It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Anonymous social network has attracted ever-increasing attention from research community in recent years, however, it also brings some complications to ours daily life. We want to clarify the status of anonymous social network and put forward some governance strategies. In this paper we focus our attention on analyzing shortcomings of current regulatory strategies by comparing and analyzing the data from anonymous social network application Secret and social network application Sina Weibo. Combining with the characteristics of information dissemination in anonymous social network, we mainly put forward an governance strategy based on geographical location.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





