ARTICLE
Received 27 Apr 2016 | Accepted 16 Jun 2016 | Published 26 Jul 2016
S. Marchi1, A.I. Ermakov2, C.A. Raymond3, R.R. Fu4, D.P. OBrien5, M.T. Bland6, E. Ammannito7, M.C. De Sanctis8,T. Bowling9, P. Schenk10, J.E.C. Scully3, D.L. Buczkowski11, D.A. Williams12, H. Hiesinger13 & C.T. Russell7
Asteroids provide fundamental clues to the formation and evolution of planetesimals. Collisional models based on the depletion of the primordial main belt of asteroids predict 1015 craters 4400 km should have formed on Ceres, the largest object between Mars and
Jupiter, over the last 4.55 Gyr. Likewise, an extrapolation from the asteroid Vesta would require at least 67 such basins. However, Ceres surface appears devoid of impact craters
4B280 km. Here, we show a signicant depletion of cerean craters down to 100150 km in diameter. The overall scarcity of recognizable large craters is incompatible with collisional models, even in the case of a late implantation of Ceres in the main belt, a possibility raised by the presence of ammoniated phyllosilicates. Our results indicate that a signicant population of large craters has been obliterated, implying that long-wavelength topography viscously relaxed or that Ceres experienced protracted widespread resurfacing.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 OPEN
The missing large impact craters on Ceres
1 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA. 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA. 4 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, New York, New York 10968, USA. 5 Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona 85719, USA. 6 USGS Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA.
7 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. 8 Istituto di Astrosica e Planetologia Spaziali, INAF, Roma 00133, Italy. 9 Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. 10 Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas 77058, USA. 11 John Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland 20723, USA. 12 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA. 13 Institut fr Planetologie, Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat, Mnster 48149, Germany. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.M. (email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257
It is generally accepted that planets formed by the accretion of smaller building blocks that are referred to as planetesimals (for example, ref. 1). In the present solar system, main belt
asteroids between Mars and Jupiter represent the leftovers of the initial population of planetesimals. As such, main belt asteroids have long been considered to retain important clues about the formation and collisional evolution of planetesimals25.
Ceres, with a mean diameter of 939 km, is by far the largest object in the main belt. Earlier observations concluded that Ceres is likely partially differentiated6, a prediction conrmed by gravity eld measurements by the Dawn spacecraft7. As a result, it is believed that Ceres accretion took place early in the solar systempossibly within a few Myr after condensation of the rst solidswhile radiogenic heating by 26Al decay was still extant. Therefore, it is likely that Ceres witnessed most of solar system evolution. Furthermore, because Ceres resides in a collisionally intense environment, impacts with nearby siblings are expected to be a primary evolutionary process for its outermost layers.
By virtue of its large cross section and ancient formation, Ceres offers a unique opportunity to study the earliest and most violent phase of collisional evolution by sampling craters whose sizes can largely exceed those on any other asteroid. As a comparison, the largest crater on 525 km asteroid Vestathe second largest asteroid visited by a spacecraftis B500 km across8. It is indeed commonly observed even among smaller asteroids that the largest recognizable crater approaches the size of the parent body9.
Ceres, however, lacks craters in excess of B280 km in diameter, and it is, as shown here, severely depleted in large craters down to 100150 km in diameter. At the same time, large portions of Ceres northern hemisphere are saturated with craters 60 km in diameter or smaller. These ndings are utterly incompatible with current collisional models over a wide range of assumptions, including a late implantation of Ceres into the main belt, a possibility suggested by the discovery of widespread ammoniated phyllosilicates1012. We conclude that a signicant
population of large cerean craters has been obliterated beyond recognition over geological time scales, likely the result of Ceres peculiar composition and internal evolution. Finally, we present topographic evidence for the presence of onepossibly two 800 km diameter depressions that may be relict impact basins from large collisions that took place early in Ceres history.
ResultsGlobal crater distribution. Ceres surface exhibits a plethora of impact craters, making cratering a primary geological and evolutionary process. The spatial density of craters 420 km, however, is very asymmetric and varies across the surface by a factor of B5, with the highest density found in the northern hemisphere (Fig. 1a). The latter have reached a level of crater spatial density, in the range 2070 km, compatible with saturation. The global size-frequency distribution (SFD) for large craters (Z70 km) is shown in Fig. 1a. The spatial density of craters in the size range 7080 km approaches that of the most heavily cratered terrain, found in the northern hemisphere. At crater sizes in the range B100280 km, however, the global record of craters drops off, deviating signicantly from predictions based on the current main belt asteroid SFD (Fig. 1a). The largest conrmed impact craters are Kerwan and Yalode, with approximate diameters of 280 and 270 km, respectively13.
Ceres depleted large crater population is also at odds with that of Vesta, despite their similar collisional environment14. Vesta exhibits a signicant number of larger craters (Z150 km; ref. 8), including two basins 4400 km (Fig. 1a). Topographic evolution models based on an ice-rich shell indicate that cerean craters could be partially or completely viscously relaxed when compared with rocky bodies, such as Vesta15. However, Ceres signicant topography range ( 7.3 km, 9.5 km) with respect to the
482 482 446 km reference ellipsoid7,16, locally high crater
spatial densities (Fig. 1a) and high crater depth-to-diameter
a b
103
104
105
106
107
103
104
105
106
107
Cumulative number of craters (km2 )
Cumulative number of craters (km2 )
Heavily cratered terrains
Whole surface
Whole surface
Vesta Vesta
Vendimia Planitia Main belt model Large depressions
10 100 1,000 10 100 1,000
Crater diameter (km) Crater diameter (km)
Figure 1 | Ceres global large crater size-frequency distribution. (a) Cumulative crater counts on the whole surface for diameter 470 km (magenta). For a comparison, counts for the heavily cratered terrain (blue) are also reported: The drop-off at 7080 km is due to the limited area of the counting region (for latitudes northern than 50 N, B15% of the surface). A model crater size-frequency distribution (dashed curve) is also reported (see Methods section). Note that the model curve has been vertically shifted to match the heavily cratered terrains at 2060 km, thus it underestimates the number of large craters produced over 4.55 Gyr (see text). Black thin lines and shaded region mark empirical saturation, dened as 10% of the geometrical saturation39. (b) Crater cumulative counts for the northern part of Vendimia Planitia (green), as the southern part has been largely reset by the formation of Kerwan crater. The black vertical line indicates 12 basins of 800 km in diameter (see text). Vestas large crater count8 is also indicated (cyan). Error bars correspond to Poisson statistics of the cumulative numbers.
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 ARTICLE
a
0.0 4.55
Time (Gyr ago)
b
Figure 2 | Simulated and observed large craters on Ceres. (a) Mollweide projection of all impact craters 4100 km (B170) expected to have formed since 4.55 Gyr ago. The picture shows a representative Monte Carlo simulation for our nominal model (see text). Colour code provides epoch of formation.
The implementation of the Monte Carlo code follows a recent work40. The simulations track all the collisions with impactors 42 km, but here only the large ones are shown. While old craters are obliterated by subsequent cratering, empirical saturation shows that some 40 craters 4100 km should be retained (Fig. 1). (b) Mollweide projection of a Ceres global mosaic showing observed 16 conrmed craters 4100 km (yellow lines).
ratios17, argue against relaxation of an ice-rich shell as the primary cause for the lack of large craters.
Ceres collisional evolution. To quantitatively investigate the lack of large cerean craters, we ran a suite of Monte Carlo collisional models of Ceres assuming it had its current position in the main belt over the last 4.55 Gyr. The current estimated intrinsic collisional probability is Pi 3.55 10 18 per year per km2, assumed
to be constant through time (see Methods section). However, the total number of main belt asteroids, Nmb(t), is expected to have been higher in the past1820. As a result, the number of collisions per unit time per unit surface was also higher in the past, Ncoll(t) (Pi/4p) Nmb(t), where the factor 4p arises to express
impacts per unit of target surface (see Methods section). Here, we apply a recent impact ux model calibrated at Vesta21 (see Methods section for details). Impactor sizes (d) were randomly drawn from the current main belt SFD, which is a reasonable approximation of the impactor size distribution over Ceres history since the asteroid belt likely reached collisional equilibrium on a time scale o100 Myr (ref. 22). Finally, crater sizes (D) were computed using a crater scaling law23. For the crater size range of interest here (DB100800 km), the adopted
scaling implies DB1013 d, and we implemented a
conservative factor of 10 for the nominal model. The results of the nominal model are shown in Fig. 2a. Furthermore, we investigate the effects of uncertainties in the crater scaling law by comparing it with alternate scaling laws24, and dedicated hydrocode impact simulations25. The latter results in the most conservative scaling for the nal crater size, D 7.6 d, which
thus provides a lower bound for the number of craters at any given size (see Methods section). We ran B103 simulations, and found that the model predicts the formation of about 90180 craters 4100 km, 4070 4150 km and 914 4400 km. The range corresponds to D/d 7.6 and 10, respectively, as indicated
above. Statistical uncertainties associated with our collisional model are within the indicated ranges. The total number of expected large craters indicates heavy reworking of the upper 10 15 km layers of Ceres, with important implications for the observed surface composition, geology and retention of crater morphology. In fact, the maximum number of detectable craters based on empirical saturation (Fig. 1a) is B40 and B20, respectively, for 100 and 150 km. At larger crater sizes, however, empirical saturation can be exceeded (as shown by VestaFig. 1and other asteroids9). Rescaling from Vesta by surface area, at least six to seven craters 4400 km are expected.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257
a
7.3 9.5
Elevation (km)
b c
4.5
6.8
Elevation (km)
9.5
7.3
Elevation (km)
Figure 3 | Ceres Vendimia Planitia. (a) Mollweide projection of Ceres topography. Dashed black line indicates a major depression or planitia. Black dots indicate the approximate centre of the depression. (b,c) 3D views of Vendimia Planitia in real and ltered topography, respectively. White lines indicate 45-spaced meridians and the equator. Topography range is 7.3 to 9.5 km, while ltered topographic range is 6.8 to 4.5 km. The latter
has been derived by applying a cosine taper to shape spherical harmonic coefcients between degree 15corresponding to a scale of 200 kmand degree30.
The lack of well-dened large cerean basins is, therefore, remarkable. Assuming Poisson statistics, the likelihood of having no impact crater 4400 km, if the average expectation is 6, is only0.3%. In addition, the probability of observing 16 craters 4100 km (Fig. 2b), if the observable average expectation is at least B40 (saturation), is vanishingly small.
Searching for relict impact structures. These results provide the motivation for an in-depth search for large-scale impact structures. We used a global stereo-photogrammetry topography model, with a spatial resolution of 130 m px 1 acquired during the 1,475 km high altitude mapping orbit. Similar results are obtained with stereo-photoclinometry topography. Overall, most of the Ceres surface is peppered by craters o B100 km, resulting in rugged topography, possibly hiding older, larger impact structures. Therefore, we use low-pass ltered topography to identify possible relict basins. A few quasi-circular and large-scale depressions, here referred to as planitiae, emerge. The most notable of these, Vendimia Planitia, is B800 km across (Fig. 3).
Despite the fact that parts of the rim and oor are interrupted by superposed large craters, most notably by Kerwan and Dantu, the overall structure appears well dened. Radial proles of ltered topography show a 34 km deep depression (Fig. 4a). A similar
prole is also derived from the actual topography (Fig. 4b). Notably, the average topographic proles show a distinctive conic-shaped trend, the presence of a raised rim and a gradual drop in elevation at increasing radial distances. These are all distinct markers for an impact structure. The overall shape of Vendimia Planitias topographic proles resembles that of the comparatively well-preserved Kerwan crater, if one takes into account minor post-formation evolution due to relaxation17 (see Methods section). Overall, this depression is the best candidate for a large crater recognizable on Ceres surface (two other examples of putative basins are discussed in the Methods section).
It is noteworthy to mention that signicant variations in spectral properties relative to Ceres average spectrum are consistently found within Vendimia Planitia. For instance, a map of the absorption band at 3.1 mm, characteristic of ammoniated phyllosilicates10,11, shows a broad area of enhanced absorption (interpreted as enriched in ammoniated phyllosilicates) that correlates with the large depression (see Methods section). It is conceivable that impact excavation could have exposed materials with a different composition and/or triggered local alteration processes. The 3.1 mm absorption is prominent in the ejecta of the young Dantu crater, indicating that spectral differences are not just due to a thin surface layer, but are deep-seated. In addition, Ceres Bouguer gravity (residual to the
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 ARTICLE
a
a
Elevation (km)
Elevation (km)
4
2
0
2
4
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
5
0
5
10 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Distance (km)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Distance (km)
Distance (km)
Elevation (km) Elevation (km)
0 200 400 600 800
10 0 200 400 600 800Distance (km)
b
b
5
0
5
Figure 4 | Topographic proles for Vendimia Planitia. (a,b) Filtered and real topography, respectively. Black lines are the median of the proles. Elevations are computed with respect to the 482 482 446 km
ellipsoid7,16. Distance is computed along the surface of the best ellipsoid. Topographic proles are for increments of 15 in azimuth, starting from the center of the feature (133, 21 N) (see Fig. 3). Black arrows indicated the position of the rims.
10.0
1.0
0.1
Figure 6 | Kerwan craters topographic proles. (a) Filtered topography, (b) real topography. Black lines are the median of the proles. Elevations are computed with respect to the 482 482 446 km ellipsoid7,16. Distance is
computed along the surface of the best ellipsoid. Topographic proles are for increments of 15 in azimuth starting from the centre of the feature.
a b
103
102
101
100
101
102 102 101 100 101 102
103
Projectile diameter, d (km)
Y = 108 (dyne per cm2) Y = 107 (dyne per cm2) Y = 106 (dyne per cm2)
Cumulative number
Final crater diameter, D(km)
D=50d
D=10d
0 1 2 3 4Time (Gyr ago)
Figure 5 | Model impact ux and crater scaling laws. (a) Cumulative number of impacts (normalized to 1 at 1 Gyr ago). Dashed lines indicate the approximate on-set of the late heavy bombardment (4.15 Gyr ago), and the end of the primordial depletion (4.4 Gyr ago), as described in the text. The shape of the impact ux curve is valid regardless of the impactor size, although it needs to be properly rescaled by the number of main belt asteroids larger than a given size to compute the actual number of collisions. (b) Solid curves correspond to the general crater scaling law of ref. 23 (their Table 1), corrected for the transient-to-nal crater size (using a factor of 1.3 as discussed at http://keith.aa.washington.edu/craterdata/scaling/usermanual.html
Web End =http://keith.aa.washington.edu/craterdata/scaling/usermanual.html http://keith.aa.washington.edu/craterdata/scaling/usermanual.html
Web End =; complex crater sizes are further corrected using ref. 41). Other scaling law parameters are n 0.4, m 0.55, K1 0.93. Different colours (red, green and
black) correspond to indicated values of target strength. Note that for D 4 B20 km, the effect of target strength becomes negligible, thus the actual value of strength does not affect our conclusions. As a reference, oblique grey lines indicate a constant scaling of D 10 d and D 50 d. Horizontal segments
(orange) indicate results from the scaling laws summarized in ref. 24. They were computed using three crater diameter values as reference (92 km Occator; 280 km Kerwan and 400 km). The left-most extreme of each line corresponds to ref. 24 hard rock scaling, while the right-most value corresponds to porous scaling. Finally, we report the results of iSALE simulations25 of Ceres cratering calibrated to reproduce Occator and Kerwan craters sizes (blues circles).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257
a
7.3 9.5
Elevation (km)
b d f
9.5
Elevation (km)
7.3
c e g
4.5
Elevation (km)
6.8
Figure 7 | Planitia B and C. (a) Mollweide projection of Ceres topography. (b,c) Real and ltered topography views centred at Vendimia Planitia, planitia B (d,e) and planitia C (f,g). Dashed black lines indicate the three major depressions or planitiae; while black dots indicate their approximate centres. (bg) White lines indicate 45-spaced meridians and the equator. Topography range is 7.3 to 9.5 km, while ltered topographic range is 6.8 to 4.5 km. The latter has been derived by applying a cosine taper to shape spherical harmonic coefcients between degree 15corresponding to a scale of 200 kmand degree 30.
gravity of a two-layer structure with uniform density layers) and topography are generally anti-correlated26. Thus, areas of low topographysuch as Vendimia Planitia, with an anomaly of 50 mGalthat are here interpreted as putative basins are underlain by relatively higher density material, indicating some degree of isostatic compensation. Craters superposed on this planitia are close to saturation, although somewhat below the heavily cratered terrains (Fig. 1b). This indicates that Vendimia Planitia is a very ancient feature, and if it is an impact basin, it is potentially responsible for the proposed Ceres paleo-family27. Note that the presence of 12 800 km basins is in line with extrapolation from the Vestas crater SFD (Fig. 1b).
DiscussionThe recent detection of widespread ammoniated phyllosilicates on Ceres has raised the possibility that Ceres could have been implanted in the main belt from the outer solar system10. Thus, this poses the question of whether a late implantation of Ceres into the main belts collisionally intense environment could explain the observed lack of large craters. From a dynamical standpoint, the latest possible time for such implantation to take
place is during the instability responsible for the so-called late heavy bombardment at 4.14.2 Gyr ago (refs 5,28). Because the post-instability dynamical evolution of the main belt is well understood, we can constrain the cratering history since this phase reasonably well29.
Following the computations described above, and assuming no collisions before implantation, the computed number of craters since 4.1 Gyr ago to the present time is 2443, 1017 and 34, respectively for 100, 150 and 400 km diameters. While the presence of one (up to three) large-scale depressions discussed above could be compatible with a late implantation, the depletion in the 100400 km size range is an overall very low probability event (o2%). Note that the above computation neglects cratering before implantation, thus it is a very conservative estimate. Furthermore, the cerean large crater SFD (D4100 km) does not match the main belt SFD (Fig. 1a). Thus, we can conclude that Ceres cratering is not due to a late implantation in the main belt. Likewise, we can rule out that the observed cratering is due to primordial sublimation of a thick layer of ice, as this phase would have been concluded well before the late instability30.
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 ARTICLE
a c
4 2 0 2 4 6
0 200 400 600 800
Distance (km)
Elevation (km) Elevation (km)
Elevation (km)
b
d
5
0
5
Elevation (km)
4 2 0 2 4 6
0 200 400 600 800
Distance (km)
5
0
5
10 0 200 400 600 800
Distance (km)
0 200 400 600 800
Distance (km)
Figure 8 | Planitia B and C topographic proles. (a,b) Filtered and real topography for planitia B; (c,d) Filtered and real topography for planitia C. Black lines are the median of the proles. Elevations are computed with respect to the 482 482 446 km ellipsoid7,16. Distance is computed along the
surface of the best ellipsoid. Topographic proles are for increments of 15 in azimuth starting from the centre of the feature. Black arrows indicated the position of the rims.
1400'0"W
100'0"N 100'0"S
a
1200'0"W 1000'0"W 800'0"W 600'0"W
1200'0"W
1400'0"W 800'0"W
1000'0"W 600'0"W
100'0"N 100'0"S
b c
Figure 9 | Pit chains south-west of planitia B. (a) Overview image of the set of pit chains whose pole plots in planitia B. (b,c) The blank (b) and annotated (c) inset images show part of the pit chain in the inset box in detail. The surface expression of the pit chain takes the form of merged pits in segment i while individual pits are still observed in segment ii and iii. The segments i, ii and iii are staggered/offset from one another, forming an en echelon pattern that is characteristic of fractures.
The formation of a signicant population of large craters, and their subsequent obliteration, is thus likely the result of Ceres internal processes. For instance, viscous relaxation of long-wavelength topography may obscure very old impact basins, although short wavelength features such as rims are projected to
survive over geological time scales, in analogy to the icy satellites (for example, ref. 31). It should also be noted that the presence of a thin low viscosity top layer, which could quickly remove rims, is ruled out by the locally high spatial density of km-sized craters. Alternatively, internal evolution models predict the possible
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257
0.050 0.118
Band depth
Figure 10 | Global map of the ammoniated phyllosilicates absorption band. The colour shows the strength of the ammoniated phyllosilicates absorption band at 3.1 micron; dark colours indicate deeper band. Dashed lines indicate the boundaries of the three planitiae (see Fig. 7). The map is a Mollweide projection in the latitude range 60 S60 N.
presence of liquid water for hundreds of Myr after formation of rst solids32,33, potentially resulting in protracted widespread cryovolcanism, whose last vestiges can perhaps be found in Ahuna Mons34, and the bright materials in Occator crater12. Widespread resurfacing could also provide an explanation for the pervasive presence of ammoniated phyllosilicates at the surface, as well as the lack of ancient crater rims. However, clear evidence for the presence of large-scale ow features is lacking at current image resolution. In addition to the aforementioned processes, rims could also be removed by the high spatial density of superposed smaller impacts.
Regardless of the specic mechanism(s) for crater rim removal, our result requires that large crater obliteration was active well after the late heavy bombardment. This conclusion reveals that Ceres cratering record is inextricably linked to its peculiar composition and internal evolution.
Methods
Ceres ancient impact ux and crater scaling laws. We estimated the collision probability of asteroids striking onto Ceres using the methods described in ref. 8. The resulting so-called intrinsic collision probability is Pi 3.55 10 18 per year
per km2, based on asteroids 450 km. Note that, following usual conventions,Pi is normalized to r2, where r is the radius of the target asteroid. Thus, the total number of impacts on an asteroid is Pi r2, and to calculate the number of impacts per unit area on the asteroid surface, this is divided by the asteroid surface area, Pi r2/(4p r2) Pi/(4p), which is the expression used in the main text. The time-
dependent cumulative number of collisions, following ref. 21, is reported in Fig. 5a.
We implemented several crater scaling laws to test robustness of our conclusions. The details of this analysis are shown in Fig. 5b. In all cases, we used an average impact speed of 5.1 km s 1 (computed using the methods described in ref. 8), a target density of 2.1 g cm 3, and a projectile density of 2.6 g cm 3. Notice that the actual densities have a limited effect to the nal crater sizes. For instance, a target density of 1.8 g cm 3 results in 5% larger craters, all other parameters being the same. Our adopted target density corresponds to Ceres bulk value, thus it is likely an upper limit for the outermost layers. Higher target densities result in smaller crater sizes, thus it implies a conservative estimate for the nal crater sizes. We also assumed a simple-to-complex crater transition of 10 km (ref. 7).
Among investigated crater scaling laws, iSALE simulations provided D/d ratios ranging from B9.410 to B7.68.2, respectively for Occator and Kerwan craters.
We thus assumed the most conservative scaling of D 7.6 d. The latter is used to
compute a lower limit bound for the number of large craters predicted by our collisional models, as described in the main text.
Topographic proles for Kerwan and other large depressions. Figure 6 reports the topographic proles of Kerwan crater, the largest conrmed impact structure on Ceres. Note, the conic-shape proles indicating that some degree of relaxation has taken place. These trends are qualitatively similar to those of Vendemia Planitia (Fig. 4), although the latter is certainly more relaxed due to an older formation age.
Additional large-scale depressions, indicated as Planitia B and C, are shown in Fig. 7. Planitia B is a 800 km depression delineated in the northern high latitudes by
a remarkable arcuate ridge that extends for 41,000 km. Most of the southern rim is not visible, possibly due to the superposed cratering (for example, Yalode crater) or enhanced viscous relaxation at low latitude, with the exception of a short high relief segment whose relationship to the northern ridge is unclear. Topographic proles across planitia B are noisier than those of Vendimia Planitia, although an average depression of 23 km with respect to the high relief ridge is observed (Fig. 8). In addition, the region immediately south of the putative centre of planitia B is the deepest depression on Ceres. A third, 500 km diameter feature, is also shown (planitia C). As before, topographic proles show a consistent increase in elevation with increasing radial distance from the centre and a shallow raised rim (Fig. 8).
Linear features and spectra variability. Notably, to the south-west of planitia B, there are clearly visible chains of pits (Fig. 7a; refs 16,35). The pits are roughly circular depressions, however, unlike impact craters, they tend to lack clearly dened rims and partially coalesce into one another (Fig. 9). This observation, along with the observations that the pit chains form en echelon patterns, indicates that the pit chains formed as the surface expression of subsurface fractures. The pit chains range in width from B1.5 to B11 km, and range in length from B50 to B380 km. The average spacing of the pit chains is B84 km and the deepest pit is B1.5 km deep. These pit chains are cross-cut by ejecta and scour marks from Yalode, Urvara and Occator craters, which indicates that the corresponding sub-surface fractures are older than the craters. We derive best-t planes for these fractures using the orientation of the overlying pit chains and likely dip angles. For this, we used dip angles of B6080, based on the work of refs 36,37, although further work is required to better constrain the geometry of the fractures. These planes return pole positions that are within planitia B (Fig. 7). This suggests that this depression could be an ancient impact structure, and that its formation may have fractured the surface of Ceres, which may be analogous to the formation of the Divalia Fossae and Saturnalia Fossae as a result of the Rheasivia and Veneneia impacts, respectively, on Vesta38; although in the latter cases, the dip angles were almost perpendicular to the surface.
The 3.1 mm band also shows a broad, weak variation that correlates with planitia B, although less pronounced than for Vendimia Planitia (Fig. 10). The strength of the absorption band has been computed as illustrated in ref. 11. The input spectra have been ltered for illumination conditions and level of reectance: only the spectra with incidence and emission angles o70, phase angle between 15 and 60
and average I/F brightness 40.004 have been considered. To maximize the coverage, the map has been generated merging data sets with 3.5, 1.1 and0.4 km px 1 spatial resolution (selecting at each location the best available resolution). However, other spectral maps do not show clear trends. An explanation could be that this is an older impact feature, consistent with the more subdued topography.
Finally, planitia B shows a clear correlation with a 50100 mGal positive gravity anomaly and planitia C shows the strongest correlation to a 4150 mgal positive gravity anomaly26, which is consistent with isostasy compensation of these features.
Data availability. Crater counts and outputs of collisional simulations are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Chambers, J. E. Planetary accretion in the inner Solar System. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 223, 241252 (2004).
2. Wetherill, G. W. An alternative model for the formation of the asteroids. Icarus 100, 307325 (1992).
8 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 ARTICLE
3. Bottke, W. F. et al. Linking the collisional history of the main asteroid belt to its dynamical excitation and depletion. Icarus 179, 6394 (2005).
4. Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn, D. & Levison, H. F. Asteroids were born big. Icarus 204, 558573 (2009).
5. Marchi, S. et al. High-velocity collisions from the lunar cataclysm recorded in asteroidal meteorites. Nat. Geosci. 6, 303307 (2013).
6. Thomas, P. C. et al. Differentiation of the asteroid Ceres as revealed by its shape. Nature 437, 224226 (2005).
7. Russell, C. T. et al. Dawn Arrives at Ceres: Exploration of a Small Volatile-Rich World. 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1275 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
8. Marchi, S. et al. The violent collisional history of Asteroid 4 Vesta. Science 336, 690 (2012).
9. Marchi, S., Chapman, C R., Barnouin, O. S., Richardson, J. E. & Vincent, J.-B. Cratering on Asteroids. (eds Asteroids IV, Patrick Michel, Francesca E. DeMeo, and William F. Bottke) 725744 (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2015).
10. De Sanctis, M. C. et al. Ammoniated phyllosilicates with a likely outer solar system origin on (1) Ceres. Nature 528, 241244 (2015).
11. Ammannito, E. et al. Distribution of Phyllosilicates on Ceres. 47th Lunar and Planetary Science) 3020 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
12. De Sanctis, M. C. et al. Bright carbonate deposits as evidence of aqueous alteration on (1) Ceres. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature18290 (2016).
13. Marchi, S. et al. Cratering on Ceres: The Puzzle of the Missing Large Craters. (47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference) 1281 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
14. OBrien, D. P., Sykes & Mark, V. The origin and evolution of the asteroid beltimplications for Vesta and Ceres. Space Sci. Rev. 163, 4161 (2011).
15. Bland, M. Predicted crater morphologies on Ceres: probing internal structure and evolution. Icarus 226, 510521 (2013).
16. Buczkowski, D. L. et al. Linear Structures on Ceres: Morphology, Orientation, and Possible Formation Mechanisms. (47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference) 1262 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
17. Bland, M. et al. Composition and structure of the shallow subsurface of Ceres revealed by crater morphology. Nat. Geosci 9, 538542 (2016).
18. Petit, J.-M., Morbidelli, A. & Chambers, J. The primordial excitation and clearing of the asteroid belt. Icarus 153, 338347 (2001).
19. OBrien, D. P., Morbidelli, A. & Bottke, W. F. The primordial excitation and clearing of the asteroid belt-Revisited. Icarus 191, 434452 (2007).
20. Minton, D. A. & Malhotra, R. Dynamical erosion of the asteroid belt and implications for large impacts in the inner solar system. Icarus 207, 744757 (2010).
21. OBrien, D. P. et al. Constraining the cratering chronology of Vesta. Planet. Space Sci. 103, 131142 (2014).
22. Bottke, W. F. et al. The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt. Icarus 175, 111140 (2005).
23. Holsapple, K. A. & Housen, K. R. A crater and its ejecta: an interpretation of deep impact. Icarus 187, 345356 (2007).
24. Johnson, B. C. et al. Spherule layers, crater scaling laws, and the population of ancient terrestrial impactors. Icarus 271, 350359 (2016).
25. Bowling, T. J. et al. in 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. LPI Contribution No. 1903, 2268 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
26. Park, R. S. et al. A partially differentiated interior for Ceres deduced from its gravity eld and shape. Nature. 10.1038/nature18955 (2016).
27. Carruba, V., Nesvorn, D., Marchi, S. & Aljbaae, S. Footprints of a possible Ceres asteroid paleo-family. eprint arXiv:1602.04736, 2016.
28. Levison, H. F. et al. Contamination of the asteroid belt by primordial trans-Neptunian objects. Nature 460, 364366 (2009).
29. Morbidelli, A., Walsh, K. J., OBrein, D. P.., Minton, D. A. & Bottke, W. F. The Dynamical Evolution of the Asteroid Belt (eds Asteroids IV, Patrick Michel, Francesca E. DeMeo, & William F. Bottke) 493507 (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2015).
30. Castillo-Rogez, J. C. et al. in 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, LPI Contribution No. 1903, 3012 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
31. Schenk, P. M. Thickness constraints on the icy shells of the galilean satellites from a comparison of crater shapes. Nature 417, 419421 (2002).
32. McCord, T. B. & Sotin, C. Ceres: evolution and current state. J. Geophys. Res. 110 , CiteID E05009 (2005).
33. Neveu, M. & Desch, S. J. Geochemistry, thermal evolution,and cryovolcanism on Ceres with a muddy ice mantle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10,19710,206 (2015).
34. Ruesch, O. et al. Ahuna Mons: A Geologically-Young Extrusive Dome on Ceres. (47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference) 2279 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
35. Scully, J. E. C. et al. Implications for the Geologic Evolution of Ceres, Derived from Global Geologic Mapping of Linear Features. (47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference) 1618 (The Woodlands, TX, 2016).
36. Wyrick, D. et al. Distribution, morphology, and origins of Martian pit crater chains. J. Geophys. Res. 109, E06005 120 (2004).
37. Ferrill, D. A. et al. Coseismic, dilational-fault and extension-fracture related pit chain formation in Iceland: analog to pit chains on Mars. Lithosphere 3, 133142 (2011).
38. Buczkowski, D. L. et al. Large-scale troughs on Vesta: a signature of planetary tectonics. Geophys. Res. 39, CiteID L18205 (2012).
39. Gault, D. E. Saturation and equilibrium conditions for impact cratering on the lunar surface: criteria and implications. Radio Sci. 5, 273 (1970).
40. Marchi, S. et al. Widespread mixing and burial of Earths Hadean crust by asteroid impacts. Nature 511, 578582 (2014).
41. Croft, S. K. The scaling of complex craters. J. Geophys. Res. 90, C828C842 (1985).
Acknowledgements
We thank W.F. Bottke, J.C. Andrews-Hanna and J. Castillo-Rogez for useful discussion.
We also thank J.H. Melosh and G.S. Collins for their meticulous comments that greatly
improved the quality of the paper.
Author contributions
S.M. conceived this work, performed collisional simulations and mapped cerean craters.
E.A. and C.A.R. provided topographic maps and support in interpreting topographic
data. R.R.F. and M.T.B. provided discussion about relaxation. D.P.O. provided
support with collisional models. E.A. and M.C.D.S. helped interpreting spectra data.
T.B. provided support with crater scaling laws. J.E.C.S. and D.L.B. provided support for
the analysis of linear features. All authors helped with interpretation and discussion of
the results.
Additional information
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests. Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/
http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: Marchi, S. et al. The missing large impact craters on Ceres.
Nat. Commun. 7:12257 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12257 (2016).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise
in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license,
users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material.
To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
r The Author(s) 2016
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12257 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12257 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 9
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2016
Abstract
Asteroids provide fundamental clues to the formation and evolution of planetesimals. Collisional models based on the depletion of the primordial main belt of asteroids predict 10-15 craters >400 km should have formed on Ceres, the largest object between Mars and Jupiter, over the last 4.55 Gyr. Likewise, an extrapolation from the asteroid Vesta would require at least 6-7 such basins. However, Ceres' surface appears devoid of impact craters >∼280 km. Here, we show a significant depletion of cerean craters down to 100-150 km in diameter. The overall scarcity of recognizable large craters is incompatible with collisional models, even in the case of a late implantation of Ceres in the main belt, a possibility raised by the presence of ammoniated phyllosilicates. Our results indicate that a significant population of large craters has been obliterated, implying that long-wavelength topography viscously relaxed or that Ceres experienced protracted widespread resurfacing.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer