Introduction
Tropospheric ozone (O3) is a gaseous air pollutant and a powerful oxidant generated from photochemical reactions involving nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds (Finlayson‐Pitts and Pitts ). Once inhaled into the lungs, O3 rapidly reacts with proteins and unsaturated fatty acids in the airway surface liquid to initiate a cascade of events that results in lung injury, pulmonary inflammation, and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) (United States Environmental Protection Agency, ). O3‐induced lung injury is characterized, in part, by desquamation of airway epithelial cells and hyperpermeability of the alveolar‐capillary membrane (Scheel et al. ; Bhalla et al. ). Pulmonary inflammation induced by exposure to O3 is typified by increased expression of inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)‐1α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐17A, keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)‐2, osteopontin, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)] in lung tissue and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and by migration of macrophages and neutrophils to air spaces (Park et al. ; Johnston et al. ,b; Barreno et al. ; Kasahara et al. ; Razvi et al. ). O3 also causes AHR to nonspecific bronchoconstrictors, which is a phenomenon dependent on many of the inflammatory cytokines whose expression is induced by O3 (Golden et al. ; Seltzer et al. ; Foster et al. ; Cho et al. ; Shore et al. ; Park et al. ; Johnston et al. ; Lu et al. ; Barreno et al. ).
Elevations in ambient O3 increase hospitalizations for individuals with respiratory disease (Medina‐Ramón et al. ; Silverman and Ito ). O3 also disproportionally increases mortality among the elderly and among people with respiratory disease (Bell et al. ; Hao et al. ). Because these vulnerable subpopulations continue to increase in the United States (U.S.) and because 51% of the U.S. population lives in areas with unhealthy levels of O3 in ambient air (Administration on Aging; Wroe et al. ; Zhang et al. ; American Lung Association, ), a significant number of individuals within these subpopulations are susceptible to the harmful effects of O3. Thus, to mitigate or prevent O3‐induced lung dysfunction and even possible death in vulnerable individuals, it is imperative to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying O3‐induced pulmonary pathology.
Ozone increases pulmonary expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)‐1, a single‐chain 50 kDa glycoprotein (van Mourik et al. ; Katre et al. ; Kodavanti et al. ). However, the functional consequences of this phenomenon are not presently known. PAI‐1 is a member of the serpin superfamily of protease inhibitors and is expressed by a number of cells, including adipocytes, endothelial cells, epithelial cells, fibroblasts, mast cells, and platelets (van Hinsbergh et al. ; Gerwin et al. ; Konkle et al. ; Samad et al. ; Samad and Loskutoff ; Cho et al. ; Heit et al. ). PAI‐1 is the major physiological inhibitor of tissue‐type plasminogen activator (t‐PA) and urokinase‐type plasminogen activator (u‐PA) (Van De Craen et al. ). Because t‐PA and u‐PA activate the fibrinolytic system by catalyzing the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, PAI‐1 is commonly regarded as the primary inhibitor of fibrinolysis (Flemmig and Melzig ; Van De Craen et al. ). Structurally, PAI‐1 can exist in several confirmations, including active, latent, and in complex with either t‐PA or u‐PA (Munch et al. ; Aertgeerts et al. ; Grebenschikov et al. ; Van De Craen et al. ). The active form of PAI‐1 is capable of forming covalent complexes with t‐PA or u‐PA, and thus, inhibit the ability of t‐PA and u‐PA to initiate the fibrinolysis cascade (Van De Craen et al. ). The latent form of PAI‐1 appears to have no functional capability (Van De Craen et al. ).
In addition to inhibiting fibrinolysis, PAI‐1 exerts other biological effects that suggest PAI‐1 may contribute to the severity of the pathological features observed in the lung following acute exposure to O3. First, in several diverse animal models of lung disease, PAI‐1 is necessary for migration of macrophages and neutrophils to air spaces, development of pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability, and manifestation of AHR (Arndt et al. , ; Kuramoto et al. ; Goolaerts et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Lee et al. ; Bhandary et al. ; Tezuka et al. ; Liu et al. ), which are all pathological features induced by inhalation of O3 (Bhalla et al. ; Foster et al. ; Johnston et al. ; Razvi et al. ). Second, within the lung, PAI‐1 is necessary for the maximal expression of specific cytokines (IL‐6, KC, MIP‐2, and TNF) and chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) receptor 2 (CXCR2) (Renckens et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Tiwari et al. ), the receptor for KC and MIP‐2 (Konrad and Reutershan ). CXCR2 and these aforementioned cytokines elicit desquamation of airway epithelial cells, migration of neutrophils to air spaces, and/or AHR following O3 exposure (Cho et al. ; Shore et al. ; Johnston et al. ,b; Lang et al. ). Third, expression of PAI‐1 in the lung is increased by c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (Arndt et al. ), which contributes to O3‐induced pulmonary inflammation and O3‐induced AHR (Williams et al. ). Given these observations, we hypothesized that PAI‐1 contributes to the severity of pulmonary pathological features induced by acute exposure to O3.
To test our hypothesis, wild‐type mice and mice genetically deficient in PAI‐1 (PAI‐1‐deficient mice) were acutely exposed to either filtered room air (air) or O3 [2 parts/million (ppm)] for 3 h. Four and twenty‐four hours following cessation of exposure, we assessed indices of lung injury and pulmonary inflammation in wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice by biochemically or histologically analyzing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) supernatants and cell differentials and formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded lung sections. The forced oscillation technique was used to assess airway responsiveness to aerosolized acetyl‐β‐methylcholine chloride (methacholine) in wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice 24 h following cessation of exposure. Consistent with other investigators (Katre et al. ; Kodavanti et al. ), our data demonstrate that O3 increases PAI‐1 in the lungs. However, our data also reveal that PAI‐1 does not functionally contribute to any aspect of the pulmonary pathology induced by acute exposure to O3.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Mice homozygous for a null mutation in the gene encoding PAI‐1 (PAI‐1‐deficient mice) were generated via homologous recombination as previously described by Carmeliet et al. (Carmeliet et al. ). Female PAI‐1‐deficient mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or generated in a multi‐species modified barrier animal care facility at McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX) from either mating pairs or trios of PAI‐1‐deficient mice that were also purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Because PAI‐1‐deficient mice were backcrossed into a C57BL/6J background for 10 generations (The Jackson Laboratory), age‐matched female C57BL/6J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and used as wild‐type controls. The care and use of all animals in this study adhered to the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) while each of the experimental protocols used in this study were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX).
Protocol
A number of experiments were performed in this study that required three separate cohorts of wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice. In the first cohort, mice were euthanized 4 or 24 h following cessation of a 3 h exposure to either air or O3 (2 ppm). Blood and BALF were subsequently obtained from these animals. Mice in the second cohort were euthanized 24 h following cessation of a 3 h exposure to either air or O3 (2 ppm). Afterwards, blood was collected from each animal and the lungs fixed in situ and removed from the thoracic cavity of the animal en bloc. In the third cohort, the animals were anesthetized 24 h following cessation of a 3 h exposure to either air or O3 (2 ppm), and airway responsiveness to aerosolized methacholine was measured.
Air and O3 exposure
Conscious mice were individually placed into one of eight cells of a stainless steel wire mesh cage (Marlin Steel Wire Products LLC, Baltimore, MD) that was subsequently placed inside a powder‐coated aluminum exposure chamber with a Plexiglas® door (Teague Enterprises; Woodland, CA). Once the Plexiglas® door of the chamber was securely closed, the animals were exposed to either air or O3 (2 ppm) for 3 h. After the 3 h exposure was complete, the animals were placed into the same micro‐isolator cage (TECNIPLAST S.p.A.; Buguggiate, Varese, Italy) that they occupied prior to air or O3 exposure. Once the mice were returned to the micro‐isolator cage, they had access to food and water ad libitum until the experimental procedures described below were performed 4 h and/or 24 h following cessation of exposure. For greater details with regard to air and O3 exposures, please refer to a prior publication from our laboratory (Razvi et al. ).
Blood withdrawal
Mice in the first and second cohorts were euthanized with an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of pentobarbital sodium (200 mg/kg; Vortech Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.; Dearborn, MI). Once each animal was deeply anesthetized, a median thoracotomy was performed to expose the heart and lungs in situ. The right ventricle of the heart was punctured with a 25‐gauge needle attached to a 1 mL syringe, and blood was slowly withdrawn from the heart. Blood was removed from the heart, and by extension, the pulmonary circulation, in order to prevent blood from contaminating the BALF and interfering with the immunohistochemical staining of lung tissue.
BAL
A BAL was performed on each animal within the first cohort after blood was withdrawn from the heart. BALF was subsequently collected, processed, and stored until needed. In addition, the total number of BALF cells was enumerated, and a differential count of BALF cells was performed. Approximately 80% of the instilled lavage buffer was retrieved from each animal, and there was no effect of genotype or exposure on the volume of lavage buffer that was retrieved. A detailed description of the collection, processing, and storage of BALF and of the enumeration of total BALF cells and differentials have been previously described by our laboratory (Razvi et al. ). Finally, within each genotype, there were no significant differences between the BALF indices measured at four as compared to 24 h following cessation of exposure to air. Thus, data for all air‐exposed and genotype‐matched mice were pooled (data not shown).
Immunoassays and protein quantification
The concentration of BALF IL‐6, KC, MIP‐2, and total and active PAI‐1 were measured using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN for IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 and Molecular Innovations, Inc., Novi, MI for total and active PAI‐1) according to the manufacturer's instructions. BALF protein was quantified using the Bradford protein assay as previously described by Bradford (); Razvi et al. ().
Lung histology and immunohistochemistry
After blood was withdrawn from the heart of each animal within the second cohort, the heart and entire circulation were flushed with 10 mL of precooled phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). Subsequently, the lungs were fixed in situ with 10% phosphate‐buffered formalin (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) at a pressure of 25 cm H2O. Lungs were then dehydrated and paraffin‐embedded. Sections were cut from paraffin‐embedded lungs and mounted onto glass microscope slides. Afterwards, the sections were either stained with hematoxylin and eosin or an anti‐mouse PAI‐1 polyclonal antibody (1 μg/mL; Abcam plc., Cambridge, MA) and examined via bright‐field microscopy by a veterinary pathologist according to previously published procedures (Dahm et al. ; Razvi et al. ). Peribronchiolar and perivascular inflammation were also scored in hematoxylin‐ and eosin‐stained lung sections as previously described (Dahm et al. ; Razvi et al. ).
Measurement of respiratory system responsiveness to methacholine
Mice in the third cohort were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg, i.p.; Oak Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lake Forest, IL) and xylazine hydrochloride (7 mg/kg, i.p.; Vedco Inc., St. Joseph, MO), instrumented for mechanical ventilation, and ventilated at a frequency of 2.5 Hz, a tidal volume of 0.3 mL, and a positive end‐expiratory pressure of 3 cm H2O using a specialized ventilator that is capable of measuring indices of respiratory system mechanics using the forced oscillation technique (flexiVent; SCIREQ Scientific Respiratory Equipment Inc.; Montréal, Québec, Canada) (Schuessler and Bates ). The flexiVent was used in this study to measure responses to aerosolized PBS followed by increasing doses of aerosolized methacholine (0.1–100 mg/mL) to determine respiratory system resistance (RRS). For each animal in the third cohort, we also calculated the dose of methacholine required to double RRS (ED200RRS). The ED200RRS was calculated by logarithmic‐linear interpolation between the doses abutting the point at which RRS was exactly 200% of the baseline RRS value, which was defined as the RRS value obtained following PBS administration. All measurements were made in animals with a closed chest. For a more detailed description of the methods we used to measure respiratory system resistance to methacholine in this study, please refer to Razvi et al. ().
Statistical analyses of data
The effect of genotype (wild‐type or PAI‐1‐deficient) and exposure (air or O3) on BALF indices, peribronchiolar and perivascular inflammation, baseline RRS, and the logarithm of ED200RRS were assessed by a two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed data or by a Kruskal–Wallis one‐way ANOVA for non‐normally distributed data. Depending on whether the data were normally or non‐normally distributed, the Fisher's least significant difference test or the Conover‐Iman test with a Bonferroni adjustment, respectively, were used for post hoc analyses to determine the significance of differences between groups. Statistical analysis of the repeated measures comprising the methacholine dose–response curves was completed using the area under the curve (AUC) analysis with respect to increased response compared with the response following PBS administration. AUC analysis was performed using R (Version 2.15.3) (R Core Team ). Stata 12 was used for all other statistical analyses (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Unless otherwise noted, the results are expressed as the mean ± the standard error of the mean. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Effect of PAI‐1 deficiency and O3 on BALF total and active PAI‐1
Using commercially available immunoassays (Molecular Innovations, Inc.), we measured the concentration of total and active PAI‐1 in BALF obtained from wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice 4 and 24 h following cessation of exposure to either air or O3 (Fig. ). The total PAI‐1 immunoassay detects active and latent PAI‐1 and PAI‐1 in complex with t‐PA (David S. Ginsberg, M.S., pers. comm., of Molecular Innovations, Inc.). The total PAI‐1 immunoassay cannot determine the precise proportion of each PAI‐1 confirmation present in BALF. However, regardless of its confirmation, PAI‐1 was detectable in BALF obtained from wild‐type mice exposed to air (Fig. A). Four and twenty‐four hours following cessation of exposure to O3, there were significant twofold and fivefold increases, respectively, in BALF total PAI‐1 (Fig. A). We did attempt to measure total PAI‐1 in BALF of air‐ or O3‐exposed PAI‐1‐deficient mice using the aforementioned immunoassay, yet PAI‐1 was not detectable in any BALF obtained from PAI‐1‐deficient mice. We also measured the amount of active PAI‐1 in BALF obtained from wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice exposed to air or O3 (Fig. B), and the results were qualitatively similar to those obtained for total PAI‐1. Active PAI‐1 comprised less than two percent of the total PAI‐1 present in BALF.
Immunostaining of PAI‐1 in lungs of air‐ or O3‐exposed wild‐type mice
Immunohistochemistry was used to identify the cells in the lungs of wild‐type mice that express PAI‐1 24 h following exposure to either air or O3 (Fig. ). We chose to examine PAI‐1 immunostaining in the lungs of wild‐type mice 24 h following cessation of exposure because we observed the greatest increase in BALF PAI‐1 by O3 at this time (Fig. ). As shown in Figure A, the apical cytoplasm of bronchiolar epithelial cells in air‐exposed wild‐type mice was strongly positive for PAI‐1. In contrast to the greater amount of PAI‐1 detected in BALF of wild‐type mice exposed to O3 (Fig. ), the intensity of PAI‐1 immunostaining in the bronchiolar epithelium was less consistent and much weaker in wild‐type mice exposed to O3 as compared to air (Fig. B).
Effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on pulmonary inflammation induced by O3
Plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 can regulate pulmonary expression of IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2, which are necessary for desquamation of airway epithelial cells, migration of neutrophils to air spaces, and/or development of AHR following acute exposure to O3 (Johnston et al. ,b; Renckens et al. ; Lang et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Tiwari et al. ). In addition, PAI‐1 regulates migration of macrophages to air spaces, which is a characteristic feature of O3‐induced pulmonary pathology (Bhandary et al. ; Razvi et al. ). Therefore, we measured BALF IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 and enumerated the number of BALF macrophages and neutrophils 4 and 24 h following cessation of exposure to air or O3 in order to assess the effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on development of O3‐induced pulmonary inflammation (Fig. ). In air‐exposed wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice, IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 were not detectable in BALF (Fig. A–C). Four hours following cessation of exposure to O3, IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 were significantly increased in BALF of wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice (Fig. A–C). However, we observed no genotype‐related differences in any of these cytokines at this time interval. Twenty‐four hours following cessation of exposure to O3, BALF IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 in wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice still remained higher than those levels observed in genotype‐matched air‐exposed controls (Fig. A–C). With the exception of MIP‐2, which was significantly lower in PAI‐1‐deficient as compared to wild‐type mice, there were no other genotype‐related differences in cytokine levels 24 h following cessation of exposure to O3 (Fig. A–C).
Compared to genotype‐matched air‐exposed mice, there was a significant decrease in the number of BALF macrophages 4 h following O3 exposure but a significant increase in the number of BALF macrophages at 24 h following O3 exposure (Fig. D). However, we observed no genotype‐related differences in the number of BALF macrophages following air or O3 exposure. Irrespective of whether wild‐type or PAI‐1‐deficient mice were examined 4 or 24 h following cessation of exposure to O3, O3 caused a significant increase in the number of BALF neutrophils in both genotypes (Fig. E). However, there were no genotype‐related differences in the number of BALF neutrophils following air or O3 exposure.
To further assess pulmonary inflammation in wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice, we scored peribronchiolar and perivascular inflammation in hematoxylin‐ and eosin‐stained lung sections (Fig. and data not shown). Since the number of BALF macrophages and neutrophils were highest at 24 h following cessation of exposure to O3 (Fig. D and E), we choose this time interval to assess peribronchiolar and perivascular inflammation. No inflammatory lesions were present in the lungs of air‐exposed wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice (Fig. A, B, and E). In mice of both genotypes, O3 caused mild, but significant, perivascular inflammation characterized by multifocal infiltrations of mononuclear cells and neutrophils (Fig. C–E). However, there were no genotype‐related differences in perivascular inflammation scores between wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice (Fig. E). No peribronchiolar inflammation was present in the lungs of O3‐exposed wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice (data not shown).
Effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on lung injury induced by O3
Ozone causes lung injury characterized by pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability and desquamation of airway epithelial cells (Scheel et al. ; Bhalla et al. ). In response to injury, PAI‐1 regulates pulmonary vascular permeability and repair of alveolar epithelial cells (Lazar et al. ; Goolaerts et al. ). Thus, we measured BALF protein, which is an index of pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability (Alpert et al. ), and enumerated the number of BALF epithelial cells (Fig. ). In both genotypes, O3 caused a significant increase in BALF protein 4 and 24 h following cessation of exposure when compared to genotype‐matched air‐exposed controls (Fig. A). However, no genotype‐related differences in BALF protein were observed at any time interval. Similar observations were made for BALF epithelial cells (Fig. B).
Effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on O3‐induced AHR
In Table , we report RRS values at baseline and values for ED200RRS that were obtained from wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice 24 h following cessation of exposure to either air or O3. Baseline RRS values were not different between wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice following exposure to air. O3 significantly increased baseline RRS in mice of both genotypes (Table and Fig. ). However, RRS values at baseline were not different between wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice following O3 exposure (Table ).
Respiratory system resistance at baseline and effective dose of methacholine necessary to cause a 200% increase in baseline RRS for wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice exposed to filtered room air or ozoneGenotype (Exposure) | RRS (cm H2O/mL/sec) | ED200RRS (mg/mL) (95% Confidence interval) |
Wild‐type (Air) | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 6.8 (4.0–11.5) |
PAI‐1‐Deficient (Air) | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 6.1 (4.2–8.9) |
Wild‐type (O3) | 0.73 ± 0.03* | 2.2* (1.0–4.8) |
PAI‐1‐Deficient (O3) | 0.73 ± 0.03* | 3.1 (1.4–7.0) |
Results are expressed as the mean ± the standard error of the mean (RRS, respiratory system resistance) or mean and 95% confidence interval (ED200RRS, effective dose of methacholine necessary to cause a 200% increase in baseline RRS) from 6 to 9 mice in each group. RRS measurements at baseline were made following the administration of phosphate‐buffered saline. RRS at baseline and ED200RRS were measured or calculated, respectively, 24 h following cessation of exposure to filtered room air (air) or ozone (O3; 2 ppm) for 3 h. *P < 0.05 compared to genotype‐matched mice exposed to air.
In air‐exposed wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice, methacholine caused significant increases in RRS when compared to RRS measurements obtained following PBS administration. However, no differences in either responses to methacholine for RRS or measurements of ED200RRS were observed between air‐exposed wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice (Fig. and Table ). Methacholine also significantly increased RRS in O3‐exposed mice that were independent of genotype (Fig. ). Dose–response curves to methacholine in O3‐exposed mice were shifted to the left when compared to genotype‐matched air‐exposed controls, a phenomenon demonstrated by a reduction in ED200RRS values for mice of both genotypes following O3 exposure (Table ). However, a significant difference only existed between ED200RRS values for air‐ and O3‐exposed wild‐type mice. Nevertheless, responses to methacholine for RRS were significantly greater in both O3‐exposed wild‐type mice and O3‐exposed PAI‐1‐deficient mice when compared to genotype‐matched air‐exposed controls. No genotype‐related differences in responses to methacholine for RRS existed following O3 exposure.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, we demonstrate for the first time that acute exposure to O3 increases total and active PAI‐1 in the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs (Fig. ). In numerous animal models of lung injury, PAI‐1 is necessary for manifestation of many sequelae induced by acute exposure to O3, including migration of macrophages and neutrophils to air spaces, hyperpermeability of the alveolar‐capillary membrane, and AHR (Arndt et al. , ; Kuramoto et al. ; Goolaerts et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Lee et al. ; Bhandary et al. ; Razvi et al. ; Tezuka et al. ; Liu et al. ). However, our results demonstrate that PAI‐1 does not contribute to the development of these aforementioned sequelae consequent to acute exposure to O3 (Figs. ‐6).
Katre et al. () and Kodavanti et al. () reported that cyclic exposure to O3 increased PAI‐1 protein and mRNA expression, respectively, in rodent lung tissue. Consistent with these observations, we report that acute exposure to O3 increased BALF total and active PAI‐1 by five‐ and twelve‐fold, respectively (Fig. ). Expression of PAI‐1 in the lungs is also increased via acid aspiration, antigen‐induced pulmonary injury, cigarette smoke, gram‐negative bacteria, hyperoxia, and mechanical ventilation with high tidal volumes (Barazzone et al. ; Oh et al. ; Kelly et al. ; Renckens et al. ; Allen et al. ; Kuramoto et al. ; Goolaerts et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Lee et al. ; Shetty et al. ; Tezuka et al. ). Therefore, increases in pulmonary expression of PAI‐1 subsequent to lung injury appear to be a nonspecific response, yet it is uncertain whether this phenomenon is beneficial or unfavorable. Indeed, PAI‐1 has been demonstrated to elicit both advantageous and adverse effects. For example, PAI‐1 facilitates the repair of lesions in airway and renal epithelial cells (Providence et al. ; Stevens et al. ). Alternatively, PAI‐1 can induce expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, migration of inflammatory leukocytes, and excessive deposition of collagen within the extracellular matrix (Eitzman et al. ; Bhandary et al. ; Tiwari et al. ). Thus, depending on the inciting stimulus, increases in PAI‐1 expression following lung injury may be beneficial, disadvantageous, or both.
In the absence of any inciting stimulus, expression of PAI‐1 mRNA within the lungs of C57BL/6 mice is localized to the airway and alveolar epithelium and pulmonary endothelial cells (Senoo et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ). Consistent with these observations, the apical cytoplasm of bronchiolar epithelial cells of air‐exposed wild‐type mice were strongly positive for PAI‐1 (Fig. A). Thus, airway epithelial cells are probably the most significant source of PAI‐1 that is found in the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs of air‐exposed wild‐type mice (Fig. ). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that PAI‐1 detected in BALF of these animals is derived from other cell types within the lung that also express PAI‐1, including alveolar epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and pulmonary endothelial cells (Samad et al. ; Senoo et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ). It is also plausible that a fraction of PAI‐1 found in BALF is derived from the circulating blood.
Lung injury caused by LPS or mechanical ventilation with high tidal volumes leads to concomitant increases in BALF and lung tissue PAI‐1 (Arndt et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ). However, we observed opposing effects of O3 on BALF and lung tissue PAI‐1 in wild‐type mice. Despite the significant increase in BALF PAI‐1 induced by acute exposure to O3 (Fig. ), PAI‐1 immunostaining was much weaker and more inconsistent within bronchiolar epithelial cells of O3‐ as compared to air‐exposed wild‐type mice (Fig. ). These observations suggest that one or more phenomena may be occurring with regard to PAI‐1 expression in the airway epithelium following O3 exposure. First, O3 down‐regulates expression of PAI‐1 in airway epithelial cells. However, this scenario is questionable since previous reports demonstrate that O3 and other stimuli that cause lung injury, including antigen, cigarette smoke, gram‐negative bacteria, hyperoxia, and LPS, increase PAI‐1 expression in lung tissue (Barazzone et al. ; Oh et al. ; Arndt et al. ; Renckens et al. ; Katre et al. ; Kodavanti et al. ; Shetty et al. ). Second, O3 causes PAI‐1 release from airway epithelial cells at a rate greater than the airway epithelium can translate and/or transcribe PAI‐1 de novo following O3 exposure. This second scenario is more probable given the significant increase in BALF PAI‐1 caused by O3 exposure in wild‐type mice (Fig. ). Nevertheless, the data that we currently present do not allow us to exclude the possibility that O3 actually suppresses PAI‐1 expression in the airway epithelium.
Plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 has been previously shown to participate in inflammatory processes that arise as a result of lung injury by regulating expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and migration of inflammatory leukocytes. For example, Tiwari et al. () report that PAI‐1 is necessary for maximal expression of KC and MIP‐2 following 20 weeks of exposure to cigarette smoke. In contrast, Wolthuis et al. () demonstrate that PAI‐1 is necessary for the down‐regulation of IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 in response to ventilator‐induced lung injury. Similarly, Renckens et al. (Renckens et al. ) report that PAI‐1 suppresses pulmonary expression of IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 in mice intranasally inoculated with Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nevertheless, within this same report, Renckens et al. () demonstrate that adenovirus‐mediated transfer of the PAI‐1 gene into the lungs of healthy mice increases expression of IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2. Based on the ability of PAI‐1 to regulate expression of IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 in other animal models of lung disease, we hypothesized that PAI‐1 would regulate expression of these same cytokines following acute exposure to O3. Although O3 did increase BALF IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 in wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice (Fig. A–C), we did not observe, for the most part, any genotype‐related differences in any of these cytokines 4 or 24 h following cessation of exposure to O3. BALF MIP‐2, however, was significantly lower in PAI‐1‐deficient as compared to wild‐type mice 24 h following cessation of exposure to O3 (Fig. C). While statistically significant, we do not believe the decrease in BALF MIP‐2 observed in PAI‐1‐deficient mice is of any biological significance. We draw this conclusion based on our previously published data demonstrating the necessity of CXCR2, the receptor for KC and MIP‐2, for maximal neutrophil migration to the air spaces and airway responsiveness to methacholine following acute exposure to O3 (Johnston et al. ; Konrad and Reutershan ). Thus, given that no genotype‐related differences in either the number of BALF neutrophils or airway responsiveness to methacholine were observed 24 h following cessation of O3 exposure (Figs. E and ), we conclude that the statistically significant reduction in BALF MIP‐2 in PAI‐1‐deficient mice at this time interval is of no biological importance.
In addition to regulating expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, PAI‐1 regulates migration of inflammatory leukocytes to the lungs in response to lung injury. To that end, Bhandary et al. () demonstrate that PAI‐1 is necessary for migration of macrophages to the air spaces following exposure to cigarette smoke. Furthermore, PAI‐1 is also required for the maximal migration of neutrophils to air spaces of mice exposed to cigarette smoke, gram‐negative bacteria, or LPS or mice mechanically ventilated with high tidal volumes (Arndt et al. , ; Goolaerts et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Bhandary et al. ). Because PAI‐1 regulates migration of macrophages and neutrophils to air spaces following lung injury and because O3‐induced pulmonary inflammation is characterized, in part, by migration of macrophages and neutrophils to air spaces (Arndt et al. , ; Johnston et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Bhandary et al. ; Razvi et al. ), we hypothesized that macrophage and neutrophil migration to air spaces following exposure to O3 would be decreased in PAI‐1‐deficient mice. However, our data demonstrate that PAI‐1 deficiency had no effect on either the number of BALF macrophages and neutrophils (Fig. C and D) or perivascular inflammation in the lung (Fig. ). Because BALF IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 were mostly unaffected by PAI‐1 deficiency following O3 exposure and because IL‐6, KC, and MIP‐2 are necessary for maximal neutrophil migration to air spaces following O3 exposure (Johnston et al. ,b; Lang et al. ), we were not surprised that the number of BALF neutrophils were not different between wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice following O3 exposure (Fig. ). Although our data with regard to the effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on macrophage and neutrophil recruitment to the lungs are inconsistent with the majority of studies examining the contribution of PAI‐1 to these phenomena within the lungs (Arndt et al. , ; Goolaerts et al. ; Wolthuis et al. ; Bhandary et al. ), there are reports demonstrating that PAI‐1 has no effect on macrophage and neutrophil migration to the lungs following pulmonary injury (Rijneveld et al. ; Poggi et al. ; Allen et al. ). Thus, PAI‐1 is not always essential for inflammatory leukocyte recruitment to air spaces in response to lung injury.
Features of O3‐induced lung injury, including pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability that is characterized by an increase in BALF protein and airway epithelial cell desquamation, were not different between wild‐type and PAI‐1‐deficient mice, 4 and 24 h following acute exposure to O3 [Fig. and (Scheel et al. ; Alpert et al. ; Bhalla et al. )]. To the best of our knowledge, there have been only two studies examining the effect of PAI‐1 on the development of pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability (Barazzone et al. ; Goolaerts et al. ). In the study by Goolaerts et al. (), PAI‐1 facilitated the development of pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability in response to the intratracheal installation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa while Barazzone et al. () reported that genetic deficiency of PAI‐1 failed to have an effect on pulmonary vascular permeability following 90 h of exposure to hyperoxia. PAI‐1 deficiency also failed to have any an effect on desquamation of airway epithelial cells 4 or 24 h following cessation of exposure to O3 (Fig. B). IL‐6 and CXCR2, the receptor for KC and MIP‐2, promote desquamation of airway epithelial cells following acute exposure to O3 (Johnston et al. ; Lang et al. ; Konrad and Reutershan ). Because each of these cytokines were primarily unaffected in PAI‐1‐deficient mice following exposure to O3, it is not unexpected that PAI‐1 deficiency failed to have any impact on the desquamation of airway epithelial cells. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PAI‐1 has no effect on classic indices of lung injury induced by exposure to O3.
There was also no effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on AHR that developed 24 h following cessation of exposure to O3 (Fig. ). In contrast, data from a number of investigators demonstrate that PAI‐1 is essential for the development of AHR following antigen sensitization and challenge (Kuramoto et al. ; Lee et al. ; Tezuka et al. ; Liu et al. ). Nevertheless, we were not surprised that there was no effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on the development of O3‐induced AHR. First, the development of O3‐induced AHR is dependent on CXCR2, the receptor for KC and MIP‐2 (Johnston et al. ), and we observed, for the most part, no effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on BALF KC and MIP‐2 (Fig. B and C). Consequently, given the importance of KC and MIP‐2 to the development of AHR following acute exposure to O3 (Johnston et al. ), we expected, in PAI‐1‐deficient mice, any O3‐induced changes in airway responsiveness to methacholine to correlate with any O3‐induced changes in BALF KC and MIP‐2. Second, features of airway remodeling are nonexistent in lungs of wild‐type mice 24 h following cessation of acute exposure to O3 (2.5 ppm for 3 h) (Triantaphyllopoulos et al. ). Airway remodeling, which is typified, in part, by subepithelial fibrosis, goblet cell hyperplasia, and hypertrophy of airway smooth muscle cells, leads to AHR (Homer and Elias ). Chronic antigen challenge causes airway remodeling and AHR in wild‐type mice, and PAI‐1 deficiency reduces the severity of these sequelae (Kuramoto et al. ; Lee et al. ; Tezuka et al. ; Liu et al. ). Thus, to date, the ability of PAI‐1 to contribute to the development of AHR appears to be mechanistically coupled to the ability of PAI‐1 to promote features of airway remodeling. Because acute exposure to O3 fails to elicit airway remodeling (Triantaphyllopoulos et al. ), this may explain why we failed to observe an effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on the development of O3‐induced AHR.
In a majority of the studies examining the contribution of PAI‐1 to the regulation of pro‐inflammatory cytokine expression, migration of inflammatory leukocytes, and AHR following exposure to diverse injurious stimuli, PAI‐1 was demonstrated to contribute to these aforementioned sequelae. However, PAI‐1 did not make a significant contribution to these same sequelae following acute exposure to O3 (Figs. ). There are a number of plausible reasons that may explain why we failed to observe an effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on O3‐induced pulmonary pathology. First, the ability of PAI‐1 to induce these sequelae may be stimulus specific, which is an observation that is consistently observed for IL‐6 (Cenci et al. ; Johnston et al. ). Second, the time intervals at which we measured our outcome indicators may not be capturing an effect of PAI‐1 deficiency. For example, interruption of IL‐6 signaling has an effect on desquamation of airway epithelial cells at 24 h but not 4 h following cessation of exposure to O3 (Johnston et al. ; Lang et al. ). Thus, if we examine these same indices at other time intervals (e.g., 2, 8, or 36 h) following cessation of exposure, we may observe an effect of PAI‐1‐deficiency. Third, duration of exposure to the inciting stimulus may be important to observe an effect of PAI‐1 deficiency on our outcome indicators. In many of the aforementioned studies where PAI‐1 was demonstrated to have an effect, exposure to the inciting stimulus was for at least 5 h or more, and in some instances, lasted for several days to weeks. Pulmonary responses induced by exposure to O3 acutely (2 ppm for 3 h) as compared to subacutely (0.3 ppm for 72 h) are controlled by different genetic loci (Kleeberger et al. ). Therefore, it is entirely plausible that PAI‐1 regulates responses to subacute as compared to acute O3 exposure.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that there are robust increases in PAI‐1 in the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs following acute exposure to O3. Despite these increases in PAI‐1 within the lungs, PAI‐1 did not functionally contribute to any aspect of the pulmonary pathology induced by acute exposure to O3, including migration of inflammatory leukocytes to air spaces, pulmonary vascular hyperpermeability, and AHR. Nevertheless, these results do not exclude the possibility that PAI‐1 may contribute to the pulmonary pathology induced by subacute or chronic exposure to O3.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
3 Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, Tuxedo, New York
4 Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
5 Comparative Pathology Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
6 Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
7 Section of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
8 Pediatric Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
9 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; Pediatric Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas