ABSTRACT
LATIF, A.A., KANHAI, G.K., HOVE, T., MASAKA, S. & PEGRAM, R.G. 2001. Epidemiological observations of Zimbabwean theileriosis: Disease incidence and pathogenicity in susceptible cattle during Rhipicephalus appendiculatus nymphal and adult seasonal activity. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 68:187-195
Fifty-nine Hereford cattle susceptible to tick-borne diseases were used as tracer animals to assess the tick challenge and pathogenicity of Theileria parva under field conditions in Zimbabwe. They were moved periodically in groups of five to three commercial farms (one group consisted of four) during seasons of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus nymphal and adult activity. All tracer cattle were herded together with the farm cattle but were not dipped. The nymphal tick counts were high on two of the farms (up to 2000 per animal) but were very low on the third farm (less than ten per animal). On the three farms, 19 out of 24 (76 %) tracers had patent Theileria schizonts. There was a range of clinical manifestations of theileriosis with acute and fatal infections occurring on one farm. The adult R. appendiculatus infestations during the wet season numbered 120-800 per animal on the three farms. The disease transmitted by the adults was very pathogenic on the three farms; 30 out of 35 (86 %) had severe theileriosis infections. Cattle, which survived the nymphal diseases challenge, showed various degrees of immunity to subsequent T parva challenge transmitted by adult ticks. Therefore, 13 out of 18 (72 %) of these cattle had a second disease episode and the case fatality rate on the three farms was 46 %. The factors which determined the epidemiological status of Theileria challenge on the farms, such as the farming systems and presence of wild animals, are discussed.
Keywords: Cattle, epidemiology, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Theileria parva, Zimbabwe
INTRODUCTION
Zimbabwean theileriosis caused by Theileria parva (bovis) (Lawrence 1979; Uilenberg, Perie, Lawrence, Paling & Spanjer 1982) is a complex disease syndrome related to its tick vector Rhipicephalus appendiculatus population changes and other factors which determine the epidemiology of the disease, namely, type of cattle, cattle management practices and tick control. In Zimbabwe and other countries within the region, the different instars of R. appendiculatus exhibit a strict pattern of seasonal occurrence with one generation occurring each year (Jooste 1966a; Matson & Norval 1977; Short & Norval 1981 a).The adults are mostly active and abundant in the rainy season (mid December to May), larvae in the cool dry season (March to October) and nymphs in the dry months of June to October.
In the years 1914-1946, deaths from the then recently introduced East Coast fever (ECF) caused by T parva occurred throughout the year in Zimbabwe (Matson 1967). However, after the supposed eradication of ECF in 1954, the disease occurrence pattern has changed (Matson 1967; Koch 1990; Lawrence 1991). A variant form of theileriosis, believed to produce milder infections, occurs mainly during the rainy season each year and was known initially as "Specific disease" and was later named "January disease" or "Rhodesian- Zimbabwean theileriosis" (Koch 1990). Since then, more than 95% of the theileriosis outbreaks reported in the country have been recorded during the period of adult tick activity. Nymphal ticks have not been related to any significant disease transmission (Koch 1990).
A number of explanations have been put forward to explain the observed change in disease occurrence and its pathogenicity. Norval, Lawrence, Young, Perry, Dolan & Scott (1991) and Lawrence (1991) postulated that the current populations of R. appendiculatus in Zimbabwe are different from the populations which were introduced with the cattle from East Africa and were responsible for the transmissions of ECF prior to 1946. The eradication of ECF from Zimbabwe may have been associated with the simultaneous eradication of the introduced East African strains of the non-diapausing tick populations. Diapausing tick strains, which are thought to have survived, continued to transmit the T. parva in a seasonal pattern. These theories have not been derived either from field studies or through regular close monitoring of the disease forms over the passage of time.
The objective of this study was to examine the disease occurrence more closely and to attempt to understand the epidemiology of Zimbabwean theileriosis. Field experiments were carried out during 1990-1992 in which susceptible cattle were exposed periodically under natural conditions during the season of adult or nymphal tick activity in order to assess the prevalence of theileriosis associated with adult activity and to investigate the potential role played by nymphs in the transmission of the disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Selection of study farms
About 54 % of cattle on commercial farms in Zimbabwe are found in Mashonaland West Province (Koch 1990). This province is situated within the high rainfall area where R. appendiculatus and Zimbabwean theileriosis are most common (Koch 1990).
Three commercial farms located between 100 and 180 km west of Harare were selected for intensive epidemiological studies from June 1990 to April 1992.
Ayrshire farm-Banket
Six hundred Bos taurus and high-grade crossbreds of different types were present on Ayrshire farm. Tick management was by regular weekly dipping in Barricade acaricide. The farm had no previous record of theileriosis for the 9 years preceding 1989. An outbreak of Zimbabwean theileriosis in which 20 cattle died occurred during June to July 1989 coinciding with the period of R. appendiculatus nymphal activity. A further 18 cattle died and another 20 were treated for theileriosis during the following rainy season (February to March). The wild animals present on the farm included kudus (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), bushpigs (Potamochoerus porus) and guinea fowls (Numida meleagris).
Chikeya farm-Banket
The Chikeya farm in the Banket district borders Ayrshire farm and 210 crossbred cattle of different types were present. It had a previous history of theileriosis outbreaks for three consecutive years (1987-1990). The farm was poorly managed and tick control using pour-on formulations of synthetic pyrethroids was introduced in 1990. The same species of wild animals were also present on the farm but occurred in larger numbers than on Ayrshire farm.
Botha farm-Karoi
Botha Farm in the Karoi district had 660 crossbred cattle of different types. Theileriosis outbreaks had occurred in 1989-1990 but cattle management and tick control by dipping were subsequently improved. The farmer was more interested in wild animals and various species had been introduced. About 700 head of different species were recorded at the start of the experiment including kudus, impalas (Aepyceros melampus), sable antelopes (Hippotragus niger), reedbucks (Redunca arundinum), bushbucks (Tragelaphus scriptus), duikers (Sylvicapra grimmia), bushpigs, warthogs (Phacochaerus aethiopicus), hares (Lepus capensis) and guinea fowls. They grazed the same paddocks as the cattle.
Cattle husbandry
Cattle on three the farms grazed on natural pastures and were rotated between paddocks. Maize was also cultivated. In 1991 cattle on Ayrshire farm were moved to maize crop residue fields (early maize) from April to June and again from September to November after the main crop harvest. There was a good harvest in 1992 and the cattle were kept on the maize fields from April to mid-August. On Botha and Chikeya farms, the maize fields were smaller and the cattle were kept in these fields during May and June 1991 and July and August 1991 on the two farms, respectively.
Animals and observations
A total of 59 susceptible Hereford cattle (7 months old) were obtained from a farm near Harare, where theileriosis outbreaks had not occurred during the previous 16 years, and used as tracers. Blood smears from these animals were free of piroplasms and serum samples were negative for antibodies to T. parva schizont antigen in the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFA) (Burridge & Kimber 1972). The cattle were periodically moved in groups of five onto the three farms (Table 1) during the period of nymphal or of adult tick activity to assess the possible incidence of the tick-borne theileriosis challenge from 1990-1992. In the rainy season of 1991, two groups were introduced-one in January and one in February-onto each of Ayrshire and Chikeya farms. Only two groups were moved to Botha farm-one (four animals) in the nymphal and the other in the adult tick seasons of 1991-1992. All tracer cattle were herded together with the farm cattle but were not dipped. They were given Imizol (imidocarb dipropionate) at a dose rate of 2.5mo/100 kg body mass on the day before they were placed on the farms to control Babesia and Anaplasma infections and the same dose was repeated on day 14.
Cattle which survived the nymphal tick season, were kept on the farms and monitored during the following rainy season. The observations made included: daily rectal temperature, examination of blood smears on a weekly bases, daily palpation of superficial lymph nodes and examination of biopsy smears made from these nodes when they were enlarged. The development of antibody titres to T parva antigens was assessed using the IFA test after 30 days of their introduction on Ayrshire and Chikeya farms during the first exposure in 1991-1992. Theileria parva reactions in cattle was classified according to that of Hove, Musisi, Kanhai, Latif, Masaka, Munatswa, Pegram, Kamwendo, Quiroga, Mwangondwe & Dolan (1995). East Coast fever was confirmed as the cause of death in most fatal cases by necropsy and examination of liver and spleen impression smears (Norval, Perry & Young 1992). Rhipicephalus appendiculatus adults and nymphs were counted in situ on the animals twice a month.
Some of the tracer cattle were allowed to undergo severe to fatal infections during the first year of observation for two reasons. Firstly, there is a general belief that T. parva in Zimbabwe produces mild infections in cattle when compared with the disease caused by T parva in East Africa and it was considered imperative to monitor the disease syndrome in the tracers, with minimum intervention, to assess the pathogenicity of T parva in Zimbabwe. Secondly, there were very few cases of theileriosis during the winter season, the period of nymphal tick activity. In the second year of the experiment, all animals developing severe theileriosis reactions were treated with buparvaquone (Butalex, Coopers-Moore) at a dose rate of 2.5mg/kg.
Theileria tick pick-up and cattle infectivity
On each of the farms laboratory-reared R. appendiculatus nymphs were allowed to feed on some of the tracer cattle when they were suffering from acute theileriosis and piroplasms were detected in their blood smears. Engorged nymphs were collected and the infection rates with Theileria parasite in the adults were assessed according to the method of Blewett & Branagan (1973). In addition, the infectivity of some of the ticks was assessed by allowing them to feed on susceptible cattle under laboratory conditions. Four tick batches were obtained and examined in this way-from animal 270 introduced on Chikeya farm on 30 June 1990, animals S7 and S22 introduced on Chikeya in January to February 1991 and animal S24 from Ayrshire in January 1991.
RESULTS
Ayrshire farm
First exposure of susceptible cattle during nymphal and adult tick activity seasons (1990-1991) (Fig.1)
In the first group of five cattle that was placed on the farm in June 1990 the counts of R. appendiculatus nymphs were high (up to 2000 per animal) by July to August 1990 and then decreased towards the end of October. The infections with Theileria parasites in the tracer cattle were mild during the season. All of them showed a schizont parasitosis, which was detected only once or twice in each animal. Four out of the five animals developed significant antibody titres (1/640) to T parva schizont antigens by day 30 after being placed on the farm. Adult ticks were first noticed on them by mid-December and the highest counts were recorded in February 1991 (750 per animal). One animal died on 25 December 1990 but the cause of death was not determined. The remaining four animals all suffered from a second theileriosis infection. The reactions in two animals (A32 and A36) were severe and both died-one on 15 January and the other on 22 January 1991. The two remaining animals recovered spontaneously without treatment.
The adult tick counts on the second group of five tracer cattle which were introduced on 17 January 1991 were also high, ranging from 1500 to 2000 per animal in January and February. It was responsible for a severe Theileria parasite challenge as all of them developed fatal infections (Table 1).
In the third group of five animals that was placed on the farm in February 1991, two developed mild theileriosis reactions and the remaining three had severe reactions; two died and one recovered following treatment (Table 1). Second exposure during 1991-1992 (Fig. 1)
The nymphal tick infestations in the first group of tracers that were introduced in June 1991 were low during June to end of July and became higher between August and September (350-1600 per animal). All five animals became infected with Theileria parasites. Schizonts were detected for 2 weeks but only two of them showed moderate reactions. One animal (Ri 8) developed two disease episodes but survived. The responses of the cattle to the subsequent The/leria challenge that coincided with adult tick activity were different. Two of the cattle (Rl 11 and R1 3), which had reacted mildly, developed a second theileriosis episode with prolonged illness and slow recovery. On the other hand, the two cattle (R15 and R18) which reacted moderately during the nymphal season, resisted further challenge and survived the rainy season. The fifth animal (R5) died in December 1992 but a necropsy was not done.
The adult tick counts on the second group of susceptible cattle exposed in January 1992 during the rainy season were high (up to 1000). The subsequent theileriosis challenge was severe. They were all treated by day 25-28 after initial exposure (Table 1) but in spite of this treatment, one animal died acutely.
Chikeya farm
First exposure during the nymphal and adult tick activity season 1990-1991 (Fig. 2)
In the first group of five tracer animals that was released on the farm in June 1990 the nymphal tick counts during June to September were low and ranged between 100-300. However, the theileriosis challenge was high. All animals had severe reactions for up to two months but only one animal died of acute theileriosis (day 71). Two animals had prolonged convalescences. Four of the five animals developed significant antibody titres (1/640) to T parva antigens by day 30 after exposure. Adult ticks were seen on the animals by mid-December 1991. The cattle had different responses to the challenge. Two had a second severe and fatal infection, one died on 8 January 1991 and the other on 14 January 1991. The remaining animals, which had severe infections during the previous challenge showed mild to moderate reactions and recovered.
The second and third groups, each comprising five tracer animals were introduced in January and February 1991, respectively. They became infested with 600 adult ticks per animal during February. The Theileria challenge in the two groups was severe-five cattle died, four were treated for acute infection and one had mild reaction and recovered (Table 1).
Second exposure 1991-1992 (Fig. 2)
The nymphal infestation on the five tracers that were released on the farm in June 1991 was low during June to August. The tick counts increased from October to November.
Despite these low infestations during June and July, the theileriosis challenge was high. Four of the five cattle developed severe reactions within the first 2 weeks of exposure and two died of acute infections on days 38 and 42. There was a second disease episode as nymphal counts increased during October and November. One animal (1359) reacted moderately while animal (137), which reacted during this period only, developed a severe and fatal theileriosis reaction on day 143. The two surviving cattle resisted further Theileria challenges during the following adult tick season.
The adult tick activity started in mid-December. Higher infestations (400-500 per animal) were counted on the second group of five tracers that was introduced in January 1992.
All animals in this group developed acute theileriosisthree died, one was treated and one recovered spontaneously (Table 1).
Botha farm
Cattle exposure during 1991 and 1992 (Fig. 3)
The nymphal tick infestation on the first group of four tracer cattle that was released on the farm in June 1991 was very low, about ten per animal from July to October. The subsequent theileriosis challenge was also very low and only one animal had a few schizonts on day 21.
The adult tick numbers on the animals during January and February 1992 was about ten times the nymphal counts. During this period two of the animals developed fatal infections while the other two did not show any apparent reaction and survived.
The second group of tracers was introduced in January 1992 and developed severe theileriosis infections-two died, two were treated and one recovered spontaneously (Table 1).
Transmission attempts and parasite isolation
The details of the R. appendiculatus adult ticks fed as nymphs on some reacting tracers and their infectivity to susceptible animals are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The infection rates with Theileria parasites in the salivary glands were high (27-80 %) but the average number of infected acini per infected tick was low (6-10 in three of the four batches). Three of the tick batches, two from Chikeya and one from Ayrshire farms, were obtained from tracers which became sick during the period of adult tick activity, and produced severe reactions when fed on susceptible cattle in the laboratory. However, the ticks obtained from animal 270 that became sick during the nymphal activity on Chikeya farm produced only mild reactions in the recipient calf.
DISCUSSION
The study has demonstrated the occurrence of clinical theileriosis in the susceptible tracers which were exposed to unlimited tick challenge on commercial farms during the season of R. appendiculatus nymphal activity. The nymphal tick counts on the animals were high on two of the farms and low on the third farm, where a large number of wild animals were present. On the three farms, 19 out of 25 tracer cattle (76%) had patent Theileria schizonts and a range of clinical manifestations were seen. Acute and fatal infections occurred on only one farm which confirms out-of-season theileriosis, also known as "winter theileriosis".
Results of laboratory transmission studies of T. parva with nymphs are conflicting. Koch (1990) was able to transmit T parva with six out of 13 different tick batches using both high and low numbers of nymphs. Some of the recipient cattle developed severe and fatal infections. Rhipicephalus zambeziensis nymphs were also shown to transmit both T parva and T taurotragi (Walker, Norval & Corwin 1981). However, in one attempt with R. appendiculatus nymphs these workers failed to transmit T parva. The failure of R. appendiculatus nymphs to transmit Theileria in these few laboratory studies led to the belief that nymphs are not involved in the transmission of clinical diseases, contradicting previous results. The results were also used to support the field observations on the seasonal occurrence of theileriosis outbreaks (Matson 1967; Koch 1990) while many assumptions and much speculation have been made on the supposed eradication of ECF from Zimbabwe (Lawrence 1991; Norval et al. 1991).
In Zimbabwe, R. appendiculatus adults and nymphs occur in succession during a 12-month period (Jooste 1966a, b; Matson & Norval 1977; Short & Norval 1981 a, b). The present study has shown the transmission of Theileria by nymphs between June and December and by adult ticks between January and April. The disease transmitted by adult ticks was pathogenic on all the farms. However, there were variations in disease incidence and virulence during the nymphal season. These variations were related to factors which determine the epidemiological status of the disease on the farms such as the presence of wild animals and the type of cattle management practices as set out below.
Ecological studies on R. appendiculatus (Macleod & Colbo 1976) have shown that larvae fed on cattle only are not able to maintain nymphal or adult infestation levels. They suggested that alternative hosts play an important role in maintaining the tick population. Yeoman (1966) has observed that in the presence of wild animals such as hares, mongooses and duikers, cattle may be less important hosts for the larvae. Elands, sables, impalas, kudus, reedbucks and scrub hares were found to be good natural hosts for the larvae and nymphs of R. appendiculatus (Macleod & Colbo 1976; Horak 1982; Norval & Lightfoot 1982).
In one study, Horak (1982) showed that impalas harboured significantly more larvae and nymphs (87% of the total tick counts) than adult ticks, while cattle grazing in the same reserve were heavily infested with adult ticks. Moreover, the seasonal patterns of the ticks on scrub hares were identical to those on cattle (Horak & Fourie 1991). Most of these wild animals were present on the farms in varying numbers because of an increasing interest in keeping species of wild animals, other than buffaloes, together with cattle in order to diversity farming systems. The role played by these animals in maintaining tick populations on the three farms can be clearly identified in the present study. On Botha farm nymphal counts on tracer cattle did not exceed ten per animal during the period of nymphal activity, but subsequent adult counts were about 10-16 times higher. It seems probable that wild animals were supporting most of the larval population. This ecological association between cattle, ticks and wild animals has epidemiological implications on the transmission of theileriosis and its pathogenicity on commercial farms. Firstly, the Theileria parasites derived from these wild animals are of no or low pathogenicity in cattle hosts (Grootenhuis, Young, Dolan & Stagg 1979). Secondly, the challenge from Theileria parva-infected nymphal population may be reduced by feeding on wild animal "refractory hosts". Therefore, the incidence and pathogenicity of theilerial infections in cattle will be reduced.
The second parameter, which would influence the epidemiology of theileriosis on the farms, was the cattle husbandry practice. Ecological studies on ticks have shown that the spatial distribution of the three developmental stages of R. appendiculatus is probably determined by the spatial distribution of their hosts (Minshull 1981). In the present study, cattle were grazed on paddocks during the rainy season (adult tick activity) and moved to maize-residue fields during the dry season (nymphal activity). These maize fields were probably free of ticks as preparation of the land would have started by November to December (rainy season) while crop harvesting was completed by August of the following year. Therefore, cattle were not available as hosts when nymphs were abundant on the pasture. This management practice had partly contributed to a restriction of cattle and tick contact for varying period of time (1 -4 months) depending on the size of the maize fields, and may have reduced the incidence of "winter theileriosis" by breaking the transmission cycle.
Cattle, which survived the T parva challenge transmitted by nymphs and had seroconverted, showed various degrees of immunity to the subsequent challenge transmitted by adult ticks. Thirteen out of 18 (72 %) of these cattle had a second disease episode, and the case fatality on the three farms was 46 % (6 out of 13). This suggests that endemic stability to T parva could not be maintained by natural exposure of the calves during the season of nymphal activity. By using molecular techniques some of these infections on the farms have been characterized as being due to T taurotragi (Bishop, Spooner, Kanhai, Kiarie, Latif, Hove, Masaka & Dolan 1994) which is wide-spread in Zimbabwe (Lawrence 1979; Lawrence & Mackenzie 1980; Koch, Ocama, Munatswa, Byrom, Norval, Spooner, Conrad & Irvin 1988). Cattle, which have recovered from T taurotragi infections, are fully susceptible to T parva challenge (Young, Grootenhuis, Kimber, Kanhai & Stagg 1977; Grootenhuis etaL 1979).
In conclusion, the Zimbabwean theileriosis transmitted by adult R. appendiculatus in natural situations can be highly pathogenic and is comparable to ECF in East Africa. Any breakdown in the present efficient tick control regimen on the commercial farms may result in disastrous outbreaks. Rhipicephalus appendiculatus nymphal transmission of T parva can occur and the parasite may be highly pathogenic and cause economic problems. Under most farming systems applied in Zimbabwe the nymphal transmission of theileriosis is limited by factors which restrict cattie/tick contact such as the presence or absence of wild animals as alternative tick hosts. This epidemiological situation may have existed for several decades and probably explains the gradual change in the pattern of the seasonal occurrence of the disease, which now generally coincides with adult tick activity. The assumptions drawn from the present study may not agree with those of Norval et aL (1991) or with the hypothesis of Lawrence (1991) on the change in pattern of theileriosis transmission related to the elimination of non-diapausing East African strain of R. appendiculatus.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are very grateful to the collaborating farmers for their cooperation, permission to introduce experimental cattle onto their farms, and to use their facilities. We thank Dr TT Dolan who made valuable comments on the manuscript. The work was supported by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, DANIDA and the Government of Zimbabwe.
REFERENCES
BISHOP, R.P., SPOONER, PR., KANHAI, CK., KIARIE, J., LATIF, A.A., HOVE, I, MASAKA, S. & DOLAN, IT 1994. Molecular characterization of Theileria parasites: application to the epidemiology of theileriosis in Zimbabwe. Parasitology, 109:573581.
BLEWETT, D.A. & BRANAGAN, D. 1973. The demonstration of Theileria parva infection in infected Rhipicephalus appendiculatus salivary glands. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 5:27-34.
BURRIDGE, M.J. & KIMBER, C.D. 1972. The indirect fluorescent antibody test for experimental East Coast fever. Research in Veterinary Science, 13:451-455.
GROOTENHUIS, J.G., YOUNG, A.S., DOLAN, IT, & STAGG, D.A. 1979. Characteristics of Theileria species (eland) infection in eland and cattle. Research in Veterinary Science, 27: 59-68.
HORAK, LG. 1982. Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XV. The seasonal prevalence of ectoparasites on impala and cattle in northern Transvaal. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 49:85-93.
HORAK, LG. & FOURIE, L.J. 1991. Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XXIX. Ixodid ticks on hares in the Cape Province and on hares and red rock rabbits in the Orange Free State. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 58:261270.
HOVE, T., MUSISI, F.L., KANHAI, G.K., LATIF, A.A., MASAKA, S., MUNATSWA, F.C., PEGRAM, R.G., KAMWENDO, S.P., QUIROGA, J.C., MWANGONDWE, R. & DOLAN, IT 1995. Challenge of Theileria parva (Boleni)-immunized cattle with selected East African Theileria stocks. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 27:202-211.
JOOSTE, K.F. 1966a. Seasonal incidence of immature stages of the brown ear tick. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal, 63:16-18. JOOSTE, K.F. 1966b. A two-year study of the seasonal occurance
of adult ticks on a herd of Red Poll cows. Rhodesia Agriculaural Journal, 63:97-99.
KOCH, H.T. 1990. Aspects of the epidemiology of January disease (Theileria parva bovis infection) in Zimbabwe. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht.
KOCH, H.T., OCAMA, J.G.R., MUNATSWA, F.C., BYROM, B., NORVAL, R.A.I., SPOONER, P.R., CONRAD, P.A. & IRVIN, A.D. 1988. Isolation and characterization of bovine Theileria parasites in Zimbabwe. Veterinary Parasitology, 28:19-32.
LAWRENCE, J.A. 1979. The differential diagnosis of the bovine theileriosis of Southern Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 50:311-313.
LAWRENCE, J.A. 1991. Retrospective observations on the transmission of East Coast fever in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 23:69-74.
LAWRENCE, J.A. & MACKENZIE, PK.I, 1980. Isolation of a nonpathogenic Theileria of cattle transmitted by Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Zimbabwe Veterinary Journal, 11:27-36.
MACLEOD, J. & COLBO, M.H. 1976. Ecological studies of ixodid ticks (Acari, Ixodidae) in Zambia. I. Cattle as hosts of the larvae of Ambylomma variegatum (F.) and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neum. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 66:65-74.
MATSON, B.A. 1967. Theileriosis in Rhodesia. I. A study of diagnostic specimens over two seasons. Journal of South African Veterinary Medical Association, 38:93-102.
MATSON, B.A. & NORVAL, R.A.1. 1977. The seasonal occurrence of adult ixodid ticks on cattle on a Rhodesian highveld farm. Rhodesia Veterinary Journal, 8:2-6.
MINSHULL, J.l. 1981. Seasonal occurrence, habitat distribution and host range of four ixodid tick species at Kyle recreational park in south eastern Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Veterinary Journal, 12:58-63.
NORVAL, R.A.I., LAWRENCE, J.A., YOUNG, A.S., PERRY, B.D, DOLAN, TT. & SCOTT, J. 1991. Theileria parva: influence of vector, parasite and host relationships on the epidemiology of theileriosis in Southern Africa. Parasitology, 102:347-356.
NORVAL, R.A.I. & LIGHTFOOT, C.J. 1982. Tick problems in wildlife in Zimbabwe. Factors influencing the occurrence and abundance of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Zimbabwe Veterinary Journal, 13:11-20.
NORVAL, R.A.I., PERRY, B.D. &YOUNG, A.S. 1992. The epidemiology of theileriosis in Africa. London: Academic Press.
SHORT, N.J. & NORVAL, R.A.I. 1981a. Regulation of seasonal occurrence in the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann, 1901. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 13:19-26.
SHORT, N.J. & NORVAL, R.A.l. 1981 b. The seasonal activity of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Newmann, 1901 (Acarina: Ixodidae) in the highveld of Zimbabwe, Rhodesia. Journal of Parasitology, 67:77-84.
UILENBERG, G., PERLE, N.M., LAWRENCE, J.A., PALING, R.W. & SPANJER, A.A.M. 1982. Causal agents of bovine theileriosis in Southern Africa. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 14:127-140.
WALKER, J.13., NORVAL, R.A.I. & CORWIN, M.D. 1981. Rhipicephalus zambeziensis sp. nov., a new tick from eastern and southern Africa, together with a redescription of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann, 1901 (Acarina, Ixodida). Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 48:87-104.
YEOMAN, G.H. 1966. Field vector studies of epizootic East Coast fever. 11. Seasonal studies of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus on bovine and non-bovine hosts in East Coast fever enzootic, epizootic and free zones. Bulletin of Epizootic Diseases of Africa, 14:113-140.
YOUNG, A.S. GROOTENHUIS, J.G., KIMBER, C.D., KANHAI, G.K. & STAGG, D.A. 1977. Isolation of a Theileria species from eland (Taurotragus oryx) infective for cattle. Tropenmedicine and Parasitology, 28:185-194.
A.A. LATIF1, T HOVE2, G.K. KANHAI3, S. MASAKA3 and R.G. PEGRAM4
1 Faculty of Science, Midrand University, PO. Box 2986, Halfway House, 1685 South Africa
2 University of Zimbabwe, PO. Box 167 MP, Harare, Zimbabwe
3 Veterinary Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 8101, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
4 Caribbean Amblyomma Control Programme, FAO Office, PO. Box 631-C, Bridgetown, Barbados
Accepted for publication 4 June 2001-Editor
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute Sep 2001
Abstract
Fifty-nine Hereford cattle susceptible to tick-borne diseases were used as tracer animals to assess the tick challenge and pathogenicity of Theileria parva under field conditions in Zimbabwe. They were moved periodically in groups of five to three commercial farms (one group consisted of four) during seasons of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus nymphal and adult activity. All tracer cattle were herded together with the farm cattle but were not dipped. The nymphal tick counts were high on two of the farms (up to 2000 per animal) but were very low on the third farm (less than ten per animal). On the three farms, 19 out of 24 (76%) tracers had patent Theileria schizonts. There was a range of clinical manifestations of theileriosis with acute and fatal infections occurring on one farm. The adult R. appendiculatus infestations during the wet season numbered 120-800 per animal on the three farms. The disease transmitted by the adults was very pathogenic on the three farms; 30 out of 35 (86%) had severe theileriosis infections. Cattle, which survived the nymphal diseases challenge, showed various degrees of immunity to subsequent T. parva challenge transmitted by adult ticks. Therefore, 13 out of 18 (72%) of these cattle had a second disease episode and the case fatality rate on the three farms was 46%. The factors which determined the epidemiological status of Theileria challenge on the farms, such as the farming systems and presence of wild animals, are discussed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer