It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Gamma-band oscillations arise from the interplay between neural excitation (E) and inhibition (I) and may provide a non-invasive window into the state of cortical circuitry. A bell-shaped modulation of gamma response power by increasing the intensity of sensory input was observed in animals and is thought to reflect neural gain control. Here we sought to find a similar input-output relationship in humans with MEG via modulating the intensity of a visual stimulation by changing the velocity/temporal-frequency of visual motion. In the first experiment, adult participants observed static and moving gratings. The frequency of the MEG gamma response monotonically increased with motion velocity whereas power followed a bell-shape. In the second experiment, on a large group of children and adults, we found that despite drastic developmental changes in frequency and power of gamma oscillations, the relative suppression at high motion velocities was scaled to the same range of values across the life-span. In light of animal and modeling studies, the modulation of gamma power and frequency at high stimulation intensities characterizes the capacity of inhibitory neurons to counterbalance increasing excitation in visual networks. Gamma suppression may thus provide a non-invasive measure of inhibitory-based gain control in the healthy and diseased brain.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Gothenburg, Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre (GNC), Gothenburg, Sweden; Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
2 Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
3 MedTech West, Gothenburg, Sweden; University of Gothenburg, Institute of Neuroscience& Physiology, Gothenburg, Sweden
4 University of Gothenburg, Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre (GNC), Gothenburg, Sweden
5 Autism Research Laboratory, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
6 MedTech West, Gothenburg, Sweden
7 University of Gothenburg, Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre (GNC), Gothenburg, Sweden; Harvard Medical School, MGH/MIT/HST Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA
8 Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia; Autism Research Laboratory, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia