Abstract

Archaeological evidence suggests that dogs were introduced to the islands of Oceania via Island Southeast Asia around 3,300 years ago, and reached the eastern islands of Polynesia by the fourteenth century AD. This dispersal is intimately tied to human expansion, but the involvement of dogs in Pacific migrations is not well understood. Our analyses of seven new complete ancient mitogenomes and five partial mtDNA sequences from archaeological dog specimens from Mainland and Island Southeast Asia and the Pacific suggests at least three dog dispersal events into the region, in addition to the introduction of dingoes to Australia. We see an early introduction of dogs to Island Southeast Asia, which does not appear to extend into the islands of Oceania. A shared haplogroup identified between Iron Age Taiwanese dogs, terminal-Lapita and post-Lapita dogs suggests that at least one dog lineage was introduced to Near Oceania by or as the result of interactions with Austronesian language speakers associated with the Lapita Cultural Complex. We did not find any evidence that these dogs were successfully transported beyond New Guinea. Finally, we identify a widespread dog clade found across the Pacific, including the islands of Polynesia, which likely suggests a post-Lapita dog introduction from southern Island Southeast Asia.

Details

Title
Complex history of dog (Canis familiaris) origins and translocations in the Pacific revealed by ancient mitogenomes
Author
Greig, K 1 ; Gosling, A 2 ; Collins, C J 2 ; Boocock, J 3 ; McDonald, K 2 ; Addison, D J 4 ; Allen, M S 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; David, B 6 ; Gibbs, M 7 ; Higham, C F W 1 ; Liu, F 8 ; McNiven, I J 6 ; S O’Connor 9 ; Tsang, C H 8 ; Walter, R 1 ; Matisoo-Smith, E 2 

 Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 
 Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 
 Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States of America 
 Archaeology Department, American Samoa Power Authority, Pago Pago, American Samoa, USA 
 Anthropology, School of Social Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 
 Monash Indigenous Studies Centre, Monash University, VIC, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity & Heritage, Acton, ACT, Australia 
 School of Humanities, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia 
 Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Taipei City 115, Taiwan 
 Archaeology & Natural History, School of Culture History & Language, College of Asia & the Pacific, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity & Heritage, Acton, ACT, Australia 
Pages
1-9
Publication year
2018
Publication date
Jun 2018
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2055600024
Copyright
© 2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.