It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In order to elucidate the influence of genetic factors on phenotype variation, non-additive genetic interactions (i.e., epistasis) have to be taken into account. However, there is a lack of methods that can reliably detect such interactions, especially for quantitative traits. Random Forest was previously recognized as a powerful tool to identify the genetic variants that regulate trait variation, mainly due to its ability to take epistasis into account. However, although it can account for interactions, it does not specifically detect them. Therefore, we propose three approaches that extract interactions from a Random Forest by testing for specific signatures that arise from interactions, which we termed 'paired selection frequency', 'split asymmetry', and 'selection asymmetry'. Since they complement each other for different epistasis types, an ensemble method that combines the three approaches was also created. We evaluated our approaches on multiple simulated scenarios and two different real datasets from different \textit{Saccharomyces cerevisiae} crosses. We compared them to the commonly used exhaustive pair-wise linear model approach, as well as several two-stage approaches, where variants are pre-selected prior to interaction testing. The Random Forest-based methods presented here generally outperformed the other methods at identifying meaningful genetic interactions both in simulated and real data. Further examination of the results for the simulated and real datasets established how interactions are extracted from the Random Forest, and explained the performance differences between the methods. Thus, the approaches presented here extend the applicability of Random Forest for the genetic mapping of biological traits.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





