It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In many parts of Africa, soil erosion is an important problem, which is evident from high sediment yields in tropical montane streams. Previous studies in Kenya pointed to a large contribution from catchments cultivated by smallholder farmers. This led to the hypothesis that unpaved tracks and gullies are the main sediment sources in smallholder agriculture catchments of the highlands of Kenya. The aim of this study was to investigate the sediment sources with sediment fingerprinting to generate the knowledge base to improve land management and to reduce sediment yields. Four main sediment sources (agricultural land, unpaved tracks, gullies and channel banks) and suspended sediments were analysed for biogeochemical elements as potential tracers. To apportion the catchments target sediment to different sources, we applied the MixSIAR un-mixing modelling under a Bayesian framework. Surprisingly, the fingerprinting analysis showed that agricultural land accounted for 75% (95% confidence interval 63–86%) of the total sediment. Channel banks contributed 21% (8–32%), while the smallest contributions to sediment were generated by the unpaved tracks and gullies with 3% (0–12%) and 1% (0–4%), respectively. Erosion management strategies should target agricultural lands with an emphasis on disconnecting unpaved tracks form hillslope source areas to reduce sediment yields to Lake Victoria.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK (GRID:grid.9835.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8190 6402); Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Nairobi, Kenya (GRID:grid.9835.7)
2 University of Basel, Department of Environmental Sciences, Basel, Switzerland (GRID:grid.6612.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0642)
3 Justus Liebig University Giessen, Centre for International Development and Environmental Research (ZEU), Giessen, Germany (GRID:grid.8664.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2165 8627)
4 Justus Liebig University Giessen, Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management (ILR), Giessen, Germany (GRID:grid.8664.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2165 8627); Justus Liebig University Giessen, Centre for International Development and Environmental Research (ZEU), Giessen, Germany (GRID:grid.8664.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2165 8627)
5 Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK (GRID:grid.9835.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8190 6402)