Alpha-2A Adrenoceptor Agonist Guanfacine Restores Diuretic Efficiency in Experimental Cirrhotic Ascites: Comparison with Clonidine

Abstract

Background

In human cirrhosis, adrenergic hyperfunction causes proximal tubular fluid retention and contributes to diuretic-resistant ascites, and clonidine, a sympatholytic drug, improves natriuresis in difficult-to-treat ascites.

Aim

To compare clonidine (aspecific α₂-adrenoceptor agonist) to SSP-002021R (prodrug of guanfacine, specific α_2A-receptor agonist), both associated with diuretics, in experimental cirrhotic ascites.

Methods and Results

Six groups of 12 rats were studied: controls (G1); controls receiving furosemide and potassium canrenoate (G2); rats with ascitic cirrhosis due to 14-week CCl₄ treatment (G3); cirrhotic rats treated (over the 11^th-14^th CCl₄ weeks) with furosemide and canrenoate (G4), furosemide, canrenoate and clonidine (G5), or diuretics and SSP002021R (G6). Three rats of each group had their hormonal status and renal function assessed at the end of 11^th, 12^th, 13^th, and 14^th weeks of respective treatments.Cirrhotic rats in G3 and G4 gained weight over the 12^th-14^th CCl₄ weeks. In G4, brief increase in sodium excretion over the 11^th-12^th weeks preceded worsening of inulin clearance and natriuresis (diuretic resistance). In comparison with G4, the addition of clonidine (G5) or guanfacine (G6) to diuretics improved, respectively, sodium excretion over the 11^th-12^th CCl₄ weeks, or GFR and electrolytes excretion over the 13^th-14^th CCl₄ weeks. Natriuretic responses in G5 and G6 were accompanied by reduced catecholamine serum levels.

Conclusions

α_2A-receptor agonists restore glomerular filtration rate and natriuresis, and delay diuretic-resistant ascites in experimental advanced cirrhosis. Clonidine ameliorates diuretic-dependent natriuresis just for a short time.

About the Authors:

Giovanni Sansoè

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Gradenigo Hospital, Torino, Italy

Manuela Aragno

Affiliation: Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Raffaella Mastrocola

Affiliation: Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Giulio Mengozzi

Affiliation: Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Torino, Italy

Maurizio Parola

Affiliation: Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Introduction

Refractory ascites, which occurs in most cirrhotic patients with end-stage liver disease and avid sodium retention, comprises diuretic-intractable and diuretic-resistant ascites [1]. In order to treat the latter, which is genuinely unresponsive to the use of diuretics, several therapies have been tested, including repeated paracentesis with intravenous albumin, peritoneal venous shunt, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), but none of these procedures was found to improve survival in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis [2, 3]. TIPS may even precipitate hepatic failure and worsen survival rate in patients with high Child-Pugh score [4].

The mechanisms of diuretic-resistant ascites, whose essential clinical features are progressive increase in body weight and decrease in natriuresis despite doses of diuretics that were previously achieving a diuresis, are manifold: peripheral arterial vasodilatation, portal hypertension, reduction of the effective arterial blood volume, and permanent activation of endogenous anti-natriuretic and renal vasoconstrictor mechanisms (renin-angiotensin [RAS] and sympathetic nervous [SNS] systems, non-osmotic hypersecretion of vasopressin [ADH]) [5, 6]. Diuretic-resistant ascites occurs as a result of extreme vascular underfilling with maximal activation of these anti-natriuretic systems [1]. Specifically, the activated SNS and RAS stimulate kidney arterial vasoconstriction, which eventually leads to decrease in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. Additionally, norepinephrine and angiotensin II increase reabsorption of sodium in the proximal renal tubule, which leads to negligible response to diuretics and to enhanced secretion of renin [7].

In patients with cirrhosis and diuretic-resistant ascites, clonidine, an α₂-adrenoceptor agonist that decreases central sympathetic outflow, release of norepinephrine from vascular neuroeffector junctions [8] and portal pressure [9], has been tried as adjunct to common diuretics with promising results. Clonidine, associated with the α₁-adrenoceptor agonist midodrine and standard medical therapy (SMT), was superior to SMT alone in the control of ascites in cirrhotic patients [10]. Moreover, clonidine improved the effects of diuretics (spironolactone alone or the combination of furosemide and spironolactone) in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and ascites [11, 12].

Clonidine’s binding affinity does not differ appreciably among the many α₂-receptors so far described. Indeed, five α₂-receptors subtypes exist: α_2A, α_2B1, α_2B2, α_2C, and α_2D, which belong to the group A of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor class [13]. Clonidine systemic effects do not depend preferentially on stimulation of α₂-receptors that are pre- or post-junctional (i.e. pre- or post-synaptic), located either in the central nervous system, in the wall of peripheral blood vessels, or in the kidney [13, 14].

The similar affinity of clonidine for this multitude of α₂-adrenoceptors is a manifest drawback and may render the results of clonidine itself sub-optimal in the treatment of the ascitic patients that are ill-responsive to diuretics. Indeed, clonidine, through stimulation of endothelial α_2D-receptors, may enhance vascular production of nitric oxide (NO), leading to arterial vasodilatation, hypotension [14] and worsening of the hyperdynamic circulation of cirrhotic patients. Furthermore, enhanced NO synthesis increases the expression of apical Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl^- cotransporters in the loop of Henle, and therefore renal sodium retention [15]. Finally, stimulation of α_2B-adrenoceptors, located in the basolateral membrane of the proximal renal tubule [16], leads to accelerated sodium reabsorption even in this nephron segment [16, 17].

Guanfacine, a different α₂-adrenoceptor agonist, has approximately 60-fold more selectivity for α_2A-receptors than clonidine [18] and does not lower arterial blood pressure significantly in patients with arterial hypertension [19]. Guanfacine, through specific stimulation of renal α_2A-adrenoceptors, increases osmolar clearance and sodium excretion in a peculiar naltrexone (opioid receptor antagonist)-sensitive manner, according to the established natriuretic function of renal α_2A-adrenoceptors [18]. The rat kidney contains α_2A-receptors, which are located in the inner stripe of the renal cortex and in the outer medulla [16, 20, 21], where stimulation of these post-synaptic receptors antagonizes the antidiuretic effects of ADH [22]. Indeed, guanfacine leads to significant aquaretic effects even in experimental ascitic cirrhosis [23]. For these reasons, guanfacine may represent a much better candidate drug, among α₂-receptor agonists, than clonidine in order to blunt adrenergic hyperfunction and restore diuretic efficiency in advanced cirrhotic ascites.

With this premise in mind, the present study has been designed to achieve two major aims: a) to characterize, in terms of renal function and hormonal status, the occurrence and identify the timing of unresponsiveness to traditional diuretic therapy in the experimental model of rats with advanced carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)-dependent cirrhosis; b) to investigate in such a stage of experimental decompensated cirrhosis the hypothesized advantage of guanfacine over clonidine, when these drugs are added to diuretics in order to restore their natriuretic efficiency.

Materials and Methods

Studies were performed on 48 male adult Wistar rats with advanced liver cirrhosis and 24 male adult Wistar control rats. All Wistar rats were provided by Harlan Italy, Udine, Italy. Both cirrhotic and control groups were fed with standardized chow and water. Cirrhosis was induced by CCl₄ (Riedel-de Haën, Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany) administered by gavage twice weekly for 14 weeks [24]. The pathophysiological progression of this experimental model is highly predictable and reproducible: after 9 weeks, micronodular cirrhosis is evident, rats are devoid of ascites (as assessed by laparotomy) and portal pressure is increased to about 10 mmHg; after 11 weeks, rats present ascites and their mean portal pressure is 24 mmHg; after 14 weeks cirrhotic rats develop renal failure and eventually die [25, 26]. Control rats were studied after 14 weeks of standardized diet. Rats were cared for in compliance with the European Council directives (No. 86/609/EEC) and with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH no. 85–23, revised in 1985). This scientific project was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Torino (permit number: D.M. 92/2010-B). In this study, the following active drugs were administered to the rats according to the protocol described in the next paragraphs: furosemide, Henle’s loop diuretic (Sanofi-Aventis, Milano, Italy); potassium canrenoate, aldosterone receptor antagonist (Teofarma, Pavia, Italy); clonidine, α₂-adrenoceptor agonist (Boehringer Ingelheim, Milano, Italy). Finally, SSP-002021R, oral prodrug of guanfacine, selective α_2A-adrenoceptor agonist, was provided by Shire, Basingstoke, U.K.

Animal groups

Furosemide, canrenoate, clonidine, and SSP-002021R were dissolved in distilled water to obtain different solutions to be administered orally to the rats in 400 μl of fluid. The animals were divided into six groups of twelve rats: controls receiving no intervention (group G1); controls receiving three times a week for 4 weeks oral furosemide (0.5 mg/Kg b.w.) and oral potassium canrenoate (2 mg/Kg b.w.) (G2); rats with ascitic cirrhosis due to 14-week CCl₄ administration and receiving no active drug (G3); cirrhotic rats treated with oral furosemide (0.5 mg/Kg b.w. three times a week) plus oral potassium canrenoate (2 mg/Kg b.w. three times a week) between the beginning of the 11^th and the end of the 14^th week of CCl₄ (G4); cirrhotic rats treated with oral furosemide, oral potassium canrenoate (see above dosage), and oral clonidine (0.3 mcg three times a week) between the beginning of the 11^th and the end of the 14^th week of CCl₄ (G5); cirrhotic rats treated with oral furosemide, oral canrenoate, and the oral prodrug of guanfacine (SSP002021R, selective α_2A-adrenoceptor agonist, 5 mg/kg b.w. three times a week) between the beginning of the 11^th and the end of the 14^th week of CCl₄ (G6). Dosage of furosemide and potassium canrenoate was patterned on respective standard daily human dosage. A dosage of clonidine 0.3 mcg on alternate days was chosen: previous experiments in this laboratory showed clonidine 0.5 mcg caused arterial hypotension in cirrhotic rats and blunted further the effects of diuretics (unpublished data), and published papers showed the effectiveness of low, non-hypotensive doses of clonidine (75 mcg once or twice daily in adult human cirrhotic patients) [10–12]. The dosage of SSP002021R used in this study was established by the provider of the drug (Shire, Basingstoke, U.K.)

Study protocol

Rats belonging to G1–G6 were weighed, studied and finally sacrificed, three at a time, at the end of weeks 11, 12, 13, and 14 of observation or CCl₄ administration, with or without the above active treatments. All rats treated with active drugs were studied within 8 hours after the latest drug administration. Each day of study, rats were anesthetized with a mixture of Ketavet 100 (Farmaceutici Gellini, Sabaudia, Italy) and Rompum (Xylazine, Bayer A.G., Leverkusen, Germany) (4:1 v:v) by intraperitoneal injection (0.5 ml mixture/200 g b. wt.) [27]; laparotomy was performed and the urinary bladder was emptied before clamping the urethral orifice for further urine collection. Shortly thereafter, inulin (IN) 10% (w/v) (Laevosan-Gesellschaft, Linz/Donau, Austria) plus para-aminohippurate (PAH) 20% (w/v) (Nephrotest, BAG Gmbh, Munich, Germany) were administered into the caudal vein as a priming bolus followed by a continuous infusion, in order to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) by means of their respective steady-state plasma clearances (CIN and CPAH) [28, 29]. When 90 minutes of IN and PAH infusion had elapsed (i.e. once their steady-state plasma concentrations had been reached), cardiac blood was sampled to assess plasma osmolality and concentrations of inulin, PAH, sodium, and potassium. Blood samples withdrawn at this time were also used to measure plasma renin activity (PRA) and concentrations of vasopressin (ADH), aldosterone (A), epinephrine (E), and norepinephrine (N). Finally, urinary bladder was emptied to collect the urine volume produced during the 90 min of IN and PAH venous infusion. This urine was used to determine its osmolality and the excretion of sodium and potassium. Rats were then killed by exsanguination through the aorta. Anesthetized rats in each group had their mean arterial pressure evaluated through tail sphygmomanometry, as described elsewhere [25], before performing laparotomy.

Plasma and urine analyses

Plasma and urinary concentrations of electrolytes and IN and PAH plasma concentrations were measured as described elsewhere [26, 30, 31]. Plasma A, ADH, N, E, and PRA were determined according to standard procedures [25, 32].

Calculations

Sodium and potassium clearances (CNa and CK) were calculated through the usual formula [32]. Inulin clearance (CIN) and para-aminohippurate clearance (CPAH) were calculated through the steady-state plasma clearance formula as:where ssP-x is the steady-state plasma concentration of x. CIN and CPAH were taken as measures of GFR and RPF, respectively [28, 29]. Filtration fraction (FF) and filtered sodium load (FlNa) were calculated through the usual formulae [32].

Fractional sodium excretion (FENa) and fractional potassium excretion (FEK) were also calculated [27].

Tubular free-water reabsorption (TF-WR) was calculated, following Rose and Post [33], through the formula:where V is the urinary output (ml/min) and Cosm is the osmolar clearance, which was computed via the usual formula:where Uosm and Posm are urine and plasma osmolarities, respectively.

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated from the formula:

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons of renal function or hormone levels in rats belonging to different G1–G6 groups, performed after definite times of exposure to CCl₄, were made by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s LSD post-hoc comparisons. Comparisons among rats belonging to the same group, but studied at different times (i.e. measurements of mean ± SD of weeks 11–12 vs. weeks 13–14 of observation or CCl4) were made through one-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test for unpaired data. All results are expressed as means ± SD. Significance is accepted at the 5% probability level.

Results

Identification of unresponsiveness to diuretics in rats with experimental ascitic cirrhosis

Normal rats (G2) had a progressive increase in urine volume and sodium excretion without derangement of renal function over the four weeks of diuretic treatment (Table 1). The body weight of G3 and G4 cirrhotic rats increased progressively over the 12th-14th weeks of CCl₄ due to ascites accumulation, irrespective of standard dosage of diuretics in G4 (Table 1, Fig 1). From the end of week 12 onwards, in G4 the occurrence of unresponsiveness to diuretics was characterized by values of GFR, renal plasma flow, sodium excretion even lower (Table 1), and systemic catecholamine levels even higher than in cirrhotic rats not treated with diuretics (G3) (Figs 2 and 3). This means that overt diuretic-resistant ascites in this model of advanced cirrhosis occurs at the end of 12 weeks of CCl₄.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Renal function.

Comparisons between means ± SD of GFR, RPF, urine volume, urine sodium excretion rate, etc. taken on weeks 11–12 (Group GX_A) vs. weeks 13–14 (Group GX_B) or among different G1–G6 groups. In each group, worsening of clinical parameters underlined, improvements in bold print (weeks 13–14, Group GX_B, vs. weeks 11–12, Group GX_A).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486.t001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Progressive weight gain of untreated cirrhotic rats (G3, red line) and of cirrhotic rats treated with diuretics (G4, yellow line) or with diuretics plus clonidine (G5, blue line).

Further groups depicted: G1 (healthy controls, black line), G6 (cirrhotic rats treated with diuretics plus oral prodrug of guanfacine, green line). Mean measurements ± SD of three rats studied at a time in each group are depicted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Transient natriuretic effects in G4 (cirrhotic rats treated with furosemide and potassium canrenoate, yellow line) and G5 (cirrhotic rats treated with diuretics plus clonidine, blue line) over CCl₄ weeks 11–12.

Progressive natriuretic effects in G6 (cirrhotic rats treated with diuretics plus oral prodrug of guanfacine, green line). Further groups depicted: G1 (healthy controls, black line), G3 (untreated cirrhotic rats, red line). Mean measurements ± SD of three rats studied at a time in each group are depicted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Graphical depiction of adrenergic hypertone in cirrhotic rats, treated (G4) or not (G3) with diuretics.

Early (G5) and late (G6) blunting of adrenergic function in cirrhotic rats receiving, respectively, clonidine or guanfacine, along with diuretics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486.g003

Renal function

In cirrhotic rats, the favourable effects of clonidine, when added to furosemide and canrenoate (G5), was prompt and resulted in an increase in urine flow rate and sodium excretion that paralleled and expanded the slight one due to diuretics only in G4 (Table 1, Fig 2). Nonetheless, the advantage of treatment with clonidine was also transient and followed by accelerated derangement of renal function over weeks 13–14 (Tables 1 and 2; Fig 2). Guanfacine was slower that clonidine in achieving an increase in diuresis and natriuresis, but its effects were progressive and significant mostly on weeks 13–14 of CCl₄ (Table 1, Fig 2). Actually, guanfacine, added to diuretics, caused a progressive improvement in renal function (GFR and RPF) over the four weeks of observation (weeks 11–14) (Table 1). Guanfacine, when added to the traditional diuretic treatment of ascites over weeks 11–14, caused a steady and progressive increase in urinary potassium excretion rate (Table 2). Guanfacine, at the used dosage and associated with diuretics, did not affect significantly tubular free-water reabsorption. Notably, in cirrhotic rats treated with diuretics alone (G4) or with diuretics plus clonidine (G5), severe GFR deterioration occurred during the 13^th and 14^th weeks of CCl₄ (Table 1). In these two groups, which had their sodium excretion rates transiently increased over the first two weeks of respective treatment, different mechanisms might have led to similar anti-natriuretic effects in the long run: clonidine promptly increases GFR and natriuresis (Table 1 and Fig 2), which are then followed by later deterioration of renal function; diuretics cause an immediate tubular diuretic effect that leads to decrease in effective arterial blood volume and earlier deterioration of GFR due to urinary fluid loss not counterbalanced by any sympatholytic action (Tables 1 and 3; Figs 2 and 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Renal function.

Comparisons between means ± SD of FENa, kaliuresis, plasma Na, etc. taken on weeks 11–12 (Group GX_A) vs. weeks 13–14 (Group GX_B) or among different G1–G6 groups. In each group, worsening of clinical parameters underlined, improvements in bold print (weeks 13–14, Group GX_B, vs. weeks 11–12, Group GX_A).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486.t002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Hormonal status.

Comparisons between means ± SD of PRA, plasma aldosterone, etc. taken on weeks 11–12 (Group GX_A) vs. weeks 13–14 (Group GX_B) or among different G1–G6 groups. In each group, worsening of clinical parameters underlined, improvements in bold print (weeks 13–14, Group GX_B, vs. weeks 11–12, Group GX_A).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486.t003

Hormonal status (Table 3)

α₂-adrenergic agonists blunted the adrenergic hyperfunction that characterizes advanced liver cirrhosis, as shown by reduced levels of serum norepinephrine in ascitic cirrhotic rats treated with clonidine (G5) or guanfacine (G6) plus diuretics compared to cirrhotic rats untreated (G3) or treated with sole diuretics (G4). When the behaviour of epinephrine serum levels is considered (Fig 3), blunting of adrenergic function was early and transient with clonidine and, instead, progressive and long-lasting with guanfacine. The effect of guanfacine on adrenergic function contributes to the increased natriuretic effects and the amelioration of GFR described previously. In the advanced stage of liver disease, cirrhotic rats (G3) showed a progressive and severe hyper-reninism (i.e. secondary aldosteronism), which was maximal during overt refractory ascites (i.e. on CCl₄ weeks 13 and 14) (Fig 4). As expected, even this phenomenon was positively affected by the blunting of adrenergic function caused by α₂-agonists (Fig 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. Marked increase in PRA (concurrent with development of diuretic-unresponsive ascites) over CCL₄ weeks 13–14 in cirrhotic rats (G3, untreated, red line, and G4, receiving diuretics only, yellow line).

Blunting of renin secretion in G5 (cirrhotic rats treated with diuretics plus clonidine, blue line) and G6 (cirrhotic rats treated with diuretics plus oral prodrug of guanfacine, green line). Further group depicted: G1 (untreated controls, black line). Mean measurements ± SD of three rats studied at a time in each group are depicted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486.g004

Mean arterial pressure

When compared to absolute controls (G1), significantly lower values of MAP were measured in the cirrhotic group treated with sole diuretics (G4) over CCl₄ weeks 12–14 (all P<0.05) (data not shown in tables).

Discussion

This study identifies the timing of overt unresponsiveness to diuretics in the standard model of experimental ascitic cirrhosis due to chronic CCl₄ administration [34]. This unresponsiveness to diuretics occurs at the end of 12 weeks of CCl₄, when two weeks of successful treatment with furosemide and potassium canrenoate have elapsed.

Our assertion of the occurrence of such a resistance to diuretics is not, and could not be, based on the accepted definition of refractory ascites, as this is diagnosed in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis [35]. In our cirrhotic rats diuretic-unresponsive ascites occurs after 12 weeks of CCl₄ because of the manifest lack of effects of traditional diuretics—effects we accurately measured once a week and not daily—and because of the progressive weight gain despite the diuretics (Table 1 and Figs 1 and 2). Diuretic-resistant ascites is preceded by significant diuretic responses to the association of furosemide and anti-aldosterone drugs, and by increased adrenergic function and secondary aldosteronism during such a diuretic response (Tables 1 and 3, Figs 2, 3 and 4). Harbinger of diuretic-resistant ascites, which occurs over weeks 13–14 of CCl₄, i.e. after two weeks of diuretics, is a further increase in secondary aldosteronism, representing a critical loss of effective arterial blood volume (Fig 4). This closely mimics the occurrence of human diuretic-resistant ascites previously responsive to diuretics. Of course, since we were not interested in the diagnosis of diuretic-intractable ascites in our experimental model, we did not monitor the extra-renal side effects of diuretics (e.g. possible signs of hepatic encephalopathy) that characterize diuretic-intractable ascites in cirrhotic patients [35].

Guanfacine, selective α_2A-adrenoceptor agonist, when added to the traditional diuretic treatment of ascites, apparently prevents the occurrence of diuretic-resistant ascites, at least over the length of our study (i.e. 14 weeks of CCl₄) (Fig 2). On the contrary, clonidine, aspecific α₂-adrenoceptor agonist and sympatholytic agent, just amplifies the diuretic effects of furosemide and potassium canrenoate in the weeks before the occurrence of diuretic resistance (Fig 2).

Notably, guanfacine, a sympatholytic agent itself, in our cirrhotic rats caused a later attenuation of catecholamine release, as assessed by the serial measurement of epinephrine and norepinephrine plasma levels (Table 3, Fig 3). This is associated with blunting of renin production (Fig 4) and progressive recovery of GFR over CCl₄ weeks 13–14 (Table 1) These hormonal and renal effects are accompanied by progressive increase in urinary excretions of sodium and potassium, which are maximal after 4 weeks of guanfacine (i.e. on CCl₄ week 14) (Tables 1, 2 and Fig 2). The concurrent increase in urinary excretion of sodium and potassium (Tables 1 and 2) may suggest some guanfacine-dependent increase in delivery of tubular fluid to the loop of Henle, where furosemide exerts its natriuretic and kaliuretic action.

The natriuretic effect of clonidine, as adjunct to diuretics, is maximal during CCl₄ weeks 11 and 12, is accompanied by transient improvement of renal function and decrease in catecholamine release, but is followed by severe deterioration of GFR over the following weeks of treatment (Tables 1 and 3; Figs 2 and 3). This is different from the ephemeral increase in urine flow and sodium excretion rate due to diuretics only, which apparently prompts early and uncontrolled stimulation of adrenergic function and secondary aldosteronism (Tables 1 and 3; Figs 3 and 4).

Clonidine’s and guanfacine’s beneficial effects, transient the former and later the latter, may have the following reasons. First, clonidine exerts its adrenolytic effects earlier than the oral prodrug of guanfacine (Table 3, Fig 3) because of the need of metabolic activation of the latter, metabolic activation that might be slowed down in a setting of liver failure. Second, aspecific α_2-adrenergic stimulation by clonidine may elicit some potential anti-natriuretic forces that are the consequence of stimulation of NO synthesis [14–17]. Third and last, it was demonstrated that α_2A-receptor stimulation (by guanfacine or analogues) leads to direct tubular diuretic effects [18].

So far, only clonidine has been tested in order to ameliorate the effects of diuretics in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites. And these attempts were successful [10– 12]. It is conceivable that, in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, as well as in our model of experimental ascites, beneficial diuretic effects of clonidine might be short-lived. And, in this probable case, oral prodrug of guanfacine would be worth being tried instead of clonidine, once suitable guanfacine’s dosage and schedule is clearly established in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

In conclusion, this study represents the first successful use of α_2A-adrenoceptor agonists in order to increase the diuretic effects of furosemide and anti-aldosterone drugs in the setting of experimental advanced cirrhosis with ascites. No previous clinical or experimental study has ever been performed with this aim. Moreover, we described a suitable experimental model of diuretic-resistant ascites in cirrhotic rats. This model may be useful for further pathophysiological or pharmacological studies. Future efforts to arrange dosage and administration schedule of oral prodrugs of guanfacine for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with ascites seem now worthwhile.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GS MA MP. Performed the experiments: RM GM. Analyzed the data: GS MA RM GM MP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RM GM. Wrote the paper: GS MA RM GM MP.

Citation: Sansoè G, Aragno M, Mastrocola R, Mengozzi G, Parola M (2016) Alpha-2A Adrenoceptor Agonist Guanfacine Restores Diuretic Efficiency in Experimental Cirrhotic Ascites: Comparison with Clonidine. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0158486. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158486

References

1. Arroyo V, Ginès P, Gerbes AL, Dudley FJ, Gentilini P, Laffi G, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2011; 23: 164–76.

2. Ginès P, Arroyo V, Vargas V, Planas R, Casafont F, Panès J, et al. Paracentesis with intravenous infusion of albumin as compared with peritoneovenous shunting in cirrhosis with refractory ascites. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 829–35. pmid:1875966

3. Cardenas A, Ginès P. Management of patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. Gut. 2011; 60: 412–21. pmid:21193458

4. Boyer T. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: current status. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124: 1700–10. pmid:12761727

5. Bekheirnia MR, Schrier RW. Pathophysiology of water and sodium retention: edematous states with normal kidney function. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006; 6: 202–7. pmid:16483846

6. Schrier RW, Gurevich AK, Cadnapaphornchai MA. Pathogenesis and management of sodium and water retention in cardiac failure and cirrhosis. Semin Nephrol. 2001; 21: 157–72. pmid:11245778

7. Henriksen JH, Ring-Larsen H. Hepatorenal disorders: role of the sympathetic nervous system. Semin Liver Dis. 1994; 14: 35–43. pmid:8016660

8. Goldstein DS, Levinson PD, Zimlichman R, Pitterman A, Stull R, Keiser HL, et al. Clonidine suppression testing in essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102: 42–9. pmid:3966744

9. Esler M, Dudley F, Jennings G, Debinski H, Lambert G, Jones P, et al. Increased sympathetic nervous activity and the effects of its inhibition with clonidine in alcoholic cirrhosis. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116: 446–55. pmid:1739234

10. Singh V, Singh A, Singh B, Vijayvergiya R, Sharma N, Ghai A, et al. Midodrine and clonidine in patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites: a randomized pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108: 560–7. pmid:23419385

11. Lenaerts A, Codden T, Meunier JC, Henry JP, Ligny G. Effects of clonidine on diuretic response in ascitic patients with cirrhosis and activation of sympathetic nervous system, Hepatology. 2006; 44: 844–9. pmid:17006921

12. Yang YY, Lin HC, Lee WP, Chu CJ, Lin MW, Lee FY, et al. Association of the G-protein and α2-adrenergic receptor gene and plasma norepinephrine level with clonidine improvement of the effects of diuretics in patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites: a randomised clinical trial. Gut. 2010; 59: 1545–53. pmid:20833658

13. Fairbanks CA, Stone LS, Wilcox GL. Pharmacological profiles of Alpha 2 adrenergic receptor agonists identified using genetically altered mice and isobolographic analysis. Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 123: 224–38. pmid:19393691

14. Figueroa XF, Poblete MI, Boric MP, Mendizabal VE, Adler-Graschinsky E, Huidobro-Toro JP, et al. Clonidine-induced nitric oxide-dependent vasorelaxation mediated by endothelial α2-adrenoceptor activation. Br J Pharmacol. 2001; 134: 957–68. pmid:11682443

15. Turban S, Wang XY, Knepper MA. Regulation of NHE3, NKCC2, and NCC abundance in kidney during aldosterone escape phenomenon: role of NO. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003; 285: F843–51. pmid:12837683

16. Huang L, Wei YY, Momose-Hotokezaka A, Dickey J, Okusa MD. Alpha 2B-adrenergic receptors: immunolocalization and regulation by potassium depletion in rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: F1015–26. pmid:8764321

17. Link RE, Desai K, Hein L, Stevens ME, Chruscinski A, Bernstein D, et al. Cardiovascular regulation in mice lacking alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtypes b and c. Science. 1996; 273: 803–5. pmid:8670422

18. Intengan HD, Smyth DD. Alpha-2a/d adrenoceptor subtype stimulation by guanfacine increases osmolar clearance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997; 281: 48–53. pmid:9103479

19. Bakris GL, Lindholm LH, Black HR, Krum H, Linas S, Linseman JV, et al. Divergent results using clinic and ambulatory blood pressures: report of a darusentan-resistant hypertension trial. Hypertension. 2010; 56: 824–30. pmid:20921430

20. Uhlen S, Wikberg JES. Delineation of three pharmacological subtypes of α2-adrenoceptors in the rat kidney. Br J Pharmacol. 1991; 104: 657–64. pmid:1665747

21. Saiz J, Pazos A, del Olmo E, Saiz V, Sanchez A. Yohimbine-induced alterations in α2-adrenoceptors in kidney regions of the spontaneously hypertensive rats: an autoradiographic analysis. Pharmacol Rep. 2008; 60: 391–8. pmid:18622064

22. Smyth DD, Umemura S, Pettinger WA. Alpha-adrenoceptor antagonism of vasopressin-induced changes in sodium excretion. Am J Physiol. 1985; 248: F767–72. pmid:2988346

23. Sansoè G, Aragno M, Mastrocola R, Parola M. Pathogenesis of Solute-Free Water Retention in Experimental Ascitic Cirrhosis: Is Vasopressin the Only Culprit? Clin Sci. 2016; 130: 117–24. pmid:26519424

24. Proctor E, Chatamra K. High yield micronodular cirrhosis in the rat. Gastroenterology. 1982; 83: 1183–90. pmid:7129027

25. Sansoè G, Aragno M, Mastrocola R, Restivo F, Mengozzi G, Smedile A, et al. Neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) in cirrhotic liver: a new target to treat portal hypertension? J Hepatol. 2005; 43: 791–8. pmid:16085334

26. Sansoè G, Aragno M, Mastrocola R, Cutrìn JC, Silvano S, Mengozzi G, et al. Overexpression of kidney neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) and renal function in experimental cirrhosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006; 290: F1337–43. pmid:16449355

27. Sansoè G, Aragno M, Tomasinelli CE, Valfrè di Bonzo L, Wong F, Parola M. Calcium-dependent diuretic system in preascitic liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010; 53: 856–62. pmid:20739082

28. Cole BR, Giangiacomo J, Ingelfinger JR, Robson AM. Measurement of renal function without urine collection. A critical evaluation of the constant-infusion technique for determination of inulin and para-aminohippurate. N Engl J Med. 1972; 287: 1109–14. pmid:5082190

29. Schnurr E, Lahme W, Kuppers H. Measurement of renal clearance of inulin and PAH in the steady state without urine collection. Clin Nephrol. 1980; 13: 26–9. pmid:7363512

30. Sansoè G, Silvano S, Rosina F, Smedile A, Rizzetto M. Evidence of a dynamic aldosterone-independent distal tubular control of renal sodium excretion in compensated liver cirrhosis. J Intern Med. 2005; 257: 358–66. pmid:15788006

31. Sansoè G, Silvano S, Mengozzi G, Todros L, Smedile A, Touscoz G, et al. Inappropriately low angiotensin II generation: a factor determining reduced kidney function and survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2004; 40: 417–23. pmid:15123355

32. Sansoè G, Wong F. Natriuretic and aquaretic effects of intravenously infused calcium in preascitic human cirrhosis: physiopathological and clinical implications. Gut. 2007; 56: 1117–23. pmid:17303596

33. Rose BD, Post TW. Clinical physiology of acid-base and electrolyte disorders, 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill. 2001, pp. 285–98.

34. Ginès P, Berl T, Bernardi M, Bichet DG, Hamon G, Jimènez W, et al. Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: from pathogenesis to treatment. Hepatology. 1998, 28: 851–64. pmid:9731583

35. Ginès P, Cardenas A, Arroyo V, Rodés J. Management of cirrhosis and ascites. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1646–54. pmid:15084697