Content area
Full text
Cara E. Ellis. 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2 Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Laura K. Ellis. 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2 Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Ryan S. Korbutt. 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2 Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Erik J. Suuronen. 3 Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Gregory S. Korbutt. 1 Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2 Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
© Cara E. Ellis et al. 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
*, Address correspondence to: Gregory S. Korbutt, PhD, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, 5-002 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada, , E-mail: [email protected]
Introduction
Islet transplantation is a promising clinical cell-based therapy for treatment of type 1 diabetes.1-4 However, despite remarkable progress, the liver implantation site remains far from ideal. Clinical transplantation of islets into the portal vein has been associated with life-threatening intraperitoneal bleeding,5 portal vein thrombosis, and hepatic steatosis.6,7 The liver may also contribute to the gradual attrition of chronic islet graft function.8 Search for a safer alternative site for islet transplantation is therefore desirable and an important issue to address.9 Using biomaterials to deliver islets to an alternate site could be advantageous if vascularization was promoted, particularly if an immune barrier could also be incorporated into the device.9 Diverse techniques have been attempted to this end, including utilizing a polyethylene terephthalate mesh bag,10 a polyurethane foam dressing,11 a stainless steel mesh with polytetrafluoroethylene stoppers,12 and gelatin microspheres in a collagen-coated polyvinyl bag.13 Most devices for islet delivery are based on synthetic polymers, which offer the advantages of complete control over mechanical and chemical properties and lower manufacturing costs14,15 ; however, natural polymers offer significant advantages of their own, including the ability of their degradation by-products to be metabolized.