It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
During active TB in humans a spectrum of pulmonary granulomas with central necrosis and hypoxia exists. BALB/c mice, predominantly used in TB drug development, do not reproduce this complex pathology thereby inaccurately predicting clinical outcome. We found that Nos2−/− mice incapable of NO-production in immune cells as microbial defence uniformly develop hypoxic necrotizing lung lesions, widely observed in human TB. To study the impact of hypoxic necrosis on the efficacy of antimycobacterials and drug candidates, we subjected Nos2−/− mice with TB to monotherapy before or after establishment of human-like pathology. Isoniazid induced a drug-tolerant persister population only when necrotic lesions were present. Rifapentine was more potent than rifampin prior to development of human-like pathology and equally potent thereafter, in agreement with recent clinical trials. Pretomanid, delamanid and the pre-clinical candidate BTZ043 were bactericidal independent of pulmonary pathology. Linezolid was bacteriostatic in TB-infected Nos2−/− mice but significantly improved lung pathology. Hypoxic necrotizing lesions rendered moxifloxacin less active. In conclusion, Nos2−/− mice are a predictive TB drug development tool owing to their consistent development of human-like pathology.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Department of Immunology, Berlin, Germany; Public Health Research Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA
2 Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Department of Immunology, Berlin, Germany; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
3 Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Department of Immunology, Berlin, Germany
4 Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Department of Immunology, Berlin, Germany; University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
5 Tuberculosis Research Section, Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA; Albany Molecular Research Inc, Singapore, Singapore
6 Global Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
7 A. N. Bakh Institute of Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
8 Tuberculosis Research Section, Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA; Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Republic of South Africa
9 Public Health Research Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA