It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The natural distribution of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) has been changed by humans in recent decades to such an extent that the formerly widest-spread European subspecies, Apis mellifera mellifera, is threatened by extinction through introgression from highly divergent commercial strains in large tracts of its range. Conservation efforts for A. m. mellifera are underway in multiple European countries requiring reliable and cost-efficient molecular tools to identify purebred colonies. Here, we developed four ancestry-informative SNP assays for high sample throughput genotyping using the iPLEX Mass Array system. Our customized assays were tested on DNA from individual and pooled, haploid and diploid honeybee samples extracted from different tissues using a diverse range of protocols. The assays had a high genotyping success rate and yielded accurate genotypes. Performance assessed against whole-genome data showed that individual assays behaved well, although the most accurate introgression estimates were obtained for the four assays combined (117 SNPs). The best compromise between accuracy and genotyping costs was achieved when combining two assays (62 SNPs). We provide a ready-to-use cost-effective tool for accurate molecular identification and estimation of introgression levels to more effectively monitor and manage A. m. mellifera conservatories.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Mountain Research Centre (CIMO), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal; Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
2 Department of Zoology, Ryan Institute, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
3 The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
4 Agroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland
5 Aarhus University, Department of Agroecology, Slagelse, Denmark
6 Área de Biología Animal, Dpto. de Zoología y Antropología Física, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
7 Laboratoire Evolution, Génomes et Spéciation, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Université de Versailles, Versailles, France
8 Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
9 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
10 Mountain Research Centre (CIMO), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal