specifically, 2q33[48] (CYP27A1), 12q13[36] (CYP27B1 and VDR), and 20q13[36] (CYP24A1).
The CYP24A1 SNPs significantly associated with neovascular AMD in the discovery cohort (either individually [rs6127118 and rs2769234] or as part of a haplotype [rs6068816, rs6127118, rs1570699, rs92760 and rs2762934]) were concentrated in the area between exon 6 and exon 12. This area was further examined and refined by direct sequencing and analysed in an extended sibling cohort. After controlling for smoking history, sex and age, we were able to show significant variation in CYP24A1 in all populations, both separately and, more importantly, in a meta-analysis. Variation within CYP24A1 was available in the dbGAP dataset http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/ but, when tested for association with AMD, no significance was observed. This lack of association could be explained by the small number of subjects in the dbGAP dataset, as compared with the current study (n = 500 and 2,528, respectively). Additionally, these data were based on a 100,000 SNP chip, and the CYP24A1 variation was imputed with low imputation quality, which is another limitation of the dbGAP dataset.
Moreover, pathway analysis showed that, in a hypothetical pathway, CYP24A1 was directly linked to another AMD-associated gene, HTRA1, for which the exact pathway is unknown. In a complex disease such as AMD, one would expect the combination of multiple effects, including the modest effect of CYP24A1, to contribute to disease causality. Although there was no statistical interaction seen between CYP24A1 and HTRA1, there may have been binding between the two that differed between those with and those without AMD. Further molecular studies should be performed to investigate this association.
An anti-angiogenic role for vitamin D has been well documented in the cancer literature [96-98]. Therefore, a role for vitamin D may be protective of AMD by its anti-angiogenic properties [27]. For example, VEGF expression was downregulated after tumour cells were treated with vitamin D [25, 26]. Vitamin D may exert anti-inflammatory properties by enhancing T suppressor cell activity and down-regulating T helper cells, T cytotoxic cells and natural killer cells [28]. At physiological concentrations, vitamin D has also been shown to protect cell proteins and membranes from oxidative damage [30]. In addition to playing a role in cancer, the vitamin D pathway has been implicated in several autoimmune diseases. Several studies have found that low levels of vitamin D are associated with increased autoimmunity.
A role for vitamin D in AMD is not only plausible in terms of the known biological roles of vitamin D, but also because of the diminished ability to produce vitamin D with advanced age [99]. The problem of vitamin D deficiency is not only prevalent among the elderly: as of 2005, approximately 40 per cent of men and 50 per cent of women aged over 18 from the USA were estimated to have inadequate levels of 25(OH)D [100].
Conclusion
In summary, using multiple lines of evidence, this study demonstrated an association between the vitamin D pathway and AMD. Specifically, there is a protective association between UV radiation and neovascular AMD which is independent of smoking and CFH and HTRA1 polymorphisms. Additionally, we identified an association between genetic variation in the major vitamin D catabolic gene, CYP24A1, and risk for all forms of AMD and, specifically, the neovascular form of AMD. Further experiments are needed to elucidate the role of vitamin D and UV light in the pathogenesis of AMD. Ongoing large-scale trials of supplemental vitamin D may provide a unique opportunity to examine the effects of vitamin D on AMD in a randomised trial setting. Such studies may have important implications for the prevention and/or treatment of neovascular AMD by the regulation of modifiable lifestyle factors that influence levels of vitamin D.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients and their siblings for their participation in this study. We also thank Anne Marie Lane, Amanda Harring and Trevor Arneberg for their help on this project and Fei Ji, for critical and helpful discussions on statistical analysis.
This work was supported by grants from the Lincy Foundation; the Massachusetts Lions; Friends of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; Genetics of Age-related Macular Degeneration Fund; MEEI; the Edward N. & Della L. Thome Memorial Foundation; an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah; Hope for Vision and the National Institutes of Health [EY014458, EY14104, EY017362, EY017404].
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000, 100: 57-70. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9.Google Scholar
Ding X, Patel M, Chan C-C: Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009, 28: 1-18. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.10.001.Google Scholar
Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW: Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358: 2606-2617. 10.1056/NEJMra0801537.Google Scholar
Anderson DH, Mullins RF, Hageman GS, Johnson LV: A role for local inflammation in the formation of drusen in the aging eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002, 134: 411-431. 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01624-0.Google Scholar
Hageman GS, Luthert PJ, Victor Chong NH, Johnson LV, et al: An integrated hypothesis that considers drusen as biomarkers of immune-mediated processes at the RPE-Bruch's membrane interface in aging and age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001, 20: 705-732. 10.1016/S1350-9462(01)00010-6.Google Scholar
Beatty S, Koh H, Phil M, Henson D, et al: The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000, 45: 115-134. 10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00140-5.Google Scholar
Dong A, Xie B, Shen J, Yoshida T, et al: Oxidative stress promotes ocular neovascularization. J Cell Physiol. 2009, 219: 544-552. 10.1002/jcp.21698.Google Scholar
Dong LM, Ulrich CM, Hsu L, Duggan DJ, et al: Vitamin D related genes CYP24A1 and CYP27B1, and colon cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009, 18: 2540-2548. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0228.Google Scholar
Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S, Scott WK, et al: Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005, 308: 419-421. 10.1126/science.1110359.Google Scholar
Jakobsdottir J, Conley YP, Weeks DE, Mah TS, et al: Susceptibility genes for age-related maculopathy on chromosome 10q26. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 77: 389-407. 10.1086/444437.Google Scholar
Khansari N, Shakiba Y, Mahmoudi M: Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress as a major cause of age-related diseases and cancer. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2009, 3: 73-80. 10.2174/187221309787158371.Google Scholar
Klein R, Klein BEK, Knudtson MD, Wong TY, et al: Systemic markers of inflammation endothelial dysfunction, and age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005, 140: 35-44.Google Scholar
Murdoch C, Muthana M, Coffelt SB, Lewis CE: The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 618-631. 10.1038/nrc2444.Google Scholar
Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Sinha P: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: Linking inflammation and cancer. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 4499-4506. 10.4049/jimmunol.0802740.Google Scholar
Pan J-S, Hong M-Z, Ren J-L: Reactive oxygen species: A double-edged sword in oncogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009, 15: 1702-1707. 10.3748/wjg.15.1702.Google Scholar
Pittet MJ: Behavior of immune players in the tumor microen-vironment. Curr Opin Oncol. 2009, 21: 53-59. 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32831bc38a.Google Scholar
Shan W, Yang G, Liu J: The inflammatory network: Bridging senescent stroma and epithelial tumorigenesis. Front Biosci. 2009, 14: 4044-4057.Google Scholar
Swaroop A, Chew EY, Rickman CB, Abecasis GR: Unraveling a multifactorial late-onset disease: From genetic susceptibility to disease mechanisms for age-related macular degeneration. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009, 10: 19-43. 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164350.Google Scholar
Visconti R, Grieco D: New insights on oxidative stress in cancer. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2009, 12: 240-245.Google Scholar
Deeb KK, Trump DL, Johnson CS: Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: Potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7: 684-700. 10.1038/nrc2196.Google Scholar
Egan KM: Vitamin D and melanoma. Ann Epidemiol. 2009, 19: 455-461. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.01.005.Google Scholar
Garland FC, Garland CF, Gorham ED, Young JF: Geographic variation in breast cancer mortality in the United States: A hypothesis involving exposure to solar radiation. Prev Med. 1990, 19: 614-622. 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90058-R.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz ES, Garland CF: Sunlight vitamin D, and ovarian cancer mortality rates in US women. Int J Epidemiol. 1994, 23: 1133-1136. 10.1093/ije/23.6.1133.Google Scholar
Holick MF: Vitamin D and bone health. J Nutr. 1996, 126 (4 Suppl): 1159S-1164S.Google Scholar
Shokravi MT, Marcus DM, Alroy J, Egan K, et al: Vitamin D inhibits angiogenesis in transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995, 36: 83-87.Google Scholar
Iseki K, Tatsuta M, Uehara H, Iishi H, et al: Inhibition of angiogenesis as a mechanism for inhibition by 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 of colon carcinogenesis induced by azoxymethane in Wistar rats. Int J Cancer. 1999, 81: 730-733. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990531)81:5<730::AID-IJC11>3.0.CO;2-Q.Google Scholar
Hansen CM, Hansen D, Holm PK, Binderup L: Vitamin D compounds exert anti-apoptotic effects in human osteosarcoma cells in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2001, 77: 1-11. 10.1016/S0960-0760(01)00033-4.Google Scholar
Hayes CE, Nashold FE, Spach KM, Pedersen LB: The immunological functions of the vitamin D endocrine system. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2003, 49: 277-300.Google Scholar
Abe E, Miyaura C, Sakagami H, Takeda M, et al: Differentiation of mouse myeloid leukemia cells induced by 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981, 78: 4990-4994. 10.1073/pnas.78.8.4990.Google Scholar
Ravid A, Koren R: The role of reactive oxygen species in the anticancer activity of vitamin D. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003, 164: 357-367.Google Scholar
Ahn J, Albanes D, Berndt SI, Peters U, et al: Vitamin D-related genes. serum vitamin D concentrations and prostate cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2009, 30: 769-776. 10.1093/carcin/bgp055.Google Scholar
Bär M, Domaschke D, Meye A, Lehmann B, et al: Wavelength-dependent induction of CYP24A1-mRNA after UVB-triggered calcitriol synthesis in cultured human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2007, 127: 206-213. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700493.Google Scholar
Lanske B, Razzaque MS: Vitamin D and aging: Old concepts and new insights. J Nutr Biochem. 2007, 18: 771-777. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.02.002.Google Scholar
Parekh N, Chappell RJ, Millen AE, Albert DM, et al: Association between vitamin D and age-related macular degeneration in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988 through 1994. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994, 125: 661-669.Google Scholar
Seddon JM, Santangelo SL, Book K, Chong S, et al: A genomewide scan for age-related macular degeneration provides evidence for linkage to several chromosomal regions. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 73: 780-790. 10.1086/378505.Google Scholar
Iyengar SK, Song D, Klein BEK, Klein R, et al: Dissection of genomewide-scan data in extended families reveals a major locus and oligogenic susceptibility for age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74: 20-39. 10.1086/380912.Google Scholar
DeAngelis MM, Lane AM, Shah CP, Ott J, et al: Extremely discordant sib-pair study design to determine risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004, 122: 575-580. 10.1001/archopht.122.4.575.Google Scholar
DeAngelis MM, Ji F, Adams S, Morrison MA, et al: Alleles in the HtrA serine peptidase 1 gene alter the risk of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2008, 115: 1209-1215.e7. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.032.Google Scholar
Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group: A randomized. placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 1417-1436.Google Scholar
Silveira AC, Morrison MA, Ji F, Xu H, et al: Convergence of linkage. gene expression and association data demonstrates the influence of the RAR-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA) gene on neovascular AMD: A systems biology based approach. Vision Res. 2010, 50: 698-715. 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.016.Google Scholar
Klein R, Klein BEK, Tomany SC, Moss SE: Ten-year incidence of age-related maculopathy and smoking and drinking: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002, 156: 589-598. 10.1093/aje/kwf092.Google Scholar
Schaumberg DA, Chasman D, Morrison MA, Adams SM, et al: Prospective study of common variants in the retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor ? gene and risk of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010, 128: 1462-1471. 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.261.Google Scholar
Schaumberg DA, Hankinson SE, Guo Q, Rimm E, et al: A prospective study of 2 major age-related macular degeneration susceptibility alleles and interactions with modifiable risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007, 125: 55-62. 10.1001/archopht.125.1.55.Google Scholar
Hollis BW, Kamerud JQ, Selvaag SR, Lorenz JD, et al: Determination of vitamin D status by radioimmunoassay with an 125I-labeled tracer. Clin Chem. 1993, 39: 529-533.Google Scholar
Chong NHV, Keonin J, Luthert PJ, Frennesson CI, et al: Decreased thickness and integrity of the macular elastic layer of Bruch's membrane correspond to the distribution of lesions associated with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Pathol. 2005, 166: 241-251. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62248-1.Google Scholar
Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hancox LS, et al: A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 7227-7232. 10.1073/pnas.0501536102.Google Scholar
Mullins RF, Russell SR, Anderson DH, Hageman GS: Drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration contain proteins common to extracellular deposits associated with atherosclerosis elastosis, amyloidosis, and dense deposit disease. FASEB J. 2000, 14: 835-846.Google Scholar
Seddon JM, Santangelo SL, Book K, Chong S, et al: A genomewide scan for age-related macular degeneration provides evidence for linkage to several chromosomal regions. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 73: 780-790. 10.1086/378505.Google Scholar
Srivatsan A, Han Y, Peng J, Tehranchi AK, et al: High-precision. whole-genome sequencing of laboratory strains facilitates genetic studies. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4: e1000139-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000139.Google Scholar
Andreoli MT, Morrison MA, Kim BJ, Chen L, et al: Comprehensive analysis of complement factor H and LOC387715/ARMS2/HTRA1 variants with respect to phenotype in advanced age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009, 148: 869-874. 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.002.Google Scholar
DeAngelis MM, Ji F, Kim IK, Adams S, et al: Cigarette smoking. CFH, APOE, ELOVL4, and risk of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007, 125: 49-54. 10.1001/archopht.125.1.49.Google Scholar
Zhang H, Morrison MA, Dewan A, Adams S, et al: The NEI/NCBI dbGAP database: Genotypes and haplotypes that may specifically predispose to risk of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. BMC Med Genet. 2008, 9: 51-Google Scholar
Dudbridge F: Likelihood-based association analysis for nuclear families and unrelated subjects with missing genotype data. Hum Hered. 2008, 66: 87-98. 10.1159/000119108.Google Scholar
Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, et al: The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002, 296: 2225-2229. 10.1126/science.1069424.Google Scholar
Francis PJ, Schultz DW, Hamon S, Ott J, et al: Haplotypes in the complement factor H (CFH) gene: Associations with drusen and advanced age-related macular degeneration. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e1197-10.1371/journal.pone.0001197.Google Scholar
Dixon AL, Liang L, Moffatt MF, Chen W, et al: A genome-wide association study of global gene expression. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1202-1207. 10.1038/ng2109.Google Scholar
Moffatt MF, Kabesch M, Liang L, Dixon AL, et al: Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma. Nature. 2007, 448: 470-473. 10.1038/nature06014.Google Scholar
Albert DM, Marcus DM, Gallo JP, O'Brien JM: The antineoplastic effect of vitamin D in transgenic mice with retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992, 33: 2354-2364.Google Scholar
Clark AG: The role of haplotypes in candidate gene studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2004, 27: 321-333. 10.1002/gepi.20025.Google Scholar
Rivera A, Fisher SA, Fritsche LG, Keilhauer CN, et al: Hypothetical LOC387715 is a second major susceptibility gene for age-related macular degeneration contributing independently of complement factor H to disease risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2005, 14: 3227-3236. 10.1093/hmg/ddi353.Google Scholar
Yang Z, Camp NJ, Sun H, Tong Z, et al: A variant of the HTRA1 gene increases susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2006, 314: 992-993. 10.1126/science.1133811.Google Scholar
Dewan A, Liu M, Hartman S, Zhang SS-M, et al: HTRA1 promoter polymorphism in wet age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2006, 314: 989-992. 10.1126/science.1133807.Google Scholar
Cantorna MT: Vitamin D and its role in immunology: Multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006, 92: 60-64. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.02.020.Google Scholar
Fears TR, Bird CC, Guerry D, Sagebiel RW, et al: Average midrange ultraviolet radiation flux and time outdoors predict melanoma risk. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 3992-3996.Google Scholar
Solomon CC, White E, Kristal AR, Vaughan T: Melanoma and lifetime UV radiation. Cancer Causes Control. 2004, 15: 893-902. 10.1007/s10552-004-1142-9.Google Scholar
de Gruijl FR: p53 mutations as a marker of skin cancer risk: Comparison of UVA and UVB effects. Exp Dermatol. 2002, 11 (Suppl 1): 37-39.Google Scholar
The Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group: Risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992, 110: 1701-1708.Google Scholar
Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE: Sunlight and age-related macular degeneration. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993, 111: 514-518. 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090040106042.Google Scholar
Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Nondahl DM: Sunlight and the 5-year incidence of early age-related maculopathy: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 246-250.Google Scholar
Darzins P, Mitchell P, Heller RF: Sun exposure and age-related macular degeneration. An Australian case-control study. Ophthalmology. 1997, 104: 770-776.Google Scholar
Delcourt C, Carrière I, Ponton-Sanchez A, Fourrey S, et al: Light exposure and the risk of age-related macular degeneration: The Pathologies Oculaires Liées à l'Age (POLA) study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 1463-1468. 10.1001/archopht.119.10.1463.Google Scholar
Dillon J, Zheng L, Merriam JC, Gaillard ER: Transmission of light to the aging human retina: Possible implications for age related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2004, 79: 753-759. 10.1016/j.exer.2004.06.025.Google Scholar
Fletcher AE, Bentham GC, Agnew M, Young IS, et al: Sunlight exposure. antioxidants, and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008, 126: 1396-1403. 10.1001/archopht.126.10.1396.Google Scholar
McCarty CA, Mukesh BN, Fu CL, Mitchell P, et al: Risk factors for age-related maculopathy: The Visual Impairment Project. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 1455-1462. 10.1001/archopht.119.10.1455.Google Scholar
Rosenthal FS, Phoon C, Bakalian AE, Taylor HR: The ocular dose of ultraviolet radiation to outdoor workers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988, 29: 649-656.Google Scholar
Taylor HR, Mun ~oz B, West S, Bressler NM, et al: Visible light and risk of age-related macular degeneration. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1990, 88: 163-173. discussion 173-178Google Scholar
Tomany SC, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BEK, et al: Sunlight and the 10-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004, 122: 750-757. 10.1001/archopht.122.5.750.Google Scholar
West SK, Rosenthal FS, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, et al: Exposure to sunlight and other risk factors for age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989, 107: 875-879. 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010897038.Google Scholar
West SK, Duncan DD, Mun ~oz B, Rubin GS, et al: Sunlight exposure and risk of lens opacities in a population-based study: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation project. JAMA. 1998, 280: 714-718. 10.1001/jama.280.8.714.Google Scholar
Khan JC, Shahid H, Thurlby DA, Bradley M, et al: Age related macular degeneration and sun exposure. iris colour, and skin sensitivity to sunlight. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006, 90: 29-32. 10.1136/bjo.2005.073825.Google Scholar
Winkler BS, Boulton ME, Gottsch JD, Sternberg P: Oxidative damage and age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 1999, 5: 32-Google Scholar
Roduit R, Schorderet DF: MAP kinase pathways in UV-induced apoptosis of retinal pigment epithelium ARPE19 cells. Apoptosis. 2008, 13: 343-353. 10.1007/s10495-008-0179-8.Google Scholar
Patton WP, Chakravarthy U, Davies RJ, Archer DB: Comet assay of UV-induced DNA damage in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999, 40: 3268-3275.Google Scholar
Tratsk KS, Thanos S: UV irradiation causes multiple cellular changes in cultured human retinal pigment epithelium cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003, 241: 852-859. 10.1007/s00417-003-0747-0.Google Scholar
Chan C-M, Huang J-H, Lin H-H, Chiang H-S, et al: Protective effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate on UVA-induced damage in ARPE19 cells. Mol Vis. 2008, 14: 2528-2534.Google Scholar
Tobi SE, Gilbert M, Paul N, McMillan TJ: The green tea polyphenol. epigallocatechin-3-gallate, protects against the oxidative cellular and genotoxic damage of UVA radiation. Int J Cancer. 2002, 102: 439-444. 10.1002/ijc.10730.Google Scholar
Mantena SK, Meeran SM, Elmets CA, Katiyar SK: Orally administered green tea polyphenols prevent ultraviolet radiation-induced skin cancer in mice through activation of cytotoxic T cells and inhibition of angiogenesis in tumors. J Nutr. 2005, 135: 2871-2877.Google Scholar
Berwick M, Armstrong BK, Ben-Porat L, Fine J, et al: Sun exposure and mortality from melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 195-199. 10.1093/jnci/dji019.Google Scholar
Smedby KE, Hjalgrim H, Melbye M, Torrång A, et al: Ultraviolet radiation exposure and risk of malignant lymphomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 199-209. 10.1093/jnci/dji022.Google Scholar
Meunier L, Raison-Peyron N, Meynadier J: ['UV-induced immunosuppression and skin cancers']. Rev Med Interne. 1998, 19: 247-254. 10.1016/S0248-8663(97)89326-5.Google Scholar
Vojnikovic B, Njiric S, Coklo M, Spanjol J: Ultraviolet sun radiation and incidence of age-related macular degeneration on Croatian Island. Rab Coll Antropol. 2007, 31 (Suppl 1): 43-44.Google Scholar
Vojnikovic B, Synek S, Mi?ovi? V, Telezar M, et al: Epidemiological study of sun exposure and visual field damage in children in Primorsko-Goranska County -- The risk factors of earlier development of macular degeneration. Coll Antropol. 2010, 34 (Suppl 2): 57-59.Google Scholar
Hyman LG, Lilienfeld AM, Ferris FL, Fine SL: Senile macular degeneration: A case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1983, 118: 213-227.Google Scholar
Millen AE, Voland R, Sondel SA, Parekh N, et al: Vitamin D status and early age-related macular degeneration in postmenopausal women. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011, 129: 481-489. 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.48.Google Scholar
Holick MF: Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 266-281. 10.1056/NEJMra070553.Google Scholar
Plum LA, DeLuca HF: Vitamin D. disease and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010, 9: 941-955. 10.1038/nrd3318.Google Scholar
Toner CD, Davis CD, Milner JA: The vitamin D and cancer conundrum: Aiming at a moving target. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010, 110: 1492-1500. 10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.007.Google Scholar
Krishnan AV, Trump DL, Johnson CS, Feldman D: The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention and treatment. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010, 39: 401-418. 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.02.011.Google Scholar
Elmadfa I, Meyer AL: Body composition changing physiological functions and nutrient requirements of the elderly. Ann Nutr Metab. 2008, 52 (Suppl 1): 2-5.Google Scholar
Zadshir A, Tareen N, Pan D, Norris K, et al: The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among US adults: Data from the NHANES III. Ethn Dis. 2005, 15 (4 Suppl 5): S5-97-S5-101.Google Scholar
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright BioMed Central 2011
Abstract
Vitamin D has been shown to have anti-angiogenic properties and to play a protective role in several types of cancer, including breast, prostate and cutaneous melanoma. Similarly, vitamin D levels have been shown to be protective for risk of a number of conditions, including cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, as well as numerous autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel diseases and type 1 diabetes mellitus. A study performed by Parekh et al. was the first to suggest a role for vitamin D in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and showed a correlation between reduced serum vitamin D levels and risk for early AMD. Based on this study and the protective role of vitamin D in diseases with similar pathophysiology to AMD, we examined the role of vitamin D in a family-based cohort of 481 sibling pairs. Using extremely phenotypically discordant sibling pairs, initially we evaluated the association of neovascular AMD and vitamin D/sunlight-related epidemiological factors. After controlling for established AMD risk factors, including polymorphisms of the genes encoding complement factor H (CFH) and age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2/HtrA serine peptidase (ARMS2/HTRA1), and smoking history, we found that ultraviolet irradiance was protective for the development of neovascular AMD (p = 0.001). Although evaluation of serum vitamin D levels (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]) was higher in unaffected individuals than in their affected siblings, this finding did not reach statistical significance.
Based on the relationship between ultraviolet irradiance and vitamin D production, we employed a candidate gene approach for evaluating common variation in key vitamin D pathway genes (the genes encoding the vitamin D receptor [VDR]; cytochrome P450, family 27, subfamily B, polypeptide 1 [CYP27B1]; cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 [CYP24A1]; and CYP27A1) in this same family-based cohort. Initial findings were then validated and replicated in the extended family cohort, an unrelated case-control cohort from central Greece and a prospective nested case-control population from the Nurse's Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Studies, which included patients with all subtypes of AMD for a total of 2,528 individuals. Single point variants in CYP24A1 (the gene encoding the catabolising enzyme of the vitamin D pathway) were demonstrated to influence AMD risk after controlling for smoking history, sex and age in all populations, both separately and, more importantly, in a meta-analysis. This is the first report demonstrating a genetic association between vitamin D metabolism and AMD risk. These findings were also supplemented with expression data from human donor eyes and human retinal cell lines. These data not only extend previous biological studies in the AMD field, but further emphasise common antecedents between several disorders with an inflammatory/immunogenic component such as cardiovascular disease, cancer and AMD.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer