Fig 3 and the caption for Fig 3 are incorrect. The authors have provided a corrected version here.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Fig 3. Illustrative example of the interaction between the probability of patients endorsing barriers to exercise (based on latent class analysis) and the healthcare staff’s level of interest towards receiving feedback from patients on physical activity.
Dots represent fitted means from the multiple regression models (see text), vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Dots are connected by lines for the purpose of helping visual comparisons between means. Patients were categorized into three classes according to different values (i.e., <5%, 5±95%, >95%) of the posterior probability of being barrier endorsers according to latent class analysis. Healthcare staff’s level of interest towards receiving feedback from patients was categorized according to tertiles of the distribution of dialysis center-averaged values. Upper tertile indicates lowest interest by the dialysis staff towards patients’ physical exercise; lower tertile indicates highest interest. Unlike in patients who were definitely barrier endorsers, in other patient categories dialysis staff attitude did make a difference, as the dialysis staffs with the highest interest in physical exercise (blue line) was associated with an increase in the HAP-AAS by nearly 30 points compared to the dialysis staff with the lowest interest in physical exercise (black line).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198987.g001
1. Regolisti G, Maggiore U, Sabatino A, Gandolfini I, Pioli S, Torino C, et al. (2018) Interaction of healthcare staff’s attitude with barriers to physical activity in hemodialysis patients: A quantitative assessment. PLoS ONE 13(4): e0196313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196313 pmid:29702702
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2018 Regolisti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.