ABSTRACT
Objective: to describe the profile of standardized oral drugs at a hospital unit and assess their adequacy for use via enteral feeding tubes, according to recommendations from the literature. Method: descriptive study, with data on drugs collected from the Pharmacy Service Dispensing System. Specific recommendations for the use of these drugs via enteral feeding tubes were found after searches in literary databases, books, manuals, guidelines and package insert collections. Results: among the 236 dispensed oral drugs, 86% were in solid form; of those, 32 were "non-crushable", with the liquid form available at the institution. Twenty-eight drugs with potential interactions with enteral nutrition were identified. Sixty percent of those presented specific recommendations on their administration via enteral feeding tube. Conclusion: the joint participation of multidisciplinary nutritional therapy and care teams and the implementation of programs for continuous training are suggested strategies for the prevention of potential problems in the administration of drugs in the hospital setting.
Descriptors: Pharmaceutical Preparations; Catheters; Enteral Nutrition; Food-drug Interaction; Patient Safety.
RESUMO
Objetivo: descrever o perfil de medicamentos orais padronizados em uma unidade hospitalar e verificar sua adequaçào quanto ao uso por cateteres enterais, de acordo com recomendaçôes da literatura. Método: estudo descritivo, com dados sobre medicamentos coletados do Sistema de Dispensaçào do Serviço de Farmácia. As recomendaçôes específicas para uso de tais medicamentos por cateteres enterais foram obtidas após busca em bases literárias, livros, manuais, guidelines e bulários. Resultados: dos 236 medicamentos orais dispensados, 86% estavam na forma sólida; destes, 32 eram "nào trituráveis", havendo disponibilidade da forma líquida na instituiçào. Foram identificados 28 medicamentos com potenciais interaçôes com a nutriçào enteral. Sessenta porcento deles apresentavam recomendaçôes específicas sobre sua administraçào por cateter enteral. Conclusâo: a participaçào conjunta das equipes multidisciplinares de terapia nutricional e de assistência e a implementaçào de programas para treinamento continuo constituem estratégias sugeridas para a prevençào de potenciais problemas na administraçào de medicamentos no espaço hospitalar.
Descritores: Preparaçôes Farmacéuticas; Cateteres; Nutriçào Enteral; Interaçào Alimento-Droga; Segurança do Paciente.
RESUMEN
Objetivo: describir el perfil de medicamentos orales estandarizados en una unidad hospitalaria y verificar su adecuación respecto del uso vía sondas gástricas, según recomendaciones de la literatura. Método: estudio descriptivo, con datos sobre medicamentos recolectados del Sistema de Dispensación del Servicio de Farmacia. Las recomendaciones específicas de uso por sondas gástricas fueron obtenidas por búsqueda en bases de literatura, libros, manuales, guidelines y vademécums. Resultados: De los 236 medicamentos orales dispensados, 86% se presentaban en forma sólida; de ellos, 32 eran "no triturables", existiendo disponibilidad de la forma líquida en la institución. Fueron identificados 28 medicamentos con potenciales interacciones con la nutrición enteral. El 60% incluía recomendaciones específicas sobre administración por sonda gástrica. Conclusión: la participación conjunta de equipos multidisciplinarios de terapia nutricional y de atención y la implementación de programas de capacitación permanente constituye estrategias sugeridas para prevenir potenciales problemas en administración de medicamentos en el ámbito hospitalario.
Descriptores: Preparaciones Farmacéuticas; Catéteres; Nutrición Enteral; Interacción Alimento-Droga; Seguridad del Paciente.
INTRODUCTION
Drug preparation and administration are very important daily practices in hospital institutions. Patients under enteral nutrition through enteral feeding tubes frequently receive medication via those devices, since it is a more physiological method. However, it is not free of complications. Drug administration via enteral feeding tubes often disregards the products' license terms, with implications for workers involved in the prescription, dispensation and administration of the substance, making them responsible for any adverse events that might happen. For example, when tablets are crushed before administration, the manufacturer is no longer liable for any adverse events that happen(1). Moreover, errors in the crushing process may cause tube obstruction, drug contamination, changes or inactivation of the desired effects of the drug or nutrient, possibly compromising the enteral nutrition therapy and the effectiveness and safety of the pharmacological therapy(2).
Although literature presents evidences of benefits in the administration of oral drugs via enteral feeding tubes®, in order to correctly conduct this process without harming patients, it is necessary that all institutions have qualified and trained multi-professional teams(4)"publisher-place":"Belo Horizonte","genre":"Monografia de especializaçâo em farmácia clínica e serviços de saúde","eventplace":"Belo Horizonte","abstract":"As diversas desvantagens da administraçao de medicamentos juntamente com NutriçâoXnEnteral (NE for the discussion and standardization of technical and care procedures, which should be adapted to the new practices, and the adoption of new knowledge.
Critical analysis of therapy options available at Brazilian hospitals, as well as possible issues associated with administration via enteral feeding tubes, may contribute to the improvement of techniques that are adequate and safe for patients.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to describe the profile of oral drugs used at an infectious disease hospital unit and assess their adequacy for use via enteral feeding tubes.
METHOD
Ethical aspects
According to standards and guidelines of Resolution No. 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council®, because of the adopted method, this study was exempt from appreciation by the research ethics committee of the institution.
Design, study location and period
This is a descriptive, exploratory study conducted at the Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases - Fiocruz, a reference hospital unit for the treatment of infectious diseases, located in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Data on drugs were collected from the Computer Dispensing System and from the Drug Storage Control of the Pharmacy Service, considering the hospital formulary oral drugs dispensed for hospitalized patients between January 211 and January 2013.
Sample and inclusion and exclusion criteria
Drugs were selected and included in the study according to the average quantity of units dispensed monthly (average monthly consumption, AMC). The authors opted to exclude oral drugs with zero dispensation in the described period. After selection, drugs were organized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system of World Health Organization (ATC - WHO)(6), and each drug presentation characteristics were described, such as dosage forms and pharmaceutical formulation.
Study protocol
Based on drugs previously identified, we conducted a bibliographical review in the databases Medline, Lilacs and Scielo, using the following terms: enteral nutrition and drugs; enteral feeding tube and drug administration; drugs and enteral feeding tube. Selection criteria included articles, essays and theses published in Portuguese, English and Spanish, with abstracts available at the aforementioned databases and published between 1999 and 2013; that addressed drug preparation and administration via enteral feeding tubes in adults. Drug descriptions were analyzed through the electronic package insert collection of the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA)(7), as well as dissertations available at MICROMEDEX®, books, manuals from other health institutions0-11 and guidelines from international societies02"11.
Analysis of results and statistics
Drugs selected by AMC were described according to therapeutic class and dosage form. Based on a literature review, solid oral drugs that could be switched for liquid dosage forms, solid drugs that could not be crushed, drugs with potential interaction with enteral nutrition and drugs whose preparation and administration methods were different from others were identified. These data were entered in a Microsoft® Office Excel 2007 spreadsheet and descriptively analyzed.
RESULTS
A final list was obtained from the compilation that derived from the list of hospital formulary drugs. That final list contained 236 drugs dispensed to the hospital center in the two-year period. Considering level one in the ATC classification, 12 different drugs classes were found (Figure 1).
Anti-infective drugs for systemic use, drugs that act on the nervous system, on the cardiovascular system and on metabolism and alimentary tract were the classes with the highest AMC, encompassing 88% of total dispensed units. Anti-infective drugs for systemic use was the most frequent class and, within that class, antiretrovirals can be highlighted, with approximately 60% of AMC. Tuberculosis drugs also stood out, such as isoniazid pyrazinamide and ethambutol, comprising 15.2% of the anti-infectives for systemic use class.
The class of drugs that act on the nervous system was responsible for approximately 19% of total dispensed units and, inside that class, antiepileptics (37.4%) and anxiolytics (27.3%) stood out. Drugs that act on the cardiovascular system had 18% of AMC; of those, 59% were inhibitors for angiotensin converting enzyme.
Regarding dosage forms, 86% (204) of dispensed drugs were solid. Of those, 17% were available in liquid form at the institution, 11% were available in Brazil's pharmaceutical market, with the remaining 147 solid drugs with no liquid form version. Ten drugs in liquid pharmaceutical form or in powder for oral suspension had AMC equal to zero.
According to the researched literature, 15% (31) of dispensed drugs were classified as "non-crushable", therefore, they should not be administered via enteral feeding tubes (Table 1)
Twenty-eight drugs were found to have a potential interaction with enteral feeding (Table 2).
Variations in preparation techniques and drug administration via enteral feeding tubes were observed for 16 drugs (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
In this study, anti-infective drugs for systemic use was the most dispensed class and, within that class, antiretrovirals such as lamivudine, tenofovir and lopinavir + ritonavir. The type of institution where the research took place may have influenced this predominance, since the majority of patients was HIV-positive and under treatment with multiple drugs. Drugs used in the treatment of coinfections in HIV-positive patients also had a high level of consumption, such as isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol, for prophylaxis and treatment of tuberculosis. This reflects the patients' epidemiological profile, in which tuberculosis is an important and frequent coinfection04.
The considerable dispensation of drugs that act on the central nervous system is possibly justified by the direct action of HIV, opportunistic manifestations that affect the central nervous system, chronicity and severity of the disease, anatomical effects caused by treatment (such as lypodistrophia) and social and emotional limitations04.
Drugs that act on the cardiovascular system came in third in number of dispensed units, which is consistent with the institution's profile, since patients may develop metabolic disturbances due to antiretroviral drugs use(14), in addition to the use of these drugs in the treatment of Chagas disease carriers, who frequently seek care in the institution.
Concerning identified dosage forms, 86% of dispensed drugs were solid. Similar results were found in a large general hospital in the state of Minas Gerais, where 95% of available oral drugs at the hospital pharmacy were solid(3). Studies that analyzed patterns in drugs prescriptions for patients with enteral feeding tubes demonstrated a trend of prescribing solid drugs in the dosage form of simple tablets for administration via enteral feeding tubes°506). It is important to emphasize that a large part of simple tablets can be administered via enteral feeding tubes if they are prepared correctly because, when it comes to administering tablets by this via, not only the dosage form should be observed, but also the physical-chemical characteristics of the drugs' active principle.
The small quantity of drugs in liquid dosage form is a complicating factor for drug preparation and administration via tubes, since this is the dosage form indicated in literature as the most adequate in drug therapy for patients(12).
A higher availability of liquid dosage form at the institution could benefit not only patients under enteral nutrition therapy but also those who complain of dysphagia, odynophagia and patients with megaesophagus, which are common conditions in that hospital.
Findings related to solid drugs available in liquid dosage form at the institution or in the Brazilian pharmaceutical market and that, therefore, represented a better option for patients with enteral feeding tubes, in addition to the observation that there were 10 drugs in liquid or powder dosage forms for oral suspension that had AMC equal to zero which were dispensed in solid dosage form may demonstrate lack of knowledge from prescribers regarding availability of these drugs at the institution's pharmacy or communication problems among sectors. Participation of a multidisciplinary team for nutritional therapy is crucial for analyzing prescriptions, which would enable interventions from medical, nursing, pharmacy and nutrition teams.
The literature shows that problems when choosing the best dosage form for patients under enteral nutrition therapy are frequent. A study conducted in the intensive care unit of a university hospital in Puerto Rico(17) showed that, among 115 drugs administered via enteral feeding tubes, 43.5% were considered wrongly administered. The study included, among other errors, the administration of solid drugs also available in liquid dosage form. In Brazil, a study in intensive care units of seven university hospitals identified potential drug-nutrient interactions in 6.3% (20) to 7.7% (39) of patients under enteral feeding tube nutrition, at 24 hours and 120 hours of hospitalization, respectively. The drugs that were most frequently involved in interactions were hydralazine, phenytoin, Levothyroxine and warfarin. The last three have narrow therapy indexes, which shows the clinical relevance of their monitoring04.
Studies show that approximately 25% of educational interventions about the best therapeutic choice for patients under enteral nutrition, instruct the medical team about the availability of liquid dosage forms of prescribed drugs(4-17)"publisherplace":"Belo Horizonte","genre":"Monografia de especializaçâo em farmácia clínica e serviços de saúde","event-place":"Belo Horizonte","abstract":"As diversas desvantagens da administraçâo de medicamentos juntamente com NutriçâoXnEnteral (NE. Nurses take on the fundamental role of planning drugs scheduling and diet; thus, becoming crucial in the prevention of potential interactions. However, errors might occur at all stages, from prescription until drug administration to the patient, which demands actions based on a multidisciplinary perspective04.
In this study, 60% of drugs with higher AMC had specific documented recommendations regarding their administration via enteral feeding tubes. However, a bibliographical review showed that there are still gaps in national recommendations about drug preparation and administration via enteral feeding tubes, even on their prescription package inserts. Important information such as osmolality of liquid drugs was also observed. Most of the information available comes from research conducted in other countries.
Use of non-crushable drugs via enteral feeding tubes is also described in other studies04. Contraindications for crushing take into consideration dosage form (oral dispersion tablets, dragees, sustained release tablets and effervescent) and the specific characteristics of each drug (i.e., paroxetine hydrochloride and efavirenz, whose coating can obstruct the tube)(1). Some, despite not having specific information, such as "do not open" or "do not crush", are used via enteral feeding tubes based on evidence; such as the case of acetylsalicylic acid in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction(3).
Measures that prevent these types of errors include verification of availability of liquid dosage forms, administration route swap, temporary suspension of drugs and even their substitution004. Some authors suggest labeling the packaging of non-crushable drugs with figures expressing the prohibition of crushing and the message "DO NOT CRUSH" as preventive measures09-24.
Another relevant study result was the finding that approximately 12% (28) of dispensed oral drugs had a potential interaction with enteral nutrition. Drugs with a possible interaction with enteral nutrition were also detected in other studies conducted in Brazilian general hospitals, however, varying from 12.5% (6) to 47.7% (62) of assessed drugs(4)"publisherplace":"Belo Horizonte","genre":"Monografiade especializaçâo em farmácia clínica e serviços de saúde","event-place":"Belo Horizonte","abstract":"As diversas desvantagens da administraçao de medicamentos juntamente com NutriçâoXnEnteral (NE.
Drug-nutrient interactions can compromise therapeutic effects and impact patients' nutritional status; therefore, as soon as they are identified, feasible strategies must be considered to avoid them.
Necessary adjustments in preparation techniques and administration of 16 drugs included: increase in water volume for dilution and irrigation of the tube after drug administration, immediate administration and longer periods of pause of enteral nutrition, with the aim of, according to the active principle, maintain its stability, guarantee effectiveness and the correct dilution to avoid occlusion of tube and interaction with enteral nutrition. Solid drugs that have low water solubility or liquid drugs with high osmolality require higher water volume for uniform dilution; the stability of these drugs after preparation for administration via tubes is seldom discussed in literature.
Increase in the pause period is not always possible in clinical practice due to factors such as high number of prescribed drugs at different times and patients' nutritional status. At the institution under study, for example, patients under enteral nutrition therapy generally presented a compromised clinical and nutritional status, and enteral nutrition was administered via infusion pump for periods of 20 to 24 hours, since patients do not tolerate infusion rates above 85 mL/h. Therefore, participation of a multidisciplinary team for nutritional therapy is crucial for decision-making, seeking the best harmonization between nutritional and pharmacological therapies.
Study limitations
One could assume as a limitation of this study that the drugs data were obtained from information of the dispensation pharmacy service makes it impossible to know which proportion of these drugs were effectively administered via enteral feeding tubes.
It is also worth emphasizing that since it is a public institution, where drugs are purchased via government procurement, and these do not always result in purchases of the same brands of drugs, there might be possible variations on dosage forms and, consequently, on preparation and administration.
Contributions for the health field
The authors of this study hope it can contribute to the Brazilian scientific production concerning the safety of drug therapy, providing a data compilation that is critically assessed for use by health workers, especially for nursing workers, who are an active part of this process, in clinical practice, in the design of institutional protocols, as well as in fostering new research in the area.
CONCLUSION
In this study, conducted at a hospital unit for infectious diseases in Rio de Janeiro, anti-infectives for systemic use was the most dispensed drug class, followed by those that act on the nervous and cardiovascular systems. Taking into consideration dosage form, solid drugs were the most dispensed, although approximately 30% of them were available in liquid form, considered the most adequate for use via enteral feeding tubes.
Through critical analysis of these drugs, from the perspective of their administration via enteral feeding tubes and with scientific evidence available in literature, it was possible to observe that many dispensed drugs require a specific technique for preparation and administration, depending on the drugs' characteristics, such as their dosage forms, possibility or lack of possibility of crushing and possible incompatibilities when administered simultaneously with an enteral diet. The non-observance of these characteristics can harm pharmacological and nutritional therapy.
Thus, the importance of multi-professional groups such as multi-disciplinary teams for nutritional therapy is emphasized at all stages of the process of administering drugs via enteral feeding tubes. In this perspective, it is also worth emphasizing the need for a continuous training program with the goal of offering workers knowledge that enable a safe and rational practice, consistent with good practices for drugs preparation and administration.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
To the Graduate Program in Clinical Research for Infectious Diseases of the Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases / FIOCRUZ, which made this study possible as part of the Professional Master's Degree Dissertation of Michele F. B. da Silva.
How to cite this article:
Silva MFB, Brito PD, Guaraldo L. Oral drugs at a hospital unit: adequacy for use via enteral feeding tubes. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2016;69(5):795-801. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2015-0081
Submission: 10-28-2015 Approval: 04-20-2016
REFERENCES
1. White R, Bradnam V. Handbook of drug administration via enteral feeding tubes. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2007.
2. Reis NT. Nutriçâo clínica interaçoes: fármaco x fármaco, fármaco x nutriente, nutriente x nutriente, fitoterápico x fármaco. Rio de Janeiro: Rubio; 2004.
3. Zhu L-L, Zhou Q. Therapeutic concerns when oral medications are administered nasogastrically. J Clin Pharm Ther [Internet]. 2013[cited 2014 Oct 2];38(4):272-6. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jcpt.12041edit
4. Costa JM, Figueiredo IE, Nascimento MMG, Almeida KA, Viel CB, Silva EF. Estudo descritivo da metodología de avaliaçâo das atividades farmacéuticas em hospital público universitário de Belo Horizonte, MG. Infarma. Conselho Federal de Farmácia[Internet] Brasilia; 2010 [cited 2014 Nov 28];22(56):42-9. Avaliable from: http://www.cff.org.br/sistemas/geral/ revista/pdf/126/041a104_infarma.pdf
5.Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Resoluçâo n° 466 de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos [Internet]. 2012[cited 2015 Mar 31]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude. gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html
6. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sep 6]. Available from: http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/.
7. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Bulário eletrônico [Internet]. 2013[cited 2013 Apr 27]. Available from: http://www.anvi sa.gov.br/fila_bula/
8. Micromedex Healthcare Series [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.thomsonhc. com/home/dispatch
9. Rolandelli R. Clinical nutrition: enteral and tube feeding. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
10. Matsuba CST, Magnoni D. Enfermagem em Terapia Nutritional. Sao Paulo: Sarvier; 2009.
11. Carneiro MB, editor. Guia Farmacoterapêutico. Hospital Erasto Gaertner [Internet]. Curitiba: 2011 [cited 2015 Mar 31]. Available from: http://www.erastogaertner.com.br/arq uivos/farmacia/guia_farmaco_web.pdf
12. Bankhead R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J, et al. A.S.P.E.N. Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations. J Parenter Enter Nutr [Internet] 2009[cited 2014 Jul 31];33(2):122-67. Available from: http://pen. sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0148607108330314
13. Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NEP, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive care. Clin. Nutr [Internet] 2006[cited 2014 Jul 31];25(2):210-23. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0261561406000410
14. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilancia em Saúde. Departamento de DST, Aids e Hepatites Virais. Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapéuticas para manejo da infecçao pelo HIV em adultos. 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 8]. 220p. Available from: http://www.aids.gov.br/sites/default/files/ane xos/publicacao/2013/55308/protocolo_13_3_2014_ pdf_28003.pdf
15. Rollins C, Thomson C, Crane T. Pharmacotherapeutic Issues. In: Clinical Nutrition Enteral and Tube Fedding. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 291-305.
16. Mota MLS, Barbosa IV, Studart RMB, Melo EM, Lima FET, Mariano FA. Avaliaçao do conhecimento do enfermeiro de unidade de terapia intensiva sobre administraçao de medicamentos por sonda nasogástrica e nasoenteral. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet] 2010[cited 2014 Jul 31];18(5):888-94. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/ pdf/rlae/v18n5/pt_08.pdf
17. Catalán E, Padilla F, Hérvas F, Pérez MA, Ruiz F. Fármacos orales que no deben ser triturados. Enferm Intensiva [Internet] 2001[cited 2014 Jul 31];12(3):146-50. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1130239901780327
18. Reis AMM, Carvalho REFL, Faria LMP, Oliveira RC, Zago KSA, Cavelagna MF, et al. Prevalência e significancia clínica de interaçoes fármaco-nutr^áo enteral em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2014[cited 2015 Mar 18];67(1). Available from: http://www.scielo.br/ pdf/reben/v67n1/0034-7167-reben-67-01-0085.pdf
19. Lisboa CD, Silva LD, Matos GC. Investigaçao da técnica de preparo de medicamentos para administraçao por cateteres pela enfermagem na terapia intensiva. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 2013[cited 2015 Mar 31];47(1):53-60. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/ pdf/reeusp/v47n1/a07v47n1.pdf
20. Malagoli BG, Viel CB, Silva EF, Emery IC, Costa JM, Almeida CCA, et al. Manual farmacoterapêutico para melhoria das práticas em farmácia hospitalar [Internet]. Belo Horizonte: Hospital Risoleta Tolentino Neves. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2009[cited 2013 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.hrtn.fundep.ufmg.br/arquivos/Far maciaHospitalarLivrodigital.pdf
Michele Fernanda Borges da SilvaI, Patrícia Dias de BritoI, Lusiele GuaraldoI
1 Fundaçào Oswaldo Cruz, Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Michele Fernanda Borges da Silva E-mail: [email protected]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem Sep/Oct 2016