Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry

Abstract

Processing of materials by ultrashort laser pulses has evolved signicantly over the last decade and is starting to reveal its scientic, technological and industrial potential. In ultrafast laser manufacturing, optical energy of tightly focused femtosecond or picosecond laser pulses can be delivered to precisely dened positions in the bulk of materials via two-/multi-photon excitation on a timescale much faster than thermal energy exchange between photoexcited electrons and lattice ions. Control of photo-ionization and thermal processes with the highest precision, inducing local photomodication in sub-100-nm-sized regions has been achieved. State-of-the-art ultrashort laser processing techniques exploit high 0.11 m spatial resolution and almost unrestricted three-dimensional structuring capability. Adjustable pulse duration, spatiotemporal chirp, phase front tilt and polarization allow control of photomodication via uniquely wide parameter space. Mature opto-electrical/mechanical technologies have enabled laser processing speeds approaching meters-per-second, leading to a fast lab-to-fab transfer. The key aspects and latest achievements are reviewed with an emphasis on the fundamental relation between spatial resolution and total fabrication throughput. Emerging biomedical applications implementing micrometer feature precision over centimeter-scale scaffolds and photonic wire bonding in telecommunications are highlighted.

OPEN

Light: Science & Applications (2016) 5, e16133; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

& 2016 CIOMP. All rights reserved 2047-7538/16 http://www.nature.com/lsa

Web End =www.nature.com/lsa

Mangirdas Malinauskas1, Albertas ukauskas1, Satoshi Hasegawa2, Yoshio Hayasaki2, Vygantas Mizeikis3, Riardas Buividas4 and Saulius Juodkazis4,5,6

Processing of materials by ultrashort laser pulses has evolved signicantly over the last decade and is starting to reveal its scientic, technological and industrial potential. In ultrafast laser manufacturing, optical energy of tightly focused femtosecond or picosecond laser pulses can be delivered to precisely dened positions in the bulk of materials via two-/multi-photon excitation on a timescale much faster than thermal energy exchange between photoexcited electrons and lattice ions. Control of photo-ionization and thermal processes with the highest precision, inducing local photomodication in sub-100-nm-sized regions has been achieved. State-of-the-art ultrashort laser processing techniques exploit high 0.11 m spatial resolution and almost unrestricted three-dimensional structuring capability. Adjustable pulse duration, spatiotemporal chirp, phase front tilt and polarization allow control of photomodication via uniquely wide parameter space. Mature opto-electrical/mechanical technologies have enabled laser processing speeds approaching meters-per-second, leading to a fast lab-to-fab transfer. The key aspects and latest achievements are reviewed with an emphasis on the fundamental relation between spatial resolution and total fabrication throughput. Emerging biomedical applications implementing micrometer feature precision over centimeter-scale scaffolds and photonic wire bonding in telecommunications are highlighted.

Light: Science & Applications (2016) 5, e16133; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133; published online 12 August 2016

Keywords: biomedical applications; direct laser writing; functional microdevices; material processing; nonlinear lightmatter interaction; 3D structuring; ultrashort laser pulses

UNIQUENESS OF ULTRAFAST LASER PROCESSINGThe possibility of three-dimensional (3D) writing in glass1 and polymers2 using tightly focused femtosecond (fs) laser pulses, demonstrated roughly two decades ago, has attracted attention in a wide range of areas related to academic research and engineering. The fabrication of 3D objects with a size comparable to that of a living cell and comprising even ner details3 suggests a realization of remotely controllable 3D micro-bots to perform in vivo healing missions or the creation of all-optical information processors integrated on a single 3D microchip and robust non-erasable optical memory structures. Thus began the race towards these and many other attractive goals. At present, most of those goals have yet to be reached; however, the progress achieved in some areas is signicant. Currently, optical memories with data density exceeding 1 Tbit cm3 (Refs. 4,5), waveguide-based optical information processing structures1, elements of optical quantum computing systems6,7, 3D photonic crystals (PhC)8 and micro-mechanical/biological systems9,10 are obtainable using ultrashort laser pulses. Here, we discuss these achievements and outline current trends in the development of laser processing and its

applications, which are bound to make ultrashort laser fabrication an indispensable tool for future nanotechnologies.

Unrestricted freeform manufacturing in 3D-space on the mesoscale spanning the critical dimensions of 10 nm to 100 m in feature sizes has been an engineering curiosity over the last 1015 years. Endless incarnations of micro-copies from real-world items were fabricated in a variety of photo-polymers, recorded in glasses and crystals. This endeavor pushed and explored the limits of novel 3D fabrication and experimented with optimization for a higher throughput and resolution11. The efforts continue to this day and challenge well-established benchmarks in resolution, feature size, precision and efciency developed over more than 50 years in the microelectronics industry. Comparison of 3D emerging technology with a mature two-dimensional (2D) micro-technology is only partially fair owing to a qualitative difference in the 3D character and the capability of laser manufacturing. Both approaches have fundamental limitations set by the wavelength of fabrication for electrons and photons, respectively. The difference in the relevant wavelengths is revealing: the electrons de Broglie wavelength at a typical V = 50 kV acceleration voltage in

1Laser Research Centre, Department of Quantum Electronics, Physics Faculty, Vilnius University, Saultekio Ave. 10, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania; 2Center for Optical Research and Education (CORE), Utsunomiya University, 7-1-2 Yoto, Utsunomiya 321-8585, Japan; 3Research Institute of Electronics, Shizuoka University, 3-5-3-1 Johoku, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu 432-8561, Japan; 4Centre for Micro-Photonics, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia;

5Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication, ANFF, 151 Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia and 6Center of Nanotechnology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: M Malinauskas, Email: mailto:[email protected]

Web End [email protected] ; S Juodkazis, Email: mailto:[email protected]

Web End [email protected] Received 7 January 2015; revised 4 March 2016; accepted 9 March 2016; accepted article preview online 14 March 2016

REVIEW

Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

2

q C0:055 (nonrelati

vistic), where h, e, m are the Planks constant, electron charge and mass, respectively, whereas the light wavelength l = 5000 (a green color) in 3D-laser writing.

Lasers entered and now dominate the elds of welding, drilling, cladding and manufacturing with a unique capability of 3D robotic light delivery at a 0.110 m scale and pointing stability of 1 mm (for example, in the car manufacturing industry) since circa 1980 (Ref. 12). Lasers operating at 1 or 10 m wavelengths and at long pulse or continuous-wave (cw) mode are practical and useful, yet unsuitable for fabrication tasks at scales smaller than 1 mm. Thus, they are presently challenged in precision and resolution by reliable ultrashort pulsed lasers. A double innovation in (i) the development of new materials and (ii) laser sources that are better suited for 3D micro-printing was required for the continued progress of laser fabrication and the long-praised resolution of fabrication not being the driving factor.

Now, with the emergence of a new generation of reliable fs-lasers, a set of new materials and backing by science of lightmatter interaction at the nanoscale with cross-sections smaller than 100 nm, miniaturization of 3D-laser fabrication is advancing and innovating. To demonstrate the versatility and potential of the new technology, 3D inscription, additive manufacturing and surface texturation techniques are shown to reach the high throughput required for industry. A selected few representative examples illustrate the capabilities and truly unique features of fs-laser fabrication.

IS FABRICATION USING ULTRAFAST LASERS A FUTURE TECHNOLOGY?

Industrial challengesManufacturing has its own conservative pace of development and justication of new investments. Considerable innovation that brings a new quality to the product simultaneously with higher productivity is always required for the next cycle of technological renovation, which occurs on a 710-year-modernization cycle on a factory oor. In manufacturing with lasers, their acquisition and maintenance costs, reliability and longevity were always the main driving forces for industrial installations. The innovation that an ultrashort pulsed laser can bring to manufacturing is discussed next from the perspective of unique control over the lightmatter interaction when ultrashort laser pulses are used and in view of the practical requirements of high productivity.

The additive manufacturing, cutting and welding with CO2, YAG and ber lasers that operate at 10 or 1 m wavelengths with a cw or pulsed-mode operation are already powering the automotive, construction and marking industries12. The feed speeds of a workpiece are 10 cm min1 (1 mm s1 or in specic cases even higher) for marking and welding applications realized with lasers with an average power of 0.11 kW. The target industrial macro-fabrication speed is 10 cm min1 for a linear scan, including turning points, which can already be demonstrated in fs-laser micro-fabrication13,14 with a recent

record in waveguide writing speed of 200 mm s1 (Ref. 15) on the screen of a mobile phone inside Gorilla glass. Another efcient and conned light delivery is a lament16 self-formed in water, which can assist in uniform energy delivery along the beam propagation direction17. This helps laser fabrication of curved surfaces where tight focusing would require axial position adjustments for precise matching of the focal region and the samples surface18. The principle of this approach is depicted in Figure 1. The formed lament can have a high aspect ratio (length to width) and experimentally realized more than 2 mm in length and just tens of micrometers in diameter13. When a

laser raster scan or multi-line exposure mode is used for a ll exposure of 3D volume of a workpiece/pattern, the fabrication time quickly increases to hours for an object with 3D cross-sections of 1 in.

The fastest available beam scan approach employs mechanical galvo-scanners that can deect the beam even faster than 10 m s1.

However, such high-speed scanning is achievable only for linear structures. When turning tight corners, acceleration becomes a serious issue. The acousto-optical device-based deector enables increased beam scanning velocities up to 2 m s1 with no inherent limitations on a turn radius maintaining high positioning repeatability19. In addition, powerful laser sources can be used for parallel multibeam20 fabrication as well as employing passive21 or active beam shaping techniques22. Such implementations dramatically increase fabrication throughput. Recently, tomographic data were used as a master CAD model for laser 3D fabrication23, an approach adopted from 3D printing.

Fs-laser fabrication have application where high precision is required, where structuring of the surface and bulk of transparent materials that are brittle and hard must be performed. If composite and layered materials must be structured in a complicated 3D fashion, it can be performed by fs-laser structuring. This has been understood from the basics of lightmatter interaction in which pulses shorter than the energy relaxation between electrons and lattice ions can deliver energy with the highest precision and without plasma screening/reection effects2426.

Scaling from 2D to 3DBecause high precision and small feature size are incompatible with large-throughput fabricationTennants law27and by following the universal trend of miniaturization, we expect future applications for fs-laser manufactured structures and objects to be used in smaller-footprint lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab-on-a-chip devices have typical dimensions of 1 1 cm2 and feature sizes of the functional elements such as channels and optical elements on the order of a cross-section of an optical ber (a human hair) of 100 m. At this already challenging scale, the surface nishing and smallest structures should be controlled at /20 nm precision/resolution for optical functionality.

Fs-laser sources at 501000 kHz repetition rates and average power up to 10 W for a typical wavelength 1 m and pulse duration p200 fs have reached an industrial grade in terms of reliability and capability of fabrication at the required 10 cm min1 workpiece feed rates. Tennants law linking the resolution, R (nm) and the

electron beam lithography is le hmv

h2 2emV

a b

Focus Filament

Focus

Water

Figure 1 Beam focusing approaches: (a) a beam is focused on the surface or volume of a material; (b) an fs-beam is focused on liquid and forms a light lament suitable for processing of transparent and opaque workpieces at different axial locations or curvature of the surface. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 13. JLPS. All rights reserved.

Light: Science & Applications doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

3

throughput, T2D (m2 h1) of fabrication via a planar lithography predicts the following scaling27:

T2D R=2:3

5 or Resolution 2:3

5 Throughputp

1

Following the arguments of scaling, for a 3D fabrication via lithographic approach, one could expect T3D R=2:3

52=3

or R 2:3T0:33D

with T3D (m3 h1), which follows from area-to-volume scaling. However, Tennants law is for the 2D fabrication; for the production of 3D objects, we use a more general expression R C T0:33D, where value of C = 32.2 is taken to pin the power plot

(Figure 2) to the natural throughput of protein production in a 3D conformation by a ribosome; the resolution (often referred to but not to be mixed up with the individual feature size) is taken as 1 nm. This C value corresponds to the production rate of 20 amino acids per second in a cell30. It is noteworthy that this comparison of direct writing used in fabricationfor example, building 3D objects by laser polymerization28 or glass structuring29is valid because ribosome is also constructing 3D proteins from a linear code30. Another measure of the 3D production rate can be made from the growth rate of cells. Human nails grow at a 1 nm s1 linear speed, which means3.6 m3 h1, and is similar to the protein production rate.

Figure 2 shows typical Resolution Throughput regions marked by

ovals for the manipulation of single atoms by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), writing by oxidation of SiO2 with an atomic force microscope (AFM) needle, standard electron beam (EBL) and optical mask projection lithographies. These are 2D technologies that obey Tennants scaling T2D = (R/2.3)5, which is a pure empirical dependence. Interestingly, starting from the current 22-nm node of modern complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) lithography, the eld transistor design allows the exertion of 3D control of the depletion regions in the channel. Hence, the future of planar 2D technology tends to become 3D functional as the feature size is reduced31. Apparently, for the 3D case (Figure 2), direct laser writing by polymerization28 and volume Bragg gratings formed by axially extended BesselGauss fs-beam14 delivers a 3D nished and functional structure. For example, direct laser writing with fs-laser pulses delivers 3D fabrication of 103 m3 s1 with focal spot size d = 1.22/NA

for 3D structuring of silicone elastomer28,32; here, NA is the numerical

aperture of the objective lens. On the Resolution Throughput plot (Figure 2), the corresponding 3D fabrication examples tend to cluster towards the desirable lower-right side of the lines representing Tennants law for the 3D case. This shows that for 3D-laser fabrication, the throughput can meet industrial standard at the required resolution for 3D manufacturing.

ULTRAFAST LASER LITHOGRAPHYThe trend of miniaturization, which began in CMOS electronics, is currently spreading to other areas, such as micro-optics, micro-uidics and micro-mechanics. In these elds, new functionalities of micro-and nanostructures stem from physical or chemical responses arising because of size and shape-related effects and, in the case of optical systems, benet from enhanced interactions between light and matter in articially structured media. Perhaps the most intuitively appealing examples of such applications are optically controlled mechanical phenomenafor example, laser trappingwhich rely on opto-mechanical susceptibility of microscopic particles and structures to optically generated minute forces and torques. Other rapidly evolving areas are optics of plasmonic nanoparticles and PhCs, which enable control over light emission, absorption and propagation at the nanoscale, a demand strongly stimulated by the need for green and sustainable use of energy and materials. Below, we will mainly focus on the structuring of dielectrics and their new optical, mechanical and biomedical functionalities.

Requirements for surface qualityMicro- and nanofabrication of optical structures requires surface roughness o/20, (20 40 nm for visible wavelengths) to reduce random light scattering. Although this requirement can be in some cases alleviated by post-fabrication treatmentfor example, controlled remelting, lapping and polishing of microscale objectsit still remains a difcult task. Therefore, the fabrication techniques capable of directly delivering the required quality are essentially preferred. In this respect, the potential of fs-laser lithography has been demonstrated many times, and some examples will be given in the sections below. In general, the surface quality of laser-fabricated optical elements is high enough to enable their direct use in photonic applications.

Materials and processing techniquesOwing to the requirements of high surface quality and low random scattering, laser fabrication of optical micro- and nanostructures prefers nondestructive photomodication processes over optical breakdown or other destructive processes. Therefore, liquid photo-curable organic resins and negative-tone photoresists are mainly used as initial materials for direct laser writing (DLW) lithography. In these materials, optical absorption induces photochemical reactions, such as photopolymerization (curing). In liquid resins, this process leads to liquid-to-solid transition, whereas in photoresistswhich in most cases are exposed as dry, solidied lmsphotomodication has a latent character. After the laser structuring, unexposed liquid resin is rinsed away, whereas unexposed resist is dissolved in a developer and removed from the structure. Finally, the rinse liquid is dried; this is a critical step for nely patterned, fragile structures, because they may become completely destroyed by powerful capillary forces. These undesired effects can be suppressed by the use of freeze-drying or critical-point drying techniques to eliminate the surface tension effects33,34.

104

103

102

101

100

101

106 104 102 100 102 104 106 108 1010

Throughput, T (m2 h1 for 2D; m3 h1 for 3D)

DLW 2015

Low resolution Low productivity

Ribosome

STM

Polymerization ref.[21]

Glass

Ripples[22]

[10]

Optical

[afii9838] light

Resolution, (nm)

3D

22 nm node

Nanotechnology

EBL AFM

2D

High resolution High productivity

Figure 2 Tennants scaling: state-of-the-art of nanotechnology in 2003 for the resolution vs. throughput R = 2.35 T2D (Ref. 27). Direct 3D laser writing for polymerization28 with T 109 m3 h1, Bragg grating recording by BesselGauss fs-beam in glass14, surface ripple formation on crystals/

glasses29 are marked along with the Tennants law predictions rescaled for the 3D C 106 m3 h1 with C = 32.2 taken from the speed of protein production in ribosome30 (see text for details). The size of elliptical markers is representative of the resolution span; the current 22 nm node of modern CMOS lithography is marked by an arrow.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Light: Science & Applications

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

4

Historically, liquid resins were the rst materials to show potential for 3D-laser structuring2,3537, but later negative-tone photoresists

became widely used owing to their higher stability during processing and lower post-drying shrinkage. Among photoresists, epoxy-based chemically amplied photoresist SU-8 has acquired wide popularity8,3840, because this resist, specically intended for micro-fabrication of mechanical components via ultraviolet lithography, was already commercially available during the early steps of development of 3D-laser lithography. SU-8 is optically transparent in visible and infrared (IR) spectral ranges, but can be exposed via two-photon and multi-photon absorption, ensures submicron resolution, has a refractive index 1.5, and is mechanically strong and biocompatible.

Numerous demonstrations of micro- and nano-photonic structures for example, 3D PhCsfabricated in SU-8 can be found in the literature41,42.

Subsequently, new classes of photoresists specic for laser lithography were developed, aiming to further improve spatial resolution, simplify post-processing and reduce drying-related shrinkage. A class of photoresists based on a zirconium propoxide solgel43 developed by a collaboration of several groups offers signicantly improved spatial resolution, low proximity effect (thin threads that evolve randomly and uncontrollably between closely spaced larger features) and low shrinkage44. This is achieved by combining organic and inorganic components and various modications of this hybrid material, also known as SZ2080, which were synthesized to target specic purposes for example, assisting subsequent metallization by the inclusion of metal-binding moieties45 and the improvement of spatial resolution by inclusion of mobile quenching molecules46. Tuning proportions of photoresist components, such as glass-forming silica, zirconia, titania and methylmetacrylate plastic-like moieties allow a exible choice of mechanical and optical properties of micro-optical elements47,48. In

addition to SZ2080, a line of IP resists developed by and available commercially from Nanoscribe GmbH49 offers similar advantages for ultrafast laser structuring. IP photoresists also include liquid photo-resists, which can simultaneously act as an index-matching liquid during the DLW process and has enabled the achievement of structures with extremely large heights50. Because swelling and shrinkage during development and drying is inherent to negative-tone photoresists33,5153, shrinkage effects can be signicantly suppressed by using positive-tone resists borrowed from the semiconductor industry54,55; however, in this case, the total exposed (to be removed) volume may increase, and the fabrication time may lengthen somewhat in the case of sequential DLW processes. Photosensitivity of photoresists and resins was conventionally tailored by adding

photoinitiators to these materials. Recently, careful control over spectral and temporal characteristics of fs-laser pulses has enabled precise control over photo-excitation via multi-photon and avalanche ionization as well as by controlling the thermal conditions at the focal volume inside a pure resist. A combination of high pre-breakdown irradiance and fast scanning opens the possibility to tame chemical-free radical creation and their thermal cross-linking without the necessity of a photoinitiator11,56. Coincidentally, initiator-free cross-linking in silicone28 has produced biocompatible material free of the bio-toxic cyclic compounds present in most photoinitiators. Strongly 3D-localized thermal curing of resists57,58 can now be widely explored

for microfabrication owing to their fast scan capabilities.

With regard to fabrication techniques, the two main methods are holographic fabrication2022 and DLW5964. Holographic fabrication exploits nondestructive exposure of a material to a periodic interference eld of several coherent laser pulses, and can be implemented using a simple opto-mechanical setup and a wide variety of amplied and unamplied laser sources. Various implementations of DLW are described in the available literature11,6567, and DLW setups are

commercially available from several companies49,6870. Among the

current developments in the practical implementation of the DLW technique is a signicant increase of the laser beam scan speed in the sample from 100 m s1 toward meters-per-second achieved via the combined use of fast mechanics for sample translation and scanning of the beam focus inside the sample9,71,72. Special exposure schemes

tailored to improve the axial resolution of DLW can also be added7375.

For exposure of photoresist or resin samples, fs-laser oscillators (for example, Ti:sapphire or ber laser systems) provide sufcient exposure levels. The wide availability and constantly decreasing size and price of these laser sources contribute to the practical applicability of the DLW technique. For exploitation of the DLW technique near or above the laser-induced breakdown threshold in solid crystals or glasses (for example, for waveguide writing and creation of new materials), amplied laser systems providing pulse energies 41 J are required.

Next to lithography, the fs-laser irradiation can be very similarly applied for processing of fused silica (the amorphous form of SiO2)

and introduces a novel technology platform for highly integrated all-optical microsystems. In contrast with common approaches that rely on combining materials to achieve particular functions, fs-laser-fabricated microsystems rely on single material monolith, whose properties are locally and 3D functionalized by selective exposure. The combination of functionalized zones with different physical properties allows integration of systems without the need for further assembly of packaging steps or without the need for multiple processing steps, like for instance sequences of layers deposition, exposure and etching steps (Figure 3; Ref. 76). Lastly, there is numerous other additive (and subtractive) manufacturing approaches where ultrashort pulses have signicant advantages over longer pulses. To mention a few techniques like laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) or an intense eld-induced self assembly are not reviewed here; see Refs. 77, 78 for the detailed account.

3D micro-optical elementsAspherical and axicon micro-lenses as well as diffractive optical elements were DLW fabricated directly on the core of the optical ber7981, illustrating the potential of the technique to integrate various components. Figure 4 shows an example of such optical elements fabricated in photoresist SZ2080. Spiral waveplates59,82 for

optical vortex generation (Figure 5) and hybrid refractive-diffractive elements blending diffraction gratings and lenses can be made83.

400 m

Figure 3 A cross-pivot hinge out of fused silica as a part of a mechanical structure. The images show the three crossed beams and the rounded corners at the location where the beams are connected to the main body. Note the high aspect ratio of the micromachining process. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 76. MDPI. All rights reserved.

Light: Science & Applications doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

5

a b c

Lenses: Conical

Aspherical

Lens

Pillar

Pillar

50 m 30 m

Fiber core

Optical fiber

50 m

Figure 4 Freeform 3D micro-optical elements fabricated by DLW: hybrid optical elementsaspheric and axicon lenses on a tip of optical ber. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 81. JLPS. All rights reserved.

Scan

a b

1 m 1 m

c

Height (m)

8

6

4

2

1

2

3

4

1 2 3 4

Top view

0 5 10 15 20

Cross section (m)

Figure 5 Optical vortex generating spiral waveplates. Smaller (a, b) and larger (c) cross-sections optical vortex generators. (a, b) SEM images of micro-plates made by point-by-point exposure (inset in b shows 3D construction of irradiation matrix). (c) Height scans at four locations of the step edge of the spiral plate; diameter of the plate was 60 m. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 59. Copyright (2010), AIP Publishing LLC.

p

A rapidly growing eld of singular optics exploring the generation and control of optical vortices at a microscale benets from DLW via polymerization owing to a simple method to achieve 100%

efciency of the optical vortex generation. Alternatively, planar patterns for the vortex generationq-platesare made of azimuthally patterned form birefringence inside glass by fs-laser structuring84,85;

however, they suffer from scattering losses.

It is helpful to stress here that these structures clearly satisfy the high surface quality requirements outlined in the section above and are directly usable. It has been already proved by several studies that there is no shape limitation or restriction of a single element in an array of micro-lenses8688. Obviously, surface quality and optical characteristics of these elements can be retained during their replicationfor example by nanoimprint, hot embossing and moldingdirectly or via an Ni-shim replication89,90. Recently, integration of 2D and 3D optical components comprising both passive and active functionalities namely, a rectangular waveguide of rectangular cross-section that can be /2-twisted to form an arch on the substratewas demonstrated91. Thus, the application of ultrashort laser processing can lead to realization of new optical integrated devices with novel functionalities such as optouidic single-cell counters10. Interestingly, by applying different exposure doses, one can achieve 3D or 2D

varying material properties, thus producing monolithic components with composite properties92. This seems to be an attractive option for producing custom-made freeform gradient refractive index micro-optical elements93.

One of the primary application areas of ultrafast laser lithography in photoresists and resins has been the fabrication of PhC structures94101,

especially 3D ones that are difcult or impossible to realize by other available techniques. 3D PhCs with woodpile41,102, spiral103,104,

slanted-pore105 and other architectures64,106 with high optical quality were demonstrated during the last decade. Figure 6 summarizes the structural and optical properties of a 3D woodpile architecture PhC fabricated in SZ2080 photoresist by DLW and dried in supercritical CO2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images shown in Figure 6(a) demonstrate the DLW fabrication of highly resolved features, evident from woodpile rods with lateral thickness of ~ axy = 135 nm.

The in-plane lattice period (distance between two neighboring woodpile rods), designed to be 1000 nm, is in reality reduced to 940 nm owing to shrinkage of ~ 5% of the PhC lattice. Shrinkage by a similar amount is also evident in the large-scale SEM image in Figure 6(a). The distance between the neighboring woodpile planes is designed to be az

2

=4axy to maintain a face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice symmetry.

PhC structures with similar parameters were unexpectedly found to exhibit strong resonant reection at visible wavelengths, although neither fundamental nor higher-order photonic stopgaps (PSG) are expected to open in this spectral range owing to a fairly large PhC lattice period. Figure 6(b) shows optical image of several fcc woodpile structures similar to that in Figure 6(a), having lattice periods axy varying in small steps and fabricated at different average powers of the writing laser beam. Observation in reection mode within an angular incidence range of 17 clearly reveals the structural color of the PhC structures. The color exhibits redshift with increasing lattice period and writing laser power (that is, dielectric lling ratio) in qualitative agreement with Maxwells scaling behavior107, thus indicating that its origin is linked to the periodicity of the PhC. Figure 6(c) summarizes the interpretation of the structural color by comparing the experimental reectivity spectrum of the PhC structure in Figure 6(a) with the reectivity spectrum and photonic band diagram simulated using the nite-difference time-domain technique. As can be seen, a fundamental PSG opens along the observation (woodpile layer stacking) direction near the 1400 nm wavelength in the only PSG and results in a near-IR reectivity band, whereas the visible reectivity band occurring near the 700 nm wavelength spectrally overlaps with nearly horizontal segments of some high-photonic bands characterized by low group velocity.

Accordingly, resonant backscattering should be associated with coupling losses between incident plane waves and slow-light modes inside the PhC107. Exploitation of high-photonic band dispersion

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Light: Science & Applications

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

6

a

a b

z

220 nm

100 nm 65 nm

1 m

x y

Depletion power

10 m

c

d

b

Lattice period

Wall

Laser

power

500 nm 4 m

Figure 7 (a) A typical DLW STED exposure prole: red volume represents standard focusing exciting the material; green represents a phase mask-generated depletion (bottle beam); violet is the resulting modied volume (excitation is minimized by cutting the side and top-bottom lobes with a shaped depletion beam)73. (b) Using the same excitation conditions but increasing the depletion power, the feature size shrinks (from left to right, it is minimized from 220 nm down to 65 nm)73. (c, d) Magnied and full-scale image of 3D chiral polarizer structure fabricated employing simultaneous combination of dip-in50 and STED techniques111. Reproduced with permission from Refs. 73, 111. OSA. All rights reserved.

c

1.5 1.5

1 1

[afii9838]c = 700 nm

Experiment

FDTD simulation

Normalized frequency

Normalized frequency

[afii9838]c = 1400 nm

0.5

0.5

0 0 0

0.5

X

Reflectivity Wave vector

Figure 6 Coloration via slowing light. (a) SEM image of 3D woodpile architecture PhC in photoresist SZ2080, (b) optical microscopy image of several woodpile structures having different lattice parameters and exhibiting different structural color, (c) comparison between experimental optical reectivity spectrum of the sample shown in a and numerically simulated reectivity spectrum as well as photonic band diagram. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 94. JLPS. All rights reserved.

allows realization of PhC-based structural color materials without the need to downscale their lattice period. Slow-light regions are promising for sensors owing to their increased lightmatter interaction.

Ultimate feature size vs. resolutionThe latest advances in nonlinear polymerization-based laser structuring reveal that it is not the exposure conditions but the reacting material itself that is a real limiting factor for the ultimate resolution108. First, one should clearly distinguish the difference between the feature size and the resolutionin other words, dimensions of a single feature and resolved separate features109. Although

nonlinear light-matter interaction-induced modication volume can be squeezed down to tens of nanometers by reducing the applied laser

intensity (the exposure dose), it is not very helpful for ensuring scale-down of the resolution110,111. The fabricated structure is revealed by using wet development; the tiny volumes of cross-linked material tend to shrink and become even smaller. Hence, this minimizes the polymerized feature size but hardly improves the resolution.

The stimulated emission depletion (STED) technique, well established in multi-photon microscopy112, can be implemented to improve both the features size and the resolution, as shown in Figure 7a and 7b. STED-inspired lithography relies on simultaneous photo-induced activation and deactivation of the polymerization process.

The ultrafast excitation pulse drives the photoinitiator molecules to a long-lived intermediate state that initiates polymerization on a relatively slow timescale. A second laser is employed to quench this intermediate to the ground state, preventing polymerization. By spatial beam shaping, the photomodication can be conned to a well-subdiffraction-limited small region. This research vector was extensively studied by several research groups; M. Wegeners and T. Klars are among the most active. Their results proved that the feature size can be more conned by optimizing the material for that purpose and applying a dual exposure: an ultrafast excitation and inhibition113.

Experimentally realized arrangements including phase masks for specic beam shaping are already described in detail elsewhere111,114.

Most importantly, it was shown that this approach empowers dramatic improvement of not only the lateral but also the axial resolution115. This progress makes the DLW lithography technique even more attractive and versatile for the manufacturing of state-ofthe-art photonic as well as biological components116. Despite these achievements, the topic of achievable resolution and feature size remains actively debated with the main arguments focused on the mechanisms of polymerization and its kinetics117120.

Light: Science & Applications doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

7

VOLUMETRIC STRUCTURING OF DIELECTRICSThe unique 3D capability of fs-laser writing is overviewed next for the creation of new materials and strategic elds of telecommunications121,122 and various biomedical applications22,23,71,72.

Creation of new materials via extreme pressure and temperature conditionsWith tight focusing and concentration of light into a small submicron focal spot and by using ultrashort laser pulses p100 fs, the intensity reaches several terawatts per square centimeter for small-energy

Ep100 nJ pulses. For such pulses, self-focusing can be avoided because the pulse power Ep/p 1 MW/pulse is below the self-focusing threshold inside the dielectric and semiconductor materials;

however, the intensity can already surpass the dielectric breakdown threshold.

In multiple ionized plasma and under strongly nonlinear dynamics of electrons and ions in abrupt pressure and temperature gradients, separation of the ions of different masses occurs123,124. After the

microexplosion, strong thermal quenching facilitates the recovery of metastable phases of materials. Some of those phases are high-pressure and temperature nanomaterials previously only predicted by modeling. The creation of molecular oxygen in glasses125; change of the ionic makeover of complex compounds such as one of the Earths most abundant minerals, olivine126; xation of highly unstable amorphous phase of sapphire127; and formation and recovery of body-centered cubic-Al inside sapphire, which requires pressures such as in the Earths center128, are recent illustrative examples.

When a light pulse is squeezed to tens of fs and focused into volumes with cross-sections of sub-wavelength dimensions (hundreds of nanometers) and absorbed at an even smaller volume where dielectric breakdown is created, the energy density reaches levels encountered in the strongest military macro-explosions. A phenomenal scale span over which a hydrodynamical stage of the explosion can be modeled is shown at energies 1021 times lower, and time scales are reduced by a factor of 107, creating the same Energy/Volume density129. At such exotic p, T conditions, defects inside glasses and crystals can be easily created at large densities5,130132. Such strongly

altered regions have different chemical etchability in acidic133,134 and

basic135 solutions now widely used for micro-uidics, structural analysis of the micro-/nanostructure of the interaction volume and fabrication of 3D micro-parts in silica and sapphire.

Temporal and spatial chirp control allows additional tunability of lightmatter interaction of focused ultrashort laser pulses136139.

Interestingly, a new metal welding technology based on a spark discharge uses an fs-laser-guide for pointing and chirp control of ionization. This is an example of an industrial process in which subtle parameters of fs-laser pulses are at work. Welding of previously incompatible materials, glasses, ceramics and metals with very different thermal expansion coefcients becomes possible using ultrafast lasers140,141.

The generation of a white light continuum using fs-laser pulses in water has proved to result in size homogenization of colloidal nanoparticles made by ablation in water142. For example, such colloidal suspensions of Au nanoparticles are stable in time against precipitation without surfactant additives and nds increasing popularity in biomedical sensing because of the pure Au surface accessible for functionalization143.

Passive and active waveguidesWaveguiding regions can be made by direct laser writing inside transparent materials. The guiding occurs in the augmented refractive

index locations n = n0+|n|, which can be created by stress-induced modications, defects or densication; n0 is an unperturbed refractive index of the medium. A fast thermal quenching important for the waveguide recording can be exploited in fs-laser writing. Glass structures typical for the elevated temperatures can be frozen along the written track. A so-called ctive temperature of glass corresponds to the particular glass morphology. In some glasses such as silica, the anomalous behavior is observed when denser phase corresponds to the higher temperature. For silica, the largest refractive index (a mass density) is at Tdense = 1500 C125. If waveguide writing conditions are chosen such that the recorded track has a ctive temperature close to

Tdense, a waveguide can be formed by fast quenching. Moreover, the waveguiding region does not exert compressive stress to surrounding regions as in most glasses and crystalline materials where the recorded track is expanded and is not waveguiding. The lowest loss waveguiding has been demonstrated in a tempered Gorilla glass15. In crystals, formation of strongly localized stress allows birefringence to be engineered144 into patterns that can efciently guide light145.

Waveguides written by fs-laser processing performs interferometry and quantum computing and is integrated into microuidic chips7.

Chip-integrated optical lanterns fabricated by fs-DLW are demonstrated for transfer of the focal plane image of large optical instruments such as telescopes onto CCD or spectrometer slits with preservation of phase information146,147 with spectral ltering cap

ability via laser-written Bragg gratings148,149. This is achieved via a

calculation of the 3D trajectory of the waveguide, which maintains the same length and does not approach other waveguides to avoid crosstalk. To maintain coherence from the image plane to the detector array, single-mode waveguides are fabricated. This newly emerging eld is branded as astrophotonics150. Active laser-written waveguides have been demonstrated at exotic wavelengths and in a small-footprint glass pieces151 for future on-chip and lab-in-ber integration152.

One of the most recent and promising practical advances of 3D-laser writing is emerging in the eld of photonic wire bonding (PWB)122 illustrated in Figure 8. This approach solves issues regarding the connection of silicon photonic circuits made on semiconductor-on-insulator (SOI) industrial platforms to multicore bers or lasers by DLW 3D lithography and offers novel concept solutions applicable to chip-scale interconnection. Altogether, this induces a dramatic increase of possibilities for the continuously growing telecommunication industry153. Here, 3D-laser-written waveguiding structures can be seen to be serving as wires in former microelectronic circuitry, a very logical step when circuits become photonic instead of electrical.

TOWARDS PRINTING BIO-PARTS AND SMART IMPLANTSThe 3D printing of bio-parts154, food and even houses is a ction quickly becoming a reality. The principles of stereolithography (3D fabrication) with light scanned over an absorbing surface of resin that is refreshed constantly as the workpiece is moved in the liquid are now taken forward and cross-pollinated with ideas of jet printing and silkography mastered in the solar cell industry. For the mass production of items larger than 1 mm, those new technologies are presenting what could be considered a disruptive technology155; that

is, they are very simple with a setup acquisition and maintenance cost up to two orders of magnitude smaller than fs-laser-based tools. Indeed, simple light sources or thermally controlled extrusion through a nozzle with a diameter of tens of micrometers is already delivering fascinating 3D fabrication of biodegradable tissue scaffolds and can prototype larger workpieces156for example, benchtop optic holders. In Figure 2, this would correspond to 100 m resolution and high

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Light: Science & Applications

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

8

productivity 1012 m3 h1 near the line corresponding to the 3D scaling by Tennants law.

Figure 9 illustrates the versatility of DLW and the compatibility of different materials that can be combined, exposed and developed for the nal 3D complex scaffolds. All materials are transparent with slightly different refractive indexes, helping with the recognition of the earlier fabricated regions in such multiplexed patterns. The control of surface chemistry, wettability and mechanical properties on the mesoscale (from tens of nanometers to tens of micrometers) is

currently an active eld of research for bio-scaffolds154,157,158. DLW

control of the volume fraction of a polymer in a 3D structure not only changes its permeability but also provides a method to deliver matching mechanical strength of implant and tissue via fracture toughness engineering159.

Despite strong competition in 3D fabrication among the different approaches discussed above, a high-precision laser structure will have unique advantages for high-precision scaffold formation where different materials must be combined (Figure 9) or high-resolution

a

b

Photonic wire bond (PWB)

PWB

Four-corefiber Tapers

SOI waveguide

SOI chip

Common carrier

50 m

20 m

Step for height adaption

c

d

PWB

PWB

Chip 1

SOI waveguides

10 m

Chip 2

Figure 8 PWB by the 3D DLW lithography approach121,122. (a) A principal scheme of the PWB enabling connection of an SOI chip with an optical ber.

(b) A four-core optical ber coupled with SOI waveguides by tapered photonic wires. (c) An integrated chip with two SOI waveguides coupled together via freeform PWB; note a spatial (lateral) displacement of the SOI waveguides on the separate chips. (d) An example of 3D PWB capability enabling virtually direct signal transferring through different communication platforms. Images courtesy of Prof. C. Koos. (2015) IEEE. Reprinted, with permission, from Ref. 122.

SZ2080 +2% Irg SZ2080 + 1% Irg

SZ2080 + 1% Irg

SZ2080 + 1% Irg AKRE + 1% Irg

PEG-DA-700 +1% Irg

PEG-DA-700 + 1% Irg

SZ2080

OrmoClear

OrmoClear

PEG-DA-700 +2% Irg

PEG-DA-700+1% Irg

250 m 100 m

10 m

100 m

Figure 9 Hybridization of scaffolds made out of different negative-tone photoresists (color-coded for clarity): AKREred, SZ2080gray, PEG-DA-700blue, Ormocleargreen. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 18. JLPS. All rights reserved.

Light: Science & Applications doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

9

feature size patterns160,161 are required. Functioning of the cell

membrane receptors for opening drug delivery pathways occurs via 3D morphological changes on the membrane on the scale of tens of nanometers162. Currently, this is the resolution achievable by DLW lithography in 3D40 and can be combined with standard nanotechnology methods. Bio-related research for understanding fundamental mechanisms on the sub-cellular level will require the highest resolution of laser writing.

On a larger than cellular scale, the biomedical eld is actively researching facile methods for fabrication of macro-3D scaffolds (Figure 10). Recently, a preclinical study of 3D articial micro-structured scaffolds out of hybrid material SZ2080 fabricated using the DLW technique was reported154. The created centimeter-scale membrane constructs were tested both in vitro by pre-growing isolated allogeneic rabbit chondrocytes and in vivo by implantation into rabbit organisms for up to 6 months (followed by ex vivo characterization) (Figure 11). Using a surgical drill, 54 bilateral osteochondral defects with a 3 mm diameter were created. Weight-bearing areas of medial femoral condyles were chosen for a preclinical study. Ex vivo histological examination shows that specic 3D pore geometry and pre-growth of chondrocytes before implantation signicantly improved the performance of the manufactured scaffolds. The achieved biocompatibility was comparable to collagen membranes widely used in surgery. A successful outcome of the study supports the idea to implement DLW into clinical practice for fabricating patient-specic 3D micro-structured scaffolds that, in combination with cell seeding, may be a signicant advance in cartilage tissue regeneration.

In addition, it can serve as a tool for generating prototype scaffolds of bio-inspired microarchitectures, and their characterization of mechanical properties required for both hard (bone and cartilage) and soft (muscle, skin, etc.) tissue engineering163. Recent studies show that by employing the fs-DLW technique, biocompatible and biodegradable materials such as silk can be 3D structured164.

Printing via LIFT has already been advanced as a technological solution for the fabrication of microelectronic circuitry165, and is applicable for the transfer of biomaterials with low damage when ultrashort laser pulses are used. The printing tape principle is applied to form light-absorbing lm with functional materials facing the substrate onto which it will be transferred. When ultrashort laser pulses are used, the transfer gaps can be larger, and more directional LIFT is performed owing to the efcient and spatially well-controlled energy deposition166.

Apart from 3D printing by laser-assisted processing and LIFT, ultrashort laser applications in surgery is another vast eld with huge potential. Very precise energy delivery in eye surgery167 and focusing

through a turbid medium using spatiotemporal focusing168 are just a

few examples in which unique control over the delivery of ultrashort laser pulses to the modication/surgery point can be exercised.

Direct write additive manufacturing processes are unique in exibility yet inherit the underlying limitation of being time consuming owing to the serial nature of point-by-point structuring169. The

current development of fs-pulsed industrial high-repetition-rate lasers limits the DLW technique by either an efcient sample positioning or beam scanning for high-throughput manufacturing. Recently, a continuous generation of monolithic polymeric parts was demonstrated using stereolithography-based 3D printing, which is believed to allow print manufacturing of parts in minutes instead of hours170. The

control of the polymerization mechanism using an oxygen-permeable membrane is responsible for faster 3D printing by up to two orders of magnitude.

COMPLEX LIGHT FIELDSExperimental studies have shown that complex 3D microstructures can be polymerized by multiple foci created and translated by a holographic spatial light modulator (SLM)171 and can be exploited up

to the diffraction-limited spatial resolution172. This enables efcient

1 cm

1 mm

Figure 10 Free (not attached to substrate) macro-3D scaffolds out of SZ2080. Fabrication time 2.5 h/piece with 515 nm/300 fs direct write at 7 mm s1 sample translation synchronized with beam scanning154.

2 weeks

in vitro

1 month

ex vivo

3 month

ex vivo

Control Collagen membrane (CM)

CM with chondrocytes

SZ2080 SZ2080 with chondrocytes

Figure 11 First in vivo tests of laser-fabricated scaffold154. SEM images of a segment of centimeter-scale membrane tested in vitro by pre-growing isolated allogeneic rabbit chondrocytes for 2 weeks; scale bar 100 m. Ex vivo photo images after implantation of laser-fabricated 3D scaffold pre-incubated with chondrocytes and implanted into rabbits knee (marked by arrow) after 1 and 3 months; 54 bilateral osteochondral defects 3 mm in diameter were created using a surgical drill at the weight-bearing areas. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 154. IOP. All rights reserved.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Light: Science & Applications

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

10

SLM1 CCD

image sensor

DM OL sample

generation of up to 10 independent foci for parallel holographic fs DLW. Currently, a common SLM ensures a 60 Hz refresh rate, but it can be further increased by the application of faster modulators that are commercially available (200 Hz) with even higher rates expected in the near future173.

When SLM is too slow for an application, an optical element can be made for a specic phase pattern required for laser fabrication. Recently, for material processing using fs Airy beams, such an optical element was made in glass by a form-birefringent pattern174. Airy beams are

advantageous for glass scribing, cutting and complex edge and corner formation on a workpiece. With the Airy beam scribing and glass-breaking, a spontaneous self-detachment of a ber-like structure was induced, offering an alternative way to fabricate glass cantilevers174.

Development of beam shaping is leading to solutions in which simultaneous control of timing, positioning, phase and polarization of the one or several laser pulses is performed. Surface or bulk modication of transparent materials becomes less distinct in the case of high-intensity ultrashort laser pulses. High intensity can be created inside the material at its optical transparency window as well as in subsurface regions. By creating a high-density electronic excitation, a newly introduced interface then acts as a transient meta-surface that responds to different parameters of the incoming light: polarization, spatial and temporal chirp, ponderomotive action at high intensity and angular momentum of the beam.

Nanotexturing by polarization controlIn many cases, it is already proven that peak intensity is a more important parameter than the total energy dose for the required modication. The inuence of other parameters, however, can also be very importantfor example, the polarization is actively studied in control of ablation and formation of (nano-)ripples.

The structuring of materials by ultrashort laser pulses demonstrated new morphologies in nanotexturing of the surface and volume by self-organized quasi-periodic structuresripples29,84,175,176. Photo-

excitation of electron-hole solid-state as well as breakdown plasmas are leading to the formation of sub-wavelength period ripples via imprint of a surface wave on the substrateplasma interface. A surface wave on a plasma is created when the real part of dielectric permittivity o n2, where n is the refractive index of the dielectric medium and a phase matching between the surface wave and the k-vector of photons is met. Because the TM-mode with E-eld polarized in the plane of incidence (p-polarization) is the most efcient in launching the surface wave, most of the observed ripples on the surface have an orientation perpendicular to the E-eld (or a wave vector k of the ripple-grating is parallel to E). Hence, polarization becomes one of the key control parameters for surface and in-volume formation of ripples, which is shown next for the case of arbitrary and simultaneous control of several beamlets.

Dynamic real-time beam shapingThe polarization and wave front tilt control provides a way to manipulate surface nanotexturing and ripple formation. Figure 12 shows a method to prepare arbitrary polarization, including vectorial beams using SLMs and polarizing optics: /4 and /2 quarter- and half-waveplates QWP and HWP, respectively169. The polarization of the output beam Eout is given:

Eout Q

p4SbH

CGH1

CGH2

PC

HWP

L

L

L

L Fs laser

LIR cut filter

M

HL

SLM2

QWP L

P

L

Front tilt

Polarization

1 mm

Reconstruction

500 mm

300 nm 300 nm

Polarization direction Polarization direction

Figure 12 Optical setup with two SLMs for independent control of the wave front tilt and polarization. HWP, QWP and SLM phase masks allows an arbitrary control of the polarization and wave front tilt. SEM images of the single-pass scan ablation of indium tin oxide with adjacent lines polarized differently. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 169. Taylor & Francis Ltd, http://www.tandfonline.com

Web End =http://www.tandfonline.com . All rights reserved.

2 where Ein is the Jones vector of the linearly polarized input beam, the subscripts H and Q are the azimuthal angles of the respective HWP

and QWP plates, and , are the phase retardation applied to the pair of SLMs, respectively. The wave front and polarization of the output beam are independently controlled by choosing and . For 3D fabrication, SLMs74,177 are also useful for compensation of

aberrationsin particular, sphericaldue to a refractive index mismatch between the substrate and the workpiece and a different depth of focus178. Airy beams179 can be made using SLMs and are very promising in laser cutting applications similarly to the BesselGauss beams180.

Different incarnations of polarization and phase control setups using SLMs, diffractive optical elements and axicon lenses can be used to generate light intensity distributions, such as doughnut, GaussianBessel181,182 or at-top. Experimenting with such beams

is a currently active eld of investigation along with the control of spatial-temporal focusing168. Arrays of beams with individual control of polarization, intensity prole and front tilt can speed

p8SaEin

eia

2

i cos b sin b 1 cos b i sin b i

Light: Science & Applications doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

11

up fabrication and more efciently use laser power in industrial applications183.

CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOKThis mini-review of the state of the art and emerging applications shows the maturity of the 20-year-old eld. The productivity of fs-laser fabrication required for practical applications is demonstrated to be consistent with technologically matured fabrication methods used in 2D planar microelectronics and is now challenging true 3D microfabrication. A comparison with the production of basic 3D building blocks in a living cellproteinsthat acquire 3D conformation encoded in a linear RNA or DNA sequence is shown to follow similar scaling to the fastest examples of direct laser writing used for fabrication of fully functional 3D patterns: optical gratings, bio-scaffolds and PhCs. The 3D wiring of future telecommunication circuitry by 3D waveguides is another successful emerging application.

Biomedical applications involving phenomena from the receptor scale of 10 nm up to implantable 3D scaffolds with cross-sections 41 cm require adequate biocompatible materials and processing approaches to structure them. Here, we show that modern laser processing with ultrashort laser pulses can address this challenge from the resolution, productivity and materials points of view. By controlled laser curing, photoinitiators become obsolete56, and lightmatter interaction is controlled solely by parameters of light. This feature opens the window to the use of tested biocompatible materials without bio-toxic additives and polymerization promoters28. In the future,

proteins can be used for optical applications and laser structured from micro- to macroscale patterns or devices184.

Advances in the understanding of lightmatter interaction peculiarities in different materials at diverse conditions of ultrashort pulse delivery onto the surface or inside transparent materials are helping simplify material processing protocols. The reliability of lasers and maturity of fs-pulse control in terms of duration, spatiotemporal chirp and focusing, and polarization meets the 24/7 requirements of industrial applications. Time will tell the extent to which these methods will become niche for this technology in real-world applications within the next few years. Rival technologies based on long pulses and continuous laser radiation along with fast and precise workpiece positioning and 3D printing are disruptive technologies155.

Innovative disruptive technologies have proved in the past to be commercially successful. Could the demonstrated fabrication at the feature size of 100 nm and submicron spatial resolution (a separation between individual features) delivered at the millimeter scale be a tipping point185 for industrial adaptation of fs-laser fabrication? The millimeter-size 3D scaffolds can be made out of the same material and laser cured without toxic initiators for implant applications within a practical time frame. This span of mesoscales from the formation of nano-features to implantable structures is a unique and appealing characteristic of 3D printing by DLW. The Tennant scaling law shows that this 3D technology is mature in terms of its industrial productivity.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSMM acknowledges nancial support by a project ReSoft (SEN-13/2015) from

the Research Council of Lithuania. We are grateful to Andrew Clayton for

discussions on protein production in cells, to Andrei Rode and Eugene Gamaly

for continuous search of new phenomena in lightmatter interactions and to

Etienne Brasselet for joint work on optical vortex generators. VM appreciates

support by JSPS Kakenhi Grant No. 15K04637. Partial support via ARC Dis

covery DP120102980 is acknowledged. SJ is thankful to Gintas lekys for the

partnership project with Altechna Ltd on industrial fs-laser fabrication.

1 Davis KM, Miura K, Sugimoto N, Hirao K. Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser. Opt Lett 1996; 21: 17291731.

2 Maruo S, Nakamura O, Kawata S. Three-dimensional microfabrication with two-photon-absorbed photopolymerization. Opt Lett 1997; 22: 132134.

3 Kawata S, Sun HB, Tanaka T, Takada K. Finer features for functional microdevices. Nature 2001; 412: 697698.

4 Glezer EN, Milosavljevic M, Huang L, Finlay RJ, Her TH et al. Three-dimensional optical storage inside transparent materials. Opt Lett 1996; 21: 20232025.

5 Watanabe M, Sun HB, Juodkazis S, Takahashi T, Matsuo S et al. Three-dimensional optical data storage in vitreous silica. Jpn J Appl Phys 1998; 37: L1527L1530.

6 Marshall GD, Politi A, Matthews JCF, Dekker P, Ams M et al. Laser written waveguide photonic quantum circuits. Opt Express 2009; 17: 1254612554.

7 Sansoni L, Sciarrino F, Vallone G, Mataloni P, Crespi A et al. Polarization entangled state measurement on a chip. Phys Rev Lett 2010; 105: 200503.

8 Deubel M, von Freymann G, Wegener M, Pereira S, Busch K et al. Direct laser writing of three-dimensional photonic-crystal templates for telecommunications. Nat Mater 2004; 3: 444447.

9 Bckmann T, Thiel M, Kadic M, Schittny R, Wegener M. An elasto-mechanical unfeelability cloak made of pentamode metamaterials. Nat Commun 2013;

5: 4130.10 Wu D, Xu J, Niu LG, Wu SZ, Midorikawa K et al. In-channel integration of designable microoptical devices using at scaffold-supported femtosecond-laser microfabrication for coupling-free optouidic cell counting. Light: Sci Appl 2015; 4: e228.

11 Malinauskas M, Farsari M, Piskarskas A, Juodkazis S. Ultrafast laser nanostructuring of photopolymers: A decade of advances. Phys Rep 2013; 533: 131.

12 Cary HB, Helzer SC. Modern Welding Technology. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2005.

13 Malinauskas M, Lukosevicius L, Butkus S, Paipulas D. Femtosecond pulse light lament-assisted microfabrication of biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) material. J Laser Micro Nanoeng 2015; 10: 222228.

14 Mikutis M, Kudrius T, Slekys G, Paipulas D, Juodkazis S. High 90% efciency Bragg gratings formed in fused silica by femtosecond GaussBessel laser beams. Opt Mat Express 2013; 3: 18621871.

15 Lapointe J, Gagn M, Li MJ, Kashyap R. Making smart phones smarter with photonics. Opt Express 2014; 22: 1547315483.

16 Minardi S, Milin C, Majus D, Gopal A, Tamosauskas G et al. Energy deposition dynamics of femtosecond pulses in water. Appl Phys Lett 2014; 105: 224104.17 Butkus S, Gaizauskas E, Paipulas D, Viburys Z, Kaskelyte D et al. Rapid micro-fabrication of transparent materials using lamented femtosecond laser pulses. Appl Phys A 2014; 114: 8190.

18 Malinauskas M, Rekstyte S, Lukosevicius L, Butkus S, Balciunas E et al. 3D microporous scaffolds manufactured via combination of fused lament fabrication and direct laser writing ablation. Micromachines 2014; 5: 839858.

19 Matsumoto H, Unrath M, Zhang HB, Hainsey B. Laser direct ablation for patterning printed wiring boards using ultra-fast lasers and high speed beam delivery architectures. J Laser Micro Nanoeng 2013; 8: 315320.

20 Kato JI, Takeyasu N, Adachi Y, Sun HB, Kawata S. Multiple-spot parallel processing for laser micronanofabrication. Appl Phys Lett 2005; 86: 044102.

21 Stankevicius E, Gertus T, Rutkauskas M, Gedvilas M, Raciukaitis G et al. Fabrication of micro-tube arrays in photopolymer SZ2080 by using three different methods of a direct laser polymerization technique. J Micromech Microeng 2012;

22: 065022.22 Gittard SD, Nguyen A, Obata K, Koroleva A, Narayan RJ et al. Fabrication of microscale medical devices by two-photon polymerization with multiple foci via a spatial light modulator. Biomed Opt Express 2011; 2: 31673178.

23 Ajeti V, Lien CH, Chen SJ, Su PJ, Squirrell JM et al. Image-inspired 3D multiphoton excited fabrication of extracellular matrix structures by modulated raster scanning. Opt Express 2013; 21: 2534625355.

24 Shank CV, Yen R, Hirlimann C. Time-resolved reectivity measurements of femtosecond-optical-pulse-induced phase transitions in silicon. Phys Rev Lett 1983; 50: 454457.

25 Gattass RR, Mazur E. Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials. Nat Photon 2008; 2: 219225.

26 Sugioka K, Cheng Y. Ultrafast lasersreliable tools for advanced materials processing. Light: Sci Appl 2014; 3: e149.

27 Marrian CRK, Tennant DM. Nanofabrication. J Vac Sci Technol A 2003; 21: S207S215.

28 Rekstyte S, Malinauskas M, Juodkazis S. Three-dimensional laser micro-sculpturing of silicone: towards bio-compatible scaffolds. Opt Express 2013; 21: 1702817041.

29 Buividas R, Mikutis M, Juodkazis S. Surface and bulk structuring of materials by ripples with long and short laser pulses: recent advances. Prog Quant Electronics 2014; 38: 119156.

30 Phillips R, Kondev J, Theriot J, Garcia H. Physical Biology of the Cell, 2nd ed. GS Garland Science; 2012.

31 Iwai H. Roadmap for 22 nm and beyond (invited paper). Microelectr Eng 2009; 86: 15201528.

32 Petrochenko PE, Torgersen J, Gruber P, Hicks LA, Zheng JW et al. Laser 3D printing with sub-microscale resolution of porous elastomeric scaffolds for supporting human bone stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater 2015; 4: 739747.

33 Ovsianikov A, Xiao SZ, Farsari M, Vamvakaki M, Fotakis C et al. Shrinkage of microstructures produced by two-photon polymerization of Zr-based hybrid photosensitive materials. Opt Express 2009; 17: 21432148.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Light: Science & Applications

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

12

34 Maruo S, Hasegawa T, Yoshimura N. Single-anchor support and supercritical CO2 drying enable high-precision microfabrication of three-dimensional structures. Opt Express 2009; 17: 2094520951.

35 Borisov RA, Dorojkina GN, Koroteev NI, Kozenkov VM, Magnitskii SA et al. Femtosecond two-photon photopolymerization: a method to fabricate optical photonic crystals with controllable parameters. Laser Phys 1998; 8: 11051108.

36 Baldacchini T, LaFratta CN, Farrer RA, Teich MC, Saleh BEA et al. Acrylic-based resin with favorable properties for three-dimensional two-photon polymerization. J Appl Phys 2004; 95: 60726076.

37 Nguyen LH, Straub M, Gu M. Acrylate-based photopolymer for two-photon micro-fabrication and photonic applications. Adv Func Mat 2005; 15: 209216.

38 Serbin J, Ovsianikov A, Chichkov B. Fabrication of woodpile structures by two-photon polymerization and investigation of their optical properties. Opt Express 2004; 12: 52215228.

39 Teh WH, Drig U, Salis G, Harbers R, Drechsler U et al. SU-8 for real three-dimensional subdiffraction-limit two-photon microfabrication. Appl Phys Lett 2004; 84: 40954097.

40 Juodkazis S, Mizeikis V, Seet KK, Miwa M, Misawa H. Two-photon lithography of nanorods in SU-8 photoresist. Nanotechnology 2005; 16: 846849.

41 Juodkazis S, Mizeikis V, Misawa H. Three-dimensional microfabrication of materials by femtosecond lasers for photonics applications. J Appl Phys 2009; 106: 051101.

42 von Freymann G, Ledermann A, Thiel M, Staude I, Essig S et al. Three-dimensional nanostructures for photonics. Adv Func Mat 2010; 20: 10381052.

43 Farsari M, Vamvakaki M, Chichkov BN. Multiphoton polymerization of hybrid materials. J Opt 2010; 12: 124001.

44 Ovsianikov A, Viert J, Chichkov B, Oubaha M, MacCraith B et al. Ultra-low shrinkage hybrid photosensitive material for two-photon polymerization microfabrication. ACS Nano 2008; 2: 22572262.

45 Terzaki K, Vasilantonakis N, Gaidukeviciute A, Reinhardt C, Fotakis C et al. 3D conducting nanostructures fabricated using direct laser writing. Opt Mater Express 2011; 1: 586597.

46 Sakellari I, Kabouraki E, Gray D, Purlys V, Fotakis C et al. Diffusion-assisted high-resolution direct femtosecond laser writing. ACS Nano 2012; 6: 23022311.

47 Terzaki K, Kissamitaki M, Skarmoutsou A, Fotakis C, Charitidis CA et al. Pre-osteoblastic cell response on three-dimensional, organic-inorganic hybrid material scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mat Res A 2013; 101A: 22832294.

48 Zukauskas A, Bataviciute G, Sciuka M, Balevicius Z, Melninkaitis A et al. Effect of the photoinitiator presence and exposure conditions on laser-induced damage threshold of ORMOSIL (SZ2080). Opt Mat 2015; 39: 224231.

49 Nanoscribe GmbH 2015. Available from http://www.nanoscribe.de/

Web End =http://www.nanoscribe.de/ (updated 5 November 2015).

50 Bckmann T, Stenger N, Kadic M, Kaschke J, Frlich A et al. Tailored 3D mechanical metamaterials made by dip-in direct-laser-writing optical lithography. Adv Mater 2012; 24: 27102714.

51 Sun HB, Suwa T, Takada K, Zaccaria P, Kim MS et al. Shape precompensation in two-photon laser nanowriting of photonic lattices. Appl Phys Lett 2004; 85: 37083710.

52 Li Y, Qi FJ, Yang H, Gong QH, Dong XZ et al. Nonuniform shrinkage and stretching of polymerized nanostructures fabricated by two-photon photopolymerization. Nanotechnology 2008; 19: 055303.

53 Sun Q, Juodkazis S, Murazawa N, Mizeikis V, Misawa H. Freestanding and movable photonic microstructures fabricated by photopolymerization with femtosecond laser pulses. J Micromech Microeng 2010; 20: 3500435008.

54 Zhou WH, Kuebler SM, Braun KL, Yu TY, Cammack JK et al. An efcient two-photon-generated photoacid applied to positive-tone 3D microfabrication. Science 2002; 296: 11061109.

55 Gansel JK, Thiel M, Rill MS, Decker M, Bade K et al. Gold helix photonic metamaterial as broadband circular polarizer. Science 2009; 325: 15131515.

56 Malinauskas M, Zukauskas A, Bickauskaite G, Gadonas R, Juodkazis S. Mechanisms of three-dimensional structuring of photo-polymers by tightly focussed femtosecond laser pulses. Opt Express 2010; 18: 1020910221.

57 Maruo S, Ikuta K. Three-dimensional microfabrication by use of single-photon-absorbed polymerization. Appl Phys Lett 2000; 76: 26562658.

58 Seet KK, Juodkazis S, Jarutis V, Misawa H. Feature-size reduction of photopolymerized structures by femtosecond optical curing of SU-8. Appl Phys Lett 2006; 89: 024106.

59 Brasselet E, Malinauskas M, Zukauskas A, Juodkazis S. Photopolymerized microscopic vortex beam generators: precise delivery of optical orbital angular momentum. Appl Phys Lett 2010; 97: 211108.

60 Mizeikis V, Seet KK, Juodkazis S, Misawa H. Three-dimensional woodpile photonic crystal templates for the infrared spectral range. Opt Lett 2004; 29: 20612063.

61 Seet KK, Mizeikis V, Juodkazis S, Misawa H. Three-dimensional horizontal circular spiral photonic crystals with stop gaps below 1 m. Appl Phys Lett 2006; 88: 221101.

62 Sun HB, Takada K, Kawata S. Elastic force analysis of functional polymer submicron oscillators. Appl Phys Lett 2001; 79: 31733175.

63 Park SH, Yang DY, Lee KS. Two-photon stereolithography for realizing ultraprecise three-dimensional nano/microdevices. Laser Photon Rev 2009; 3: 111.

64 Farsari M, Chichkov BN. Materials processing: Two-photon fabrication. Nat Photon 2009; 3: 450452.

65 Zhang YL, Chen QD, Xia H, Sun HB. Designable 3D nanofabrication by femtosecond laser direct writing. NanoToday 2010; 5: 435448.

66 He F, Liao Y, Lin J, Song J, Qiao L et al. Femtosecond laser fabrication of monolithically integrated micfrouidic sensors in glass. Sensors 2014; 14: 1940219440.

67 Hohmann JK, Renner M, Waller EH, von Freymann G. Three-dimensional -printing: an enabling technology. Adv Opt Mat 2015; 3: 14881507.

68 Newport Corp 2016. Available from http://www.newport.com/

Web End =http://www.newport.com/ (updated 5 November 2015).

69 Altechna R&D, 2015. Available from http://www.wophotonics.com/

Web End =http://www.wophotonics.com/ (updated 5 November 2015).

70 Photonic Solution Ltd 2015. Available from http://www.photonicsolutions.co.uk/

Web End =http://www.photonicsolutions.co.uk/ (updated 5 November 2015).

71 Danilevicius P, Rekstyte S, Balciunas E, Kraniauskas A, Jarasiene R et al. Micro-structured polymer scaffolds fabricated by direct laser writing for tissue engineering. J Biomed Opt 2012; 17: 081405.

72 Torgersen J, Qin XH, Li ZQ, Ovsianikov A, Liska R et al. Hydrogels for two-photon polymerization: a toolbox for mimicking the extracellular matrix. Adv Func Mat 2013; 23: 45424554.

73 Fischer J, Wegener M. Three-dimensional direct laser writing inspired by stimulated-emission-depletion microscopy (invited). Opt Mat Express 2011; 1: 614624.

74 Waller EH, Renner M, von Freymann G. Active aberration- and point-spread-function control in direct laser writing. Opt Express 2012; 20: 2494924956.

75 Klar TA, Wollhofen R, Jacak J. Sub-Abbe resolution: from STED microscopy to STED lithography. Phys Scr 2014; 2014: 014049.

76 Tielen V, Bellouard Y. Three-dimensional glass monolithic micro-exure fabricated by femtosecond laser exposure and chemical etching. Micromachines 2014; 5: 697710.

77 int Velda BH, Overmeyer L, Schmidt M, Wegener K, Malshe A et al. Micro additive manufacturing using ultra short laser pulses. CIRP Annal Manufact Technol 2015; 64: 701724.

78 Tan DZ, Sharafudeen KN, Yue YZ, Qiu JR. Femtosecond laser induced phenomena in transparent solid materials: fundamentals and applications. Prog Mat Sci 2016; 76: 154228.

79 Liberale C, Cojoc G, Candeloro P, Das G, Gentile F et al. Micro-optics fabrication on top of optical bers using two-photon lithography. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2010; 22: 474476.

80 Malinauskas M, Zukauskas A, Purlys V, Belazaras K, Momot A et al. Femtosecond laser polymerization of hybrid/integrated micro-optical elements and their characterization. J Opt 2010; 12: 124010.

81 Zukauskas A, Melissinaki V, Kaskelyte D, Farsari M, Malinauskas M. Improvement of the fabrication accuracy of ber tip microoptical components via mode eld expansion. J Laser Micro Nanoeng 2014; 9: 6872.

82 Lin XF, Hu GQ, Chen QD, Niu LG, Li QS et al. A light-driven turbine-like micro-rotor and study on its light-to-mechanical power conversion efciency. Appl Phys Lett 2012; 101: 113901.

83 Malinauskas M, Zukauskas A, Belazaras K, Tikuisis K, Purlys V et al. Laser fabrication of various polymer microoptical components. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 2012; 58: 20501.

84 Beresna M, Gecevicius M, Kazansky PG. Polarization sensitive elements fabricated by femtosecond laser nanostructuring of glass (invited). Opt Mater Express 2011; 1: 783795.

85 Zhang JY, Gecevicius M, Beresna M, Kazansky PG. Seemingly unlimited lifetime data storage in nanostructured glass. Phys Rev Lett 2014; 112: 033901.

86 Xu JJ, Yao WG, Tian ZN, Wang L, Guan KM et al. High curvature concaveconvex microlens. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2015; 27: 24652468.

87 Wu D, Wang JN, Niu LG, Zhang XL, Wu SZ et al. Bioinspired fabrication of high-quality 3D articial compound eyes by voxel-modulation femtosecond laser writing for distortion-free wide-eld-of-view imaging. Adv Opt Mat 2014; 2: 751758.

88 Tian ZN, Yao WG, Xu JJ, Yu YH, Chen QD et al. Focal varying microlens array. Opt Lett 2015; 40: 42224225.

89 Jin P, Gao YL, Liu TT, Li XJ, Tan JB. Resist shaping for replication of micro-optical elements with continuous relief in fused silica. Opt Lett 2010; 35: 11691171.

90 Gao YL, Lin J, Jin P, Tan JB, Davies G et al. Stop grating for perfect replication of micro Fresnel lens by thermal imprinting. J Micromech Microeng 2012; 22: 065018.

91 Schumann M, Buckmann T, Gruhler N, Wegener M, Pernice W. Hybrid 2D3D optical devices for integrated optics by direct laser writing. Light: Sci Appl 2014;

3: e175.92 Liu DX, Sun YL, Dong WF, Yang RZ, Chen QD et al. Dynamic laser prototyping for biomimetic nanofabrication. Laser Photon Rev 2014; 8: 882888.93 Zukauskas A, Matulaitiene I, Paipulas D, Niaura G, Malinauskas M et al. Tuning the refractive index in 3D direct laser writing lithography: Towards GRIN microoptics.

Laser Photon Rev 2015; 9: 706712.94 Mizeikis V, Purlys V, Buividas R, Juodkazis S. Realization of structural color by direct laser write technique in photoresist. J Laser Micro Nanoeng 2014; 9: 4245.

95 Sun HB, Matsuo S, Misawa H. Three-dimensional photonic crystal structures achieved with two-photon-absorption photopolymerization of resin. Appl Phys Lett 1999; 74: 786788.

96 Kaneko K, Sun HB, Duan X, Kawata S. Submicron diamond-lattice photonic crystals produced by two-photon laser nanofabrication. Appl Phys Lett 2003; 83: 20912093.

97 Serbin J, Gu M. Experimental evidence for superprism effects in three-dimensional polymer photonic crystals. Adv Mater 2006; 18: 221224.

98 Ttreault N, von Freymann G, Deubel M, Hermatschweiler M, Prez-Willard F et al. New route to three-dimensional photonic bandgap materials: silicon double inversion of polymer templates. Adv Mater 2006; 18: 457460.

Light: Science & Applications doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

13

99 Seet KK, Mizeikis V, Kannari K, Juodkazis S, Misawa H et al. Templating and replication of spiral photonic crystals for silicon photonics. IEEE J Select Topics Quant Electr 2008; 14: 10641073.

100 Vasilantonakis N, Terzaki K, Sakellari I, Purlys V, Gray D et al. Three-dimensional metallic photonic crystals with optical bandgaps. Adv Mater 2012; 24: 11011105.

101 Maigyte L, Purlys V, Trull J, Peckus M, Cojocaru C et al. Flat lensing in the visible frequency range by woodpile photonic crystals. Opt Lett 2013; 38: 23762378.

102 Wong S, Deubel M, Prez-Willard F, John S, Ozin GA et al. Direct laser writing of three-dimensional photonic crystals with a complete photonic bandgap in chalcogenide glasses. Adv Mater 2006; 18: 265269.

103 Seet KK, Mizeikis V, Matsuo S, Juodkazis S, Misawa H. Three-dimensional spiral-architecture photonic crystals obtained by direct laser writing. Adv Mater 2005; 17: 541545.

104 Thiel M, Decker M, Deubel M, Wegener M, Linden S et al. Polarization stop bands in chiral polymeric three-dimensional photonic crystals. Adv Mater 2007; 19: 207210.

105 Deubel M, Wegener M, Kaso A, John S. Direct laser writing and characterization of

slanted pore photonic crystals. Appl Phys Lett 2004; 85: 18951897.106 Thiel M, Rill MS, von Freymann G, Wegener M. Three-dimensional bi-chiral photonic crystals. Adv Mater 2009; 21: 46804682.

107 Joannopoulos JD, Johnson SG, Winn JN, Meade RD. Photonic Crystals: Molding the

Flow of Light, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008.108 Fischer J, von Freymann G, Wegener M. The materials challenge in diffraction-unlimited direct-laser-writing optical lithography. Adv Mater 2010; 22: 35783582.

109 Wollhofen R, Katzmann J, Hrelescu C, Jacak J, Klar TA. 120 nm resolution and 55 nm structure size in STED-lithography. Opt Express 2013; 21: 1083110840.

110 Fischer J, Wegener M. Three-dimensional optical laser lithography beyond the diffraction limit. Laser Photon Rev 2013; 7: 2244.

111 Thiel M, Ott J, Radk A, Kaschke J, Wegener M. Dip-in depletion optical lithography of three-dimensional chiral polarizers. Opt Lett 2013; 38: 42524255.

112 Rittweger E, Han KY, Irvine SE, Eggeling C, Hell SW. STED microscopy reveals crystal colour centres with nanometric resolution. Nat Photon 2009; 3: 144147.

113 Fischer J, Wegener M. Ultrafast polymerization inhibition by stimulated emission depletion for three-dimensional nanolithography. Adv Mater 2012; 24: OP65OP69.

114 Fourkas JT. Nanoscale photolithography with visible light. J Phys Chem Lett 2010; 1:

12211227.115 Li LJ, Gattass RR, Gershgoren E, Hwang H, Fourkas JT. Achieving /20 resolution by one-color initiation and deactivation of polymerization. Science 2009; 324: 910913.116 Wiesbauer M, Wollhofen R, Vasic B, Schilcher K, Jacak J et al. Nano-anchors with single protein capacity produced with STED lithography. Nano Lett 2013; 13: 56725678.117 Mueller JB, Fischer J, Mayer F, Kadic M, Wegener M. Polymerization kinetics in three-dimensional direct laser writing. Adv Mater 2014; 26: 65666571.

118 Jiang LJ, Zhou YS, Xiong W, Gao Y, Huang X et al. Two-photon polymerization: investigation of chemical and mechanical properties of resins using Raman micro-spectroscopy. Opt Lett 2014; 39: 30343037.

119 Mueller P, Thiel M, Wegener M. 3D direct laser writing using a 405 nm diode laser.

Opt Lett 2014; 39: 68476850.120 Malinauskas M, Rekstyte S, Jonavicius T, Mizeikis V, Gamaly E et al. Femtosecond pulsed light polarization induced peculiarities in direct laser writing 3D nanolithography. Proc. CLEO 2015; CM1: 2.

121 Lindenmann N, Balthasar G, Hillerkuss D, Schmogrow R, Jordan M et al. Photonic wire bonding: a novel concept for chip-scale interconnects. Opt Express 2012; 20: 1766717677.

122 Lindenmann N, Dottermusch S, Goedecke ML, Hoose T, Billah MR et al. Connecting silicon photonic circuits to multicore bers by photonic wire bonding. J Lightwave Technol 2015; 33: 755760.

123 Gamaly EG, Rapp L, Roppo V, Juodkazis S, Rode AV. Generation of high energy density by fs-laser induced conned microexplosion. New J Phys 2013; 15: 025018.

124 Gamaly EG, Vailionis A, Mizeikis V, Yang W, Rode AV et al. Warm dense matter at the bench-top: Fs-laser induced conned microexplosion. High Energ Dens Phys 2012; 8: 1317.

125 Bressel L, de Ligny D, Sonneville C, Martinez V, Mizeikis V et al. Femtosecond laser induced density changes in GeO2 and SiO2 glasses: ctive temperature effect. Opt

Mater Express 2011; 1: 605613.126 Buividas R, Gervinskas G, Tadich A, Cowie BCC, Mizeikis V et al. Phase transformation in laser-induced micro-explosion in olivine (Fe,Mg)2SiO4. Adv Eng Mater 2014; 16: 767773.

127 Juodkazis S, Nishimura K, Misawa H, Ebisui T, Waki R et al. Control over the crystalline state of sapphire. Adv Mater 2006; 18: 13611364.

128 Vailionis A, Gamaly EG, Mizeikis V, Yang WG, Rode AV et al. Evidence of super-dense aluminium synthesized by ultra-fast micro-explosion. Nat Commun 2011; 2: 445.

129 Juodkazis S, Misawa H, Gamaly EG, Luther-Davis B, Hallo L et al. Is the nano-explosion really microscopic? J Non-Crystall Solids 2009; 355: 11601162.

130 Watanabe M, Juodkazis S, Sun HB, Matsuo S, Misawa H. Luminescence and defect formation by visible and near-infrared irradiation of vitreous silica. Phys Rev B 1999;

60: 99599964.131 Sun HB, Juodkazis S, Watanabe M, Matsuo S, Misawa H et al. Generation and recombination of defects in vitreous silica induced by irradiation with a near-infrared femtosecond laser. J Phys Chem B 2000; 104: 34503455.

132 Kudrius T, Slekys G, Juodkazis S. Surface-texturing of sapphire by femtosecond laser pulses for photonic applications. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2010; 43: 145501.

133 Marcinkevicius A, Juodkazis S, Watanabe M, Miwa M, Matsuo S et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted three-dimensional microfabrication in silica. Opt Lett 2001; 26: 277279.

134 Juodkazis S, Misawa H, Hashimoto T, Gamaly EG, Luther-Davies B. Laser-induced micro-explosion conned in a bulk of silica: formation of nanovoids. Appl Phys Lett 2006; 88: 201909.

135 Juodkazis S, Nishi Y, Misawa H. Femtosecond laser-assisted formation of channels in sapphire using KOH solution. RRL-Phys Stat Sol 2008; 2: 275277.

136 Vitek DN, Block E, Bellouard Y, Adams DE, Backus S et al. Spatio-temporally focused femtosecond laser pulses for nonreciprocal writing in optically transparent materials.

Opt Express 2010; 18: 2467324678.137 Kazansky PG, Shimotsuma Y, Sakakura M, Beresna M, Gecevicius M et al.

Photosensitivity control of an isotropic medium through polarization of light pulses with tilted intensity front. Opt Express 2011; 19: 2065720664.

138 Juodkazis S, Nishimura K, Misawa H. Three-dimensional laser structuring of materials at tight focusing. Chin Opt Lett 2007; 5: S198S200.

139 Hatanaka K, Ida T, Ono H, Matsushima SI, Fukumura H et al. Chirp effect in hard

X-ray generation from liquid target when irradiated by femtosecond pulses. Opt Express 2008; 16: 1265012657.140 Richter S, Nolte S, Tnnermann A. Ultrashort pulse laser weldinga new approach for high-stability bonding of different glasses. Phys Proceed 2012; 39: 556562.

141 Sano T, Iwasaki S, Ozeki Y, Itoh K, Hirose A. Femtosecond laser direct joining of copper with polyethylene terephthalate. Mater Trans 2013; 54: 926930.

142 Kabashin AV, Meunier M. Synthesis of colloidal nanoparticles during femtosecond laser ablation of gold in water. J Appl Phys 2003; 94: 79417943.

143 Kubiliute R, Maximova KA, Lajevardipour A, Yong J, Hartley JS et al. Ultra-pure, water-dispersed Au nanoparticles produced by femtosecond laser ablation and fragmentation. Int J Nanomed 2013; 8: 26012611.

144 Morikawa J, Orie A, Hashimoto T, Juodkazis S. Thermal and optical properties of the femtosecond-laser-structured and stress-induced birefringent regions in sapphire. Opt Express 2010; 18: 83008310.

145 Chen F, de Aldana JRV. Optical waveguides in crystalline dielectric materials produced by femtosecond-laser micromachining. Laser Photon Rev 2014; 8: 251275.

146 Thomson RR, Birks TA, Leon-Saval SG, Kar AK, Bland-Hawthorn J. Ultrafast laser inscription of an integrated photonic lantern. Opt Express 2011; 19: 56985705.

147 Jovanovic N, Spaleniak I, Gross S, Ireland M, Lawrence JS et al. Integrated photonic building blocks for next-generation astronomical instrumentation I: the multimode waveguide. Opt Express 2012; 20: 1702917043.

148 Spaleniak I, Gross S, Jovanovic N, Williams RJ, Lawrence JS et al. Multiband processing of multimode light: combining 3D photonic lanterns with waveguide Bragg gratings. Laser Photon Rev 2014; 8: L1L5.

149 Spaleniak I, Jovanovic N, Gross S, Ireland MJ, Lawrence JS et al. Integrated photonic building blocks for next-generation astronomical instrumentation II: the multimode to single mode transition. Opt Express 2013; 21: 2719727208.

150 Bland-Hawthorn J, Kern P. Astrophotonics: a new era for astronomical instruments.

Opt Express 2009; 17: 18801884.151 Ams M, Marshall GD, Dekker P, Piper JA, Withford MJ. Ultrafast laser written active devices. Laser Photon Rev 2009; 3: 535544.

152 Haque M, Lee KKC, Ho S, Fernandes LA, Herman PR. Chemical-assisted femtosecond laser writing of lab-in-bers. Lab Chip 2014; 14: 38173829.

153 Birks TA, Gris-Snchez I, Yerolatsitis S, Leon-Saval SG, Thomson RR. The photonic lantern. Adv Opt Photon 2015; 7: 107167.

154 Maciulaitis J, Deveikyte M, Rekstyte S, Bratchikov M, Darinskas A et al. Preclinical study of SZ2080 material 3D microstructured scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering made by femtosecond direct laser writing lithography. Biofabrication 2015; 7: 015015.

155 Christensen CM. The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great

Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1997.156 Poh PSP, Hutmacher DW, Stevens MM, Woodruff MA. Fabrication and in vitro characterization of bioactive glass composite scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Biofabrication 2013; 5: 045005.157 Ovsianikov A, Mhleder S, Torgersen J, Li ZQ, Qin XH et al. Laser photofabrication of cell-containing hydrogel constructs. Langmuir 2014; 30: 37873794.158 Marino A, Filippeschi C, Mattoli V, Mazzolai B, Ciofani G. Biomimicry at the nanoscale: current research and perspectives of two-photon polymerization. Nanoscale 2015; 7: 28412850.159 Juodkazis S, Mizeikis V, Seet KK, Misawa H, Wegst UGK. Mechanical properties and tuning of three-dimensional polymeric photonic crystals. Appl Phys Lett 2007; 91: 241904.160 Klein F, Richter B, Striebel T, Franz CM, von Freymann G et al. Two-component polymer scaffolds for controlled three-dimensional cell culture. Adv Mater 2011; 23: 13411345.161 Rekstyte S, Kaziulionyte E, Balciunas E, Kaskelyte D, Malinauskas M. Direct laser fabrication of composite material 3D microstructured scaffolds. J Laser Micro/ Nanoeng 2014; 9: 2530.162 Clayton AHA. Cell surface receptors in the 21st century. AIMS Biophys 2014; 1:

5152.163 Bauer J, Hengsbach S, Tesari I, Schwaiger R, Kraft O. High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture. Proc Natl Sci USA 2014; 111: 24532458.

164 Sun YL, Li Q, Sun SM, Huang JC, Zheng BY et al. Aqueous multiphoton lithography with multi-functional silk-centered bio-resists. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8612.

165 Piqu A, Kim H. Laser-induced forward transfer of functional materials: advances and future directions. J Laser Micro Nanoeng 2014; 9: 192197.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Light: Science & Applications

Ultrafast laser processing of materials

M Malinauskas et al

14

166 Hallo L, Mzel C, Bourgeade A, Hbert D, Gamaly EG et al. Laser-matter interaction in transparent materials: conned micro-explosion and jet formation. In: Hall TJ, Gaponenko SV, Paredes SA editors. Extreme Photonics & Applications. Netherlands:

Springer; 2010, pp 121146.167 Danieliene E, Gabryte E, Danielius R, Vengris M, Vaiceliunaite A et al. Corneal stromal ablation with femtosecond ultraviolet pulses in rabbits. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 39: 258267.168 Kim D, So PTC. High-throughput three-dimensional lithographic microfabrication. Opt

Lett 2010; 35: 16021604.169 Hasegawa S, Hayasaki Y. Holographic vector wave femtosecond laser processing.

Int J Optomechatr 2014; 8: 7388.170 Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, Janusziewicz R, Johnson AR et al.

Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 2015; 347: 13491352.171 Obata K, Koch J, Hinze U, Chichkov BN. Multi-focus two-photon polymerization technique based on individually controlled phase modulation. Opt Express 2010; 18: 1719317200.172 Waller EH, von Freymann G. Multi foci with diffraction limited resolution. Opt Express

2013; 21: 2170821713.173 Vizsnyiczai G, Kelemen L, Ormos P. Holographic multi-focus 3D two-photon polymerization with real-time calculated holograms. Opt Express 2014; 22: 2421724223.174 Gecevicius M, Beresna M, Drevinskas R, Kazansky PG. Airy beams generated by ultrafast laser-imprinted space-variant nanostructures in glass. Opt Lett 2014; 39: 67916794.175 Bonse J, Baudach S, Krger J, Kautek W, Lenzner M. Femtosecond laser ablation of silicon-modication thresholds and morphology. Appl Phys A 2002; 74: 1925.

176 Gedvilas M, Miksys J, Raciukaitis G. Flexible periodical micro- and nano-structuring of a stainless steel surface using dual-wavelength double-pulse picosecond laser irradiation. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 7507575080.

177 Cumming BP, Jesacher A, Booth MJ, Wilson T, Gu M. Adaptive aberration compensation for three-dimensional micro-fabrication of photonic crystals in lithium niobate. Opt Express 2011; 19: 94199425.

178 Marcinkevicius A, Mizeikis V, Juodkazis S, Matsuo S, Misawa H. Effect of refractive index-mismatch on laser microfabrication in silica glass. Appl Phys A 2003; 76: 257260.

179 Rogel-Salazar J, Jimnez-Romero HA, Chvez-Cerda S. Full characterization of Airy beams under physical principles. Phys Rev A 2014; 89: 023807.

180 Marcinkevicius A, Juodkazis S, Matsuo S, Mizeikis V, Misawa H. Application of Bessel beams for microfabrication of dielectrics by femtosecond laser. Jpn J Appl Phys 2001;

40: L1197L1199.181 Sheppard CJR, Wilson T. Gaussian-beam theory of lenses with annular aperture. IEEE

J Microwaves Opt Acoust 1978; 2: 105112.182 Durnin J, Miceli JJ, Eberly JH. Diffraction-free beams. Phys Rev Lett 1987; 58:

14991501.183 Hasegawa S, Hayasaki Y. Adaptive optimization of a hologram in holographic femtosecond laser processing system. Opt Lett 2009; 34: 2224.

184 Sun YL, Dong WF, Niu LG, Jiang T, Liu DX et al. Protein-based soft micro-optics fabricated by femtosecond laser direct writing. Light: Sci Appl 2014; 3: e129.

185 Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. NewYork: Back Bay Books; 2000.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise inthe credit line;ifthe materialisnot included under the Creative Commons license,users will need to obtainpermission from the licenseholder to reproduce thematerial. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Light: Science & Applications doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133

Web End =10.1038/lsa.2016.133