Citation: Coelho AC, Trinconi CT, Costa CHN, Uliana SRB (2016) In Vitro and In Vivo Miltefosine Susceptibility of a Leishmania amazonensis Isolate from a Patient with Diffuse Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Follow-Up. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10(7): e0004720. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004720
Editor: Charles L. Jaffe, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, ISRAEL
Received: November 19, 2015; Accepted: April 21, 2016; Published: July 14, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Coelho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, 2011/20484-7 and 2015/09080-2) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 473343/2012-6). ACC and CTT are supported by FAPESP fellowships 2012/14629-5 and 2011/18858-6, respectively. SRBU is the recipient of a senior researcher scholarship from CNPq. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Miltefosine is the most efficacious oral drug available for the treatment of leishmaniasis. While miltefosine has been in use in India for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis for a number of years [1], its application to the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis is still under investigation [2-4]. We recently reported that miltefosine was effective in the treatment of Leishmania amazonensis infections in a mouse experimental model [5]. Those results were obtained in BALB/c mice infected with two different L. amazonensis strains: a type strain (M2269) and an isolate obtained from a patient with diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis (2506). Five weeks after infection, treatment was initiated when lesions on the hind left footpad were apparent. Miltefosine 13 mg/kg/day was given orally for 15 consecutive days to groups composed of five mice. The animals infected with M2269 or 2506 parasites were considered clinically cured at the end of treatment. One week after the end of treatment, the mice were humanely killed for parasitological examination. Histopathological examinations of the infection site and limiting dilution assays performed with the footpad tissue revealed an absence of parasites [5]. Clinical follow-up for 15 weeks after the end of the treatment showed no signs of relapse. These results were considered as evidence that treatment with miltefosine in this murine model of cutaneous leishmaniasis, a model of extreme susceptibility, was highly efficacious.
Subsequently, one of the groups described, consisting of four remaining mice infected with the M2269 strain and treated with the same dose of miltefosine, was followed up for a longer period. These animals relapsed from the 23rd week post-infection. Lesions became apparent in all four mice and appeared individually in weeks 23, 36, 39, and 39 post-infection. At these times, parasites were recovered from lesions, and the susceptibility to miltefosine was determined, as described by Coelho et al. [5]. No significant changes in drug susceptibility were found, indicating that there was no acquired resistance to miltefosine during therapy.
Furthermore, we reported that the diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis patient from which the 2506 strain had been isolated was responding well to miltefosine and pentamidine combined therapy [5]. However, after 18 months the disease reoccurred, requiring a new course of treatment. Previous clinical studies also described the occurrence of relapses after miltefosine chemotherapy in patients with diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis [6,7].
Parasite persistence after treatment with various drugs has been described [8-11] and may, in fact, be the rule in leishmaniasis. The relapses observed in this group of mice indicate that the techniques used in our previous report to characterize the parasite burden (histopathology and limiting dilution) lack the sensitivity to detect these remaining or quiescent parasites. We believe these findings are significant to the data previously reported.
Sundar S, Jha TK, Thakur CP, Engel J, Sindermann H, et al. (2002) Oral miltefosine for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. N Engl J Med 347: 1739-1746. pmid:12456849 doi: 10.1056/nejmoa021556
Soto J, Berman J (2006) Treatment of New World cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100 Suppl 1: S34-40. pmid:16930649 doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.022
Dorlo TP, Balasegaram M, Beijnen JH, de Vries PJ (2012) Miltefosine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of leishmaniasis. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2576-2597. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks275. pmid:22833634
PAHO. Leishmaniasis en las Americas: recomendaciones para el tratamiento. 2013. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=22226&Itemid
Coelho AC, Trinconi CT, Costa CH, Uliana SR (2014) In Vitro and In Vivo Miltefosine Susceptibility of a Leishmania amazonensis Isolate from a Patient with Diffuse Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e2999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002999. pmid:25033218
Calvopina M, Gomez EA, Sindermann H, Cooper PJ, Hashiguchi Y (2006) Relapse of new world diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Leishmania) mexicana after miltefosine treatment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 1074-1077. pmid:17172368
Zerpa O, Ulrich M, Blanco B, Polegre M, Avila A, et al. (2007) Diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis responds to miltefosine but then relapses. Brit J Dermatol 156: 1328-1335. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07872.x
Schubach A, Marzochi MC, Cuzzi-Maya T, Oliveira AV, Araujo ML, et al. (1998) Cutaneous scars in American tegumentary leishmaniasis patients: a site of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis persistence and viability eleven years after antimonial therapy and clinical cure. Am J Trop Med Hyg 58:824-827. pmid:9660473
Mendonça MG, de Brito ME, Rodrigues EH, Bandeira V, Jardim ML, Abath FG. (2004) Persistence of leishmania parasites in scars after clinical cure of American cutaneous leishmaniasis: is there a sterile cure? J Infect Dis 189: 1018-1023. pmid:14999605 doi: 10.1086/382135
Coutinho SG, Pirmez C, Da-Cruz AM. Parasitological and immunological follow-up of American tegumentary leishmaniasis patients (2002) Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96 Suppl 1:S173-178. pmid:12055834 doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90072-6
Vergel C, Palacios R, Cadena H, Posso CJ, Valderrama L, et al. (2006) Evidence for Leishmania (Viannia) parasites in the skin and blood of patients before and after treatment. J Infect Dis 194:503-11. pmid:16845635 doi: 10.1086/505583
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Isolate from a Patient with Diffuse Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Follow-Up. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10(7): e0004720. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004720
Abstract
Histopathological examinations of the infection site and limiting dilution assays performed with the footpad tissue revealed an absence of parasites [5]. The relapses observed in this group of mice indicate that the techniques used in our previous report to characterize the parasite burden (histopathology and limiting dilution) lack the sensitivity to detect these remaining or quiescent parasites.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer