Suppression of La Antigen Exerts Potential Antiviral Effects against Hepatitis A Virus

Abstract

Background

Despite the development and availability of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, HAV infection is still a major cause of acute hepatitis that occasionally leads to fatal liver disease. HAV internal ribosomal entry-site (IRES) is one of the attractive targets of antiviral agents against HAV. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of La, one of the cellular proteins, on HAV IRES-mediated translation and HAV replication.

Methods and Findings

We investigated the therapeutic feasibility of siRNAs specific for cellular cofactors for HAV IRES-mediated translation in cell culture. It was revealed that siRNA against La could inhibit HAV IRES activities as well as HAV subgenomic replication. We also found that the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors SD-1029 and AG490, which reduce La expression, could inhibit HAV IRES activities as well as HAV replication.

Conclusions

Inhibition of La by siRNAs and chemical agents could lead to the efficient inhibition of HAV IRES-mediated translation and HAV replication in cell culture models. La might play important roles in HAV replication and is being exploited as one of the therapeutic targets of host-targeting antivirals.

About the Authors:

Xia Jiang

Contributed equally to this work with: Xia Jiang, Tatsuo Kanda

Affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan

Tatsuo Kanda

Contributed equally to this work with: Xia Jiang, Tatsuo Kanda

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan

Shuang Wu

Affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan

Shingo Nakamoto

Affiliation: Department of Molecular Virology, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan

Kengo Saito

Affiliation: Department of Molecular Virology, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan

Hiroshi Shirasawa

Affiliation: Department of Molecular Virology, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan

Tomoko Kiyohara

Affiliation: Department of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Musashimurayama, Japan

Koji Ishii

Affiliation: Department of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Musashimurayama, Japan

Takaji Wakita

Affiliation: Department of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Musashimurayama, Japan

Hiroaki Okamoto

Affiliation: Division of Virology, Department of Infection and Immunity, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Japan

Osamu Yokosuka

Affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan

Introduction

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a non-enveloped single-stranded RNA virus, with ∼7.6 kb positive-sense genome. The genome includes 5′ non-translated region (5′NTR), one open reading frame encoding structural (VP4, VP2, VP3, VP4 and 2A) and non-structural proteins (2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D), and 3′NTR [1]. HAV genome translation could be initiated by cap-independent mechanism through HAV internal ribosomal entry-site (IRES) with a pyrimidine-rich tract, which is located at the down-stream part of 5′NTR [2]. HAV is still a major cause of acute hepatitis [3], [4]. Although acute liver failure due to HAV is not common, it is still occasionally fatal [5], despite HAV vaccine having become available [6]–[8]. This emphasizes the importance of the development of antiviral agents against HAV.

In general, two distinct classes of antiviral agents, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and host-targeting antivirals (HTAs), exist [9]. Several groups have reported DAAs against HAV, such as inhibitors of HAV 3C cysteine proteinase, which is essential for viral replication and infectivity [10]–[15]. Small interfering RNAs against HAV genome are also varieties of DAAs [16]–[18]. Several broad-target HTAs, examples of which include interferon-α, interferon-β, interferon-λ1 and amantadine, have been developed and tested against HAV [2], [19]–[25]. These compounds could inhibit HAV IRES-dependent translation as well as HAV replication [2], [21], [22]. HTAs of the targeted group are more precise in that they act on key host enzymes or cellular factors that are required for the viral lifecycle [9].

Our previous studies suggested that several siRNAs against HAV 5′NTR suppress HAV translation as well as HAV replication [17]. The nucleotide sequences of 5′NTR are one of the most conserved in HAV genomes [8], [26]. These facts suggest that HAV IRES is one of the attractive targets of antiviral agents against HAV. It has been reported that several cellular proteins such as autoantigen La [27], glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) [28], [29], polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB/hnRNPI) [29]–[31], poly(C) binding protein 2 (PCBP2/hnRNP-E2) [32], polyadenylate-binding protein-1 (PABP) [33], eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) [34] and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4G) [33], [35], [36] could interact with HAV IRES in vitro or in vivo, and could be associated with HAV replication.

Human La protein is predominantly localized in the nucleus and is associated with RNA metabolism [37]. It has been reported that La was associated with U1 RNA [38], telomerase RNA [39], 5′NTR of poliovirus [27], hepatitis C virus (HCV) [40] and GRP78/Bip [41]. La could interfere with IRES-mediated translation.

In the present study, we investigated the therapeutic feasibility of siRNAs specific for these putative cellular cofactors for HAV IRES-mediated translation. It was revealed that siRNA against La (siRNA-La) could inhibit HAV IRES activities as well as HAV subgenomic replication. We also found that JAK inhibitors SD-1029 and AG490, which inhibit La expression, could inhibit HAV IRES activities as well as HAV replication. The present study demonstrated the proof-of-concept for the inhibition of La as a method for suppressing HAV replication.

Results

Effects of silencing of cellular factors on HAV IRES-mediated translation

Although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood, it has been reported that HAV IRES could interact with various endogenous genes [27]–[34], suggesting important roles of these proteins in HAV IRES-mediated translation and HAV replication. La, GAPDH, PTB and PCBP2 have been shown to bind to HAV IRES domains IIIb and V [23], IIIa [28], I-IIIb [30] and I-IIIb [32], respectively. PABP, eIF4E and eIF4G also interact with HAV IRES [33]–[36]. To determine whether each siRNA against these factors had a specific siRNA effect, knockdown of these molecules was validated by Western blotting, respectively (Figure 1A–1G). To examine the effects of the knockdown of these genes on HAV IRES-mediated translation, Huh7 cells were cotransfected with each siRNA, and pSV40-HAV-IRES, which contains SV40 promoter, renilla luciferase (Rluc) and nt. 139–854 of HAV sequence fused firefly luciferase (Fluc) gene [2]. After 48 h transfection, the cell lysates were analyzed for HAV IRES activities (Fluc/Rluc) as previously described (Figure 1H) [17], [21]. Compared with the HAV IRES activity in Huh7 cells transfected with control siRNA (siRNA-control) (100%), that transfected with siRNA-La was 39%, but those of the others were not inhibited (Figure 1H). These results provide further evidence of La being a potential cofactor for HAV IRES activity, indicating the possible usefulness of siRNA-La against HAV infection.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Knockdown of La inhibits hepatitis A virus (HAV) internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) activities.

Effects of siRNAs on endogenous gene expression in Huh7 (A–G). Approximately 0.5×10⁶ cells were transfected with 100 nM siRNA against La (siRNA-La), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (siRNA-GAPDH), polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB/hnRNPI) (siRNA-PTB), poly(C) binding protein 2 (PCBP2/hnRNP-E2) (siRNA-PCBP2), polyadenylate-binding protein-1 (PABP) (siRNA-PABP), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) (siRNA-eIF4E), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4G) (siRNA-eIF4G) or control siRNA (siRNA-control). Protein expression was determined by Western blotting using each specific antibody. GAPDH or tubulin was used as control. (A) La, (B) GAPDH, (C) PTB/hnRNPI, (D) PCBP2, (E) PABP, (F) eIF4E, and (G) eIF4G expressions are shown. (H) Effects of each siRNA on the HAV IRES activities. Huh7 cells were cotransfected with 0.3 µg pSV40-HAV-IRES [2] with each siRNA at 100 nM. Cells were harvested 48 h post-transfection and luciferase activities were measured. Activities of HAV IRES were calculated as previously described [17], [21]. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 vs. Huh7 cells transfected with (siRNA-control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101993.g001

Effects of silencing of La on HAV subgenomic replication

Next, we examined the effect of the silencing of La on HAV subgenomic replication [42] (Figure 2). To test luciferase activity due to translation or translation and replication, we introduced a replication-competent HAV replicon (pT7-18f-LUC) and a replication-incompetent HAV replicon (pT7-18f-LUC mut) into HuhT7 cells [21], [42], with or without amantadine treatment, which is effective for suppressing HAV replication [2], [21]. Reporter assays were performed 24 h, 48 h or 72 h after transfection. Relative luciferase activities of pT7-18f-LUC cotransfected with siRNA-control or siRNA-La, respectively, were 100% or 15.4% at 24 h, 100% or 28.7% at 48 h, and 100% or 21.7% at 72 h after transfection (Figure 2A). On the other hand, those of pT7-18f-LUC mut cotransfected with siRNA-control or siRNA-La, respectively, were 94% or 3.7% at 24 h, 63.8% or 7.9% at 48 h, and 54.2% or 2.9% at 72 h after transfection (Figure 2A). Because the luciferase values of pT7-18f-LUC or pT7-18f-LUC mut were due to translation with replication or translation without replication, respectively [21], [42], it was confirmed that siRNA-La might suppress HAV IRES-mediated translation. The effects of siRNA-La also enhanced the amantadine induced-suppression of HAV subgenomic replication (Figure 2B).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. Knockdown of La inhibits hepatitis A virus (HAV) subgenomic replication.

(A) Effects of siRNA against La (siRNA-La) on the HAV replication-competent replicon pT7-18f-LUC [HAV Rep (+)] or replication-incompetent replicon pT7-18f-LUCmut [HAV Rep (−)] replication. Approximately 0.5×10⁶ HuhT7 cells were cotransfected with 0.3 µg pT7-18f-LUC/pT7-18f-LUCmut [42] and 100 nM siRNA against La (siRNA-La)/control siRNA (siRNA-control). After 24 h (left), 48 h (middle) or 72 h (right), cell lysates were collected and luciferase activities were measured. (B) Effects of siRNA against La (siRNA-La) with or without amantadine on the HAV subgenomic replication-competent replicon pT7-18f-LUC. Approximately 0.5×10⁶ HuhT7 cells were cotransfected with 0.3 µg pT7-18f-LUC and 50 nM siRNA against La (siRNA-La)/control siRNA (siRNA-control). After 24 h transfection, cells were treated with 5 µg/mL amantadine (white column) or without (black column). After 48 h (left) or 72 h (right) transfection, cell lysates were collected and luciferase activities were measured. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101993.g002

JAK inhibitors AG490 and SD-1029 could suppress La expression

Because it was reported that La expression is dependent on JAK2^V617F in murine pro B Ba/F3-EPOR-derived cell line [42], the effects of two JAK2 inhibitors, AG490 and SD-1029, on La expression were examined. Initially, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of AG490 and SD-1029 on African green kidney GL37 cells by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt (MTS) assay. AG490 concentration in a range of 100–10,000 nM and SD-1029 concentration in a range of 100–5,000 nM were not toxic in 48-h incubation (Figure 3A, 3B). With these concentrations, we tested the effects of AG490 and SD-1029 on La expression in GL37 cells, which supports HAV replication [21]. The results of Western blotting showed that La expression was decreased in a concentration-dependent manner with AG490 (Figure 3C) and SD-1029 (Figure 3D). These data prompted us to examine whether these drugs had an inhibitory effect on HAV IRES-mediated translation or HAV replication.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. Effects of AG490 and SD-1029 on cell viability and La expression in GL37 cells.

MTS assays of cells 48(A) or SD-1029 (B) at indicated concentrations. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Western blotting analysis. Approximately 1×10⁵ cells were incubated in the presence of AG490 (C) or SD-1029 (D) at indicated concentrations. Twenty-four hours after treatment, cell lysates were analyzed for La and GAPDH expressions using specific antibodies. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101993.g003

Effects of AG490 and SD-1029 on HAV IRES-mediated translation

COS7 cells stably expressing pSV40-HAV-IRES (COS7-HAV-IRES cells) were generated. To evaluate HAV IRES activity, after COS7 cells were cotransfected with pSV40-HAV IRES and pCXN2, and cultured in the presence of 500 µg/mL G418 for 3 weeks, COS7-HAV-IRES cells were established, making it easy to evaluate HAV IRES activity (Figure 4A). Treatment of these cells with AG490 resulted in the inhibition of HAV IRES activities (100%, 94%, 99%, 93%, 71% and 70% at 0, 100, 500, 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 nM AG490, respectively) (Figure 4B). Treatment of these cells with SD-1029 resulted in the inhibition of HAV IRES activities (100%, 95%, 96%, 85%, 42% and 21% at 0, 100, 500, 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 nM SD-1029, respectively) (Figure 4C).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 4. Effects of AG490 and SD-1029 on hepatitis A virus (HAV) internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) activities.

(A) HAV IRES activities of COS7 cells stably expressing pSV40-HAV-IRES (COS7-HAV IRES cells). 0.5×10⁵ cells were seeded, cell lysates were collected 24 h later, and luciferase assay was performed for determination of HAV IRES activities. (B) Effect of AG490 on HAV IRES activity in COS7-HAV IRES cells. (C) Effect of SD-1029 on HAV IRES activity in COS7-HAV IRES cells. The cells were cultured with AG490 or SD-1029 at the concentrations indicated, and reporter assay was performed after 24 h of treatment. Activities of HAV IRES were calculated as previously described [17], [21]. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101993.g004

Effects of AG490 and SD-1029 on HAV replication

We established GL37 stably expressing both short hairpin (sh)RNA-La (GL37-shLa cells) and control shRNA (GL37-shC cells) after GL37 cells were cotransfected with plasmid shRNA-La and plasmid shRNA-control, respectively, and cultured in the presence of puromycin. We examined whether shRNA-La could inhibit the replication of HAV HA11-1299 genotype IIIA strain in these GL37-derived cell lines. Western blotting analysis demonstrated that knockdown of La was validated in GL37-shLa cells, compared to GL37-shC cells (Figure 5A). As shown in Figure 5B, HAV RNA levels were 6.07×10⁵ copies/µg cellular RNA (92%) in GL37-shLa cells, in comparison with 6.63×10⁵ copies/µg cellular RNA (100%) in GL37-shC cells after 72 h of HAV infection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 5. Antiviral activities of shRNA-La, AG490 and SD-1029 on hepatitis A virus (HAV) replication.

(A) La protein expression in GL37 stably expressing shRNA-La (GL37-shLa cells) and GL37 stably expressing control shRNA (GL37-shC cells). Western blotting was performed with specific antibodies indicated. (B) Real-time PCR analysis of intracellular HAV RNA following HAV HA11-1299 genotype IIIA strain infection in GL37-shC or GL37-shLa cells. (C) Suppression of HAV infection in GL37 treated with AG490 at concentrations indicated. (D) Suppression of HAV infection in GL37 treated with SD-1029 at concentrations indicated. Cells were treated with AG490 or SD-1209 for 24 h, infected with HAV HA11-1299 genotype IIIA strain at MOI of 0.1, and washed with PBS 7 h later. After 96 h of HAV infection, cellular RNA was extracted, and HAV RNA levels were determined using real-time RT-PCR. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101993.g005

Next, we investigated whether AG490 or SD-1029 could inhibit the replication of HAV HA11-1299 genotype IIIA strain in GL37 cells. Cells were treated with AG490 or SD-1029 for 24 h, infected with HAV HA11-1299 genotype IIIA strain at MOI of 0.1, and washed with PBS 7 h later. After 96 h of HAV infection, cellular RNA was extracted, and HAV RNA levels were determined using real-time RT-PCR. As shown in Figure 5C, HAV RNA levels were 5.27×10⁴, 5.46×10⁴ or 2.58×10⁴ copies/µg of cellular RNA (63%, 65% or 31%) in GL37 treated with 100, 1,000 or 10,000 nM AG490, respectively, in comparison with 8.35×10⁴ copies/µg of cellular RNA (100%) in GL37 without any treatment after 96 h of HAV infection at MOI of 0.1. As shown in Figure 5D, HAV RNA levels were 4.26×10⁴ or 4.12×10⁴ copies/µg cellular RNA (51% or 49%) in GL37 treated with 100 or 1,000 nM SD-1029, respectively, in comparison with that in GL37 without any treatment after 96 h of HAV infection at a MOI of 0.1. ELISA analysis of tissue culture-adapted HAV KRM003 genotype IIIB strain in GL37 cells [21] also showed mild inhibition of viral propagation with 500–1,000 nM AG490 but not with SD-1029 at 48 h post-infection (data not shown).

Discussion

In the present study, we examined the effects of the knockdown of La in cell lines infected with HAV. We observed the inhibition of HAV replication by sh-La. We also observed that inhibitors of La, AG490 and SD-1029, induced the suppression of HAV genotype IIIA replication. Of course, HAV vaccine has already been developed. Although patients with acute hepatitis A are not usually treated with antiviral drugs, there are occasionally patients with severe acute hepatitis A such as fatal acute liver failure. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to report that a reduction of La can suppress HAV replication in cell culture.

It has been reported that down-regulation of La was induced by (-)-epigallocatechin gallate, iron chelator deferxamine and JAK inhibitor AZD1480 [43]–[45]. Ferric ammonium citrate up-regulates La expression [45]. It was reported that HBSC-11, an inhibitor of La, has an anti-HBV activity in which HBSC-11 may be mediated by a reduction in La levels [46]. Because we did not observe any effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate or ferric ammonium citrate on La expression in our experiments (data not shown), we chose JAK inhibitors in the present study. Our study suggested that anti-HAV activity of AG490 and SD-1029 should also be mediated by a reduction of La. It is possible that La inhibitors could be useful as antiviral drugs.

The use of 1,000 nM of AG490 and SD-1029 reduced La expression in GL37 cells (Figure 3C, 3D). However, there were no effects on HAV IRES activities up to this concentration in COS7-HAV-IRES cells (Figure 4B, 4C). These discrepancies might be a result of these two different cell lines, or this might be one of the points needing improvement in COS7-HAV-IRES cells.

Although AZD1480 was an inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2 [46], AG490 is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of JAK2, JAK3, epidermal growth factor (EGFR) and v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (Neu) [47], [48], and JAK2 inhibitor III SD-1029 acts as a JAK2-selective inhibitor [49]. Of interest is that these three JAK inhibitors reduce cellular La expression (Figure 3C and 3D) [45]. HAV and HCV modulate the JAK/STAT signaling pathway [50], [51]. Further studies will be needed at this stage, although several specific JAK inhibitors have been developed and there are ongoing trials for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms [52], allergic skin diseases [53] and rheumatoid arthritis [54].

HAV replicates in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes, although La exists predominantly in the nucleus [37]. Previous studies have suggested that La associates with IRES-mediated translation [27], [40], [41], and the present study also demonstrated that La plays a potential role in HAV IRES-mediated translation. Our result also showed that HAV IRES-mediated translation was helped by La, in contrast to the previous observation [27]. These differences might be related to the experimental system such as in vivo or in vitro, and cell lines. Although HAV RNA levels were reduced by 5.6×10⁴ copies/µg cellular RNA when comparing GL37-shLa cells with GL37-shC cells (Figure 5B), it might be possible that other host factors are involved in suppressing HAV replication by JAK inhibitors. Further studies will be needed.

In the study field of HCV infection, the development of two distinct antiviral agents, DAAs and HTAs, could lead to higher sustained virological response rates via reductions of adverse events and treatment duration [9] compared to the former standard treatment [55]. The use of La inhibitor, one of the HTAs for HAV, alone or in combination with DAAs, might be beneficial for certain patients infected with HAV.

There are three HAV genotypes, I, II and III, of human origin [56]. The inhibitory effects of AG490 and SD-1029 on HAV subgenotype IIIA strain were observed by real-time PCR methods. But only weak inhibition of AG490 on HAV subgenotype IIIB was observed by ELISA methods. This may be related to the different methods of detection for HAV, that is, by RT-PCR or ELISA. There might also be differences among the different HAV subgenotypes, although HTAs have a high genetic barrier to resistance and a pan-genotypic antiviral activity [57]. Further studies on the exact mechanism of the association between La and HAV replication will be needed. In conclusion, inhibition of La by siRNAs and chemical agents could lead to the inhibition of HAV IRES-mediated translation and HAV replication in cell culture models. Our findings suggest that La plays important roles in HAV replication and should be exploited as one of the therapeutic targets.

Materials and Methods

Cells, virus and reagents

Human hepatoma cells (Huh7 and HuhT7, which stably express T7-RNA polymerase [42]) and African green monkey kidney cells (COS7 and GL37 [21], [22], [56], [58]), were grown in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma) at 37°C in 5% CO₂. Huh7 and COS7 cells were purchased from JCRB cell bank, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Osaka, Japan. HAV subgenomic replicon was previously described [42]. Briefly, the structures of the competent HAV replicon (HAV) and incompetent HAV replicon (mut-HAV replicon) containing a frame-shift mutation in polymerase 3D were reported [42]. These replicons also contain an open-reading frame of firefly luciferase. HAV HA11-1299 genotype IIIA strain and HAV KRM003 genotype IIIB strain [21] were also used. The simian virus (SV) 40 promoter plasmid pSV40-HAV IRES was used as reported previously [2], [17]; it encodes in a bicistronic fashion the Renilla reniformis luciferase (Rluc), the hepatitis A virus internal ribosomal entry site (HAV IRES), followed by the firefly luciferase (Fluc). AG490 (Calbiochem, Billerica, MA, USA), SD-1029 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and amantadine (Sigma) were used in the present study.

Transfection of shRNA and siRNAs

To stably establish GL37-shLa and control GL37-shC cells, respectively, we used the plasmids shRNA-La (shLa) and shRNA-control (shC) purchased from Santa Cruz. After electroporation of the plasmids, GL37 cells were placed in 10-mm-well plates (Iwaki Glass, Tokyo, Japan), and treated with 3 µg/mL puromycin for selection of antibiotic-resistant colonies over a 2-week period. We then confirmed the expression of endogenous La by Western blotting. siRNAs against La (siRNA-La), GAPDH (siRNA-GAPDH), PTB (siRNA-PTB), PCBP2 (siRNA-PCBP2), PABP (siRNA-PABP), eIF4E (siRNA-eIF4E), eIF4G (siRNA-eIF4G) and control siRNA (siRNA-control) were purchased from Santa Cruz.

Transfection and luciferase assay

Huh7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates one day before transfecton, and cotransfected with 0.3 µg of the pSV40-HAV-IRES plasmid and 100 nM of each siRNA using Effectene transfection reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Forty-eight hours after transfection, cell lysates were collected using a luciferase lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Luciferase activity was measured with a luminometer (AB-2200-R; ATTO, Tokyo, Japan).

Western blotting

Cells were lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer, and after sonication, lysates were used for Western blotting analysis. Briefly, proteins were subjected to electrophoresis on 5–20% polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). Membranes were incubated with specific antibodies for La, GAPDH, PTB, PCBP2, PABP, eIF4E, eIF4G and tubulin (Santa Cruz). After washing, membranes were incubated with secondary horse-radish peroxidase–conjugated antibodies. Signals were detected by means of enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and scanned by image analyzer LAS-4000 and Image Gauge (version 3.1) (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan) and Scion Image (Scion) software.

RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR

After 96 h or 72 h of HAV infection, total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). One microgram of RNA was reverse-transcribed with the PrimeScript RT reagent (Perfect Real Time; Takara, Otsu, Japan). PCR amplification was performed on cDNA templates using primers specific for HAV (sense primer 5′-AGGCTACGGGTGAAACCTCTTAG-3′ and antisense primer 5′-GCCGCTGTTACCCTATCCAA-3′) [59]. For RNA quantification, real-time PCR was performed using Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Forester City, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. Data analysis was based on the Standard curve method.

MTS assay

To evaluate cell viability, MTS assays were performed using a Cell Titer Aqueous One Solution Proliferation Assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgments

We thank Verena Gauss-Müller for providing HAV subgenomic replicon and HuhT7 cells.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XJ T. Kanda SW OY. Performed the experiments: XJ T. Kanda SW SN KS HS T. Kiyohara KI TW HO. Analyzed the data: XJ T. Kanda SW HS T. Kiyohara KI TW HO OY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HS T. Kanda KI OY. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: XJ T. Kanda T. Kiyohara KI TW HO OY.

Citation: Jiang X, Kanda T, Wu S, Nakamoto S, Saito K, Shirasawa H, et al. (2014) Suppression of La Antigen Exerts Potential Antiviral Effects against Hepatitis A Virus. PLoS ONE 9(7): e101993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101993

References

1. Debing Y, Neyts J, Thibaut HJ (2013) Molecular Biology and Inhibitors of Hepatitis A Virus. Med Res Rev [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1002/med.21292. PubMed: 23722879.

2. Kanda T, Yokosuka O, Imazeki F, Fujiwara K, Nagao K, et al. (2005) Amantadine inhibits hepatitis A virus internal ribosomal entry site-mediated translation in human hepatoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 331: 621–629

3. Jacobsen KH, Wiersma ST (2010) Hepatitis A virus seroprevalence by age and world region, 1990 and 2005. Vaccine 28: 6653–6657

4. Lavanchy D (2013) Viral hepatitis: global goals for vaccination. J Clin Virol 55: 296–302

5. Taylor RM, Davern T, Munoz S, Han SH, McGuire B, et al. (2006) Fulminant hepatitis A virus infection in the United States: Incidence, prognosis, and outcomes. Hepatology 44: 1589–1597

6. Sjogren M (2003) Immunization and the decline of viral hepatitis as a cause of acute liver failure. Hepatology 38: 554–556

7. Kanda T, Jeong SH, Imazeki F, Fujiwara K, Yokosuka O (2010) Analysis of 5′ nontranslated region of hepatitis A viral RNA genotype I from South Korea: comparison with disease severities. PLoS One 5: e15139

8. Wu S, Nakamoto S, Kanda T, Jiang X, Nakamura M, et al. (2014) Ultra-deep sequencing analysis of the hepatitis A virus 5′-untranslated region among cases of the same outbreak from a single source. Int J Med Sci 11: 60–64

9. Baugh JM, Garcia-Rivera JA, Gallay PA (2013) Host-targeting agents in the treatment of hepatitis C: a beginning and an end? Antiviral Res 100: 555–561

10. Malcolm BA, Lowe C, Shechosky S, McKay RT, Yang CC, et al. (1995) Peptide aldehyde inhibitors of hepatitis A virus 3C proteinase. Biochemistry 34: 8172–8179 PubMed: 7794931.

11. Morris TS, Frormann S, Shechosky S, Lowe C, Lall MS, et al. (1997) In vitro and ex vivo inhibition of hepatitis A virus 3C proteinase by a peptidyl monofluoromethyl ketone. Bioorg Med Chem 5: 797–807

12. Huang Y, Malcolm BA, Vederas JC (1999) Synthesis and testing of azaglutamine derivatives as inhibitors of hepatitis A virus (HAV) 3C proteinase. Bioorg Med Chem 7: 607–619

13. Lall MS, Karvellas C, Vederas JC (1999) Beta-lactones as a new class of cysteine proteinase inhibitors: inhibition of hepatitis A virus 3C proteinase by N-Cbz-serine beta-lactone. Org Lett 1999; 1: 803–806 PubMed: 10823207.

14. Lall MS, Ramtohul YK, James MN, Vederas JC (2002) Serine and threonine beta-lactones: a new class of hepatitis A virus 3C cysteine proteinase inhibitors. J Org Chem 67: 1536–1547

15. Yin J, Cherney MM, Bergmann EM, Zhang J, Huitema C, et al. (2006) An episulfide cation (thiiranium ring) trapped in the active site of HAV 3C proteinase inactivated by peptide-based ketone inhibitors. J Mol Biol 361: 673–686

16. Kanda T, Kusov Y, Yokosuka O, Gauss-Müller V (2004) Interference of hepatitis A virus replication by small interfering RNAs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 318: 341–345

17. Kanda T, Zhang B, Kusov Y, Yokosuka O, Gauss-Müller V (2005) Suppression of hepatitis A virus genome translation and replication by siRNAs targeting the internal ribosomal entry site. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 330: 1217–1223

18. Kusov Y, Kanda T, Palmenberg A, Sgro JY, Gauss-Müller V (2006) Silencing of hepatitis A virus infection by small interfering RNAs. J Virol 80: 5599–5610

19. Yoshiba M, Inoue K, Sekiyama K (1994) Interferon for hepatitis A. Lancet 343: 288–289

20. Vallbracht A, Hofmann L, Wurster KG, Flehmig B (1984) Persistent infection of human fibroblasts by hepatitis A virus. J Gen Virol 65: 609–615

21. Yang L, Kiyohara T, Kanda T, Imazeki F, Fujiwara K, et al. (2010) Inhibitory effects on HAV IRES-mediated translation and replication by a combination of amantadine and interferon-alpha. Virol J 7: 212

22. Kanda T, Wu S, Kiyohara T, Nakamoto S, Jiang X, et al. (2012) Interleukin-29 suppresses hepatitis A and C viral internal ribosomal entry site-mediated translation. Viral Immunol 25: 379–386

23. Widell A, Hansson BG, Oberg B, Nordenfelt E (1986) Influence of twenty potentially antiviral substances on in vitro multiplication of hepatitis A virus. Antiviral Res 6: 103–112 PubMed: 3010855.

24. Crance JM, Biziagos E, Passagot J, van Cuyck-Gandré H, Deloince R (1990) Inhibition of hepatitis A virus replication in vitro by antiviral compounds. J Med Virol 31: 155–160 PubMed: 2167349.

25. Debing Y, Kaplan GG, Neyts J, Jochmans D (2013) Rapid and convenient assays to assess potential inhibitory activity on in vitro hepatitis A replication. Antiviral Res 98: 325–331

26. Ching KZ, Nakano T, Chapman LE, Demby A, Robertson BH (2002) Genetic characterization of wild-type genotype VII hepatitis A virus. J Gen Virol 83: 53–60 PubMed: 11752700.

27. Cordes S, Kusov Y, Heise T, Gauss-Müller V (2008) La autoantigen suppresses IRES-dependent translation of the hepatitis A virus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 368: 1014–1019

28. Schultz DE, Hardin CC, Lemon SM (1996) Specific interaction of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase with the 5′-nontranslated RNA of hepatitis A virus. J Biol Chem 271: 14134–14142

29. Yi M, Schultz DE, Lemon SM (2000) Functional significance of the interaction of hepatitis A virus RNA with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH): opposing effects of GAPDH and polypyrimidine tract binding protein on internal ribosome entry site function. J Virol 74: 6459–6468 PubMed: 10864658.

30. Venkatramana M, Ray PS, Chadda A, Das S (2003) A 25 kDa cleavage product of polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) present in mouse tissues prevents PTB binding to the 5′ untranslated region and inhibits translation of hepatitis A virus RNA. Virus Res 98: 141–149

31. Kanda T, Gauss-Müller V, Cordes S, Tamura R, Okitsu K, et al. (2010) Hepatitis A virus (HAV) proteinase 3C inhibits HAV IRES-dependent translation and cleaves the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein. J Viral Hepat 17: 618–623

32. Graff J, Cha J, Blyn LB, Ehrenfeld E (1998) Interaction of poly(rC) binding protein 2 with the 5′ noncoding region of hepatitis A virus RNA and its effects on translation. J Virol 72: 9668–9675 PubMed: 9811700.

33. Zhang B, Morace G, Gauss-Müller V, Kusov Y (2007) Poly(A) binding protein, C-terminally truncated by the hepatitis A virus proteinase 3C, inhibits viral translation. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 5975–5984

34. Ali IK, McKendrick L, Morley SJ, Jackson RJ (2001) Activity of the hepatitis A virus IRES requires association between the cap-binding translation initiation factor (eIF4E) and eIF4G. J Virol 75: 7854–7863

35. Borman AM, Kean KM (1997) Intact eukaryotic initiation factor 4G is required for hepatitis A virus internal initiation of translation. Virology 237: 129–136

36. Redondo N, Sanz MA, Steinberger J, Skern T, Kusov Y, et al. (2012) Translation directed by hepatitis A virus IRES in the absence of active eIF4F complex and eIF2. PLoS One 7: e52065

37. Wolin SL, Cedervall T (2002) The La protein. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 375–403 PubMed: 12045101.

38. Madore SJ, Wieben ED, Pederson T (1984) Eukaryotic small ribonucleoproteins. Anti-La human autoantibodies react with U1 RNA-protein complexes. J Biol Chem 259: 1929–1933 PubMed: 6229541.

39. Aigner S, Lingner J, Goodrich KJ, Grosshans CA, Shevchenko A, et al. (2000) Euplotes telomerase contains an La motif protein produced by apparent translational frameshifting. EMBO J 19: 6230–6239 PubMed: 11080168.

40. Das S, Ott M, Yamane A, Tsai W, Gromeier M, et al. (1998) A small yeast RNA blocks hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site (HCV IRES)-mediated translation and inhibits replication of a chimeric poliovirus under translational control of the HCV IRES element. J Virol 72: 5638–5647 PubMed: 9621022.

41. Kim YK, Back SH, Rho J, Lee SH, Jang SK (2001) La autoantigen enhances translation of BiP mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 5009–5016

42. Gauss-Müller V, Kusov YY (2002) Replication of a hepatitis A virus replicon detected by genetic recombination in vivo. J Gen Virol 83: 2183–2192 PubMed: 12185272.

43. Nakatake M, Monte-Mor B, Debili N, Casadevall N, Ribrag V, et al. (2012) JAK2(V617F) negatively regulates p53 stabilization by enhancing MDM2 via La expression in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Oncogene 31: 1323–1333

44. Hsu S, Dickinson DP, Qin H, Lapp C, Lapp D, et al. (2005) Inhibition of autoantigen expression by (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (the major constituent of green tea) in normal human cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 315: 805–811

45. Wang Q, Liu Y, An D, Diao H, Xu W, et al. (2012) Regulation of hepatitis C virus translation initiation by iron: role of eIF3 and La protein. Virus Res 167: 302–309

46. Tang J, Huang ZM, Chen YY, Zhang ZH, Liu GL, et al. (2012) A novel inhibitor of human La protein with anti-HBV activity discovered by structure-based virtual screening and in vitro evaluation. PLoS One 7: e36363

47. Meydan N, Grunberger T, Dadi H, Shahar M, Arpaia E, et al. (1996) Inhibition of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by a Jak-2 inhibitor. Nature 379: 645–648 PubMed: 8628398.

48. Okitsu K, Kanda T, Imazeki F, Yonemitsu Y, Ray RB, et al. (2010) Involvement of interleukin-6 and androgen receptor signaling in pancreatic cancer. Genes Cancer 1: 859–867

49. Duan Z, Bradner JE, Greenberg E, Levine R, Foster R, et al. (2006) SD-1029 inhibits signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 nuclear translocation. Clin Cancer Res 12: 6844–6852

50. Goswami BB, Kulka M, Ngo D, Cebula TA (2004) Apoptosis induced by a cytopathic hepatitis A virus is dependent on caspase activation following ribosomal RNA degradation but occurs in the absence of 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase. Antiviral Res 2004 63: 153–166

51. Basu A, Meyer K, Ray RB, Ray R (2001) Hepatitis C virus core protein modulates the interferon-induced transacting factors of Jak/Stat signaling pathway but does not affect the activation of downstream IRF-1 or 561 gene. Virology 288: 379–390 PubMed: 11601909.

52. Rosenthal A, Mesa RA (2014) Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Expert Opin Pharmacother [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1517/14656566.2014.913024. PubMed: 24766055.

53. Gonzales AJ, Bowman JW, Fici GJ, Zhang M, Mann DW, et al. (2014) Oclacitinib (APOQUEL®) is a novel Janus kinase inhibitor with activity against cytokines involved in allergy. J Vet Pharmacol Ther [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1111/jvp.12101. PubMed: 24495176.

54. Cutolo M, Meroni M (2013) Clinical utility of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Inflamm Res 6: 129–137

55. Kanda T, Imazeki F, Yokosuka O (2010) New antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol Int 4: 548–561

56. Robertson BH, Jansen RW, Khanna B, Totsuka A, Nainan OV, et al. (1992) Genetic relatedness of hepatitis A virus strains recovered from different geographical regions. J Gen Virol 73: 1365–1377 PubMed: 1318940.

57. Zeisel MB, Lupberger J, Fofana I, Baumert TF (2013) Host-targeting agents for prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis C - perspectives and challenges. J Hepatol 58: 375–384

58. Kiyohara T, Totsuka A, Yoneyama T, Ishii K, Ito T, et al. (2009) Characterization of anti-idiotypic antibodies mimicking antibody- and receptor-binding sites on hepatitis A virus. Arch Virol 154: 1263–1269

59. Casas N, Amarita F, de Marañón IM (2007) Evaluation of an extracting method for the detection of Hepatitis A virus in shellfish by SYBR-Green real-time RT-PCR. Int J Food Microbiol 120: 179–185 PubMed: 17900731.