It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
It is argued that scientific research in psychology can only be
grounded on the questions framed in the logic of a general
theory. Psychology lacks such a general theory, mainly due to
prevailing conceptual confusion in its disciplinary language.
Confusion derives from the assumption that psychological
terms in ordinary language denote special entities or processes,
and from erroneous identification of words with things and
events. It is asserted that any scientific research methodology
depends upon a general theory, so that there are no autonomous
methodologies that by themselves justify or validate
the research findings. It is pointed out the existence of at least
eight different ontological paradigms and, therefore, eight different, immeasurable psychologies that, although using the
same terms, raise different questions about non comparable
psychological phenomena. Some problems of psychological
research derived from this state of affairs are examined and
some initial steps to overcome it are proposed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer