It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) controlled prosthetic arms are being developed to restore function to people with upper-limb paralysis. This work provides an opportunity to analyze human cortical activity during complex tasks. Previously we observed that BCI control became more difficult during interactions with objects, although we did not quantify the neural origins of this phenomena. Here, we investigated how motor cortical activity changed in the presence of an object independently of the kinematics that were being generated using intracortical recordings from two people with tetraplegia. After identifying a population-wide increase in neural firing rates that corresponded with the hand being near an object, we developed an online scaling feature in the BCI system that operated without knowledge of the task. Online scaling increased the ability of two subjects to control the robotic arm when reaching to grasp and transport objects. This work suggests that neural representations of the environment, in this case the presence of an object, are strongly and consistently represented in motor cortex but can be accounted for to improve BCI performance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
2 School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
3 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
4 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
5 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
6 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA