It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Humans are one of the few species undergoing an adolescent growth spurt. Because children enter the spurt at different ages making age a poor maturity measure, longitudinal studies are necessary to identify the growth patterns and identify commonalities in adolescent growth. The standard maturity determinant, peak height velocity (PHV) timing, is difficult to estimate in individuals due to diurnal, postural, and measurement variation. Using prospective longitudinal populations of healthy children from two North American populations, we compared the timing of the adolescent growth spurt’s peak height velocity to normalized heights and hand skeletal maturity radiographs. We found that in healthy children, the adolescent growth spurt is standardized at 90% of final height with similar patterns for children of both sexes beginning at the initiation of the growth spurt. Once children enter the growth spurt, their growth pattern is consistent between children with peak growth at 90% of final height and skeletal maturity closely reflecting growth remaining. This ability to use 90% of final height as easily identified important maturity standard with its close relationship to skeletal maturity represents a significant advance allowing accurate prediction of future growth for individual children and accurate maturity comparisons for future studies of children’s growth.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
2 Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, California, USA
6 Department of Orthopedics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
7 Colon Rectal Specialists, Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
8 Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
9 Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA