Age-dependent male mating tactics in a spider mite—A life-history perspective

Abstract

Males often fight with rival males for access to females. However, some males display nonfighting tactics such as sneaking, satellite behavior, or female mimicking. When these mating tactics comprise a conditional strategy, they are often thought to be explained by resource holding potential (RHP), that is, nonfighting tactics are displayed by less competitive males who are more likely to lose a fight. The alternative mating tactics, however, can also be explained by life-history theory, which predicts that young males avoid fighting, regardless of their RHP, if it pays off to wait for future reproduction. Here, we test whether the sneaking tactic displayed by young males of the two-spotted spider mite can be explained by life-history theory. We tested whether young sneaker males survive longer than young fighter males after a bout of mild or strong competition with old fighter males. We also investigated whether old males have a more protective outer skin—a possible proxy for RHP—by measuring cuticle hardness and elasticity using nanoindentation. We found that young sneaker males survived longer than young fighter males after mild male competition. This difference was not found after strong male competition, which suggests that induction of sneaking tactic is affected by male density. Hardness and elasticity of the skin did not vary with male age. Given that earlier work could also not detect morphometric differences between fighter and sneaker males, we conclude that there is no apparent increase in RHP with age in the mite and age-dependent male mating tactics in the mite can be explained only by life-history theory. Because it is likely that fighting incurs a survival cost, age-dependent alternative mating tactics may be explained by life-history theory in many species when reproduction of old males is a significant factor in fitness.

References Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H. … Green, P. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. R package version 3.2.0. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Bhushan, B., & Li, X. (2003). Nanomechanical characterisation of solid surfaces and thin films. International Materials Reviews, 48, 125–164. Boudreaux, H. B. (1963). Biological aspects of some phytophagous mites. Annual Review of Entomology, 8, 137–154. Brockmann, H. J. (2001). The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 30, 1–51. Candolin, U., & Vlieger, L. (2013). Should attractive males sneak: The trade-off between current and future offspring. PLoS One, 8, e57992. Choh, Y., Ignacio, M., Sabelis, M. W., & Janssen, A. (2012). Predator-prey role reversals, juvenile experience and adult antipredator behaviour. Scientific Reports, 2, 728. Crespi, B. J. (1988). Risks and benefits of lethal male fighting in the colonial, polygynous thrips Hoplothrips karnyi (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 293–301. Drukker, B., Bruin, J., Jacobs, G., Kroon, A., & Sabelis, M. W. (2000). How predatory mites learn to cope with variability in volatile plant signals in the environment of their herbivorous prey. Experimental & Applied Acarology, 24, 881–895. Egas, M., Norde, D.-J., & Sabelis, M. W. (2003). Adaptive learning in arthropods: Spider mites learn to distinguish food quality. Experimental & Applied Acarology, 30, 233–247. Fawcett, T. W., & Johnstone, R. A. (2010). Learning your own strength: Winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 1427–1434. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection: A complete variorum editionOxford: Oxford University Press. Gross, M. R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 92–98. Hack, M. A. (1997). The energetic costs of fighting in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus L. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 28–36. Hamilton, W. D. (1979). Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. In M. S. Blum, & N. A. Blum (Eds.), Reproductive competition and sexual selection in insects (pp. 167–220). New York: Academic Press. Helle, W. (1967). Fertilization in the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae: Acari). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 10, 103–110. Helle, W., & Sabelis, M. W. (1985). Spider mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol. 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50, 346–363. Kemp, D. J. (2006). Ageing, reproductive value, and the evolution of lifetime fighting behaviour. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 88, 565–578. Klocke, D., & Schmitz, H. (2012). Material properties of photomechanical infrared receptors in pyrophilous Melanophila beetles and Aradus bugs. Acta Biomaterialia, 8, 3392–3399. Kokko, H. (1997). Evolutionarily stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 99–107. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 3.2.0. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest. Lee, V. E., Head, M. L., Carter, M. J., & Royle, N. J. (2014). Effects of age and experience on contest behavior in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 172–179. Mann, A. B. (2005). Nanomechanical properties of solid surfaces and thin films. In P. B. Bhushan (Ed.), Nanotribology and nanomechanics (pp. 575–622). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Müller, M., Olek, M., Giersig, M., & Schmitz, H. (2008). Micromechanical properties of consecutive layers in specialized insect cuticle: The gula of Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) and the infrared sensilla of Melanophila acuminata (Coleoptera, Buprestidae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 211, 2576–2583. Oliver, W. C., & Pharr, G. C. (1992). An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. Journal of Materials Research, 7, 1564–1583. Parker, G. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 223–243. Potter, D. A., Wrensch, D. L., & Johnston, D. E. (1976a). Aggression and mating success in male spider mites. Science, 193, 160–161. Potter, D. A., Wrensch, D. L., & Johnston, D. E. (1976b). Guarding, aggressive behavior, and mating success in male twospotted spider mites. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 69, 707–711. R Development Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/. Radwan, J. (2009). Alternative mating tactics in acarid mites. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 39, 185–208. Rahmani, H., Hoffmann, D., Walzer, A., & Schausberger, P. (2009). Adaptive learning in the foraging behavior of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 946–950. Reece, S. E., Innocent, T. M., & West, S. A. (2007). Lethal male–male combat in the parasitoid Melittobia acasta: Are size and competitive environment important? Animal Behaviour, 74, 1163–1169. Roff, D. (2002). Life history evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc. Saito, Y. (1979). Comparative studies on life histories of three species of spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology, 14, 83–94. Saitō, Y. (1990). “Harem” and “non-harem” type mating systems in two species of subsocial spider mites (Acari, Tetranychidae). Researches on Population Ecology, 32, 263–278. Sato, Y., Sabelis, M. W., & Egas, M. (2014). Alternative male mating behaviour in the two-spotted spider mite: Dependence on age and density. Animal Behaviour, 92, 125–131. Sato, Y., Sabelis, M. W., Egas, M., & Faraji, F. (2013). Alternative phenotypes of male mating behaviour in the two-spotted spider mite. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 61, 31–41. Satoh, Y., Yano, S., & Takafuji, A. (2001). Mating strategy of spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) males: Postcopulatory guarding to assure paternity. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 36, 41–45. Sharpe, L. L. (2005). Play fighting does not affect subsequent fighting success in wild meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1023–1029. Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000). Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model. New York, NY: Springer New York. Therneau, T. M., & Thomas, L. (2015). Survival analysis. R package version 3.2.0. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. New York: Springer. Weatherhead, P. J., & Boag, P. T. (1995). Pair and extra-pair mating success relative to male quality in red-winged blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 81–91.