It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
While chemotherapy delivery by nanocarriers has modestly improved the survival prospects of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), additional engagement of the immune response could be game changing. We demonstrate a nano-enabled approach for accomplishing robust anti-PDAC immunity in syngeneic mice through the induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD) as well as interfering in the immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway. This is accomplished by conjugating the IDO inhibitor, indoximod (IND), to a phospholipid that allows prodrug self-assembly into nanovesicles or incorporation into a lipid bilayer that encapsulates mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNP). The porous MSNP interior allows contemporaneous delivery of the ICD-inducing chemotherapeutic agent, oxaliplatin (OX). The nanovesicles plus free OX or OX/IND-MSNP induce effective innate and adaptive anti-PDAC immunity when used in a vaccination approach, direct tumor injection or intravenous biodistribution to an orthotopic PDAC site. Significant tumor reduction or eradication is accomplishable by recruiting cytotoxic T lymphocytes, concomitant with downregulation of Foxp3+ T cells.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Division of NanoMedicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2 Division of NanoMedicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3 Division of NanoMedicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
4 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
5 Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
6 Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
7 Division of NanoMedicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA