Severe influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in pregnant women and neonatal outcomes, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2009

Abstract

To investigate the factors associated with death and describe the gestational outcomes in pregnant women with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, we conducted a case-control study (deaths and recovered) in hospitalized pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 with severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) in the state of São Paulo from June 9 to December 1, 2009. All cases were evaluated, and four controls that were matched by the epidemiological week of hospitalization of the case were randomly selected for each case. Cases and controls were selected from the National Disease Notification System-SINAN Influenza-web. The hospital records from 126 hospitals were evaluated, and home interviews were conducted using standardized forms. A total of 48 cases and 185 controls were investigated. Having had a previous health visit to a healthcare provider for an influenza episode before hospital admission was a risk factor for death (adjusted OR (OR_adj) of 7.93, 95% CI 2.19–28.69). Although not significant in the multiple analysis (OR_adj of 2.13, 95% CI 0.91–5.00), the 3^rd trimester deserves attention, with an OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.13–4.37 in the univariate analysis. Antiviral treatment was a protective factor when administered within 48 hours of symptom onset (OR_adj = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05–0.50) and from 48 to 72 hours (OR_adj = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.87). There was a higher proportion of fetal deaths and preterm births among cases (p = 0.001) and live births with low weight (p = 0.019), compared to control subjects who gave birth during hospitalization. After discharge, control subjects had a favorable neonatal outcome. Early antiviral treatment during the presence of a flu-like illness is an important factor in reducing mortality from influenza in pregnant women and unfavorable neonatal outcomes. It is important to monitor pregnant women, particularly in the 3^rd trimester of gestation, with influenza illness for diagnosis and early treatment.

About the Authors:

Ana Freitas Ribeiro

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Current address: Emílio Ribas Institute of Infectious Diseases, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Health Administration Graduate Department, Universidade Nove de Julho, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Affiliations Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health - University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9111-4510

Alessandra Cristina Guedes Pellini

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Beatriz Yuko Kitagawa

Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Current address: Municipal Health Department of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Affiliation: Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Daniel Marques

Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Geraldine Madalosso

Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Joao Fred

Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Ricardo Kerti Mangabeira Albernaz

Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Telma Regina Marques Pinto Carvalhanas

Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Epidemiological Surveillance Center, Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Dirce Maria Trevisan Zanetta

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health - University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Introduction

Pregnancy constitutes an important risk for the development of influenza-related complications and hospitalization. The 1918 and 1957 influenza pandemics showed increased mortality in pregnant women [1,2]. The reasons for the increased risk during pregnancy probably derive from a combination of immunological and physiological factors. An increased susceptibility to certain intracellular pathogens has been described [3].

The identification of a new viral subtype, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, in Mexico and the United States in April 2009 and its worldwide dissemination led the WHO to announce the beginning of a pandemic in June 2009 [4]. A study developed during the first month of the outbreak in United States estimated that the rate of admission for pandemic H1N1 influenza in pregnant women was higher than in the general population (0.32 per 100,000 pregnant women, 95% CI 0.13–0.52 vs 0.076 per 100,000 population at risk, 95% CI 0.07–0.09)[5]. Since 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined this group as the highest priority for vaccination [6].

A study conducted in California among hospitalized pregnant women and women of reproductive age with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 showed that pregnant women in the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters who delayed treatment(≥ 48 hours) were more likely to undergo admission to the ICU or death [7]. Most studies evaluate risk factors for increased severity in pregnant women [8,9,10,11] and few studies have analyzed the risk factors for death in pregnant women from influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. A systematic review study showed a higher risk of hospitalization in pregnant women with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, with relative risks ranging from 4.3 to 7.2. However, only one study showed a higher risk of death in pregnant women with influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 (RR 10.2) and seven studies presented no significant risks (0.3 to 1.3)[12]. Meta-analysis also showed no higher risk of death in pregnant women with pandemic influenza, OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.46)[8]. A higher risk of fetal abnormalities in pregnant women with both seasonal influenza virus infection and A(H1N1)pdm09 infection was reported. In addition, women with a diagnosis of A(H1N1)pdm09 infection had a higher risk of placental problems, antepartum haemorrhage, and antepartum complications [13].

During the pandemic, there were a significant number of deaths in pregnant women from influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in São Paulo, which justifies this study. The objective of this study was to analyze factors associated with death in pregnant women with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) and describe the gestational and neonatal outcomes.

Methods

The State of São Paulo has a population of more than 41 million inhabitants, with 598,473 live births in 2009, according to data from the Information Department of the Unified Public Health System (DATASUS) of the Ministry of Health.

A case-control study was conducted that evaluated pregnant women living in São Paulo with confirmed infection of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and hospitalized with SARI, defined as: fever and cough and dyspnea or pneumonia or respiratory failure or tachypnea or radiological alterations consistent with pneumonia or oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation. The definition of SARI has been adapted from the one stated by the WHO to increase sensitivity in the detection of cases and controls [14].

In 2009, the Ministry of Health of Brazil established the compulsory notification of any hospitalized case of influenza associated with SARI and the inclusion of an epidemiological investigation into the Influenza-web database of the National Disease Notification System (SINAN). All hospitalized pregnant women who were notified with influenza associated with SARI and eventually died during the epidemic period from July 9^th to December 1^st 2009 in São Paulo were included in the analysis. For each death (case), four controls were randomly selected from those who recovered. The cases and controls were identified from the SINAN, using the following variables for selection: RT-PCR (positive for influenza A/H1N1pdm09), final classification (confirmed), evolution (recovered or death), hospitalization (yes), date of hospitalization, hospital and residence in the São Paulo State. The controls were matched by epidemiological week of admission date of the case to adjust for possible variations in access to treatment and clinical protocols. All pregnant women had a laboratory confirmation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 from a sample of respiratory secretions using the RT-PCR method, performed at the Adolfo Lutz Institute, the public health laboratory [15].

For data collection, trained health professionals used two standardized forms: one to collect hospital record information and the second was used for home interviews. For the cases, the interviews were conducted with close family members, and for the controls, the interviews were conducted with the patients themselves. The hospital form included the following variables: pathological history, health care, symptoms on admission, admission to the intensive care unit, antiviral treatment (the Ministry of Health released the antiviral oseltamivir), use of antibiotics, complications, laboratory tests, radiological examinations, evolution, gestational and neonatal outcomes. The home form included the following variables: sociodemographics, history of a previous health visit to a healthcare provider for the influenza episode that resulted in hospitalization (after the onset of symptoms and before hospital admission date), vaccination history and gestational and neonatal outcome. Education level was classified as low (no schooling or incomplete primary), medium (complete primary or incomplete high school) or high (complete high school or university). Occupations were grouped using the occupational risk pyramid for the pandemic in the occupational safety and health Act of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-CDC, which classified the occupation risk for influenza infection as low (professional managers and other university and technical professionals without close contact with the population), medium (professionals in the areas of education, trade, service and administration with close contact with the population), or high and very high risk (doctors, nurses, other health professionals and support staff in the health services) [16]. A pre-test with 10 patients with Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was performed to identify and correct any errors. The questionnaires are presented in S1 Data collection form and the complete data used in this study are shown in S1 Database.

The study was started during the epidemic to support the actions of epidemiological surveillance, and the use of the data was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health of USP (Protocol 2283, OF.COEP/312/11). Data collection complied with the recommendations of the National Health Council for Research in Human Beings, including the signing of a consent form.

Clinical and demographic variables are presented as medians and interquartile ranges or percentages, Mann-Whitney U or chi-square tests were used for comparisons, as appropriate. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to evaluate factors associated with death.

For the multiple logistic regression, variables were selected with a p of <0.20 in the univariate analysis and those considered important for the adjustment. The initial model included: health plan; previous visit to a healthcare provider; the presence of at least one of the high-risk medical conditions for developing influenza-related complications (adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention): asthma, neurological and developmental disorders, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, hemoglobinopathies, endocrine disorders, immunosuppressive diseases and obesity, with the absence of these conditions as reference; the use of an antiviral [no use (as reference), ≤ 48 hours from the first symptoms, > 48 and ≤ 72 hours, > 72 hours], pregnancy trimester [1^st and 2^nd trimesters (as reference) and 3^rd trimester]. The data were controlled for education level and age. The Wald and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the significance of the variables and test the fit of the model, respectively.

Analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), version 17.0. P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

In São Paulo, in 2009, 51 pregnant women with confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection notified in SINAN eventually died. A total of 204 controls were randomly selected among the 525 pregnant women hospitalized with confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection notified in SINAN who recovered. The investigation was conducted in 126 hospitals where all cases and controls were hospitalized. With regard to the 51 cases and 204 controls initially identified in SINAN for the study, 22 files were missing or did not meet the case or control requirements, resulting in 48 cases and 185 controls reviewed. Two pregnant women who died were identified in another study[13], and included in the present. The home interviews were performed for 42 cases (87.5%) and 165 controls (89.2%), as shown in Fig 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Flow chart for the selection of cases and controls among pregnant women reported in the National Disease Notification System—SINAN—São Paulo State, 2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.g001

Table 1 presents the socio-demographic characteristics of the pregnant women. There were no significant differences in socio-demographic distribution between cases and controls, and median age, family income, education level, smoking history, occupational risk for influenza infection, previous pregnancy and existence of private health insurance were not associated with death.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Distribution of pregnant women hospitalized with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome, who died (cases) or recovered (control), according to general and sociodemographic characteristics, State of Sao Paulo, 2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.t001

Table 2 shows the distribution of cases and controls according to clinical variables and visits to a healthcare provider. A total of 92.7% of cases sought medical care for the influenza episode prior to hospitalization. This proportion was higher than that of the controls. When evaluating the preconditions for admission, the presence of other risk conditions for developing complications related to influenza did not differ in cases and controls. Asthma and obesity were the most common conditions, among cases (8.3% each) and controls (8.9% vs. 3.2%, respectively).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Distribution of pregnant women hospitalized for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 associated with severe acute respiratory illness who died (cases) or recovered (controls) according to risk conditions and clinical aspects, State of Sao Paulo, 2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.t002

The use of an antiviral during hospitalization was an important protective factor against death, with proportions of treatment at 77.1% and 91.4% in cases and controls, respectively. The proportions of women who received antiviral within the first 48 hours of symptoms were 27% and 63.4% in cases and controls, respectively. The protective effect was also observed for treatment starting within 48 to 72 hours (5.4% and 13% in cases and controls, respectively). The initiation of treatment with an antiviral more than 72 hours after the onset of symptoms did not present significant protection. The median number of days between the date of the first symptoms and hospitalization was four for the cases and two for the controls (p = 0.003). Treatment with antibiotics was used in 100% of cases and 64.9% of controls. The average number of antibiotics used was 3.9 for cases and 1.1 for controls. Among the cases, there was a higher proportion of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (95.8% vs. 16.2%), and a higher proportion of cases underwent mechanical ventilation compared to controls (100% vs. 13%). The cases exhibited higher rates of complications than the controls (100% vs. 10.3%), predominantly: respiratory distress syndrome (72.9% vs. 4.9%), shock (75.0% vs. 0.5%), sepsis (64.6% vs. 3.2%), infections (35.4% vs. 3.8%) and renal alterations (35.4% vs. 2.7%). There were three episodes of pre-eclampsia, which evolved to death (cases) and one in the control group. None of them fulfilled the definition of HELLP syndrome, named for three features of the disease (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet levels). All cases that evolve to death had influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 as the main cause in the death certificate.

Co-infection with other infectious agents occurred in 20.4% of cases and 1.6% of controls, with the following pathogens found: Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 4), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 3), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2), Enterococcus spp. (n = 2), Candida spp (n = 2), Candida albicans (n = 1), Klebsiella spp. (n = 1) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 1). The results of chest radiology were assessed in 93.8% of cases and in 80% of controls. Among the cases, 91.6% presented with alterations, with a consolidation pattern evident in 50% of cases. Among the controls, 59.5% presented alterations, with a consolidation pattern evident in 14.4% of cases.

Table 3 shows the findings from the laboratory examinations at the time of hospital admission. The cases presented lower median platelet, hemoglobin and hematocrit counts and higher median levels of creatine phosphokinase-CPK, lactate dehydrogenase-LDH, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase-GOT, urea and creatinine, with statistical significance.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Laboratory examinations of pregnant women hospitalized with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 associated with severe acute respiratory illness, who died (cases) or recovered (controls), State of São Paulo, 2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.t003

Table 4 presents the variables in the final multiple logistic regression model. Having had a previous health visit to a healthcare provider for the influenza episode before hospitalization was a risk factor for death, OR 7.93 (95% CI 2.19–28.69). Antiviral treatment was a protective factor for death when administered within the first 48 hours after the onset of symptoms, OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.05–0.50), and when administered 48 to 72 hours after the onset of symptoms, OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.87). The third trimester of gestation, which was a significant risk factor in univariate analysis, lost significance in the multiple analysis, OR 2.13 (95% CI 0.91–5.00), when antiviral treatment was included in the model. The proportion of women who did not receive any antiviral treatment was similar in the three trimesters of gestation (11.1, 11.1 and 12% respectively) and the proportion of those who received the treatment after 72 hours was higher in the 3^rd trimester (14.8%, 25.9% and 32%, respectively for the 1^st, 2^nd and 3^rd trimester of gestation.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Risk factors for death among pregnant women hospitalized with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, State of Sao Paulo, 2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.t004

As shown in Table 5, among the cases, 45.8% of pregnant women had live births, with one twin birth, and 54.1% of the women experienced fetal deaths, of which fetal deaths later (≥ 23 weeks) represented 65.4% of the total number of deaths. Among the controls, 13.5% delivered during hospitalization, with one twin birth. Regarding the neonatal outcome in this group, there were 7.7% fetal deaths and 92.3% live births. Considering the live births that occurred during hospitalization, in 100% of cases and in 75.0% of controls a cesarean delivery was performed. The distribution of gestational outcomes shows a concentration of miscarriages and premature births among cases compared to controls who delivered during hospitalization: 82.6% and 45.8%, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the 144 controls who were discharged before delivery and who completed a home interview, 100% had live births, 62.5% by cesarean delivery and 86.8% at term.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 5. Distribution of pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 associated with severe acute respiratory illness who died (cases) or recovered (controls), State of São Paulo, 2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.t005

Regarding the live births, among the cases, there was predominance of gestational age at birth between the 32^nd and 36^th weeks of pregnancy (65.2%), and among the controls who delivered during hospitalization, 54.2% occurred at 37 weeks and over (p = 0.003). Among the controls that gave birth after hospital discharge, 86.8% of births were full term (≥37^th week). Analyzing the weight of live births, there was a higher proportion of low birthweight (<2,500 g) among cases (73.9%) than among controls who gave birth during hospitalization (37.5%), p = 0.011. Considering control women who delivered after discharge, low birthweight occurred in only 6.3% of the births. During hospitalization, 8.7% (2 in 23; 28 and 38 days after birth) of the live births of cases and 4.2% (1 in 24; 12 days after birth) of live births of controls evolved to death after giving birth. None of the live births of control women who delivered after discharge evolved to death. The median gestational age, birth weight and Apgar score in the 1^st minute were significantly lower among cases than among controls who delivered during hospitalization. Among the cases, 73.7% of the newborns were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), contrasting to only 35.0% of newborns from controls who delivered during the hospitalization. When the weight of the newborns was compared with the gestational age, 27.3% of newborns from cases were classified as small for the gestational age, and 12.5% and 7.5% of those from controls who gave birth during and after hospitalization, respectively, as shown in Table 6.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 6. Distribution of neonatal outcomes (live birth) of pregnant women hospitalized with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 associated with severe acute respiratory illness who died (cases) or recovered (controls) according to weight, gestational age and Apgar, State of São Paulo, 2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.t006

Discussion

The case control design, including all reported deaths of hospitalized patients who presented with laboratory confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 with SARI in the State of São Paulo, and the random selection of four controls for each case, with the collection of hospital data and home interviews, allowed for the expansion of the analysis of risk factors for death. It was possible to evaluate the gestational and neonatal outcomes, including those of pregnant women who delivered after hospital discharge. The main results suggest that an early search for care, the training of physicians for the proper treatment of pregnant women, and early antiviral administration can be protective factors against death. Another noteworthy result was the presence of unfavorable neonatal outcomes, with a significant proportion of stillbirths and miscarriages, low birth weights and lower Apgar scores among pregnant women who died. After hospital discharge, the patients had a favorable neonatal outcome. Pre-eclampsia was present in six percent of women who evolved to death and in less than one percent of those who survived. Despite the fact that all women who died had the influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 infection as the main cause of death in their death certificate, we cannot rule out the possibility that pre-eclampsia may have contributed to their unfavourable outcome.

Age distribution and race were not associated with a risk of death in pregnant women, similar to results in other studies[9,10,11]. The third trimester of gestation lost its significance as risk factor for death in the multiple analyses, when antivirus treatment was included in the model. A higher proportion of women in the final period of gestation received the treatment after 72 hours of symptoms than those who were at earlier stages of gestation. A meta-analysis study showed that the third trimester of gestation was a risk factor for death (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48) for pandemic influenza, when compared with those in the first or second trimester [12]. Although the present study did not confirm the association with the third trimester of gestation, its result indicates that it is important to monitor pregnant women with influenza illness, with special attention during this trimester, for diagnosis and early treatment.

The pregnant women who had a previous health visit to a healthcare provider for the influenza episode before hospitalization had a higher risk of death. This increased risk could be an indication of difficulties in accessing hospitalization or lack of perception of the severity of the case by doctors or lack of recognition that, even in cases that are not serious, considering that pregnant women are in a high risk group for severity of the disease, early antiviral therapy should have been introduced. The median time between the first symptoms and hospitalization was twice as high among pregnant women who died. Similar results were found when patients in general with influenza during the pandemic were evaluated in São Paulo[17] and in Mexico [18]. These findings also reinforce the need for pregnant women to have access to health services, particularly hospitalization in serious cases. The training of physicians concerning the proper care for pregnant women and the need to start early treatment are as important as the early search for care.

The use of an antiviral medication was a protective factor death when administered within 72 hours of symptom onset. Several studies have shown an increased risk of death or worsening disease in pregnant women who started treatment late [10,11,19,20,21,22,23] and in patients in general [17,18,24,25,26,27,28,29].

Regarding the history of previous diseases, no differences in the presence of risk conditions for developing influenza-related complications were found between pregnant women who eventually died and those who recovered. However, surveillance showed a higher proportion of risk conditions among pregnant women who eventually died compared to those who survived [10]. A study in China showed that obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was a factor associated with mortality in patients with severe disease [9]. This result is in line with the current study. Although it was not possible to calculate BMI, a higher rate of obesity among the cases than among the controls was reported.

There were a higher proportion of cases with co-infections than controls, consistent with other reported results [17].

The patients who eventually died presented significant alterations in laboratory values when compared to controls. The alterations observed in CPK, LDH, platelets and creatinine were similar to those reported for patients in general [27,29,30,31,32]. In pregnant women, there was also a decrease in the number of red blood cells.

In relation to neonatal outcomes, there were a greater proportion of fetal deaths in patients who died than in controls that delivered either during hospitalization or after discharge. Among the live births in the cases, there was a greater proportion of low birth weight, gestational age less than 32 weeks, admitted to ICU, lower scores on the Apgar scale, when compared to the live births of controls that delivered during or after hospitalization. Similar results were reported in studies that evaluated pregnant women infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 compared to women of childbearing age without infection[33], pregnant women with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 with severe disease [9,20] or women who gave birth to live newborns during hospitalization [10,34]. Control women who delivered after discharge from the hospital had favorable outcomes in their offspring, with a median APGAR of 9 both in the 1^st and 5^th minutes of life. Considering all births in the State of São Paulo during 2009, according to the national system of live births-SINASC, 58% were delivered by cesarean, 9% were preterm birth (<37 weeks) and 9% had low birthweight (≤2500 g). In the control women of the study who gave birth after hospitalization, these proportions were also high (62.5%, 13.2% and 7.7%, respectively).

This study has limitations. Underreporting of SARI by health professionals as well as gaps in the SINAN may have occurred. The notification of influenza through a new viral subtype associated with SARI was initiated during the pandemic; consequently, the sensitivity may have varied with time. The quality of information from medical records can differ between hospitals. The use of standardized hospital and home questionnaires minimized these difficulties during data collection. Although all hospital reports were reviewed, we were not able to establish the roles of other factors, such as secondary infections or obstetric factors, which could have contributed to death in the cases. The results presented in this study indicate that early treatment can prevent unfavorable outcomes in pregnant women and in their offspring and reinforce the need for the proper training of doctors for the clinical management of pregnant women and early administration of antiviral treatment. These findings also support interventions in situations of future pandemics and seasonal influenza with the goals of preventive measures and the organization of health services for the appropriate clinical management of pregnant women.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Data Collection Form.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.s001

(DOC)

S1 Database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Sao Paulo State Secretary of Health, the Santa Casa de São Paulo Medical School for the collaboration in the preparation of the project. This study would not possible without the collaborations of the researchers and field coordinators, the Epidemiological Surveillance Center, the Disease Control Coordination, the Adolfo Lutz Institute, municipal departments of health for data collection. We would also like to thank all those who contributed to this study, especially Luiz Roberto Barradas Barata (in memoriam).

Citation: Ribeiro AF, Pellini ACG, Kitagawa BY, Marques D, Madalosso G, Fred J, et al. (2018) Severe influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in pregnant women and neonatal outcomes, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2009. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0194392. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194392

References

1. Harris JW. Influenza occurring in pregnant women. JAMA 1919. 72:978–980

2. Gremberg M, Jacobziner H, Parker J, Weisl BAG. Maternal mortality in the epidemic of Asian influenza, New York City, 1957. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958; 76: 897–902. pmid:13583035

3. Jamieson DJ, Theiler RN, Rasmussen SA. Emerging infectious and pregnancy. Emerg Infec Dis 2006; 12:1638–43.

4. World Health Organization, Pandemic (H1N1) 2009- World now at the start of 2009 influenza pandemic. [acesso em 20 maio 2010].http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html.

5. Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Rasmussen SA,Williams JL, Swerdlow DL, Biggerstaff DL, et al. H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet. 2009; 8:374(9688):451–8. pmid:19643469

6. World Health Organization Vaccines against influenza WHO position paper–November 2012. Wkly Epidemiol Record 2012; 87:461–76.

7. Louie JK, Acosta M, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, California Pandemic (H1N1) Working Group. Severe 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women in California. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:27–35. pmid:20032319

8. Mosby LG, Rasmusse AS, Jamieson DJ. 2009 Pandemic influenza in pregnant: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:10–8.

9. Zhang PJ, Li Xl, Cao B, Yang SG, Liang L, Gu L, et al. Clinical features and risk factors for severe and critical pregnant women with 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza infection in China. BMC Infectious Diseases 2012;12:1–9.

10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Maternal and infant outcomes among severally ill pregnant and postpartum women with 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1)–United States, April 2009-August 2010, Sept 9, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:1193–96. pmid:21900872

11. Ellington SR, Hartman LK, Acosta M, Martinez-Romo M, Rubinson L, Jamieson DJ, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) in 71 critically ill pregnant women in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:S21–30. pmid:21514554

12. Mertz D, Kim TH, Johnstone J, Lam PP, Science M, Kuster SP, et al. Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;347:2–15.

13. Hansen C, Desai S, Bredfeldt C, Cheetham C, Gallagher M, Li DK, et al. A large, population-based study of 2009 pandemic influenza A virus subtype H1N1 infection diagnosis during pregnancy and outcomes for mothers and neonates. JID 2012;206:1260–68. pmid:22859826

14. Pan American Health Organization—World Health Organization. Operational Guidelines for Intensified National SARI Surveillance. Accessed 20 May 2011. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=17125&Itemid=270&lang=en

15. Fukasawa LO, Silva DB, Santos FCP, Oba IT, Araujo AC, Gonçalves MG, et al. Implantação e otimização da PCR em tempo real para o diagnóstico de influenza A(H1N1) no Instituto Adolfo Lutz e perspectiva para 2010. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz. 2010; 69(1): 131–5

16. Occupational Safety and Health Act. Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for an Influenza Pandemic.OSHA 3327-05R. http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3327pandemic.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2011

17. Ribeiro AF, Pellini ACG, Kitagawa BY, Marques D, Madalosso G, Fred J, et al. Risk Factors for Death from Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, State of São Paulo, Brazil, 2009. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0118772. pmid:25774804

18. Chowell G, Viboud C, Simonsen L, Miller M, Echevarria-Zuno S, González-León M, et al. Impact of antiviral treatment and hospital admission delay on risk of death associated with 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic influenza in Mexico. BMC Infect Dis 2012;12:1–11.

19. Siston AM, Rasmuesen SA, Honein MA, Fry Am, Seib K, Callaghan WM, et al. Pandemic 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA 2010; 303:1517–25. pmid:20407061

20. Crenga AA, Johnson TF, Graitcer SB, Al-Samarrai T, Schwarz AG, Chu SY, et al. Severity of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in Pregnant women. Obst Gynecol 2010; 115:717–26.

21. Dubar G, Azria E, Tesnière A, Dupont H, Le Ray C, Baugnon T, et al. French experience of 2009 A:H1N1v influenza in pregnant women. Plos One 2010;5:1–9.

22. Lenzi L, Pontarolo R. Evaluation of pregnancy as a risk factor in the outcomes of influenza A (H1N1)/2009 in women of childbearing age. Cad Saude Publica. 2012;28:395–9. pmid:22331165

23. Varner MW, Rice MM, Anderson B, Tolosa JE, Sheffield J, Spong CY, et al. Influenza-like illness in hospitalized pregnant and postpartum women during the 2009–2010 H1N1 pandemic. Obstet Gynecol 2011;18:593–600.

24. Skarbinski J, Jain S, Bramley A, Lee EJ, Huang J, Kirchke D, et al. Hospitalized patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus Infection in the United States—September-October 2009. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:S50–S59. pmid:21342900

25. Fuhrman C, Bonmarin I, Paty AC, Duport N, Chiron E, Lucas E, et al. Severe Hospitalised 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Cases in France, 1 july-15 November 2009. Euro Surveill 2010;15;17–21.

26. Jain S, Kamimoto L, Bramley AM, Schmitz AM, Benoit SP, Louie J, et al. Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States, April-June 2009. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1935–44. pmid:19815859

27. Dominguéz-Cherit G, Lapinsky SE, Macias AE, Pinto R, Espinoza-Perez L, de la Torre A, etal. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. JAMA 2009;302:1880–7. pmid:19822626

28. Louie JK, Acosta M, Winter K, Jean C, Gavali S, Schechter R, et al. Factors associated with death or hospitalization due to pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in California. JAMA 2009;302:1896–1902. pmid:19887665

29. Lee EH, Wu C, Lee EU, Stoute A, Hanson H, Cook HA, et al. Fatalities associated with the 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus in New York City. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:1498–1504. pmid:20420514

30. Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, Hernandez M, Quinõnes-Falconi F, Bautista E, et al. Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med 2009;361:680–9. pmid:19564631

31. Kumar A, Zarychanski R, Pinto R,Cook DJ, Marchall J, Lacroix J, et al. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA 2009, 302:1872–79. pmid:19822627

32. Gonzalez-Vélez AE, Diaz-Agero CP, Robusteillo-Rodela A, Cornejo-Gutiérrez AM, Pita-López MJ, Oliva-Iñiguez L, et al. Factores asociados a ingreso en unidad de cuidados intensivos en pacientes hospitalizados por influenza pandémica A/H1N1 2009. Medicina Intensive 2011;35:463–9.

33. Doyle TJ, Goodin K, Hamilton JJ. Maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) illness in Florida, 2009–2010: A population-based cohort study. Plos one 2013; 8:1–12.

34. The ANZIC influenza investigators and Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System. Critical illness due to 2009 A/H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women population based cohort study. BMJ 2010; 340:c1279. pmid:20299694