It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study assessed the effects of crystalloid versus synthetic colloid in vitro on immune cells co-cultured with mouse splenocytes. Mouse splenocytes were co-cultured with three different types of fluid: Plasma solution-A® (CJ HealthCare, Seoul, Korea; the crystalloid group); Tetraspan 6%® (B. Braun Medical, Melsungen, Germany; the Colloid-T group); and Volulyte 6%® (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg vor dér-Höhe, Germany; Colloid-V group). To evaluate the acquired immune response, cluster of differentiation (CD) 4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were measured. To evaluate the innate immune response, neutrophils were measured. The frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells did not differ significantly among the three groups on day 1 or 3. However, the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the two synthetic colloid groups were significantly higher than those in the crystalloid group on day 7. On day 1, the frequency of neutrophils was significantly lower in the two synthetic colloid groups, compared with the crystalloid group. However, the values on the other days were similar among all three groups. In conclusion, crystalloid had a limited effect on the immune response; on the other hand, synthetic colloid increased the acquired immune response, although it temporarily inhibited the innate immune response.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Department of Microbiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 BK21 Plus, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
3 Department of Microbiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
4 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine, Konkuk University Medical Centre, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
5 Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine, Konkuk University Medical Centre, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Infection and Immunology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea