It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The widespread adoption of RAD-Seq data in phylogeography means genealogical relationships previously evaluated using relatively few genetic markers can now be addressed with thousands of loci. One challenge, however, is that RAD-Seq generates complete genotypes for only a small subset of loci or individuals. Simulations indicate that loci with missing data can produce biased estimates of key population genetic parameters, although the influence of such biases in empirical studies is not well understood. Here we compare microsatellite data (8 loci) and RAD-Seq data (six datasets ranging from 239 to 25,198 loci) from red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle) in Florida to evaluate how different levels of data filtering influence phylogeographic inferences. For all datasets, we calculated population genetic statistics and evaluated population structure, and for RAD-Seq datasets, we additionally examined population structure using coalescence. We found higher FST using microsatellites, but that RAD-Seq-based estimates approached those based on microsatellites as more loci with more missing data were included. Analyses of RAD-Seq datasets resolved the classic Gulf-Atlantic coastal phylogeographic break, which was not significant in the microsatellite analyses. Applying multiple levels of filtering to RAD-Seq datasets can provide a more complete picture of potential biases in the data and elucidate subtle phylogeographic patterns.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Chen, Shichao 2 ; Payton, Adam C 3 ; McDaniel, Stuart F 4 ; Soltis, Pamela 5
; Soltis, Douglas E 4 1 Department of Biology University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
2 Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; College of Life Sciences and Technology Tongji University, Shanghai, China
3 Department of Biology University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
4 Department of Biology University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; The Genetics Institute University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
5 Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; The Genetics Institute University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA




