It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Cpf1 is a novel class of CRISPR-Cas DNA endonucleases, with a wide range of activity across different eukaryotic systems. Yet, the underlying determinants of this variability are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that LbCpf1, but not AsCpf1, ribonucleoprotein complexes allow efficient mutagenesis in zebrafish and Xenopus. We show that temperature modulates Cpf1 activity by controlling its ability to access genomic DNA. This effect is stronger on AsCpf1, explaining its lower efficiency in ectothermic organisms. We capitalize on this property to show that temporal control of the temperature allows post-translational modulation of Cpf1-mediated genome editing. Finally, we determine that LbCpf1 significantly increases homology-directed repair in zebrafish, improving current approaches for targeted DNA integration in the genome. Together, we provide a molecular understanding of Cpf1 activity in vivo and establish Cpf1 as an efficient and inducible genome engineering tool across ectothermic species.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
2 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
3 Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
4 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Innovative Genomics Initiative, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; MBIB Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
5 Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA