It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Members of the hominins – namely the so-called ‘australopiths’ and the species of the genus Homo – are known to possess short and deep mandibles and relatively small incisors and canines. It is commonly assumed that this suite of traits evolved in early members of the clade in response to changing environmental conditions and increased consumption of though food items. With the emergence of Homo, the functional meaning of mandible shape variation is thought to have been weakened by technological advancements and (later) by the control over fire. In contrast to this expectation, we found that mandible shape evolution in hominins is exceptionally rapid as compared to any other primate clade, and that the direction and rate of shape change (from the ape ancestor) are no different between the australopiths and Homo. We deem several factors including the loss of honing complex, canine reduction, and the acquisition of different diets may have concurred in producing such surprisingly high evolutionary rates. This study reveals the evolution of mandibular shape in hominins has strong morpho-functional and ecological significance attached.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details










1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Naples, Italy
2 Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Department of Environmental Biology, Roma, Italy
3 Università degli Studi del Molise, Department of Biosciences and The Territory, Pesche, Isernia, Italy
4 Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Department of Environmental Biology, Roma, Italy; Istituto Italiano di Paleontologia Umana, Roma, Italy
5 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Naples, Italy; Università degli Studi di Firenze, Department of Earth Sciences, Florence, Italy
6 Università degli Studi di Firenze, Department of Earth Sciences, Florence, Italy
7 Liverpool John Moores University, School of Natural Science and Psychology, Liverpool, UK