It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The study aims to develop and assess and validate a brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist among diabetic patients through a longitudinal study. Patients who had diabetes mellitus and had no foot ulceration and severe systematic disorders were recruited from eleven tertiary hospitals in nine provinces or municipalities of China. Internal consistency reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, item property, and measurement invariance of the tool were assessed. The predictive capability of the tool was validated by the follow-up data using the receiver operating characteristic curve. At baseline, 477 valid cases were collected. Twelve items were remained after initial selection. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.56. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had acceptable goodness-of-fit yet local dependency between two items. Item response theory showed that most items had acceptable discrimination and difficulty parameters. Differential item functioning showed that tool had measurement invariance. 278 were followed up one year after the baseline. Follow-up showed that one-year incidence of ulceration among the patients was 3.6%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.61–0.93). The cut-off point of the tool was 4, when sensitivity and specificity were 0.62 and 0.75 respectively. The checklist has good psychometric properties according to mixed evidences from classical and modern test theory, and has good predictive capability.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Outpatient, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
2 Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
3 Department of Nursing, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
4 Department of Endocrinology, Air Force General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
5 Department of Endocrinology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
6 Diabetes Care Center, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau, China
7 Department of Endocrinology, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
8 Wound Healing Center, Jinshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
9 Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
10 Department of Gastroenterology, Puai Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
11 Department of Endocrinology, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, Hebei, China
12 Department of Nursing, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, China
13 Department of Endocrinology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
14 Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Changsha, Hunan, China