It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Energy-transport effects can alter the structure that develops as a supernova evolves into a supernova remnant. The Rayleigh–Taylor instability is thought to produce structure at the interface between the stellar ejecta and the circumstellar matter, based on simple models and hydrodynamic simulations. Here we report experimental results from the National Ignition Facility to explore how large energy fluxes, which are present in supernovae, affect this structure. We observed a reduction in Rayleigh–Taylor growth. In analyzing the comparison with supernova SN1993J, a Type II supernova, we found that the energy fluxes produced by heat conduction appear to be larger than the radiative energy fluxes, and large enough to have dramatic consequences. No reported astrophysical simulations have included radiation and heat conduction self-consistently in modeling supernova remnants and these dynamics should be noted in the understanding of young supernova remnants.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
3 Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
4 Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er-Sheva, Israel; Nuclear Research Center Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
5 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
6 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
7 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Nuclear Research Center Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
8 General Atomics, San Diego, California, USA
9 Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
10 Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada