International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
Vol.10, No.4, pp.539553, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40069-016-0165-4
ISSN 1976-0485 / eISSN 2234-1315
http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s40069-016-0165-4&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s40069-016-0165-4&domain=pdf
Web End = Improving Impact Resistance of Polymer Concrete Using CNTs
Sherif M. Daghash1), Eslam M. Soliman2),*, Usama F. Kandil3), and Mahmoud M. Reda Taha4)
(Received March 15, 2016, Accepted July 10, 2016, Published online August 5, 2016)
Abstract: Polymer concrete (PC) has been favoured over Portland cement concrete when low permeability, high adhesion, and/or high durability against aggressive environments are required. In this research, a new class of PC incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs) is introduced. Four PC mixes with different MWCNTs contents were examined. MWCNTs were carefully dispersed in epoxy resin and then mixed with the hardener and aggregate to produce PC. The impact strength of the new PC was investigated by performing low-velocity impact tests. Other mechanical properties of the new PC including compressive, exural, and shear strengths were also characterized. Moreover, microstructural characterization using scanning electron microscope and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of PC incorporating MWCNTs was performed. Impact test results showed that energy absorption of PC with 1.0 wt% MWCNTs by weight of epoxy resin was signicantly improved by 36 % compared with conventional PC. Microstructural analysis demonstrated evidence that MWCNTs signicantly altered the chemical structure of epoxy matrix. The changes in the microstructure lead to improvements in the impact resistance of PC, which would benet the design of various PC structural elements.
Keywords: polymer concrete, carbon nanotubes, impact strength, microstructure, cracking.
1. Introduction
Concrete polymer composites were introduced to the construction industry in three types: polymer modied concrete (PMC), polymer concrete (PC) and polymer impregnated concrete (PIC). The use of PMC, PC and PIC has remarkably increased in the last 20 years. This paper is focused on PC where a thermoset polymer (e.g. epoxy, polyester) replaces cement as the adhesive matrix for concrete based on ACI Committee 548 (2009). PC has gained wide acceptance because of its relatively high strength, high bond to concrete and steel substrates, rapid setting and ease of placement. The early use of PC in the construction eld was limited to repair and rapid repair applications (Wang et al. 2003). However, PC is currently used in applications with aggressive service environments such as bridge deck overlays, industrial oors,
utility rooms and manholes and for architectural precast panels (ACI Committee 548 2009; Radliska et al. 2014). Because of its high damping characteristics, PC was also favored in applications with high dynamics such as machine foundations (Orak 2000). Many investigations were performed in the last two decades to modify mechanical characteristics of PC. Such investigations included replacing aggregate ller in PC by y ash (Rebeiz and Craft 2002; Rebeiz et al. 2004), or by recycled plastic wastes (Bignozzi et al. 2000; Tawk and Eskander 2006; Jo et al. 2007).
The impact resistance of concrete was typically improved using additives, specically bers, to the polymer matrix or by replacing aggregate with energy absorbent ones. Li and Xu (2009) improved the energy absorption capacity and deformation at failure of PC by adding basalt bers. The dynamic modulus of elasticity and energy absorption were also improved using marble particles (Martnez-Barrera and Brostow 2010). Moreover, dispersed chopped glass and carbon bers were used to produce ber reinforced polymer concrete with enhanced strength, stiffness and energy absorption (Wang et al. 2013; Sett and Vipulanandan 2004). For instance, chopped carbon bers were proved to improve the energy absorption of isophthalic polyester mortar by up to 360 % (Sett and Vipulanandan 2004). Other researchers showed that carbon bers with as low as 0.2 % volume fraction were able to improve the strength and energy absorption of concrete (Xu et al. 2010).
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are one of the nano-scale inorganic particles utilized as additives in composites. CNTs are tabular materials made from concentrically rolled single or multiple graphite sheets. They are produced using the
1)Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
2)Department of Civil Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt.*Corresponding Author;
E-mail: [email protected]
3)Polymer Nanocomposite Center of Excellence, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Cairo 11727, Egypt.
4)Department of Civil Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Copyright The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
539
carbon arc-discharge method normally consisting of hollow carbon hexagonal networks concentrically arranged around each other and containing multiple inner chambers (Zhou and Chow 2003). CNTs were rst introduced as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and proved to have superior mechanical properties, but SWCNTs showed to be signicantly expensive. High-purity SWCNTs are synthesized and grown using thermal chemical vapor deposition (CVD) at a growth temperature above 700 C (Sharma and
Iqbal 2004; Ting et al. 2008). Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) appeared later as a cheaper alternative form of CNTs. In CVD method MWCNTs are synthesized at a relatively low temperature of 450 C compared to 700 C for
SWCNTs (Sharma and Iqbal 2004). Although CNTs production is a challenging process, low-cost large-scale production of MWCNTs has been reported by Huang et al. with a yield as high as 10 kg/h using uidized bed catalytic CVD technique (Huang et al. 2012).
MWCNTs have multiple energy and structural applications. It can be used for hydrogen storage and gas absorption (Tan et al. 2012). Moreover, MWCNTs were used to modify glass ber reinforced polymer (GFRP) laminates to create electrically conductive networks in the matrix for structural health monitoring applications (Viets et al. 2009). MWCNTs have also been proved able to signicantly improve the matrix dominated properties of GFRP (e.g. interlaminar shear strength) (Gojny et al. 2005) and to enhance the off-axis shear strength of carbon ber reinforced polymer (CFRP) (Soliman et al. 2012a). In addition, CNTs are used to alter the impact resistance of polymer nanocomposites (Laurenzi et al. 2013) and woven fabric composite materials (Soliman et al. 2012b). It was shown that latex modied concrete with enhanced properties can be produced by incorporating CNTs in the polymer matrix during PC fabrication (Reda Taha et al. 2013). In order to enhance the bond between CNTs and polymer systems, CNTs were functionalized by chemical groups, which react with the polymer resin and hardener. Although the dispersion of CNTs in polymer matrices is a challenging process, several methods have been reported as suitable techniques for large-scale dispersion of CNTs in polymer matrices including melt blending, extrusion, latex polymer technology (Choudhary and Gupta 2011; Ma and Kim 2011). In this case, the use of nanoscale imaging techniques, such as scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope, and X-ray photography, can be used to verify the dispersion of CNTs in the polymer matrices (Nam and Lee 2015).
Previous research has shown the potential use of CNTs as sensors for structural health monitoring applications. In particular, since CNTs are electrically conductive material, the addition of small amount, known as the percolation threshold, may alter the electrical conductivity of non-conductive polymer-based construction materials (Zamal 2011). For instance, Swain et al. (2012) reported improvement in the electrical properties of unsaturated polyester resin by incorporating allylester functionalized MWCNTs and silane functionalized MWCNTs. Furthermore, wax coated MWCNTs enhanced the electrical conductivity and
improved the mechanical properties of high-density polyethylene system (Jiang and Drzal 2011). Moreover, the fatigue damage of glass ber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites was monitored using CNTs (Reda Taha et al. 2014).
This research investigates the ability of COOH functionalized MWCNTs to alter epoxy-based PC microstructure and improve PC impact resistance. The epoxy resin contains reactive epoxy groups (COC) at the two ends of the polymer chain. Similarly, the hardener typically contains amino groups (NH2). It is suggested that carboxyl (COOH)
groups functionalized MWCNTs will react with epoxy to produce epoxy-MWCNTs nanocomposite that will improve the mechanical characteristics and specically the impact resistance of PC.
2. Experimental Procedures
2.1 Materials
In this research, PC was produced using low modulus polysulde siloxane epoxy typically used to manufacture PC.The epoxy consists of two components; Bisphenol-based epoxy resin, and Phenol based epoxy hardener. The resin was mixed with a ne aggregate mix of crystalline silica (quartz) and bauxite-based aggregate with nominal maximum size of4.75-mm and a neness modulus of 3.2. Grading of the aggregate used in producing PC is shown in Fig. 1. A similar mix is usually used in the industry to produce PC overlays.The epoxy was used as supplied to produce neat PC or was mixed with MWCNTs supplied by Cheap Tubes, Inc. The MWCNTs were produced using the catalyzed chemical vapor deposition (CCVD) method at a relatively low temperature of 450 C with purity above 95 wt%. In the CCVD process metallic nanoparticles such as nickel, iron, cobalt, or copper, are used to catalytically decompose gaseous carbon-containing molecules (Magrez et al. 2010). MWCNTs, used here, were functionalized by COOH group. The functionalization was performed using a mixture of non-organic acids producing COOH functional groups of 1.23 wt% of the MWCNTs weight. Table 1 presents the main characteristics of MWCNTs used in this research. The MWCNTs used has (2030 nm) outer diameter and 10-30 lm length. Four PC mixes were developed and examined: neat PC without MWCNTs; and three other PC mixes incorporating 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 % MWCNTs by weight of the resin. The choice of these ratios is based on prior work on using MWCNTs with ber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites (Soliman et al. 2012b). Table 2 presents the mix proportions for the PC mix.It is important to note that 1.00 wt% MWCNTs by weight of the resin represents 0.60 % of polymer volume, based on a true density of MWCNTs of 2.1 g/cm3, and thus 0.01 % of concrete volume.
For the neat PC mix, the required amounts of resin and hardener were mixed together for 23 min using a low speed mixer, after which silica lling powder followed by the required coarse aggregate was added. Mixing continued for 23 min until the mixture was uniform. For the three other
540 | International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016)
Fig. 1 Grading of aggregate used in producing PC with nominal maximum size of 4.75-mm and a neness modulus of 3.15.
Table 1 Properties of MWCNTs (Cheaptubes, Inc.).
Outer diameter (nm) 2030 Inner diameter (nm) 510 MWCNTs ash (wt%) \1.5
Purity (%) [95 Length (lm) 1030 Specic surface area (m2/g) 110
Bulk density (g/cm3) 0.28 Electrical conductivity (S/cm) [100
COOH content (wt%) 1.2 %
Table 2 Mix proportions by weight of neat PC, kg/m3.
Resin Hardener Filler powder Coarse aggregate 288 128 1570 320
mixes, MWCNTs were added to the required amount of the resin, and the mix was stirred for 2 h at 110 C using magnetic stirring. This relatively high mixing temperature was used to reduce the resin viscosity and improve the dispersion of MWCNTs. The mix was then sonicated for 2 additional hours at 65 C. During the sonication, sound waves are generated from the transducer and radiate through the liquid causing high and low pressures releasing high amount of energy and improving the dispersion of MWCNTs. The epoxy-MWCNTs nanocomposite was left to reach room temperature and then mixed with the hardener for 23 min. The required aggregates were added and mixing continued for 3 additional minutes until the PC mixture was uniform. All PC specimens were cured in air at 22 C and 50 % relative humidity for 7 days as recommended by ACI Committee 548 (2009).
2.2 Testing Methods
Low-velocity impact testing was performed on the four PC mixes with varying MWCNTs content. Low-velocity impact
is an essential test to determine the dynamic characteristics of PC reinforced with MWCNTs. The test is relevant to the design of civil infrastructure where concrete structural elements, such as concrete slabs, are often subjected to drop of heavy weights (e.g. steel elements) during the construction operations of multi-story buildings (Algaard et al. 2005; Izatt et al. 2009). In addition, polymer concrete pipes may drop resulting in impact loading during the transportation and installation of pipelines. In other situations, the reinforced concrete girders or barriers may also be subjected to low velocity vehicles collision (Batarlar 2013). Additionally, the owability test was performed to judge the effect of adding MWCNTs on the owability of the fresh polymer concrete. Furthermore, static compressive, exural, and shear strength tests were performed, as shown in Fig. 2, to understand the effect of MWCNTs on basic mechanical properties of PC. Compressive, exure, and shear failures were selected for evaluation as they represent the different failure modes structural PC may encounter when subjected to impact loading. Therefore, evaluating the effect of adding
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016) | 541
Cross-head
Combined
Weights
Striker
Specimen ring
support
Test chamber
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 2 Mechanical testing of PC incorporating MWCNTs a impact testing equipment, b compressive strength test, c exural
strength test, d shear strength test.
MWCNTs on the three mechanical properties would help understanding the change in the response of low-velocity impact tests. Specimens for each test, except for the owability test as it was performed once for each mix, were produced in replicas of three for each mix. Based on the limited coefcient of variation (COV) of the test results, three replicas were found sufcient to precisely compare the mechanical properties for the different PC mixes.
2.2.1 Flowability TestThe test was performed according to ASTM C1437 where a ow table, a ow cone, and a test caliper were used (ASTM C1437 2009). The cones smaller diameter was 70-mm, larger diameter was 100-mm, and the height was 50-mm. For testing, each mix was prepared and the cone was lled by fresh mix in two layers, and each layer was tamped 20 times. The cone was lifted in 4 s and 25 strikes were applied to the fresh specimen in 15 s. After the 25 strikes, four perpendicular readings were taken by the test caliper. The owability percentage was considered as the sum of the previous four readings.
2.2.2 Impact TestThe impact test was performed using CEAST 9350 drop tower low velocity impact tester by Instron. The test was
performed by dropping a 12.7-mm diameter hemispherical striker carrying a total weight of 14.93 kg on the specimens and recording specimen response. The total weight includes a carriage weight of 4.3 kg, a striker weight of 0.63 kg, and 10 kg additional weights. The testing system is equipped to measure the time history for the striker force and incident velocity. This is achieved using a load cell attached to the striker and a laser system mounted at the specimen elevation to measure the incident velocity. In addition, the testing system is designed and instrumented according to ASTM D7136 (2007) and ISO 6603-2 (2000) standards such that the effect of inertia force is minimized. In this regard, three cautions are considered during the test. First, dynamic calibration of the strikers load cell is performed within an accuracy of 1.0 %. In addition, the strikers load cell was placed as close as possible at a distance of 12-mm from the contact surfaces (e.g. strikers tip). Furthermore, 97 % of the impactor mass is located above the load cell. The prisms for this test were 100-mm square prisms with 20-mm thickness. During the test, the specimens were clamped by two rings attached to the test machine of outer diameter of 100-mm. 40 J of energy were applied on each specimen. The choice of the energy to test the specimens was done after a few trials to ensure that the energy used was enough to penetrate the neat PC specimens. Using a data acquisition system and sampling rate of 800 kHz, the
542 | International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016)
microscope (SEM), microscopic images, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) tests. In both the SEM and FTIR, no ller powder or aggregate was used in the microstructural characterization tests while in the microscopic images all polymer concrete components are examined.
The main goal of SEM investigation is to give an insight on dispersion of CNTs in polymer matrix and the mechanical mechanism of CNTs in polymer concrete composites. The microstructural features of a fractured surface of epoxy reinforced with 1.0 wt% MWCNTs were investigated under SEM with a guaranteed resolution of 0.51.7 nm at 301 kV, respectively. In addition, 1009 magnication microscopic images are presented for the PC with neat epoxy and epoxy incorporating 1.0 % MWCNTs to assess the quality of mixing polymer concrete components (e.g. epoxy, aggregates, and powder).
In FTIR, samples of neat epoxy and epoxy incorporating MWCNTs were analyzed with biconical reectance Micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Micro-FTIR) apparatus. The FTIR has a continuum microscope with a Globar source, XT-KBr beam splitter and a MCT-A detector over a 100 9 100 lm area with a 4-cm-1 resolution.
Spectra were background corrected using a reective gold slide and converted to absorbance using the KramersKronig equation as per standard FTIR analysis method (Roessler 1965).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Impact and Mechanical Properties of PC
Figure 3 shows the effect of MWCNTs on owability of PC. Flowability of the fresh polymer concrete was decreased by 18, 22, and 26 % with addition of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt% of MWCNTs, respectively. Figure 4 shows the impact force time history of the PC mixes. The peak force increased by 9 % with adding 1.0 wt% MWCNTs, while decreased by 4 and 3 % with adding 0.5 and 1.5 wt% MWCNTs, respectively. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a 95 % level of condence showed the change in the peak force to be statistically insignicant. The addition of MWCNTs did not therefore make a signicant change in the peak force. The insignicant improvement of the impact peak force might be attributed to the insignicant effect of MWCNTs on shear strength of PC as described below. On the other hand, the graphs in Fig. 4 also show that adding MWCNTs increased the residual resistance of PC after the impact event signicantly. The residual resistance factor RRF was dened here as the ratio of the residual force to the peak force observed by the specimen. The residual force was selected at 3 ms to evaluate the residual capacity of the PC specimens after reaching the peak force. The RRF examines the ability of the PC specimens to remain intact and to continue carrying the load after hitting the striker. An increase in the RRF demonstrates a more ductile failure for PC specimens. An inset in Fig. 4 shows the signicant improvement in the residual resistance factor of PC
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016) | 543
time history of impact force F(t), absorbed energy E(t) and test velocity v(t) were recorded using the following equations according to ASTM D7136 (2007).
vt vi gt Z
t
Ft
m dt 1
0
dt di vit
gt2
2 Z
t
0
@
Zt
0
Ft
m dt
1
Adt 2
0
Et
mv2i vt2
2 mgdt 3
where t is time, vi is the initial velocity, g is gravity, m is the applied mass, d(t) is the displacement, and di is the initial position.
2.2.3 Compressive Strength TestThe compressive strength test was performed in a standard compression machine on three 50.8-mm cubes made from each mix. The cubes were tested at 7 days of age with loading rate of 6 kN/min according to ASTM C579 (2012).
2.2.4 Flexural Strength TestIn order to perform the exure test, polymer concrete prisms were fabricated from each mix. The prisms dimensions were 25.4-mm 9 25.4-mm 9 116-mm. The prisms were tested in a three-point bending test setup at 7 days of age with a loading rate of 0.3 kN/min according to ASTM C78 (2002). The distance between the supports was 96-mm. The mid span deection was recorded using a linear variable differential transducer (LVDT). The exure load and displacement were performed using a servo hydraulic system and recorded using a data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 10 Hz for all experiments.
2.2.5 Shear Strength TestThe shear test was performed following the guidelines of ASTM D4475 in what is known as a short beam setup (ASTM D4475 2008). To enforce shear failure in that test, the distance between supports was limited to 32-mm and the distance between points of loading was set at 24-mm such that the distance between each support and the adjacent point of loading shear span was limited to 4-mm as shown in Fig. 2d. The prisms were tested in a four-point bending at 7 days of age. The shear test was performed using servo hydraulic system and recorded data acquisition system with sampling rate of 10 Hz for all experiments.
2.3 Microstructural Characterization
The microstructural characterization tests of epoxy-MWCNTs nanocomposite were performed on specimens of neat epoxy and epoxy with 1.0 wt% MWCNTs to explain the improvement observed in the macroscale mechanical response of PC incorporating MWCNTs. The microstructural characterization tests included scanning electron
Fig. 3 Effect of MWCNTs on PC owability. The % presented above the bars represents the reduction of owability compared with
neat PC at 0 %.
Fig. 4 Effect of MWCNTs on PC resistance to impact loads. Main gure shows forcetime response of PCs with different
MWCNTs contents and inset gure shows the signicant increase in the residual resistance factor of PC with MWCNTs
specimens reecting the ability MWCNTs to dissipate energy in PC.
544 | International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016)
after impact of 44, 39 and 38 % for 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 wt% MWCNTs, respectively compared with 20 % for neat PC. It is obvious that MWCNTs better dissipated damage in PC due to the impact load which enabled PC with MWCNTs to have a higher residual resistance after impact compared with neat PC.
It can also be observed in Fig. 5 that the MWCNTs increased the difference between the initial velocity and the nal velocity. The signicant reduction of penetration velocity (i.e. slowdown of the impact striker inside the PC matrix) incorporating 0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs is evident in Fig. 5. The increase in the slowdown of the impact striker reects the ability of PC incorporating MWCNTs to better dissipate the impact energy applied to the specimen compared with neat PC. That was further conrmed by observing the cracking pattern of impact specimens of PC
incorporating MWCNTs as discussed later. The absorbed impact energy increased by 29, 36, and 19 % in the case of0.5, 1.0, 1.5 wt% MWCNTs, respectively, as shown in Table 3. Statistical analysis using Students t-test proved that the impact energy for PC mixes 0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs is signicantly higher than that of neat PC. No signicant difference was observed for PC with 1.5 wt% MWCNTs. The impact tests proved that adding well dispersed and functionalized MWCNTs improved impact resistance of PC. It is evident that MWCNTs provided an energy dissipation mechanism that enables higher energy absorption than that of the conventional PC. The limited improvement in PC incorporating 1.5 wt% MWCNTs is attributed to the decrease in epoxy owability and the difculty to disperse this relatively high amount of MWCNTs in the epoxy resin as further discussed below.
Fig. 5 Effect of MWCNTs on impact striker velocity. Inset shows the slowdown of the impact striker in PC incorporating MWCNTs.
Table 3 Effect of MWCNTs content on maximum absorbed impact energy in J.
Neat 0.5 % 1.0 % 1.5 %
SP1 22.13 36.04 36.43 28.30
SP2 26.42 35.38 36.09 30.80 SP3 31.80 31.86 36.58 36.70 Mean SD 26.8 4.8 34.4 2.2 36.4 0.3 31.9 4.3
To examine effect of adding MWCNTs on the fracture behaviour of PCs, the ductility was evaluated by calculating the ductility index (DI) after (Beaumont et al. 1975; Park et al. 2000; Pegoretti et al. 2008) for different mixes as per Eq. (4)
DI%
Ep
Ei 100 4
where Ei is the initiation energy and Ep is the propagation energy. In this study, the initiation and propagation energies are considered as the energies absorbed before and after reaching the peak force, respectively. The summation of the initiation Ei and propagation Ep energies yields the maximum (total) absorbed energy ET reported in Table 3. Different absorbed energies along with ductility indices are listed in Table 4. For the cases of neat, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 wt% MWCNTs, the ductility indices (DIs) were 2.79, 4.65, 3.63, and 4.74, respectively. Comparison of the ductility indices of the different PC mixes shows that with the addition of MWCNTs, PC with MWCNTs becomes more ductile (i.e.
capable of dissipating energy prior to failure) than neat PC. While the initiation energies do not differ signicantly between PCs with different MWCNTs contents, the propagation energies differ signicantly. The DI combines the change in both the initiation and propagation energies. The signicant increase in propagation energy/ductility of PCs with MWCNTs conrms the role of MWCNTs in dissipating energy during impact loading.
The compressive strength test was performed on cubes made of the four PC mixes. As shown in Table 5, adding0.5 wt% MWCNTs increased the compressive strength of PC by 10 %, while adding 1.0 and 1.5 wt% MWCNTs decreased the strength by 1.5 and 3.0 %, respectively. Statistical analysis using Students t-test was performed on test results and proved that the difference between the compressive strength of the PC mixes with and without MWCNTs was statistically signicant only for 0.5 wt% MWCNTs. Although statistically signicant, the limited increase in compressive strength of PC due to the addition of0.5 wt% MWCNTs suggests that MWCNTs do not have an
Table 4 Ductility index (DI) of PC with varying contents of MWCNTs in %.
Neat 0.5 % 1.0 % 1.5 %
Initiation energy (Ei) (J) 5.84 6.27 7.90 5.37
Propagation energy (Ep) (J) 16.29 29.11 28.67 25.43 Ductility Index (DI) (%) 2.79 4.65 3.63 4.74
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016) | 545
Table 5 Compressive strength of PC with varying contents of MWCNTs in MPa.Neat 0.5 % 1.0 % 1.5 %
SP1 30.37 31.94 28.90 27.92
SP2 27.40 31.36 28.60 29.31 SP3 31.97 27.88 27.10 Mean SD 28.9 2.1 31.8 0.3 28.5 0.5 28.1 1.1
impact on the compressive strength of PC. All PC compression specimens failed due to excessive deformations and no sudden fracture was observed.
Stressstrain curves of the exural tests of neat PC and PC incorporating MWCNTs were plotted and presented in Fig. 6. The Youngs modulus of elasticity represented by the initial slope of the curve was computed for each mix and the variation of this modulus is shown as an inset in Fig. 6. It is shown that the modulus of elasticity of PC was increased by 15 % with adding 0.5 wt% MWCNTs, and decreased by 40 % with 1.5 wt% MWCNTs. No signicant change was observed with adding 1.0 wt% MWCNTs. Statistical analysis using Students t-test proved that there is no signicant difference in the case of 0.5, and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs, but a signicant reduction with PC incorporating 1.5 wt% MWCNTs. The insignicant statistical difference for the 0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs cases could be attributed to the relatively high standard deviation of 1.46 and 1.38 GPa respectively. The effect of adding MWCNTs on the strength and strain capacities of PC is shown in Tables 6 and 7, respectively. Incorporating 0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs in the PC mix increased the exural strength by 41, and 26 %, respectively, while the 1.5 wt% MWCNTs decreased the exural strength by 2 %. Signicant statistical difference between exural strengths in the case of 0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs was proven by statistical analysis, while no
statistical difference was found for 1.5 wt% MWCNTs. Moreover, failure strain was increased by 3, 12, and 65 % with addition of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 wt% MWCNTs, respectively. For failure strains, no statistically signicant difference was found in the case of 0.5 wt% MWCNTs, while a signicant difference was proven with 1.0 and 1.5 wt% MWCNTs. The signicant increase in the failure strain associated with increasing the amount of MWCNTs could be attributed to the reduction on owability, which develops more entrapped air as discussed later.
Moreover, the exural toughness, dened as the static absorbed energy per unit volume, for different mixes is reported in Table 8. The table presents signicant increases in static absorbed energy with the addition of MWCNTs. For instance, 41, 36, and 54 % increase in exural absorbed energy is reported for 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt% MWCNTs, respectively. Similar to the DI, the exural toughness combines the change on both exure strength and strain capacity due to the addition of MWCNTs. It is also important to mention that there is no explicit relationship between the static absorbed energy (Table 8) and impact absorbed energy (Table 3). This is because the impact energy depends signicantly on many parameters such as strain rate, shape of projectile, material and stiffness of the projectile and the specimen, incident energy, and support boundary conditions. However, static absorbed energy might be correlated to
Fig. 6 Stressstrain curves of exure test of PC with varying MWCNTs content. Inset shows the change in modulus of elasticity of
PC with varying MWCNTs content.
546 | International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016)
Table 6 Flexural strength of PC with varying MWCNTs content in MPa.Neat 0.5 % 1.0 % 1.5 %
SP1 9.03 12.69 12.41 8.60
SP2 9.82 12.60 10.91 8.90 SP3 8.77 13.71 11.36 9.60 Mean SD 9.2 0.5 13.0 0.6 11.6 0.8 9.0 0.5
Table 7 Flexural failure strain of PC with varying MWCNTs content in (%).Neat 0.5 % 1.0 % 1.5 %
SP1 13.32 12.69 15.40 23.70
SP2 13.69 12.60 13.36 20.27 SP3 12.26 13.71 15.19 20.96 Mean SD 13.1 0.7 13.0 0.6 14.7 1.1 21.6 1.8
Table 8 Flexural toughness of PC with varying MWCNTs content in N mm/mm3.
Neat 0.5 % 1.0 % 1.5 %
SP1 0.8 1.11 1.24 1.38
SP2 0.9 1.03 0.95 1.11 SP3 0.72 1.28 1.10 1.24 Mean SD 0.81 0.09 1.14 0.13 1.10 0.15 1.24 0.14
impact energy and thus it can provide a useful indication of the performance of PCs with various MWCNTs contents to impact loading. Finally, the shear strength of PC incorporating MWCNTs is presented in Table 9. The shear strength of PC was decreased by 5, 13, and 9 % for addition of 0.5,1.0, and 1.5 wt% MWCNTs, respectively. The static shear test showed MWCNTs incapable of improving the shear strength of PC; statistical analysis using Students t-test with a 90 % level of condence conrmed that the change in the shear strength of PC incorporating varying MWCNTs content to be statistically insignicant. The 90 % condence level is selected for analyzing the shear test results because of the brittle nature of the shear failure which typically results in relatively high variation on the test results as opposed to other mechanical testing (e.g. exure or compression) where ductile failure associated with excessive deformation is observed.
Observing the behavior of PC with MWCNTs under compression and exure stresses, it is obvious that addition of MWCNTs altered its mechanical performance. The results
showed that MWCNTs did not have a signicant effect on the compressive strength of PC. However, MWCNTs signicantly improved the exural strength, stiffness and failure strain of PC. The signicance of MWCNTs on exural strength might be attributed to the ability of the MWCNTs to produce a new epoxy-MWCNTs nanocomposite with improved mechanical properties; specially the exural strength and the failure strain. These observations are supported by other researchers (Ganguli et al. 2005) who showed functionalized MWCNTs to act as microbers, each individual ber being 10-nm diameter and 1030 lm long.
These microbers were able to bridge micro and submicron cracks in the polymer matrix and improve mechanical properties. Moreover, the functionalization of MWCNTs allows the MWCNTs to chemically bond to the epoxy matrix and thus alter the strength, failure strains and stiffness of the PC incorporating MWCNTs as reported elsewhere (Zhu et al. 2003; Zhu et al. 2004).
It can also be observed that by increasing the MWCNTs content, there is an increase followed by a decrease in the
Table 9 Shear strength of PC with varying MWCNTs content in MPa.
Neat 0.5 % 1.0 % 1.5 %
SP1 4.70 4.71 4.22 4.48
SP2 5.14 4.71 4.29 4.64 SP3 5.01 4.68 4.42 4.44 Mean SD 5.0 0.2 4.7 0.0 4.3 0.1 4.5 0.1
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016) | 547
mechanical properties. This trend can be clearly observed in Tables 3 and 6, and the inset of Fig. 6 for the impact energy, exure strength, and Youngs modulus, respectively. This trend is a result of two counteracting factors. First, with relatively small amounts of MWCNTs (e.g. 0.5 wt% and below), there is insufcient amount of CNTs that can introduce signicant effect on the mechanical properties of polymer concretes. As the amount of CNTs increases, the improvements increase. On the other hand, the inefciency of 1.5 wt% MWCNTs content can be attributed to the reduction of PC owability at high content of MWCNTs. While the effect of MWCNTs on PC owability was limited in the case of 0.5 and 1.0 wt% the addition of 1.5 wt% MWCNTs reduced the owability signicantly. This reduction in PC owability might result in entrapping air that reduces the mechanical properties of PC with 1.5 wt% MWCNTs.
To prove the effect of air on the behavior of PC, air content was measured for the four PCs with different MWCNTs contents using the gravimetric method. The air contents for the PCs with neat, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt% MWCNTs were 12.9, 7.6, 7.3, and 10.2 % respectively as shown in Fig. 7. Two main observations can be deduced from the air content measurements. First, there is a general reduction in air content due to the addition of MWCNTs, which may also contribute to the improvement in various mechanical properties. This can be attributed to the improved cohesion of the matrix and MWCNTs given the possible reaction between MWCNTs and epoxy matrix. Second, there is considerable increase in the air content when the MWCNTs content reached 1.5 wt% compared with the 0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs. As explained earlier, this increase in air content is attributed to the decrease in owability of the epoxy resin with 1.5 wt% MWCNTs and causes a relative decrease in the mechanical properties of PC. Furthermore, the air content analysis shows that the addition of 0.51.0 wt% MWCNTs yields the lowest air contents of PC among all the examined MWCNTs contents. As a result, the mechanical testing showed that the cases of0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs outperformed the neat and1.5 wt% MWCNTs cases. Further investigations are warranted to determine the optimal content of MWCNTs for
each mechanical property, which may possibly fall between0.5 and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs.
3.2 Cracking Pattern of PC Under Impact
To further understand the signicance of MWCNTs we examined the cracking pattern of PC with and without MWCNTs under impact load. Crack pattern analysis was performed to assess the fracture behaviour of different PCs in lieu of cone damage/cracking analysis typically performed in composite materials subjected to impact loading. Figure 8 shows that in all impact specimens of PC incorporating MWCNTs, four or more concrete crack lines were formed compared with three crack lines formed in neat PC. Therefore, there is an obvious increase in the number of crack lines with the addition of MWCNTs. It is widely accepted that the increase in cracking density provides an indication of ductility and better material ability to dissipate energy as in the case of PC incorporating MWCNTs. In this case, the addition of MWCNTs acts like rebar in concrete, which results in distributing the strains and developing smaller and more closely spaced cracks. In order to understand the formation of radial cracks, analysis of the cracking pattern is established in accordance with yield line theory. In this analysis, the radial cracks were assumed to act as yield lines. In a typical orthotropic reinforced concrete plate with a circular boundary condition and subjected to a static central point load, a large number of radial cracks is expected to form (Fig. 9a) (Johansen 1962). However, in heterogeneous materials without reinforcement such as PC subjected to impact load, the cracking pattern would differ resulting on fewer crack lines as observed. Here, one needs to realize that the high strain rate of the impact load (10-310-2 s-1) is three to four orders of magnitude faster than static loading (10-610-5 s-1) (Riisgaard et al. 2007) which leads to forming instantaneous support points rather than the continuous circular support that would respond to static loading. The internal energy (I.E.) along the crack lines can still be computed following yield line theory as:
I:E: n:M:a:h 5 where n is number of fragments or number of crack lines, M is the moment carrying capacity per unit length, a is the
Fig. 7 Signicance of MWCNTs content on air content in PC
mixtures.
Fig. 8 Cracking pattern due to impact of PC with varying
MWCNTs content.
548 | International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016)
(a) (c)
L = 101 mm
Projec on of yield line, a Support line
Yield lines
Span of rota on, r
(d)
(b)
L =101 mm
0:88 n1:0% nneat
Fig. 9 Yield line analysis for cracking pattern a crack lines for
homogenous circular plate subjected to static loading,
b crack lines for neat PC, c crack lines for PC
incorporating 1.0 % MWCNTs, and d analysis for
internal energy consumed in one fragment.
6
a1 and a2 are the projected lengths of the cracks as shown in Figs. 9b and 9c, respectively. Since the ratio of absorbed energy between neat PC and PC incorporating 1.0 wt% MWCNTs is 1.36 as observed in the impact test (Table 3), the ratio of number of crack lines n1.0%/nneat would be 1.55.
This simple analysis proves that given the geometry of the impact test, the moment capacity and displacement observations of PC with and without MWCNTs, energy equilibrium necessitates increasing the number of crack lines from three to four or ve in order to achieve the reported increase in the absorbed energy. This is evident from experimental observation of the cracking pattern of PC with MWCNTs.
projection of the yield line on the axis of rotation, and h Dr
is the angle of rotation of fragments in degree, D is the center point displacement, and r is the rotation span which equals to the radius of the circular plate as indicated in Fig. 9d. By considering neat PC and PC incorporating 1.0 wt%
MWCNTs for comparison, the carrying moment capacities per unit length for the neat (Mneat) and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs
(M1.0 %) are computed from the exure tests as 14.2 and20.5 N m/mm, respectively. The maximum deections observed during the impact tests were 12.5- and 10.8-mm for the neat and 1.0 wt% MWCNTs, respectively. Considering the geometrical relationships for the two cases as shown in Fig. 9b, c, the ratio of the absorbed energy between the neat PC and PC incorporating 1.0 wt% MWCNTs can be written as a function of the ratio of number of crack lines as follows
I:E:1:0 %
I:E:Neat
n1:0% M1:0% a2 D1:0%
nneat Mneat a1 Dneat
Fig. 10 SEM images of epoxy incorporating 1.0 % MWCNTs with different magnications showing how CNTs are connected to the
polymer matrix.
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016) | 549
Aggregates Epoxy-Powder mixture
Voids Aggregates
Voids Epoxy-Powder mixture
(a) Neat epoxy PC (b) 1.0% MWCNTs-epoxy PC
Fig. 11 9100 magnication microscopic images showing homogenous mixture of polymer concrete composites.
450
Absorbance (Arbitary Units)
3950
3450
2950
2450
1950
1450
950
Wave number (cm-1)
Neat 1% COOH-MWCNTs
Fig. 12 FTIR spectra of neat epoxy and epoxy incorporating COOH-functionalized MWCNTs. Inset shows close look of the FTIR
spectra at wave numbers of interest.
550 | International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016)
3.3 Microstructural Features of PC
Fracture surfaces of epoxy sample incorporating 1.0 wt% MWCNTs were investigated by SEM. SEM images in Fig. 10 show well dispersed MWCNTs in the epoxy matrix. Figure 10 displays four images of the same fracture surface with varying magnications showing MWCNTs (indicated by yellow arrows) as longitudinal tubular bers bridging epoxy fracture surfaces and connecting epoxy parts together. SEM images provide excellent evidence on the role that MWCNTs play in keeping the epoxy matrix intact and limiting crack propagation. This explains the ability of MWCNTs to increase energy absorption and energy dissipation inside PC. Furthermore, the microscopic images shown in Fig. 11 prove that a homogenous mixture of polymer concrete composites is achieved with and without the addition of MWCNTs.
This improvement in mechanical properties of epoxy might be attributed to the chemical reaction between the carboxylic groups on the MWCNTs surface and the epoxy
groups. This reaction was conrmed from the FTIR analysis of neat epoxy and epoxy/COOH-MWCNTs (1 wt%) shown in Fig. 12. In FTIR, the presence of any chemical bond can be identied by the location and the intensity of its peak along the wave length spectra as reported in the literature. The typical characteristic peaks of the siloxane-epoxy appeared at 32503500 cm-1 (mOH), 27502940 cm-1 (msym and masym of CH), 1612/1510 cm-1 (aromatic C=C), 1460 cm-1 (dCH, CH2 and CH3), 10391100 cm-1 (-mSiOSi and mCOC), 1250828 cm-1 (dCH in SiCH3), and
560 cm-1 (dSiOSi) as reported by Byczyski et al. (2015), Wang et al. (2011), and Kwon et al. (2011). Similar peak absorptions appeared for epoxy/COOH-MWCNTs shown in the same gure. However, comparison of the carbonyl region in both spectra, as shown in Fig. 12 inset, conrms the presence of small absorption peak at 1738 cm-1 in the
epoxy/COOH-MWCNTs specimen that does not appear in the neat epoxy reaction. This peak is attributed to C = O of ester formed during the rst mixing step of MWCNTs and
epoxy resin by the reaction of carboxylic group of MWCNTs and the hydroxyl group of epoxy (Zou et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2004). Furthermore, during the second step of curing epoxy, the remaining carboxyl groups reacted with the hardener and formed amide groups resulting in C=O peak at *1660 cm-1
as shown in the inset of Fig. 12. Similar C=O peaks were reported before in using COOH functionalized MWCNTs for improving fracture toughness of carbon ber composites (Borowski et al. 2015). It is important to note that that amide peak in the COOHMWCNTsepoxy nanocomposite at 1660 cm-1 appears combined with the aromatic and NH deformation peaks in neat epoxy (Tsai et al. 2015). This explains the peak appearing in the neat epoxy spectra and the difference in the relative heights of this peak in both spectra.
The above microstructural analysis shows that the improvement of mechanical properties of PC with MWCNTs can be attributed to the chemical reactivity of the COOH-functionalized MWCNTs with the polymer matrix producing a new epoxy-MWCNTs nanocomposite with improved mechanical characteristics specically strength, ductility and energy absorption. In the meantime, it is obvious that the relatively high aspect ratio of MWCNTs results in enabling them to work as bers reinforcing PC and limiting crack propagation and enabling energy dissipation. Further research is warranted to understand the fracture mechanics of PC incorporating MWCNTs. It is important to understand how the change in the epoxy matrix due to incorporating MWCNTs would affect the adhesion between epoxy and the aggregate particles compared with neat PC. Future research should enable engineering new impact resistant PCs needed from many applications.
4. Conclusions
PC incorporating MWCNTs has a higher impact resistance than neat PC. In particular, incorporating 1.0 wt% MWCNTs in PC per weight of the epoxy resin during PC fabrication resulted in signicantly increased impact energy absorption of PC by 36 % compared with neat PC. Moreover, PC incorporating MWCNTs was more capable of dissipating the impact energy compared with neat PC. The increase in energy dissipation for PC incorporating MWCNTs resulted in a signicant reduction in impact striker velocity after penetration and an increase of cracking density compared with neat PC. This improvement in the impact energy absorption and dissipation are in line with the improvement in the exural strength of PC and might be explained by the change in the microstructure of the epoxy matrix. The change in the microstructure stems from the ability of the COOH functionalized MWCNTs to bridge the polymer matrix microcracks with its (1030 lm) length and very high aspect ratio (about 1000) to continue carrying load. Microstructural investigations proved the good dispersion of MWCNTs in PC matrix and provided evidence that a chemical reaction of COOH functionalized MWCNTs with epoxy matrix takes place creating a new epoxy-MWCNTs nanocomposite with improved mechanical properties
specically ductility and energy absorption. On the other hand, the addition of 1.5 wt% MWCNTs limited the improvements on the impact and exure of PC. Such relatively large amounts of MWCNTs reduce the owability of the epoxy resin resulting in more entrapped air within the PC material. The presence of entrapped air adversely affects the mechanical properties of PC. In general, the changes in the microstructure of PC using 1.0 wt% MWCNTs can benet the design of new class of PC structural elements with enhanced impact resistance and ductility for infrastructure applications.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by STC.UNM fund for investigating fatigue and impact strength of PC using MWCNTs. Support to the third author by STDF-CSE 5213 Polymer Nanocomposite Centre, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI) is much appreciated. The donation of polymer concrete materials by Transpo Industries is greatly appreciated.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http:// http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
References
ACI Committee 548. (2009). Polymers and adhesives in concrete. State of the Art Report.
Algaard, W., Lyle, J., & Izatt, C. (2005). Perforation of composite oors. In 5th European LS-DYNA users conference, Birmingham, UK (pp. 11231130).
ASTM C1437. (2009). Standard test method for ow of hydraulic cement mortar. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM C579-01. (2012). Standard test methods for compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM C78. (2002). Standard test method for exural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third point loading). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM D4475. (2008). Standard test method for apparent horizontal shear strength of pultruded reinforced plastic rods by the short-beam method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM D7136/D7136M. (2007). Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a ber-reinforced
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016) | 551
using esterication. Bulletin-Korean Chemical Society, 25(9), 13011302.
Kwon, Y., Yim, B. S., Kim, J. M., & Kim, J. (2011). Mechanical and wetting properties of epoxy resins: Amine-containing epoxy-terminated siloxane oligomer with or without reductant. Microelectronics Reliability, 51(4), 819825.Laurenzi, S., Pastore, R., Giannini, G., & Marchetti, M. (2013).
Experimental study of impact resistance in multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy. Composite Structures, 99, 6268.
Li, W., & Xu, J. (2009). Mechanical properties of basalt ber reinforced geopolymeric concrete under impact loading.Materials Science and Engineering A, 505(1), 178186.Ma, P. C., & Kim, J. K. (2011). Carbon nanotubes for polymer reinforcement. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Magrez, A., Seo, J. W., Smajda, R., Mioni, M., & Forr, L. (2010). Catalytic CVD synthesis of carbon nanotubes: Towards high yield and low temperature growth. Materials, 3(11), 48714891.
Martnez-Barrera, G., & Brostow, W. (2010). Effect of marble particle size and gamma irradiation on mechanical properties of polymer concrete. e-Polymers, 10(1), 663676.Nam, I. W., & Lee, H. K. (2015). Image analysis and DC conductivity measurement for the evaluation of carbon nanotube distribution in cement matrix. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(4), 427438.
Orak, S. (2000). Investigation of vibration damping onp concrete with polyester resin. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(2), 171174.
Park, S. J., Park, W. B., & Lee, J. R. (2000). Characterization of the impact properties of three-dimensional glass fabric-reinforced vinyl ester matrix composites. Journal of Materials Science, 35(24), 61516154.
Pegoretti, A., Cristelli, I., & Migliaresi, C. (2008). Experimental optimization of the impact energy absorption of epoxy carbon laminates through controlled delamination. Composites Science and Technology, 68(13), 26532662.Radliska, A., McCarthy, L. M., Matzke, J., & Nagel, F. (2014).
Synthesis of DOT use of beam end protection for extending the life of bridges. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 8(3), 185199.
Rebeiz, K. S., & Craft, A. P. (2002). Polymer concrete using coal y ash. Journal of Energy EngineeringASCE, 128(3), 6273.
Rebeiz, K. S., Serhal, S. P., & Craft, A. P. (2004). Properties of polymer concrete using y ash. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 16(1), 1519.
Reda Taha, M. M., Kandil, U., & Soliman, E. (2013). Generation of polymer concrete incorporating carbon nanotubes.US Patent # 8,426,501 B1.
Reda Taha, M. M., Taha, E. O., & Genedy, M. (2014). Monitoring fatigue damage propagation in GFRP using carbon nanotubes, In Proceedings of American Society for Composites 29th technical conference, 16th US-Japan conference on composite materials, San Diego, CA.
Riisgaard, B., Ngo, T., Mendis, P., Georgakis, C. T., & Stang, H. (2007). Dynamic increase factors for high performance
552 | International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016)
polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Batarlar B. (2013). Behavior of reinforced concrete slabs subjected to impact loads. MSc Thesis, Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey.
Beaumont, P. W. R., Riewald, P. G., & Zweben, C. (1975). Methods for improving the impact resistance of composite materials. In Foreign object impact damage to composites. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Bignozzi, M. C., Saccani, A., & Sandrolini, F. (2000). New polymer mortars containing polymeric wastes. Part 1. Microstructure and mechanical properties. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 31(2), 97106. Borowski, E., Soliman, E., Kandil, U. F., & Taha, M. R. (2015).
Interlaminar fracture toughness of CFRP laminates incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymers, 7(6), 10201045.
Byczyski, ., Dutkiewicz, M., & Maciejewski, H. (2015). Synthesis and properties of high-solids hybrid materials obtained from epoxy functional urethanes and siloxanes. Progress in Organic Coatings, 84, 5969.
Choudhary, V., & Gupta, A. (2011). Polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Carbon Nanotubes-Polymer Nanocomposites, 2011, 6590.
Ganguli, S., Bhuyan, M., Allie, L., & Aglan, H. (2005). Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforcement on the fracture behavior of a tetrafunctional epoxy. Journal of Materials Science, 40(13), 35933595.
Gojny, F. H., Wichmann, M. H., Fiedler, B., Bauhofer, W., & Schulte, K. (2005). Inuence of nano-modication on the mechanical and electrical properties of conventional bre-reinforced composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 36(11), 15251535.
Huang, J., Zhang, Q., Zhao, M., & Wei, F. (2012). A review of the large-scale production of carbon nanotubes: The practice of nanoscale process engineering. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(23), 157166.
ISO 6603-2. (2000). PlasticsDetermination of puncture impact behaviour of rigid plasticsPart 2: Instrumented impact testing. Dublin, Ireland: European Standards, National Standards Authority of Ireland.
Izatt, C., May, I. M., Lyle, J., Chen, Y., & Algaard, W. (2009). Perforation owing to impacts on reinforced concrete slabs. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 162(1), 3744.
Jiang, X., & Drzal, L. T. (2011). Improving electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of high density polyethylene through incorporation of parafn wax coated exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets and multi-wall carbon nano-tubes. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 42(11), 18401849.
Jo, B. W., Tae, G. H., & Kim, C. H. (2007). Uniaxial creep behavior and prediction of recycled-PET polymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 21(7), 15521559. Johansen, K. W. (1962). Yield-line theory. London, UK: Cement and Concrete Association, Technology & Engineering. Kim, W. J., Kang, S. O., Ah, C. S., Lee, Y. W., Ha, D. H., Choi,I. S., et al. (2004). Functionalization of shortened SWCNTs
concrete in compression using split Hopkinson pressure bar. In International conference of fracture mechanics of concrete structures. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.
Roessler, D. M. (1965). Kramers-Kronig analysis of reection data. British Journal of Applied Physics, 16(8), 1119. Sett, K., & Vipulanandan, C. (2004). Properties of polyester polymer concrete with glass and carbon bers. ACI Materials Journal, 101(1), 3041.
Sharma, R., & Iqbal, Z. (2004). In situ observations of carbon nanotube formation using environmental transmission electron microscopy. Applied Physics Letters, 84(6), 990992.
Soliman, E., Al-Haik, M., & Taha, M. R. (2012a). On and off-axis tension behavior of ber reinforced polymer composites incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Composite Materials, 46(14), 16611675.
Soliman, E. M., Sheyka, M. P., & Taha, M. R. (2012b). Low-velocity impact of thin woven carbon fabric composites incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 47, 3947.
Swain, S., Sharma, R. A., Patil, S., Bhattacharya, S., Gadiyaram, S. P., & Chaudhari, L. (2012). Effect of allyl modied/silane modied multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the electrical properties of unsaturated polyester resin composites. Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials, 13(6), 267272.
Tan, C. W., Tan, K. H., Ong, Y. T., Mohamed, A. R., Zein, S.H. S., & Tan, S. H. (2012). Energy and environmental applications of carbon nanotubes. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 10(3), 265273.
Tawk, M. E., & Eskander, S. B. (2006). Polymer concrete from marble wastes and recycled poly (ethylene terephthalate). Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 38(1), 6579. Ting, J. H., Lyu, J. Y., Huang, F. Y., Li, T. L., Hsu, C. L., & Liu,C. W. (2008). Synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes by atmospheric thermal CVD. In University/Government/Industry Micro/Nano Symposium (UGIM 2008), 17th Biennial (pp. 157160). Louisville, KY: IEEE.
Tsai, C. W., Wu, K. H., Yang, C. C., & Wang, G. P. (2015). Adamantane-based epoxy resin and siloxane-modied adamantane-based epoxy resin: Characterization of thermal, dielectric and optical properties. Reactive & Functional Polymers, 91, 1118.
Viets, C., Mannov, E., Buschhorn, S., & Schulte, K. (2009). Laminate lay-up inuence on sensing properties of carbon
nanotube modied GFRP via electrical conductivity methods. In 16th international conference on composite structures (ICCS 16), Porto, Portugal.
Wang, B., Chen, R., Zhang, T., & Jiang, X. (2003). The application of polymer concrete in the aireld rapid repair. In Proceedings of the international conference on advances in concrete and structures (ICACS 2003), RILEM Publications, Bagneux, France (pp. 691695).
Wang, S., Li, Y., Fei, X., Sun, M., Zhang, X., Li, Y., et al. (2011). Preparation of a durable superhydrophobic membrane by electrospinning poly (vinylidene uoride)(PVDF) mixed with epoxysiloxane modied SiO2 nanoparticles: A possible route to superhydrophobic surfaces with low water sliding angle and high water contact angle. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 359(2), 380388.
Wang, T., Zhang, J., Bai, W., & Hao, S. (2013). Forming process and mechanical properties of bers-reinforced polymer concrete. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 32(12), 907911.
Xu, J. Y., Li, W. M., Fan, F. L., & Bai, E. L. (2010). Experimental study on impact properties of carbon ber reinforced geopolymeric concrete using a SHPB. Journal of Building Materials, 13(4), 6669.
Zamal, H. H. (2011). Monitoring fatigue damage behavior of glass/epoxy composites using carbon nanotubes as sensors. PhD dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Zhou, D., & Chow, L. (2003). Complex structure of carbon nanotubes and their implications for formation mechanism. Journal of Applied Physics, 93(12), 99729976.
Zhu, J., Kim, J., Peng, H., Margrave, J. L., Khabashesku, V. N., & Barrera, E. V. (2003). Improving the dispersion and integration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in epoxy composites through functionalization. Nano Letters, 3(8), 11071113.
Zhu, J., Peng, H., Rodriguez-Macias, F., Margrave, J. L., Khabashesku, V. N., Imam, A. M., et al. (2004). Reinforcing epoxy polymer composites through covalent integration of functionalized nanotubes. Advanced Functional Materials, 14(7), 643648.
Zou, W., Du, Z. J., Liu, Y. X., Yang, X., Li, H. Q., & Zhang, C. (2008). Functionalization of MWNTs using polyacryloyl chloride and the properties of CNTepoxy matrix nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology, 68(15), 32593264.
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (Vol.10, No.4, December 2016) | 553
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials is a copyright of Springer, 2016.
Abstract
Polymer concrete (PC) has been favoured over Portland cement concrete when low permeability, high adhesion, and/or high durability against aggressive environments are required. In this research, a new class of PC incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs) is introduced. Four PC mixes with different MWCNTs contents were examined. MWCNTs were carefully dispersed in epoxy resin and then mixed with the hardener and aggregate to produce PC. The impact strength of the new PC was investigated by performing low-velocity impact tests. Other mechanical properties of the new PC including compressive, flexural, and shear strengths were also characterized. Moreover, microstructural characterization using scanning electron microscope and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of PC incorporating MWCNTs was performed. Impact test results showed that energy absorption of PC with 1.0 wt% MWCNTs by weight of epoxy resin was significantly improved by 36 % compared with conventional PC. Microstructural analysis demonstrated evidence that MWCNTs significantly altered the chemical structure of epoxy matrix. The changes in the microstructure lead to improvements in the impact resistance of PC, which would benefit the design of various PC structural elements.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer