Abstract
Face-sheet wrinkling is a standard failure mode for sandwich structures with thin, stiff face sheets and a thick, soft core under in-plane compression. Constructing a core with a multi-layer material and placing the stiffest material in the outermost region of the core can efficiently improve the wrinkling stress. However, complex engineering requirements may hinder this ideal core design. Hence, the design of sandwich structures for maximum wrinkling stress requires a systematic structural optimization method. This study proposes a max-min structural optimization model for the design of the multi-layer core thickness distribution in a sandwich beam, aiming at the maximization of wrinkling stress. Two series of layers are introduced: virtual and physical. The thicknesses of the former serve to compute the wrinkling stress, whereas those of the latter serve to describe the thickness distribution of the multi-layer core. The optimization is structured in two levels: the inner level is formulated as a minimization problem to compute the wrinkling stress, and the outer level as a maximization problem to obtain the optimal thickness distribution. The proposed max-min optimization model determines the optimal thickness distribution of a sandwich beam with a multi-layer core to achieve maximum wrinkling stress, independent of specific engineering requirements. For example, simple mass requirements in engineering may prevent the stiffest material from being placed on the outermost layer. Moreover, the method is highly computationally efficient, owing to the simple convex feasible domains of its optimization model and the elimination of matrix eigenvalue solutions and finite element mesh operations. We therefore recommend its adoption in engineering design because the method can explicitly incorporate complex constraints into its formulation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Song, Xiangqing 2 ; Liu, Shutian 3 1 School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China; State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis, Optimization and CAE Software for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China [email protected]
2 School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China
3 State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis, Optimization and CAE Software for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China





