It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Several viable but conflicting explanations have been proposed to explain the recent ~8 p.p.b. per year increase in atmospheric methane after 2006, equivalent to net emissions increase of ~25 Tg CH4 per year. A concurrent increase in atmospheric ethane implicates a fossil source; a concurrent decrease in the heavy isotope content of methane points toward a biogenic source, while other studies propose a decrease in the chemical sink (OH). Here we show that biomass burning emissions of methane decreased by 3.7 (±1.4) Tg CH4 per year from the 2001–2007 to the 2008–2014 time periods using satellite measurements of CO and CH4, nearly twice the decrease expected from prior estimates. After updating both the total and isotopic budgets for atmospheric methane with these revised biomass burning emissions (and assuming no change to the chemical sink), we find that fossil fuels contribute between 12–19 Tg CH4 per year to the recent atmospheric methane increase, thus reconciling the isotopic- and ethane-based results.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
2 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
4 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
5 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
6 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands