Several errors occurred in the data within the third and fifth paragraphs of the section "Phylogeography", and the third and fourth paragraphs within "Linguistic isolates: Ladin and Grecani Salentini" under the Results section. Please see the corrected paragraphs, with updated haplogroup percentages below:
Phylogeography:
A total of 282 Y-chromosomes were analyzed for a set of Y-SNPs and were classified into 22 different haplogroups (Figure 3). Two haplogroups were not found, even though markers defining these clades were tested: N3 and R1a1. Five haplogroups represented 76.71% of the total chromosomes: R1b3, J2, I(xI1b2), E3b1 and G. The frequencies averaged across populations were 31%, 19%, 8.3%, 10.2% and 11.2%, respectively. The remaining haplogroups sum to 18.6% in the total sample, and never above 2.7% in single population samples.
Regional differences are substantially higher in the Y-chromosome than in the mtDNA. Thus, for instance, haplogroup R in the Y-chromosome was 53% in the North, 29.3% in the Center, and 30% in the South. Frequency differences were statistically significant between North vs Center (Pearson’s chi-square, unadjusted-P value = 0.0014), and North vs South (Pearson’s chi-square, unadjusted-P value < 0.00004). Haplogroup J2 also revealed important regional differences; it added to 9% in the North 29.3% in the Center, and 20.7% in the South, with statistically significant differences between the North vs Center (Pearson's chi-square, unadjusted-P value<0.00002), North vs South (Pearson's chi-square, unadjusted-P value<0.00148), and in the limit of significance Center vs South (Pearson's chi-square, unadjusted-P value<0.049).
Linguistic isolates: Ladin and Grecani Salentini:
The differences between Ladin and other populations were more evident when examining haplogroup frequency patterns (Figure 4). The frequency of haplogroup H (66%) was above the frequency of H in North Italy (55%), and was extremely high (66%) compared to the average for Italy (38%) (Pearson’s Chi-square test, P-value = 0.0005). While haplogroup U was found to have approximately the same frequency as other Italian populations, haplogroup T was 5% compared to 12% in Italy generally (7% in the North). Other differences were apparent, but sample sizes were relatively low to yield significant statistical differences.
Differences are more important when examining Y-chromosome haplogroup frequencies. R1b3 reached 53% in Ladin populations but only 31% in the general population, and also in the North (Pearson's Chi-square test, P-value = 0.0087); Figure 4. More remarkable are the differences when considering the remaining R1b lineages, that is, R1b(xR1b3), which account for 15% of the lineages in Ladins, but only for 2% in the general population (Pearson's Chi-square test, P-value = 0.0001). Other haplogroups showed substantial haplogroup differences (e.g. J2) but the sample size was again too small.
Figures 1 and 3 have been updated accordingly. Please view the corrected images below:
Figure 1:
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Figure 3:
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Figures
Citation: Brisighelli F, Álvarez-Iglesias V, Fondevila M, Blanco-Verea A, Carracedo Á, Pascali VL, et al. (2014) Correction: Uniparental Markers of Contemporary Italian Population Reveals Details on Its Pre-Roman Heritage. PLoS ONE 9(1): 10.1371/annotation/ea14adcb-033d-492d-8f8b-e047aa080cd4. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/ea14adcb-033d-492d-8f8b-e047aa080cd4
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2014 . This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Regional differences are substantially higher in the Y-chromosome than in the mtDNA. [...]haplogroup R in the Y-chromosome was 53% in the North, 29.3% in the Center, and 30% in the South. Haplogroup J2 also revealed important regional differences; it added to 9% in the North 29.3% in the Center, and 20.7% in the South, with statistically significant differences between the North vs Center (Pearson's chi-square, unadjusted-P value<0.00002), North vs South (Pearson's chi-square, unadjusted-P value<0.00148), and in the limit of significance Center vs South (Pearson's chi-square, unadjusted-P value<0.049). Other haplogroups showed substantial haplogroup differences (e.g. J2) but the sample size was again too small.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer