You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.
You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.
Credit of ecological interactions: A new conceptual framework to support conservation in a defaunated world
Genes, Luísa; Cid, Bruno; Fernandez, Fernando A S; Pires, Alexandra S.
Ecology and Evolution; Bognor Regis Vol. 7, Iss. 6, (Mar 2017): 1892-1897.
DOI:10.1002/ece3.2746
ReferencesBangs, E. E., & Fritts, S. H. (1996). Reintroducing the gray wolf to central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24, 402–413.Bascompte, J., & Stouffer, D. B. (2009). The assembly and disassembly of ecological networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1781–1787.Cid, B., Figueira, L., Mello, A., Pires, A. S., & Fernandez, F. A. S. (2014). Short-term success in the reintroduction of the red-humped agouti Dasyprocta leporina, an important seed disperser, in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest reserve. Tropical Conservation Science, 7, 796–810.Correia, M., Timóteo, S., Rodríguez-Echeverría, S., Mazars-Simon, A., & Heleno, R. (2016). Refaunation and the reinstatement of the seed-dispersal function in Gorongosa National Park. Conservation Biology, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12782.Devictor, V., Clavel, J., Julliard, R., Lavergne, S., Mouillot, D., Thuiller, W., … Mouquet, N. (2010). Defining and measuring ecological specialization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 15–25.Diamond, J. M. (1972). Biogeographic kinetics: Estimation of relaxation times for avifaunas of southwest pacific islands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 69, 3199–3203.Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Collen, B. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345, 401–406.Galetti, M., Guevara, R., Côrtes, M. C., Fadini, R., Von Matter, S., Leite, A. B., … Pires, M. M. (2013). Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science, 340, 1086–1091.Galetti, M., Pires, A. S., Brancalion, P., & Fernandez, F. A. S. (2016). Reversing defaunation by trophic rewilding in empty forests. Biotropica, doi: 10.1111/btp.12407García, D., Martínez, D., Herrera, J. M., & Morales, J. M. (2013). Functional heterogeneity in a plant-frugivore assemblage enhances seed dispersal resilience to habitat loss. Ecography, 36, 197–208.Guimarães Jr, P. R., Jordano, P., & Thompson, J. N. (2011). Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks. Ecology Letters, 14, 877–885.Harvey, E., Gounand, I., Ward, C. L., & Altermatt, F. (2016). Bridging ecology and conservation: From ecological networks to ecosystem function. Journal of Applied Ecology, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12769Iacona, G., Maloney, R. F., Chadès, I., Bennett, J. R., Seddon, P. J., & Possingham, H. P. (2016). Prioritising revived species: What are the conservation management implications of de-extinction?Functional Ecology, doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12720Jackson, S. T., & Sax, D. F. (2009). Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: Extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 153–160.Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., & Olesen, J. M. (2002). Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant–animal interactions. Ecology Letters, 6, 69–81.Kurten, E. L. (2013). Cascading effects of contemporaneous defaunation on tropical forest communities. Biological Conservation, 163, 22–32.Kuussaari, M., Bommarco, R., Heikkinen, R. K., Helm, A., Krauss, J., Lindborg, R., … Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2009). Extinction debt: A challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 564–571.MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Mackenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., & Hines, J. E. (2006). Occupancy estimation and modelling: Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Mao, J. S., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Singer, F. J., Vales, D. J., Vore, J. M., & Merril, E. H. (2005). Habitat selection by elk before and after wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 1691–1707.Marshall, K. N., Hobbs, N. T., & Cooper, D. J. (2013). Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20122977.McCann, K. S. (2000). The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–233.Mech, D. L., Smith, D. W., Murphy, K. M., & MacNulty, D. R. (2001). Winter severity and wolf predation on a formerly wolf-free elk herd. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 65, 998–1003.Mittelbach, G. G., Turner, A. M., Hall, D. J., Rettig, J. E., & Osenberg, C. W. (1995). Perturbation and resilience a long-term and whole-lake study of predator extinction and reintroduction. Ecology, 76, 2347–2360.Oliveira-Santos, L. G. R., & Fernandez, F. A. S. (2010). Pleistocene rewilding, Frankenstein ecosystems, and an alternative conservation agenda. Conservation Biology, 24, 4–6.Pires, A. S., & Galetti, M. (2012). The agouti Dasyprocta leporina (Rodentia: Dasyproctidae) as seed disperser of the palm Astrocaryum aculeatissimum. Mastozoologia Neotropical, 19, 147–153.Polak, T., & Saltz, D. (2011). Reintroduction as an ecosystem restoration technique. Conservation Biology, 25, 424.Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L. (2003). Wolf reintroduction, predation risk, and cottonwood recovery in Yellowstone National Park. Forest Ecology and Management, 184, 299–313.Seddon, P. J., Griffiths, C. J., Soorae, P. S., & Armstrong, D. P. (2014). Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. Science, 345, 406–412.Smith, D. W., & Bangs, E. E. (2009). Reintroduction of top-order predators. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Smith, D. W., Peterson, R. O., & Houston, D. B. (2003). Yellowstone after wolves. BioScience, 53, 330.Svenning, J. C., Pedersen, P. B. M., Donlan, J., Ejrnaes, R., Faurby, S., Galetti, M., … Vera, F. W. M. (2016). Science for a wilder Anthropocene-synthesis and future directions for rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 1–7.Terborgh, J., Nuñez-Iturri, G., Pitman, N. C., Cornejo Valverde, F. H., Alvarez, P., Swamy, V., … Timothy Paine, C. E. (2008). Tree recruitment in an empty forest. Ecology, 89, 1752–1768.Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L., & Nowak, M. A. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65–66.Tylianakis, J. M., Didham, R. K., Bascompte, J., & Wardle, D. A. (2008). Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 11, 1351–1363.Tylianakis, J. M., Laliberté, E., Nielsen, A., & Bascompte, J. (2010). Conservation of species interaction networks. Biological Conservation, 143, 2270–2279.Valiente-Banuet, A., Aizen, M. A., Alcántara, J. M., Arroyo, J., Cocucci, A., Galetti, M., … Zamora, R. (2015). Beyond species loss: The extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Functional Ecology, 29, 299–307.Walker, B. (1995). Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conservation Biology, 9, 747–752.Weiblen, G. D. (2002). How to be a fig wasp. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 299–330.Wolf, E. C., Cooper, D. J., & Hobbs, N. T. (2007). Hydrologic regime and herbivory stabilize an alternative state in Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Applications, 17, 1572–1587.Zucaratto, R. (2013). Os frutos que as cutias comiam: recrutamento da palmeira Astrocaryum aculeatissimum na ausência do seu principal dispersor de sementes. MSc Thesis. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
As defaunation spreads through the world, there is an urgent need for restoring ecological interactions, thus assuring ecosystem processes. Here, we define the new concept of credit of ecological interactions, as the number of interactions that can be restored in a focal area by species colonization or reintroduction. We also define rewiring time, as the time span until all the links that build the credit of ecological interactions of a focal area have become functional again. We expect that the credit will be gradually cashed following refaunation in rates that are proportional to (1) the abundance of the reintroduced species (that is expected to increase in time since release), (2) the abundance of the local species that interact with them, and (3) the traits of reintroduced species. We illustrated this approach using a theoretical model and an empirical case study where the credit of ecological interactions was estimated. This new conceptual framework is useful for setting reintroduction priorities and for evaluating the success of conservation initiatives that aim to restore ecosystem services.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
Details
Title
Credit of ecological interactions: A new conceptual framework to support conservation in a defaunated world
Author
Genes, Luísa 1
; Cid, Bruno 1 ; Fernandez, Fernando A S 1 ; Pires, Alexandra S 2
1 Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
2 Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil