It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Antipsychotics are the most widely used medications for the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. While such drugs generally ameliorate positive symptoms, clinical responses are highly variable in terms of negative symptoms and cognitive impairments. However, predictors of individual responses have been elusive. Here, we report a pharmacogenetic interaction related to a core cognitive dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia. We show that genetic variations reducing dysbindin-1 expression can identify individuals whose executive functions respond better to antipsychotic drugs, both in humans and in mice. Multilevel ex vivo and in vivo analyses in postmortem human brains and genetically modified mice demonstrate that such interaction between antipsychotics and dysbindin-1 is mediated by an imbalance between the short and long isoforms of dopamine D2 receptors, leading to enhanced presynaptic D2 function within the prefrontal cortex. These findings reveal one of the pharmacodynamic mechanisms underlying individual cognitive response to treatment in patients with schizophrenia, suggesting a potential approach for improving the use of antipsychotic drugs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Genetics of Cognition laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy; Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Center Lausanne, Prilly-Lausanne, Switzerland
2 Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Genetics of Cognition laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy
3 Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Genetics of Cognition laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Universita’ degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy
4 Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Johns Hopkins University Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA
5 Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy
6 IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Rome, Italy
7 Research Laboratory for Stereology and Neuroscience, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark
8 IRCCS E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy
9 University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
10 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
11 Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Johns Hopkins University Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA; Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Neuroscience and the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
12 IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Rome, Italy; Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA