Procalcitonin as diagnostic marker of infection in solid tumors patients with fever

Abstract

In oncologic patients fever is a non-specific clinical marker of different clinical settings. Procalcitonin (PCT) seems to be the most promising infection marker. We aimed to define the potential role of PCT as an earlier diagnostic marker in patients with fever and solid tumor. This retrospective study enrolled 431 patients. All of them performed hemoculture (HE) and basal PCT assessment (reference laboratory cut-off: ≤0.5 or >0.5 ng/dL) before starting antibiotic therapy. Gram positive (G+), negative (G-) or Fungi infection were detected. A statistically significant difference in PCT levels between patients with positive and negative HE was observed (P < 0.0001). Moreover comparing PCT values in patients with positive and negative HE, we obtain in the positive HE subpopulation an AUC of 0.7 and a cut-off of 1.52 ng/dL reached high sensitivity (61.6%) and specificity (70.1%). Using this last cut-off, instead of the normal reference value, we achieve a risk reduction to overestimate an infection status of 23.4%. We support the clinic usefulness of serum PCT dosage in febrile advanced solid tumor patients. A PCT cut-off of 1.52 ng/dL could be helpful in the management of the antibiotic therapy preventing delays of oncologic treatments.

Procalcitonin as diagnostic marker of infection in solid tumors patients with fever

R

P

B.Vincenzi, I. Fioroni, F. Pantano, S. Angeletti, G. Dicuonzo, A. Zoccoli, D. Santini & G.Tonini

as an earlier diagnostic marker in patients with fever and solid tumor. This retrospective study enrolled > +), negative (G) or <

We support the clinic usefulness of serum PCT dosage in febrile advanced solid tumor patients. A PCT oncologic treatments.

Oncologic patients are at high risk for developing infections; this could lead to hospitalization, interruptions in therapy schedules, and even death. Neutropenia is recognized as one of the most serious hematologic toxicity during cancer treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy and it is a very common risk factor of infections in oncologic patients. Other important predisposing factors to bacterial infections are skin and mucosal barrier disruption, dysfunction of cell-mediated immunity, obstruction of bronchial tree, biliary tract, urinary tract and gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system dysfunction and some diagnostic and therapeutic invasive procedures1.

In oncologic patients, fever is a non-specic clinical marker and it could represent a sign of several dierent clinical settings such as drugs reaction, real infection status or a paraneoplastic syndrome called also neoplastic fever2. It is necessary to recognize an infection or a non-infection status earlier3. Nowadays, among several known bio-markers, procalcitonin (ProCT) seems the most promising4. ProCT is a hormokine composed of 116 amino acids and it is the precursor of the hormone calcitonin composed of only 33 amino acids5. A generalized release of ProCT as expression of inammatory reaction can be induced through the direct stress of bacterial toxins or indirectly through the humoral host or cell-mediated inammatory response6. ProCT value increases rapidly within 24hours from the onset of a bacterial infection7. It has an half-life of 2224hours and therefore its concentration may be halved daily when infection is resolving8. ProCT rises mostly during Gram-negative systemic infections and its concentration reects bacterial load9. ProCT in oncologic neutropenic febrile patients was examinated in several studies but a recent meta-analysis failed to dene its specic role10. Only few studies regarding non-neutropenic oncologic patients were performed11. In this population the onset of an unknown origin fever could lead a diagnostic issue. Therefore Shomali et al. explored ProCT role as a bio-marker to dierentiate an infectious origin fever and a non-infectious origin fever in non-neutropenic patients with both solid tumors and hematological malignancies12. Our study aimed to dening the potential role of ProCT, used as an earlier diagnostics biomarker13,14, in a cohort of patients with fever and with diagnosed solid tumor followed in our oncologic ceter consecutively.

Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy. Clinical Pathology and Microbiology Laboratory, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.T. (email: [email protected])

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

1

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Analytical characteristics of PCT

Analytical detection limit 0.02ng/mL Functional sensitivity 0.06ng/mL Measuring range 0.0250ng/mL Intra-assay CV (%) 10% Adult reference limit 0.064ng/mL

Table 1. Analytical characteristics of PCT measured by an automated Kryptor analyzer, using a time-resolved amplied cryptate emission (TRACE) technology assay (Kryptor PCT;Brahms AG; Hennigsdorf, Germany).

Patients population. This is a single institution, retrospective, observational study. The investigations were performed aer approval by the Ethic Committee of the University Hospital Campus Bio-Medico of Rome and all experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. 431 consecutive patients were enrolled; all of them presented a known diagnosis of solid metastatic or locally advanced tumor (not operable) and were admitted to Medical Oncology Department of Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital of Rome between January 2009 and March 2013 with fever (>38.3 C or 2 consecutive >38 C readings). All patients performed hemoculture and basal PCT assessment before starting any empirical antibiotic therapy. Previous antibiotic treatment started within 4 weeks before hospital admission was considered an exclusion criterion. Patients was stratied for positive or negative hemoculture (bacteremia or fungemia) and PCT according to the normal reference laboratory cut-o (PCT value 0,5 ng/dL or >0.5 ng/dL). Patients with positive hemoculture were further categorized according to the presence of a Gram positive (G+), Gram negative (G) or Fungi infection.

Test methods. Each blood culture comprised three sets (time 0, time 30 and time 60) of one aerobic and one anaerobic broth bottles (Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, Becton Dickinson) per patient drawn during 1h period from cases of clinically suspected bloodstream infection. Blood culture vials were incubated in the Bactec 9240 automated system (Becton Dickinson). From positive broths, subcultures were prepared and, according to the appearance of colonies on subculture plates, the isolates were identied and the antimicrobial susceptibility test performed by Vitek 2.0 compact instrument (bioMerieux sa, Marcy l Etoile, France) or Phoenix (Becton Dickinson) instrument with the support of some additional phenotypic tests (such as coagulase test, PYR test and oxidase test). The signicance of possible contaminants of blood cultures was assessed by dierent personnel and according to standard criteria. Laboratory conrmed bloodstream infection had to meet at least one of the following criteria: the patient had a recognized pathogen cultured from one or more blood cultures or the patient has systemic signs of infection (dened as meeting the SIRS criteria) and a common skin contaminant (e.g., coagulase-negative Staphylococci or micrococci) cultured from two or more blood cultures drawn on separate occasions. PCT was assessed in our central laboratory by an immunoluminometric assay. PCT plasma concentrations were measured by an automated Kryptor analyzer, using a time-resolved amplied cryptate emission (TRACE) technology assay (Kryptor PCT; Brahms AG; Hennigsdorf, Germany), with commercially available immunoluminometric assays (Brahms)15. PCT was measured at the same moment that a blood culture was delivered to the laboratory. The analytical characteristics of the assays are summarized in Table1.

A ROC analysis was performed in order to identify the optimal cut-o point for PCT values in G+, G and Fungi hemoculture positive patients. Area under the curve (AUC) was also computed. Non parametric Mann-Whitney test was used in order to assess statistically signicance dierence in PCT value between the patients subgroups. P values <0.05 were considered to be signicant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS soware (vers. 17).

Results

Population characteristics. This retrospective, observational study enrolled 431 patients. The population included 235 male and 196 female patients and every patients were at least 18 years old. 343 patients were aected by the most common tumors such as: colon-rectal cancer (80 patients), pancreatic cancer (53 patients), non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 49 patients), breast cancer (42 patients), ovarian cancer (23 patients), biliary tract cancer (21 patients), gastric cancer (19 patients), small cell lung cancer (SCLC, 16 patients), bladder cancer (15 patients), kidney cancer (15 patients) and prostate cancer (10 patients). All others 88 patients had rarer cancers. The majority of patients showed distant metastasis (368 patients) and only 63 patients presented locally advanced not operable tumors. Among the whole population, 89 patients had clinical or radiological evidence of localized bacterial infection such as pneumonia, cholangitis, abscess and urinary tract infection (Table2).

Among the 431 enrolled solid tumor febrile patients, 181 (42%) showed a positive hemoculture while 250 (58%) a negative one. We perform PCT analysis for each patient and consider a PCT cut-o value of 0.5ng/dL. Successively we stratied our population into two groups: patients with PCT value 0.5 ng/dL and patients with PCT value >0.5 ng/dL. As a result we obtain that 271 patients (62.9%) showed a PCT value >0.5 ng/dL and 160 patients (37.1%) 0.5 ng/dL. Analyzing these data more in details we observe that 128 (80%) patients with PCT value 0.5ng/dL presented a negative hemoculture while only 32 (20%) of them showed a positive hemoculture; among patients with PCT value >0.5 ng/dL, 149 (55%) had a positive hemoculture and 122 (45%) a negative one. The PCT median value in the hemoculture

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

2

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Patients Characteristics

Age

1860 years 149 34.6 6170 years 126 29.2 >70 years 156 36.2 Gender

Male 235 54.5 Female 196 45.5 Underlying Cancer

Colon-rectal cancer 80 18.5 Other gastrointestinal cancers 93 21.6 Thoracic cancers 65 15 Genitourinary cancers 63 14.6 Breast cancer 42 9.7 Others 88 20.6 Cancer Stage

Locally Advanced Cancer 63 14.6 Distal Metastasis (IV) 368 85.4 Type of infection:

Urinary tract infections 31 7.2 Cholangitis 28 6.5 Pneumonia 19 4.4 Abscess 11 2.5

Table 2. Demographic and Clinical patients characteristics.

Figure 1. (A) Hemoculture stratication for PCT 0.5ng/dL patients; (B) Hemoculture stratication for PCT >0.5ng/dL patients.

positive population was 16.81 (95% CI: 8.29429.320) vs. 4.72 (95% CI: 3.0696.365) in the group of negative hemoculture one. Applying the Mann Whitney test we obtain a statistically signicant dierence in PCT value between the two patients subgroups (P< 0.0001) (Figs1A,B and 2).

Comparing dierent cancer hystologies no signicant dierences were detected in terms of PCT median levels; CRC patients were used as control group for median comparisons.

Moreover comparing PCT values in patients with positive and negative hemoculture, through the ROC analysis, we demonstrate an AUC of 0.7 and a cut-o value of 1.52 ng/dL in the positive hemoculture subpopulation reached high sensitivity (61.6%) and specicity (70.1%) values (Fig.3A). Using our new PCT cut-o of 1.52ng/dL, the false positive rate was 30.4% (patients with PCT value >1.52 ng/dL, but with negative hemoculture), while using the standard PCT cut-o 0.5 ng/dL, the false positive rate was 48.8%. Thus we obtain a reduction of risk of 18.4% to overestimate an infection status in this pattern of patients.

The following analysis showed that patients with a positive hemoculture mostly presented a Gram-negative bacteria infection (130 patients (72%)) and only 45 patients (24.8%) had a Gram-positive bacteria infection and only 6 patients (3.3%) showed a funginemia. By these results we tried to identify a more specic and sensitive

Patients

Number

Patients

(%)

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

3

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 2. Non parametric Mann-Whitney test results describing dierence between hemoculture positive vs. hemoculture negative population.

Figure 3. (A) ROC curve for various cut-o levels of PCT in dierentiating patients with positive and negative hemoculture; (B) ROC curve analysis of sensitivity and specicity for the Gram-negative bacteria patients group.

PCT value cut-o stratifying patients with positive hemoculture into Gram-negative and Gram-positive/fungi isolation: the ROC analysis demonstrates that the PCT cut-o point of 1.52 ng/mL for the Gram-negative bacteria isolations was associated to a sensitivity of 72.1% and specicity of 70.1%, reaching statistical signicance (AUC 0.77; P< 0.001) (Fig.3B). Conversely the PCT cut-o value of the group of patients with a Gram-positive/ fungi infection determined by the ROC analysis was 0.575 with a lower sensitivity (49.8%) and lower specicity (50.2%). These results were not statistical signicant (AUC 0.5; P< 0.082). Finally, calculation of the Chi-square test was used to value the reliability of both cut-os: 0.5 ng/dL e 1.52 ng/dL to discriminate true negatives and false negatives patients. We demonstrate that our new PCT cut-o of 1.52 ng/dL seems to be more reliable to identify the negativity of a hemoculture in this solid tumor oncologic population reaching statistical signicance (p=0.0247) (Fig.4).

Discussion

The close link between inammation and cancers has been noticed many years ago. Several chronic inammatory diseases play a role to promote the onset of a neoplasia such as the inammatory bowel disease and colon-rectal cancer, asbestosis and mesothelioma, hemochromatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma16,

Sjogrens syndrome and lymphoma17. On the other hand presence of tumor cells stimulates immune system inducing a permanent inflammatory status which supports cancer cells proliferation, dissemination, inhibition of apoptosis and neo-angiogenesis18. We focused our study on the peculiar inflammatory status of oncologic patients. In particular we hypothesize that the basal hyper-procalcitoninemia status in the solid tumor patients, especially during advanced stages of oncologic disease, could probably due to the progressive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines19. Bacteremia, which could represents an active infection condition, induces PCT increase. It could justifies why solid tumor patients could benefit from a highest PCT cut-off than non-oncologic patients and even more higher in case of

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

4

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 4. Chi-square statistic for the comparison of AUCs.

concomitant bacteremia. Our study confirms results of previous studies showing an higher sensitivity and specificity of PCT value in suggesting a Gram-negative infection rather than a Gram-positive infection20.

The dierent behavior of PCT in this context was established trough several in vitro studies where human cells were exposed to both Gram+ (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) and Gram- (muramyl dipeptide)21 bacterial-derived products. Thus, the LPS that is the major component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, promotes secretion of TNF-alpha which is in turn a powerful procalcitonin inductor. This procalcitonin stimulating mechanism does not occur through exposure of muramyl dipeptide, a cell wall component of Gram-positive bacteria22,23. The double inuence of both Gram-negative bacteremia and advanced cancer disease on PCT production, could probably inuence the PCT cut-o value increasing it until 1.52ng/dL. Low specicity and sensitivity of PCT value in patients with Gram-positive bacteremia conrms that procalcitonin levels depends on cytokines produced by host immune system in response to the infecting pathogen. In conclusion we support the clinic usefulness of serum procalcitonin dosage in febrile advanced solid tumor patients.

The retrospective nature of the study represent its major limit, hence further prospective study are mandatory to conrm that a PCT cut-o 1.52ng/dL could be helpful to identify a Gram-negative bacteremia in this specic population. Results from future prospective studies about this cut-o value might be used to help clinicians to decide a prompt start, a continuation or a discontinuance of antibiotic treatment. Finally this ndings could prevent unnecessary extensions of antibiotic therapies and patients hospitalization with a consequently undue delays of specic oncologic treatments.

References

1. Wingard, J. R. & Bowden, R. A. Management of Infection in Oncology Patients. Ch. 1822, 345430 (Martin Dunitz Taylor and Francis Group, 2003).

2. Zell, J. A. & Chang, J. C. Neoplastic fever: a neglected paraneoplastic syndrome. Support Care Cancer. 13(11), 870877 (2005).3. Browder, A.a., Hu, J.w. & Petersdorf, R.g. The signicance of fever in neoplastic disease. Ann Intern Med. 55, 932942 (1961).4. Tsalik, E. L., Jaggers, L. B., Glickman, S. W., Langley, R. J. & van Velkinburgh, J. C. et al. Discriminative value of inammatory biomarkers for suspected sepsis. J Emerg Med. 43(1), 97106 (2012).

5. Jullienne, A., Segond, N., Calmettes, C., Moukhtar, M. S. & Milhaud, G. Biosynthesis of human calcitonin: evidence for a prohormone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 95(3), 932937 (1980).

6. Christ-Crain, M. & Mller, B. Biomarkers in respiratory tract infections: diagnostic guides to antibiotic prescription, prognostic markers and mediators. Eur Respir J. 30(3), 556573 (2007).

7. Gilbert, D. N. Use of Plasma Procalcitonin Levels as an Adjunct to Clinical Microbiology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 48(7), 23252329 (2010).

8. Becker, K. L., Nyln, E. S., White, J. C., Mller, B. & Snider, R. H. Jr. Procalcitonin and the calcitonin gene family of peptides in inammation, infection, and sepsis: a journey from calcitonin back to its precursors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 89(4), 15121525 (2004).

9. Reinhart, K. & Meisner, M. Biomarkers in the critically ill patient: procalcitonin. Crit Care Clin. 27(2), 253263 (2011).

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

5

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

10. Sakr, Y., Sponholz, C., Tuche, F., Brunkhorst, F. & Reinhart, K. The role of procalcitonin in febrile neutropenic patients: review of the literature. Infection. 36(5), 396407 (2008).

11. Ito, S., Sato, N., Kojika, M., Yaegashi, Y. & Suzuki, Y. et al. Serum procalcitonin levels are elevated in esophageal cancer patients with postoperative infectious complications. Eur Surg Res. 37(1), 2228 (2005).

12. Shomali, W., Hachem, R., Chaari, A. M., Jiang, Y. & Bahu, R. et al. Can procalcitonin distinguish infectious fever from tumor-related fever in non-neutropenic cancer patients? Cancer. 118(23), 58235829 (2012).

13. Schuetz, P., Albrich, W. & Mueller B. Procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection and guide to antibiotic decisions: past, present and future. BMC Med. 9, 107 (2011).

14. Pvoa, P., Souza-Dantas, V. C., Soares, M. & Salluh, J. F. C-reactive protein in critically ill cancer patients with sepsis: inuence of neutropenia. Crit Care. 15(3), R129 (2011).

15. Angeletti, S., Battistoni, F., Fioravanti, M., Bernardini, S. & Dicuonzo, G. Procalcitonin and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin test combination in sepsis diagnosis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 51(5), 10591067 (2013).

16. Ismail, F., Mahmoud, A., Abdelhaleem, H., Mamdoh, A. & Geneidy, M. et al. Primary Sjgrens syndrome and B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma: role of CD4+ T lymphocytopenia. Rheumatol Int. 33(4), 10211025 (2013).

17. Hussain, S. P. & Harris, C. C. Inammation and cancer: an ancient link with novel potentials. Int J Cancer. 121(11), 23732380 (2007).

18. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 13, 646674 (2011).19. McDonald, N. Cancer cachexia and targeting chronic inflammation: a unified approach to cancer treatment and palliative/ supportive care. Supportive oncology. 13(4), 157162 (2007).

20. Charles, P. E., Ladoire, S., Aho, S., Quenot, J. P. & Doise, J. M. et al. Serum procalcitonin elevation in critically Ill patients at the onset of bacteremia caused by either gram negative or gram positive bacteria. BMC Infectious Diseases. 8, 38 (2008).

21. Tavares, E., Maldonado, R., Ojeda, M. L. & Miano, F. J. Circulating inammatory mediators during start of fever in dierential diagnosis of gram-negative and gram-positive infections in leukopenic rats. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 12, 10851093 (2005).

22. Skerrett, S. J., Liggitt, H. D., Hajjar, A. M. & Wilson, C. B. Cutting edge: Myeloid dierentiation factor 88 is essential for pulmonary host defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa but not Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol. 172, 33773381 (2004).

23. Karlsson, H., Larsson, P., Wold, A. E. & Rudin, A. Pattern of cytokine responses to gram-positive and gram-negative commensal bacteria is profoundly changed when monocytes dierentiate into dendritic cells. Infect Immun. 72, 26712678 (2004).

Author Contributions

B.V. and I.F. make substantial contributions to conception and design of the study; S.A. and G.D. performed the analysis and collected the data; B.V. and F.P. perform statistical analysis; B.V., I.F., F.P. and A.Z. participate in draing the article and interpreting data; G.D., S.A., D.S. and G.T. revising critically the article content. All authors give nal approval to the nal manuscript version.

Additional Information

Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.

How to cite this article: Vincenzi, B. et al. Procalcitonin as diagnostic marker of infection in solid tumors patients with fever. Sci. Rep. 6, 28090; doi: 10.1038/srep28090 (2016).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

6