About the Authors:
Luciana Takada
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected] (LT); [email protected] (LGA)
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9444-8935
Marina M. D. Barbero
Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Henrique N. Oliveira
Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Gregório M. F. de Camargo
Roles Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Gerardo A. Fernandes Júnior
Roles Investigation
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Rusbel R. Aspilcueta-Borquis
Roles Formal analysis
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Fabio R. P. Souza
Roles Conceptualization, Methodology
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Arione A. Boligon
Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Thaise P. Melo
Roles Resources
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Inaê C. Regatieri
Roles Methodology
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Fabieli L. B. Feitosa
Roles Resources
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Larissa F. S. Fonseca
Roles Investigation
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Ana F. B. Magalhães
Roles Resources
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Raphael B. Costa
Roles Data curation
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Lucia G. Albuquerque
Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration
* E-mail: [email protected] (LT); [email protected] (LGA)
Affiliation: Departamento de Zootecnia—São Paulo State University—UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil
Introduction
Brazil currently has the largest commercial beef cattle herd in the world, with about 215.2 million heads, and is the world’s second-largest producer and the largest exporter of beef [1]. The analysis of beef cattle production systems shows that reproductive traits are of economic importance for profitability. In a study on Nellore cattle in Brazil, Brumatti et al., [2] concluded that reproductive traits (sexual precocity and stayability in the herd) are 4 to 13 times more important than carcass and growth traits. Pravia et al., [3] reported a three times greater importance of reproductive traits compared to traits related to growth and feed intake in a production system of Hereford cattle in Uruguay. The authors therefore recommend reproductive traits to be a selection objective for producers that wish to increase the profitability of their herds.
Sexual precocity and longevity of females in the herd show a high and positive genetic correlation [4, 5, 6], indicating that selection for more precocious animals concomitantly selects for animals that remain cycling in the herd for a longer period. The cost of fixed capital formation of the dam is thus diluted since the animal remains in the herd for a larger number of productive cycles. This is also observed phenotypically since precocious heifers are more likely to stay in the herd than non-precocious heifers [7].
The use of quantitative and molecular genetics permits the identification and validation of SNPs that influence phenotypes, as well as their subsequent utilization as markers to select traits of interest [8]. Using SNPs located close to genetic markers previously associated with reproductive traits, Cochran et al., [9] found 40 SNPs associated with pregnancy rate (p<0.05), with the genes being related to the endocrine system, cell signaling, immune system, and inhibition of apoptosis. The knowledge of genes that influence reproductive traits in Nellore cattle, as well as of the contribution of each gene, is important for understanding the biological mechanism that influences the expression of a phenotype and for future genetic evaluation.
Although the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and related genes are important for the onset of puberty, it is unlikely that puberty can be explained by only a small number of genes associated with a single trait. After all, puberty is a complex phenotype that is influenced by many other processes, including those involved in energy balance and brain development [10]. Therefore, the general objective of this study was to detect polymorphisms associated with sexual precocity in Nellore heifers using a method that combines the pre-selection of candidate genes (genes related to folliculogenesis and gonads, follicular maturation, hypothalamus, pituitary, pregnancy, and puberty) and the reconstruction of haplotypes.
Material and methods
Animals and sample collection
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation (CEUA) of the School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV/UNESP) Jaboticabal—São Paulo Brazil (protocol nº17958/15).
Data from 1,689 precocious and non-precocious Nellore heifers were available for breeding with sires at about 16 months of age in herds participating in the Conexão Delta G breeding program were used. All heifers of these herds are mated for the first time at an age close to 16 months, irrespective of weight and body conditions, and continue in the breeding season for about 3 months. During this period, heifers are subjected to multiple-sire natural mating, with a sire-cow ratio of 1:50. Approximately 60 days after the end of the breeding season pregnancy of the heifers is confirmed by rectal palpation. In the herds studied, 25.82% of the heifers became pregnant in this first breeding season.
The biological material was collected in previous performed studies by Costa et al. [11] and Irano et al. [12]. Hair follicles were collected from the brush of the tails (about 100 follicles/animal) during the breeding season of the heifers, and were stored in envelopes identified with the number of the animal, year of birth and breeding season. The follicles were carefully stored at 4°C until the time of DNA extraction.
DNA extraction and quantification
About 40 hair follicles/animal were used. The follicles were cut with clean flame-sterilized scissors so that only the bulbs remained in the 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes. DNA was extracted from these hair follicles using the NucleoSpin Tissue Kit (Macherey-Nagel®) according to manufacturer instructions. A Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific, USA, 2008) was used to verify the quantity and quality of the extracted DNA. The DNA extracted from the hair follicles was of great quality, its concentration was higher than 100 ng/μL in 97% of, and the samples the 260:280 ratio ranged from 1.8 to 2.0, allowing use of a good material for the genotyping.
Candidate genes
The candidate genes included 125 genes encoding proteins that are somehow related to age at first calving. All genes were chosen based on studies indicating their participation in folliculogenesis and gonad development (ACVR, STAR, HSD17B3), oocyte maturation (BMP15, GDF9) [9], hypothalamus and Central nervous system (GnRH, GPR 54, KISS-1, XKR4), pituitary (ACTH, PRL, LHR, FSHR) or pregnancy (IFN-τ, MBL-1, PAPPA-A, PAPPA2), or are genes that have been associated with puberty in previous studies (PPARG, ESRRG, PROP1) [10]. The complete list of the candidate genes is shown in “S1 Table”.
SNP panel and genotyping
For the study of candidate genes, SNPs of the panel of 777,000 SNPs of the Illumina High-Density Bovine BeadChip located within or close to these genes were analyzed. The SNPs were chosen based on the position of the gene in the genome (GenBank) and the position of the SNP in the Illumina panel. All SNPs located up to 5 kilobases (kb) from the proposed genes were selected. This chip offers uniform coverage across the genome of taurine breeds, with an average spacing between markers of 5 kb, in addition to a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.25 (Illumina® SNP Genotyping).
Genotyping was performed following to the Infinium ® II Assay Multi-Sample protocol in a HiScan™ SQ System (Illumina). A total of 1.689 precocious and non-precocious heifers were genotyped. The GenomeStudio® program was applied to ensure the quality of the samples and remove samples with a call rate less than 90%. Based on this criterion 20 samples were excluded. SNPs that exhibited significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p<0.00001), which indicates genotyping errors, were removed. SNPs with an MAF < 0.01 and a call frequency < 0.9 were also eliminated. To generate the files with the information of each SNP for each animal, the same program was used according to the Illumina "TOP / BOT" designation.
Haplotype reconstruction
After selection of the SNPs within the region of the candidate genes, the fastPHASE® program [13] was used for reconstruction of the haplotypes. The results were entered into the Haploview v4.1 program [14] to estimate the linkage disequilibrium between SNP pairs based on r2 statistics [15] and to obtain the allele patterns formed by each haplotype. SNPs that were not part of any haplotype were considered isolated markers.
Statistical analysis
The trait evaluated was early heifer pregnancy. This is considered a binary trait in which value 1 is attributed to heifers with a positive diagnosis of pregnancy at 16 months and value 0 to those with a negative diagnosis. Although the trait has a binary distribution, linear models were used for this analysis because of their easier execution and interpretation of the results. Thus, the association with the trait of interest was verified using a linear mixed model, for each isolated or haplotype SNP.
It was used for all markers, the model included the contemporary group as fixed effect and the parent of the animal (sire effect) as random effect. The contemporary group was defined by concatenation of farm, year and month of birth of the animal. An identification code of the father (ghost sires) was generated for each animal with unknown sire to allow analysis with the software chosen.
To define the blocks of SNPs that form the haplotypes, was using the algorithm of Gabriel et al. [16], which considers the confidence interval D ', statistical implemented in Haploview software. Regarding the analysis of isolated SNPs, the copy number of the most frequent allele present in the genotype of the animal was included as a covariate. Where it was possible to detect the presence of haplotypes in the segments, the analyses were performed considering the block of haplotype-forming SNPs. In addition, in the latter case variables containing the copy number of each allele detected in the population, except for the least occurrence, were included as covariates. The model used can be written as:where yijk is the observed value of the trait studied for animal k of sire j in contemporary group i; CGi is the fixed effect of contemporary group i; sj is the random effect of sire j; bl is the regression coefficient of the copy number of allele l on the trait studied; xijkl is the copy number of allele l in the animal; eijk is the random error, and n is the number of alleles for the marker analyzed.
The Mixed Procedure of the SAS® statistical package was used in all analyzes. The Bonferroni method correction for multiple comparisons was applied to ensure maintenance of the error rate of the statistical tests. For each polymorphism, the allele and genotype frequencies were calculated according to [17].
Results
It ranged from 0 to 199 the number of SNPs of the High DensityBovine SNP BeadChip found within each region of the candidate genes (“S1 Table”). No SNPs were detected for 11 of the candidate genes, which could therefore not be analyzed. Thus, the remaining 114 candidate genes and haplotype blocks were assembled and evaluated regarding their effects on early pregnancy. The haplotype blocks were formed by 2 to 20 SNPs.
S2 Table. The S2 Table shows the location of significant haplotypes and the position of the SNPs in the PAPP-A2, PAPP-A, MBL-1, ESRRG and XKR4 genes.
For analysis 2024 SNPs were used. Statistical analysis of the 114 genes revealed a significant effect (p<0.05) of the nine haplotype blocks located in the PAPP-A2, PAPP-A, MBL-1, ESRRG and XKR4 genes on early heifer pregnancy. In the PAPPA-A2 gene, four haplotypes formed by 20, 18, 5 and 5 SNPs exerted significant effects (p<0.05) (Table 1). One haplotype with 2 SNPs was found in the PAPPA-A gene (Table 2), one haplotype with 4 SNPs in the XKR4 gene (Table 3), one haplotype with 2 SNPs in the MBL-1 gene (Table 4), and two haplotypes with 8 and 3 SNPs in the ESRRG gene (Table 5).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 1. Frequency, average effect, and respective standard error of haplotypes alleles located in the PAPP-A2 gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.t001
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 2. Frequency, average effect, and respective standard error of haplotype alleles located in the PAPP-A gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.t002
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 3. Frequency, average effect, and respective standard error of haplotype alleles located in the XKR4 gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.t003
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 4. Frequency, average effect, and respective standard error of the haplotype alleles located in the MBL-1 gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.t004
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 5. Frequency, average effect, and respective standard error of the haplotype alleles located in the ESRRG gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.t005
Discussion
The present results showed that the pre-selection of candidate genes and association analysis of SNPs that occur within these genes are efficient in identifying markers for sexual precocity in Nellore heifers.
The ESRRG (Estrogen-Related Receptor Gamma) gene was associated with sexual precocity in Nellore heifers. Members of the ESRR family (ESRRα, ESRRβ and ESRRγ) are orphan nuclear receptors and were identified based on their homology with estrogen receptors. Despite this similarity, ESRRs are not activated by estrogen [18]. ESRRG targets a variety of receptors such as follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), GABA receptor (GABRA1) and glutamate receptor (NMDAR2B) etc. Through the ESRRG the FSHR may influence the feedback of estrogen on FSH release. The fact that ESRRG regulates GABRA1 and NMDAR2B indicates a link between estrogen pathways and GABA and glutamate signaling, which might influence puberty by activating the pulsatile secretion of GnRH [10]. Our findings corroborate the results of Fortes et al. [19] who performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to investigate the association between different genes and puberty in beef heifers. Puberty was defined as the age of occurrence of the first corpus luteum (AGECL). The authors observed a pleiotropic effect of the ESRRG gene in analyses of the gene network that considers AGECL as the main trait. Other studies conducted by the same group also associated the ESRRG gene with puberty in beef heifers [10] and [19].
Among reproductive tissues, studies have shown that the human placenta expresses large amounts of ESRRG [20, 18]. ESRRG participates in the formation of the syncytium and its expression increases during trophoblast differentiation. Since trophoblastic cells are essential for implantation of the embryo and development of the placenta during pregnancy in humans, mitochondrial biogenesis and the expression of some target genes of placental energy metabolism were found to be reduced when the expression of ESRRG was compromised [18]. The effect of the ESRRG gene on early heifer pregnancy identified in the present study may be due to its important role in metabolism and placental formation at the beginning of pregnancy.
Another pathway whereby ESRRG might interfere with early heifer pregnancy is through its action on lipid homeostasis and oxidative energy metabolism [21]. Functional genome studies have shown that ESRRs play an important role in the regulation of genes that encode components involved in pathways of fatty acid and glucose metabolism [22, 23, 18]. The relationship of a gene involved in lipid metabolism with a reproductive trait is the result of the fact that cycling females need to reach a certain body condition score, which is given in the final stage by the accumulation of fat, i.e., females are not reproductively active if they do not accumulate energy. A minimum body condition (i.e., total body fat) is therefore necessary for successful puberty. This is achieved when heifers reach 65% of the body weight of an adult cow to conceive at the beginning of the breeding season [24]. According to Semmelmann et al. [25], Nellore heifers that conceived after sexual maturation at 16 to 18 months of age were heavier and had a better body condition.
Two other genes that also exerted a significant effect (p<0.05) on sexual precocity in Nellore heifers were PAPP-A (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A) and PAPP-A2 (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A2), which are metalloproteinases. These genes are located on chromosomes 8 and 16 and regulate the local bioavailability of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) in different systems including the placenta, ovarian follicles and bones and in pathological conditions such as skin wounds and atherosclerotic plaques [26]. PAPP-A2 is a PAPP-A homolog that shares 46% sequence identity with the latter. This protein is a protease that specifically cleaves IGF-binding protein 5 (IGFBP-5) independent of IGF-1 [27] resulting in increased bioavailability of IGF, with significant consequences for the development of the fetus and the health of the mother [28].
In Holstein cows, a QTL influencing calving ease was detected on BTA16 in a region encompassing the PAPP-A2 gene [29]. SNPs in these genes have also been associated with fertility traits, milk production and reproductive health in Holstein cattle [30]. Luna-Nevarez et al. [31] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172330 - pone.0172330.ref002] associated SNPs in the PAPP-A2 gene with reproductive traits in beef heifers and indicated this gene as a potential candidate for fertility in cattle, a fact that would explain the influence of the gene on sexual precocity in Nellore heifers.
In cattle PAPP-A cleaves both IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 in the presence of IGF-1. In the female reproductive system, PAPP-A is involved in the development of the ovarian follicle [32] and in the implantation of the embryo [33], a reduction in the expression of the PAPP-A gene is associated with the development of cysts in the ovary [34].
Furthermore, studies investigating bovine ovarian follicles demonstrated a strong association between IGF-1 concentrations and estradiol in follicular fluid and the capacity of these follicles to reach the preovulatory stage [35, 36]. PAPP-A may play a role in ovarian follicles, participating especially in oocyte maturation, irrespective of the cleavage of IGFBP-4. FSH was found to stimulate the expression of the IGFR-1 and PAPP-A genes in granulosa cells, suggesting that the PAPP-A mRNA expression in granulosa cells may contribute to the production of free IGF-I and increase LH receptors to trigger the preovulatory phase and consequently lead to ovulation [37, 38]. Finally, it is possible that PAPP-A participates in ovulation through the cleavage of critical substrates [39, 38]. According to Fortune et al. [40], the FSH-induced increase in PAPP-A is the earliest change detected in the future dominant follicle. This would explain the role of PAPP-A in sexual precocity since this gene is involved in ovulation and puberty. From a hormone point of view, puberty is defined as the first sign of estrous behavior associated with a potentially fertile ovulation, followed by a corpus luteum of normal duration [41].
Taken together, all of these reports show a strong association of sexual precocity with the PAPP-A and PAPP-A2 genes via IGF-1. Although no significant effect of the IGF-1 gene was observed in the present study, this gene plays a key role in the determination of age at puberty. This is the fact that IGF-1 acts in the follicles promoting an increase in estradiol production, thus increasing steroidogenesis [42] and IGF-I encourage puberty by acting on the central nervous system (mean eminence), leading to an increase in the release of GnRH, which would stimulate the increase in the frequency of LH pulses [43, 44].
A significant difference in sexual precocity of heifers was observed for the XKR4 gene (XK, Kell blood group complex subunit-related family, member 4). This gene is expressed preferentially in the cerebellum [45, 46]. The amino acid sequence of the XKR4 gene has important biological functions in cell and lipid metabolism [47]. Utsunomiya et al. [48] performed GWAS to identify chromosome regions that affect birth weight in Nellore cattle. The authors found a significant SNP (rs42646720) in intron 2 of the XKR4 gene and reported its association with birth weight and size in Zebu breeds (Bos primigenius indicus).
Lindholm-Perry et al. [47] identified five SNPs located between the TMEM68 and XKR4 genes that were significant for residual feed intake and average daily gain in crossbred steers. Bolormaa et al. [49] found five SNPs in a region of BTA14 encompassing XKR4 that were associated with rump fat thickness at position P8 (CHILLP8) in seven cattle breeds. In another study investigating the XKR4 gene in cattle, three SNPs associated with rump fat thickness were detected within the gene [50]. The XKR4 gene has been described as a potential candidate gene associated with residual feed intake, average daily feed intake, average daily gain and fat accumulation. This would explain its relationship with sexual precocity since the onset of puberty and sexual maturity in female cattle is influenced, among many factors, by the rate of weight gain and body condition [51].
The mannose-binding lectin (MBL) gene also influenced sexual precocity in Nellore heifers. This lectin is found in human serum, is secreted by the liver, and binds carbohydrates in a calcium-dependent manner. MBL is an important element of the innate immune system that is involved in the activation of the complement system via lectins and functions as an opsonin, facilitating the phagocytosis of pathogens. Serum MBL deficiency is associated with infectious and autoimmune diseases, interfering with both the susceptibility to and severity of the disease [52, 53, 54].
Serum concentrations of MBL increase significantly from the first trimester of gestation and decrease 6 weeks after delivery. MBL contributes to normal placentation during an ongoing pregnancy. The reasons for increased MBL levels during pregnancy are unknown. It has been suggested that adaptive immunity decreases during pregnancy, which allows the pregnant body to tolerate the fetus as an allograft [55, 56].
Low MBL concentrations have been associated with spontaneous abortions [57], suggesting that an altered immune response in the fetal environment is responsible for the increased susceptibility to abortion. This could explain the function of this gene in sexual precocity. Precocious heifers would have a more competent immune system and are consequently more likely to conceive early and to carry the pregnancy to term since a successful pregnancy depends on the tolerance of the maternal immune system to a new organism with its own characteristics that differ from those of the mother. If this immune adaptation does not occur, the embryo is destroyed and expelled [58, 59].
Cochran et al. [9] studied genes associated with reproductive and other traits and found seven genes with SNPs associated with pregnancy rate that are involved in immune function. Hansen et al. [60] emphasized the importance of the immune system for the establishment of pregnancy in mammals.
Another function of MBL-1 is related to lipid metabolism in humans. Rakhshandehroo et al. [61] concluded that the PPARα stimulates plasma levels and gene expression of MBL in hepatocytes, suggesting a possible role of MBL in lipid metabolism. This finding could explain the influence of the MBL gene on sexual precocity. In Nellore heifers, Dias et al. [62] observed that the onset of puberty was influenced by two genes related to lipid metabolism. Some factors such as age and body fat reserves can affect the onset of the estrous cycle. The increase in body fat deposition reduces the negative feedback caused by estrogens on GnRH and LH pulsatility, with adequate energy intake being the main nutritional factor that affects the reproductive performance of cows [63]. Heifers with a positive diagnosis of pregnancy at 13–15 months of age are heavier and older and have a better body condition than non-pregnant heifers [64].
It should be noted that the ESRRG and XKR4 genes can also influence lipid metabolism as reported earlier, demonstrating the importance of these genes for sexual precocity in Nellore heifers since genes that affect fat deposition and, consequently, body condition play an important role in Zebu breeding.
Conclusion
The PAPP-A2, PAPP-A, ESRRG, MBL-1 and XKR4 genes, which participate in specific events in target tissues of cattle reproduction (hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, adipose tissue and immune system), were associated with sexual precocity in Nellore heifers and could help identify the main physiological factors that contribute to expression of the phenotype. In addition, these genes are candidates for prospecting causal mutations in future studies and are potential genes to be included in genetic evaluations.
Supporting information
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
S1 File. File with results from the first part of the statistical analyzes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.s001
(ZIP)
S2 File. Files with results from the second part of the statistical analyzes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.s002
(XLS)
S3 File. File with the genotypes of all animals used in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.s003
(RAR)
S1 Table. List of candidate genes, description, chromosome and number of SNPs found in each gene.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.s004
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Haplotype location and position of the chromosomes and SNPs of genes with a significant effect at p<0.05.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197.s005
(DOCX)
Citation: Takada L, Barbero MMD, Oliveira HN, de Camargo GMF, Fernandes Júnior GA, Aspilcueta-Borquis RR, et al. (2018) Genomic association for sexual precocity in beef heifers using pre-selection of genes and haplotype reconstruction. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0190197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190197
1. IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (http://saladeimprensa.ibge.gov.br).
2. Brumatti RC, Ferraz RC, Eler JP. Desenvolvimento de índices de seleção em gado de corte sob enfoque de um modelo bioeconômico. Arch Zootec. 2011;60: 205–213.
3. Pravia MI, Ravagnolo O, Urioste JI, Garrick DJ. Identification of breeding objectives using a bioeconomic model for a beef cattle production system in Uruguay. Livest Sci. 2014;160: 21–28.
4. Buzanskas ME, Grossi DA, Ventura RV, Schenkel FS, Sargolzaei M, Meirelles SLC, et al. Genetic associations between stayability and reproductive and growth traits in Canchim beef cattle. Livest Sci. 2010;132: 107–112.
5. Santana ML, Eler JP, Ferraz JBS, Mattos EC. Genetic relationship between growth and reproductive traits in Nellore cattle. Animal. 2012;6(4): 565–570. pmid:22436271
6. Van Melis MH, Eler JP, Rosa GJM, Ferraz JBS, Figueiredo LGG, Mattos EC, et al. Additive genetic relationships between scrotal circumference, heifer pregnancy, and stayability in Nellore cattle. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(12): 3809–3813. pmid:20656970
7. Terakado APN, Pereira MC, Yokoo MJ, Albuquerque LG. Evaluation of productivity of sexually precocious Nelore heifers. Animal. 2015;9(6): 938–943. pmid:25684276
8. Day ML, Nogueira GP. Management of age at puberty in beef heifers to optimize efficiency of beef production. Anim Front. 2013;3: 6–11.
9. Cochran SD, Cole JB, Null DJ, Hansen PJ. Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes associated with fertility and production traits in Holstein cattle. BMC Genet. 2013;14: 49. pmid:23759029
10. Fortes MRS, Reverter A, Zhang Y, Collis E, Nagaraj SH, Jonsson NN, et al. Association weight matrix for the genetic dissection of puberty in beef cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U.S.A. 2010; 107: 13642–13647. pmid:20643938
11. Irano N, de Camargo GMF, Costa RB, Terakado APN, Magalhães AFB, SILVA RMO, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study for Indicator Traits of Sexual Precocity in Nellore Cattle. Plos One. 2016;11(8): e0159502. pmid:27494397
12. Costa RB, Camargo GMF, Diaz IDPS, Irano N, Dias MM, Carvalheiro R, et al. Genome-wide association study of reproductive traits in Nellore heifers using Bayesian inference. Genet Sel Evol. 2015; 47: 67. pmid:26286463
13. Scheet P, Stephens MA. Fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78: 629–644. pmid:16532393
14. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21: 263–265. pmid:15297300
15. Hill WG, Robertson A. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet. 1968;38(6): 226–231. pmid:24442307
16. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002;296: 2225–2229. pmid:12029063
17. Weir BS. Genetic Data Analysis II: Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data. Sinauer Association, Sunderland.1996.
18. Poidatz D, Dos Santos E, Brule´ A, DE Mazancourt P, Dieudonne´ MN. Estrogen-related receptor gamma modulates energy metabolism target genes in human trophoblast. Placenta. 2012;33: 688–695. pmid:22763271
19. Fortes MRS, Reverter A, Nagaraj SH, Zhang Y, Jonsson NN, Barris W, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism-derived regulatory gene network underlying puberty in 2 tropical breeds of beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2011;89(6): 1669–1683. pmid:21357453
20. Takeda Y, Liu X, Sumiyoshi M, Matsushima A, Shimohigashi M, Shimohigashi Y. Placenta expressing the greatest quantity of bisphenol A receptor ERR{gamma} among the human reproductive tissues: predominant expression of type-1 ERRgamma isoform. J Biochem. 2009;146(1): 113–122. pmid:19304792
21. Benaitreau D, Dieudonne MN, Dos Santos E, Leneveu MC, Mazancourt P, Pecquery R. Antiproliferative effects of adiponectin on human trophoblastic cell lines JEG-3 and BeWo. Biol Reprod. 2009;80(6): 1107–1114. pmid:19246322
22. Giguere V. Transcriptional control of energy homeostasis by the estrogen-related receptors. Endocr Rev. 2008;29(6): 677–696. pmid:18664618
23. Kubo M, Ijichi N, Ikeda K, Horie-Inoue K, Takeda S, Inoue S. Modulation of adipogenesis-related gene expression by estrogen-related receptor gamma during adipocytic differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1789(2): 71–77. pmid:18809516
24. Perry GA. Physiology and endocrinology symposium: Harnessing basic knowledge of factors controlling puberty to improve synchronization of estrus and fertility in heifers. J Anim Sci. 2012;90: 1172–1182. 26. pmid:22003230
25. Semmelmann CEN, Lobato JFP, Rocha MG. Efeito de sistemas de alimentação no ganho de peso e desempenho reprodutivo de novilhas Nelore acasaladas aos 17–18 meses. Rev Bras Zootec. 2001;30: 835–843.
26. Conover CA, Bale LK, Overgaard MT, Johnstone EW, Laursen UH, Füchtbauer et al. Metalloproteinase pregnancy-associated plasma protein A is a critical growth regulatory factor during fetal development. Development. 2004;131: 1187–1194 pmid:14973274
27. Overgaard MT, Boldt HB, Laursen LS, Sottrup-Jensen L, Conover Ca, Oxvig C. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2 (PAPP-A2), a novel insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 proteinase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276: 21849–21853. pmid:11264294
28. Yan X, Baxter RC, Firth SM. Involvement of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2 in insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5 proteolysis during pregnancy: A potential mechanism for increasing IGF bioavailability. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95: 1412–1420. pmid:20103653
29. Schnabel RD, Sonstegard TS, Taylor JF, Ashwell MS. Whole-genome scan to detect QTL for milk production, conformation, fertility and functional traits in two US Holstein families. Anim Genet. 2005;36: 408–416. pmid:16167984
30. Wickramasinghe S, Rincon G, Medrano JF. Variants in the pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2 gene on Bos taurus autosome 16 are associated with daughter calving ease and productive life in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(3): 1552–1558. pmid:21338820
31. Luna-Nevarez P, Rincon G, Medrano JF, Riley DG, Chase JRCC, Coleman SW, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor axis in straightbred and crossbred Angus, Brahman, and Romosinuano heifers: Population genetic analyses and association of genotypes with reproductive phenotypes. J Anim Sci. 2011;89: 926–934. pmid:21183713
32. Conover CA, Faessen GF, Ilg KE, Chandrasekher YA, Christiansen M, Overgaard et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-a is the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 protease secreted by human ovarian granulosa cells and is a marker of dominant follicle selection and the corpus luteum. Endocrinology. 2001;142(5): 2155. pmid:11316785
33. Giudice LC, Conover CA, Bale L, Faessen GH, Ilg K, Sun I, et al. Identification and regulation of the IGFBP-4 protease and its physiological inhibitor in human trophoblasts and endometrial stroma: evidence for paracrine regulation of IGF-II bioavailability in the placental bed during human implantation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87: 2359–2366. pmid:11994388
34. Rodriguez FM, Colombero M, Amweg AN, Huber E, Gareis NC, Salvetti NR, et al. Involvement of PAPP-A and IGFR1 in Cystic Ovarian Disease in Cattle. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50(4): 659–68. pmid:26031184
35. Beg M, Bergfelt DR, Kot K, Ginther OJ. Follicle selection in cattle: dynamics of follicular fluid factors during development of follicle dominance. Biol Reprod. 2002;66: 120–126. pmid:11751273
36. Satrapa RA, Castilho AS, Razza EM, Pegorer MF, Puelker R, Barros CM. Differential expression of members of the IGF system in OPU-derived oocytes from Nelore (Bos indicus) and Holstein (Bos taurus) cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2013;138: 155–158. pmid:23540623
37. Monget P, Mazerbourg S, Delpuech T, Maurel M-C, Mani_Ere S, Zapf J, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein- A is involved in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) proteolytic degradation in bovine and porcine preovulatory follicles: identification of cleavage site and characterization of IGFBP-2 degradation. Biol Reprod. 2003;68: 77–86. pmid:12493698
38. Mazerbourg S, Overgaard MT, Oxvig C, Christiansen M, Conover CA, Laurendeau I, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in ovine, bovine, porcine and equine ovarian follicles: involvement in IGFBP-4 proteolytic degradation and mRNA expression during follicular development. Endocrinology. 2001;142: 5243–53. pmid:11713222
39. Smith MF, McIntush EW, Ricke WA, Kojima FN, Smith GW. Regulation of ovarian extracellular matrix remodelling by metalloproteases and their tissue inhibitors: effects on follicular development, ovulation and luteal function. J Reprod Fertil. 1999;54(Suppl): 367–81.
40. Fortune JE, Rivera GM, Yang MY. Follicular development: the role of the follicular microenvironment in selection of the dominant follicle. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82–83: 109–126. pmid:15271447
41. Kinder JE, Day ML, Kittok RJ. Endocrine regulation of puberty in cows and ewes. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1987;34: 167–186. pmid:3305916
42. Yelich JV, Wettemann RP, Marston TT, Spicer LJ. Luteinizing Hormone, Growth Hormone, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-l, Insulin and metabolites before puberty in heifers fed to gain at two rates. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 1996;13(4): 325–338. pmid:8839626
43. Emerick LL, Dias JC, Gonçalves PEM, Martins JAM, Leite TG, Andrade VJ, et al., Aspectos relevantes sobre a puberdade em fêmeas. Rev Bras Reprod Anim. 2009;33(1): 11–19.
44. Almeida O, Pinho RO, Lima DMA, Martins LF. Endocrinologia da puberdade em fêmeas bovinas Rev Cient Elet Med Vet. 2013;20(1): 1–13.
45. Lantieri F, Glessner JT, Hakonarson H, Elia J, Devoto M. Analysis of GWAS top hits in ADHD suggests association to two polymorphisms located in genes expressed in the cerebellum. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Psychiatr Genet. 2010;153B: 1127–1133.
46. Neale B.M, Lasky-SU J, Anney R, Franke B, Zhou K, Maller JB et al., Genome-wide association scan of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Med Genet. 2008;B147B: 1337–1344.
47. Lindholm-Perry AK, Kuehn LA, Smith TP, Ferrell CL, Jenkins TG, Freetly HC, et al. A region on BTA14 that includes the positional candidate genes LYPLA1, XKR4 AND TMEM68 is associated with feed intake and growth phenotypes in cattle. Anim Genet. 2012;43: 216–9. pmid:22404358
48. Utsunomiya YT, Carmo AS, Carvalheiro R, Neves HH, Matos MC, Zavarez LB. Genome-wide association study for birth weight in Nellore cattle points to previously described orthologous genes affecting human and bovine height. BMC Genet. 2013;14: 52. pmid:23758625
49. Bolormaa S, Porto Neto LR, Zhang YD, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Goddard ME, et al. A genome-wide association study of meat and carcass traits in Australian cattle. J Anim Sci. 2011;89(8): 2297–309. pmid:21421834
50. Porto Neto LR, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Barendse W. Variation in the XKR4 gene was significantly associated with subcutaneous rump fat thickness in indicine and composite cattle. An Genet. 2012;43: 785–9.
51. Monteiro FM, Mercadante MEZ, Barros CM, Satrapa RA, Silva JAV, Oliveira LZ, et al. Reproductive tract development and puberty in two lines of Nellore heifers selected for postweaning weight. Theriogenology. 2013;80: 10–17. pmid:23623163
52. Garred P, Larsen F, Seyfarth J, Fujita R, Madsen HO. Mannose-binding lectin and its genetic variants. Genes Immun. 2006;7: 85–94. pmid:16395391
53. Pinzon RP, Zanin SMW, Miguel MD, Klassen G, Barreira SMW. Lectina ligadora da manose: propriedades, isolamento e purificação. Visão Acadêmica. 2008; 9: 2.
54. Sharma P, Gupta B, Farhat Basir S, Rani Das H, Nahar P. Rapid and sensitive detection of autoantibody in rheumatoid arthritis patients by heat-mediated ELISA. Clin Biochem. 2008;41(1/2): 97–102.
55. Beagley KW, Gockel CM. Regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by the female sex hormones oestradiol and progesterone. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38(1): 13–22. pmid:12900050
56. Evan De Geijn FE, Roos A, De Man YA, LAMAN JD, De Groot CJM, Daha MR, et al. Mannose-binding lectin levels during pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(2): 362–371. pmid:17099209
57. Christiansen OB, Kilpatrick DC, Souter V, Varming K, Thiel S, Jensenius JC. Mannan-binding lectin deficiency is associates whit unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Scandinavian. J Immunol. 1999;49: 193–196.
58. Coulam CB. Understanding the immunobiology of pregnancy and applying it to treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss. Early Pregnancy. 2000;4: 19–29. pmid:11719819
59. Zac RI, Machado VMM, Alberti LR, Petroianu A. Associação entre alergia prévia, infertilidade e abortamento Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2005;51(3): 177–80. pmid:16007305
60. Hansen PJ. The Immunology of Early Pregnancy in Farm Animals Reprod Dom Anim. 2011;46(3): 18–30.
61. Rakhshandehroo M, Stienstra R, De Wit NJ, Bragt MC, Haluzik M, Mensink RP, et al. Plasma mannose-binding lectin is stimulated by PPARα in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;302: 5.
62. Dias MM, Souza FRP, Takada L, Feitosa FLB, Costa RB, Diaz IDPS, et al. Study of lipid metabolism-related genes as candidate genes of sexual precocity in Nellore cattle. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(1): 234–243. pmid:25729955
63. Gasser CL, Bridges GA, Mussard ML, Grum DE, Kinder JE. and Day ML. Induction of precocious puberty in heifers III: Hastened reduction of estradiol negative feedback on secretion of luteinizing hormone. J Anim Sci. 2006;84: 2050–2056. pmid:16864864
64. Vaz RZ, Lobato JFP. Efeito da idade de desmame no desempenho reprodutivo de novilhas de corte expostas à reprodução aos 13/15 meses de idade. Rev Bras Zootec. 2010;39(1): 142–150.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Reproductive traits are of the utmost importance for any livestock farming, but are difficult to measure and to interpret since they are influenced by various factors. The objective of this study was to detect associations between known polymorphisms in candidate genes related to sexual precocity in Nellore heifers, which could be used in breeding programs. Records of 1,689 precocious and non-precocious heifers from farms participating in the Conexão Delta G breeding program were analyzed. A subset of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) located in the region of the candidate genes at a distance of up to 5 kb from the boundaries of each gene, were selected from the panel of 777,000 SNPs of the High-Density Bovine SNP BeadChip. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis of early heifer pregnancy, relating the trait with isolated SNPs or with haplotype groups. The model included the contemporary group (year and month of birth) as fixed effect and parent of the animal (sire effect) as random effect. The fastPHASE® and GenomeStudio® were used for reconstruction of the haplotypes and for analysis of linkage disequilibrium based on r2 statistics. A total of 125 candidate genes and 2,024 SNPs forming haplotypes were analyzed. Statistical analysis after Bonferroni correction showed that nine haplotypes exerted a significant effect (p<0.05) on sexual precocity. Four of these haplotypes were located in the Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2 gene (PAPP-A2), two in the Estrogen-related receptor gamma gene (ESRRG), and one each in the Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A gene (PAPP-A), Kell blood group complex subunit-related family (XKR4) and mannose-binding lectin genes (MBL-1) genes. Although the present results indicate that the PAPP-A2, PAPP-A, XKR4, MBL-1 and ESRRG genes influence sexual precocity in Nellore heifers, further studies are needed to evaluate their possible use in breeding programs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer