It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite intensive studies on the complex perovskite Pb(Fe2/3W1/3)O3 (PFWO) relaxor, understanding the exact nature of its multifunctional properties has remained a challenge for decades. In this work we report a comprehensive structural study of the PFWO single crystals using a combination of synchrotron X-ray diffraction and high-resolution electron microscopy. The set of {h + ½, k + ½, l + ½} superlattice reflections was observed for the first time based on single-crystal synchrotron X-ray experiments (100–450 K) and transmission electron microscopy investigations, which indicates some kind of B-cation ordering in PFWO which had been thought to be totally disordered. It was found that (1) the crystal structure of PFWO should be described by a partly ordered cubic perovskite (i.e. Fm − 3m), (2) the weak ferromagnetic properties and excess magnetic moment of PFWO can be understood based on non-random distribution of Fe cations between the 4a and 4b sites, and (3) the Pb displacement disorder is present in this material and the cations are probably displaced along the <100> directions. The X-ray diffraction results of this investigation show that partial cation ordering indeed exists in PFWO, which makes it necessary to revisit the generally accepted interpretations of the results obtained up to date. In agreement with X-ray diffraction study the main results of TEM study include: (1) a long range order that can be described with the Fm − 3m symmetry is reliably detected, (2) the coherence length of that long range order is in the order of 1–2 nm and (3) no remarkable chemical inhomogeneity is found in the tested PFWO crystal, excluding the possibility of a compositional ordering arising from substitutional defects in the perovskite structure.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.14476.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 9668); Uppsala University, Department of Engineering Sciences, Solid State Physics, Angstrom Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.8993.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9457)
2 A. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.431939.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0404 6786)
3 Uppsala University, Department of Engineering Sciences, Solid State Electronics, Angstrom Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.8993.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9457)
4 The University of Chicago, NSF’s ChemMatCARS Beamline@APS, Argonne, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)
5 Simon Fraser University, Department of Chemistry and 4D LABS, Burnaby, Canada (GRID:grid.61971.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7494)