 83 available for analysis. For each analyte, the normality of data was assessed by the ADNI Biomarkers Consortium: non-normal data were transformed using the Box and Cox technique.14
Image acquisitionDetails of the MRI methodology have previously been described.15 T1
weighted, inversion-recovery prepared structural images were acquired at baseline and 12 months on 1.5T MRI units using standardized protocols. Corrections for distortion due to gradient nonlinearity and for image intensity non-uniformity and scalings were made based on phantom measures. Images underwent central quality control evaluation for protocol compliance and internal quality control at the Dementia Research Centre.
Volume loss measurementImage analysis was performed using in-house MIDAS software.16 Whole brain and lateral ventricles were delineated semi-automatically and hippocampal volumes were measured using the automated HMAPS method.17 Volume loss (ml) between scans was obtained using the boundary shift integral (BSI) following a 9-degrees-of-freedom registration and differential bias correction of the follow-up to baseline scans. For lateral ventricles and hippocampi, change over time was quantied using the ventricular (VBSI)18 and hippocampal BSI (HBSI)17 respectively. Rates of volume loss were annualized using the interscan interval.
Statistical analysisTo assess the relationship between CSF analytes and rates of brain volume change, we tted separate regression models for rates of ventricular expansion, brain and hippocampal atrophy for each CSF variable, including baseline volume (brain, ventricular and hippocampal volume, respectively) and tau as covariates in both the amyloid positive and negative groups. Subsequent analyses in the amyloid-positive group alone were repeated including age, gender, APOE4 status and phospho-tau (p-tau) as additional covariates and nally also adjusting for baseline diagnosis (AD, MCI, control). We used an implementation of the false discovery rate (FDR) procedure19 with control at the 5% level to correct for multiple comparisons, and report the adjusted regression coefcients between
each atrophy rate and those CSF variables showing FDR signicant relationships. We then performed three exploratory reverse stepwise regression analyses to identify combinations of CSF analytes independently predicting increased rates of change for each measure, using FDR signicant CSF variables identied in the preceding step and the three sets of adjustment variables. In each stepwise analysis, the corresponding adjustment variables were forced to be included in regression models. Finally, we assessed whether CSF analytes were associated with cognitive function. We rst established whether there was a decline in MMSE between baseline and 12 months that was signicantly different from zero. We then determined if atrophy rates and decline in MMSE scores at 12 months were correlated using separate regression models for rates of ventricular expansion, brain and hippocampal atrophy. We then tted separate regression models for annualized change in MMSE score and each CSF variable found to be (after FDR control) associated with at least one atrophy measure.
The FDR procedure used was derived assuming independence between test statistics.19 However, it has been shown that the procedure is valid under certain types of dependence,20 and in a simulation study (results not shown) matching the analysis used here, the procedure correctly controlled the FDR at 5%.
To quantify the unadjusted group discrimination ability of the analytes that were FDR signicant adjusted for baseline brain volumes, sex, age, APOE4 status, tau and p-tau the area under the ROC curve for detecting between AD and control groups was estimated.
RESULTSBaseline group characteristicsA ow chart outlining subject inclusion is provided in Figure 1
The demographics, genetic characteristics, cognitive scores and atrophy measures of the 287 subjects included in this analysis are described in Table 1. The mean s.d. age of this group was74.9 6.9 years, 21.6% had a clinical diagnosis of AD, 48.1% MCI and 30.3% were controls. Eighty-three CSF analytes as well as CSF tau, A1-42 and p-tau were available for analysis (Supplementary Table 1).
Analytes predicting atrophyIn subjects without evidence for signicant amyloid deposition, that is, those with baseline CSF A1-42 4192 pg ml1, after adjusting for baseline brain volumes and CSF t-tau and with FDR correction to control for multiple comparisons, none of the CSF analytes was signicantly associated with any of the atrophy measures.
In subjects with CSF A1-42 192 pg ml1, after adjusting for baseline volumes and t-tau and with FDR correction to control for multiple comparisons, 10/83 analytes were associated with whole brain atrophy rate, 45/83 analytes with ventricular expansion rate, and 4/83 with hippocampal atrophy rate (Table 2). After additionally adjusting for p-tau, age, ApoE status and sex and with FDR correction to control for multiple comparisons, 4/83
287 ADNI subjects recruited to ADNI 1 with extended CSF analysis and Volumetric MRI at baseline and 12 months satisfying central quality control evaluation for protocol compliance and internal quality control at the Dementia Research Centre
Baseline CSF A1-42 192pg/ml (200 subjects)
Baseline CSF A1-42 >192pg/ml (87 subjects)
Figure 1. Subjects included in analysis. ADNI, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; CSF, cerebrospinal uid.
Translational Psychiatry (2014), 1 8 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
Trefoil factor 3 predicts neurodegeneration rate RW Paterson et al
3
Table 1. Baseline demographics, ApoE genotype, cognitive proles, CSF proles, brain volumes and 1 year atrophy rates of 200 subjects with A1-42 192 pg ml1 and 87 subjects with A1-424192 pg ml1
Subjects with A1-42 192 pg ml1 (n = 200)
Combined Controls (n = 33) MCI (n = 108) AD (n = 59)
Age at CSF exam (years) 74.8 6.7 76.5 5.5 74.4 7.0 74.5 7.4 Gender (% male) 59.4 54.5 63.9 52.5 APOE4 positive (%) 65.5 51.5 69.0 78.0 MMSE (mean) 26.1 2.5 29.1 0.1 26.7 1.8 23.5 1.8 Modied ADAS-cog 13.1 6.2 7.1 3.4 12.1 4.6 18.5 6.1 A1-42 (pg ml1) 137.2 22.7 146.5 25.5 136.5 29.0 133.1 23.2 t-tau (pg ml1) 114.4 55.3 82.5 30.7 115.3 56.0 130.7 57.7 p-tau (pg ml1) 39.5 17.5 31.2 17.4 39.8 15.4 43.6 19.8 KBSI (ml per year) 13.8 8.7 8.9 7.3 14.2 9 15.7 7.8 VBSI (ml per year) 3.8 3.1 2.1 2.0 3.8 3.1 4.9 3.1 HBSI (ml per year) 0.15 0.10 0.08 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 MMSE decline from baseline to 12 months (points per year; n = 199) 1.7 3.5 0.4 1.7 1.4 2.7 3.0 4.8 % of individuals with minor allele rs7280100 12.2 12.5 10.9 14.6
Subjects with A1-424192 pg ml1 (n = 87)
Combined Controls (n = 54) MCI (n = 30) AD (n = 3)
Age at CSF exam (years) 75.4 6.3 74.9 5.2 75.5 8.0 81.4 6 Gender (% male) 62.1 50 80 100 APOE4 positive (%) 89.6 90.7 86.7 100.0 MMSE (mean) 28.3 1.7 29.0 1.0 27.2 1.9 25.3 1.2 Modied ADAS-cog 7.6 1.4 5.7 2.5 10.5 3.8 14.4 6.8 A1-42 (pg ml1) 244.4 26.1 243.1 25.6 246.5 26.0 247.0 45.7 t-tau (pg ml1) 62.2 20.9 60.8 21.4 64.3 20.2 66 22.3 p-tau (pg ml1) 21.0 8.0 20.6 7.9 21.8 8.5 21.3 7.5 KBSI (ml per year) 6.0 6.7 4.7 5.4 7.5 8.0 12.6 10.5 VBSI (ml per year) 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.1 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.5 HBSI (ml per year) 0.05 0.1 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.1 0.1 0.06 MMSE decline from baseline to 12 months (points per year; n = 199) 0.1 1.6 0.06 1.3 0.2 2 0 2% of individuals with minor allele rs7280100 12.0 13.2 11.1 0
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimers disease; ADAS-cog, Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale; CSF, cerebrospinal uid; HBSI, hippocampal boundary shift integral; KBSI, whole brain boundary shift integral; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, mini mental state examination; p-tau, phosphorylated tau; t-tau, total tau; VBSI, ventricular boundary shift integral. Mean s.d. provided unless stated.
analytes were associated with whole brain atrophy rate, 1/83 analyte with ventricular expansion rate, and 2/83 with hippocampal atrophy rate (Table 2). These relationships are illustrated using scatter plots in Figure 2. After additionally adjusting for baseline diagnosis, only 2/83 analytes were associated with hippocampal atrophy, and none with brain atrophy or ventricular expansion (Table 2).
Lower levels of TFF3 were consistently associated with greater ventricular expansion (Po0.001), hippocampal atrophy rate (Po0.001) and whole brain atrophy rate (Po0.001) even after adjusting for baseline brain volumes, t-tau, p-tau, age, APOE status and sex. After additionally adjusting for baseline diagnosis, lower levels of TFF3 were still associated with higher hippocampal atrophy (P = 0.007). Higher levels of Cystatin C (CysC) were positively associated with all three atrophy measures after adjusting for baseline brain volumes and t-tau and remained predictive of higher whole brain (P = 0.009) and hippocampal atrophy (P = 0.034) after adjusting for p-tau, age, ApoE status and sex. Lower levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were positively associated with all three atrophy measures after adjusting for baseline brain volumes and t-tau and remained associated with higher whole brain atrophy (P = 0.023) after adjusting for p-tau, age, APOE status and sex. Lower levels of Chromogranin-A (CgA) were associated with higher whole brain atrophy (0.008) and ventricular expansion (0.009) after adjusting for baseline volumes and t-tau and predicts higher whole brain
atrophy (P = 0.009) after additionally adjusting for p-tau, age, ApoE status and sex.
In exploratory reverse stepwise models that included only those variables showing FDR signicant associations in the initial analyses (Table 3), lower levels of TFF3 were associated with higher rates of whole brain atrophy, ventricular expansion and hippocampal atrophy, even when, p-tau, age, APOE status and sex were included in the model. Lower levels of CgA were associated with higher whole brain atrophy and ventricular expansion when t-tau and baseline volume were included in the model; and with higher whole brain atrophy when p-tau, age, APOE status and sex were also included as covariates. In addition, adjusting for baseline diagnosis, TFF3 was the only analyte independently associated with hippocampal atrophy rate; and no analytes were (independently) associated with whole brain atrophy or ventricular expansion.
Twenty-three of the subjects had a minor allele at the rs7280100 locus (predicted to reduce CSF TFF3). These individuals had 18% higher rates of ventricular expansion, 14% higher rates of brain atrophy and 30% higher rates of hippocampal atrophy compared with noncarriers, the latter reaching borderline signicance after adjustment for baseline diagnosis, (P = 0.07).
2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited Translational Psychiatry (2014), 1 8
Trefoil factor 3 predicts neurodegeneration rate
RW Paterson et al
Table 2. Regression coefcients for dependence of atrophy measures on CSF with control for the false discovery rate in subjects with low CSF A1-42 (192 pg ml1): adjusted for baseline brain volumes and tau; adjusted for baseline brain volumes, sex, age, APOE4 status, t-tau and p-tau; adjusted for baseline brain volumes, sex, age, APOE4 status, t-tau, p-tau and baseline diagnosis
Brain atrophy Ventricular expansion Hippocampal atrophy
Regression coefcient
Adjusting for baseline brain volumes and t-tau
Alpha-1-Microglobulina (g ml1) 3.17 0.002 Alpha-2-Macroglobulina (mg ml1) 4.31 0.006Alpha-1-Antitrypsina (mg ml1) 0.19 0.018Angiotensin-converting enzymea (ng ml1) 3.17 0.027Angiopoietin-2a (ng ml1) 3.24 0.013Apolipoprotein A-Ia (mg ml1) 2.39 0.018Apolipoprotein C-IIIa(g ml1) 2.02 0.042Apolipoprotein Da (g ml1) 3.54 0.003Apolipoprotein Ea (g ml1) 14.71 0.017 0.26 0.002Apolipoprotein Ha (g ml1) 2.99 0.004AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (ng ml1) 1.59 0.01 0.40 0.018Beta-2-Microglobulina (g ml1) 3.87 0.018Complement C3a (mg ml1) 3.80 0.003CD-40 antigena (ng ml1) 5.20 0.004Chromogranin-A (ng ml1) 0.05 0.008 0.013 0.009Clusterina (g ml1) 11.90 0.023 4.20 0.002Cystatin-Ca (ng ml1) 32.89 0.003 10.77 o0.001 0.34 0.019
Fibroblast growth factor 4a (pg ml1) 3.45 0.022 Fibrinogena (mg ml1) 0.28 0.001 Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factora (pg ml1) 4.08 0.048 Hepatocyte growth factora (ng ml1) 2.59 0.048 Immunoglobulin Aa (mg ml1) 1.28 0.048 Interleukin-3a (ng ml1) 5.66 0.036 2.02 0.003 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (ng ml1) 0.017 0.004 Interferon gamma induced Protein 10a (pg ml1) 0.17 0.034 Lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1 (ng ml1) 0.30 0.006 Macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1a (ng ml1) 15.02 0.023 5.89 o0.001
Monokine induced by gamma interferona (pg ml1) 1.66 0.009 Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalina (ng ml1) 2.49 0.018 N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptidea(pg ml1)
3.91 0.006 0.15 0.035
Placenta growth factora (pg ml1) 2.34 0.043Pancreatic polypeptidea (pg ml1) 1.31 0.038Serum amyloid P-componenta (g ml1) 1.56 0.03Stem cell factora (pg ml1) 0.18 0.027Sex hormone-binding globulina (nmol/l) 2.23 0.018Thyroxine-binding globulina (g ml1) 0.18 0.023Tissue factora (g ml1) 11.79 0.017 3.73 0.003Trefoil factor 3a (g ml1) 14.69 0.003 6.19 o0.001 0.178 0.002
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1a (ng ml1) 3.88 0.015 Thrombomodulina (ng ml1) 2.52 0.045 Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2a (ng ml1) 4.05 0.007 TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 3a(ng ml1)
4.05 0.004
Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1a (ng ml1) 3.46 0.018Vascular endothelial growth factora (pg ml1) 21.32 0.004 6.86 o0.001 0.21 0.034 von Willebrand factora (g ml1) 4.18 0.003
Adjusting for baseline brain volumes, sex, age, APOE4 status, tau and p-tau
Chromogranin-A (ng ml1) 0.05 0.009
Cystatin-Ca (ng ml1) 32.58 0.009 0.35 0.034 Trefoil factor 3a (g ml1) 16.43 0.009 4.46 0.03 0.23 0.001 Vascular endothelial growth factora (pg ml1) 20.09 0.023
Adjusting for baseline brain volumes, sex, age, APOE4 status, tau, p-tau and baseline diagnosis
Trefoil factor 3a (g ml1) 0.21 0.007 N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptidea(pg ml1)
0.16 0.05
Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal uid; EGF, endothelial growth factor; FDR, false discovery rate; p-tau, phosphorylated tau; t-tau, total tau. aTransformed data. The statistics are presented for the transformed values (see Patients and Methods). Where data has been transformed, the units relate to data before transformation. None of the analytes in Supplementary Table 1 was FDR signicant except those shown in this table. Regression coefcients are shown for those measures showing FDR signicant (5% level) associations. P-values are FDR (5% level) corrected.
Translational Psychiatry (2014), 1 8 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
4
P Regression coefcient
P Regression coefcient
P
Trefoil factor 3 predicts neurodegeneration rate RW Paterson et al
5
Figure 2. Scatter plots of annualized atrophy (BSIwhole brain atrophy, HBSIhippocampal atrophy, VSBIventricular expansion) against analytes for those found to be associated (after FDR correction) with rates of volume change after adjusting for baseline volume, sex, age, APOE4 status, t-tau and p-tau. *, transformed data. Where data has been transformed (TFF3, CysC, VEGF), the units relate to data before transformation. AD, Alzheimers disease; CSF, cerebrospinal uid; BSI, boundary shift integral; FDR, false discovery rate; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; p-tau, phosphorylated tau; t-tau, total tau; TFF3, trefoil factor 3.
Analytes predicting cognitive declineIn subjects with CSF A1-42 4192 pg ml1, MMSE data at 12 months was available for all 87 subjects. The average decline was not statistically signicantly different from zero and therefore no further regression analyses were conducted in this group.
In subjects with CSF A1-42 192 pg ml1, MMSE data at 0 and 12 months was available for 199 subjects, who declined on average by 1.7 3.5 points per year. Change in MMSE score at 12 months was strongly associated with change in whole brain atrophy rate (regression coefcient = 0.15, Po0.001), ventricular expansion (0.49, Po0.001), and hippocampal atrophy rate. (11.16, Po0.001) Baseline levels of 11 CSF markersAXL, ApoE, CD-40 antigen, CgA, cystatin C, M-CSF, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), pregnancy-associated plasma protein, tissue factor, TFF3 and VEGFwere signicantly (without FDR correction) associated with decline in MMSE at 12 months.
Predictive valueFor those analytes that were FDR signicant in Table 2, the area under the ROC curve for detecting between AD and control groups were 0.59 (95% condence interval = 0.50, 0.69; CgA), 0.55(0.45, 0.64; CysC), 0.55 (0.45, 0.65; TFF3) and 0.61 (0.52, 0.70; VEGF).
For reference, the corresponding estimated values for t-tau and p-tau were 0.85 and 0.83, respectively.
DISCUSSIONCurrent models of AD pathogenesis suggest that deposition of brain A is a very early feature of AD, probably occurring before the onset of AD-related neuronal loss (that is, neurodegeneration).21 Rates of atrophy are signicantly increased in individuals with established AD,22 mild cognitive impairment due to AD,23 and in asymptomatic brain amyloidosis,24 and correlate more closely with cognitive decline and disease progression than amyloid burden or rate of accumulation.25 In this study, using a panel of analytes selected on the basis of relevance to a range of different diseases including cancer and autoimmune disorders as well as AD, we have identied a number of CSF biomarkers associated with increased rates of neurodegeneration. In particular, our results suggest that in individuals with evidence for brain amyloid deposition, CSF TFF3 level is associated both with rate of cognitive decline and with rates of brain and hippocampal atrophy and ventricular expansion.
Whilst we failed to nd an association between any analyte and rate of atrophy in the amyloid negative group, after allowance for
2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited Translational Psychiatry (2014), 1 8
Trefoil factor 3 predicts neurodegeneration rate
RW Paterson et al
6
1 ):when
adjustedfort-tauandbaselinevolume;whenadjustedforbaselinevolume,sex,age,APOE4status,t-tauandp-tau;whenadjustedforbaselinevolume,sex,age,APOE4status,t-tauandp-tauand
baselinediagnosis
PAnalyteAdjustedregression
coefcient
a (gml1 )0.18o0.001
Chromogranin-A(ngml1 )0.040.006Fibrinogena (mgml1 )1.40.002
Angiotensin-convertingenzymea
(ngml1 )
a (gml1 )0.23o0.001
Chromogranin-A(ngml1 )0.040.004
TFF3a (gml1 )0.23o0.001
4.30.012
4.20.030
Chromogranin-A(ngml1 )0.010.032
Adjustedforbaselinevolume,sex,age,APOE4status,t-tauandp-tau
PAnalyteAdjustedregression
coefcient
Abbreviations:CSF,cerebrospinaluid;FDR,falsediscoveryrate;p-tau,phosphorylatedtau;t-tau,totaltau;TFF3,trefoilfactor3.a Transformeddata.Thestatisticsarepresentedforthetransformedvalues(see
PatientsandMethods).Wheredatahasbeentransformedtheunitsrelatetodatabeforetransformation.P-valuesshownheredonotaccountformultiplecomparisons.
P
Table3.ExploratoryreversestepwiseregressionanalysisofCSFanalyteswithanFDRsignicantassociationwithbrainatrophymeasurementinsubjectswithlowCSFA1-42(192pgml
BrainatrophyVentricularexpansionHippocampalatrophy
TFF3a (gml1 )12.30.001TFF3a (gml1 )4.7o0.001TFF3
Macrophagecolony-stimulatingfactor1a
(ngml1 )
TFF3a (gml1 )13.20.004TFF3a (gml1 )4.5o0.001TFF3
multiple comparisons in the amyloid-positive group in which we adjusted for baseline brain volume and t-tau, we found that 45 analytes predicted increased ventricular expansion and ten predicted rate of whole brain atrophy. Ventricular expansion and brain atrophy are closely correlated,26 and as expected, all ten factors predicting increased rates of whole brain atrophy also predicted increased ventricular expansion. The higher precision with which rate of ventricular change can be quantied18 is likely
to explain the larger number of analytes associated with ventricular expansion compared with whole brain loss.
When we additionally adjusted for p-tau, ApoE status and sex, adjusting for multiple comparisons, the number of factors associated with rates of neurodegeneration in the amyloid-positive group alone was considerably reduced, with only four analytes showing an association with rates of neurodegeneration. Lower levels of TFF3, VEGF and CrA and higher levels of CysC were associated with increased rates of brain atrophy; lower levels of TFF3 with increased ventricular expansion; and lower levels of TFF3 and higher levels of CysC with increased rates of hippocampal atrophy. In exploratory reverse stepwise analyses, TFF3 was signicantly associated with rate of decline in all three measures (Table 3), with an effect both independent from and at least as great as CSF t-tau, which as expected, also (unadjusted) predicted all three measures of neurodegeneration.27 The effect
of TFF3 persisted even once baseline p-tau, age, sex and APOE4 status had been accounted for (Table 3), and was still associated with rate of hippocampal atrophy even once clinical diagnosis (for example, control/MCI/AD) had been accounted for. These results therefore support an association between CSF TFF3 and increased rates of neurodegeneration independent of established CSF biomarkers in individuals with amyloid deposition, suggesting that CSF TFF3 may be a novel and valuable biomarker of decline across the spectrum of AD.
Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3)
Encoded by the TFF3 gene on chromosome 21, TFF3 is a protein expressed by secretory epithelial cells principally in the gastrointestinal tract, and also in human hypothalamus and pituitary,28
and in the hippocampi, temporal cortices and cerebellum of mice.29 Its function in the central nervous system is unknown,29 although TFF3 administration to mice has been reported to improve memory.30 In the periphery, TFF3 has important roles in NOTCH processing, and measurement of TFF3 in blood/urine/ faeces has been patented31 and used32 as a means of assessing NOTCH-related side-effects in trials of gamma-secretase inhibitors for the treatment of AD. To our knowledge, this is the rst study to implicate TFF3 as a marker for neurodegeneration across the AD spectrum, and furthermore to show that this is independent of t-tau and p-tau: while there are few data on which to suggest mechanisms, one intriguing possibility is that this effect might in some way be mediated by alterations in gamma-secretase processing. While numbers with a minor allele were too small for anything more than an exploratory analysis, the observation that genotype at the rs7280100, a candidate locus associated with TFF3, is intriguing, and if replicated in independent samples, suggests that CSF TFF3 and/or the rs7280100 genotype may both help predict the rate of neurodegeneration in individuals with amyloid pathology; and that elucidating the function of TFF3 in the central nervous system may provide insights into mechanisms inuencing neurodegeneration in the presence of brain amyloidosis.
Cystatin C (CysC), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Chromogranin-A (CgA)
Of the other three biomarkers emerging prominently from our analyses, CysC colocalizes with amyloid in amyloid plaques, amyloid-laden vascular walls in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and
AnalyteAdjustedregression
coefcient
Adjustedforbaselinevolume,sex,age,APOE4status,t-tauandp-tauandbaselinediagnosis
Adjustedfort-tauandbaselinevolume
Translational Psychiatry (2014), 1 8 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
Trefoil factor 3 predicts neurodegeneration rate RW Paterson et al
7
in Downs syndrome and is typically reduced in AD CSF, with multiple lines of evidence suggesting that it has protective roles in AD principally due to inuences on amyloid processing and deposition.33 Conversely, increased CysC immunoreactivity is seen in specic neuronal population in AD suggesting a role in neurodegeneration;33 and in dopaminergic neurons, CysC has been shown to have a role in neuronal injury-mediated microglial activation and neurotoxicity.34 Our nding of a positive relationship between rates of atrophy and CysC, in individuals in whom amyloid deposition has already occurred, could therefore be explained in terms of a harmful neuroinammatory response which results in neuronal damage. VEGF, abundantly expressed in the CNS, has roles in modulation of angiogenesis, vascular remodelling, repair, permeability and inammation,35 and is
involved in microglial chemotaxis perhaps reecting an early response to amyloid deposition.36 Our nding of increased atrophy with lower levels of CSF VEGF is consistent with VEGF having a protective role in AD, and in keeping with reports that transgenic AD mice with increased neuronal expression of VEGF have a functional improvement in memory,35 suggests that upregulation of VEGF may be a useful therapeutic strategy for AD. Increased levels of CSF VEGF has been seen in individuals with AD and vascular dementia compared with controls37this could
also represent a protective response although VEGF levels were not correlated with rate of atrophy or rate of cognitive decline., The neuroendocrine secretory protein CgA is the major protein of large dense-core synaptic vesicles and may be a marker of synaptic dysfunction.38 In one study lower CSF levels of CgA were reported in the CSF of subjects with early onset sporadic or familial Alzheimers disease,39 potentially in keeping with our nding of inverse relationship between CgA level and increased rates of brain atrophy and ventricular expansion.
In a previous study using this same panel of analytes, ten CSF measures (ACE, CgA, AXL, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor, CD-40, M-CSF, beta-2-microglobulin, stem cell factor, CLU and IL-3) were shown to predict increased rates of amyloid deposition in cognitively normal elderly individuals.13 When
comparing these results aiming at identifying markers predicting rate of amyloid accumulation in healthy controls with ours (assessing rate of neurodegeneration in individuals with likely amyloid pathology) it is notable that in our initial analysis, we identied ve CSF analytes common to both: AXL, CgA, CLU, IL-3 and M-CSF; and including more stringent covariates that CgA remained a consistent nding. While this could reect that rates of amyloid deposition and brain atrophy are highly correlatedas would be predicted in the mid-phase of AD pathogenesisthis would also be consistent with common mechanisms linking amyloid deposition to subsequent neurodegeneration. However, the fact that TFF3, CysC and VEGF were not identied in previous analyses may suggest that these analytes may be exerting their effects on neurodegeneration independent of amyloid deposition.
This study has a number of limitations. The number of subjects is relatively small, particularly relative to the number of analytes, and these ndings thus require replication in other, larger cohorts. However, we have used a statistical procedure to control for multiple comparisons, indicating that the evidence for associations is moderately strong. While the use of reverse stepwise analysis must be considered exploratory, the consistency with which TFF3 emerges as a strong independent predictor of atrophy is striking. However, it is perhaps less surprising that the same analytes often predict all three atrophy measures, given that the atrophy measures are mutually correlated. A relatively small percentage of the variance in atrophy rates is explained by these ndings suggesting that other factors and other biomarkers reecting other independent pathways have yet to be identied, noting that a certain proportion of variance may also be due to measurement error. Including all individuals with low A1-42 in our analysis assumes that all patients with brain amyloidosis are
on the same neuropathological spectrum. While larger, more homogeneous samples are required to assess whether the relationships we show are driven by individuals with asymptomatic amyloidosis, MCI or established AD, it is notable that the relationship between TFF3 and hippocampal atrophy remains even after adjusting for clinical diagnosiswhich in this study probably simply reects different stages of disease.
We have identied a number of CSF markers that may be associated with the rate of neurodegeneration in individuals with amyloid deposition. These candidate biomarkers warrant further investigation, potentially providing prognostic information for patients; covariates for clinical trials; and insights into AD biology. While several of the CSF biomarkers hint at immune-mediated links between responses to amyloid deposition and brain volume loss, the function of TFF3, which we found to be the single strongest predictor of neurodegeneration across the spectrum of brain amyloidosis, is unknown. Further studies to replicate these ndings and in particular to investigate the role of TFF3 in the pathogenesis of AD are required.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTThe authors declare no conict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the support of Iceland Foods, the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre and Alzheimers Research UK. This work was supported by the NIHR Queen Square Dementia BRU. We are very grateful to the reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions. Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and through generous contributions from the following: Alzheimers Association; Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundation; BioClinica; Biogen Idec; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Eisai; Elan Pharmaceuticals; Eli Lilly and Company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche and its afliated company Genentech; GE Healthcare; Innogenetics, N.V.; IXICO; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC; Medpace; Merck; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC; NeuroRx Research; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pzer; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Synarc; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (http://www.fnih.org
Web End =www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study at the University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. This research was also supported by NIH grants P30 AG010129 and K01 AG030514.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSRWP, JWB, HZ, KB, NCF and JMS were involved in study design.
The investigators within the ADNI, JQT and LMS contributed to the design and implementation. RWP, JWB, JMS conducted the statistical analysis, RWP wrote the manuscript rst draft, which was reviewed and edited by NCF, JMS, LMS, JQT, HZ and JWB.
MEMBERS OF THE ALZHEIMERS DISEASE NEUROIMAGING INITIATIVE
Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf
2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited Translational Psychiatry (2014), 1 8
Trefoil factor 3 predicts neurodegeneration rate RW Paterson et al
8
REFERENCES
1 Schott JM, Frost C, Whitwell JL, Macmanus DG, Boyes RG, Rossor MN et al.
Combining short interval MRI in Alzheimers disease: implications for therapeutic trials. J Neurol 2006; 253: 11471153.2 Woo JI, Kim JH, Lee JH. Age of onset and brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Int Psychogeriatr 1997; 9: 183196.3 Chan D, Janssen JC, Whitwell JL, Watt HC, Jenkins R, Frost C et al. Change in rates of cerebral atrophy over time in early-onset Alzheimer's disease: longitudinal MRI study. Lancet 2003; 362: 11211122.4 Barnes J, Carmichael OT, Leung KK, Schwarz C, Ridgway GR, Bartlett JW et al. Vascular and Alzheimers disease markers independently predict brain atrophy rate in Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative controls. Neurobiol Aging 2013; 34: 19962002.5 Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Knopman DS, Hu WT, Stroh DA, Baker M et al. Abnormal TDP-43 immunoreactivity in AD modies clinicopathologic and radiologic phenotype. Neurology 2008; 70: 18501857.6 Schott JM, Bartlett JW, Barnes J, Leung KK, Ourselin S, Fox NC. Reduced sample sizes for atrophy outcomes in Alzheimers disease trials: baseline adjustment. Neurobiol Aging 2010; 31: 14521462.7 Fox NC, Scahill RI, Crum WR, Rossor MN. Correlation between rates of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in AD. Neurology 1999; 52: 16871689.8 Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, Zetterberg H. Cerebrospinal uid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6: 131144.9 Hansson O, Zetterberg H, Buchhave P, Londos E, Blennow K, Minthon L. Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimers disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 228234.10 Mattsson N, Insel P, Nosheny R, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM, Jack CR Jr et al. Effects of cerebrospinal uid proteins on brain atrophy rates in cognitively healthy older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: 614622.11 Shaw LM, Vanderstichele H, Knapik-Czajka M, Clark CM, Aisen PS, Petersen RC et al. Cerebrospinal uid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects. Ann Neurol 2009; 65: 403413.12 Kauwe J, Bailey M, Ridge P, Cruchaga C, Foutz S, Perry R et al. Association of genetic variants with cerebrospinal uid protein levels of ACE, MMP3 and other proteins and risk for Alzheimers disease. Alzheimers Dement 2013; 9: 677678.13 Mattsson N, Insel P, Nosheny R, Zetterberg H, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM et al. CSF protein biomarkers predicting longitudinal reduction of CSF beta-amyloid42 in cognitively healthy elders. Transl Psychiatry 2013; 3: e293.14 Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J Roy Stat Soc B 1964; 26: 211252.15 Jack CR Jr, Bernstein MA, Fox NC, Thompson P, Alexander G, Harvey D et al. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 685691.16 Freeborough PA, Fox NC. The boundary shift integral: an accurate and robust measure of cerebral volume changes from registered repeat MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 623629.17 Leung KK, Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett JW, Clarkson MJ, Macdonald K et al. Automated cross-sectional and longitudinal hippocampal volume measurement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2010; 51: 13451359.18 Schott JM, Price SL, Frost C, Whitwell JL, Rossor MN, Fox NC. Measuring atrophy in Alzheimer disease: a serial MRI study over 6 and 12 months. Neurology 2005; 65: 119124.19 Klipper-Aurbach Y, Wasserman M, Braunspiegel-Weintrob N et al. Mathematical formulae for the prediction of the residual beta cell function during the rst two years of disease in children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Hypotheses 1995; 45: 486490.20 Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafka N, Golani I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res 2001; 125: 279284.
21 Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Weiner MW, Aisen PS et al.
Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer's disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 207216.
22 Fox NC, Schott JM. Imaging cerebral atrophy: normal ageing to Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 2004; 363: 392394.
23 Jack CR Jr., Shiung MM, Gunter JL, OBrien PC, Weigand SD, Knopman DS et al.
Comparison of different MRI brain atrophy rate measures with clinical disease progression in AD. Neurology 2004; 62: 591600.
24 Andrews KA, Modat M, Macdonald KE, Yeatman T, Cardoso MJ, Leung KK et al.
Atrophy rates in asymptomatic amyloidosis: implications for Alzheimer prevention trials. PloS One 2013; 8: e58816.
25 Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, Brown B, Ellis KA, Salvado O et al. Amyloid beta deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 357367.
26 Whitwell JL, Petersen RC, Negash S, Weigand SD, Kantarci K, Ivnik RJ et al. Patterns of atrophy differ among specic subtypes of mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 11301138.
27 Blennow K, Hampel H. CSF markers for incipient Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 605613.
28 Probst JC, Zetzsche T, Weber M, Theilemann P, Skutella T, Landgraf R et al. Human intestinal trefoil factor is expressed in human hypothalamus and pituitary: evidence for a novel neuropeptide. FASEB J 1996; 10: 15181523.
29 Hinz M, Schwegler H, Chwieralski CE, Laube G, Linke R, Pohle W et al. Trefoil factor family (TFF) expression in the mouse brain and pituitary: changes in the developing cerebellum. Peptides 2004; 25: 827832.
30 Shi HS, Yin X, Song L, Guo QJ, Luo XH. Neuropeptide Trefoil factor 3 improves learning and retention of novel object recognition memory in mice. Behav Brain Res 2012; 227: 265269.
31 Denton R, Meredith JE. Gamma secretase Notch biomarkers. US patent US 7,989,208; 2011.
32 Tong G, Wang JS, Sverdlov O, Huang SP, Slemmon R, Croop R et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study of the oral gamma-secretase inhibitor BMS-708163 (Avagacestat): tolerability prole, pharmacokinetic parameters, and pharmacodynamic markers. Clin Ther 2012; 34: 654667.
33 Kaur G, Levy E. Cystatin C in Alzheimer's disease. Front Mol Neurosci 2012; 5: 79.34 Dutta G, Barber DS, Zhang P, Doperalski NJ, Liu B. Involvement of dopaminergic neuronal cystatin C in neuronal injury-induced microglial activation and neurotoxicity. J Neurochem 2012; 122: 752763.35 Religa P, Cao R, Religa D, Xue Y, Bogdanovic N, Westaway D et al. VEGF signicantly restores impaired memory behavior in Alzheimers mice by improvement of vascular survival. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 2053.36 McLarnon JG. Microglial chemotactic signaling factors in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Neurodegener Dis 2012; 1: 199204.37 Tarkowski E, Issa R, Sjogren M, Wallin A, Blennow K, Tarkowski A et al. Increased intrathecal levels of the angiogenic factors VEGF and TGF-beta in Alzheimers disease and vascular dementia. Neurobiol Aging 2002; 23: 237243.38 Fagan AM, Perrin RJ. Upcoming candidate cerebrospinal uid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Biomark Med 2012; 6: 455476.39 Blennow K, Davidsson P, Wallin A, Ekman R. Chromogranin A in cerebrospinal uid: a biochemical marker for synaptic degeneration in Alzheimers disease?.Dementia 1995; 6: 306311.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Web End =3.0/
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Translational Psychiatry website (http://www.nature.com/tp)
Translational Psychiatry (2014), 1 8 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2014
Abstract
We aimed to identify cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers associated with neurodegeneration in individuals with and without CSF evidence of Alzheimer pathology. We investigated 287 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) subjects (age=74.9±6.9; 22/48/30% with Alzheimer's disease/mild cognitive impairment/controls) with CSF multiplex analyte data and serial volumetric MRI. We calculated brain and hippocampal atrophy rates, ventricular expansion and Mini Mental State Examination decline. We used false discovery rate corrected regression analyses to assess associations between CSF variables and atrophy rates in individuals with and without amyloid pathology, adjusting in stages for tau, baseline volume, p-tau, age, sex, ApoE4 status and diagnosis. Analytes showing statistically significant independent relationships were entered into reverse stepwise analyses. Adjusting for tau, baseline volume, p-tau, age, sex and ApoE4, 4/83 analytes were significantly independently associated with brain atrophy rate, 1/83 with ventricular expansion and 2/83 with hippocampal atrophy. The strongest CSF predictor for the three atrophy measures was low trefoil factor 3 (TFF3). High cystatin C (CysC) was associated with higher whole brain atrophy and hippocampal atrophy rates. Lower levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and chromogranin A (CrA) were associated with higher whole brain atrophy. In exploratory reverse stepwise analyses, lower TFF3 was associated with higher rates of whole brain, hippocampal atrophy and ventricular expansion. Lower levels of CrA were associated with higher whole brain atrophy rate. The relationship between low TFF3 and increased hippocampal atrophy rate remained after adjustment for diagnosis. We identified a series of CSF markers that are independently associated with rate of neurodegeneration in amyloid-positive individuals. TFF3, a substrate for NOTCH processing may be an important biomarker of neurodegeneration across the Alzheimer spectrum.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer