It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that influence chemotherapy disposition may help to personalize cancer treatment and limit toxicity. Genome-wide approaches are unbiased, compared with candidate gene studies, but usually require large cohorts. As most chemotherapy is given cyclically multiple blood sampling is required to adequately define drug disposition, limiting patient recruitment. We found that carboplatin and paclitaxel disposition are stable phenotypes in ovarian cancer patients and tested a genome-wide association study (GWAS) design to identify SNPs associated with chemotherapy disposition. We found highly significant SNPs in ABCC2, a known carboplatin transporter, associated with carboplatin clearance (asymptotic P = 5.2 × 106, empirical P = 1.4 × 10−5), indicating biological plausibility. We also identified novel SNPs associated with paclitaxel disposition, including rs17130142 with genome-wide significance (asymptotic P = 2.0 × 10−9, empirical P = 1.3 × 10−7). Although requiring further validation, our work demonstrated that GWAS of chemotherapeutic drug disposition can be effective, even in relatively small cohorts, and can be adopted in drug development and treatment programs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia; The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
2 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
3 Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
4 Unaffiliated, Boston, USA
5 Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
6 Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
7 Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
8 The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Sydney West Translational Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
9 The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney West Translational Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia; Pathology West, Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), Westmead, Sydney, Australia
10 Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia; The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Sydney West Translational Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia