Morphologically and Functionally Distinct Lipid Droplet Subpopulations
Shuyan Zhang,*, YangWang,*, Liujuan Cui,, Yaqin Deng,, Shimeng Xu,, JinhaiYu,, Simon Cichello, Ginette Serrero, YunshuYing & Pingsheng Liu
Lipid droplet (LD), a multi-functional organelle, is often found to associate with other cellular membranous structures and vary in size in a given cell, which may be related to their functional tissue, et al. We developed an in vitro heterogeneous in size and function, and suggest that LDs are one of cellular lipid synthetic organelles.
The lipid droplet (LD) was originally thought to be only a passive cellular storage site for excess lipids. However, in recent years, proteomic, ultra-structural and functional studies have shown that LDs are multi-functional organelles with important roles in multiple biological processes1,2. Emerging evidence also links aberrant storage of neutral lipids in LDs to human metabolic syndrome3. Recently, important advances have been made in LD biology but uncertainties remain, partly due to heterogeneity of LDs in size and function as well as interactions between LDs and other cellular organelles.
LDs have been shown to interact with other organelles. For example, during cholesterol import into adreno-cortical cells, LDs have been shown to form complexes with lysosomes4. Using electron microscopy (EM), uorescence microscopy and a reconstitution assay, our group found that LDs physically contact mitochondria and peroxisomes in skeletal muscle tissue and in cell culture5. Furthermore, using bimolecular uorescence complementation in yeast, we detected 116 pairs of inter-organelle protein contact between LDs and these two organelles in yeast6. Direct interaction between endosomes and LDs was detected in vitro previously7. These ndings suggest the involvement of LDs in intracellular lipid traffic8. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and LDs have a particularly close relationship9,10. LDs are thought to bud from the ER and electron microscopic analysis has indicated that the ER is always in close proximity to LDs11. Using integral membrane proteins that mark the monolayer of LDs, LDs were found to directly form from and return to ER in a cyclic manner12. LDs have also been described as existing in two groups, ER-associated LD (ER-LD) and cytosolic LD (C-LD)13. Hayashi et al. separated ER-LD and C-LD by sucrose gradient fractionation to study the translocation of the 1 receptor14. In that study LDs were segregated using caveolin-2 and adipocyte dierentiation related protein (ADRP) to follow ER-LDs and C-LDs, respectively. Dr. Fujimotos group proposed that the ER membrane apposed to LD be called LD-associated membrane10.
The ER has long been thought to be the primary site of lipid synthesis15. However, recent evidence indicates that LDs have an important role in lipid homeostasis. Numerous enzymes involved in lipid metabolism have been localized on isolated LDs and on LDs in intact cells1621. Furthermore, many studies have shown that LDs are sites
China.
School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, University of Texas *These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.L. (email: [email protected])
R A
P
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
1
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
for cellular lipid production1,2225. Several in vitro studies have found lipid synthetic enzymatic activity and lipid synthesis on LDs2630.
However, the interpretation of all of these ndings is complicated by the presence of membranes from ER and other organelles in LD preparations generated by standard methods. For example, EM analysis of isolated LDs have shown adherent membranous structures26 and most preparations of LDs described to date, all based on the low density of LDs, have contained a signicant number of ER proteins21,3138.
The study of LDs is further complicated by their heterogeneity in size, a distinction that may be associated with discrete functions. Interestingly, only large LDs are found to be in contact with the ER10,39. Walther et al. even found large LDs in a cell could grow by addition of triacylglycerol (TAG), synthesized locally by TAG synthesis enzymes moving along the bridge from ER to LD40,41. Small LDs did not change in size due to the unavailability of these enzymes. An imbalance between large and small LDs may be a central event in the development of metabolic syndrome42. LDs are also proposed to be sites for protein sequestration. In this process, LDs provide a binding surface for proteins and dierent sized LDs aord distinct sequestration capacities and properties43.
Biochemically dissecting the functions specic to LDs from those involving inter-organelle interaction requires a purication process that can remove all associated membranes and segregate LDs by size class. Therefore, it is clear that more advanced methods of LD purication are required to address the functions of LDs using biochemical and morphological means.
In this study, we describe a method based on dierential centrifugation with which we have successfully fractionated LDs into large, medium and small subpopulations. Interestingly, the large LDs from CHO K2 cells contained more ER proteins while the small LDs were nearly ER-depleted. The purication method was applicable to LDs from Huh7 cells, mouse liver and brown adipose tissue (BAT). A simple method was developed to assay the LD-mediated lipid synthesis in vitro using these puried populations. The results showed that the small LDs nearly depleted of ER were capable of synthesizing lipids.
In previous morphological studies LDs were found to be in contact with other membrane-bound organelles, especially the ER. In agreement with these observations, biochemical studies of isolated LDs have found that ER proteins, including luminal proteins like Bip, were co-puried with LD marker proteins. To examine if LD-associated Bip was in a sealed membranous compartment, we carried out a protease protection assay to determine whether the LD-associated Bip could be digested. Isolated total LDs were treated with the indicated concentrations of trypsin, re-isolated following treatment, and the proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. Total proteins resistant to digestion were monitored by Colloidal Blue staining (Fig.1A). Upon trypsin treatment the LD proteins, such as ADRP, Rab 5, and caveolin-1 (Cav-1), were partially or completely digested (Fig.1A). Rab 5 was more sensitive to trypsin digestion than Cav-1 and ADRP. In contrast, the LD-associated Bip was fully protected from digestion, suggesting that it was contained in an intact ER membrane structure that was stably associated with LDs. Similar results were obtained by using mouse liver LDs (Supplemental Fig. 1).
We next investigated whether the association between LDs and ER is based on ionic interaction. Isolated total LDs were incubated with 2 M NaCl and then re-isolated by centrifugation and washing. Since ADRP has been observed to associate with LDs via hydrophobic interactions44 and to bind phospholipids with high affinity45, it was used as a negative control. Indeed, ADRP could not be washed o by the treatment, only small amount of it detected in reaction solution (Fig.1B). Similar to ADRP, Bip was also removed only slightly, demonstrating that portions of ER membrane tightly associate with LDs and are not easily dissociated using ionic strength. The treatment had no eect on LD-associated Rab 5, Rab 18, or Cav-1 either (Fig.1B).
To explore potential heterogeneity in the LD population and to determine if there was a LD subpopulation not associated with ER membranes, total LDs puried by our standard method46 were further fractionated into 11 fractions by density gradient centrifugation as described in the Materials and Methods. Proteins in these fractions were extracted and analyzed by Western blotting and Colloidal Blue staining (Fig.1C). LDs were distributed throughout the gradient as marked by ADRP (Fig.1C). Marker proteins for mitochondria (Porin) and ER (Sec 61 and p62) were abundant in fractions 12. The remaining fractions were depleted in these marker proteins despite the presence of equivalent quantities of ADRP. No Porin, Sec 61, or p62 was detected in fractions 811. Interestingly, one fraction was completely depleted of Rab 11 (Fig.1C, lane 8) and the another was negative for Rab 5 (Fig.1C, lane 9). The results suggest the presence of distinct subpopulations of LDs including a pool of LDs almost free of ER and mitochondria.
Separation of lipid droplet subpopulations by size. The existence of LD fractions lacking detectable ER and mitochondrial marker proteins raised the possibility of obtaining a subpopulation of LDs that do not associate with the ER or mitochondria. Furthermore, the nding that these distinct groups of LDs could be separated by centrifugation indicates that these LD fractions have dierent physical properties, either related to size or density. Therefore, we developed a multi-step method to separate these populations by size. In this method we isolated total LDs and then separated the total LDs into three distinct subpopulations by dierential centrifugation, which we designate as Fractions 1 through 3, respectively (Fig.2). As we expected, the total LDs (Original) were successfully separated into three subpopulations by size (Fig.2A). Fraction 1 contained primarily large LDs (a few microns across) with some other adherent membrane structures, while Fraction 3 contained small LDs (less than a micron in diameter) and was almost free of other membrane structures (Fig.2A).
The three fractions had similar total protein proles except for Fraction 3 which had fewer high molecular weight proteins.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
2
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 1. Interaction between lipid droplets and intact ER and subpopulations of lipid droplets from CHO K2 cells. (A) Association of intact ER to LDs. Total LDs were isolated from CHO K2 cells and distributed into 12 aliquots. The aliquots were treated with trypsin at 37C at the concentration (%, w/v) and times indicated. Aer incubation, LDs were re-isolated, and proteins were extracted with chloroform:acetone (300l:700l)and analyzed by Colloidal Blue staining and Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (B) Treatment of LDs with high concentration salt. Isolated LDs were incubated with or without 2M NaCl in Buer B at 4C for 30min. Aer incubation the reaction was centrifuged at 20,000g for 3min. LDs layer (top) and the solution underneath (Solu) were collected respectively. LD proteins were extracted with acetone and the solution was mixed with 5 SDS sample buer (to nal concentration of 2 SDS sample buer). The proteins in LDs and solution were then analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (C) ER and mitochondrial proteins in LD subpopulations. The total LD fraction was isolated from CHO K2 cells, mixed with 2.5M sucrose to nal concentration of 1.25M, overlaid with a discontinuous sucrose density gradient, and the gradientwas centrifuged at 500g for 20min. Fractions from the top of the gradient, 1ml each, were collected, andthe proteins from those fractions were precipitated using trichloroacetic acid (nal concentration of 7.2%).
The precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Colloidal Blue or blotted with the indicated antibodies.
By Western blotting, Fraction 3 had no detectable Bip, Sec 61, or PDI (ER marker proteins) and no detectable Porin (mitochondrial marker protein), while Fraction 1 was enriched in Bip and Porin (Fig.2B). The biochemical distribution of ER and mitochondrial proteins was in agreement with the morphological ndings (Fig.2A). Fraction 3 also had less Cav-1 and Fraction 1 had substantially less Rab 4 (Fig.2B) than the other fractions.
Using the method, we successfully obtained three subpopulations of LDs with dierent sizes. Importantly, the small LDs we separated from CHO K2 cells did not contain detectable ER and mitochondrial marker proteins, suggesting that they were not associated with these cellular organelles. To determine if there were functional dierences among these fractions, we took advantage of in vitro assay that we established previously to examine the cytosolic protein recruitment ability of these subpopulations36. The LDs in the three fractions were incubated with cytosol in the presence or absence of GTPs, re-isolated and washed, and analyzed for specic proteins. The LDs in all of the fractions could recruit Rab proteins, ARF1 and COP (Fig.2C). However, those in Fraction 3 were not able to recruit GAPDH like the other fractions (Fig.2C).
Next, we carried out a proteomic study of the three LD subpopulations to determine how they may dier in protein composition. As shown in Supplemental Fig. 2, 141 proteins were identied by MS in the three LD fractions. Approximately 45% of the proteins (63 proteins) appeared in all three fractions while 20 proteins were only found in Fraction 1, 15 only in Fraction 2, and 11 only in Fraction 3. We also compared the relative abundance of certain proteins in the fractions by analyzing the number of identied peptides in each mass spectra
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
3
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 2. Subpopulation of lipid droplets with dierent sizes and protein compositions. Total LDs and cytosol were isolated from CHO K2 cells. The total LDs were further fractionated by size using dierential centrifugation (Materials and Methods). LD fractions 1, 2 and 3 were collected. (A) LD size of the subpopulations. LD fractions were processed for xation, dehydration and inltration, and nally embedded in Embed 812. Then the ultra-thin sections of the three fractions were prepared and analyzed by EM. Bar=1m. (B) ER and mitochondrial markers in the subpopulations. Proteins of these fractions were extracted with chloroform:acetone (300l:700l), separated using SDS-PAGE, analyzed by Western blotting (equal amountof protein per lane) with the indicated antibodies, and stained by Colloidal Blue. (C) Protein recruitment tothe subpopulation. These three fractions were incubated with Buer B (Con) or cytosol plus 1mM GTPs(C+ G) for 1h at 37C. LDs were then re-isolated and the proteins were extracted with acetone and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (D) Protein composition of the subpopulations. The proteins of the fraction 1 and 3 were extracted with chloroform:acetone (300l:700l) and analyzed by silver staining and Western blotting (equal amount of protein per lane) with the indicated antibodies.
(Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Fig. 3). As shown in Supplemental Table 1, the three fractions have the same number of peptide fragments of ADRP, which is consistent with Western blotting result (Fig.2B). This also allows ADRP to be used as an internal control. For both ER and mitochondrial resident proteins, a signicant decrease could be observed from Fractions 1 to 3 (Supplemental Fig. 3A,B). The MS result also showed that membrane trafficking proteins and lipid metabolic enzymes are rich in all of the three fractions (Supplemental Fig. 3C,D). Most of the enzymes in the Kennedy pathway for the synthesis of triacylglycerol and phospholipids appear in the MS data.
We performed more extensive analysis of the protein compositions of Fraction 1 and 3 by Western blotting (Fig.2D). With ADRP as a control, there was an obvious decrease of mitochondrial Tom20 and Tim23 in Fraction 3, further indicating a reduction in associated mitochondria. Estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 11 (17HSD11) and DHRS3 [dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 3], both belonging to short-chain dehydrogenases/
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
4
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 3. Separation of lipid droplet subpopulations from Huh7 cells by size. LDs from Huh7 cells were fractionated by size using dierential centrifugation (Materials and Methods). Four LD fractions were collected. (A) EM to determine LD size. Huh7 cells and the four LD fractions were xed, dehydrated and inltratedand nally embedded for ultra-thin sectioning. The 70nm ultra-thin sections were prepared, and the ultra-structures were analyzed by EM. (B) Protein composition of the subpopulations. Proteins of the four LD fractions were extracted with chloroform:acetone (300l:700l) and analyzed by silver staining and Western blotting (equal amount of protein per lane) with the indicated antibodies.
reductases (SDR) family, were enriched in Fraction 3. The small G-proteins, Rab 18 and transforming protein RhoA, were much more abundant in Fraction 3 than in Fraction 1. Proteins involved in lipid metabolism, including glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4 (GPAT4), lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 (LPCAT1), adi-pose triglyceride lipase (ATGL), and comparative gene identication-58 (CGI-58), were found to be on both of the LD populations with similar abundance. Two long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases, ACSL3 and ACSL4, showed dierent preferences to the two LD populations.
Together with the silver staining results shown in Fig.2D, these data demonstrate that our method is eective at obtaining distinct LD subpopulations with dierent sizes, compositions, functional characteristics, and degree of associated organelles.
Application of the method to other cells and tissues. We applied this method to Huh7 cells to determine if it could be used to fractionate LDs from other sources. To avoid disruption of huge LDs present in Huh7 cells, we did not isolate total LDs by centrifugation at 182,000g rst. In stead, dierent centrifugation speeds were applied rst to get all kinds of LDs and those LDs, except for Fraction 4, were combined together as a LD pool for further subpopulation. Similar to total LDs from CHO K2 cells, the LD pool were further separated into three subpopulations by dierential centrifugation, designated as Fractions 1 through 3 (Fig.3A). Using the method, the LDs in Huh7 were successfully separated into four subpopulations by size (Fig.3A). LDs in Fraction 1 were
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
more than 3 microns in diameter; most of LDs in Fraction 3 were less than 1 micron. Fraction 4 contained many small LDs. The pictures of the ultra structures of Huh7 cells and those isolated LDs suggested the preparation of the LD subpopulations reected the real and diverse state of LDs in a cell. Interestingly, there was always debris surrounding those small LDs in Fraction 4. Given a similar amount of ADRP among the four fractions, ER proteins would increase dramatically in Fraction 4 (Fig.3B). LAMP1, a lysosomal marker, showed dierent distributions among those fractions, suggesting the distinct interactions with lysosomes. 17HSD12 were enriched in Fraction 3 while Rab 4 and 5 were mainly in Fraction 4. Therefore, LDs from Huh7 cells were successfully separated by size and they exhibited dierent degree of associated organelles.
We further adapted the method to mammalian tissues. Similarly, to avoid disruption of the huge LDs present in those tissues, the dierential centrifugation method was applied directly to debris-claried homogenate rather than isolated total LDs. In addition, the centrifugation speeds and the density gradient required adjustment for successful fractionation. The detailed protocols are described in the Method section. The results largely recapitulate those obtained with the cell culture derived LDs (Fig.4). Using the method, we could fractionate LDs from mouse liver into dierent sizes with distinct protein proles (Fig.4A,B). Diameters of LDs in the four fractions were analyzed by a Delsa Nano C particle analyzer (Fig.4A). Fraction 1 contained LDs around 10m, while LDs in Fraction 4 were around 1 m. The smaller LD population had fewer proteins from other cellular organelles (Fig.4C). Since both TAG and cholesterol ester (CE) are abundant in liver and the results suggest the presence of distinct LD pools, we analyzed the lipid proles of the isolated LD sub-populations. Indeed, the LD fractions had dierent lipid proles. Interestingly, some Fractions contained LDs lacking CE while others were enriched in this neutral lipid class (Fig.4D). In contrast, the LDs from CHO K2 cells had similar neutral lipid compositions among the isolated Fractions (Fig.4E). These data suggest that the heterogeneity among these LD fractions based on this method is probably due to the size and not due to the lipid composition.
We also adapted the method to brown adipose tissue. As with the other starting materials, the LDs from BAT were separated into LDs of dierent sizes (Fig.5A). Fraction 1 contained LDs more than 4 microns while Fraction 3 was consisted of LDs less than 1 micron. The fractions exhibited dierent connections with ER or lysosomes (Fig.5B). Interestingly, unlike the CHO K2 or liver LD subpopulations, which had similar quantities of ADRP, the LD fractions from BAT diered dramatically in the content of Perilipin 1 (PLIN1). Furthermore, the LD fractions had dierent quantities of UCP1, a mitochondrial inner membrane protein as well as a marker of activated mitochondria. Together the data show the method can fractionate LDs in BAT into dierent fractions with various sizes and functions.
- LDs have been shown to have lipid synthetic activity in vitro1. However, since most routinely isolated LDs contain substantial associated ER membrane, the role of LDs themselves in lipid synthesis remains debatable. Using this method we are able to isolate a sub-population of LDs from CHO K2 cells (Fraction 3) that contain triacylglycerol and phospholipid synthetic enzymes, but are nearly depleted in adherent organelles (Fig.2D). Therefore, this permits an excellent test of the native lipid synthetic capacity of LDs. Using radio-labeled precursors, we tested the ability of Fraction 3 LDs in CHO K2 cells to synthesize lipids in vitro.
To assay for lipid synthetic activity, radio-labeled oleic acid (OA) in ethanol was dried under a stream of nitrogen. LDs were added to the tube and incubated to allow incorporation. Then, ATP and isolated cytosol were added and the reaction was incubated at 37 C. Aer incubation, LDs were re-isolated and washed by centrifugation and the lipids were extracted and analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Bands corresponding to lipid standards were collected and the radioactivity was counted. The results presented in Fig.6A demonstrate that LDs nearly depleted of ER are capable of incorporating fatty acids into phospholipids in vitro in a cytosol dependent manner. Then, using the same assay, we were able to determine that Coenzyme A (CoA) was the factor in cytosol required for the activity. Thus CoA could substitute for cytosol in supporting in vitro lipid synthesis (Fig.6B). Next, the optimal ATP concentration required to support the reaction was determined (Fig.6C).
Once optimal conditions to support lipid synthesis had been determined, the kinetics of synthesis of phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and TAG were measured (Fig.6DF). The incorporation of [3H]OA had biphasic kinetics with an initial rapid phase lasting about 15minutes and a slower linear incorporation phase. These results indicate that the LD-associated lipid synthetic enzymes were active and LDs are one site of lipid synthesis in cells.
Discussion
The low density of LDs makes them easy to be separated from other membranous structures using centrifugation. However, LDs have been demonstrated to have direct contact with other organelles, especially the ER. ER marker proteins and non-LD membrane structures are routinely detected in preparations of puried LDs. Previously, Jacquier et al. found that LDs are functionally connected to the ER membrane, with this connection allowing for the efficient partitioning of membrane proteins between the two compartments11. Our nding in Fig.1 shows that ER lumenal proteins Bip was protected from trypsin digestion of a LD preparation, further suggesting that the tight association between LDs and intact ER could not be separated under such condition.
The study of LDs is complicated by their close association with other organelles and their heterogeneity in size. Therefore, isolation and separation of LDs by size and by their association with other organelles are very essential for study of the organelle. Using dierential centrifugation of a density gradient, we were able to separate puried LDs into three fractions with dierent droplet sizes, which diered in the association with other membrane structures (Fig.2). This method is rapid, simple and reproducible. Furthermore, this method can also be used with minor adaptations to separate subpopulation of LDs from other sources such as Huh7 cells, mouse liver and brown adipose tissue (Figs35). Besides, as indicated by the lipid proles of various LDs from mouse liver and
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
6
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 4. Separation and neutral lipid analysis of lipid droplet subpopulations from mouse liver. LDs from mouse liver were fractionated by size using dierential centrifugation (Materials and Methods). Four LD fractions were collected. (A) LD size of the subpopulations. LD fractions were viewed under light microscope (upper panel). The LDs were incubated with 1% Triton for 30min to reduce aggregation. Aer removing Triton, the LDs were viewed and the images were acquired at 400-fold magnication. The LD size was measured by a Delsa Nano C particle analyzer. (B) Protein prole of the subpopulations. The proteins of LD subpopulations were extracted and analyzed by silver staining. (C) ER and mitochondrial markers in the subpopulations. Proteins from the subpopulations were analyzed by Western blotting with indicated antibodies (equal amount of protein per lane). (D,E) Neutral lipid analysis. Lipids of the subpopulations from mouse liver (panel D) and CHO K2 cells (panel E) were separated by TLC with a solvent of n-hexane-diethyl ether-acetic acid (80:20:1, v/v/v). TLC plate was then stained in iodine vapor aer being dried at room temperature.
CHO K2 (Fig.4), the resulting distinct LD fractions through this method probably attributes to LD size rather than LD lipid composition.
The LD fraction containing the smaller LDs was largely free of contamination by membranes and proteins from other organelles (Figs2A,B and 4A,C), which is in agreement with previous studies that ER membranes interact primarily with large LDs in vivo10,39. It should be noted, however, that this phenotype by using this method may not be the case for fatty tissues (such as BAT, white adipose tissue, fatty liver, fatty heart), in which supersized LDs ll a cell, even though LDs from BAT could also be separated into dierent fractions with distinct sizes (Fig.5). Besides, Blouin et al. found that caveolin-1-coated LDs were much larger than caveolin-1-devoid LDs in vivo by confocal study47, which is consistent with our current in vitro result (Fig.2B). Also for Huh7 cells, dierent sizes of LDs with distinct interactions with lysosome and protein proles were separated by this method
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
7
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 5. Separation of lipid droplet subpopulations from mouse brown adipose tissue by size. LDsfrom mouse BAT were fractionated by size using dierential centrifugation (Materials and Methods). FourLD fractions were collected. (A) EM to determine LD size. The four LD fractions were processed for positive staining and the sizes of the LDs were analyzed by EM. Bar=2m. (B) Protein prole of the subpopulations. Proteins of LD subpopulations were extracted with chloroform:acetone (300l:700l) and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies and silver staining (equal amount of protein per lane).
(Fig.3). According to our results, Fraction 4 from Huh7 cells contained very small LDs and most of them were surrounded by debris (Fig.3). Biochemical analysis indicated they were abundant in ER proteins. These data agree with the current point that LDs come from ER membrane and the newly-formed small LDs should be ER-connected11,40. Another possibility is that the real small LDs may be connected with ER membrane thus never be able to oat to the top of gradient.
We further observed that dierences in LD size were associated with distinct functions as suggested by their dierential recruitment of cytosolic proteins (Fig.2C). LDs of dierent sizes have dierent surface curvatures, which may require specic phospholipids and protein compositions to maintain their structures. These dierences in lipid and protein compositions may also be associated with distinct functions.
A great number of lipid metabolic enzymes have been reported to localize to LDs. This was also the case in the current study and most of the enzymes were found to have a similar abundance on all LD subpopulations. However, two long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases, ACSL3 and ACSL4, were heterogeneously distributed among the LD populations (Fig.2D). Knockdown of the two enzymes in hepatocytes showed totally dierent eects on the incorporation of fatty acids into phosphatidylcholine and ultimately, the assembly of very low density lipoprotein48.
Dierent ACSL isoforms can direct fatty acids and their synthetic products towards distinct metabolic pathways49.
All suggest that the subpopulations of LDs that we obtained were functionally distinct.
As shown in Fig.2B,D, small G-proteins including Rho and Rab family proteins were enriched in the smaller LDs in Fraction 3. Small G-proteins are very active in cellular processes, including cell proliferation, cytoskeletal dynamics, and vesicle transport. The preferential distribution of these G-proteins to small LDs indicates that the small LDs in a cell may be more active in those cellular functions than larger LDs. Rab 18 was among the proteins enriched in the small LD population. It has been reported that Rab 18 labeled a distinct subset of LDs in both adipocytes and non-adipocytes and the regulation of the recruitment was shown to rely on the metabolic state of the LDs9. However, the exact molecular mechanism underlining how Rab 18 was recruited to specic LD populations
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
8
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 6. Fatty acid incorporation in ER-reduced lipid droplet subpopulations. LDs and cytosol were isolated from CHO K2 cells, and the LDs were further separated into three subpopulations using dierential centrifugation (Materials and Methods). Fraction 3, the LD subpopulation nearly depleted of ER, was used for an in vitro fatty acid incorporation assay. The faction 3 LDs had rst been incubated with [3H]OA and unlabeled OA at 4C for 6h. (A) Requirement of ATP and cytosol for fatty acid incorporation. The OA-associated LDs were then aliquoted and incubated with 2mM ATP alone or 100l cytosol in the presence or absence of 2mM ATP at 37C for 2h.(B) Requirement of ATP and CoA for fatty acid incorporation. The OA-associated LDs were then aliquoted and incubated with 2mM CoA alone or the indicated concentrations of CoA (mM) in the presence or absence of 2mM ATP at 37C for 2h. (CF) Time-dependent fatty acid incorporation. The OA-associated LDs were then aliquoted and incubated with the indicated concentration of ATP (M) at 37C for 2h in the presence of 100l cytosol(C), or with 2mM ATP in the presence or absence of 2mM CoA at 37C for the indicated times (DF). Aer incubation, LDs were re-isolated, washed 3 times with Buer B, and lipids extracted with acetone:chloroform(2:1, v/v) and separated using TLC. The bands of phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and triacylglycerol (TAG) were scraped from TLC plate and counted with scintillation uid.
was unclear. Our method for isolating LDs enriched or depleted in Rab 18 may provide a powerful tool to address the mechanism, perhaps leading to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying metabolic diseases.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
9
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
The SDR family proteins are present in all living organisms and have important roles in the control of cellular metabolism50,51. Our recent results showed that 17HSD13, localized on LDs, is a pathogenic protein in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease52. The enrichment of SDR family proteins on the cellular organelle-depleted LD subpopulation suggests that SDR proteins are LD-residents (Fig.2D). In support of this notion, proteomic studies on LDs from almost all sources, such as liver52, skeletal muscle5, brown adipose tissue53, plant54, C. elegans55, Drosophila56, yeast57, and bacteria20, identied SDR proteins on LDs. For example, in C. elegans, a short-chain dehydrogenase DHS-3 is one of the main proteins of LDs and it exclusively localizes on LDs55.
Using the method we developed the LDs isolated from mouse liver could be separated into fractions relatively enriched in CE or TAG (Fig.4). This nding provides the groundwork to search for a marker protein to dierentiate these populations, which could facilitate research into the metabolism of TAG and CE. This may provide valuable insights into the involvement of the liver in metabolic diseases.
In our experiments with BAT, we found that the mitochondrial inner membrane protein UCP1 was well represented in all three LD fractions, making it quite distinct from ER and lysosomal marker proteins. This indicates that LDs and mitochondria are especially tightly associated in this tissue type (Fig.5). This result is consistent with our recent nding that BAT LDs are physiologically bound to mitochondria. Even when treated with high concentration salt, detergent or proteinase, BAT LDs still tightly associated with intact mitochondria53. The varying proportional representation of dierent mitochondrial proteins in the three LD fractions suggests that there may be important functional distinctions among the mitochondria that are bound to dierent LD populations. This is an intriguing possibility that could deserve further investigation.
The ER is a site of lipid ester synthesis15,26, but LDs have also recently been proposed to be a synthetic site for a number of lipids2. There have been several reports on lipid synthesis or enzymatic activities in isolated LDs2630. However, in those studies, fatty acids dissolved in ethanol were added directly to the reactions, a procedure which results in a limited amount of this hydrophobic substrate being available for the reaction taking place in an aqueous environment. Our experiments using a method in which LDs recruited fatty acids from the reaction tube prior to initiating the reaction and allowing LDs to incorporate the substrate directly. Using this method we determined that only ATP and CoA were required to support lipid synthesis in this system (Fig.6B).
The fatty acid incorporation measured in these in vitro reactions exhibited saturation kinetics, supporting the conclusion that enzymes localized to LDs are responsible for this reaction and suggesting our assay is eective. The reaction exhibited biphasic kinetics (Fig.6) suggesting that a pre-existing pool of lysophospholipids and diacylglycerol were present on the LDs that support the initial, rapid phase. This conclusion is in agreement with our previous report37. Exhaustion of these intermediates results in a dramatic slowing of the reaction as an earlier synthetic reaction becomes the rate limiting step. If true, this is consistent with the LD as a lipid factory, providing not just the raw materials, but also the enzymatic capacity to actively participate in lipid synthesis.
It has been difficult to reach a denitive conclusion regarding the role of LDs in lipid synthesis due to the presence of adherent ER membrane in standard preparations. In this study, we found that the distinct LD populations showed no obvious dierences in the abundance of lipid metabolic enzymes (Fig.2D). However, we were able to prepare a LD fraction lacking any signicant contamination by ER or other organelle membrane. These LDs were able to incorporate radio-labeled fatty acids into phospholipids and neutral lipids (Fig.6). It is hard to exclude the existence of trace amount of ER in this fraction; however, the obvious decrease of many ER proteins in this fraction suggests its self-sustaining state (Fig.2 and MS data). Acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) is the key enzyme catalyzing the synthesis of TAG in eukaryotic organisms. Interestingly, MS data showed there were no DGATs in this fraction. Impressively, we found that aer knockout of both DGATs in C2C12 cells about 10% TAG was still in the cells compared to wild type (unpublished data). These data suggest that LDs contain another acyltransferase activity for triacylglycerol synthesis. Recently, McFie et al. found that when the localization of DGAT2 was disrupted, DGAT2 was still able to promote TAG synthesis without interaction with the ER. They concluded that TAG synthesis and LD formation do not require the presence of DGAT2 in the ER in HEK-293T and COS-7 cells58. This nding also indicates that the LD may be another important site for lipid metabolism.
A prominent hypothesis holds that LDs increase in size by fusion of smaller LDs59. However, our discovery of the incorporation of fatty acids into lipids on the LD suggests that LDs may be able to grow through in situ lipid synthesis, although more evidence will be required to reach this conclusion. Interestingly, Walthers group also found that LDs grew when TAG synthesis enzymes relocalized from ER to LDs40.
Our method successfully separates LDs by size and produces fractions that vary in their association with other organelle membranes. The method can be applied successfully to LDs from several tissue and cell sources. The biochemical isolation of LDs with dierent sizes may help to elucidate any distinct roles of large and small LDs in biological processes. The method will also permit the determination of the protein and lipid composition of LDs almost without interference by ER or other organelle components. This will facilitate investigation into the unique biology of LDs as well as the relationship between LD and other organelles. Furthermore, our method for studying LD-mediated lipid synthesis in vitro is more eective and efficient than previously described approaches. Using our purication process, we have provided clear evidence that LDs have a native capacity to synthesize lipids independent of the ER or other organelles.
Materials and Methods
Materials. Calf serum and DMEM were from Hyclone. Penicillin-Streptomycin solution (100) and Colloidal Blue Staining Kit were from Life Technologies. ECL Western Blotting Substrate was from Thermo Scientic.
ADRP monoclonal antibody (mAb) was from Dr. Ginette Serreros group. Cav-1 polyclonal antibody (pAb), mAbs against Rab 5, Bip, p62, Rab 11, PDI, Rab 4 and Tim23 were purchased from BD Biosciences. pAbs against Rab 18 and Sec 61, mAbs against Porin and GAPDH were from Millipore. ARF1 mAb was from Santa Cruz.
COP mAb was from Sigma. Tom20 pAb and RhoA mAb were from Santa Cruz Biotech. 17HSD11 mAb
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
10
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
and CPT1a mAb were from abcam. 17HSD12 pAb was from Thermo Scientic. pAb against DHRS3, ACSL4, GPAT4, LPCAT1, Reep5 and CGI-58 were from ABclonal Technology. pAb against ACSL3 was from Proteintech. pAb against ATGL and mAb against LAMP1 were from Cell Signaling Technology. UCP1mAb was a gi from Dr. Peng Li. PLIN1pAb was a gi from Dr. Guoheng Xu.
GTPs was from Millipore. Proline, PMSF, oleic acid, lipid standard, ATP, Coenzyme A sodium salt sodium salt hydrate and tannic acid were from Sigma. 25% glutaraldehyde solution (EM grade), Embed 812 kit, uranyl acetate and lead citrate were from Electron Microscopy Sciences. Osmium tetraoxide (EM grade) was purchased from Nakalai Tesque. Formvar was from BDH Chemicals. [9,10-3H(N)]-oleic acid (OA) (5 mCi/ml) was from PerkinElmer Life Sciences.
CHO K2 cells were cultured in 150 mm dishes in high glucose DMEM containing 10% calf serum, 40g/ml proline, 100U/ml penicillin and 100g/ml streptomycin at 37C with 5% CO2. The cells were cultured until conuent and the culture medium was refreshed 12h before isolation of LDs.
Total LDs were isolated from CHO K2 cells according to the protocol previously described46. Briey, cells from twenty 150 mm dishes were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and were then collected by scraping them into ice-cold PBS. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 10 min at 4 C, resuspended in Buer A (20 mM tricine, 250 mM sucrose, pH 7.8) containing 0.5 mM PMSF and kept on ice for 20 min. The cell suspension was pressurized to 35 bar with N2 and held on ice for 15 minutes, followed by homogenization by cavitation. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 min at 4 C and the supernatant was transferred into SW 40 Ti tubes. Then 2ml of Buer B (20 mM HEPES, 100mM KCl, 2mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) was loaded onto the top of the supernatant and the gradient was centrifuged at 182,000g for 1h at 4C. The top band was collected to a 1.5ml microcentrifuge tube, which was the Total LDs for further subpopulation. Part of the preparation was centrifuged at 20,000 g for 3 min at 4 C. The solution underneath the white band was removed and the LDs were resuspended in 200l of Buer B, and then centrifuged again. This step was repeated 3 to 4 times until no pellet was visualized. The resulting droplet fraction was dened as original LDs.
1 ml of total LD solution (~200 g protein) was mixed with 1 ml of 2.5 M sucrose in a SW 40 Ti tube by gentle vortexing. The LD solution was overlaid sequentially with 4ml of 625mM sucrose in Buer B, 2ml of 313mM sucrose in Buer B, and 4ml Buer B. The gradient was centrifuged at 500 g for 20 min. Aer centrifugation, fractions were collected from the top of the gradient, 1ml each, and proteins of these fractions were precipitated using 7.2% trichloroacetic acid and blotted by indicated antibodies.
0.8 ml of 2.5 M sucrose was mixed with 1ml of total LDs (~200 g protein) and then adjusted to a nal sucrose concentration of 500 mM with Buer B. The LD solution (4ml) was transferred to a SW 40 Ti tube and overlaid with 4ml of 250mM sucrose in Buer B and 4ml Buer B, sequentially. The gradient was centrifuged at 500g for 40min. The white band on the top was carefully collected in 100l using a 200l pipette and transferred into a 1.5ml microcentrifuge tube (Fraction 1). Then 100l Buer B was added to balance the SW 40 Ti tube and the gradient was centrifuged again at 2,000g for 20min and then at 8,000g for 20min at 4C successively. The top bands were collected as Fraction 2 and 3 respectively. The collected three LD preparations were centrifuged at 20,000g at 4C for 3min. The underlying solution was removed with a gel-loading tip. The resulting preparations were ready to be analyzed.
Isolation of cytosol. During purication of the total LDs, 1ml of the solution from the middle of the gradient in the SW 40 Ti tube was taken and then centrifuged in a TLA100.3 rotor at 270,000 g for 1 h at 4 C. The supernatant was collected and was used directly without freezing.
Total LD preparation (50 l, equivalent to 10 g protein) was incubated with 0, 0.0125%, 0.025% or 0.05% of trypsin at 37C for 10min, 90min or 120min. Reactions were vortexed slightly every 10min. Aer the incubation the reactions were centrifuged at 20,000g for 3min and the buer underneath was removed. Then LDs were collected and washed with Buer B 3 times and LD proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with indicated antibodies.
50 l of total LDs (~10 g protein) were incubated in 200 l Buer B alone or Buer B containing 2 M NaCl. Samples were kept at 4 C for 30 min, vortexed gently every 10min, and then centrifuged at 20,000g for 3min. The LD layer was collected and proteins were precipitated with acetone and subjected to Western blotting. The buer underneath LDs was also collected and mixed with 5SDS sample buer (to a concentration of 2 SDS sample buer) then analyzed by Western blotting.
50 l of LD preparation (~10 g protein) was incubated in 100 l Buer B alone or in 100l of cytosol (~80g protein) in Buer B plus 1mM GTPs for 1h at 37C. The reaction system was vortexed gently every 10min. LDs were then re-isolated by centrifugation at 20,000g for 3min and washed with Buer B 5 times. LD proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with indicated antibodies.
Protein preparation, Western blotting, and lipid analysis. Following the removal of the suspension buer, LDs were treated with chloroform-acetone (300 l:700 l) at room temperature. The tubes were strongly vortexed and then centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min. The pelleted proteins were dissolved in 2 SDS sample buer and separated with 10% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were then either analyzed by Colloidal Blue staining
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
11
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
or silver staining or transferred to a PVDF membrane, blotted with indicated antibodies and detected with the ECL system. The organic supernatant was transferred to a new tube and evaporated under a stream of nitrogen and analyzed with TLC, developing solvent of hexane-diethyl ether-acetic acid (80:20:1, v/v/v). TLC plates were stained in iodine vapor aer drying at room temperature.
Similar to CHO K2 cells, conuent Huh 7 cells from forty 100 mm dishes were washed, collected and resuspended in Buer A as described above. Aer 20min on ice, the cells were homogenised by cavitation. The homogenate was centrifuged at 500g for 5min at 4 C to remove the cell debris. The resulting supernatant was loaded into a SW 40 Ti tube with around 2 ml Buer B on the top and then was centrifuged at 500g for 20min. The white band was collected with a 200l pipette tip. Subsequently, the tube was centrifuged at 2000g for 20min, 8000g for 20min and 182,000g for 40min. Each top white band was collected and the one collected aer the last centrifugation was kept and named Fraction 4. The other three bands were mixed together. This mixture was transferred into a SW 40 Ti tube and 2.5M sucrose was added to a nal concentration of 500mM in Buer B, 4ml in total. 4ml of 250mM sucrose in Buer B and 4 ml Buer B were loaded sequentially. This gradient was centrifuged at 500g for 20 min, 2000 g for 20 min and 8000g for 20min sequentially. Aer each centrifugation, LDs were carefully collected in a minimal volume with a 200l pipette tip and an equal volume of Buer B was added to the top. The three fractions collected were designated as Fraction 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
Isolation and subpopulation of lipid droplets from mouse Liver. Mice were purchase from Vital River Laboratories. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences under the permission number SCXK (SPF2009_111). All experimental methods were carried out in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Eighth Edition). Three 10-week-old male C57/L6 mice were sacriced by cervical dislocation. Livers were collected and rinsed by ice-cold PBS twice with the gall bladders discarded. The connective tissues were carefully removed. The livers were transferred into 20 ml ice-cold Buer A containing 0.5 mM PMSF and then sliced into small pieces around 1 mm3 by tweezers. The prepared liver tissues were homogenized with a loose-tting glass-Teon Dounce homogenizer by 1520 passes on ice.
The homogenate was centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min to remove tissue debris and blood cells. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube. Care was taken to collect any white or pale yellow material at the top of the tube. Then 8.5ml of the supernatant was loaded into a SW 40 Ti tube. 3ml of Buer B was overlaid on the top carefully without disturbing the supernatant. The gradient was centrifuged at 500g for 20min at 4C. The white band on the top was collected in a minimal volume into a 1.5ml microcentrifuge tube (Fraction 1) with a 200l pipette tip.
An equal volume of Buer B was layered on the top of the gradient to balance the tube and the tube was centrifuged again at 2,000 g for 20 min at 4 C, followed by collection of the droplets at the top of the gradient (Fraction 2). LDs were collected again aer centrifugation at 8,000g for 20 min (Fraction 3) and 182,000 g for 20 min (Fraction 4). The four collected LD preparations were centrifuged at 4 C for 4 min at the force used to acquire them. The underlying solution and pellet was removed using a 200 l gel loading pipette tip. To the remaining LDs 200l Buer B was added and the LDs were gently suspended. The steps above were repeated until no pellet could be observed following centrifugation.
Isolation and subpopulation of lipid droplets from mouse brown adipose tissue. One 8-week-old male C57/L6 mice was sacriced by cervical dislocation. Brown adipose tissue was carefully dissected from between the scapulae, ensuring it was free of adhesive white fat tissue or other connective tissue. The tissues were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and transferred into 2.5ml ice-cold Buer A with 0.5mM PMSF, where they were minced into 23mm3 pieces with dissecting scissors. To homogenize, the minced tissues were passed through a stainless steel sieve (200 mesh, 70 micron) with the aid of a syringe plunger into a 1.5ml microcentrifuge tube. The tube was kept on ice for 20min. Aer that, the sample was centrifuged at 500g at 4C for 2min. The white band on the top was collected in a smallest possible volume of buer into a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube (Fraction 1) using a 200l pipette tip. Then the sample was centrifuged at 2,000g at 4C for 15min and again at 20,000g at 4C for 30 min successively. Following each centrifugation step, the white band at the top of the tube was collected as Fractions 2 and 3, respectively. The three collected LD preparations were centrifuged respectively at 4 C for 3 min at the force used to acquire them. The underlying solution and pellet were removed and discarded with a gel-loading tip. 200 l Buer B was added and LDs and they were gently suspended. The washing step was repeated until no pellet could be observed.
Preparation for transmission electron microscopy study. Isolated LDs suspended in 100l Buer B were mixed with an equal volume of 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M PB (pH 7.4) and then incubated for 0.5h at room temperature. Then an equal volume of 2% OsO4 was added followed by incubation for 0.5h at room temperature.
Then xed LDs were collected by centrifugation and processed for dehydration and inltration and were nally embedded with Epon (Embed 812). Then, 70nm sections were prepared with a Leica EM UC6 Ultramicrotome. The sections were stained with 4% uranyl acetate for 15min at room temperature and then with 2% lead citrate for 5min. The samples were viewed with a JOEL 1200 or a Tecnai Spirit electron microscope.
Huh7 cells were rinsed with 0.1 M PB and then xed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 2h. Aer that, the cells were scraped into a 1.5ml microcentrifuge tube and post-xed with 1% (w/v) osmium tetraoxide (with 1% potassium ferrocyanide) for 1.5h at room temperature. The cells were then dehydrated, embedded and treated as described above. The ultra-thin sections were viewed with Tecnai Spirit electron microscope.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
12
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
The size of LDs was also examined by positive staining. A Formvar-covered copper grid was used to load LDs, with the grid placed on a drop of isolated LD suspension for 1min. Then the grid was then placed on a drop of 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (0.1M PB, pH 7.4) for 10min and subsequently on a drop of 2% osmium tetraoxide solution (0.1M PB, pH 7.4) for 10min to x the LDs. The LDs were then stained with 0.1% tannic acid for 10min and 2% uranyl acetate for 10min. Aer each step, the grid was washed 3 times with deionized water, 1min each time. The grids were nally viewed with Tecnai Spirit electron microscope.
Preparation of oleic acid. Oleic acid (OA) was mixed with ethanol to a concentration of 100mM. Then the mixture was sonicated on ice at 200W, 10s on and 3s o pulses, until the solution was milky and homogenous. The prepared OA stocks were kept at 4C.
In vitro assay of fatty acid incorporation by lipid droplets. 2 l of [3H]OA (10 Ci) and 1 l of 100 mM OA in ethanol were mixed thoroughly in a microcentrifuge tube and then dried under N2 at room temperature. Then LDs (~10 g protein) were added to the tube and incubated at 4 C for 6 h. Then, depending on the experiment, ATP, cytosol or CoA was added to the tube and incubated at 37 C for various times. Aer the incubation, LDs were re-isolated by centrifugation at 20,000 g for 3 min and washed with Buer B 3 times. Total lipids were extracted with acetone-chloroform (2:1, v/v) and analyzed by TLC with a developing solvent of chloroform-acetone-methanol-acetic acid-water (80:40:30:20:10, v/v/v/v/v) for phospholipids, and hexane-diethyl ether-acetic acid (80:20:1, v/v/v) for neutral lipids. TLC plates were stained in iodine vapor aer drying at room temperature. Bands corresponding to lipid standard separated on the same plate were scraped, collected and the radioactivity was measured using a Perkin Elmer scintillation counter.
1. Bozza, P. T., Magalhaes, K. G. & Weller, P. F. Leukocyte lipid bodies - Biogenesis and functions in inammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1791, 540551 (2009).
2. Suzuki, M., Shinohara, Y., Ohsaki, Y. & Fujimoto, T. Lipid droplets: size matters. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo) 60 Suppl 1, S101S116 (2011).
3. Samuel, V. T. & Shulman, G. I. Mechanisms for insulin resistance: common threads and missing links. Cell 148, 852871 (2012).4. Toth, I. E., Szabo, D. & Bruckner, G. G. Lipoproteins, lipid droplets, lysosomes, and adrenocortical steroid hormone synthesis: morphological studies. Microsc. Res. Tech. 36, 480492 (1997).
5. Zhang, H. et al. Proteome of skeletal muscle lipid droplet reveals association with mitochondria and apolipoprotein a-I. J. Proteome Res. 10, 47574768 (2011).
6. Pu, J. et al. Interactomic study on interaction between lipid droplets and mitochondria. Protein Cell 2, 487496 (2011).7. Liu, P., Bartz, R., Zehmer, J. K., Ying, Y. & Anderson, R. G. Rab-regulated membrane traffic between adiposomes and multiple endomembrane systems. Methods Enzymol. 439, 327337 (2008).
8. Zehmer, J. K. et al. A role for lipid droplets in inter-membrane lipid traffic. Proteomics 9, 914921 (2009).9. Martin, S., Driessen, K., Nixon, S. J., Zerial, M. & Parton, R. G. Regulated localization of Rab18 to lipid droplets: eects of lipolytic stimulation and inhibition of lipid droplet catabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 4232542335 (2005).
10. Ozeki, S. et al. Rab18 localizes to lipid droplets and induces their close apposition to the endoplasmic reticulum-derived membrane. J. Cell Sci. 118, 26012611 (2005).11. Jacquier, N. et al. Lipid droplets are functionally connected to the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 124, 24242437 (2011).
12. Zehmer, J. K. et al. Targeting sequences of UBXD8 and AAM-B reveal that the ER has a direct role in the emergence and regression of lipid droplets. J. Cell Sci. 122, 36943702 (2009).
13. Murphy, D. J. & Vance, J. Mechanisms of lipid-body formation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 109115 (1999).14. Hayashi, T. & Su, T. P. Intracellular dynamics of sigma-1 receptors (sigma(1) binding sites) in NG108-15 cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 306, 726733 (2003).
15. Berg, J. M., Tymoczko, J. L. & Stryer, L. The biosynthesis of membrane lipids and steroids In Biochemistry (edn. Fih) 10631072 (Freeman, W. H. 2002).
16. Goodman, J. M. Demonstrated and inferred metabolism associated with cytosolic lipid droplets. J. Lipid Res. 50, 21482156 (2009).17. Kienesberger, P. C. et al. Identication of an insulin-regulated lysophospholipase with homology to neuropathy target esterase. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 59085917 (2008).18. Bouchoux, J. et al. The proteome of cytosolic lipid droplets isolated from dierentiated Caco-2/TC7 enterocytes reveals cell-specic characteristics. Biol. Cell. 103, 499517 (2011).
19. Athenstaedt, K., Zweytick, D., Jandrositz, A., Kohlwein, S. D. & Daum, G. Identication and characterization of major lipid particle proteins of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 181, 64416448 (1999).
20. Ding, Y. et al. Identication of the major functional proteins of prokaryotic lipid droplets. J. Lipid Res. 53, 399411 (2012).21. Fujimoto, Y. et al. Identication of major proteins in the lipid droplet-enriched fraction isolated from the human hepatocyte cell line HuH7. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1644, 4759 (2004).
22. Yu, W. et al. Co-compartmentalization of MAP kinases and cytosolic phospholipase A2 at cytoplasmic arachidonate-rich lipid bodies. Am. J. Pathol. 152, 759769 (1998).
23. Moreira, L. S. et al. Cytosolic phospholipase A2-driven PGE2 synthesis within unsaturated fatty acids-induced lipid bodies of epithelial cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1791, 156165 (2009).
24. Seo, Y. K. et al. Genome-wide localization of SREBP-2 in hepatic chromatin predicts a role in autophagy. Cell Metab. 13, 367375 (2011).
25. Accioly, M. T. et al. Lipid bodies are reservoirs of cyclooxygenase-2 and sites of prostaglandin-E2 synthesis in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 68, 17321740 (2008).
26. Kuerschner, L., Moessinger, C. & Thiele, C. Imaging of lipid biosynthesis: how a neutral lipid enters lipid droplets. Traffic 9, 338352 (2008).
27. Fujimoto, Y. et al. Involvement of ACSL in local synthesis of neutral lipids in cytoplasmic lipid droplets in human hepatocyte HuH7. J. Lipid Res. 48, 12801292 (2007).28. Low, K. L. et al. Lipid droplet-associated proteins are involved in the biosynthesis and hydrolysis of triacylglycerol in Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 2166221670 (2010).
29. Sorger, D. & Daum, G. Synthesis of triacylglycerols by the acyl-coenzyme A:diacyl-glycerol acyltransferase Dga1p in lipid particles of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 184, 519524 (2002).
30. Moessinger, C., Kuerschner, L., Spandl, J., Shevchenko, A. & Thiele, C. Human lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferases 1 and 2 are located in lipid droplets where they catalyze the formation of phosphatidylcholine. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2133021339 (2011).
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
13
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
31. Umlauf, E. et al. Association of stomatin with lipid bodies. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2369923709 (2004).32. Brasaemle, D. L., Dolios, G., Shapiro, L. & Wang, R. Proteomic analysis of proteins associated with lipid droplets of basal and lipolytically stimulated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4683546842 (2004).
33. Natter, K. et al. The spatial organization of lipid synthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from large scale green uorescent protein tagging and high resolution microscopy. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 662672 (2005).
34. Katavic, V., Agrawal, G. K., Hajduch, M., Harris, S. L. & Thelen, J. J. Protein and lipid composition analysis of oil bodies from two Brassica napus cultivars. Proteomics 6, 45864598 (2006).
35. Beller, M. et al. Characterization of the Drosophila lipid droplet subproteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 10821094 (2006).36. Bartz, R. et al. Dynamic activity of lipid droplets: protein phosphorylation and GTP-mediated protein translocation. J. Proteome Res. 6, 32563265 (2007).
37. Bartz, R. et al. Lipidomics reveals that adiposomes store ether lipids and mediate phospholipid traffic. J. Lipid Res. 48, 837847 (2007).
38. Liu, P. et al. Chinese hamster ovary K2 cell lipid droplets appear to be metabolic organelles involved in membrane traffic. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 37873792 (2004).
39. Noviko, A. B., Noviko, P. M., Rosen, O. M. & Rubin, C. S. Organelle relationships in cultured 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. J. Cell Biol. 87, 180196 (1980).
40. Wiling, F. et al. Triacylglycerol Synthesis Enzymes Mediate Lipid Droplet Growth by Relocalizing from the ER to Lipid Droplets. Dev. Cell 24, 384399 (2013).
41. Markgraf, D. F. et al. An ER protein functionally couples neutral lipid metabolism on lipid droplets to membrane lipid synthesis in the ER. Cell Rep 6, 4455 (2014).
42. Murphy, D. J. The dynamic roles of intracellular lipid droplets: from archaea to mammals. Protoplasma 249, 541585 (2012).43. Welte, M. A. Proteins under new management: lipid droplets deliver. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 363369 (2007).44. Bickel, P. E., Tansey, J. T. & Welte, M. A. PAT proteins, an ancient family of lipid droplet proteins that regulate cellular lipid stores. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1791, 419440 (2009).
45. McIntosh, A. L., Storey, S. M. & Atshaves, B. P. Intracellular lipid droplets contain dynamic pools of sphingomyelin: ADRP binds phospholipids with high affinity. Lipids 45, 465477 (2010).
46. Ding, Y. et al. Isolating lipid droplets from multiple species. Nat. Protoc. 8, 4351 (2013).47. Blouin, C. M. et al. Lipid droplet analysis in caveolin-decient adipocytes: alterations in surface phospholipid composition and maturation defects. J. Lipid Res. 51, 945956 (2010).
48. Yao, H. & Ye, J. Long chain acyl-CoA synthetase 3-mediated phosphatidylcholine synthesis is required for assembly of very low density lipoproteins in human hepatoma Huh7 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 849854 (2008).
49. Ellis, J. M., Frahm, J. L., Li, L. O. & Coleman, R. A. Acyl-coenzyme A synthetases in metabolic control. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 21, 212217 (2010).
50. Kavanagh, K. L., Jornvall, H., Persson, B. & Oppermann, U. Medium- and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase gene and protein families: the SDR superfamily: functional and structural diversity within a family of metabolic and regulatory enzymes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 38953906 (2008).
51. Kallberg, Y., Oppermann, U. & Persson, B. Classication of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily using hidden Markov models. FEBS J. 277, 23752386 (2010).
52. Su, W. et al. Comparative proteomic study reveals 17beta-HSD13 as a pathogenic protein in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1143711442 (2014).
53. Yu, J. et al. Lipid droplet remodeling and interaction with mitochondria in mouse brown adipose tissue during cold treatment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1853, 918928 (2015).
54. Jolivet, P. et al. Protein composition of oil bodies from mature Brassica napus seeds. Proteomics 9, 32683284 (2009).55. Zhang, P. et al. Proteomic Study and Marker Protein Identication of Caenorhabditis elegans Lipid Droplets. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 317328 (2012).
56. Kuhnlein, R. P. The contribution of the Drosophila model to lipid droplet research. Prog. Lipid Res. 50, 348356 (2011).57. Zhu, Z. et al. Dynamics of the Lipid Droplet Proteome of the Oleaginous Yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides. Eukaryot. Cell 14, 252264 (2015).
58. McFie, P. J., Banman, S. L., Kary, S. & Stone, S. J. Murine Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase-2 (DGAT2) Can Catalyze Triacylglycerol Synthesis and Promote Lipid Droplet Formation Independent of Its Localization to the Endoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2823528246 (2011).
59. Olofsson, S. O. et al. Lipid droplets as dynamic organelles connecting storage and efflux of lipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1791, 448458 (2009).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. John Zehmer for his critical reading and manuscript revision. This work was supported by the grants from the Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China (Grant No. 2011CBA00906; Grant No. 2012DFG32160), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81471082; Grant No. 61273228; Grant No. 81270932; Grant No. U1402225; Grant No. 31301106; Grant No. 31000365; Grant No. 31571388).
Author Contributions
P.L. designed the project. S.Z., Y.W., L.C., Y.D., S.X., J.Y., Y.Y. and P.L. performed the experiments. S.Z. and P.L. wrote the manuscript. S.C. and G.S. helped with the manuscript revision. All authors have read and approved the nal manuscript.
Additional Information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/srep
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.
How to cite this article: Zhang, S. et al. Morphologically and Functionally Distinct Lipid Droplet Subpopulations. Sci. Rep. 6, 29539; doi: 10.1038/srep29539 (2016).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
14
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2016
Abstract
Lipid droplet (LD), a multi-functional organelle, is often found to associate with other cellular membranous structures and vary in size in a given cell, which may be related to their functional diversity. Here we established a method to separate LD subpopulations from isolated CHO K2 LDs into three different size categories. The subpopulation with smallest LDs was nearly free of ER and other membranous structures while those with larger LDs contained intact ER. These distinct subpopulations of LDs differed in their protein composition and ability to recruit proteins. This method was also applicable to LDs obtained from other sources, such as Huh7 cells, mouse liver and brown adipose tissue, et al. We developed an in vitro assay requiring only isolated LDs, Coenzyme A, and ATP to drive lipid synthesis. The LD subpopulation nearly depleted of ER was able to incorporate fatty acids into triacylglycerol and phospholipids. Together, our data demonstrate that LDs in a given cell are heterogeneous in size and function, and suggest that LDs are one of cellular lipid synthetic organelles.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer